• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

John August

  • Arlo Finch
  • Scriptnotes
  • Library
  • Store
  • About

Scriptnotes Transcript

Scriptnotes, 424: Austin Film Festival, Transcript

November 4, 2019 Scriptnotes Transcript

The original post for this episode can be found [here](https://johnaugust.com/2019/austin-film-festival-2019).

**John August:** Hey, this is John. Today’s episode of Scriptnotes was recorded live at the Austin Film Festival. I wasn’t there, but I’m told the language gets a bit salty, so keep that in mind before you listen. Enjoy.

**Craig Mazin:** Hello and welcome. My name is Craig Mazin and this is Scriptnotes. A podcast about screenwriting and things—

**Crowd:** That are interesting to screenwriters.

**Craig:** Pitch perfect. And we are live in Austin once again at the Austin Writers Conference in a packed room.

[Audience cheers]

**Craig:** I wish all of you at home could see the enthusiasm in this room right now. I am so excited to be here. John isn’t with us this year, but I’m in control now. So, strap in everyone. This is going to be interesting. And I assure you as I always do that there’s going to be a lot of time for Q&A because I do believe that, you know, honestly that’s why you’re here. We have incredible guests. And so I want to introduce them one by one.

Today joining us on the stage we have Ayanna Floyd who – Ayanna has written at a very high level on Hannibal and The Chi and the upcoming Cotton Club series which I believe you’re the showrunner of the upcoming Cotton Club series. Is that right?

**Ayanna Floyd:** It’s Dead-ish.

**Craig:** Ish. I like it. That’s good enough for me. Next to them we have two up and coming writers named David Benioff and Dan Weiss. And you may know them from Gamay of Thrones. [laughs] We have the great Liz Hannah with us tonight. Liz Hannah has written The Post, and she is also on Mindhunter. Come on.

Never one to sit around and wait, Nichelle Tramble has shown up just in time – by the way, you look beautiful tonight. Did you put like, OK, something is going on there. This is great. Nichelle Tramble, I’ve got a thing with Nichelle. And her husband is right next to her. It’s weird. What room are you in? [laughs] Nichelle Tramble has written on Justified, The Good Wife, and she is the showrunner and creator of the upcoming Truth Be Told on Apple. Nichelle Tramble.

And next to her, Malcolm Spellman, who isn’t my oldest but is my dearest friend in the world, and has written on Empire and is the showrunner of the upcoming Falcon and the Winter Soldier from Marvel. Malcolm Spellman.

And then just to mix it up a total failure. David Mandel unfortunately has only written on Saturday Night Live, Conan O’Brien, Seinfeld, Curb Your Enthusiasm, and Veep. I’m so sorry.

Well, we’ve got quite a show in store for you all. I’ve got some normal questions that I’m going to throw out to you guys. Please all feel free to chip in, even if I don’t necessarily address them to you. And we’re going to have a little bit of a fun game we’re going to play later. And then we’re going to turn it over to the audience for Q&A. And it’s going to be a great old time. And then when it’s over, more drinking. So, hooray, welcome to Austin.

So I want to start with David Benioff and Liz and Malcolm. We all have something in common. We were in movies. We started in features and now we find ourselves in TV. And I’m just kind of curious for you guys is there any interest in going back or is this kind of a permanent exodus? Are people just leaving features and going to TV and not returning?

**David Benioff:** Liz?

**Liz Hannah:** Malcolm?

**Malcolm Spellman:** Um, it’s funny. I did this little panel at the WGA for black writers. And the statistic was like if African-Americans made up 1.5% of feature writers, it went down in its diversity push to 1%. So–

**Craig:** Oh, so the diversity is working.

**Malcolm:** It’s – my point being I think the feature business is so hostile and closed, it’s a worthless cause. I don’t think we should bother with it. They can have that shit. We’re doing good stuff. We’re making a difference with TV.

**Craig:** To be clear, they is white people.

**Malcolm:** So what was the woman’s name from Crazy Rich Asians? The writer?

**Craig:** Adele Lim.

**Malcolm:** Who needs that shit? You know what I’m saying? They can have it. They can just fail on their own.

**Craig:** Let me put a little context there. She was very successful, but she had difficulty getting paid what she thought was a fair amount to return for the sequel. I didn’t want you to misunderstand Malcolm there. So, continue. I’m just thinking of Twitter and how it is.

**Malcolm:** So, fuck no.

**Craig:** I’m protecting you as best I can.

**Malcolm:** Like what I’m presenting to you all is, no, the truth is, you know, an occasional thing might come around where it’s worth it just because I know the experience is going to be great, but I have no intention of giving them my energy or creativity in a meaningful way ever again. Fuck ‘em.

**Craig:** Well, that was a bit of a mushy answer. David Benioff, you and Dan Weiss, you’ve made a new deal to make programming for Netflix, but Netflix of course is kind of it could be features, it could be television. Does it even matter? Or is it just sort of mushed together for you guys now?

You can’t throw this one to Liz.

**Dan Weiss:** Dave?

**David Benioff:** Malcolm took my answer.

**Craig:** In case you wondering what it meant to be a professional, there it is. You’re not that funny. Don’t even try. Guys?

**Dan:** What was the question?

**Craig:** The question is—

**David Mandel:** Craig, is this the vamping part or did we start yet?

**Liz:** It’s so nice you’re still holding onto your questions so tightly because those should just be thrown away.

**Craig:** No, oh no, no. John would be very upset. I have to try at my best. So the question for you guys is, you know, you did a lot of feature work. You guys had enormous success in television. Is there any road back to features like traditional features, or no?

**David Benioff:** I think the thing that would be hard to go back to is on every feature I worked on I never once sat in on a casting session. I never once sat in in the edit bay. Never once sat in hiring department heads, any of that stuff. Because that’s just the way it is for screenwriters on a feature. And so to have the experience that Dan and I had on Thrones where we got to do that stuff, and that was so much fun, and that’s so crucial to telling a story, to give that up and go back I think would be really hard.

**Dan:** I mean, that said, Netflix is fluid in that way. So if the opportunity arises to tell – I mean, some stories need 75 hours, some stories need 87 minutes. And if we have stories to tell that need 87 minutes and we can find a way to do them there that lets us tell stories the way we’ve been telling stories for the past 10 years then, yeah, that would be great.

Obviously all of us here grew up on movies. Everybody in this room grew up on movies. We haven’t kicked to the curb the things that built us.

**Craig:** Malcolm has.

**Dan:** Malcolm. He has, but like–

**Craig:** Definitively. I believe his words were “Fuck ‘em.”

**David Mandel:** And I was just going to say possibly by association we’ve all been ruined tonight. It’s very possible just sitting here with him on this stage.

**Craig:** Liz Hannah, what do you think?

**Liz:**But also like, yeah, I mean, Malcolm is right. Why shouldn’t he feel that way? And why shouldn’t he not want to work in movies because of that? I don’t think it’s dismissive as like, yeah, fuck it. I don’t think it’s a joke. I think it’s real. Like I think it’s like, yeah, fuck ‘em. If they’re not going to look at you and respect you then don’t do it.

And your question of going back to features and working in TV is, look, we’re writers. Writers are not respected as much in features as they are in television. It’s a fact.

**Craig:** It is. I have felt it myself. Well—

David Mandel: I was just going to – a serious point just wherever this fits in, and I know obviously Chernobyl most recently, but you were a comedy writer as once and a while I was. I mean, what little movies they make, none of them are comedies. The movies that I guess what little I used to sell, they don’t even make those anymore.

**Craig:** That’s right.

David Mandel: I mean, literally don’t make them. They don’t exist. Like the notion of the – you know, the first thing I did with Schaffer and Berg was – the goal was, hey, we’re going to sort of spec sell and make a $15 million little movie that’s funny. Just nonexistent. And that’s crazy.

**Liz:**I’m going to also counter. The two movies that I have made, one was a political film about two people in their 50s in 1971 and nobody fucks. And then the second one was a romantic comedy in 2019 when everybody said romantic comedies were dead. And not a lot of people saw the romantic comedy, to be fair. But people liked it. And people had a conversation about what romantic comedy was in the new era. And so I will say like what it taught me in that experience of working in features and working in television is like nothing we think is expected is expected. Or like nothing we think matters matters. Like let’s just do the things we want to do.

Like I wanted to write the American president in 2019. I wanted to write a movie about falling in love with my husband in 2019. And I thought nobody would want to see it. And not a lot of people did.

**Craig:** So you were right. Nobody wanted to see it.

**Liz:**But people did—

**Craig:** Some people wanted to see it.

**Liz:**Some people wanted to. But what I’m saying is like I think if we’re going to make movies now it has to be about us investing enough into it. Like it can’t just be about projects that we’re being assigned. And it can’t just be about things that we’re doing because they want us to do them. It has to be because you’re committing to do it. It has to be the way we’re doing TV now which is you’re committing ten years of your life. To do a movie now should be like I’m putting my soul into it.

**Craig:** Well that’s a great dream. I mean, I think mostly what’s available now for features is kind of what they want you to do, sort of the inventory that they have. And obviously a great night for those of you who want to be in features, so. So welcome to the show. And good luck.

**Dan:** Watch Craig go back to features.

**Craig:** Probably. Since you all abandoned it all of that money is mine.

**Dan:** Nobody is there. Nobody is there.

**Craig:** Ayanna and Nichelle, two of you. I want to talk to the two of you because now we’re going to switch over to the television world and the way it’s changing. And I think of the two of you as great examples of people that come in in kind of a traditional route. You come in, you’re working as writers. You impress – we were talking about this at dinner – and you go up and up and up. There’s a ladder. And you climb the ladder and you get to the top of the ladder and you make your own show. You run your own show.

But I have this weird feeling that these days that ladder is getting short-circuited. That suddenly people are just showing up and suddenly they’re making a show. And maybe they’re not necessarily ready. And I wanted to ask the two of you what your experience is of that and if you think that the ladder is being disrupted. The normal progress.

**Ayanna:**Yes, the normal progress is being disrupted. And on one hand it’s a good thing, because it’s allowed for people who look like me to kind of kick the door in.

**Craig:** Beautiful.

**Ayanna:** That. And black. [laughs]

**Craig:** Oh, I want to assure you I totally see color.

**Ayanna:** So it’s allowed many of us to come in, because the traditional route that I went through, that Nichelle went through, there is absolute value in it. Also, it took me twice as long to climb that ladder and it wasn’t always fun. And it was sometimes harder than it needed to be. So I can appreciate people just coming in and kicking the door down. Right?

On the other side, I won’t say which show, but I have noticed that a lot of younger writers are just not equipped. I mean, they’re just not equipped.

**Craig:** They’re not ready.

**Ayanna:** They’re not ready. And in they’re in rooms and they’re getting opportunities that they are absolutely not ready for. And what’s going to happen is and what often happens is they get minimized very quickly. And I also worry – we talk about this all the time – when the industry starts to shrink, because it will, because there’s so much television, so much content, where will those people go? And what will happen? And that’s why my thing is always you have to focus on the craft. You have to work hard. And you, you know, writing is a process. It’s not a destination. I still have insecurities as a writer. I just called Nichelle a couple of weeks ago and I was like, hey, I’ve got a pitch coming up. Can I talk to you about it? Like those types of things matter.

And I do feel like it has gotten a little lost.

**Craig:** Professionalism. It seems like what you’re talking about is professionalism.

**Ayanna:**Basically. I’m trying to be nice. [laughs]

**Craig:** No, no. I think that there’s a real concern that as the door gets kicked open and things get short-circuited that some people are going to come in, they’re not ready. They have an initial failure and they just leave. Right? They don’t go through. Nichelle, what’s your perspective on this?

**Nichelle Tramble:** Well, the way that I saw that when I was staffing for Truth Be Told, I would get submissions from agents for writers for staff. And they were, you know, at a producer level or supervising producer level. And then when I looked at their actual credits they were on shows that had four episodes, six episodes, ten episodes. And so they were getting that bump after every year, but the experience wasn’t there.

And that didn’t make any sense to me. I felt like I know if you finish a season but seasons have shrunk. On The Good Wife we did 22 episodes. So after four years on The Good Wife you’ve done a lot of TV. Yeah, so that’s a huge difference. So if you come to me and you’ve gotten a bump up the ladder but you only have 12 episodes total it didn’t make any sense. And it didn’t make any sense in the room or on the page because there were just a lot of basic things that weren’t learned and weren’t there, from basic writing an outline or a story document or something like that, to simple room etiquette. And that’s a big deal.

**Craig:** Room etiquette.

**Nichelle:** Yeah.

**Craig:** And Malcolm, you’re running a room. How do you kind of bring the new kids along to kind of get them educated about what the room etiquette is? And if they’re struggling do you lift them up or do you let them sink?

**Malcolm:** It’s getting to the point now where we are – me and Nichelle personally – trying to cultivate a farm league. Because the people coming in now there’s a culture clash that’s going on with I’m not–

**Craig:** Don’t worry about it. Just go ahead and blow it up.

**David Mandel:** Just say it. Just say Fuck ‘em.

**Craig:** Fuck ‘em.

**David Mandel:** Fuck ‘em. Come on, no, no, fuck ‘em.

**Malcolm:** It’s funny, can I side bar real quick? When I first started doing round tables with you and getting around guys like this, you’re at home and you’re thinking you’re super funny and you’re a genius. And then you get around the big leagues and you’re like they can do that shit all fucking day, 18 hours.

**Craig:** Mandel has still got some heat on his fast ball.

**Malcolm:** Yeah. That’s what Wilmore told me. I was in the–

**Craig:** One of the Scary Movies?

**Malcolm:** Super hero one.

**Craig:** Oh, yeah, yeah.

**Malcolm:** And Wilmore was killing me. And he knew it. And I was walking out and he said, “You like that heat I was throwing in there?” [laughs]

**Craig:** You’ve still got it.

**Malcolm:** But, no, I do think it’s become difficult because you’re dealing with like Ayanna and Nichelle said a lack of experience that really is – you can’t miss it. You’re dealing with people who are coming there as a sense of entitlement. TV has exploded in a way, I don’t know if any industry has exploded the same way. It is more than double than what it was seven years ago.

**Craig:** No question.

**Malcolm:** Right? Which means if that many new jobs are occurring the vetting system must be different. And expectation for writers coming in it’s obviously going to be a little bit less – what’s the word – like the fight isn’t the same because the fucking industry just blew up. And so these people walk into your room not having suffered the way pretty much all of us on this stage have. And the way they carry themselves is not appropriate.

**Craig:** They haven’t been broken down completely yet.

**Malcolm:** They’ve got no sense of regard for what you’ve done. And so now I think the backlash that’s coming – I don’t think we’re the only ones – is people are starting to say, “Fuck that. Let me groom my own youngsters and bring in people who I think are solid.” Cause these other people coming in from the outside are not built right.

**Craig:** They don’t get it.

**Malcolm:** They’re not built right, yeah.

**Craig:** And there’s not the respect that’s required.

**David Mandel:** We had it both ways on Veep. One I guess success story and one I guess not. Which was my first season, taking over the show sort of midway, I mostly went with veterans. I wanted people I felt – because I felt like we weren’t going to get a lot of wiggle room. That people had expectations. And so there wasn’t a lot of room, but I did hire a staff writer and I realize I’m going to keep it somewhat vague, although obviously you can look it up.

And it didn’t work out.

**Craig:** Right now if you want to, by the way.

**David Mandel:** But I’ll leave it at that. It did not work out. It was just not a good year. And I blame myself partially. The job was overwhelming. I did not have the opportunity to mentor this person the way I hoped I would. And a couple of the other senior writers tried to step in. And, I don’t know. It didn’t work.

However, we had a writer’s PA who is a stand up in her own world and in one of the stages of Veep, I guess for lack of a better word I just “gather-alls.” Like when we’re doing a scene, I just get them and I get them anonymously. I mean, they’re just handed to me by writer’s assistants. And I just go through them and I’m mixing and matching and adding my own stuff. And I don’t know whose is what. Best joke wins. That’s all I care about.

And at some point like a year into it someone said, “Amelia is getting a lot on. I mean, just jokes and stuff.” And it was just sort of like fantastic. And when we came back we made her a staff writer. And I think for her it did help that she had been around the room. Someone mentioned room etiquette, whatever. I think that she had learned—

**Craig:** The culture.

**David Mandel:** Not just rooms in general, but she had learned our room to our extent. And she’s off on her career and I couldn’t be more happy. So it does work both ways. But it’s hard. You bump into people that have the exec-producer credit and you just cannot believe that they have it. I don’t know what else to say.

**Craig:** Right. I know it’s something that you used to have to – that was the height. You know, you finally climbed to the top of the mountain. And now they’re just sort of—

**Dan:** Are you talking about us? Is he talking about us?

**Craig:** Pretty much. Yeah. We’ll get to you in a minute. But first I want to talk a little bit more with Dave Mandel down there. Because Dave when it comes to television you’ve had a remarkable run. It’s rare to just keep winning. It’s actually frustrating to me.

**David Mandel:** Let the record show my movie credits are just shit.

**Craig:** I was going to go through those. But, first, it seems to me that at some point there’s more than just talent going on. What do you think is the secret to making what I think is the hardest genre – comedy – to make it work time and time again almost without fail? What is going on there?

**David Mandel:** I guess from my perspective and I was really – I was very lucky at Saturday Night Live to work under some just incredible people. At Saturday Night Live Al Franken was kind of my mentor and then a man named Jim Downy, which if you know Saturday Night live maybe people know the legend of—

**Craig:** The great Jim Downy. You guys know him as the guy who says, “What you just said may be the stupidest thing.” That guy.

**David Mandel:** And he was also the change bank guy. But he literally might be the funniest human being on earth. And most of anything you kind of ever liked on Saturday Night Live from Strategery to Fred Garvin Male Prostitute was Jim Downy. And I learned, I mean I was there for three years. And to this day I write a joke and I think to myself that’s a Jim joke, that’s an Al joke, you know, those pieces of it.

And then when I got to Seinfeld, Larry really taught me to write a show, an outline. And he had learned basically because he had never worked on a traditional sitcom. So he was not taught in a room by that – just to be clear, comedy rooms are very different than your guys’ rooms. Comedy rooms are atrocious. Comedy rooms are group thought and group write. And I do all the work but it’s your turn to write it so you write it, even though I did all the work. You know, what seems funny at 2am where you’re watching a show going, “What?”

And so that stuff, that structure, those lessons that those of us that were there getting those lessons, I think that’s what we sort of went out and did. And, I don’t know, that’s what has carried me through I feel like.

**Craig:** Well, it has certainly worked. Now, you two, since you were so insistent, Dan. You guys I think better than pretty much anybody that I’ve ever experienced as a television watcher made me enjoy and dread anticipation. I mean, my heart legitimately would race at the beginning of a new season of Game of Thrones. I don’t know if – I’m not that jaded. I mean, I would get so excited. And I would get so excited to see how the season would end.

And that anticipation it feels like is kind of maybe going away. It’s something that obviously networks still do. They show something once a week. HBO still does it. They show something once a week. But even for stuff like HBO/networks, there’s also the option to just wait and binge it. And then for Netflix there is not option. It’s just there it all is. Do you think that the binge model or the unenforced anticipation is something that is going to change the way you actually approach things creatively as you go forward?

**Dan:** Speaking for me, I don’t think so. I mean, I think you want to tell a story. Your episode you want to be the best episode it can be. Your season you want to be the best season it can be. I don’t think it would really – you’re trying to game the system to try to hook people into – you’re doing that anyway by the nature of the medium. Like yeah, you do an episode of television, you want someone to watch the next episode of television. But I don’t think – I’m speaking for me, slightly speaking for us, not speaking for the companies that we work for because they may have different agendas – but will it change the way that TV is experienced by us, like the big us? Will it change the way that these stories affect us as a whole? Without question.

I mean, what you’re talking about is a group phenomenon. It’s a societal phenomenon. Something shows up and you watch it, or you don’t, and then you discuss it with the people you care about the next day. And we’ve all felt that changing.

**Craig:** It’s kind of replacing the water cooler. So the water cooler was, “Did you see blankety-blank last night?” And now the water cooler is, “Have you watched this series yet?”

**Dan:** And this is an HBO show I’m referencing now, not even a binge show. But like Succession.

**Craig:** Yeah. That feels like a water cooler show.

**Dan:** Which is a water cooler show. And yet even that, which is a water cooler show that is released week by week. We were at dinner tonight talking about it and he’s like, “I’m on this episode. I’m on that episode.” Half of the table is plugging their ears when somebody else talks about the thing they haven’t seen.

**Liz:**It was you. You were plugging your ears.

**Dan:** I was plugging my ears. I was talking to myself.

**Craig:** You’re not half the table. You’re just one man.

**Liz:**Earmuffs.

**Dan:** In my mind I was half the table.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**Dan:** And that experience extrapolated out to what does it mean when everybody watches things at their own pace, that’s going to change the group experience. No question.

**Craig:** Do you feel any difference in terms of – or even any kind of sense of loss of that model? Because it seems like it’s going to just go away completely.

**David Benioff:** Well, I don’t know. We’ve argued about that, right? I mean, Malcolm thinks it’ll come back.

**Malcolm:** [Unintelligible].

**Craig:** Well, go ahead Malcolm.

**Dan:** You think it’s coming back.

**Craig:** Is there another “fuck ‘em” in our future?

**Malcolm:** No, but it’s not going away. And you could always binge HBO shows. It’s just Netflix doing that shit. And no one else – the people who are about to possibly eat their lunch–

**Craig:** Disney+.

**Malcolm:** As we’re talking about, they’ll release a couple in a row. But they have all separately decided that week-to-week is more bang for your buck. Marketing. It extends the conversation.

**Nichelle:** Apple will release three episodes and then go week to week.

**Craig:** Really?

**Nichelle:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Is that news? Did you just break some news? Because I haven’t heard that. Well, that should send the stock moving up or down. I don’t know which one. But that’s a fascinating model. It’s the crack model. Let’s face it, it’s crack.

Apple is a crack dealer. We know that. That’s brilliant.

**Malcolm:** I was just saying that’s all of Hulu, Disney+, Apple, all using pretty much the exact same model.

**David Benioff:** With three?

**Malcolm:** Two or three.

**Craig:** So two or three, and then they go week to week. So obviously they see something inherently valuable in that kind of dribs and drabs.

**Malcolm:** We’re all fighting about this by the way.

**Craig:** It is amazing. The fights that go on. It’s gorgeous. Liz, please go ahead.

**Liz:**I also want to say it has to do with what the point of what you’re releasing is. Because if you’re releasing something and it’s episodic based and you are breaking it episodically and you are telling the story that way in a very strictly – I’m using quotes – as we know television format, then yes, that works.

If you’re breaking something that you’re using 10 hours of television to be released that way then that doesn’t necessarily work. That is why Netflix exists. That is why you’re saying whatever the three and six or full drop on Hulu or whatever it is works. Like I think there is a benefit to this fluctuating system we have as storytellers to say like Mindhunter is maybe the slowest burn ever. And so – for me personally, in a positive way. And I don’t think it would ever be built to be as a weekly drop. And would ever be built as a three and then multiple drop. And that’s intentional. And that’s from the top down.

And so I think you have to look at it creatively from the beginning of like what is the story you’re telling. How do you want this to be told? And how do you want to tell it? And then say where are we going to release it from there.

**Dan:** Malcolm, I think that’s a really good answer.

**Craig:** Malcolm just smiled. That’s a terrible smile. I’ve seen it before. It’s horrible. Only terrible things come after it. Dave, I think you were going to say something.

**David Mandel:** Oh, I had a shitty HBO Max joke that I was going to try.

**Craig:** No better time to workshop it than now.

**David Mandel:** It was going to be – they’ve got a different plan. It’s going to be $50 a month and it’s only going to be on DIRECTV. And it’s going to be really something special. HBO Max. See me if you want to sign up afterwards. It’s not bad. Not great. But yeah.

**Craig:** It’s on the way, man. I feel like that’s on the way. If you had a choice, Ayanna, if you had a choice, just like Liz is saying. Some shows want to be one thing, some shows want to be another. But Netflix is like this is how we do it. And HBO goes this is how we do it. If you had a choice, what’s your druthers? You want it all out there, or do you want to kind of go the week by week? Because I can see positives in either direction.

**Ayanna:** I just watched this show on Netflix called Rhythm and Flow. It was great. It was a rap competition. Did you guys see it?

**Craig:** Yeah, it was cool.

**Ayanna:** I liked the way they released it. They did three episodes every week. So they did—

**Craig:** OK, so they’re coming up with new plans now.

**Ayanna:** Six, nine. Yeah. I think I like that. I think week to week, I don’t know, I have a touch of ADD.

**Craig:** Just a touch.

**Ayanna:** Yeah. [laughs]

**Craig:** [speaks in French].

**Ayanna:** I don’t like the idea that – I want to be in the conversation. I don’t like the conversation to be ahead of the conversation or behind the conversation. But I think somewhere like in the middle.

**Craig:** You know, I think these compromise solutions are really interesting because the only thing that I’ve ever thought about this releasing stuff, just because television up until I guess five years ago was released exactly one way. Week by week by week. And there is – so it’s interesting to look at what this means. And the only thing that I think is that if you release it all at once there is a sort of implied devaluation of the material. And so I really like this kind of hybrid model, where they’re sort of acknowledging, look, you’re all too impatient to wait.

**Ayanna:** But I will say that something like Chernobyl, like what was it six episodes?

**Craig:** Five.

**Ayanna:** Five. OK.

**Liz:** Who wrote Chernobyl?

**Craig:** Yeah, yeah. Yeah, I did that. I did that.

**Dan:** That wasn’t funny. It wasn’t funny.

**Liz:** Was that the half-hour sitcom on Fox?

**Craig:** We brought in Mandel and he just killed it. I mean, just all the funny. Yeah.

**Ayanna:** But something like that, I say week to week.

**Craig:** It seemed to help us, week to week.

**Ayanna:** I say week to week. Five episodes or a shorter order.

**Craig:** Well that was kind of heavy, wasn’t it? I mean, it’s like who wants to watch all that at once?

**David Benioff:** I would say there’s also an argument that it doesn’t matter that much. You know? I came to Breaking Bad really late because we were in the middle of making Thrones. And I didn’t get to it until I think the final season was split into two. And between the first half of the final season and the second was when I started watching it. And then I just became an addict and was watching an episode on the way to set on the iPad, in the back seat, and then on the way back from set. And just blew threw it in a couple weeks. And then had to wait for the final half of the season where I watched them in real time with everybody. And watching it both ways was incredible. And at the end of the day it’s because Breaking Bad was fucking great.

And so, you know, the argument is interesting and it’s professionally very interesting to us, but I don’t know if there’s necessarily an answer. Or it’s just if the show is good enough–

**Craig:** Then it doesn’t really matter.

**Dan:** I think this matters more to the people who aren’t us. Or should matter more to the people who aren’t in this room and the people who aren’t us. I’m not saying we spend no time thinking about it. We spend–

**Craig:** Not a lot of time.

**Dan:** Tiny bit of time thinking about it. But honestly like I don’t give a shit.

**Craig:** It’s not in the forefront of your mind. I mean, I’ll tell you, Dave, I actually watched Breaking Bad almost exactly the same way you did. And I take your point. I think maybe I suppose you could say the fact that it was released week by week helped it become what it was. So it helped people–

**David Benioff:** Also Netflix helped it become what it was.

**Craig:** Well, exactly.

**Malcolm:** We have [unintelligible], let’s be clear about that.

**Dan:** That’s how we all – a lot of us that’s how we all experienced it.

**Craig:** That’s how my 14-year-old daughter has watched every episode of Friends, a show that was made well before she was born. So it is transforming things.

**David Benioff:** But Vince Gilligan—

**Liz:**But I guess I don’t understand why we’re having the argument or having—

**Craig:** We’re not having an argument.

**Liz:**Not an argument.

**Dan:** Because we have an hour to kill.

**Liz:**Settle down right now. It’s just like why don’t we look at it as there is a plethora of options. And let’s make content we want to make and let’s find the place to make it. And find the place that will let us make it the way we want to make it.

**Craig:** Well, the good news is there’s more of those places than ever.

**David Mandel:** Sorry, just to make an actual real point. I truly meant the shit I have been saying, not what you were saying. But I was going to say, not a joke, I do think the week to week model allows you to grow into a show. And there are shows where I think if they were just dumped out there and you were only given the binge option and there was either – and I’m not talking about a situation where you’re binging late and other people are saying to you, “No, no, no, stick with it. Get at least to episode four,” that there are certain shows that develop, sort of figure themselves out a little slower and there is something – I guess I am a fan of the traditional version.

**Craig:** I think Succession is like that. It kind of found itself.

**David Mandel:** Yeah, Succession, I definitely said to people give it a couple to get there and I guess I would worry about the, oh no, because again in that short attention span just turning it off.

