• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

John August

  • Arlo Finch
  • Scriptnotes
  • Library
  • Store
  • About

Scriptnotes Transcript

Scriptnotes, Episode 593: The Ref with Richard LaGravenese, Transcript

May 11, 2023 Scriptnotes Transcript

The original post for this episode can be found [here](https://johnaugust.com/2023/the-ref-with-richard-lagravenese).

**Craig Mazin:** Hi, folks. This upcoming episode does feature some naughty language, so if you are in the car with children, put the earmuffs on or wait to play this when you’re at home.

Hello, my name is Craig Mazin, and this is Scriptnotes, a podcast about screenwriting and things that are interesting to screenwriters. This is 593rd episode of Scriptnotes, which is upsetting.

John is not with me today, also upsetting, but to counteract that, today on the show we have one of the best screenwriters simply of all time, and also one of the nicest people in Hollywood, which I agree is a low bar if that’s what you were thinking, but he would be a nice guy pretty much anywhere. We welcome Richard, AKA Richie as I call, Richard LaGravenese. Welcome to Scriptnotes.

**Richard LaGravenese:** Thank you, Craig. This is great. Good to see you.

**Craig:** It’s good to see you too. We are looking at each other over Zoom. Richie and I have known each other for many, many years. I have been a fan of his for many more years than I’ve known him. I’m going to run down a short list of some of the movies that he’s written, so that you can go ahead and drop your jaw like I do when I look at it all together like this.

The Fisher King, The Bridges of Madison County, The Mirror Has Two Faces, The Horse Whisperer, Beloved, Behind the Candelabra. These are all remarkable, highly acclaimed films, and yet we’re not going to be talking about any of those today, nor are we going to be talking about the seven other movies that Richie has directed.

What we are going to be talking about today is one of my favorite movies of all time. It is the 1994 film The Ref. The Ref was a criminally under-seen film. That’s why I want to dig into it, because I think from a screenwriting point of view, it’s remarkable.

Then in our Bonus Segment for Premium members, we’ll be talking about men without friends, how and why men should make friends, and how friendless men emotionally burden the women in their lives. That ought to be fun.

Normally, this is where John would do news and follow-up, but I simply have none. Instead, we’re just going to get right into The Ref. The Ref was released in 1994. It was, I believe, a Touchstone movie. Touchstone was one of the, I was about to say adult film arms of Disney, but that doesn’t sound right. Non-family movie wing of Disney. It was a Christmas movie, and that’s why of course they released it in March. Why would they have done that, Richie? Do you know?

**Richard:** I don’t know.

**Craig:** It certainly impacted the movie’s prospects. When it came out at the time, it was a bit of a box office bum. I think looking at how much money it made, if it came out today and made that amount of money, everybody would be dancing in the streets, but the business was different back then. The expectations were a little higher for theatrical releases. The fact that it didn’t necessarily make money right away didn’t mean that it wasn’t going to catch on as a cult hit and maybe even more than a cult hit.

The story is by Marie Weiss, screenplay by Richie LaGravenese and Marie Weiss, and directed by the late, great Ted Demme. I’ll do the quick summary, and then we’ll dive into the origin story of The Ref.

Quick summary. It’s Christmas Eve. Caroline and Lloyd, a middle-aged couple living in an affluent and very white and uptight Old Bay Bridge, Connecticut… Is that right, Old Bay Bridge? Is that the town?

**Richard:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Are having a marriage crisis. As they debate the past, present, and future of their relationship, they’re taken hostage by Gus, a thief on the run, but who has captured whom? Gus is forced to listen to their ceaseless bickering, as well as pretend to be a marriage counselor when Lloyd’s extended family arrives for the holiday, but his intervention, ultimately at the point of a gun, is what finally leads Lloyd and Caroline to be honest and open with each other.

This always struck me as a modern Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf take on Ransom of Red Chief, the old O. Henry story.

**Richard:** That’s right.

**Craig:** Is that where it began for you?

**Richard:** Absolutely. It started as a take on The Ransom of Red Chief. It was an idea by my then-sister-in-law, Marie Weiss, who was coming out of advertising and wanted to work in the movies, and her then-husband, Jeff Weiss, who is one of the producers on it.

I had a deal at Disney, because originally, Disney had bought Fisher King but didn’t make it but then put me under contract for three movies. You give them an idea. They give you an idea. They never take your ideas and usually do things off the shelf. That’s where Little Princess happened. The first thing was Widows, which just recently got made by McQueen. That was originally there.