**Craig:** Well that was a great not-argument that we had, Liz. I thought.

**Liz:** To make a real point, I think Dave is right.

**Craig:** Yep. Can’t go wrong with that.

**David Mandel:** Look, let’s just agree to fuck it, OK? Fuck it.

**Liz:** Fuck it.

**Craig:** Fuck it. We’re going to play a couple of quick games and then we’re going to turn it over to the audience for some questions. This game is a real easy one. It’s just run by me and I judge it. It’s called How Do You Follow That Up?

**David Mandel:** What’s it called?

**Craig:** How Do You Follow That Up? Dave Mandel, Veep is over. How do you follow that up?

**David Mandel:** No, this is exciting. I’m doing one of the Game of Thrones spinoffs.

**Craig:** Works. Malcolm, you were on Empire. It’s a show that nobody expected to be a massive hit. Massive hit. You’re on a Marvel show, you’re following it up.

**Malcolm:** I followed up.

**Craig:** You followed up. You’re already following up. You have no problems whatsoever. Nichelle, I saw the trailer. You’re following up. Have you guys seen the trailer for Truth Be Told? Yeah, she’s following it up. I’m going to go over to you, Ayanna. Cotton Club.

**Ayanna:** I told you, it’s Dead-ish.

**Craig:** Ish. Ish. Is there any chance? Because I think it’s a movie that would be perfect to serialize in television.

**Ayanna:** I love Cotton Club. It’s a great script, if I may say so myself. But it’s having some challenges in the marketplace right now. I am following it up with something else, but I can’t talk about it.

**Craig:** OK, so you’re following it up though is the point.

**Ayanna:** Yes I am. Yes.

**Craig:** I’ll get to the two of you in a second. Liz, The Post. Boom. Mindhunter. Boom. How are you going to follow that up?

**Liz:** I’m going to work for these guys.

**Craig:** All right, all right. So let’s get to these guys. You guys did Game of Thrones. The biggest television show of all time. No show could possibly be bigger or better than it. It is impossible to do anything better than you’ve already done. How are you going to follow that up? How are you going to follow it up? Please speak directly to Netflix executives. [laughs] How are you going to follow this up?

**Ayanna:** He said, “Fuck it.”

**Craig:** That’s a great answer. Malcolm has given us our best answer. Now we have – this is a cute little game.

**David Benioff:** What about you? Craig Mazin, Craig Mazin, you wrote and show-run Chernobyl, the greatest limited series according to IMDb. The highest first television foray ever.

**Craig:** Yes, I made one television show.

**David Benioff:** Best writing Emmy and best producing Emmy.

**Dan:** Saw him double fisting it.

**Liz:**Best beard. Best beard.

**Dan:** They call him Double-fisting Mazin.

**David Benioff:** A lot of people say the greatest limited series in history.

**Craig:** Yeah. Thank you. So.

**David Benioff:** How are you going to follow that up, Craig?

**Craig:** Fukushima. [laughs] Obviously. Guys, it’s a simple search and replace.

**Liz:** John is so mad right now.

**Craig:** So easy. OK, we’ve been drinking. So, before we get to you guys, this is a real game. So – that wasn’t a real game. My friend David Kwong who is a magician and puzzle genius and I put together a little puzzle competition for people and this is one of the puzzles that we played. But this is a movie – it’s going to be fine. This is movie quotes. You guys should be able to nail this. If you know it, don’t say it until they all fail.

**Liz:**Is this like Jeopardy? Do we ring in?

**Craig:** Just raise your hand.

**Liz:**We’re very competitive, so I just need to know.

**Craig:** I think just you are. So we’re going to raise our hand. I’m going to give you a movie quote that I’ve just changed all the words but the meaning is still there.

**David Benioff:** Ayanna is looking. She’s looking.

**Craig:** Ayanna is falling asleep.

**Ayanna:** No, I’m getting gum.

**Craig:** Oh, you’re getting gum. OK, here we go. We’ll start you off with an easy one. “My intention is to suggest an undeniable proposition.”

**David Benioff:** An Offered Proposal?

**Liz:** Indecent Proposal?

**David Mandel:** Godfather? An offer he can’t refuse.

**Craig:** Yes, I’m going to make you an offer you can’t refuse. Godfather. See, this is easy. Don’t get too thrilled about it.

“I am completely superior to the famous and large primate of mythology.”

**Malcolm:** King Kong ain’t got nothing on me.

**Craig:** Yes. Yes. Yes.

**Liz:** Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.

**Dan:** Are you changing words?

**Craig:** Are you shitting me?

**David Benioff:** I thought he was changing words.

**Craig:** Dude, you made Game of Thrones. Did you just ask that question?

**Liz:** I’m curious about the quote.

**Craig:** It’s much worse than that.

**Liz:** I just want to know what the real quote is that you’re rearranging.

**Craig:** The real quote, it’s actually King Kong ain’t got shit on me.

**Liz:** Right, so what did you just say?

**Craig:** I am completely superior to the famous and large primate of mythology.

**Liz:** Right, so that’s not the same words.

**Craig:** Wow. All right, let’s just talk about what it means to play a game. Let’s just go back to that. It’s a game.

**Liz:** I didn’t know that these were the rules. I thought I was rearranging words. And now—

**Craig:** If I just said, “King Kong ain’t got shit on me,” and someone said, “I know it. It’s King Kong ain’t got shit on me.” This would be the worst game ever.

**Liz:** I didn’t know the rules. And now I feel prepared. Thank you.

**Craig:** So here we go. Number three.

**Liz:** A lot of stakes.

**Craig:** “My choice is now identical to hers.” Nothing? Nothing? Nothing? To the audience?

**Audience:** I’ll have what she’s having.

**Craig:** So much smarter than you guys.

**Liz:** What was it?

**Craig:** I’ll have what she’s having. Harry Met Sally. OK, super easy one. “Greet my diminutive companion.”

**Male Voice:** Say hello to my little friends.

**Craig:** Say hello to my little friends. Perfect. This is my favorite one. No, the last one is my favorite one.

**David Mandel:** Wait a second. You’re changing the words?

**Liz:** Thank you! Thank you!

**Craig:** Professional timing. You see how professional he is? He just waited there.

**Liz:** Well Dave was just weighing in with a real opinion. So.

**Craig:** He was like in the towner, like Barry Pepper waiting to shoot me in the head.

**Liz:** Is that Saving Private Ryan?

**Craig:** Yes. Different game.

**Liz:** You’re welcome. Do I get a point for that one?

**Craig:** No. “This metaphorical infant shall not be positioned at the junction of two walls by any person.”

**David Benioff:** No one puts baby in a corner.

**Craig:** Yes! Dirty Dancing.

**David Mandel:** What was it?

**Craig:** No one puts baby in a corner. Dirty Dancing.

**Liz:**If you have to ask the entire audience, Craig.

**David Benioff:** Are you going to name this game?

**Craig:** Yeah, it’s named Awesomeness. No, I’m not naming it.

**David Benioff:** OK, all right. “Add protective coating, remove protective coating.”

**Liz:** Wax on, wax off. Wax on, wax off.

**Craig:** Yeah! I got your number, Liz. You’re the kind of person who is like, “This game sucks. This game sucks. I’m winning! I love it.”

**Liz:** Fuck you all. I got one.

**Craig:** Last one, and then we go to audience. “Farewell, woman whose name is the feminine version of Felix.” Audience?

**Audience:** Bye Felicia.

**Craig:** Bye Felicia. Jealous.

**Liz:** Is that a movie quote?

**Craig:** Oh my god. Friday. OK. We’ll do some Q&A and you can ask any one of these brilliant people any question you want and I will compel them to answer. Begin. Yes ma’am.

**Female Audience Member:** Hi, my name is Kiana.

**Craig:** Hi Kiana.

**Female Audience Member:** And my question was for the TV writers and with the media landscape changing how do you translate experience in other arenas into experience for a room and conversely how do you take that writers’ room experience you guys are talking about in areas that aren’t like an actual writers’ room? How do you translate – do that in the real world, the world outside of writers’ rooms?

**Craig:** So you’re learning lessons in the writers’ room, you’re learning lessons in life, how do these kind of feed into each other? You’re all professional writers, so feel free to–?

**Malcolm:** The first half I think I got. It takes practice to start to understand that each person usually has lived – very few people have not lived a worthwhile life. The gap when you walk into a writers’ room, you have to get into the habit of paying attention to where the story is going and naturally knowing that maybe a story about the way your mom cooked a meal, or the way your church did something different from other churches applies to that story. So I guess what I’m saying is everyone has that reservoir and if you are a storyteller there is still one more learned skillset which is – here’s what the answer is. You pay attention to how the more senior people are mining their personal lives and then you very quickly start to understand, oh shit, well, I remember my brother and me used to go fishing at this thing and dot-dot-dot and you’ll start to see how that ritual of pulling your own life and applying it to other people’s stories comes.

**David Mandel:** I was just going to say, when we used to hire people on Seinfeld literally the hiring process was just give us a list of ideas by characters. Kramer ideas. Elaine ideas. George ideas. And you’d go through the list and they’d all be terrible and you’d get to one, and I don’t know, it would be like, “A fight with an Uber driver.” Whatever it is. And you’d go this one is really funny. This really happened, right? The rest, you were a writer sitting at home trying to think of what was funny, but this was something real that you’re now extrapolating on. And they’d be like, “How do you know?” And it’s like, well, it’s the only funny one.

And Seinfeld and Curb and to this day on my iPhone, even though I haven’t worked a Curb in a couple of years, I have just my Curb list of things that happen that I write down and then I’ll either give them to Larry or I’ll figure out a way to use them for something else. But that reality – and obviously taking it somewhere. That’s obviously also the hard part. But to start to identify these things that could be something.

Very quickly, you also have to learn what a story is. And there’s no other way of saying that. And, again, to talk about people in LA, like a story is not a location. A story is not just something that happened or something that someone said. A story is a story. And you do have to figure that out. But you can mine your life. And that’s where I think a lot of that certainly from a comedy standpoint that comedy reality comes from, for me.

**Craig:** Ayanna, you were going to jump in there.

**Ayanna:** Oh, no, I was just looking at Malcolm when he was talking because we worked on Empire together. And remember “move the table?” That’s a great way to mine. I’m not saying that because it was my idea. But, and it never made it in the show.

**Craig:** Tell us about this. What’s “move the table?”

**Malcolm:** It’s a perfect example actually because it was specific to Ayanna’s experience and that specificity made everything great. So Lucious and Andre I think were about to fight. And the room was hemming and hawing about how to make this scene and interesting and how the characters would react. And Ayanna brought up an anecdote from her life and applied it – and the way it basically manifested, because I’m going to ruin the story or whatever, was that it was like what would Cookie who was the star of the show do. And Ayanna was like, oh yeah, she tells a story where basically it’s like, oh well, if y’all about to fight up in here move that table out of the way and don’t fuck up my furniture. And the entire room, it was like what you were saying about comedy, the entire room knew that was the pitch.

**Craig:** Because it was real.

**Malcolm:** Because it was specific and it felt real. Yeah, it brought it all together.

**Ayanna:** And scene.

**Craig:** Best answer possible.

**Ayanna:** It never made it.

**Craig:** And it never made it in. But now all these people know. Yes, ma’am right there.

**Female Audience Member:** Hi, my name is Annie and Ayanna I really appreciated how you had mentioned reaching out to Nichelle to talk about a pitch. Because as a writer and creator of color I’ve noticed that there’s this idea that there can only be one of us when it comes to like marginalized communities and breaking in. So I wanted to know if you or any of the non-white men on the panel can talk a little bit—

**Craig:** I’m Jewish. Doesn’t count. Yeah, the racists have told me. I’m good. Sorry, go on.

**Female Audience Member:** I wanted to know if you could speak a little bit about how we can be collaborative and build community and not see each other as competitors but more as allies.

**Craig:** Great question. What do you think?

**David Mandel:** I find the best collaboration—

**Craig:** Oh my god!

**David Mandel:** I’m sorry. I’m sorry.

**Craig:** Why do you have to be so professionally funny? You’re so lucky John is not here. Because John would have been like, “No, no, you didn’t hear. She said…she was very clear who she wanted to hear from.”

To the non-white writers up here, any answer to the excellent question?

**Nichelle:** Well, it’s a little bit about building a community. You know, and you can be a good writer, but you can also be a good friend. And when you meet people that you admire and appreciate, when there’s an opportunity to work with them you take it. And when I was on Good Wife, which was a great room, and I think my second year there another woman joined the staff, Erica Shelton Kodish, and that was the first time I’d ever been in a room with another black woman. And that was my fourth show. And it wasn’t because they weren’t there, it was just this weird twist of fate that they left the year I got there. And so it was weirdly like I met some of them afterwards and we kind of joke like, oh, I replaced you.

But I don’t think it’s that sinister, frankly. And one of the things about it is when I was staffing Truth Be Told my first instinct was to only hire my friends. Because there’s first time showrunner, first time network, it was a little bit terrifying. And so I wanted people around me that I could trust. That meant those were people that I worked with before. My husband. Or writers that I knew in different ways. And so I had to tell myself do not fill this entire room with your friends. Someone gave you an opportunity 10 years ago, so you have to leave seats open at the table.

So you just have to be committed to it. And it was a little bit scary, because I didn’t know, oh my god, this person is going to come in and join the room and they’re not going to be able to take my jokes. Malcolm’s “fuck it” attitude. Whatever it is. And you just have to trust and be open. And if it doesn’t work you just cut bait.

**Ayanna:** Yeah. My first show was in 2000. It was a show called Gideon’s Crossing with Andre Braugher. Paul Attanasio created the show. Eric Overmyer was the showrunner. And I was a staff writer. And there was an upper level black female biracial woman, Samantha Corbin Miller, who actually looked out for me. So, one, I come from a family of black women and so camaraderie among black women comes natural to me, but also during my professional career like she shielded me. She would talk to the showrunner or talk to the creator and say, “Hey, she’s got a good pitch. Listen to her in the room.” So she would have those conversations so that I could speak. Because back in those days you really didn’t speak. You were just there to learn, right?

And so that spirit, you know, I’ve carried on every show, even when I’m the only one. So, I think it’s either in your to do that or it’s not. I don’t think it’s something, I mean, I guess you could teach it, but I don’t know.

**Craig:** Well, it seems like there’s a paying it forward thing kind of going here. Somebody does it for you and you feel obligated to do it for them. Liz, do you feel that way in any way, shape, or form in that regard?

**Liz:** I had a really interesting experience. I mean, I met a lot of – in television I met a lot of female showrunners because I did this sort of random female showrunner panel a year ago. And all of them really kept in touch with me. And I just feel like it’s also that I call them. So, that is the advice I would give. I ask them what I should do and what they think of the people that I’m going to work with. Or what they think of the people that I could work with or what I should do. And they coach me.

And so the group of people that you choose to surround yourself with regardless of gender, but in my case has been a group of women, is something that I will appreciate forever.

**Craig:** Great. All right. We’ve got some more questions here. Yes, you’re right here. You’re literally right here. It’s too easy. Go for it.

**Male Audience Member:** My name is Phillip. We’ve noticed in the movies that it’s more and more especially with the big movies they’re looking – producers and studios are looking at existing IPs to adapt. It feels like that trend is starting to creep into television. Obviously Falcon and Winter Soldier and Game of Thrones and now its spinoffs. Is that something that is tangible to you? I mean, do you see that growing?

**Malcolm:** This is something we talk about a lot. I think every – IPs are awesome. They help. But I also got – I got into the movie business just as it was just becoming obsessive. The idea that there used to be a spec market in features meant there was a market for fresh, original ideas. And that died. So they literally didn’t want them. It is definitely coming into TV. I unfortunately don’t think there’s any stopping it. If you look at – if you ask people their favorite shows, right, they’re going to say The Wire, Sopranos, Breaking Bad. All original ideas. I’m hoping.

And I think that’s quickly starting to be constricted. And with event television coming in, you know what I’m saying, it’s just going to accelerate. It doesn’t mean every show has to be an event show, but the idea that event television will be IP-driven will create a narrative that exacerbates it. So I think it’s a real concern. It’s unstoppable. And it will eventually have the same negative on TV that we’re all doing.

**Liz:** Is that a “fuck it?”

**Craig:** Yeah, so another lukewarm opinion from Malcolm Spellman. No, no, I mean, look, I kind of – the only thing I would disagree with is the volume at least right now, the volume of television is so remarkable that you can put things on the air that are just, I mean, the idea that Russian Doll. That’s a show that doesn’t exist in any other reality except this one right now. Where there’s room for something like that. That is so original.

**Liz:** It arguably exists in multiple realities.

**Craig:** Well, yes. Actually, that was the first possible example I could have used for a show that doesn’t exist in multiple – yes. But there is a lot of really original television that’s happening right now because there’s an enormous amount of room. Where I do agree with you is if that room should contract—

**Malcolm:** Which it—

**Craig:** OK, you and I have an agreement on this.

**David Benioff:** Yeah. But we’re in the Death Star trash compactor. And right now we’re at peak TV. We’ve got, what is it, 500 and something show being made in 2019.

**Craig:** Good lord. Wow.

**David Benioff:** But the walls are going to start closing in.

**Craig:** They will.

**David Benioff:** Because no one is making – a few people are making money, but not everyone is going to be making money off of 500 shows. Most of those shows are not going to be profitable. So someone is going to win, but a lot of people are going to lose. And 10 years from now what’s, you know, what’s it going to be? 200 shows? I don’t know. But it won’t be 500.

**Craig:** No. And I think when that happens the general tendency is to get safer. We know that. And so enjoy it while it’s lasting. It’s pretty cool right now.

**David Benioff:** And especially this goes back to Phillip’s original question is things are getting much more expensive. Television has gotten so expensive. And—

**Craig:** Was there one show that you think drove the price up? Just wondering. How about that, Mandel? Fuck you. I’ve still got it. [laughs] He’s fantastic. I’m amazed that Mandel is still awake, by the way. Usually he’s out like a light halfway through this thing.

**David Benioff:** But if you’re going to pitch something to a feature executive and it’s going to be a $300 million movie, it’s really hard now to do an original as you’re saying. It’s almost impossible. And it’s getting more like that with television, with the big budget television. Because if they’re going to invest this much money they want to believe there’s something out there, there’s some fan base out there, whether it’s a comic book, or a novel, or whatever it is. Which is exactly what it’s been for features for a long time.

**Dan:** Going back to that model, so I’m just trying to not romanticize the past. The movies that built us, or that built us, like Star Wars an original and Jaws was an adaptation. And The Godfather was IP. And The Wizard of Oz is IP. And Taxi Driver is an original. It’s a mixed bag down the line. I’m just not sure – and I understand that there’s a certain amount of self-interest in this response, because we’re here because of something that George Martin made. Like if he had not written those books we wouldn’t be sitting here on this panel with you.

But I just – on some level there is room for everything and the pendulum is going to swing one way or another. But I just think about the things that meant the most to me and lots of them came from other things.

**Craig:** That’s a good point.

**David Mandel:** I worry less about IP because it’s such a broad term. And I guess I’m less bothered by books than I am I guess videogames or something like that. So I guess to me not all IP is created equal.

**Craig:** Wow.

**David Mandel:** Yeah, I know.

**Dan:** But there’s never been a great videogame movie.

**Liz:**Well, The Last of Us is excellent. Let’s calm down right now. In the defense of videogames, there is one great videogame that does exist.

**David Mandel:** There’s one great videogame, The Post. And it was really good. But, no, I was going to say—

**Liz:**It was so dope when Ben Bradley argued with Nixon.

**Craig:** Level 7 of The Post is impossible.

**Liz:**And you role played with him for so long.

**David Mandel:** But I do worry about, and I guess IP is a part of it, but I do worry as these brands, the streamers kind of retreat to their own stuff, which I know I’m not explaining it well. That’s my bigger I think fear.

**Craig:** You mean like Disney is just—

**David Mandel:** They’re so on brand that there’s not room for anything else. And then the other ones in response to that starting to feel a little bit like they’re also doing the same. Where you start to kind of hear the plans for things like the NBC/Universal one and it’s very I guess for lack of a better word NBC/Universal-ish.

**Craig:** On brand.

**David Mandel:** And part of that is the IP they own. But I do worry that that’s the conservativeness.

**Dan:** That’s what the studio system in the ‘30s, ‘40s, and ‘50s was.

**David Mandel:** It was. There were five. Gangster studio. Exactly. Romance studio. R-studio.

**Dan:** Where the Warners were tough. And MGM was family.

**Liz:**Well that’s what we’re going to now. I mean, and but like why – I guess I feel like repeating myself, but why are we still talking about this idea of something existing that—

**David Mandel:** You seem to think this conversation is dumb.

**Liz:**I do. I do. I do. I don’t think it’s dumb.

**Craig:** You said “I do” three times.

**David Benioff:** I do. I do. I don’t.

**Craig:** I do. I do. I do. I do.

**Liz:**But, no, I think it is dumb to predict or try to predict or try to anticipate what this industry is going to do. We have endured – or not even endured. Endured feels like something you put on your shoulders. But just witnessed a lot of changes in this industry in just five years. That’s five years of change.

**Craig:** So in five years from now, who the hell knows?

**Liz:**So in five years who knows what’s going to happen? So why?

**David Mandel:** I agree with that, but I will say the following. You’re right. I think sitting here worrying about it is crazy. I think sitting at home and worrying about it is crazy. And certainly you’ve got to make what you believe in. So I’m with you on every part of that. But I will also say that when Seinfeld ended, which would have been ’98, and the writers from Seinfeld we all kind of went out into development world to create television just as the networks all lobbied and changed the rules in Washington so that the networks could own their own programming. And television got really shitty for a couple of years. Comedy especially. Because why would I put on your show when I can put on your terrible show that I own 100% of.

And I think writers stood there smiling, not worrying about it to the point of basically self-flagellation. Where we have a tendency as creative types – and again I don’t know what to do it about it. And I’m not saying we should spend all our time on it. I do worry about these things because I think writers have a tendency to ignore some of these sometimes very big picture ideas that have created these monumental changes. I mean, you would go out and you would pitch and if you were at a place – like I had friends that were at DreamWorks that had no official affiliation at the time. You’d pitch and they’d go, “What do you like? Do you like this idea? We really like this idea. Who do you think should be in this? Michael J. Fox.” And they would literally go, “Well when you guys get Michael J. Fox, you call us.” Because no one was interested in anything they didn’t own unless it was extenuating circumstances.

And writers just sort of took it, just took those body blows. Anyway.

**Craig:** We’re going to squeeze in one more question. Is that OK? But obviously your question was shitty because nobody cared about it and we didn’t talk about it. Yeah, you’re right here so let’s go for it. Let’s finish it off with you.

**David Mandel:** Get up.

**Male Audience Member:** Avery like the ranch, white like the house. I wanted to know what your thoughts on when I have to vote for SAG Awards. So they send you these – speaking of binge watching. Yeah, the screeners that are like, man, you only have this amount of time. But the screeners, you know what I mean? So it’s like you can get stuck on one series and you’re technically like eliminating someone else without even really giving them the same amount of time.

**Craig:** Is your question how to vote for an award?

**Male Audience Member:** No, well, how do they feel about that window that we’re given, which is small.

**Craig:** So the larger question here if I may expand it to everybody that isn’t voting for SAG Awards.

**Male Audience Member:** Do it.

**Craig:** Thank you. Is – and I feel this all the time. I don’t know about you guys. But in this era now there is almost an anxiety. I cannot see everything I need to see, I want to see, I should see. Do we just have to deal with the fact that we can’t be completionists, I guess?

**Ayanna:** Yes.

**Craig:** Yes. That was a yes or no question. Yeah. I think Ayanna answered that. It’s yes.

**Liz:** I didn’t watch—

**Craig:** Chernobyl.

**Liz:** I mean, I watched Succession. I didn’t watch Chernobyl. No, obviously not.

**David Mandel:** Depressing.

**Liz:** It’s really sad. God.

**Craig:** It blew up. What are you going to do?

**Liz:** No, I didn’t watch Succession until the beginning of Season 2. And then I binge-watched it to spite my husband, because he was watching it. And then I finished it and was like, holy shit, all of a sudden I realized what everybody was talking about. They don’t know and you don’t know what I’m talking about, but it’s fine.

And then the thing that I actually felt the most – there was a cultural shift that happens and Succession, Game of Thrones is that. Succession was that. The biggest cultural shift I felt personally with my friend group was Fleabag. And—

**Craig:** Say that again.

**Liz:** Fleabag.

**Craig:** Fleabag, yeah. Of course.

**Liz:** I didn’t watch Fleabag Season 1 at the time it released. Fleabag Season 2 was coming out. Everybody was talking about it. And I was like, OK, I’ll watch Season 1. In all honesty I liked Season 1. I thought it was really good. I thought it was so well-written. Fleabag Season 2 is one of the most well-written things I’ve ever seen on television. Regardless of television, on screen, in all of it. And it was the thing I felt was culturally different in terms of being – at least for me, a woman – of what it was like to be around other women. Where every woman I was around was talking about Fleabag. And talking about what it was like to be in a relationship with a man like that. Or talking about what it was like to be in a relationship like that, regardless of gender.

So that was for me the most recent – I don’t remember the question. I’m sorry.

**Craig:** Well that was a good answer. Although “yes” was also a really good answer. I’ve got to say.

I think with that we’re all done. So, Scriptnotes is produced by Megana Rao. Yes. It is edited by Matthew Chilelli. Our outro this week is by a person to be determined. If you have an outro out there you can send us a link to ask@johnaugust.com. That’s also the place where you can send longer questions.

For shorter questions on Twitter, I’m @clmazin, and John August is @johnaugust. Are you on Twitter? What is your Twitter thing?

**Ayanna:** Wait, my husband did it.

**Craig:** Oh boy.

**Ayanna:** It’s @qu33nofdrama but the two Es are two 3s.

**Craig:** What the fuck?

**Ayanna:** He’s a scientist.

**Craig:** OK. That doesn’t explain that actually. You’re not on Twitter?

**David Benioff:** Fuck no.

**Craig:** Well, good. You’re not on Twitter. Smart. Twitter?

**Liz:** @itslizhannah.

**Craig:** @itslizhannah. Nichelle? Malcolm? No. Mandel?

**David Mandel:** @davidhmandel but all the Ds are Zs.

**Craig:** Professional comedian. You can find the show notes for this episode and all episodes at johnaugust.com. That’s also where you find the transcripts. We try and get them up about four days after the episode airs. You can find all the back episodes of the show at Scriptnotes.net. And you need to sign up there in order to use the Scriptnotes app for iOS or Android.

You can also download 50-episode seasons at store.johnaugust.com. And I get none of the money.

Austin, thank you so much for coming. I want to thank Ayanna Floyd. David Benioff. Dan Weiss. Liz Hannah. Nichelle Tramble. Malcolm Spellman. And David Mandel. And all the folks here at Austin. Thank you so much for coming and goodnight.

Links:

* [Ayanna Floyd](https://twitter.com/qu33nofdrama) on Twitter and [IMDB](https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0283234/)
* [Liz Hannah](https://twitter.com/itslizhannah) on Twitter and [IMDB](https://www.imdb.com/name/nm2176283/)
* [Nichelle Tramble Spellman](https://www.imdb.com/name/nm2838492/) on IMDB
* [Malcolm Spellman](https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1173259/) on IMDB
* [David Mandel](https://twitter.com/DavidHMandel) on Twitter and [IMDB](https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0541635/)
* [David Benioff](https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1125275/) on IMDB
* [D.B. Weiss](https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1888967/) on IMDB
* [John August](https://twitter.com/johnaugust) on Twitter
* [Craig Mazin](https://twitter.com/clmazin) on Twitter
* [John on Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/johnaugust/?hl=en)
* [Outro](http://johnaugust.com/2013/scriptnotes-the-outros) by Matthew Chilelli ([send us yours!](http://johnaugust.com/2014/outros-needed))

Email us at ask@johnaugust.com

You can download the episode [here](http://traffic.libsyn.com/scriptnotes/scriptnotes_ep_424_aff.mp3).

Scriptnotes, Ep 419: Professionalism

October 30, 2019 Scriptnotes Transcript

The original post for this episode can be found [here](https://johnaugust.com/2019/professionalism).

**John August:** Hello and welcome. My name is John August.

**Craig Mazin:** My Craig Mazin name is.

**John:** And this is Episode 419 of Scriptnotes. Craig, what is Scriptnotes?

**Craig:** Scriptnotes is a podcast about things that are interesting to screenwriters. And screenwriting.

**John:** Everything is mixed up today.

**Craig:** Yeah. I love it. It’s a Backwards Day. I like it.

**John:** This is the grab-baggiest of episodes. We’re going to be talking about everything from Emmys to elections, professionalism, to patronage. Lots of stuff, so let’s get into it.

Craig, this Sunday were the Emmys. I can’t believe this day has finally come. The Emmys were on Sunday. Unfortunately this is Friday that we’re recording this so we have no idea what happened on Sunday.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** So, I want to propose something.

**Craig:** Sure.

**John:** Let’s record both versions. Let’s record the versions where you had a spectacular Sunday where you won a bunch of awards, and then we’ll record the one where you didn’t.

**Craig:** Got it. We actually should record three. We should record Chernobyl wins an award for something, but I don’t win. I win, Chernobyl wins nothing.

**John:** Great. So let’s do the big sweep where you win and Chernobyl wins. You were there for two awards. You picked up both of those statues. I was so excited to see you up there on stage. I thought your speech was fantastic.

**Craig:** Aw, thank you.

**John:** I was just beaming with pride because listeners like me have been following this whole journey. And you were away from the show for a while and you made this thing. And it was great closure to see you up there on that stage. I’m so happy and proud for you.

**Craig:** Boy, John, it’s weird up there. It’s so surreal.

**John:** Well, I saw you took a beat.

**Craig:** Yes.

**John:** I saw you took a beat and just took it all in.

**Craig:** Yeah. I was thinking of you during that beat. And then, yeah, it’s just so weird. Boy, that room is so big and the lights are really bright in your eyes. And of course you’re worried that you’re not going to have enough time. They’re going to play you off the stage which they did/did not do. And, yeah, a great night. It didn’t matter. Win or lose you’re just happy to be there amongst your peers. [laughs]

**John:** Yeah. You can’t take away the fact that you made something amazing and to be just celebrated up there on the stage for it was just icing on the cake.

**Craig:** Well golly.

**John:** Next version, so you don’t win the writing award but you do win the limited series award. Craig, it’s hard to even call this a mixed outcome because like Best Limited Series, congratulations.

**Craig:** Sure. Thank you. You know what? At this point you try and parse the achievement of making a show into individual awards just doesn’t even make logical sense anymore. So, you just have to go, you know what? We were nominated for lots of stuff and we’re super proud of that. If you win anything that’s amazing, especially in a year like this where we had such incredible competition. Congrats to Ava DuVernay and When They See Us for all the awards that they picked up. I think that’s a pretty good prediction right there.

And but to all of the great shows in our category. I mean, what a year. So, you know who the real winners were John? Television watchers. [laughs]

**John:** Well absolutely. And I think the Best Limited Series acknowledges the fact that this thing would not exist if you had not had the idea – if you had not been surfing Wikipedia and finding this information about the Chernobyl disaster, thinking like this is potentially a show. So that award is your award and it all came from the writing.

**Craig:** Well, listen, that’s the wonderful thing about television is that the writers are in charge, which is probably why television is so much better than movies right now. You know, movies, take note.

**John:** Yes. And I thought you saying that in your awards acceptance speech was absolutely appropriate.

**Craig:** Pretty crazy, right? Like what a weird axe to grind.

**John:** At the Emmy Awards. All right, third option. So Sunday were the Emmys. You got to go and see all the celebration for your show which was nominated.

**Craig:** See other people win.

**John:** So, while I was disappointed not to see you up there on that stage, I love when they do the cutaway shots to the people in the audience as their names are called. And to see you there with Melissa was just great. And I was just really proud to see you there, honored for what you have made.

**Craig:** Well, John, as you know I got into writing so that I could be on television. Actually, you probably noticed, I don’t know if they cutaway beforehand or not, but right when they announced that Ava DuVernay kept winning everything you probably noticed me turn behind me, to the left of me, to the right of me, ahead of me – depending on how it goes – to find Alec Berg and sort of give him a, “Yeah, I get it, now I know what it feels like.” Because, you know, again, poor Alec. 21 nominations. 0 for 21. But side note, that’s a pretty decent prediction. I think, I’m not trying to jinx Alec. I think it’s going to be a tough road to hoe for him. But back to the alternate reality.

Yeah, but you know what? Honestly, we didn’t go in expecting to win anything and we were so proud of our crafts people, our below the line people that won lots of awards the week before. We felt great. And it was an amazing year for television and for limited series. Hats off to Ava. Great job on that series. Wonderful show. So, we’re pleased as punch that the season of awards is over.

**John:** Yes, for sure. But you also had one extra special visit that happened this last week. Apparently you got to meet the President of Ukraine?

**Craig:** I met the President of Ukraine. I visited him. So this is a fascinating thing. There’s a conference in Ukraine, it’s an annual conference called the Yalta European Summit. It used to take place in Yalta, which is in Crimea. It no longer does because Russia has invaded Crimea. So it is in Kiev, Ukraine. And it is attended by all sorts of – you know, John, we run in Hollywood circles, right. So we always feel like, ooh, look at this party. It’s got all of the hoo-ha people.

**John:** Oh, Natalie Portman.

**Craig:** Yeah, ooh, Natalie Portman. Or, ooh, Jim Gianopulos. In this thing the hoo-ha people are like, ooh, look, Steven Pinker, and Fareed Zakaria, and the ambassador from a country to another country. It’s very fancy.

So I went there and Fareed Zakaria interviewed me on stage about Chernobyl. And then I was heading to the airport to come home and the man who runs this whole thing said, “Oh, by the way, the President of Ukraine would like to meet you if you could delay a little bit.” And I said, yeah, I want to meet the President of Ukraine. And so I went to the President of Ukraine’s office, in this very large building that used to be the Party Headquarters back in the Soviet Days. This beautiful building.

I’d never met a president before. I’ve never gotten to say, “Well hello Mr. President.” It was very cool. And here’s the cool thing about President Zelensky. He’s just been elected. And he’s one of us, John. He’s a writer-performer-comedian-entertainer. He comes out of the entertainment business in Ukraine. And it was a great conversation. We talked a lot about film production and how to help bring film production to Ukraine. They really want to get more shows shooting there, which I thought was great. And in no way did I involve myself in any kind of weird whistleblowing scandal.

**John:** Did you make any promises to him that were listened in by intelligence officers? None of that stuff happened?

**Craig:** No. In fact, quite the opposite. At one point during the conversation we were talking about some ideas and things and he said, “You know, just to be clear we’re just talking.” I said, oh no, we’re not making the laws or anything. [laughs] I’m an idiot. You know that, right? I’m stupid.

He was great. He’s a terrific guy. At least that was my impression of him. I can’t necessarily speak to how he – I hope for the sake of Ukraine and the Ukrainian people that he does a great job. He’s got an excellent – currently he’s at like 80% popularity. Do you remember when our president got an 80% popularity?

**John:** That was a different universe.

**Craig:** Yup.

**John:** I do fear that the transcripts as people look back on this episode, you know, five years down the road something could go terribly wrong. But for this moment it was neat that you got to meet the President of Ukraine.

**Craig:** So you’re saying like there will be some crazy war or genocide and then we’ll have the equivalent of me on tape going, “Yeah, so Hitler, he seemed like a great guy. We had a great conversation.” No.

**John:** He’s really a film person. He’s an entertainer.

**Craig:** He’s an artist. He loves to paint. You know, he’s adorable. He’s cute. He’s got a great mustache. No, I’m very hopeful for Ukraine that President Zelensky does a great job. I don’t know anything about politics. At least Ukrainian politics. I know nothing. I’m mostly just optimistic and hopeful for them. But, yeah, that was weird.

**John:** Yeah. It’s also – stepping away from the President of Ukraine, it’s cool you got to travel in the circles of big thinkers who write big books about the future of the world.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** So that’s nice.

**Craig:** I felt highly unqualified. There were some really impressive, very famous historians and thinkers and politicians and people. So, but it did remind me that we actually do have quite an impact on the world around us. It’s like this podcast. You know how we’re always surprised – or maybe you’re not, but I’m always surprised when people say they listen to the podcast, like Chris O’Dowd. I was so surprised that he listens to the podcast. I’m endlessly surprised that anyone listens to it. But they do. And similarly with television you make a show and you put it out there but they might tell you, oh, this many millions of people watched it, but the number doesn’t connect in your mind to reality. And then you realize, oh yeah, these people all watched it and they have feelings about it, you know. And happily for us the overwhelming opinion of folks there in Kiev was very positive towards our show which was huge, wonderful.

**John:** The show where it’s set. So, yes, good to hear.

**Craig:** Yes, very good.

**John:** So the Emmy season is over but also another important season is over. The WGA election season, which was endless.

**Craig:** Aw. Too soon. [laughs]

**John:** Too soon. Oh god, not a moment too soon. I don’t know why, it’s probably there’s a constitutional reason why the voting period has to be so long, but Craig it was too long. It went on forever.

**Craig:** The reason is that the constitution that governs these things was written in the ‘40s I believe, you know, back when people had to vote by mail only and all the information you got came by mail.

**John:** True.

**Craig:** Or meetings that you had to go to. There was no Internet. There was no social media. So what’s happened is let’s say there was X amount of political content to which you would be exposed as a writer. Now there is 1,000 X political content that you are being exposed to as a writer in this election. It’s too long. They should shorten it because the amount of information that we’re bombarded with is insane. And it’s just too much.

**John:** It is too much. But let’s talk about the end result of this before we get into process and–

**Craig:** It was great.

**John:** [laughs] So in the East Beau Willimon was reelected along with some other folks who are supportive of the agency campaign. In the West a total of 5,809 valid ballots were cast which was 58% of eligible votes, which is a nice round number. It’s about 10,000 voters, people who could vote. So that was record turnout in the West. And more than doubles the turnout of the 2018 Board of Directors election. So David Goodman and the incumbents were reelected along with the four newcomers who I endorsed by a lot. So Goodman won 3-to-1. Everybody else was at least 2-to-1. So it was a significant victory for that group of people who are sort of a steady line from where we’ve been.

**Craig:** Yeah. No question. And I think this was essentially a foregone conclusion almost from the start. I mean, I didn’t think it would be otherwise. There’s some interesting things that come out of this. By the way, and one of them is that also just to be clear in case people were wondering, if I had been able to stay in the race I also would have lost. There’s no question. It’s interesting, the most important thing I hope that our membership takes away from this, particularly the people that did vote for the people who won, is that the election was not damaging to our union. That this kind of open discussion and debate did not destroy us. Nor did it topple their preferred candidates to the ground.

There was almost, I want to call it like a paranoia, or a fear that something that they loved very much or cared about very deeply was going to be destroyed by people from within. And that did not happen. Point being you can survive elections, and I’m saying this especially to guild members who never really saw one of these before because unfortunately and anomalously the last three presidential elections have essentially been uncontested, which is not the traditional WGA way. This is the traditional WGA election.

So, good news is we can survive these. They’re very good for us. They’re good to discuss. And the other thing that’s important to note for people like me who are questioning the way the leadership is going about pursuing a conclusion, a potential conclusion, to our agency campaign is that the amount of people that seemed to dissent from the way the leadership is doing this has roughly quadrupled since we took our first vote on it back in whatever it was, March or April. Back then it was 95%, about 400 people said no to that. I was not one of them. I was like you, I said yes.

About ish, averaging around 1,600 people voted against leadership, so something is happening. It’s worth noting. Those people are not in power. The people who are in power are in power. But there is a trend. So I’m hoping that leadership has taken notice of that and will consider it as they now go about, I don’t know, doing what they’re going to do.

**John:** I would say at all of the membership meetings, and I don’t know if you’ve listened to any of the audio from the membership meetings, the current leadership was very up front about the fact recognizing that five months into this dissent has grown. There’s folks who are unhappy with how all of this is being conducted. And sort of worried about the outcome of things. And so I think that was reflected in some of that voting there. But I think a probably more crucial takeaway is that there was this worry I think that in the fatigue and in this thing going on that people would just start tuning out. They would start paying attention and just kind of want to be done or just shut it all out.

And I think the fact that there was record turnout, that Goodman was elected by a huge majority than even he was elected when he was uncontested speaks to a support for a resolution with the current people in place.

**Craig:** You mean he got more votes this time.

**John:** Yes.

**Craig:** I mean, he can’t do better than 100%

**John:** It is hard to do that math. At least in a democratic system, yes.

**Craig:** Correct. The turnout was very encouraging. You want to see writers engaged. And this is my point to everybody that was kind of freaking out. I’m sorry. They kind of were. I was shocked. The worst possible instinct we could have as a union and as a membership polity is to be against free and open elections and campaigns. And I love to see that people were engaged and got engaged and voted. I think this is exactly the way it should go. I’m thrilled. And I hope that the people take some sort of – now that they’ve gone through it maybe they’ll feel a little less insecure about it the next time through.

**John:** The one thing I do want to bring up because this is a thing I’ve seen and grousing on the edges of the Internet is like, “Oh, those folks who voted for it aren’t even really working writers.” And that is not accurate. I mean, in order to be a voting member people should know it’s not that you sell a script and then 20 years later you’re still a voting member. You’re not. You have to sort of keep working in order to maintain your current status. And so for 2018 there were 6,057 who reported earnings. So there are a lot of working writers who are the voting membership of the WGA.

**Craig:** Yeah, you hear this a lot. I mean, yes, technically you can have people – well, there are two kinds of writers who can vote who are not working writers. Your initial membership period is seven years. So, when you become a WGA member you have seven years to vote before you’re going to have to show some additional employment. So, yeah, some people theoretically are on year six of their seven without working. And there’s also quite a few people that are what we call lifetime current members. So you and I would certainly qualify. Once you have – I think it’s 15 years.

**John:** 15 years, yes.

**Craig:** Yeah, of being current active you become lifetime. 15 years is actually not that much. So there are a lot of people who are current lifetime members which means they’re going to vote forever until they die. And, yeah, so sure. But the truth is, OK, we don’t know how they vote. I mean, it’s tempting for some people to say, “Well, some people, they’re not working so it’s easy for them to vote for a strike or to vote to fire your agents.” I guess, but I think a lot of people who aren’t working also feel like, no, it’s important that the guild to not go on strike or not fire their agents. There’s no science to that is my point.

**John:** I would agree.

**Craig:** But I will say if I could, if I could wave a magic wand, I would, I don’t know about this lifetime – I don’t know if people should be voting forever. I actually worry about that. Because we’re getting older longer. Right? And there is a world in which you have more people voting in a union who are lifetime current members than current active members, which would be a disaster. That’s not what you want. So I wonder about that sometimes.

**John:** Yeah. And so this is not a thing that I’ve been spending time thinking about, so I’m just going to wonder aloud. Perhaps a reason why lifetime current members should be able to vote is that the actions of the guild now still have a bearing on their income and sort of their ability to do things. So, the degree to which leadership of the WGA can set broad policies that would affect – I mean, pension is a separate thing. So I’m trying to think the degree to which elected leadership would have a bearing on a person who is essentially no longer employed is interesting. I don’t know.

**Craig:** You’re right. It’s a tricky one. Because most unions do not have this. I mean, most unions it’s like if you’re not working, you’re not working you’re not voting. I’m pretty sure. I don’t think this is a common thing where you get to vote for the rest of your life even though you haven’t worked in 30 years which is the case for some people.

I don’t think when you and I first started in the union I don’t think it was as big of a deal because, well A, people didn’t live quite as long as they do now. And there were fewer people that had been employed up to that point. And also the guild was a little bit more homogenous in its thinking. But as things polarize a little bit, which seems to be the trend everywhere in the world. Thank you social media. And as people live longer I can see a potential issue on the horizon. And I say that as somebody who would be a beneficially of being a lifetime current member. That maybe, you know, maybe after – cap it. Like if you haven’t worked in 10 years maybe no more. Maybe you should stop voting.

It’s a thought. I can see the gray army – the art militia is marching to my house. But, hey, guys, I’m old too.

**John:** This feels like one of those questions where if this was debate team you could argue either side and have really good arguments to list either side. So maybe that’s why it’s an interesting debate question.

The one thing that probably every member can agree on is that there were a lot of emails and sometimes those emails that came from the WGA [unintelligible] which basically candidates and sometimes even non-members can spend some money and send out an email blast to all WGA members. People got frustrated by that. I would say it’s part of the democratic process. I don’t want to limit that. I think structurally I don’t think anything should change. I just recognize that as it got later into the voting season people got more and more annoyed by those. And I think it did not help the people who were sending those emails late in the process.

**Craig:** Well, everybody was sending them so if it didn’t help people it didn’t help people equally. But I agree with you. It’s part of the process. Communicating to the membership is important. What I think would help us is what you suggested right off the top, just shortening the season.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** So, it’s one thing to get bombarded with emails for a month. It’s another thing to get bombarded with emails for three months, or whatever it was. Right? July, August, September. Ish. 2.5 months. So, I saw people complaining about it and I just found it absurd. Like, aw, you poor baby, you had to see an email? Aw, you had to press delete? Aw. You were born in 2002. Yeah, that’s right. I just took a shot at millennials like every other old, cranky dick. I don’t care.

**John:** Craig, do you know who is not going to fix this problem?

**Craig:** Who?

**John:** Me. I’m not on the board anymore.

**Craig:** By the way, we’re both free, right?

**John:** We’re both free.

**Craig:** We’re both free because you’re free-free, and now I can be even more of a jerk than I already was because I don’t have to worry about including you in people I’m yelling at.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Because I love you.

**John:** Aw, Craig, I love you, too.

**Craig:** I don’t give a shit about the rest of these people, so gloves are off.

**John:** All right. Let’s move on to our next topic. So this past week Jodi Kantor and Megan Twohey, the reporters who originally broke the Harvey Weinstein story for the New York Times back in 2017 released their book She Said. Revealed new information about the secret settlements and non-disclosure agreements that allowed Weinstein and other powerful men to get away with what they were doing.

A lot of the tension this past week was focused on the celebrity feminist mother-daughter team of Gloria Allred and Lisa Bloom. And this was an area of the story that I wasn’t really aware of. And reading it and listening to it I was struck by a couple things. First off, it’s always good to check in and see sort of where we’re at in this post-Weinstein era in terms of how we’re dealing with just terrible men doing terrible things.

But this new wrinkle in it very much felt like a How Would This Be a Movie kind of twist to it because it was such a fascinating lens to be looking at this story through of these women who were known as crusaders for victims’ rights for women who were – in the case of Bloom working for the other side. There’s a letter we can link to which is especially damning in terms of outlining the strategy for how she would protect Weinstein.

**Craig:** I haven’t had a chance to read this but it does strike me that in all likelihood this is our generation’s All the President’s Men. I mean, it feels like this is a great story of two heretofore unknown journalists blowing open a story that changes our culture permanently. And so we have heroes.

**John:** And I would add Ronan Farrow into that, too, in the sense that there’s a whole collection of folks who are trying to do things and other journalists along the way who were frustrated that they weren’t able to get anyone to go on record.

**Craig:** Exactly. And so you have your protagonists in that sense. And there is an achievement at the end that is undeniable. And I think it’s, well, it’s just great to see stories again where people achieve and change the world with their minds and not with their jet-packs and super-serums and laser eyes. Because that’s real. And I’m thrilled that it happened.

I, like you, was not prepared for the arrival of new villains. Right? So you think the villain is Harvey and Les Moonves, et cetera, et cetera. And then you get this letter from Lisa Bloom that is just jaw-dropping.

**John:** So Megana our producer was asking at lunch, you know, to what degree was all of this an open secret. Because I see that term in quotes “open secret” in a lot of the coverage about this. Like, “Oh, Harvey Weinstein’s behavior was an ‘open secret.’” And I was having a hard time answering her because it depends on sort of what you mean what was the secret. I would say that through my Hollywood career I knew that he was an asshole. I knew that he was abusive. And I think I had a sense that there was a casting couch but I’m putting that in air quotes here because how did I think that this was a benign consensual casting couch. As we’re looking for villains, as I’m looking at myself as a villain, I think to have so misframed that in my head is one of the things I’m going to be sort of reckoning with and I think a lot of folks will be reckoning with as we take a look at these powerful men being brought down.

**Craig:** Yeah. I mean, I’m currently writing a book about you as the villain. [laughs] You’re at the center of all of this.

**John:** Yes.

**Craig:** Well, listen, and I can answer Megana’s question as best I can from my perspective, because I worked for the Weinsteins for a number of years. Almost exclusively for Bob which I can assure you was not a delight by any stretch of the imagination. But I had my run-ins with Harvey. I had no idea, none, zero that there was any kind of non-consensual sexual activity going on. The rumors that I heard were that certain female actors had engaged in a quid pro quo with Harvey, where consensually there was an agreement. I will sleep with you and you will put me in this movie. Which is gross. It’s not illegal. It’s unethical. It’s gross. It is a kind of abuse. There’s no question of that. It’s an abuse of power. Not to mention – also forgotten that he’s married to another woman. There’s a billion rules he’s broken but not a law.

So, it seemed scummy but it didn’t seem like a criminal thing that made you want to hurl. That was what I thought the open secret was, and even then I kind of didn’t really believe it. I’ve got to be honest with you. I thought it felt like a rumor mill thing that seemed a bit misogynistic. Like, oh, so and so couldn’t have been an actor unless she slept with Harvey. And the names that were being thrown around I thought, um, no, I think they would have been just fine. They’re good at their jobs. And they’re beautiful. And they check a lot of boxes for what a star should look like in the year say 2003.

So, that’s about as much as I knew. I would imagine other people, well certainly people inside. We know now from this book for instance, from the Kantor and Twohey book that certainly Bob knew. He claims to not know. But he knew.

**John:** Yeah. I think it’s always worth asking what’s happening right now that is analogous that we’re not paying attention to. Like what are the things that five years, ten years down the road we’ll be asking, hey, was that an open secret? How were you letting this go on? I think it’s always worth doing the introspection to look around and see what is happening in the industry right now that will seem shocking down the road.

And I don’t have an answer for that but I think it’s always good to be asking that question.

**Craig:** Oh, yeah. That is a good one.

**John:** That can be a thinker. I don’t know that we’ll have an answer today.

**Craig:** I’ve got to be honest with you. I’m the last person who will come up with the answer to that. I’ve always felt quite sheltered. I don’t know, like self-sheltered from – like I’ve never been to a Hollywood party in 25 years where I’ve seen people doing drugs. Do you know how hard that must be to do? [laughs] You know?

**John:** I’ve never seen anyone do cocaine. I’ve never done cocaine. I’ve never seen anyone do cocaine. And yet I see it in movies all the time.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** So people are doing it. But I’ve never seen it.

**Craig:** Have you ever seen cocaine?

**John:** I’ve never seen cocaine.

**Craig:** I’ve never seen cocaine either. This is why you and I are perfect for each other. We’re the only two people I think in Hollywood and possibly in the world that have never seen cocaine. I’m not sure it’s even real. [laughs] It may be a thing that they’ve just invented for movies. It’s fake. I’ve never even seen it. So, we’re not – you and I will be the last people to know is my point.

**John:** Yeah. We’re just off playing D&D while everyone else is doing drugs.

**Craig:** Doing the drugs.

**John:** All of the drugs.

**Craig:** All the drugs.

**John:** So that might be an invitation to listeners. If you think that there is a thing that we’re not paying attention to that could be thing ten years from now. Like how the hell were you not paying attention to that? Write in. Tell us that. Because I’ll be curious what you guys think.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** I also need your opinion some bit of housekeeping here. So Scriptnotes has always been and will always be free every week. It has no ads so we don’t make money in sort of the traditional podcast ways.

**Craig:** I don’t make money.

**John:** I know. But we do have expenses. So, mostly salaries. We pay for Megana, our producer. Matthew Chilelli who is our editor. And John who does our transcripts. We also pay for the servers. So there are some costs. To allay those costs we have the premium feed, so that is all the back episodes of Scriptnotes and the transcripts, the Scriptnotes app. More than 3,000 of you out there are premium feed members so thank you very much for doing that. That’s $2 a month.

But there’s some issues. And so right now we’re doing our premium stuff through Libsyn and they’re the hosting company. And they do a good job sort of getting stuff out there, but the app is not great. We’ve had some problems with the app. And Megana has being a lot of work with the Libsyn folks to try to get the app fixed up. We don’t actually make the app. We just brand it.

And if you go on their website it looks like it’s from 1999. And that shouldn’t be a big thing but I don’t have great faith in parts of it. So as I look at other podcasts out there, a lot of them are on Patreon. We’re considering moving over to Patreon. But I would love to hear folks’ opinions on should we make a switch over there. Are they happy enough with sort of what we have?

If we move over to Patreon the Scriptnotes app would eventually stop working. Is that a big deal? So I need listeners to tell us what you think about moving over to a different place.

**Craig:** You know, I think we should. I’m a listener. I’m actually not a listener as you know. I’m just a talker. But I love change. Before you laugh at me, I do like technological change. I do like every now and then taking a look at what you’ve gotten used to technologically and then saying let me do a little bit of research and see if there’s something better out there. Because generally speaking there is.

So, I think we should change. No offense to Libsyn. I say let’s do it. Let’s go and do it.

**John:** All right. So I will say, we’ll get your feedback. If we do make the switch we’ll keep both things running for a while. So it’s not like Libsyn will suddenly get shut off and Patreon will take over. We’ll figure out some way so that if you’re currently burning through your catalog on the app the app will keep working for a while. And if we transition there will be a grace period hopefully moving between the two of them. So, just letting people know that there might be a change in the offing here.

**Craig:** I’m excited. Change is good.

**John:** Cool. All right. So this year at the Austin Film Festival you will be there, but I will not be there because I’m going to be giving a speech that I promised to give. It’s a prestigious speech back at my alma mater. And I want to talk a little bit about what my topic is because it’s a speech that I gave way back in 2006 and I’m giving an updated version of the speech. And it’s on professionalism. And it feels like a good topic for Scriptnotes overall because the original topic for the speech was professional writing in the rise of the amateur. And sort of that weird tension between what it means to be professional and what it means to be an amateur.

In my initial speech I argue that professionalism has five basic characteristics. First is presentation, AKA giving a shit. Accuracy. Consistency. Accountability. And peer standards. And what I was trying to do is distinguish between professionalism from getting paid for it, because we tend to think of pro as being like a pro athlete who gets paid and an amateur athlete who doesn’t get paid. And I was arguing that much more important is how you’re perceiving your own work and how you are – the standards you’re holding yourself to and the standards that others are holding yourself to that determines professional from unprofessional.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** Craig, are those characteristics useful metrics for you for whether someone is acting professionally?

**Craig:** They are. I think there is a – I’m going to add one. And it’s humility. And here’s why I’m adding it. Because we’re in an interesting time right now where a lot of people – in a fantastic way a bunch of fake, bad barriers to entry are being dismantled. And a lot of cruel pointless downward pressures are being eliminated. And I think a number of people are saying, “Listen, one of the things that’s really important to do is not be shy, not be self-deprecating, stand up for yourself, self-promote. Don’t be afraid to talk about what you’ve done well.” All those things are true.

But what I sometimes see is it’s being done – because it’s sometimes an unnatural thing for people to do. So what ends up happening is it’s done in a kind of calculated way and what’s missing therefore is an honest element of humility.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** And I think that professionals should – and typically do have a certain kind of humility that comes with understanding that no matter how good you do, no matter how well you do, no matter how much you’ve learned, no matter how much experience you have there’s somebody who is better than you. And that’s a wonderful thing. It means that there is room to grow.

And it keeps you I think – it keeps your feet on the ground. And it prevents what I would call healthy self-regard and self-promotion from becoming a kind of braggy, almost insecure kind of promotion. So, I think humility is really important. I try and – well, I don’t have to try. I wake up in the morning feeling terrible [laughs], so that’s easy. But I honestly as a professional when I meet another professional who I think is really good who is humble in a kind of honest way without being self-deprecating or self-damaging, it really matters. I notice it and it means a lot. And I love that.

**John:** You and I can both think of some screenwriters who are really good at their job but they are lacking any humility. And —

**Craig:** Oh god.

**John:** And they – you marginalize them because of their lack of humility. And so – and I think it’s great that you’re drawing a distinction between – you can be proud of your work, you can be proud of your presentation, you can really be focused on the hustle that gets you forward, but always having the humility to ask what if I’m wrong. Or, you know, to acknowledge that there’s others out there who are doing great work as well. I think it allows sort of a self-correcting aspect which is really crucial.

**Craig:** Correct. And I will also say that when a writer talks about something they love, let’s say I’m reading a line and there’s a writer, she’s saying, “I read this script by this person. I think it’s amazing and here’s why.” My heart just pops open. Because that to me – that’s when I go, OK, you are – I love what you’re saying and how you’re thinking. I love the fact that you’re talking about someone else. I think it’s amazing when people do that. That to me is where I really actually come to respect the person doing the praising, even more than perhaps the person they’re praising.

It’s when people start banging their own gong kind of without any sense of context or humility that I just go, OK, well you know what would be really cool? If somebody else said this about you. That would be amazing. Right? And so I love saying great things about other writers online that I love and respect and admire. I think it’s a really healthy part of being a professional. Again, I’m not saying you have to stop saying that you’ve done something good. I’m just saying maybe every – just pare it. If you’re going to sort of talk about look what I did, isn’t that awesome, hire me, pay me. These are good things, right? Also, take a look at what that person did. And hire them and pay them, too. That’s a helpful thing.

**John:** Agreed. So I’m going to put a link in the show notes to the existing speech which was back in 2006. But part of why I’m bringing it up here is that I feel like there’s a lot that needs to be updated just in terms of what’s changed in the world and also I think some of my assumptions or my – I was writing for a slightly different world but also I think my views have changed a bit.

So clearly some things have changed. As I wrote this initial essay I was talking about websites. And now of course websites are social media. And so, you know, writing a blog post is a bigger effort than sending off a tweet. And so I think a lot more people are public-facing enterprises in ways that they weren’t back in the day. And so what does professionalism mean in a tweet is a different thing. It’s not just about – it’s not the grammar but it’s looking at how are you engaging with the wider world. Are you being fair to the people that you are calling out? Call out culture in general. The cycle of outrage is something that is very different.

And I see writers piling on in ways that are just not helpful or good or professionalism. And certainly doesn’t show any of those five or now six characteristics that we’re looking for in a professional.

I look at #MeToo and the degree to which I think sometimes professionalism can be used as synonymous with keeping your mouth shut. And that wasn’t good.

**Craig:** Mm-hmm. No.

**John:** That didn’t work out. I look at Donald Trump and breaking all norms and having no shame. Having no humility whatsoever.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** And so I think we have to acknowledge that it’s tougher to argue that the only way to be successful is to be professional when you have the most unprofessional person I can imagine running the country.

**Craig:** Is he? [laughs] Is he running anything?

**John:** I don’t know.

**Craig:** Don’t you just think that they just give that baby a rattle in the morning and then tuck him in at night with a hamburger.

**John:** Yeah. I mean, somehow he got there.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** We can parse all the things that happened but it makes it tough to aspire to the highest standards when you see that the person who got the highest office has none of those standards.

**Craig:** Yeah. This is when it’s the hardest – it’s easy to be a professional when it’s not hard to be a professional. And it’s hard to be a professional when it’s hard to be a professional. And when you’re surrounded by amateurs and when it is amateur hour and when you are tempted to stand up and say, “Does anyone in this room understand how stupid you all are and how under-qualified you all are and how over-authorized you all are?” Those are the moments where it’s really hard to maintain your professionalism. And yet generally speaking when you blow it you blow it. You know?

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** You just have to kind of be patient. It’s the worst. And it’s not fair and it’s particularly not fair to people who have historically been excluded to finally arrive and then be told, “Oh, and also now you have to be patient again because for this, and this, and this.” And I understand why people don’t want to be patient. And in some circumstances they shouldn’t. You know, I know I’m old school. I know that. But by and large being professional in the long run will accrue to your benefit. I believe that as an article of faith.

**John:** Yes. I would say that part of being professional is sort of peer standards and I think we have to acknowledge that for a very long time those peer standards were set by, you know, straight white men.

**Craig:** Yes. Yes.

**John:** And so what was professional was their expectation. And so they could use unprofessional as a cudgel against anybody who didn’t match those things. And so we always have to be questioning and challenging what those things are. And so code switching as an example of using different speech with different people that’s a natural thing. And so that we don’t recognize that people who are working for us are going to do that is ridiculous. And we have to sort of broaden our expectations of what is appropriate in different places. And that people’s backgrounds are going to influence how they are presenting themselves and that’s natural.

And that you sort of want people working for you that reflect a wide range of experience because that’s the only way you’re going to be getting all the information that you should be getting in.

**Craig:** Yeah. And to be clear, being professional doesn’t mean that suddenly solomonically you know exactly what the answer to every conflict is. We are now in a space where we are running into conflicts that we weren’t expecting or hadn’t previously defined and we’re not quite sure what to do about them at times. I’m speaking about people that are in authority and have the ability to make decisions or set policy. We’re all learning to some extent together. And negotiating together. And, of course – and this is the big secret – people are individuals. So we can come up with policies and conventional wisdoms but for certain individuals they just don’t agree. I mean, it’s hard, right? You can’t just say, “Well, in general the way we should treat this group of people is blankety-blank.”

90% of those people will say, “Yes, thank you.” And 10% will say, “I hate that.” So now what do you do if some of those 10% are in your room working for you? It’s really – I think we have to give each other a little bit of a break while we figure this out.

**John:** Yeah. And on the topic of figuring stuff out, like a thing that came up recently was Walter Mosley, a great writer, who left the writers’ room of Star Trek Discovery because he used the N-word. Walter Mosley is black. And so is it fair for Walter Mosley to use that word in the room? Is it appropriate for Walter Mosley to use that word in the room? I don’t know. I don’t have an answer for you. But that was an issue. And so that’s a thing we have to figure out.

I see staff writers on Twitter who are asked to promote their show or to live tweet show but are also called out for having their own opinions at times. And that’s a thing we have to figure out. We have influencers whose whole – who make their living–

**Craig:** Blech.

**John:** –seeming like they’re just normal people or whatever, but it’s their authenticity that is selling a brand, but they are the brand. That’s a weird thing. It makes me really uncomfortable.

**Craig:** Yeah. Why don’t we just replace the word influencer with sociopaths? Isn’t that what that is? [laughs]

**John:** I know two influencers who are genuinely great people. But is challenging to know sort of like, OK, are you actually having fun or are you having fun for a brand? And that’s, yes.

**Craig:** You know, the Walter Mosley thing is fascinating. The only details I know were from the story I read, but it seems like there was an African-American writer on staff who complained to HR and then Walter Mosley – I don’t know if he was just immediately terminated. I think they kind of had a discussion with him. And from what I sussed out he said, “Yeah, no, I’m not going to apologize for that.” And then they said, OK, well you’ve got to go.

Whenever I see these things, these stories of this sort I think please remember, Craig, that you weren’t there and you don’t know everything.

**John:** Yep.

**Craig:** I don’t know – do you know how many times you think you understand something and then somebody comes up to you and says, “Oh, let me just tell you what actually happened and the way it happened.” And you go, “Ooohhh.”

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** So there are times where I think like, what, they did what? And then you find out everything and you go, oh yeah, I totally get it now. We just don’t know. But oh my god, does that not stop us from yapping our judgments out there into the world. Like we are Galactus ready to eat the planet for the crime of whatever outrage we’re currently simmering over. We just don’t know. And by the way, you and I – one thing we both are sure of is that in general the entertainment journalism industry not great at reporting full facts, context, et cetera.

**John:** Yep. Context is tough. And I would say but at least entertainment press might have a thousand words to dedicate to something. A tweet doesn’t. So a tweet has almost no context. You’re sort of creating context around the outrage storm that’s there. And that ain’t healthy.

**Craig:** No.

**John:** But another thing which is worth noticing is that sometimes what’s professional can feel artificial. It can feel not real or authentic because like, oh, you’re trying too hard. And that’s a weird thing that we’re at now, too. Where just like using full sentences, you know, proper punctuation, things are changing but there’s still an expectation of sort of how things are supposed to be working.

So, just recognizing that I think the core characteristics of professionalism are probably enduring. And I’m going to probably add humility as one of those. But figuring out how those apply to a quickly changing world is the challenge we’re always going to be wrestling with. Which is why I can give this speech in October and then a few years later I’m going to have to update it again because things will have changed.

**Craig:** I think that’s the most important thing. And that is what’s going to keep you from being cranky old man. I mean, look, I was born a cranky old man. But what I’m trying to avoid is a cranky old man set in his ways. As long you are keeping tabs on the way the world changes and you’re listening to people from a wide range of ages and races and orientations and beliefs then you should be able to adapt as the world changes. You will not be young ever again. You will not be current in the way that a 25-year-old is current. Not possible. Nor should it be.

But what you can avoid is being ignorant, stuck in your ways, blinkered, whatever word you want to come up with for somebody that’s just decided I’m checking out. Like, look, I know somewhere along the line I just said I can’t keep up with new music anymore. It’s over. Right? It’s over. That’s fine. No problem. I’m OK to let that go and just live with the 70 years of music that that I know and I feel good about. Fine.

But when it comes to the way our society functions and in particular the way our business functions and the way professional writers function it’s incumbent upon me to listen – and again be humble – and not immediately go, “Wah, these kids,” even though I did take a shot at millennials earlier, because sometimes they are dicks.

**John:** All right. Let’s answer some listener questions. We have two questions here about credits. Craig, you know a ton about credits so maybe we’ll ask you these questions. Tim writes, “On When They See Us I notice that Ava DuVernay has a strange story credit. Can you shed some light on to why she’s on there twice?” And the credit he’s linking to is “Story by Ava DuVernay and Ana DuVernay & Julian Breece.” Craig tell us.

**Craig:** Sure. It does look weird. And here’s how that functions. When you write as a team with somebody you are considered a unique writer for the purposes of credit determination. So Ava DuVernay & Julian Breece. They wrote together as a team. That is considered a writer. Ava DuVernay also clearly worked on this on her own. That’s a different writer. So Ava DuVernay on her own is considered a discrete writer from Ava DuVernay and Julian Breece.

Now, you go into an arbitration if there is – in this case I don’t know if there was an arbitration.

**John:** I suspect it would have to be because she was a producer on the show. She was a production executive on the show.

**Craig:** Yeah, so there was an automatic arbitration. And so what happens is they look at all the material. They don’t see names. What they see is Writer A and Writer B and Writer C and Writer D. In this case let’s just say there was Writer A and Writer B. Writer A was Ava DuVernay. Writer B was Ava DuVernay and Julian Breece. The arbiters look at it and they go, “You know what? Story seems to be Writer A. Deserves Story credit. And so does Writer B. That’s what it is.”

Now, I believe – I could be wrong – I’m pretty sure that as a writer you have the option in this circumstance to collapse the credit down. So you don’t have to have your name twice. In this case, I don’t know if she chose to have her name twice or if she wasn’t aware that was an option. Or, third possibility, I’m just wrong about this. But I don’t thing I am. I think you can collapse your name down and it just would say Ava DuVernay & Julian Breece.

But, the Writers Guild would understand that you actually do have more of a percentage of that credit for the purposes of distributing residuals. Because residuals are based on the credits. So in this case – like in features Story is worth 25% of residuals. So if you are Story by Ava DuVernay and Ava DuVernay & Julian Breece, half of that 25% would go to Ava and half of the other half of 25% would go to Ava, and then the rest would go to Julian Breece.

So you can collapse your credits down to avoid this weird syndrome of double naming. But you would not lose your fair percentage of residuals as a result.

**John:** Yes. So the crucial take away from that is this was probably a result of arbitration and the folks who were assigning those credits they didn’t see names. They just saw Writer A and Writer B. And you wouldn’t think twice about it if it was just Writer A and Writer B. It’s just a weird situation where Writer B is a team that also includes Writer A.

**Craig:** Yeah. I believe – and I believe this collapsing down thing is possible because I think I’ve done it.

**John:** OK. Cool. Nick from Sydney, Australia, who lives in LA, asks, “Can a Created by TV credit be taken away in the same way that a writing credit can in cases where subsequent writers make substantial changes to a screenplay? For example, if I secure a Created by credit on my contract for work on a pilot script and series bible, but then another showrunner takes over the project and makes substantial changes. Can I have the credit taken away? Is there arbitration for such an action?”

Craig, talk us through Created by.

**Craig:** OK, I have an answer. I looked it up. So, a Created by credit comes from an original series and there are two ways you can get – you become eligible for a Created credit. You write a format for the series. I think in that sense what it means is an outline or bible. Or, and/or, you receive Story by or Written by credit on the pilot episode of the series.

Generally if no format has been written, so that would be the equivalent of a treatment in features, then the Created by credit will go to the writers who receive the Story by or Written by credit on the pilot. And that’s how that works. So it is a function of the WGA making a determination. You can’t be guaranteed it. There must be a final determination of credits on the pilot episode of the series.

So, what I would say to Nick from Sydney, Australia is if you wrote the pilot script and the series bible, the series bible in and of itself should guarantee you a Created by credit. Somebody else could add on if they receive a Story by or Written by credit on the pilot, then they too would be eligible for a Created by credit.

**John:** All right. It’s time for our One Cool Things. This is the fall. So it means that I have to have one of my One Cool Things be the Flu Shot.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** A good friend of ours was felled by the flu this past week. So, guys, get the flu shot. It’s basically like the cheapest insurance you can get for like not being sick for a week to ten days. Just get your Flu Shot.

**Craig:** Get it.

**John:** It’s good. It’s helpful.

**Craig:** Get it.

**John:** I can also recommend that if you are using Highland2, the pro upgrade on Highland2, there’s a new item underneath the help menu for the Highland2 Slack Channel. So if you’re a Pro member you can join on Slack where we are discussing features that are coming to Highland and you get an early look at things. So if you are a person who uses Slack or a person who might want to use Slack we have a channel now for those pro users. And you should come join us there and we can talk about the future of Highland because there’s some really cool things coming down the pike.

**Craig:** Fantastic. It is fall. And so I feel like if they could only come up with a pumpkin spice Flu Shot.

**John:** Oh. That would do it. Sell a thousand of them.

**Craig:** Right? [Crosstalk]

**John:** I have last request of listeners. One of the things we’re working on in Highland is support for scripts that are written right to left, so Arabic and Hebrew and some other languages. What we’re really lacking is examples of scripts written in those languages. And so I’ve seen scripts written in most of the Roman languages, like European languages. I’ve not seen scripts in a lot of other languages. And so I know some people use Word or other places. But if you are a listener who is working in screenplays in languages other than English and you feel like sending us a copy, just a PDF so we can take a look at what it looks like, that would be great. So just send it through to ask@johnaugust.com.

We just would love a bigger corpus of scripts from outside the US and Europe to take a look at sort of how we can do a better job working with those languages.

**Craig:** I’ve weighted my whole life to just look at you pouring over a Hebrew text.

**John:** Absolutely. What’s the name of the stick you use as you read the Torah?

**Craig:** You know, that’s a great question. I don’t know. Well, the deal with the stick, traditionally it’s a silver rod with a hand. It’s a little bit like the hand from the hand of the queen or the hand of the king in Game of Thrones. So it’s a pointer in the shape of a hand and finger. And the purpose of that is you’re not supposed to touch the Torah because you’re desecrating it with your stupid human finger or something. Because it’s so important.

God, I’m such an atheist. But, yeah, I used that thing. I used the stick when I was a young bar mitzvah boy.

**John:** Craig, I’ve never asked. What was your bar mitzvah passage? Like what were you assigned?

**Craig:** Do not remember. But I will tell you that it was from Jeremiah. I remember it was from Jeremiah. Not one of your more popular chapters of the Old Testament. But here’s the weird part. This is actually kind of bizarre. So the Jewish calendar is not like the January to December calendar that we use. It is a lunar calendar. This is why for instance Easter is constantly shuffling around. Because Easter is based on Passover. And Passover moves around per the Jewish calendar.

So, when you are a bar mitzvah boy or a bat mitzvah girl you get assigned what’s called a Haftarah which is your portion of the Torah that you’re supposed to read, AKA memorize blindly because you don’t speak the language. And the Torah is read from beginning to end throughout the Jewish year. And there’s a holiday called Simchat Torah which is, yay, we get to start over again and read it again. So, over the course of the year every Saturday or Friday and Saturday there is a chunk that you read to progress your way through. Meaning your birthday will roughly coincide with a general section, depending on what year it is.

Here’s the weird part. My birthday is in April, early April. My father’s birthday is in early June. That’s two months apart. My father’s parents were so proud of him, because they were so Jewish, that in 19 – he was 13 in 1955. They took him to a small recording studio in Manhattan and made him do his Haftarah thing into a microphone which was pressed onto a vinyl 78 RPM disc.

**John:** That’s amazing.

**Craig:** And he had it. And he took it out while I was studying my thing. And he took it out to play it and I said, oh my god, it’s the same one. We had the same one. Isn’t that weird?

**John:** That is great and weird.

**Craig:** It’s great and weird.

**John:** Yeah, so I mean mathematically not impossible, but still great when those things happen.

**Craig:** It was highly unlikely but, yeah, so we both had the same torture, reciting the same who cares paragraph at length. That’s this week’s Jew Corner with Craig Jew Mazin. My One Cool Thing this week is Seven Cool Things if I may. Not this past Sunday when we won/almost won/sort of won/lost everything at the Emmys, the Sunday prior was the Creative Arts Emmys where a whole bunch of our Chernobyl professionals were nominated for Emmys. And seven of them won.

And I am so proud of them. And so I just wanted to say their names and what they won because it was a joy. I was just – can I just be Jewish again for a second. I was kvelling. I was kvelling. I really was. I’m so proud of them. So I’m just going to say who they were because they did such a good job. So, Stuart Hilliker and Vincent Piponnier, our rerecording and production mixers won for Outstanding Sound Mixing for a Limited Series or Movie. And this was a great one. Outstanding Production Design for a Narrative, Period, or Fantasy program one hour or more, we won, Luke Hull, production designer, Karen Wayfield, art director, and Claire Levinson, set director. And on that one we even beat Game of Thrones.

**John:** How nice is that?

**Craig:** I mean, it was pretty good. I was sitting right behind Dan and Dave, so on that one we were kind of giving each other [unintelligible], but you know what? It was good. They won like 10 Emmys that night. So congrats to them.

We also won for Outstanding Special Visual Effects in a supporting role. And that was – there’s a whole bunch of guys and women, but Max Denison and Lindsay McFarland were our leads on that one.

We won for Outstanding Single Camera Picture Editing for a Limited Series or Movie. That was won by one of our editors, Simon Smith. So fantastic for him.

This was a great one. We also won Outstanding Music Composition for a Limited Series, Movie, or Special. That was Hildur Guonadottir who was our amazing composer. And by the way won an Emmy for Chernobyl. She – I’m predicting – is going to be nominated for an Oscar for Joker. So she’s having one hell of a year. I mean, oh god, I love her so much. So I’m so happy to see that.

And we also won Outstanding Sound Editing for a Limited Series, Movie, or Special. That was Stefan, Joe, Michael, Harry, Andy, and Anna.

And we won Outstanding Cinematography for a Limited Series or Movie and that was Jakob Ihre, the amazing Jakob Ihre, who was our director DP.

So congratulations to all of our winners and also we had I think six other nominees and so we are just so proud of all of them. I couldn’t be happier with that result. It was a fantastic night. And the best part was I didn’t even have to worry. I didn’t have to be nervous. I didn’t have to think of a speech or any of that nonsense. So, that was the best part of this whole thing.

**John:** Absolutely. Congratulations again to all of them and to you, Craig, or–

**Craig:** Or not. [laughs]

**John:** Or not. [laughs] Congratulations on the show regardless. And that’s our episode for this week. Scriptnotes is produced by Megana Rao. It was edited by Matthew Chilelli. Our outro this week is by John Spurney. If you have an outro, and we’re kind of running low on outros here folks, please send us a link to ask@johnaugust.com. That’s also the place where you can send longer questions like the ones we answered today. But on Twitter, of course, Craig is @clmazin. I’m @johnaugust.

If you have thoughts about professionalism, if you have thoughts about the switch from Libsyn over to Patreon or some other stuff like that hit us up. Tell us on Twitter or send us an email. Because we want to know what you think.

You can find the show notes for this episode and all episodes at johnaugust.com. That’s also where you’ll find the transcripts. You’ll find all the back episodes at Scriptnotes.net. You need to sign up there in order to use the Scriptnotes app for iOS or Android, neither of which is quite up to snuff and I’m sorry about that.

You can also download 50-episode seasons at store.johnaugust.com

Craig, thanks and congratulations. Next week is going to be a big show for a secret reason that people don’t know yet.

**Craig:** Ooh, I’m so excited. I don’t think I know it either.

**John:** You know who the guest is.

**Craig:** Oh, I do. Yeah, it’s pretty great. [laughs]

**John:** Cool.

**Craig:** Have a nice week. Bye.

**John:** Bye.

Links:

* [The Emmy Award Winners](https://www.emmys.com/awards/nominees-winners) Congrats Craig!
* [WGA Election Results](https://www.wga.org/news-events/news/press/wgaw-announces-2019-officers-and-board-of-directors-election-results)
* [She Said: Breaking the Sexual Harassment Story That Helped Ignite a Movement](https://www.amazon.com/She-Said-Breaking-Harassment-Movement/dp/0525560343) by Jodi Kantor and Megan Twohey
* [Why I Quit the Writer’s Room](https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/06/opinion/sunday/walter-mosley.html) by Walter Mosley
* [Professional Writing and the Rise of the Amateur](https://johnaugust.com/2006/professional-writing-and-the-rise-of-the-amateur)
* [John August](https://twitter.com/johnaugust) on Twitter
* [Craig Mazin](https://twitter.com/clmazin) on Twitter
* [John on Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/johnaugust/?hl=en)
* [Outro](http://johnaugust.com/2013/scriptnotes-the-outros) by Jon Spurney ([send us yours!](http://johnaugust.com/2014/outros-needed))

Email us at ask@johnaugust.com

You can download the episode [here](http://traffic.libsyn.com/scriptnotes/scriptnotes_ep_419_professionalism.mp3)

Scriptnotes, Ep 417: Idea Management, Transcript

October 4, 2019 Scriptnotes Transcript

The original post for this episode can be found [here](https://johnaugust.com/2019/idea-management).

**John August:** Hello and welcome. My name is John August.

**Craig Mazin:** My name is Craig Mazin.

**John:** And this is Episode 417 of Scriptnotes, a podcast about screenwriting and things that are interesting to screenwriters.

Today on the podcast we’re going to take a look at the issue of idea management. What do you do with all of those half-formed ideas for various things to write? We’ll also discuss screenwriter’s quotes and answer some listener questions. To help us out on all of this, welcome back Aline Brosh McKenna.

**Craig:** Yay.

**Aline Brosh McKenna:** Woo! What!

**Craig:** I almost want to do like when Kermit waggles his hands around and goes, “Nah!” I don’t know why. It seems appropriate.

**John:** Yeah, Kermit’s hands are sort of like the inflatable car lot things.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** They wave by their own magic.

**Aline:** Do you guys remember in that original Batman show that sometimes Catwoman would be on?

**Craig:** Of course.

**John:** Oh, I love Catwoman.

**Aline:** But you would watch in the credits to see if she was on that week.

**John:** I never watched the credits to see if she would be on.

**Craig:** I would not.

**Aline:** They changed the credits. If she was going to be in that episode it would be like, “And…” and then they would show a picture of her. And I would be very excited because I knew that it was going to be a Batman episode with Catgirl. Catgirl or Batgirl?

**Craig:** No, no, Batgirl or Catwoman. Catwoman was Eartha Kitt.

**Aline:** Catwoman.

**Craig:** Catwoman was Eartha Kitt. But I don’t remember who Batgirl was. Did they have a Batgirl on that original Adam West show?

**John:** I bet they did because the commissioner’s daughter was Batgirl. Here’s maybe what you’re suggesting though is we need to change the introductory bloops if it’s going to be an Aline episode so everyone knows, oh my gosh, this is an Aline episode.

**Aline:** Yes. And I can sing something and just mock something up.

**John:** Before we get started to our big topics we have some follow up listener questions and I thought maybe Aline would read the question because you’ve never gotten to read a question for us.

**Aline:** Great. Oh, it’s this question that I tried to shove back at you? OK, I’m going to read a question.

**Craig:** Great.

**Aline:** Lochiel writes, “I grew up with D&D basic, then advanced, and played up through Gen 2. I love or loved D&D, but Dungeon World is in my opinion so much better. The game is much less crunchy and can be learned in an hour. The best part of the game is that the players and the DM share narrative control in a much more collaborative way. It would be beyond awesome to witness some people as creative as you guys playing Dungeon World.

**Craig:** Yeah, it would.

**John:** Well, Craig, yeah, that’s good. So, maybe we can discuss some Dungeon World here.

**Aline:** This is obviously a question for me.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** Yes. 100%.

**Aline:** And my answer to this would be that I would think that Dungeon World would be a store where you could buy stuff for your dungeon.

**Craig:** Like a sex dungeon?

**Aline:** Yeah.

**John:** Yeah.

**Aline:** That’s what I would think. Where you would be kitting up for your BDSM dungeon. Is that not correct?

**Craig:** Right. It’s your BDSM superstore.

**Aline:** That’s what I would think it was.

**Craig:** Yeah, come on down to Dungeon World. [laughs]

**John:** So this is follow up on our episode from last week with Alison Luhrs from Wizards of the Coast. Wizards of the Coast makes Dungeons & Dragons, the official Dungeons & Dragons. Dungeon World is a separate gaming system that is very free-form, very loose, and Craig you and I actually did play a campaign in Dungeon World. I DM’d one. And I liked it more than you liked it. It is very free-form and loose. And I think we found it a little bit too free-form and loose. Is that accurate?

**Craig:** Yeah. I think so. I mean, the story part of playing Dungeons & Dragons is definitely a huge part of it. And, look, Lochiel, it’s really just a question of preference, right? I mean, you’re sort of arguing that vanilla tastes better than chocolate and some people will agree and some people won’t. I prefer Dungeons & Dragons or say like Pathfinder which is a similar, because I enjoy some of the rules minutia. I enjoy the constraints of combat. I think that’s fun. I think it’s just the leveling up and all that stuff. I just, I like it. I like it more. It gives me more of what I want.

But I also understand where some people would be like actually that’s the worst part of it all. I just like pretending and talking and such. The one thing I will say about Dungeon World is it feels a bit arbitrary. In other words success and failure feel a bit kind of at the DM’s whim as opposed to kind of influenced by statistical calculation.

**John:** So I remember Michael Gilvarry being frustrated like when is it my turn to swing a sword. The lack of initiative and the lack of sort of structure within combat was frustrating to him.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** But I do enjoy reading other games’ sort of inherent mechanics and seeing sort of how they do stuff. Like I think the new Paranoia has a really cool system for how it works. There’s a role-playing game called Kids on Bikes which is very much a Stranger Things. And how that all works in success and failure is clever. But you know what? I like Fifth Edition Dungeons & Dragons. I’m old school.

**Craig:** Yeah. I’m with you. And Aline obviously we know that you strongly prefer Pathfinder.

**Aline:** Do you have a question on fall fashion?

**John:** We do. We have so many.

**Craig:** We do.

**Aline:** Something about belted tweed jackets?

**Craig:** Let me ask you a question, in all seriousness Aline.

**Aline:** High-waisted leather pants?

**Craig:** Am I a spring, a fall, a winter? What am I?

**Aline:** Oh, no, that whole thing is a scam.

**Craig:** That’s garbage?

**John:** That color theory?

**Aline:** I’m saying in terms of your look–

**Craig:** Oh yeah, yeah, my look.

**Aline:** Yeah. You’re in the hoodie and J-Crew shirt area. But, you know, Craig, if I took you to a mall I could work with the existing aesthetic but I could tone it up.

**Craig:** You could plus it. Come on down to Dungeon World. We’ve got– [laughs]

**Aline:** We could do that. But you might want to do that with Melissa.

**Craig:** Meh.

**John:** Let’s transition to a topic that we all sort of know more about. So, a story that was in the news this last week was about the controversy over sequels to Crazy Rich Asians and who was getting paid what for it. Without diving too deep into that situation, I thought it was useful for us to have a conversation about how are screenwriter quotes even figured out or even what quotes are. How does a screenwriter know how much they’re worth and how much they’re being paid for a project? Because over the course of 20 years I’ve seen the amount I’m being paid per project go up and go down for reasons that probably wouldn’t be apparent to somebody outside the system.

So we haven’t really talked about money as a screenwriter for a while, so let’s talk about how much a screenwriter is worth.

**Aline:** So one of the things that changed and I think it’s about four or five years ago was no quotes. A no-quote thing was issued.

**John:** Tell me how you perceive that.

**Aline:** To me it was perceived a little bit like there’s no quotes, tell me your quotes. Because it is a world where you’re sort of making things up. You know, Hollywood is an interesting system in that your pay rises based on certain intangibles. And they are not just how the things you’ve written have performed in the public sphere. They can also be determined by oh you wrote a script that got a director. You wrote a script that attracted actors. You wrote a script that people like. You wrote a script that got a bidding war. Even if those things didn’t get made. And that’s why I think that system seems really byzantine irrational to people because it is based on intangibles. And it’s a marketplace where things are worth what someone will pay for them.

**John:** Craig, could you start us out, the conversation. Talk to us about the floor of how much somebody gets paid. Because I think we need to talk about scale before we talk about above scale.

**Craig:** Yeah. And maybe also just quickly before we talk about no-quote system is, we should probably talk about what the yes-quote system is, too. A lot of people see this phrase “quote system” and they don’t know. So, first thing, the floor of what a writer gets paid in Hollywood when you’re working on a Writers Guild project, that’s going to be pretty much everything other than most feature animation. It’s determined by the Writers Guild. It’s determined by our collective bargaining agreement. So every three years the Writers Guild negotiates a new deal with the AMPTP. That’s the organization that essentially represents the companies in those negotiations. And that is the minimum we can be paid.

So, you start from there. And then because our business is an over-scale business, which makes us different. Typically a union will negotiate salary floors for everybody working in the plant. So if you’re a welder you make this much money per hour. And if you’re a welder for this many years you make this much money per hour. In our business, no. It’s all over the place. Most people are making more than scale and how much more than scale is up to you and your representatives and the marketplace, which is where the quote system comes in to play.

And all the quote system means is that you’ve been paid some amount of money by someone that someone else agrees is legitimate. Meaning I go to Sony, they say, OK, we want to hire you for something. And then my representatives say, “Well his quote for that service is blotty-blah because Disney paid him that.” That’s it. That’s the sum total of the quote system.

Now, doing better than your quote or when they say no-quote, that’s a whole other ball of wax.

**Aline:** Right. They can’t do that, though. They can’t do that anymore. They can’t ask for your quotes and they can’t–

**John:** Let’s talk about the change. So, traditionally over the last 15 years, ten years ago, that was the starting point of any discussion. So the very initial projects I was hired to write I got paid scale. Probably most of us got paid scale, which is the minimum they could possibly pay us. It’s like getting minimum wage. And then after you’d had a couple projects, things get made, you start creeping above that. And so if I got $200,000 on a project, you know, the next time I was going to make a deal for some place my quote was $200,000. And so we were trying improve upon that.

But as Aline is saying they’re not supposed to be asking for quotes anymore.

**Craig:** Right.

**Aline:** Right. So then it becomes a supply and demand question ostensibly. But one of the things that if it sounds like a somewhat amorphous system, it is. And so obviously it leads to and can lead to unfairness because a lot of these things are perceptual. And you can’t control perceptual things. You can’t, you know, when your agent comes back and says, “Well, they perceive that this happened as opposed to this happening on this project and that’s why you’re going to get this and not that.” There’s not a lot you can say back.

And I have a friend who has been trying really hard to make it so that everybody publicizes what they get paid because, you know, especially if you’re in a group setting like a television show and you want to know, OK, what are other supervising producers with six years of staff experience, what are they getting, you’re only getting that anecdotally or through your representatives. So some people are an advocate of everyone should just publish what they’re getting paid so then you can compare. But you are in this world of what in your resume earns what dollars.

And I will say that because the atmosphere has changed a little bit more in terms of like we do discuss bias more, I have now numerous times been told, “Hey, I think if you were, I mean, a man you would get paid differently. And the demand for your services would command a different price.” You can’t obviously prove that and you can’t “accuse” people of that. But, again, whenever you’re in the realm of perceptual things with humans it’s something we’ve talked about before, like people’s idea of what a director looks like is a 30 to 60-year-old man with some facial hair, you know, and cargo shorts or pants, or some kind of a vest. And that’s what they picture. So when they look at a 90-year-old – sorry, 90-year-old.

**Craig:** No, do it. I like that.

**Aline:** Yeah, a 90-year-old works. Or a hundred pound fashionably dressed 26-year-old female, just for example, it’s a perceptual thing. And so I have numerous times seen not just in my own career but in other people’s careers where what seems to me that people are doing equally well and then come to find out that the men are being paid more. And that’s not just true with screenwriters, obviously. I think that’s across the board in Hollywood. And I don’t know how you standardize that system without doing kind of what Craig suggests which is publishing people’s salaries so that you can say, “Hey, you know, my movies have earned this much, or my TV shows have gotten this rating, or whatever, and so I see what this person gets paid and I would like to be paid concomitantly with that.

**John:** Nice use of concomitantly. I’ve never tried that word in real life.

**Aline:** But, you know, it is a vague – when you get, you guys know, when you get on the phone with your lawyer so often the first thing they offer you is crazy shocking because in the no-quote environment instead of before where it felt like it was building on the pay you’d gotten sometimes they come back and they’ve made a number that sets you back seven years and the question is why. And it’s based in these things which are, you know, size of the budget, scale of the movie. But again these perceptual things. So, it’s an interesting system because it has, you know, it’s a little bit of the court of the Louis XIV. It’s like Tulip Fever. It’s a little bit things command the price that they command and you can’t really get behind.

But I will say that, you know, some of those things are steeped in assumptions that people make about certain – and it also translates into genres. So certain genres the people make extremely more money than in other genres irrespective of the box office performance. If they think well you can write this super hero movie in success that movie is going to make a lot more money than this movie about three girls on a road trip which, you know.

Anyway, it’s why it’s an imperfect system at the best.

**John:** Well let’s talk about the no quotes in two different ways that it comes up. I think it was California law that changed where you’re not supposed to be asking for quotes on previous things, and so that was a change. The other thing that happened over the last five, seven years is that increasingly projects at studios they really kind of didn’t care what your quote was. They said like we are paying X dollars for this project, are you interested or not interested. And so things that are like this a $500,000, it’s not more than that, and that’s a thing that changed, too. And that was a supply and demand thing as well because there were fewer projects.

**Aline:** Absolutely.

**John:** And so some of us had to take a haircut to take some of those projects on. So there’s an objective reality which is the dollars you’re being paid, but the subjective quality is how much are you worth. And value is not an easily calculable thing. It is a matter of opinion and that is a reality.

**Aline:** And what you’re saying, the landscape of the business is changing and another really interesting factor in this is television and film are fusing and melding and, you know, what does years of experience in television, what does that translate into feature wise? When I started they would disregard your television quotes in features and they would disregard your feature quotes in television as if you had been fixing airplanes an then you show up to paint a Renaissance master.

**Craig:** They still do that.

**Aline:** Guys, these things are related. So they are still doing this. And I think Craig you experienced this.

**Craig:** Oh yeah.

**Aline:** But that’s going to change as more people are doing both, freely doing both, moving back and forth. And they are going to expect their high quotes in some areas to translate into quotes in other areas because what is the big difference. What is this artificial gulf that we’ve created?

**Craig:** Well, when we talk about all of this stuff, I mean, the amusing part is the law may say you can’t ask what their quote is, and yet they’ll know because they talk to each other. This is something that maybe people don’t know. The division within each studio that negotiates how much a writer gets paid is called Business Affairs. So it’s different than people who are hiring you. This is another interesting thing. Usually, well I guess it’s sort of like in a big corporation human resources is there to determine salaries, right. So you get hired by somebody and then they send you over to HR and a negotiation occurs. In Hollywood it’s business affairs. And the business affairs executives pick up the phone and call each other. They know exactly what you’ve paid.

And, more to the point, when it’s time for you to make a deal if you like the amount of money you just got paid you’re telling them. So, we can say it’s a no-quote time but it’s not. What you just got paid is known by both sides. Or, it is confirmable by both sides. So that’s the first thing.

And the second thing is when we talk about what you’re worth we’re talking about what the market decides they’re going to pay you at that moment. The hard part is it has absolutely nothing to do with your actual worth as a writer. What you’re being paid now is actually what you were worth. It’s never what you are worth. It’s what you were worth before this moment.

So when you’re a new writer you are worth nothing. [laughs] You were, right? That’s all you have to show is nothing so they pay you like that. When you just had a hit movie they pay you like what you were worth on the hit movie. They’re always behind. They’re always lagging.

**Aline:** When you as a creative person become part of a negotiation I’ve always found it really challenging because there’s things that I just want to do them. And so I don’t want to get immersed too much in the pay because I’m desperate to do it. And your representatives in a way are there to buffer that enthusiasm so that you have, you have a stronger hand. Because if you’re saying to your lawyer I’ll just take, just take it, just take it, you’re really cutting them off at the knees. But if it’s something you’re dying to do, you know, we’re not usually driven by money. We’re driven by the love of the material. And so it’s very challenging just to empower your reps to say, “Well, if it’s shitty walk away from it,” when it’s something you want to do. And you have to have some sense of like, no, this one is worth it. Maybe I’ll take a little pay cut on this one because I believe in this and I think in success this will really work for me.

But I have always found that transition from you’re talking to the creative executives and you’re all on the same page and it feels great and you’re going to go do this thing and then the first offer comes in and your lawyer is like, “This is atrocious.” And it’s hard not to take it personally. And sometimes it is personal in the sense that they are lowballing you because they think they can for whatever reason and it hurts.

**Craig:** They do it every time. They literally do it every time.

**Aline:** Your lawyer is trained to say, “Hey, don’t feel differently about this project because of this,” but it’s almost impossible not to feel that way. And because business affairs is a different department and you’re dealing with people who only deal with money and only deal with deals, but then they have to translate these intangibles of like we really, you know, the creative person has their heart set on John August. When they first read the book that was the only person they could picture so they desperately want John August. But the business affairs person has to pretend like they don’t care if it’s John August. And sometimes they do.

**John:** Well let’s talk about leverage because that is the way that a screenwriter ultimately increases the amount they’re paid for that project. And leverage can come from a couple ways. But the biggest one is the freedom to walk away, to say like, “You know what, I’m not taking this deal. So if this is where we’re stopping then I’m stopping and I’m moving on to the next thing.”

Leverage can also come from kind of being perceived as being irreplaceable by other creative elements. So that director desperately wants you. That star desperately wants you. We have a friend who is sort of the only person who can get along with a certain actor and so she’s worth a lot on those projects because she’s the only one who can sort of handle that person. So those are reasons why a person can get paid more.

I would say classically coming off of a hit movie, like you got that bump on your next movie and your next movie after it, I see that happening a little bit less now than five years ago just because the business has changed. Again, the supply and demand of how many projects there are out there is different.

Another way that you can increase your quote or the amount that you’re being paid on this project is by working for one of the new places. And the new places will tend to overpay because they’re desperate to get in business with certain people.

**Aline:** In certain moments. I mean, you know, if it’s your passion project you’ve got to be prepared to take a haircut. But I think one of the things that’s interesting, you know, the three of us have been in this business a long time and it was kind of the same for a long time. It was a very calcified, for better or for worse, it was understandable. And some of the things of like, Aline, you’re not going to get paid as much as the other people, I mean, those were codified, too.

Technology and the rise of all these other means of distributing have effected everything. And it’s exactly what you said, you know, movie quotes are not what they were, TV quotes are not what they were. You’re in a sort of a more freeform environment and there’s wonderful things about that but there’s also, you know, in some ways they have us over a barrel and they are trying to redefine backend. Redefine all the ways in which screenwriters are being paid. And it’s one of the reasons there’s sort of a lot of tumult and discussion among writers because I’ve never seen a more rapid period of change.

**Craig:** We’re also in the middle of a rapidly increasing income disparity which echoes what’s going on in the economy at large and the world at large. What used to be a kind of gentle bell curve has been accelerating even more and more, so now the question really isn’t, well, what’s my quote and how much am I being paid and can I get a bump – that’s what they say is a raise is a bump. Can I get a bump? What’s happening is that the writing business is starting to separate between employees, just standard old employees who are more and more just being pushed towards scale, and mega deals.

In my career the thought of a writer earning nine figures – that would be over $100,000,000 – for a deal that went on for two or three years was kind of astonishing. It’s happening all the time now. And so we are moving out of what we’re all familiar with. And the mega deals seemingly don’t care about, well, I guess you get what you get. And what’s concerning to me is that the opportunities for new writers coming in are going to be defined by this new system which is essentially, oh yeah, we don’t really do live over-scale. Do you know what I mean? That’s the fear is that over-scale essentially just goes away and everything is just sort of scale. It’s like, well–

**Aline:** I also just, I mean, we’ve talked about this before, but I don’t know how I would have broken into the feature business given what I write. I would absolutely now be going in through the TV door.

**Craig:** Of course. Of course.

**Aline:** Where minimums are different. But, you know, just to be writing sort of character-based comedies often, most often with female leads, they’re making so few that – there used to be a pipeline and all of that is going now into these television–so the other thing is that the feature business is much more steeped in–

**John:** In giant IP. Yeah. Absolutely.

**Aline:** And so it is a different – if you are person who can take one of those pieces of IP and make it make sense, there’s wild rewards in that. And those people’s careers have skyrocketed. And also it’s kind of sucked up a lot of our A-list talent. You know, I always think of like people who would have been doing Three Days of the Condor or All the President’s Men or all those, you know, Sydney Pollack, Alan Pakula, you know, a lot of those movies. They’re doing big genre franchise movies. And I wish that they could do both at the same time because I do mourn a little bit the original character-based movies that we all grew up on. And because a lot of the people grew up loving these genre pieces they’re making these IP movies. And I do mourn a little bit the movies they might have made if we were still making those personal pieces.

**Craig:** They’re gone.

**Aline:** They’re on TV.

**John:** They’re on TV.

**Craig:** They’re on TV. And when it comes to movies you’re absolutely right. They would not – if you were starting out and you were writing romantic comedies or character studies or smaller let’s say call it a $25 million budget with a female lead, no question. They’re just not making them. And nor are they making the movies that I was writing when I started out. If you want to make sort of a family PG-13 live action or PG live action comedy–

**John:** That’s me.

**Craig:** Yeah. It’s television. You know, you’re going to Netflix now. They’re just not doing it.

**Aline:** But unless you have Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.

**John:** Or Aladdin.

**Aline:** Or Aladdin.

**Craig:** Exactly. But even then, I have to say even now I got to argue that in 2019 Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is a harder bet. Because we talk about these big movies and IP and stuff but we’re not saying the word “superhero” which we need to. Because the superhero thing has essentially transformed Hollywood. The theatrical movie business is the superhero movie business. Period. The end.

**Aline:** And we’re way deep in the bin there. People are like, oh, are you pitching on Oatmeal Boy, and you’re like, what? There was one issue about that character in 1964. We’re deep, deep in the well there. And there are so many kind of big classic pieces of novels that have yet to be adapted. It’s so funny because somebody once said to me they never made a Mata Hari movie. And it’s just something that I think about. But if you had done a Mata Hari comic in 1972, you know, and people collected it and whatever you could shove that through.

But it is funny. We just have gotten – I run into people and they’re working on superhero stuff that – I mean, obviously I’m not an expert. But we’ve gone deep, deep in the well there.

**Craig:** Well, they don’t even have to go that deep in the well. They just remake.

**Aline:** Keep making the ones, yeah.

**Craig:** I mean, I think everybody kind of giggled when the fourth version of Spider Man had come out. But now it’s sort of like, oh, what’s this year’s Spider Man? That’s it. Just every year there will be a new Spider Man. And every year there will be a new Batman.

**Aline:** That’s like those old Tom Mix westerns, you know, from early Hollywood. You would just go that character, they would just do latest adventures or comic books.

**Craig:** The only thing is like in the old days they would crank out programmers, like Wallace Beery wrestling pictures, or [Odors] as those of us who do crossword puzzles love to say. But they were low budget. They were cheap stuff to flood the theaters.

**John:** They’re filler.

**Craig:** Nobody does that anymore because it’s the opposite now. Everything has to be a massive event. So either you’re doing superhero movies or you’re doing Star Wars movies. And then there’s animation. Or, in the case of Disney, live action animation. But there is no space really for other stuff. There’s the tiniest space which I find myself now when I’m working in movies that’s where I live. In this tiny space. Which is why I’m quite happy to be embarking on a television journey because, you know, I–

**Aline:** I’m just imagining you trying to pitch Chernobyl as a feature. Like having ten meetings in a week where you go in and pitch Chernobyl and executives sort of come in expecting you – what does Craig have? Like expecting some fun comedy with big comedy stars. And here’s [laughs] Craig saying–

**Craig:** That’s why I didn’t do it.

**Aline:** So he’s vomiting. He’s bleeding out from his face. And, you know–

**John:** There’s male nudity but it’s not funny male nudity.

**Craig:** Right.

**Aline:** But there was a world where you would have conceivably pitched and made that movie and that’s why I think there is a giant hole in the marketplace for somebody to start a company which makes a lot of the stuff that’s now going to Netflix. Other kinds of stories, character-based stories, but female leads, non-white leads. To sort of have a woke, for lack of a better term, studio that opens its doors to everybody who wants to be doing stuff like that because if you make them for a price they can work huge. And the upside can be huge. And you can make Girls Trip and you can make Mamma Mia and you can make Get Out. And for someone to really open the doors on a big company like that that is run by executives who are not all named Matt. That would be incredible and I think we would all run to that person.

And I understand that financially now the amount of money that you need to be that person is almost too astronomical to exist. But I am waiting desperately for someone to make the superstore, the big box version of Fox 2000 with big funding that we can all run to for those projects. Because people have an enormous hunger to still make them and to see them on a big screen.

**John:** Agreed.

**Craig:** Question for you. Didn’t you just describe Megan Ellison and Annapurna? And didn’t they just go bankrupt?

**John:** Or A24. Fox Searchlight.

**Aline:** But are they taking the Girls Trip swings? Are they taking the Mamma Mia swings? Or are they taking more of the art – which again, and love those more arthouse type movies, obviously a thing I love. But I’m talking about more the sort of commercial in-the-box comedy character-based, you know, Bad Moms, Get Out is a good example of, you know–

**Craig:** Well Jason Blum obviously has a very successful business making genre films.

**Aline:** But I’m just talking about non-IP driven original content that is run by and includes a wider swath of the community who are desperate to tell those stories. I am sure every writer, we all have something in our drawer that we would love to do that way. And frankly right now people are going to streamers to do that.

**Craig:** I would. I mean, I’m just being honest with you. I would. I mean, unless I had something – I mean, look, Mamma Mia would be – that’s different because that is IP and all the rest of it. If I had something that was akin to, well, if I had something that I thought was an interesting $25 or $30 million movie I would be going to a streamer without question. Without question.

**Aline:** So maybe that’s a hole in the theatrical feature environment then. Maybe not.

**Craig:** They just don’t do it. I mean, the problem is you’re right. There is this massive hole there. But you can’t get a movie in theaters without distribution. And these major studios control it.

**Aline:** And giant marketing costs.

**Craig:** Well, exactly.

**John:** So there’s a project I’m doing which may end up at Netflix. And part of the discussion was it was hard to envision what the Friday night of this movie would be. It’s just like could you get enough butts in seats on Friday night to make this smaller comedy work. But if it were on a streamer that pressure is just not there. And so I think people would find it in their own time and it wouldn’t be that sense of like it has to be this giant weekend.

**Aline:** Interestingly though, when those movies drop on Netflix they do get humungous, crazy-huge eyeball numbers on the first weekend.

**Craig:** So they claim. [laughs] So they claim.

**Aline:** No, well I do believe that. Because–

**John:** Always Be My Maybe is a good example.

**Aline:** You guys know you turn on your streamer box and that’s the first thing there. And they have this marketing which is insane. You pay to subscribe to this service and it’s pushing something on you. And you’re not sure what you want to watch and everybody looks at each other and says great. And it’s new and it’s being promoted to you. So, you know, there’s nothing – so I don’t know, maybe this new studio that we’re creating is a subscription service.

**John:** So let’s bring this around and talk about where we’re at and sort of what we can do to sort of make this better.

**Aline:** The quotes?

**John:** The quotes. I do think in a world where quotes become less important the transparency in terms of what you’re getting paid is helpful. And I see more of that happening in TV. And in TV there are clear rungs that you’re going up through. So if people publicize like I’m a story editor on this show, this is what I’m getting, that is truly helpful for people figuring out am I getting paid more or less than sort of the average for this role.

A thing I’m going to probably do and I’ll just commit to actually doing it now is on Aladdin it’s going to be one of the probably last movies that’s going to have traditional residuals. And so I’ll just publicize, as I get each green envelope on Aladdin I will put up on the site how much I’m getting from those envelopes because it’s going to be huge. That’s a big movie and this is classically how writers were able to make a living is the constant residuals that come through.

And those are going to go away, too. And that’s another future topic, but figuring out how we sustain a career without the good residuals we’ve traditionally had is going to be a challenge.

**Aline:** Data would help the representatives. Because if you had data about what everyone was getting paid your agent could say, you know, this person and this person have a similar track record, or this person has made a special contribution in this way. And here’s another instance where someone did something similar and this is how they were recompensed. So, secrecy always benefits certain groups.

**Craig:** I agree. I mean, having representatives would also help representatives. Because when I listen to this—

**Aline:** Well, the lawyers generally do the, right?

**Craig:** Well lawyers do the negotiating of the hard numbers. Or a lot of the internal numbers. But one thing that agencies can do, particularly the big ones, is say I can tell you exactly what this person got or this person got. They’re really good when you can talk about participation, backend. They know how those things work. Because we’re not the only deals that impact us. Again, because we’re over-scale there are other people like actors and directors and agents who are making certain kinds of deals that we can also make, depending on what the kind of movie is.

So having more information like that is great.

**Aline:** And also these are intangibles, agents have long relationships with these folks and bring them numerous people. And so they can be saying, “Hey, F-you. Step up. You know what’s right.”

**John:** And at the same time they can also be saying, you hope that they’re always advocating on your own behalf. But they could also be advocating on other people’s behalves or trying to get this other thing to happen.

**Aline:** Or trying to protect a relationship.

**John:** Exactly. So it does work both ways.

**Craig:** It does. I mean, we’ve all paid 10% to agents our entire careers I guess because we assumed that it was working in our favor.

**John:** All right. Let’s move on to the marquee topic for today which is idea management. So this came up to me because there’s a couple projects that I’m sort of noodling on, so I’ve not really started writing them yet but they are things that are in my head. They’re like the shiny jewels that I pick up and hold in my virtual hand and stare at them and do a little work on and then set them back down. And we haven’t really talked about this on the show which is that sort of early stage of holding onto and sorting through your ideas before you start writing and some best practices on that.

Because what really occurred to me this past week is I had some insomnia and I realized I was doing that rather than actually letting myself fall asleep. I was like so worried about holding onto this idea and focusing on it that I couldn’t set it down and actually go to sleep. So, Craig let’s say you have a good idea, it’s midnight, you’re headed to bed. You have a good idea. Do you get out of bed and write it down? What do you do with that idea that occurs to you?

**Craig:** If there’s something that happens right there while I’m in bed, my iPad is on my nightstand so I’ll just send myself a quick email. I have in the past said to myself you’ll remember this and then I don’t. I just remember not remembering it and being very angry. But that’s not really where most of my thinking happens. By the time I’m going to bed I’m just tired and I want to go to bed. Most of my thinking happens, well, most of my freeform thinking happens in the shower. That’s where I like to just think.

**Aline:** We’ve established this.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**Aline:** We’ve had a lot of mind images of Craig in the shower over the years if you’re a Scriptnotes fan.

**John:** Aline, you have that late night idea, what do you do with that idea?

**Aline:** So I do a lot of my thinking in the bathtub.

**Craig:** Oh, it’s the same thing.

**Aline:** It is the same thing. A bathtub. But also when I go to sleep I try and think about something that I’m noodling on or have to solve. And I don’t think I wake up instantly with the answer but I do try and noodle on it because I know that that’s a fertile period. I will say like Rachel and I frequently had this conversation – I don’t write things down very often because I feel like if it’s a good idea it will persist and it will return to me. And I know a lot of people who think I’m insane who are real note-takers. And for them they need to see it concretized. If I start writing on an idea too soon I’ll kill it. It’s like I’ve over-watered the plant.

So I have to kind of keep it in a back-burnery place where only my subconscious is working on it until it’s kind of formed before I start putting voice to it, because there’s something about rendering it that sort of makes it less magical and interesting for me. So if I’m going to email myself something it’s a line of dialogue. Sometimes I think of lines of dialogue in the bathroom or in the bed. And then sometimes it’s plot stuff that I cannot fix. So, I would say the bathtub especially is a place where I go, oh, you know what, that’s where I go. And then I will put notes – I usually use the notes app. And kind of get it down.

But again I try and get it down in a skeletal way because somehow if I fully express an idea in print it doesn’t engage me in the same way.

**John:** I totally get that. You just did an over-watering metaphor which I really do like because it does kind of feel like it’s a garden that you have to tend every once and a while because if you don’t actually pay attention to the thing it can just wither and die on its own. And sometimes it’s best that it wither and die. Like it really did not want to be anything that you pursued. But also things can overgrow and just become too crazy.

And like I’ll try not to put something down in print and fix it in one form because I know it’s growing in different things and it could be combining with a different idea. You know, these really inchoate ideas they’re sort of competing for attention in your mind. They’re trying to get brain cycle. Like, no, no, think about me, think about me. And that’s the only way that they can actually become real projects.

**Craig:** Yeah. I don’t, you know me, my whole thing is I don’t write the script until I know exactly what the hell it is that I’m writing anyway. So in a weird way what we’re talking about here is this kind of idea gathering process. That is the process for me. I’m gathering ideas and writing things down on notecards and putting snippets of dialogue in little clustery files. But I don’t start writing anything until I see it. It’s like, oh, I always think of this wonderful scene from Searching for Bobby Fischer. Do you love Searching for Bobby Fischer the way I love it?

**John:** I do not recall it well, so obviously I don’t.

**Craig:** My god. Aline? Big Searching for–?

**Aline:** I haven’t seen it recently.

**Craig:** Oh, Steven Zaillian wrote and directed, brilliant. And there’s a moment where Ben Kinsley as the grandmaster is teaching this little kid. And he’s looking at the board and Ben Kingsley says, “You can get to checkmate in five. Don’t move until you see it.” And the kid is looking at it and he goes, “I don’t see it.” And Ben Kingsley says, “Don’t move until you see it.” And the kid says, “I don’t see it.” And Ben Kingsley says, “Here, I’ll help you. And he takes his arm and he wipes all the pieces off the board and they all clatter to the floor. It’s gorgeous. And he says, “There.” So now the kid can look at the blank board and then imagine the pieces and then he sees it.

And a lot of times for me I’m like don’t write it until you see it. That’s the way I kind of think about it. Don’t write it until you see it.

**Aline:** There’s also a thing that can happen where if you iterate something before you’re ready it creates a box or a fence in your brain and you can never get over it to where the good idea was. And so I fear that a little bit. Like you don’t want to start putting in those 2x4s and beams until you really know what you’re doing because you can get trapped in your edifice and then you can’t ever – because I was talking to another writer yesterday about sometimes you see something on the page and it’s so not what you want that you’re like I don’t remember writing, I don’t remember being a writer, I don’t remember what stories are. Have I ever seen a movie? It can block you.

So, I’ve written – a lot of the stuff I’ve done have been originals, 27 Dresses, Morning Glory, Crazy Ex, were all ideas that I had for a very long time. And what I tend to do is I store them up and I think about them until I meet the person.

**John:** Now did you have a list of those ideas?

**Aline:** No.

**John:** So just floating in your head somewhere? It’s like I want to do a movie about that.

**Aline:** They’re floating in my head. And then 27 Dresses I was like, you know what, this is a good idea. I should do this. Because my best friend Kate had been in 12 weddings at that point and it was insane. And I could see that the wedding industry was getting to this point where she was asked to do stuff that was bonkers.

And I pitched it to a lot of people. I think I pitched that to 11 people and the person that I didn’t know who latched on to it right away was John Glickman. So when I find often a collaborator or person I know this is the right person who can help, you know, water this with me and then I’m in a process. And with Morning Glory that was JJ. I pitched it to JJ I think the first time I met him. And then Crazy Ex was an idea, the title and the character – because I think there’s – I really relish and am giggly about all the moments in my life when I’ve been a crazy ex, even if it’s just like I want that sweater and there’s only one left in the small, you know, and I stalked it. And I always loved that idea.

And when I met Rachel I went, boom, that’s how to do it. So, I think it’s nice to carry around a little suitcase of notions in your brain and then when you think, oh, you know what? Now’s the moment to do it. This wedding stuff is getting so over the top that a movie about a perpetual bridesmaid, this is a good time to do it. So either the circumstances or you meet a person or you think of the genre. You know, you have an idea and you think, oh, the way to do this is, you know, this is a movie about terrible in-laws, but it’s Meet the Parents, or it’s Get Out. It takes a certain form.

And to me if the thing isn’t good I’ll forget about it.

**John:** Craig, do you have an idea suitcase?

**Craig:** No. I’m not a big idea person like that. In other words I’m not a big “here’s an idea for a movie.” I was like that early in my career because early in my career you were rewarded for that. Over time it seems to me that my skill isn’t so much in coming up with a wonderful idea for a movie. My skill it seems is figuring out how to write a movie. So, and that kind of meshed nicely with the way the business evolved because suddenly—

**Aline:** Well I would argue that that’s not true of Chernobyl.

**Craig:** Well, Chernobyl isn’t an idea. In other words, Chernobyl – it’s a topic.

**Aline:** The way you did it. Well, it’s a topic, but the way you did it and the way you chronicled it.

**John:** That’s execution rather than idea.

**Craig:** Correct. I think of that as actually the best example of the fact that I can execute things. But I don’t think of it as like, in other words what you do there – I used to do it. I don’t. I don’t know if I was ever really good at it to be honest with you. I mean—

**Aline:** So just to bring this back around, one of the reasons I’ve always done that is because that’s how I got hired. And there was not a lot else out for me. I was not being offered the big IP. Even back in the day I wasn’t getting Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. I wasn’t well-known enough in those days. And that’s, you know, that’s why I chased Devil Wears Prada. Talk about Crazy Ex-Girlfriend, I chased that. Every single time they replaced the writer I said to my agent, “Get me in, get me in, get me in.” Because there’s so few things like that.

So I wasn’t getting – because there weren’t – there were so few pieces like that. Annie is one. Weirdly Cinderella was a thing that I came up with and pitched, strangely. That’s how long ago that was. That was before they were doing that. Annie is an example of like that’s a big piece that got given to me, but one of the reasons I did that is because for whatever reason I just have not been gifted with things that already had momentum. Annie was one, but not often.

**Craig:** At least in the beginning I certainly wasn’t either. So I was coming up with ideas and things. Some of them were really bad, but then they made them. Right? So they made some movies, some of them did OK. Most of them didn’t do well. What happened was I got stuck on sequels. And I guess at that point I was able to demonstrate some sort of executional ability.

But, yeah, when you start out you do kind of need to go here is my suitcase, here are my samples. Would you like to buy? And I do remember, you know, I mean, look, there’s a movie that I co-wrote with my partner back then called Senseless. It’s just a bad idea for a movie. It’s really just terrible. It’s a terrible idea for a movie.

The reason it got made I think is because it was in the middle of the video era when they would make anything. And, you know what? Penelope Spheeris did her best to direct and Marlon Wayans was really funny. And Matthew Lillard was really funny. But the idea was just dumb. It was just a bad idea for a movie.

**Aline:** Some ideas don’t work.

**Craig:** I mean, but that one honestly mystified me – I remember my writing partner and I were taking a walk and we had just pitched this thing. Because we were, again, we were like we need to get the suitcase out. No one is giving us anything. We have to make our own opportunities. And he said, “Do you think they’ll make that?” And I said not a chance. Not a chance. And then they did.

**Aline:** So one thing I would say for aspiring writers, when you are breaking in and you start to get those round of general meetings they’re going to say to you, “What do you want to write? Is there an article? Is there an idea? What do you have?” Wait a second. Get to know this person. Have a nice general meeting. Just chat in general about their movies. Hope you bump into them. Don’t give your babies, because in the beginning, you know, anybody who wanted to meet with me I’m a more reticent person so I would meet someone and five minutes into it they would say, “What is something you’ve dreamed of writing your whole life?” And I would think I just met you. I don’t know if I want to entrust you with that.

But I’ve seen young writers often, they’re just so excited to be in a meeting with someone that they take one of their idea babies out of their suitcase – not a good place to keep babies.

**Craig:** Put holes in it.

**Aline:** And they give it to someone and then that’s where it loses its momentum. So if you have something that’s near and dear to you in the beginning you might want to write it, or wait until you find someone who is truly a champion. Because the other thing I was naïve about is people take these general meetings with you. They actually haven’t read your work.

And one of the funniest – I don’t know if I’ve told this story on this podcast before – but I was in a meeting, my very first round of general meetings. And while I was sitting there an assistant walked in and said to the executive, “I have that coverage on Jersey Angel you wanted.”

**John:** Your script.

**Aline:** And I was so dumb that I didn’t know that that was – she hadn’t read it. And was taking the meeting as a favor to my agent. And so that was a person saying, “Gee, what are your hopes and dreams. And give me those things that reside in your soul,” who hadn’t actually read my script.

So, just, you know–

**John:** So I’m taking a lot of generals right now because there’s just a bunch of folks who over the years I’ve never met, or all the executives moved from one company to another so I’m just taking those generals now. And I’ve found that, granted I’m not at the beginning of my career, but I will generally go into those meetings with some sense of like, OK, these are the kinds of things they might be looking for. And so I may not pitch a specific story, but I’ll pitch like this is a story area that I’m really interested in. Like I just read an article about this thing and I think there’s probably a great movie to be made that’s looking at the reality of this but also pushes it into this fantasy aspect. And so those are helpful things to have as you go into those things.

Just give them a sense of like what your taste is and what’s interesting to you. And a lot of times I really am pulling some stuff out of the old idea suitcase. Like I’ve always wanted to do something with this place. Or like this old idea, I realize now in 2020 is actually more about this and that is a point of discussion. So, a deal I’m making now was out of one of those general meetings where I had an old thing but I realized like, oh, actually the way you make this story now in 2020 has a whole different [valence].

**Aline:** You said something so brilliant once and I think about it a lot, so I’m going to make you repeat it. Somebody said I have two ideas and I don’t know which one to write. And you said pick the one with the better ending.

**John:** That was Episode 100.

**Aline:** Ah, I love that piece of advice. And to go with that is I would say pick an idea that suggests a structure. Because sometimes I’ve had ideas – that’s why I had not done Crazy Ex because I didn’t know what the structure of that could be. And it wasn’t until Rachel and I started talking about it and I realized it was a TV show so you could kind of examine the prism. I was worried that a movie would be too reductive and broad.

Pick an idea that suggests a structure to you. Because if it just seems like a good idea for a movie, and I will tell you something quite counterintuitive. Things that are set on the backdrop of a wedding, rom-coms, a lot of people their first movie is like, “Oh, it’s the destination wedding. Or it’s the wedding where you find out your divorced parents fall back in love or whatever.” Weddings are brutal structurally because they are not escalating. So, your rehearsal dinner to your ceremony to the football game on the lawn, they don’t have a natural escalation in stakes. Actually it seems like that’s a structure. It’s not. And I’ve wandered down that garden path more than once because I’ve written a bunch of things that have weddings in them. They’re actually very difficult.

If you’re starting out and you have an idea, the one that suggests I have to be there by Tuesday to get a thing is probably the easiest the one, the simpler one to write. Something that suggests a journey. Suggests a story.

**John:** Like your Crazy Ex-Girlfriend example, Arlo Finch I had in my head for a very long time and I just didn’t know what it was. It’s not really a movie. It’s not really a TV show. And then I had a conversation with a middle grade novelist and I realized like, oh, this is a middle grade novel series. That’s what it is. I started writing that night and that became the thing. So, you do hold on to those things not knowing quite what form they want to take, but you know that there’s a thing there that’s interesting and appealing.

**Aline:** But I still think I would still argue Craig that the idea of doing Chernobyl in the way that you did it is a great idea because, you know, you could make a lot of Chernobyl movies but they would have been the more typical accident of the week kind of thing. So it’s just – it’s a cool idea just to examine that because it’s not something that people know enough about. But also the way in which it was done is a cool idea. I think.

**Craig:** Well thank you.

**John:** Take the compliment, Craig. She’s complimenting you.

**Craig:** I mean, you know, I’m not good – I’m really bad at compliments. Mostly when somebody gives me a compliment my mind immediately starts creating a very good rebuttal.

**Aline:** Or you think, “What an idiot? What a dummy?”

**John:** They couldn’t recognize the real me, because if they knew the real me they’d be disappointed.

**Craig:** I don’t think you understand. See, I’m not really very good. That’s kind of, yeah. Well, you know, Chernobyl couldn’t have been a movie anyway. That’s true.

**Aline:** Part of your idea was we’re going to really look at this in a very granular beat-by-beat and the millions and millions of bad decisions that go into something like this. And that’s what makes it a great cautionary tale because all these disasters are a collision of a million mistakes, human and technical. And you need time. You needed episodes for that to unfurl. And a movie might have constrained you. Also because movies are going to follow a more traditional escalation crescendo structure which sometimes things don’t want to be. And those make you be phony.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**Aline:** Sometimes the form is a terrific idea. I haven’t seen it, but doing Emily Dickinson’s life as sort of like an emo-teen-pop thing which they’re doing on Apple, I have no idea what that’s like. But it’s taking the biopic and making it, from what I’ve seen it looks like a cool Ariana Grande video. That’s a cool idea.

**Craig:** Have you guys ever heard someone pronounce biopic “bi-opic?”

**Aline:** Yes.

**Craig:** It’s amazing. Every time it happens I get so excited.

**Aline:** I have to stop correcting. We have a thing in our house but with fewer and less. And two of us are quite strict on it and one of us is really annoyed.

**Craig:** That would be Will, your husband, I’m assuming.

**Aline:** No, he’s a bit of a stickler in a way. One of my children finds it very annoying to be policed.

**John:** And your dogs are like I don’t know what you’re talking about.

**Aline:** Yeah, we’re idiots.

**Craig:** We don’t speak at all.

**John:** Let’s answers some questions here. First question is an audio question from Nathan Morris.

Nathan Morris: Hello, my name is Nathan. I’ll give you a dollar each if you can guess where I’m from by my accident. I’m currently living in New York. I have a question about working with actors. I’m a writer-director. I’m working on a little passion project right now to prove to the world what I can do. It’s all improvised. I wrote large backstory for each of my characters. During casting and workshopping with them was really fun and some ideas come up that the actors thought of about the characters I created.

I used a couple of these in the edit I’m putting together now and I’m wondering should they be credited as writers because they did create the joke? I don’t want to annoy anyone, piss anyone off, or just be a dick. Yeah, so I’d love to know what you guys think about that. I’m especially interested after hearing your Veep episode. Armando Iannucci is one of my heroes.

**Craig:** I’ve got to tell you all I did was listen to his accent for the first half of that question. I have no idea what the question was.

**John:** So here was his question. He made a short that involved a lot of actors who were doing improv.

**Craig:** Oh, yes, yes, yes.

**John:** He is wondering whether he should credit them as writers for the improv.

**Craig:** No. So, the, well, listen, it’s entirely up to you, Nathan, how you go about these things if you are not working within our Writers Guild world. In the Writers Guild world writing credit is for literary material. That means specifically material that has been written down on paper. So ad-libs, things that come up on the day that actors are putting out there are not considered literary material so it’s not creditable as writing.

If you are creating something that is highly improvisational you can consider it. But I would point out that even in shows like—

**Aline:** Curb.

**Craig:** Curb Your Enthusiasm, right, which there is a very strict outline that’s been written but inside of those scenes the dialogue can be often very improvised, those actors are not getting writing credit either. It’s just sort of understood this is how it works. Also I think he’s from South Africa.

**John:** All right. Aline, what is your impression both of what Nathan should do with his actors and where he’s from?

**Aline:** He’s from Australia.

**Craig:** It’s one or the other.

**John:** I’m pretty sure Australia.

**Craig:** Those two are always in my mind competing.

**Aline:** Interesting. Yeah, there’s a lot of the Christopher Guest movies and Curb are examples of the story is preset. They’re given material and then the dialogue is – what I wouldn’t do is spring it on anyone. Just make sure going into it that they know what examples you’re following and that this is how you’re going to be doing it.

It’s different if they’re sitting in a room with you and you’re typing it together.

**John:** Yeah. I think our consensus is that these actors sort of knew going into it that this was an improv situation. They probably don’t have an expectation that you are going to be giving them writing credit for this. But, of course, what we really care about is where you’re from and Nathan has an answer. So I actually heard the answer so I know. But I wasn’t convinced – I was thinking South Africa originally, but I was also thinking it could be a British accent, like a specific one that I was just missing. But let’s hear Nathan give us his answer.

**Craig:** Oh good.

Nathan: My accent is from…New Zealand.

**Craig:** Ah!

**Aline:** Ugh.

Nathan: Aotearoa. That’s the Maori name for my country. And we also have tall poppies [in germ]. Some would say greater than the Australians. Maybe that’s tall poppy syndrome right there. OK, I will stop wasting your time.

**Aline:** I feel bad about that because my sister-in-law is from New Zealand.

**Craig:** It’s really close. I mean, honestly, I mean Australia certainly is closer to New Zealand than South Africa. But I make that mistake, I mush those two together all the time. All the time. Mush those three together I guess all the time. Shame on me.

**John:** Shame on us. Monica asks, “Hi John, what was your budget on God and how did you go about funding it?” So God was a short film I made with Melissa McCarthy in 1998. We shot on 35mm film. We shot on short ends. We got the film pretty cheap but processing is expensive. So the full budget on that was $30,000. You can now make that same movie for $3,000.

**Aline:** John, where can people see The Nines?

**John:** The Nines, anywhere. It’s actually streaming kind of in all the places. It’s on iTunes but it’s also everywhere else.

**Aline:** It’s so good.

**John:** Thank you very much. So Melissa McCarthy’s character in God shows up again in The Nines. And as we all know Melissa McCarthy is a treat and a gem and a wonder of our age.

**Aline:** And Ryan Reynolds in it. It’s really good.

**John:** Thank you. Paul asks, “I watch a lot of movies and notice that it usually starts raining at the beginning of the third act or the end of the second act when things get bad in the story. Is this a tradition that should be used? Is it a crutch? Is there a way to stop using rain as a crutch? Should it be written in the script or left to a cinematography decision? I don’t hate it when I see it but I don’t love it either. It’s in many of my most beloved movies of all time. Help.”

**Aline:** I mean, it’s a huge rom-com trope.

**John:** It is a trope.

**Aline:** We made fun of it on the show. It’s a huge rom-com trope. You know, using the environment to reflect the inner feelings of a character, so as things are darkening the weather is reflecting that. That’s why you can call it out in a comedic sense because climaxes of romances in romantic comedies are people speaking to each other in the rain which is a thing I’ve never done. Dude, it’s raining. Let’s have this fight under an awning. People will stand there getting drenched with rain drenching them. Women with like their shirts drenched having a romantic conversation with someone. So, externalizing people’s emotions in the weather can sometimes reinforce the atmosphere, but sometimes can just make it seem like hilariously people’s emotions are being externalized.

**Craig:** Yeah. It’s a trope. I mean, is it a crutch? I don’t know if it’s a crutch. Although I do agree that there are times when you want to see your characters at a low moment and you decide it’s not enough to just know that they’re feeling terrible. You have to also rain directly on them, like those cartoons where a little cloud follows someone around.

**Aline:** But have you guys ever just stood there while it was raining?

**Craig:** Yeah, no.

**John:** No!

**Aline:** And spoken to someone?

**Craig:** No. I mean, unless I was so depressed because I was at the end of my second act. I mean, that’s the point. It’s silly but there’s a lot of silly stuff in movies. Like the fact that usually people don’t have rear view mirrors in their cars. So, I would say, look—

**Aline:** And they talk to people who are sitting in the middle of the back seat.

**Craig:** And they don’t say goodbye when they hang up a phone.

**Aline:** All these things we love.

**Craig:** All these things we love.

**Aline:** I think it can be cartoony. I mean, I love a sunlit noir. I love a movie where someone is going through some horrible noir. After Dark, My Sweet is the one I think of. Where it’s a noir but it’s Jason Patric being sort of bathed in horrible, horrible California sunshine instead of dark.

**Craig:** Yeah. Glaring hangover light.

**John:** So a thing that people who don’t make movies probably don’t realize is that whenever you write rain in the script, when you actually show up on set it is miserable generally because like the rain towers and the whole process of getting people wet and getting people dry and shooting in the rain is a huge hassle. You’re trying to protect everything. So I learned this firsthand on Go which does have rain in the third act. And it’s a hassle. It’s fully appropriate in Go. It actually serves a character purpose. It’s part of the reason they hit Ronna. But good lord, rain is a brutal thing.

**Craig:** Rain is hard to do. One thing, Paul, you would not do is leave it up to the cinematographer. The cinematographer does not make that decision. The cinematographer has to figure out how to shoot it. But, yes, it is absolutely within your domain to write that into a script. And then, you know, people can discuss after if they want to do it or not. But, yeah, it’s definitely something you should be deciding.

**John:** It is time for our One Cool Things. Now, Craig you and David Kwong just finished a massive puzzling expedition. It was like five days of work I believe?

**Craig:** Six.

**John:** Six days. So I’m going to break precedent and I’m actually going to recommend a puzzle thing. This is called Reg Ex Crossword. And so it’s the perfect Venn diagram intersection of what’s interesting to me and what’s interesting to you. So Reg Ex or regular expressions are the computer code that helps do pattern matching. So it’s how you find text within text. It is really esoteric and strange. This is a crossword puzzle situation where the clues are actually just regular expressions so you have to figure out what letters could possibly match up with those things. It’s very ingeniously done.

Craig, I hope you will clear out your afternoon schedule so you can try some of this.

**Craig:** I shouldn’t, but I will.

**John:** So, weirdly a cross between what we love about crossword puzzles and also what we love about Sudoku and only certain things can fit in certain boxes.

**Craig:** It actually sounds like a cross between what I love about crosswords and what I love about you.

**John:** Aw, Craig.

**Craig:** Aw.

**Aline:** Aw.

**John:** Aline knows that I’m blushing right now.

**Aline:** He’s blushing. Do you guys know what Sooth is?

**John:** Sooth is the relaxation app.

**Aline:** Sooth is a massage app.

**John:** Oh yes. Yes.

**Aline:** Sooth is an on-demand massage app. And I’ve got to say I’ve used it for a bunch of years now. It’s great.

**John:** We’ve used it.

**Aline:** And I’ve had many, many massage therapists. You can request the same one. But the beauty of Sooth is that you’re like, you know what in about an hour I’m in the mood for a massage and I have time. And they’ll come to your house and they bring the table. And I’ve had many, many Sooth massages and they’ve been different people and they’ve all been pretty great.

You know how sometimes you go to a spa and someone starts and you’re like this is – what am I doing?

**John:** There’s going to be 45 more minutes of this.

**Aline:** There’s going to be 45 minutes of nothingness. These are really good, strong massage therapists. I’ve only had women because I’ve had too many creepy male massages in my life. So I can only speak for the female massage therapists on Sooth. But they’re really good. They come to your house. And what’s nice about that is when you’re done, you know, and after they go you just get in your shower. You’re not in a spa. That’s a whole – I don’t like things that are a whole thing. Going to get a massage can be a whole thing.

But Sooth makes it into a really easy, pleasurable way to get a massage in your home.

**John:** Nice. That sounds like an ad for Sooth but it’s actually just a One Cool Thing. Craig, what’s your One Cool Thing?

**Craig:** Well I don’t know if I’ve mentioned Assassin’s Creed Odyssey yet.

**John:** No.

**Craig:** I’ve been playing it. So, hat’s off to Ubisoft. Every Assassin’s Creed game is kind of the same thing. I mean, it’s amazing. And yet it’s sort of like, well, you know, the Big Mac works for a reason. People like it. And in this game you’re running around Ancient Greece which is cool because you get to talk to Socrates. But what my One Cool Thing specifically about the game is sex. There is sex in Assassin’s Creed and it’s hysterical.

You know the old cliché of two people start kissing and then they just sort of pan over to a fireplace? So that’s what it is every single time. But the best part is you can play the game as a man or a woman. It’s kind of ingenious actually. There’s a beginning where there’s a brother and a sister and something terrible happens and they’re split apart. And then they have to kind of find each other over the course of time and they’re rivals. And so if you choose to play as a woman, well, you’re the sister. If you choose to play as a man you’re the brother. And then they just flop the other things. But what doesn’t change are all the people that are interested in having sex with you. And your choice is to have sex with them.

I have had sex with everyone. So I played this character, because you have an option. You can turn down people. I turn down no one.

**Aline:** Just the pulled quote from this episode is Craig Mazin for Deadline Hollywood. It’s going to be Craig Mazin, “I’ve had sex with everyone.”

**John:** Everyone.

**Craig:** My favorite thing happened the other night. For whatever reason I had sex with this woman that I used to have sex with that I hadn’t seen in a while. Then I go rescue this guy and he’s so into me right from the start, right? I’m playing as a guy. So he’s into me from the start. And then he has a brother. And he and the brother are very different. I’m like, OK, I kind of see what’s going on here. This brother is into guys, or if I’m playing as a woman he’ll be into women. It doesn’t matter. The point is he’s into me and the other one is not really. A sad story.

No. They both are. I have sex with brothers, not at the same time, but separately. And then they both find out.

**Aline:** Next quote. New article. New piece. “I had sex with brothers.”

**Craig:** I had sex with brothers. And then I dumped both of them. It was great.

**Aline:** Have you guys seen the Black Mirror with Anthony Mackey in it?

**John:** I have seen that one.

**Craig:** No.

**Aline:** You have?

**John:** Yeah.

**Aline:** Yeah!

**John:** It’s sort of that situation.

**Aline:** Yeah. Craig have you seen that one?

**Craig:** I’m living it, man. I don’t think you understand what I’m saying. I’m having sex with everyone.

**Aline:** Well, it can get tricky.

**Craig:** One of the quests in the game is you have to go get somebody’s like armor from a special blacksmith. And you go to the blacksmith and he’s like, well, and he’s like a big burly dude. He’s like, “I would, but you know, I don’t know. Maybe if you make it worth my while.” I mean, he’s literally saying, “You know, if you have sex with me I’ll do it.” And I’m like, done. In. And he’s like, “The only problem is I need special herbs to actually have an erection.” So I have to go and like kill some mountain lions or something so I can collect herbs to give it to a blacksmith to have sex with him in exchange for armor.

I mean, that’s a day. That’s a freaking day.

**Aline:** What’s going to happen when we find out this is not actually happening?

**Craig:** Yeah. There is no game called Assassin’s Creed Odyssey. [laughs]

**John:** Craig is just sitting there staring at a black screen. [laughs]

**Craig:** Or I’m doing it. First of all, I have to find a blacksmith. A real blacksmith.

**Aline:** Brothers.

**Craig:** Brothers. I have to find brothers. I have to find an old flame. I want to be clear. Every single, and I urge people when they’re playing Assassin’s Creed, whether you’re playing as a man or a woman, have sex with everyone. Because you end up kissing everyone and then like the camera just drifts away. And the best part is the next thing that happens is like time has passed and you’re alone. They’re gone. So you have sex with people and they just leave. It’s perfect. It’s a perfect world.

**Aline:** It’s perfect for our Tinder age.

**Craig:** It really is.

**Aline:** Tinder.

**Craig:** It’s like, hey, yeah, I’ll have sex with you for armor. And you’re gone.

**John:** That should be the title of the episode. [laughs]

**Aline:** I’ll have sex with you for armor and then you’re gone.

**Craig:** And then you’re gone. It’s fantastic.

**John:** Oh, that is our show for this week. Scriptnotes is produced by Megana Rao. It is edited by Matthew Chilelli. Our outro this week is by Victor Krause. If you have an outro you can send us a link to ask@johnaugust.com. That’s also the place where you can send longer questions like the ones we answered today. But for short questions on Twitter Craig is @clmazin. I am @johnaugust. Aline, do you want to be Twitter mentioned now?

**Aline:** Yeah.

**John:** Great. You are @?

**Aline:** I’m @alinebmckenna.

**Craig:** @alinebmckenna. You can find the show notes for this episode and all episodes at johnaugust.com. That’s also where you find the transcripts. We get them up the week after the episode airs.

You can find all the back episodes of the show at Scriptnotes.net. And you need to sign up there if you want to use the app to listen to back episodes. So some people were having a hard time listening to back episodes on the app. It’s because you have to go to Scriptnotes.net to log in there. The app exists for iOS and Android.

You can also download 50-episode seasons at store.johnaugust.com. Aline, you use the Scriptnotes app?

**Aline:** Oh yeah. I do. I do. I’m not a completist, but I’m pretty close to it. I’ve been an early fan and I was an early fan partly because when you’re a screenwriter you’re so lonely and the fact that there was a show where I could listen to two of my friends talking was so nice.

**Craig:** It was like you weren’t alone.

**Aline:** Yes. And it was like my buddies are over and we’re talking about screenwriting. But as you know I’m a legit fan and I recommend the show all the time. And so I did recently when I was writing a script I went back and I did kind of a deep dive into the early episodes.

**John:** Well, Aline, thank you for being a super fan and also for coming back again on the show.

**Craig:** Thank you, Aline.

**John:** To be our buddy and talk through these issues with us.

**Aline:** I just looked it up and Batgirl and Catwoman, they were both on Adam West, but I can’t remember – and fans will tell us which one used to appear in the credits.

**Craig:** And Eartha Kitt was Catwoman right?

**Aline:** Julie Newmar did the first two years, and then Eartha Kitt.

**Craig:** See, I’m an Eartha Kitt fan because she would [purrs]. She was great. She really leaned into the purr.

**Aline:** She was the greatest.

**John:** Yeah. And she would have sex for armor.

**Craig:** I mean, honestly I think you would, too.

**Aline:** I’m getting Craig a t-shirt that says Will Have Sex for Armor.

**Craig:** Yeah. Don’t say it like it’s bad. It’s good.

**John:** Craig, thanks so much. Have a great week.

**Craig:** Thanks guys, bye.

**Aline:** Bye.

Scriptnotes Ep 418: The One with David Koepp, Transcript

September 26, 2019 Scriptnotes Transcript

The original post for this episode can be found [here](https://johnaugust.com/2019/the-one-with-david-koepp).

**Craig Mazin:** Hi friends. Today’s podcast contains some salty language, so if you are in the car with the young ones put their earmuffs on or wait to listen to it later.

**John August:** Hello and welcome. My name is John August.

**Craig:** My name is Craig Mazin.

**John:** And this is Episode 418 of Scriptnotes, a podcast about screenwriting and things that are interesting to screenwriters.

Today on the program we are joined by legendary screenwriter David Koepp whose credits include Jurassic Park, Death Becomes Her, Carlito’s Way, Mission: Impossible, Spider-Man, and Panic Room. His seventh movie as director, You Should Have Left, comes out next year. But his first novel, the bio-thriller Cold Storage, has just come out to rave reviews.

Welcome to the program David Koepp.

**David Koepp:** Thank you. Nice to be here, guys.

**Craig:** I have not heard of any of those movies. I’ve got to be honest. Can you say them again? Because I don’t recognize any of them.

**David:** I should mention I also wrote Guns of Navarone.

**Craig:** No. [laughs] Also drawing a blank.

**David:** That was 1958. No, but you know.

**Craig:** When you were a mere 30.

**David:** I was negative five.

**Craig:** I don’t know about you John, but of the many David Koepp films that you just mentioned that I love, it was Death Becomes Her that made me an early Koepp fan. What a surprising movie. I just had no idea what I was in for. And then it was just this wonderfully wicked dark thing. No one would ever make it today.

**David:** No.

**Craig:** In a million years. But it was so literate and smart.

**David:** Universal was kind of regretful while they were making it.

**Craig:** Oh wow.

**David:** I remember, OK, are anecdotes allowed–

**John:** Absolutely. This is an anecdotes show.

**Craig:** Mother’s milk on this show.

**David:** I wrote it with Martin Donovan who I did my first movie, Apartment Zero, with. And we wrote this script which we assumed would be another weird dark indie sort of comedy-ish.

**Craig:** Ish.

**David:** You know. But I sold this to Universal and Casey Silver who was very supportive at the time, he sent it around. And he called me one day and he said, “Bob Zemeckis wants to direct Death Becomes Her.” And he said it with such resignation.

**Craig:** Like we have to make this movie now? [laughs] Yeah, by the way, nothing has changed at Universal. That’s kind of their, “Ah, darn it, we have to make a movie.”

**David:** You know, he was just off like all three Back to the Futures and they wanted something big and great and hugely profitable.

**Craig:** You said I’ll show you.

**David:** And he said, no, I’m going to do this weird one. And I’m still going to throw her down the stairs.

**John:** Totally challenging.

**Craig:** But what a cast. I mean, you still got this great cast.

**David:** It came together beautifully and it was big and weird and stuck around. There’s a drag show of it that pops up in different cities from time to time and I tried to go in London and I couldn’t make it. Anyway, I would love to see it sometime.

**Craig:** We should go together.

**John:** We should.

**David:** Absolutely.

**John:** Well today while we have you on the show I would love to talk about adaptations, embargoes, books, the modern blockbuster, which I think you had an outsized role in helping to shape. But we also have some listener questions which are just for you because I tweeted out that you were going to be on the show. And so people wrote in with specific questions for you to answer on this podcast.

**David:** Great. Can I set that I always like – when I listen to a podcast I like to have a visual of what’s going on. So just in terms of what we’re wearing.

**John:** Absolutely.

**David:** I’m in a lightweight, dark blue, worsted, you know, suitable to the environment, but mindful of the calendar.

**Craig:** Sure.

**David:** John is in a t-shirt. Looks like it says, “It’s wine o’clock somewhere.” Craig is shirtless, which is cool.

**Craig:** And also worsted.

**John:** Craig is wearing an ascot. I think it’s important that people get the full visual.

**David:** Obviously that was a bit of material I worked on. Now everything else will be spontaneous.

**Craig:** No, this is nice. And we’re on the beach. Let’s go.

**John:** So I would love to start with the thing that I mentioned your name most in relation to is when people talk about adaptations and they talk about how difficult it is to take all the information that is in a book and put it in a visual form so that that author who could just directly tell you a bunch of a stuff as a screenwriter you have to find a way to show a bunch of stuff. And I always single out a moment in the first Jurassic Park where the audience and the people who just arrived on the island have to understand what it is that’s being done on the island and sort of how DNA processing works.

So I imagine in Michael Crichton’s book, which I read a zillion years ago, it’s probably 20 pages worth of material, going back all through this. In the film that you wrote it is an animated sequence which they are watching in a little exploratory–

**Craig:** In a theme park style goofy tone.

**John:** And so we’re watching the actors watch this little thing. Can I play a clip of what – this scene?

**David:** Please.

**Craig:** Think he’ll get money for this.

[Clip plays]

**David:** Kind of sounded like they’re taking a dump there in that last part. That’s a long time that it can directly download exposition into the audience’s head.

**Craig:** Today they would say to you, “OK that’s great. Now do it in one-third as much time, or maybe a quarter of as much time.” I feel like they wouldn’t let you go on that long today.

**David:** No. It would be problematic. It was a real gift that it was a theme park. And so we were wrestling all this exposition stuff to the ground and how do you have five or six scientists standing around talking to each other for so long and make it interesting. And we had two great advantages. One was Jeff Goldblum who is so charming and has such offbeat line readings that, you know, he can read stereo instructions and they sound witty and unusual. And the other was that it was a theme park. So I would love to say Mr. DNA was entirely my idea but it wasn’t. Steven said, “They’re in a theme park. Can’t there be a little movie?”

And one of us said, well, what’s there supposed to be like an animated guy, like Mr. DNA?

**Craig:** Yes!

**John:** Exactly that.

**David:** Mr. DNA.

**Craig:** Yes!

**David:** So it was kind of lifted from, I don’t know if you saw this in your seventh grade health class in middle school, but Hemo the Magnificent was about your blood. And it was a live action movie but it had an animated character in it, Hemo, and he would tell you all about blood. And I remember he had an accent for some reason.

**Craig:** They always would.

**David:** Because you have to throw in a little fun. It’s animation.

**Craig:** I’m in your body.

**David:** So they were there and they were getting the tour, well then you can have the little movie on the tour. And the idea of going into full frame animation in the middle of this great big summer movie kind of tickled us and was really fun. So we had these built in advantages in a great performer in a flexible premise that let us get away with a lot of that.

**John:** Well what was so clever about it is that usually the problem you run into is that there’s information that you need the audience to understand but some of the characters in that scene would already know the information. So the Sam Neil character would already have that information, so it does not make any sense to tell it to him. But the fact that it’s already a pre-filmed piece of animation.

**David:** And the scientists are beyond it. They want to go – they keep saying, OK, OK, they’re trying to get out of the little ride thing so they can go to where it’s more interesting. Because we know this and this is for nine year olds. But we’re like, yeah, but we want to sell tickets to nine year olds.

**Craig:** Yeah. I mean, I would argue that the real gift you had may have been more that there were kids there. Because somebody needs to explain this to kids. And when it comes to science the audience is probably not that far off from kids in the sense of well a lot of people don’t know what DNA is or how it functions. And they certainly don’t understand how you brought dinosaurs back to life. But if you have two kids, whether it’s a theme park movie or just somebody sitting down and going, OK, let me just draw in the sand with a stick.

Characters that don’t know things are the most beneficial for writers who need the audience to know things. Otherwise you end up with the terrible, “As you know…”

**David:** Exactly. How long have we been brothers? It’s why journalists and detectives are so great. Because they fundamentally have to find something out. So, asking questions doesn’t seem like it’s morally safer. You know, it seems like they’re working toward a discernible goal.

**John:** What happens at the end of this clip is that we do see Sam Neil and Goldblum and everyone are trying to push to get beyond just the information that was in this little thing. And that’s the other crucial thing about an information dump is like if there’s no conflict, if there’s no drive, if the characters don’t want anything in it it’s going to feel flat. So, we get to see the characters respond to that information by trying to push past. You’re still keeping the scene alive even as this information is coming at us.

**David:** Yes. Also the animation format let us jump to the really apropos visuals. We didn’t see it, we just heard the audio, but when they’re explaining how the mosquito is trapped in amber there’s one really great visual of a mosquito on a branch and amber oozing over it and the mosquito getting trapped. And you really understand in that image, because images always express it so much better than words.

**John:** So talk us through the process of adapting Jurassic Park into the screenplay. At what point did it come to you and at what point did you have to figure out these are the beats of the movie. This is how the movie wants to tell itself. What was the process for you in getting the book and then being able to report back like this is how I can make the movie version of this?

**David:** So I was at Universal and they still used to do overall deals then. So they had been through a couple writers on Jurassic Park and it wasn’t – it was really hard to work out so it wasn’t quite coming together. And they were a little bit running out of time which is always the best time to enter a project if you can.

**Craig:** Right.

**David:** If you can work it that way.

**Craig:** There’s only so much disagreement they can do.

**David:** Yeah. And so Casey Silver actually suggested me to Steven and said, “Try this guy, he’s on the payroll so he’s super cheap and seems like he’s relatively fast. Why don’t you see what you can get?” So I read it and I thought, wow, this is really difficult. But I had an approach, so I went and met Steven and told him this is what I think. And he said, “Great. Do that.” And so with really very little guidance up front. I mean, a few general – and to this day he’ll give you some general stuff, but he really wants to see what you do. And you go try. I know what I think. Avoid this, avoid that. I’d love to see this. And in that case he had a couple sequences where he said – the T-rex attack on the road basically was already storyboarded and he said, “I don’t know who the people are, but this is what happens in the sequence. See if you can figure it out.”

And so there was, again, built in advantages. But it was winnowing the characters and who needed to be combined. How does the tone of the book, which is pretty dark and not necessarily going to sustain in – it’s not that it was, well, we want a wider audience than that. It was Steven’s viewpoint is more uplifting than that. So if you give him something that’s, you know, this is the guy who found the uplifting tale about the Holocaust. It’s just his world view. So to try to find a lighter tone, preserve a few characters who used to die, and find a different approach for Hammond and stuff like that.

So I just kind of came in and told them what I thought. And then I went and did an outline. And it just kind of went well.

**Craig:** This is something that you probably thought had a good chance of going well. It’s Steven Spielberg. It’s a bestselling novel.

**David:** Well you didn’t. That was the thing. Because it was ’92 when we made the movie. So it was the dawn of CG.

**Craig:** Right.

**David:** So really the last reference of dinosaurs was still Ray Harryhausen, which is referred to in the movie with the “when dinosaurs ruled the earth” banner that floats down. So everything – stop motion was the last time we’d seen dinosaurs on film I think.

**Craig:** Or Guys in Suits.

**David:** The remake of King Kong didn’t do them. Yeah. So the notion that they were going to be realistic was just a leap of faith. And they could have been laughable. And I remember the test – there was going to be a lot more robotic dinosaurs initially. Stan Winston, you know, there’s a ton of robotic stuff in it. Stan Winston did great work but basically if you see them from the head up it’s robotry and if you see their legs it’s CG.

But I remember the day it all changed was this test came back from ILM that was a velociraptor running in place. And it was just the skeleton. There was no musculature, no skin or anything. And we were in the Amblin screening room and watched this test and it was so cool. And the movement was so smooth and not herky-jerky at all that everybody thought, “Oh, this might work. This actually might work.”

**Craig:** That’s so interesting. So your frame of reference was stop motion which is characterized by its herky-jerkiness because there’s only so many, I mean, you are moving it physically so you can’t make a thousand movements a second. You can make 24 movements a second, which turns out to be pretty herky-jerky, or even fewer.

So it was simply the smoothness of the motion. Before you see textures. Before you see anything. That’s what got you?

**David:** Yeah. It was.

**Craig:** Fascinating.

**David:** And also the only other big CG movie there had been, I may be wrong, but it seems was Terminator 2. But that used really fluid and inhuman stuff.

**Craig:** Right. It was shiny liquid metal.

**David:** Right. Which is totally cool, but it wasn’t like trying to create an animal. And dinosaurs were supposed to be real animals, not monsters. There was always a thing, you’d get fined on the set if you’d call them a monster. They’re animals. They’re not monsters.

Yeah, so it was very much a gamble.

**Craig:** And then on the other side of it coming out, now you’ve got this enormous blockbuster under your belt, a true blockbuster. When it’s time for you to write your next one do you now – I’m just always curious about how success impacts us as writers. Do things change? Do you now feel like, OK, I’m aiming for something now? Or do you just ignore all of it and do your job?

**David:** It’s really hard to – I feel like I stayed a very decent human being.

**Craig:** Oh, you are. I don’t mean according to me. I’m not a great judge of character.

**David:** And I think I’ve done good writing on and off. But it’s very hard. I was 29 when it came out, or just turning 30. And it became the biggest movie of all time. There’s no way that doesn’t just fuck you up. If only in that – can you ever be satisfied again? You know? And I really feel like it took me till my early 50s – I’m 56 now – to where I felt like I’m going to stop feeling like, gosh, you know, sure would be great to have another one of those someday. And I’m going to feel like, well, there will never be another one of those but I’m grateful that I had it. What an extraordinary experience. How lucky am I?

**Craig:** Right.

**David:** I feel like it took a very long time. And I did have, you know, I wrote a lot of bigger movies, but a lot of that – a lot of it is because I love those movies. And I had a great time writing them. Usually. Sometimes had a horrific time writing them. But those are the movies that I wanted to go see. And that was always my litmus test was would I want to pay, you know, whatever a ticket costs at the time to sit down and see this movie. Would it make me happy to sneak in a burrito at lunch time and watch this movie?

And I feel like I obeyed that all the time. And with varying degrees of success. Sometimes even if you say that you’re kind of doing it because it feels like well that would be a hit and wouldn’t it be fun to have a hit. But I don’t know, your sincerity gets sniffed out pretty quickly I think by the gods.

**John:** Well going from a giant blockbuster adaptation to this next movie you’re going to – the movie you directed, I Think You Should Leave, is based on an incredibly slender German novel.

**David:** It’s actually You Should Have Left.

**John:** You Should Have Left.

**David:** It’s much more conclusive. It’s not an expression of opinion.

**Craig:** That sounds even shorter. That’s so German. You should have left.

**David:** Really.

**John:** I’m confusing it with there’s a Netflix show I Think You Should Leave. And You Should Have Left.

**David:** This is after. And I’ve seen that show. It should leave.

**John:** Yes. So it’s a tiny paranoid, it’s almost more like a Panic Room situation where it’s a metaphysical kind of haunted house, you know, Borgesian sort of stuck in a place. What draws you to that kind of adaptation after doing these giant, you know, Da Vinci Code kind of adaptations?

**David:** Well, I’ve always tried – I like all different kinds of movies, so I’ve really tried to mix it up. And I also, you know how it is. If you’re lucky enough to have a success in any area that’s what Hollywood would like you very much to replicate.

**Craig:** Is that so? [laughs]

**David:** There’s a lot of unanswered questions from Chernobyl. I really think you could go back to them. I do. There’s at least 10 more episodes in that. What happened between the episodes? There’s 10 more shows in there, easy.

**Craig:** Oh, between. Everybody just sleeps. Of course. They just sleep. They don’t move. They just sleep.

**David:** But I, you know, try to throw them off the scent a little bit. Try to keep it fresh for yourself and do things that are interesting and different. I’ve always felt like in my original stuff, and I’ve tried to split my time about 50/50. And I have. It’s just the originals get made less often.

In my original stuff I’m drawn to slightly darker, certainly paranoid kind of things. And it also helped as a writer when it’s not an adaptation by having a very well defined bottle. You know, in Panic Room it was I never wanted to leave the house. And I almost succeeded. There’s a few minutes at the beginning and a scene at the end where they’re outside the house. The Paper is a movie I wrote about journalism with my brother and it was 24 hours. It was exactly what was then the news cycle, from 7am to 7am. And within that structure, once I have the box I feel like now I can decide what goes in it. And I feel actually freed by the constraint. Because when you can just pick from anything—

**Craig:** It’s overwhelming.

**David:** Exactly. It’s too difficult. Even Lawrence of Arabia had containment. It was a period of this guy’s life.

So, I feel like I forgot the question.

**John:** Well going back to You Should Have Left, it has a tremendous amount of constraint because essentially you get to a house and you’re at that house. It’s almost a Blumhouse kind of model where it’s a very–

**David:** It is a Blumhouse.

**John:** Oh, it’s literally the Blumhouse model.

**David:** As a matter of fact, yeah.

**Craig:** It is the Blumhouse model. Because it’s Blumhouse.

**David:** It’s a model for Blumhouse.

**Craig:** Well that’s new for them.

**David:** But even before they were involved I thought these are going to be the guys for this. That one I really wanted to do, heavily mixed feelings about directing, because it can be great fun and incredibly satisfying when you get something the way you want it. And whether it’s successful or not, it’s the way you want it. But it takes over your life and ruins it.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**David:** Just physically, emotionally, socially, domestically awful.

**John:** It’s been 10 years between my last directing thing largely because of that thing. I just couldn’t, you know, I had a young kid. I just couldn’t go off and do it.

**Craig:** I’m not. I don’t see any reason to direct. There’s all these wonderful directors out there.

**David:** It’s dog’s work. It really is.

**Craig:** That’s what John Lee Hancock calls it. Dog’s work.

**David:** I think I got it from him via Scott Frank.

**Craig:** Yeah, that’s probably right. It’s dog’s work. But you keep doing the dog’s work.

**David:** Yeah, isn’t that weird? I know.

**Craig:** You’re into it.

**David:** You should talk to my wife about that.

**Craig:** I will.

**David:** No, she’s articulate on the subject. But also resigned. She’s like, “No, I don’t think you should do it. I think it makes you unhappy. We’re fine. We’ll cope. We’ll miss you. But you’re miserable. But good luck, sweetie. I hope it goes well.”

But yeah, You Should Have Left, there were a couple things. Kevin Bacon is a great actor and I saw a potential for something really special for him to do. And he’s done a spectacular job with it. I wanted to do – I like a bottle. And I wanted to do this little family in this weird place and strange things happen to them. He’s not a writer. In the book he was a writer, but I don’t think the world needs anymore movies about writers.

**John:** He’s literally a screenwriter in the book.

**Craig:** Oh, that’s terrible.

**David:** That was the first thing we changed.

**Craig:** That’s awful.

**David:** Nobody wants to see a movie about us.

**Craig:** Nobody.

**David:** Unless you guys are writing one, in which case.

**Craig:** If we are we should stop.

**David:** I implore you to stop. And the last movie I directed before that was this kind of catastrophe in every way, shape, and form.

**Craig:** Which I liked.

**David:** And I couldn’t leave it like that. There are many likeable things in it and I thank you for that.

**Craig:** No problem. It’s really funny.

**David:** There are bits that are funny. But it’s inarguable that critically, commercially, and personally—

**Craig:** Oh yeah. Absolute disaster.

**David:** It was horrible. [laughs]

**John:** This was Mortdecai.

**David:** But I didn’t want to leave it at that. I felt like well I don’t want to ever direct again, but I certainly don’t want to leave it at that.

**Craig:** I can’t go out that way.

**David:** Yeah, right.

**Craig:** So you’re literally making a movie just to say—

**David:** No, because I liked the subject matter a lot and I love Kevin and I felt like he could do something special.

**Craig:** Good. And?

**David:** And I could cleanse the palate in what’s worse the hard way. Just one more man. Just one more. Just one more.

**Craig:** I have, well you know what I like about you?

**David:** Hmm?

**Craig:** So much. And, you know, full disclosure we’ve been friends for a while, so this is genuine. But aside from being a terrific writer who has this remarkable track record and really does deserve what John said at the beginning. You are one of our legends. You take huge swings. It’s not like you’ve sat on your laurels. You’re not one of those guys who said, “OK, well you know what? I’m going to make these two huge movies and now I’ll just show up every six years to sprinkle my magic fairy dust on something that was already going to be beloved anyway.” You take big swings. You’re always risking things to get out there. And whether it works or it doesn’t work commercially or critically or any of that stuff, I think that’s wonderful.

I think there are so many people who are so petrified of violating whatever it is, their own brand. I mean, when people say the word brand I lose my shit. Because it’s essentially the antithesis of what we’re supposed to be doing as writers or artists which is being genuine. And that should mean taking swings. So I just think that’s wonderful that you do it and that you’re still doing it.

**David:** I’m trying. You know, I admire Steven Soderbergh’s career a lot. And he’s a great guy. You know, he really takes a cut at stuff. Sometimes, you know, he hits that one. And other times you’re like, whoa.

**Craig:** That’s what a big swing is.

**David:** Exactly.

**Craig:** I mean, when you swing hard and you fall down everyone laughs.

**David:** I was a bit surprised as long as we brought up the M word, this movie I directed recently, I was a bit surprised not that it got bad reviews, because certainly by the time it comes to reviews you’ve shown it to enough audiences and enough people and you’re getting a sense that the reaction is less than enthusiastic.

**Craig:** You’ve caught trouble in the air.

**David:** But the anger does surprise you. Because I felt we didn’t hurt anyone. And it was by no means a safe choice. We were trying to make like a 1966 comedy like Terry Thomas would have made.

**Craig:** I’m so with you.

**David:** That’s gutsy.

**Craig:** I thought people just – at least, look, people, I can’t blame people for liking or not liking things. But I thought at least critically this pile on and this kind of orgy of delightful hatred completely missed the point of what you’re just saying, which is, you know, they will say, “Oh, well here comes another super hero movie, blah, blah, blah.” Well, OK, here’s someone taking a shot. If you think it doesn’t work, explain it. But you’re right. When was the last time a movie studio released a Terry Thomas style comedy which is sort of in and of its time, but out of its own time. And there’s slapstick. And the most bizarre stuff. And an entire plot line about a mustache. It’s just wonderful. I thought, I don’t know, listen, a lot of people think that my taste in movies is terrible because of so many of them that I’ve written.

I don’t care.

**David:** It’s also a thing about comedy, though. If a horror movie doesn’t work out they’ll say, well, that wasn’t that scary. If a drama doesn’t work out they’ll say, well—

**John:** They didn’t care.

**David:** Yeah, I didn’t like the guy.

**Craig:** “Didn’t love it,” is what they say.

**David:** Yeah, I didn’t love it.

**Craig:** I didn’t love it.

**John:** I won’t say that anymore.

**David:** Comedy comes out they say, “That was horrible. That was a terrible set.”

**Craig:** How dare they?

**David:** Exactly. Those assholes. You’ve really angered people.

**Craig:** Yeah, no, comedy is the hardest. It’s the most punishing. And even in great success people are like, oh, yeah, that was funny. You know what I mean? They don’t give you the Oscar. It’s, yeah. Yeah. Well, see. I’m grouching.

**John:** Talking about swings and doing different stuff, this is your first book.

**David:** This is really fun. I can write about stuff that will never see the screen. I can write what someone is thinking or feeling, which as you know there’s no way to access it other than their faces or their dialogue. And I just started having a lot of fun. So within about three pages I thought, OK, it’s a – then I began the lying the process. I said – because I didn’t want to face how much work it would be to write a book. And so I said, well, it’s probably a short story. And so by page 25 I was like it’s not a short story. It’s a novella. Yeah.

So I got to page 100 and my friend John Kamps said, “You must admit it’s a book.” Because I could digress. I could go into three – when I was in high school I worked at a McDonald’s for a couple of years. So there’s a character in the book, he’s not even one of the main characters, and he’s the manager of this storage place. And he’s a jerk. And I got to go three pages into where he used to work before he came to the storage place and talk about life working at McDonald’s, which I thought was fascinating. And it was to me anyway.

And, no, the book is not 600 pages. I mean, 30 years of screenwriting impulses came to bear. Exactly. But especially because the book was going to have a lot of science I had this incredible freedom to explore and expound and I like to learn stuff that I didn’t know before. And I like science that is somewhat accessible and compellingly told. When you come across somebody like Brian Greene or somebody like that who is just a really good science explainer. They’re fascinating. They’re like the teachers whose classes you loved the most. You know, there’s a reason like Carl Sagan and Neil deGrasse Tyson and the really good explainers are popular.

**Craig:** Yes.

**David:** So I wanted to be able to – also I think science can be very funny because the natural world is really brutal. It’s just mean and nasty.

**John:** It doesn’t care about you.

**Craig:** No, no, good lord no.

**David:** No.

**John:** So, as you’re writing this as a novel, you’ve accepted that you’re writing this as a novel, some part of your brain must also be thinking like, Ok, well this could also be a movie. I mean, it’s a movie style premise. And so how are you balancing the David Koepp novelist versus David Koepp screenwriter who is going to have to adapt this? Did you try to balance that all in your head?

**David:** It’s hard. You and I talked about it a little bit from your books and your experiences with it. And you really have to actively squelch that part. Because the screenwriter part of you, the first thing I do when I’m adapting a book is I do scene cards for the whole book and I lay the structure out and look at it on a table and figure out how that happened. And then I start just – obviously we’re not going to have the scene where they go visit her daughter. That’s useless. And chuck out a bunch of stuff.

But the scene where they go visit her daughter may be the whole reason somebody wrote that book. It just doesn’t fit in a movie. So, I really tried to tell the screenwriter part of myself to shut up because they wouldn’t let me do the three pages on McDonald’s. And it’s not in the screenplay, which it’s a first draft of.

**Craig:** Oh, so you are doing the screenplay of this?

**David:** I did, yes.

**Craig:** Oh, you already did?

**David:** Or I am. It depends who you ask. I feel I’m nearly done.

**Craig:** Oh, and they do not?

**David:** We’ll see. Opinions vary.

**John:** So it’s a fascinating that a person with 30 credits and a giant career still gets that sense from a studio of like, oh no, this isn’t really the draft.

**Craig:** Not just 30 credits.

**John:** 30 giant.

**Craig:** Let’s just list some of them again. By the way, that’s the studio that is being held aloft by Mission: Impossible which was started by David Koepp. And they’re sort of like, “Uh, we don’t know if you’re done yet.” I kind of love that.

**David:** Everybody’s got thoughts, you know.

**Craig:** Everybody’s got thoughts.

**David:** That’s the thing, though. In a book–

**Craig:** No one has thoughts.

**David:** They don’t have their thoughts.

**John:** No, absolutely.

**David:** And your editor, Zach Wagman who is the editor of this, I was just stunned – it was the first time in 30 years someone had spoken to me about the writing as if they viewed it as essentially mine instead of essentially theirs.

**Craig:** It’s a lovely thing. That is a lovely thing.

**John:** So let’s talk about that. So we physically have a copy here sitting on the table, and what is so different about writing a book versus writing a screenplay is that this book is finished. Like you cannot go back and change stuff in it. It is actually done and the Cold Storage that you intended to write is that book. And it is just done and finished. In a way is it liberating now that you’re going to the screenplay knowing that you can make different choices and it doesn’t go back and change the original document?

Because so often when I’m approached to do an adaptation I’ll talk with the author and I’ll sit down with them and say like, “Listen, you wrote a fantastic book. I will not change anything in your book. But I will change some things in the movie because it’s a movie and just works under different things.” In some ways—

**David:** Some of them will appreciate that, and some of them—

**John:** And I’ve had both situations. And some really rough situations.

**David:** Have you ever forged a working relationship with the author of a book?

**John:** Yes. Daniel Wallace who wrote Big Fish. I sat down with him and he had never read a screenplay before until I showed him the screenplay for Big Fish. We talked about sort of all the stuff that’s sort of off stage in the book that he wrote. And he loved it. He became a screenwriter. And he’s still an active part of every version of Big Fish. And he’s in the movie Big Fish. So he’s deeply involved in it.

But something like Jurassic Park, were you talking with Crichton about stuff?

**David:** No. Almost always everything goes through the director and it’s better that way. The only time I ever really needed the author of the book and he was great was Edwin Torres who wrote the books that Carlito’s Way was based on. And I needed him because I could adapt the books but it was Spanish Harlem in the mid ‘70s. Not my background. It was his life story. Everybody in that book is somebody he knew. And I just – I needed to be able to talk to him. And he was great and loquacious. It helped that he wasn’t only a novelist. He was a New York State Supreme Court judge. So he viewed novel writing as novel. And he viewed a movie from one of his books as just like the greatest party of all time. So he was excited about it.

**Craig:** He had a day job so—

**David:** Yeah. He’d go to court. I ran into him in New York the other day. And he was colorful when I – this was 25 years ago and he was probably in his mid-50s. So now he’s probably closer to 80 and he’s just let his colorful flag fly.

**Craig:** I love it.

**David:** I said, “Judge Torres is that you?” He said, “You bet it is.”

**Craig:** What a cool guy.

**John:** Now, David, you brought up Carlito’s Way and I think that was the first screenplay of yours I ever read. So I was working as an intern at Universal when you guys were making Carlito’s Way. So I got to read the script for Carlito’s Way.

**David:** On paper probably.

**John:** On paper. With brads in it. The whole thing.

**Craig:** And the words Carlito’s Way written in Sharpie on the outside.

**John:** Yes. That whole process that young people will never understand. How you had to slam the script on the edge, and hold it down. You brought in the Sharpie so you could stack them or put them on the shelf.

**Craig:** Stack them in the shelf.

**John:** I remember reading that and as opposed to the James Cameron scripts I was reading at the same time, you wrote a really dense page. There was a lot happening. Those were dense pages. Over your long career have you seen the form of screenwriting change at all or at least the form of screenplays change at all? I feel like we are much lighter and airier now than when I started. I’m wondering if you’ve noticed any differences over the years.

**David:** Yeah. I try not to be as dense as that. Sometimes, I don’t often have a reason to go back and look at my old stuff, but like if I’m moving boxes around or something I’ll say, oh yeah, look at that. And I open it and then I think, wow, I used way fewer double dashes and spaces and I wrote whole sentences. This is pretty good. I had a decent attention span back then.

I don’t know if maybe it’s fatuous that all of our attention spans have changed and we want to assimilate information faster. But also that particular story was – it was ruminative. Because it was a guy’s memory in the last minute or two before he dies. I’ve ruined the ending.

**Craig:** He dies.

**David:** Yeah. So, it kind of seemed to suit it. And I had a wealth of literary material to draw on. But, yeah, I think things are a little more spare than they used to be. I think there’s no excuse though for not having good sentences. You know, even if they’re terse and Hemingway-esque sentences. Ideally they would be that. But you can’t write a semi-literate screenplay. You can’t use sentence fragments. You can’t – I feel – you can’t say, “He comes in the room. Sits. Looks around. Something’s not right.” Something’s not right is not bad because it has a noun and a verb.

**Craig:** Something’s not right has a, yeah, there is a certain kind of – you can trip over into a sort of laziness. But also a kind of lack of intention. I mean, John and I talk about this all the time. If you’re going to write things in sort of a short staccato then maybe it’s because the character is a short and staccato kind of person, or the situation is one that it requires fast thinking.

**David:** Or ideally you could vary your rhythms.

**John:** Of course.

**Craig:** That would be nice.

**David:** There are fuller paragraphs when the movie slows down a little bit.

**Craig:** Sounds like you’re thinking about things is what you’re doing and you’re being a writer. And I don’t know. If I were teaching a class on screenwriting at Stark for instance I would want to teach a class just on the stuff that isn’t dialogue. Because I actually think so much can happen there. So much more than people understand. And for fucking fear of “don’t direct on the page” everyone it seems like there is a generation of screenwriters that have abdicated responsibility.

**David:** Yeah. I hate that. The thing that drives me the craziest is when someone comes out and says, “There’s a spirited chase,” or a big set piece to go here. I’m like who is going to design it? This is your shot.

**Craig:** It’s also your job.

**David:** And you know what? Even if they throw the whole thing out and do their own, it’s still your job.

**Craig:** It’s still your job.

**David:** If it’s a four-minute chase you better cover about four pages to give us simulation of the rhythm of the thing.

**Craig:** Correct. And something surely is happening in this chase that’s relevant to character or–

**John:** And if there’s not then there really is a fundamental problem.

**Craig:** Then it’s just a fucking chase.

**David:** These fucking people.

**Craig:** I mean, you know what, let’s be as old as cranky as we can possibly be. Let’s go maximum crank.

**David:** But you also – you can direct on the page. You just can’t use the word “camera.”

**Craig:** You don’t have to. [laughs]

**David:** Or anything like that. I hate to keep referring to the early ‘90s, but I don’t know, it was a nice period. One of the early lessons I learned about writing for a director was Zemeckis in Death Becomes Her said, there’s a moment Meryl Streep’s character is teetering at the top of the stars. And then he pushes her down with like a finger. And when we wrote the script I put, “For a moment she just hangs there like Wile E. Coyote off the edge of the cliff.” And he said that told me more about the style of the movie than anything. Because it was sort of heightened Chuck Jones reality.

**Craig:** Exactly. Exactly. Tone.

**David:** It’s only a few words. It doesn’t take forever. And it doesn’t refer to any specific shot. It refers to a feeling.

**Craig:** Direction. Ugh.

**John:** The sense of what’s supposed to be there. We’ve got some questions that are specific to you, so can we ask you some questions?

**David:** Please.

**John:** All right.

**Craig:** Why are you such a legend? [laughs]

**John:** I would love to know how David’s approach to action sequences has changed across films like Mission: Impossible, Spider-Man, and Indy.

**David:** I don’t think it really has changed that much. I think you have to fully imagine the sequence. I mean, all those are different situations. So, it depends on the director. Like Mission: Impossible I worked out those set pieces De Palma specifically beforehand. The last Indiana Jones movie it depends. Sometimes Steven would tell me something or we’d work it out together. Other times he’d say, “Well take a crack at it.” And I’d take a crack at it first.
I think that – as we were just saying – it’s always a writer’s responsibility to do it first.
I would beware of dense paragraphs in an action sequence because you’re supposed to have a sense that the movie is moving faster. Because it has to be a reading experience first let the eye move quickly across the page. But I think I’ve preserved the same approach to action sequences, or suspense, which is that you have to take them really seriously and allow yourself – there’s a big set piece in the middle of the movie, say, OK, well that’s three day’s work. Take it seriously and don’t just dash it off. And certainly don’t abdicate. You know, make it as exciting as you would want it to be in the movie.

**John:** I always describe action sequences as being the musical numbers in an action. So it’s like you may have stopped the characters talking but you’ve moved into a higher register. And you’re communicating this thing, but it’s still just as important as all the dialogue that happened before it. So it has to feel like there’s a reason why we’re doing this big production number here. And we’re going to come out of it with a new place, with characters having gotten someplace new. And otherwise it’s just a bunch of–

**Craig:** It’s just stuff.

**John:** It’s just stuff.

**Craig:** Which is probably why some writers abdicate because if you think about your analogy, when people sing in a movie musical perhaps the writer is concerned that they don’t know what’s supposed to happen other than the singing. And similarly if there’s a chase, like what’s supposed to happen other than [makes car noises].

But environment becomes an enormous thing. How you’re interacting with the environment. What choices can you be making on screen that are not specifically about turning the wheel to the left or the right? What’s changing so that you’re not just driving or just singing?

It’s hard work. Those are the hardest things to write. I mean, well, they’re really arduous to write I find. You know, because there’s so many more decisions that are happening per page in those sequences then a conversation which maybe there are a lot of decisions but they come a bit – I’m a bit more – I find those more accessible.

**David:** I actually find in – because my outline will be 3×5 cards on the coffee table. And there may only be one card for the sequence. But then when I get to the sequence I get out a legal pad and I just put down all my ideas for the sequence with dashes. And that’ll be three or four pages. Then I go back through and number them because the order may be very different from – you know, you have moments in your mind that you think belong there.

And you know generally at the beginning they’re breaking into the bank and at the end they’re driving away in the car. But in between that are all your action-y moments.

The other thing to consider is consider carefully can you cut that sequence and the story still tells? Because you have a big problem if so.

**John:** Absolutely.

**Craig:** Totally.

**David:** And it’s the same with a song I would imagine. If you can cut it completely – I was watching them film a little West Side Story the other day and they were doing America, which is so beautiful and cool and fantastic. But what I hadn’t noticed but saw this time is it plays like an argument or fight scene. They have very different–

**Craig:** It’s a debate.

**David:** Yeah, it’s a debate.

**Craig:** This place sucks. No, this place is great.

**David:** The story can’t be told without it. And those characters can’t be fully understand without it.

**Craig:** It’s illuminating who they are, what their point of view is, where they come from. All that is necessary.

**John:** One of the reasons why action sequences can be so exhausting to write, and so challenging to write for screenwriters, is that there’s a tremendous amount of crosscutting. You’re generally going between multiple points of view. And so making that look efficient on the page is really tough. So, things that could be like 60 cuts in the actual cut film, you can’t be jumping back and forth so much. So you need to get the sense that you are seeing all these different points of view without–

**Craig:** That’s a great point.

**David:** And you also have to have those great little bridging phrases like, “Back with Craig. Things haven’t gotten any better.”

**Craig:** “Runs into a…” I find that every time I write INT or EXT I feel like I need a break. Honestly. I feel like I need a break. So, in sequences where you are shifting back and forth, I feel like I need a lot of breaks. There’s something about writing a good old scene where two people are chatting in a café–

**John:** I love it.

**Craig:** Where you get to write INT and then just live in there in that place and have them do their thing. But my god, every time you EXT, INT, blah, EXT. I’m exhausted.

**John:** Tim asks, “My question for Mr. Koepp is when working with directors who are not necessarily writers like David Fincher, Steven Spielberg, or Sam Rami, what is the process of writing and revising based on the notes they provide?”

So, I guess you’ve probably worked with more directors than nearly any screenwriter out there. What are the different ways you see in interacting with a director? So even if you’re not talking about a specific director, what is the range of sort of how you work with them? Because I’ve had every different interaction with a director.

**David:** A director who does write is usually harder to work with than a director who doesn’t. A director who doesn’t usually has a healthy amount of respect for it and is grateful that you’re doing that. A director who writes themselves – and they try hard. Even when they’re good people, like Curtis Hanson was great. And who else did I work with that writes? I can’t remember. But they do it. And they kind of wish you’d shove over and just let them do it. And sometimes that is the reality and they do shove you over and do it themselves. So they’re a little tougher.

But my relationship with the directors have been 90% really good. The ones that are bad, or, you know, unpleasant tend to end fairly quickly, either by me or by them. But I do after about the third draft of a script I do say a little goodbye to my script.

**Craig:** Sure.

**David:** Because that’s the way it is. And sometimes in the very – the way New York crews do, or actually New York deli guys also – I call the director “boss” in part to remind myself, because they are. And they want a collaborator and they deserve a collaborator, but they are the boss. And you better not try – you’re better served – your material is better served if you don’t try to talk them into something, because if they do it they’ll do it poorly because they don’t see it.

**Craig:** Right.

**David:** And if they don’t see it it’s just much better for them not to do it. And you’re also – you can talk them out of some stuff, but if it keeps coming back, and back, and back you better do your best with it, because it’s going to be in the movie. Either you wrote it, or somebody else did, or they just made it up on the day.

**Craig:** Have you thought about television, David Koepp?

**David:** I’m told it’s different.

**Craig:** Wow.

**David:** Yeah, but you got to keep doing it.

**John:** No.

**Craig:** No, you actually don’t.

**John:** You can just do five and walk away.

**Craig:** You can do five hours and that’s it. It’s amazing. You can do two hours from what I understand. It’s quite remarkable.

**David:** Yeah, I hear it’s better.

**Craig:** It’s something else man. Yeah. Everyone calls you boss. [laughs] It’s pretty nice. I know. You see? He just got a faraway look in his eyes.

**David:** But I do like working with directors and when it goes well there’s nothing like it, because you come up with something neither of you could have done on your own. And when the conflicts are too great it usually does end quickly.

And getting fired, you know, it’s kind of the greatest thing that can happen to you. It’s awful. And you get very upset. But you get to be righteous.

**John:** Absolutely.

**David:** You get to be totally self-righteous. You’re suddenly free. They usually pay you anyway. And sometimes they come back. And you say, “Well, let’s just see about that.”

**Craig:** [Crosstalk]. You two guys are not Jewish, because there’s no like – when you’re Jewish and you get fired you’re not righteous. You’re like, “Yeah…” [laughs]

**David:** I had it coming.

**Craig:** Pretty much.

**David:** I get it. I got fired from something once. And I heard it from my agent, because they had hired someone else. I was waiting for notes and they’d hired someone else.

**Craig:** God, that’s a terrible way to find out.

**David:** It’s awful. So I called the studio executive who I was close with. And I said, “You know, what are you guys doing? You hired so and so.” And he sighs heavily and says, “Dave, this is a really tough phone call for me to make.” And I said–

**Craig:** You didn’t make it!

**David:** Exactly. I called you! I heard it in the gutter.

**Craig:** This is a really tough phone call for me to get.

**David:** That’s beside the point. All right. But see, self-righteous. I get to be self-righteous.

**Craig:** Self-righteous. Where I would have apologize and said, “I know. I’m sorry.”

**David:** I’m sorry I made you hire that guy.

**Craig:** I’m so sorry. I’ve made you uncomfortable by dying in front of you. [laughs]

**John:** Not just self-righteous, there is a quality to like I know the movie that I wrote and the movie that I saw in my head and you’re never going to make that movie. And so I know that the movie that I was going to make is going to be better than the movie that you made. There’s that comparison, too.

**Craig:** God, I wish I were you guys. How do I get this? Is there a food I eat? Is there a drink?

**David:** But there’s other times, though, where you really are the horse staggering through the desert. Just waiting to be shot. Thank god, what took you guys so long?

**Craig:** Yes. I will say that’s – my new jam is I’m desperate to be fired and it doesn’t happen anymore. It’s sort of really bad. It’s been a while. And I’m not saying that to humblebrag. I’m saying it like it kind of sucks because there are times when I’ve been on things and I just think well some – I feel like the guy – it’s the only thing I truly love from Waterworld. I don’t know if you remember this. On the boat, so there’s that big oil tanker that Dennis Hopper, he’s the villain, he’s in charge of. And there’s this old wretched man in the darkness inside who is like, I don’t know, shoveling oil or something. And in the climax someone throws a cigarette down there which is going to ignite everything and blow him up. And he looks up and goes, “Oh thank god.” And it’s exactly – like he waited for somebody to do this. Please let me go and it won’t happen. That’s actually worse than being fired.

**David:** It’s the great moment in Kingpin when Woody Harrelson comes out of his trailer park and there’s this guy sitting in a folding chair, smoking a cigarette with an oxygen tank, and he says like, “Hey Bob, how’s it going?” And Bob says – or he says, “Hey Bob, how’s life?” And Bob says, “Taking forever.”

**Craig:** That’s basically it. I mean, why won’t you kill me? Please kill me. And they never do.

**John:** This past week a couple people tweeted at me a story, an article by Alex Billington. He is a reviewer. He’s writing how at the Venice Film Festival, we also just got through the Toronto Film Festival, audiences are seeing movies and the critics are sometimes being held to embargoes so they cannot write about the movie, they cannot review the movie at the time. So we are not film festival goers. We are not reviewers. But I want to talk a little bit about embargoes because it’s a thing I think people outside of the industry may not be aware of is that sometimes reviewers are seeing movies way in advance and they are sort of prohibited from writing about the movie until the embargo drops and they can suddenly write about the movie.

We’ve all had movies that have probably been under embargo and then the embargo is lifted. How are we feeling about embargoes, or that sense of like when it’s OK to talk about a movie and when it’s not OK to talk about a movie that has not come out yet?

**David:** I think once it’s done if you show it in a public forum you can get reviewed. I think, remember when [unintelligible] showed up and it was horribly destructive. You know, you’re trying to work out your filthy business in private.

**John:** And they’d review test screenings.

**David:** And it’s really destructive because sometimes you’re having a test screening to confirm that the ending doesn’t work.

**Craig:** Yes. Correct.

**David:** Before you go make a new one.

**Craig:** Sometimes you’re having a test screening because the studio insists on this terrible version of your ending.

**David:** And you’re like well I’ll show you this doesn’t work. I’ll put it in front of an audience.

**Craig:** It’s the same thing with these people who review scripts. I mean, I agree with David. Once you show it to an audience – I mean, the point of an embargo is we’re going to make a deal with you. We’ll give you exclusive access. In return you agree to not talk about until the day we want you to. And now it’s your choice as a reviewer or an outlet to agree or not agree to those terms. But once they’ve shown it to people it does seem bizarre.

Although I will say Walter Chaw who is a very smart guy and a film critic had this really great idea that he tweeted about which will never happen but I loved it. He said, “The real embargo should be that no critics are allowed to post their reviews of movies until one week after it has come out in theaters.” Because at that point they’re no longer trying to review or influence or crap on or anything. They’re actually – they can do the job of film criticism which is to analyze and think about and thoughtfully talk about. And I thought oh my god what a wonderful utopic notion that is that will never, ever, ever happen.

**David:** We’re endosymbiont.

**John:** I don’t know what that means.

**Craig:** Oh nice.

**David:** One creature that lives inside or with another to their mutual benefit.

**Craig:** Like Quato.

**John:** That also feels like that could be part of Cold Storage.

**David:** Well it actually is. My novel Cold Storage, available now.

**John:** I love it that you’re bringing it back to plugging your book.

**David:** Well I learned all this science.

**Craig:** Yeah, use it.

**David:** I’m not going to just throw it away.

**Craig:** Pepper it into every discussion.

**David:** But, you know, we need critics. We need people to know about our movie. Ideally they’ll say nice things about it. And they need our stuff so they’ve got something to write about. But I think reviewing anything you’ve got by, you know, unscrupulous means or unauthorized means, of course that’s off the table. Anything that’s not done. I think if you show a work in progress at Cannes you can announce this is a work in progress and it should not be reviewed. And that’s fine. That’s a decent set of rules.

But if you have a finished film and you take it to Venice or Toronto and you’re showing it to people with the purpose of exposing it, but you’re showing it to the world, it’s too late.

**Craig:** It’s out. It’s done.

**David:** Yeah. You can’t control that anymore.

**Craig:** I agree. It’s not like in Broadway they’ll have runs, but then there’s the official opening.

**David:** And everybody understands.

**Craig:** And everybody understands. And Ben Brantley doesn’t show up until official opening night, or I guess the night before, or a week before so he has time to write his review that either destroys you or lifts you up.

**John:** Been there.

**Craig:** But the whole point is that the show is and can be changing throughout that time period. So it makes sense that you’re showing it to the public. But you’re saying, “But we’re still moving pieces around.” A movie is a movie. It’s done. I mean, by the time you’re showing it at – you’re not going to recut something after Venice, right?

**David:** Well…

**John:** Sometimes it happens, but yeah.

**Craig:** Oh really? OK. Well. I don’t know anything about film festivals. That’s obvious.

**John:** So here’s a modest proposal. So let’s say you see a film early and it is embargoed or for whatever reason you cannot talk about it. But of course you’ve seen this thing and you want to say like, “I saw this and this is my opinion on it,” if you wait until everyone can say that, you’re just like one extra opinion on that. But you want to say like, “No, no, I saw this first. This was my opinion when I saw it.” What you could do is write that up, encrypt it, and publicly post it and then on the day the embargo lifts like post the password to see what you wrote back then.

It’s a way of deep-freezing your reviews so that–

**Craig:** You could. That’s presuming that I care—

**David:** That you value that.

**Craig:** That those people had that opinion first.

**John:** Yeah. But people always want to be first.

**Craig:** They want to be first. Yes. They want to be first. I don’t care who is first.

**John:** I don’t know. See if other people think that is a good idea. It’s probably not a good idea, but it’s something that occurs to me.

**Craig:** I mean, you can do these things where you can – well, I guess you can password protect it and then on the day you can just say here’s the password to my review.

**John:** Exactly. That’s what I’m saying.

**Craig:** You could do that. Which I guess that makes sense.

**John:** Because you can definitively say like, no, this really was my opinion. I’m not changing my opinion based on–

**Craig:** Because suddenly other people like it, or, right. OK, then I’m on board. I’m on board with your idea.

**John:** So we’ll build an app for that.

**Craig:** Yep.

**John:** It has come time for our One Cool Things. Craig Mazin, do you want to start us off with a One Cool Thing?

**Craig:** Yeah. So you know I’m old school. I like email. The kids don’t like email.

**John:** No, I don’t like email.

**Craig:** You know, my children don’t use it at all. When I look at their email it’s just spam. It’s all spam. Because they go to stupid sites and they do sign up for things and then it’s just spam. It’s useless. But I’m still an emailer. And I’m always looking for the best email client. The mail.app that comes with Mac, I don’t really love it at all. I’ve been using Airmail for a long time. But I’ve switched over again, this time to Spark. Which has been around for a while. It wasn’t quite like ready for prime time for a while. But now it’s pretty great. They’ve got it down to a really nice science. It looks good.

It organizes your inbox in an interesting way. So, there’s new stuff and then if you read it it goes to Seen Stuff. So your inbox has new and seen, it doesn’t just like leave it in its spot, which is kind of cool. It also has little icons to indicate if it’s like a regular email from somebody you know, or a notification email, or a spammy kind of thing.

So, Spark, I don’t know how much it costs. How much does it cost, John August?

**John:** I’m looking it up right now. So free for 5GB for a team. Then it goes up to $6 a month, $7 a month.

**Craig:** So if you’re just a single person I think it’s free. Yeah, so there you go. For the exciting cost of free you too can have Spark. And obviously it’s cross platform. It works on Mac OS and iOS. That’s what I call cross platform. I don’t care about other ones.

**John:** So, Craig, is this one of those services that is downloading your email to their servers and then sending it back to you?

**Craig:** Great question, John. I don’t know. I don’t think so?

**John:** Because that’s one of the concerns with some of these things is that they are potentially privacy nightmares because they’re able to do a bunch of stuff, that processing, because they’re actually intercepting the mail before it gets to your service.

**Craig:** Well why don’t you look on their thing and tell me, because if it’s doing that then maybe I should stop using it.

**David:** I can take back what I just said.

**John:** And a private team, comments, shared drafts. It feels like it’s one of those things, but–

**Craig:** Really.

**John:** We’ll look into it. Next week we’ll get back to you.

**Craig:** Yeah, look into it. Yeah, I don’t want to do something wrong. I mean, I do. [laughs] I’ve got to be honest. I do. But I don’t want this—

**David:** The horse is out of the barn. Everybody has got everything.

**Craig:** Everyone has got everything.

**David:** Cover your camera. That’s about it.

**Craig:** By the way, do you do that? You don’t do that. I always feel that’s dumb to put the little Post-it over your camera?

**David:** I don’t know. Sometimes I feel paranoid and I do.

**John:** Yeah. I mean, I feel like the Macintosh has pretty good lockouts, like hardware lockouts. But they can – people can override stuff.

**Craig:** If they can override it they can probably shoot a laser right through that Post-it.

**John:** That’s what they’re going to do.

**Craig:** Yeah, or just assassinate.

**David:** Do you remember Chat Roulette?

**Craig:** Oh my god.

**John:** I do remember Chat Roulette. Chat Roulette is still in existence I think.

**David:** It was for about 48 hours Chat Roulette seemed like, oh this is terrific. This is the dawn of the Internet stuff. And then, you know, my sons who were like 12 and 10 at the time, within 48 hours it was all dicks all the time. There was no…

**Craig:** Dicks really have taken over the Internet. All new technology, it used to be porn. Now it’s just dicks. Terrible.

**David:** My Cool Thing, you guys I would imagine know about it already. Many people may know about it already. But it bears repeating because it changes my writing life. Which is the Freedom App. I love to use it.

**Craig:** Yes. I believe it’s been one of our One Cool Things at some point.

**David:** Oh, darn it.

**John:** No, no.

**Craig:** No, no, it’s great that you. Tell them, because it’s been a while.

**David:** Let me explain.

**Craig:** We’ve been doing this for a long time, so years have gone by. People have been born while we’ve been doing this.

**David:** All right. Let me explain. As we all know the Internet has ruined everything. Well, the political process and human interaction.

**Craig:** Other than that.

**David:** Exactly.

**Craig:** But it’s much easier to buy a book.

**David:** Oh yeah.

**Craig:** Way easier.

**David:** So, you know, like anyone I’m tempted by it. There’s tons to see and tons to do. Like, you know, so you can be writing and things are going OK for about four minutes. And then you realize, holy shit, I’ve got to click on the Guardian to check on Brexit, which is my – I’m crushed by the way because Brexit has been this fantastic TV show that has built to a climax.

Last night as we record this, Parliament was prorogued.

**Craig:** Yes.

**David:** And John Bercow resigned. John Bercow is like the greatest supporting character of any show ever. And now I’m bereft. Like what do I follow?

**Craig:** But they’ve also said that they’re not going to be a no-deal because they won’t support that.

**David:** Yeah. Well they passed a law that will get the royal ascent today I think. That they cannot leave without a deal.

**Craig:** So he’s prorogued for nothing.

**David:** Oh yeah, no, he’s screwed.

**Craig:** He’s done.

**David:** But what’s fascinating if you look at it as a TV show is this season was so great and they brought in a new character because the old Prime Minister character was a little boring so they got rid of her. They brought in this new crazy guy and he’s more interesting. It’s a terrible, terrible situation, but as a soap opera it’s been riveting. So, you know, reading Brexit news destroys my writing, as it does whatever your interest is of the moment.

And you know how it is. You’ll be writing along and you forgot to turn off alerts and a text pops up and suddenly you’re out of it and you’re in something else. Or an email comes in. Oh, I got to deal with that right now. Of course you don’t.

And Freedom is an app you can download and you enter in a certain amount of time for how long it will shut down your Internet and a degree of severity. You can shut down everything on all your devices. You can shut down just the computer you’re working on. Put your phone across the room. But whatever you choose.

I pick 60 minutes at a time. And within – that shuts down everything – and if there’s like a research question I have to just jot it down for when my 60 minutes is up. But really within about a minute and a half of turning on Freedom I start working. There’s no – it’s unbelievable. And your concentration is unimpeded. And I just think it has saved a lot of bad situations for me.

**Craig:** When I’m on a plane that doesn’t have Wi-Fi—

**David:** That’s outrageous first of all. That’s bullshit.

**Craig:** Which is outrageous. It’s a bunch of bullshit. How dare they? But my choice is write or clean up a bunch of files on the computer. In other words, or watch TV on that stupid little screen which I refuse to do.

So, yeah, you start working when you don’t have the Internet. It’s amazing. It’s actually disturbing.

**John:** Yeah. How [unintelligible] it is.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**David:** So I thought Freedom deserves another plug. Because every writer should have it. There’s no reason to not have it.

**John:** Yeah. I’m a big fan of working in sprints. And so I’ll start a 60-minute sprint. And I don’t use Freedom anymore, because I don’t need to shut down my Internet.

**Craig:** He doesn’t need it, dude.

**David:** You have mental discipline?

**Craig:** He’s beyond that.

**John:** No, because I start a 60-minute sprint and there’s a little timer that goes. And so as long as that timer is going I’m not switching to another window.

**David:** Great.

**John:** Especially if I go full-screen that also distracts me from–

**Craig:** So when I keep texting, like John, John I’m dying, I’m bleeding. John, this guy keeps stabbing me. Help.

**David:** He’s sprinting.

**John:** Sprinting.

**Craig:** Sorry, sprinting.

**John:** Can’t help. My One Cool Thing is a book I’m reading called The Intelligence Trap: Why Smart People Make Dumb Mistakes, by David Robson. I am liking it. It’s about how IQ tests don’t have the correlation to wise decision making you’d expect. So there’s some correlation but not really a very strong correlation. And sometimes the smartest people you know on IQ tests do really dumb things, or believe conspiracy theories. And he makes a pretty compelling case that being so smart on an IQ sense just lets you reinforce your mistaken beliefs again and again and again.

And it strikes me in a very D&D sense the difference between intelligence and wisdom. And those are two ideas that are related, but they’re not really the same thing. And some people who are not especially smart can be very wise. And so The Intelligence Trap, a book I’m enjoying.

**David:** If we’re doing books as well, can I throw in a Second Cool Thing?

**John:** Go for it.

**Craig:** Cold Storage? Out right now. By David Koepp.

**David:** Sure. But this came out about a year ago. It’s called Essentialism. And the title tells you pretty much what it’s about. But it’s a self-helpy thing. It’s actually more of a management book. It’s written for businesses. But it applied to your personal life.

As I’ve gotten older I’ve taken joy in what I get rid of, as opposed to what I accumulate. And asking yourself what is essential, not just among my possessions but in my interactions with other people. What’s really essential lets you focus on that and making them really be of quality, as opposed to a lot of incredibly superficial ones a few meaningful ones. And, you know, that book meant a lot to me.

**John:** Absolutely. It fits in with that sort of Marie Kondo, winnowing down to the things that are actually crucial, the things that you actually enjoy. We’ve talked about that in terms of screenwriting as well. It’s like getting rid of some of the frills and really focusing on what is fundamental to the story that you’re trying to tell.

**David:** Or in a scene. When you find that moment where you cut away like a page and a half at the beginning and a half a page at the end and you’re down to three lines but they’re great.

**Craig:** There we go. The one that Melissa is really into is Swedish Death Cleaning. Have you heard of that one?

**John:** No, tell us.

**Craig:** I guess the Swedes as they are so comfortable with death, their whole thing is you make sure that you’ve really gotten rid of a lot of stuff before you die. Because otherwise your family is going to have to get rid of it, which is a huge hassle.

**John:** My mom to her credit has totally done that.

**Craig:** Yeah. So just clean up as if you’re going to die next week.

**David:** You know that Billy Wilder story about – some movie that must never have been made. But he asked some poor writer to write a scene of marital discord. And so the guy wrote this couple, this middle-aged couple, they’re not getting along. And it starts out they come out of their apartment, they get in an elevator. They argue down the hall. Argue all the way down the elevator. Argue out on the street. It’s four pages long.

He says, “I don’t want to shoot this. We’ve got to do the hallway. I’ve got to do the elevator. I’ve got to do the street.” He says, how about this. They don’t say anything. They come out, they’re not talking. They get in the elevator. They get in the elevator and the guy is wearing a hat, of course. The elevator stops a few floors down and an attractive young woman gets on. The guy takes off his hat and his wife looks at him.

That’s great.

**Craig:** That works.

**John:** Yes.

**Craig:** That works. Yeah.

**John:** Fantastic.

**Craig:** Nice.

**John:** That is our show for this week. Scriptnotes is produced by Megana Rao. It is edited by Matthew Chilelli who also did our outro this week. If you have an outro you can send us a link to ask@johnaugust.com. That’s also the place where you can send longer questions. For short questions on Twitter, Craig is @clmazin. I’m @johnaugust. David Koepp, I believe you are not on Twitter. Is that correct?

**David:** I am not. I’m on Instagram. Dgkoepp.

**John:** Fantastic. Find him on Instagram.

**Craig:** You can see all of his pics.

**John:** You can find the show notes for this episode and all episodes at johnaugust.com. That’s also where you’ll find the transcripts. We get them up the week after the episode airs.

You can find all the back episodes of the show at Scriptnotes.net. And you need to sign up there to use the Scriptnotes app for iOS or for Android. You can also download 50-episode seasons at store.johnaugust.com.

You can find David Koepp’s book anywhere books are sold I believe.

**David:** You can.

**John:** And overseas as well? It’s in all markets?

**David:** Yes. It’s all over the place overseas. I’m going to London next week to shit on the government and sell it a little bit.

**Craig:** Look out Boris Johnson. Here he comes.

**John:** Fantastic. David Koepp, thank you so much for joining us.

**Craig:** Thanks David.

**David:** Thanks for having me guys.

**John:** Cool.

Links:

* [David Koepp](https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0462895/)
* [Alex Billington](https://twitter.com/i/moments/1170819858826584065) on [embargoes](https://www.firstshowing.net/2019/an-open-letter-about-the-harmfulness-of-embargoes-at-film-festivals/).
* [Cold Storage](https://www.amazon.com/Cold-Storage-Novel-David-Koepp/dp/0062916432) by David Koepp
* [Spark Email App](https://sparkmailapp.com/)
* [Freedom App](https://freedom.to/)
* [The Intelligence Trap: Why Smart People Make Dumb Mistakes](https://www.amazon.com/Intelligence-Trap-Smart-People-Mistakes/dp/0393651428)
* [Essentialism](https://www.amazon.com/dp/0753555166/ref=cm_sw_em_r_mt_dp_U_ckaGDbP6DX727)
* [John August](https://twitter.com/johnaugust) on Twitter
* [Craig Mazin](https://twitter.com/clmazin) on Twitter
* [David Koepp](https://www.instagram.com/dgkoepp/) on Instagram
* [John on Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/johnaugust/?hl=en)
* [Outro](http://johnaugust.com/2013/scriptnotes-the-outros) by Matthew Chilelli ([send us yours!](http://johnaugust.com/2014/outros-needed))

Email us at ask@johnaugust.com

You can download the episode [here](http://traffic.libsyn.com/scriptnotes/scriptnotes_ep_418_david_koepp.mp3).

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Newsletter

Inneresting Logo A Quote-Unquote Newsletter about Writing
Read Now

Explore

Projects

  • Aladdin (1)
  • Arlo Finch (27)
  • Big Fish (88)
  • Birdigo (2)
  • Charlie (39)
  • Charlie's Angels (16)
  • Chosen (2)
  • Corpse Bride (9)
  • Dead Projects (18)
  • Frankenweenie (10)
  • Go (29)
  • Karateka (4)
  • Monsterpocalypse (3)
  • One Hit Kill (6)
  • Ops (6)
  • Preacher (2)
  • Prince of Persia (13)
  • Shazam (6)
  • Snake People (6)
  • Tarzan (5)
  • The Nines (118)
  • The Remnants (12)
  • The Variant (22)

Apps

  • Bronson (14)
  • FDX Reader (11)
  • Fountain (32)
  • Highland (73)
  • Less IMDb (4)
  • Weekend Read (64)

Recommended Reading

  • First Person (87)
  • Geek Alert (151)
  • WGA (162)
  • Workspace (19)

Screenwriting Q&A

  • Adaptation (65)
  • Directors (90)
  • Education (49)
  • Film Industry (490)
  • Formatting (130)
  • Genres (89)
  • Glossary (6)
  • Pitches (29)
  • Producers (59)
  • Psych 101 (118)
  • Rights and Copyright (96)
  • So-Called Experts (47)
  • Story and Plot (170)
  • Television (165)
  • Treatments (21)
  • Words on the page (237)
  • Writing Process (177)

More screenwriting Q&A at screenwriting.io

© 2025 John August — All Rights Reserved.