**Craig:** Wow.

**Richard:** That was the longest development thing. That’s when Touchstone and Disney used to give you literally 16 pages of notes in development. At the time, we were making it a comedy for Bette Midler and Goldie Hawn, so it didn’t turn out that way. I was on that for months, like a year. It was terrible.

Anyway, the last deal was we brought to them this idea of The Ref. That’s how it began. She had this idea of a Ransom of Red Chief idea with an arguing couple and a family and stuff. With me guaranteeing it, she got to do a first draft, and then I came in.

**Craig:** Then you came in and you started doing what you do. The movie, I suspect, given the fact that it was 1994, which was thick in the middle of every movie makes money because it’s going to be out on VHS and DVD. I suspect that all it really needed was a star. Then along comes Denis Leary. Now, Denis Leary was a bit of a phenomenon at the time.

**Richard:** He and Teddy, they had a partnership, kind of.

**Craig:** I see. Denis Leary was, I think at that point, primarily a stand-up comic. Then he was doing some stuff for MTV.

**Richard:** Yes. Interstitials they call them.

**Craig:** Yeah, interstitials.

**Richard:** Teddy directed them. They were all Cindy Crawford-centric and really funny. When I hired Teddy, when we met on the movie, he brought in Denis.

**Craig:** One question to start with is, Denis Leary has a very specific comic persona. That comic persona is brought through here. As a character, he’s a quasi-chain-smoking, fast-talking, angry guy. That was his thing was he’s angry, he’s very verbal, he doesn’t have time. Every frustrates him. It is a perfect match, really.

The first question is, did he just pick that script up and go, “Oh yeah, if I just be me and say these lines, everything will be fine,” or did you say, “Ah, okay, now that it’s Denis Leary, I need to adjust the character of Gus to fit Denis Leary.”

**Richard:** I remember I always loved those fast-talking comedies of the ‘30s and ‘40s. He’s perfect for that, because he’s rapid fire. I now remember there were a few drafts that were going through, again, Disney development, Disney development. Then once we had a producer on it, it still wasn’t really clicking.

I remember it was me, Denis, Judy Davis, Kevin Spacey, and Bruckheimer. I rewrote the script in 4 days, bringing in 30 pages and 60 pages and reading with the actors the next day, the next day, the next day, and built it like that.

One of the greatest feelings you can ever have as a writer, it happened with Robin Williams too, is when you make someone like Denis laugh from reading the script. He was reading it cold, and he would start laughing.

Then we found the voice of it. In those four days, I think we really found the rhythm and the voice of it a lot. It’s easy to write for Denis, because he has a kind of 1940s delivery. You know what I mean?

**Craig:** “Here’s the thing. I’m going to do this. I’m going to do that. Hey, ho.”

**Richard:** Breathy and fast and just quick. I know there was a couple of bits he improved, like biting the baby Jesus cooking and things like that. We stuck to the script pretty much. It was a free form on the script. On the floor, we needed to come up with something funnier. That was it. It was finding the rhythm and then his ear.

I had known Denis also earlier. We went to Emerson together. We were in different groups, because I was in the theater thing and he was in the comedy thing. He started the Comedy Workshop there. I remember his shows with his little troupe. They were always really, really funny.

**Craig:** I’m fascinated by the fact that so much came out of those four days. There is this interesting intensity that can happen when you almost have a theater setting. It’s crazy. You have to deliver.

You’re working with Judy Davis, Kevin Spacey, who we will discuss purely as an actor in this podcast and not deal with all the other stuff. Those two alone, what’s interesting about them is how verbal they are as actors and how they’ve maybe never been more verbal than this. I want to give a little example here.

Right in the beginning, there’s two things that happen. The first thing is you establish the town. As the credits are coming on screen, the camera moves to this town, and we learn that it is a picture-perfect place, although there’s maybe the undercurrent of an issue, like the fact that the baby Jesus is missing from the [inaudible 00:09:44] in town square.

We eventually get to a marriage counselor, played by BD Wong. He is dealing with the angriest couple in the world. As they go back and forth, I always feel like the first five minutes of a movie teaches you how to watch the movie, and it teaches you a few things here. One of them is, tonally, these people are so hyper-verbal and hyper-literate in the way they talk to each other. I’m going to give an example here, because I’m fascinated by the way dialog works like this.

**Caroline Chasseur:** You took out a loan. I mean, it was your decision, not mine. You took out a loan from Satan Mom.

**Lloyd Chasseur:** She blames my mother for everything that’s gone wrong in her life. In the meantime, she never finishes anything she starts. Photography courses, existential philosophy courses, Scandinavian cooking classes.

**Caroline:** At least I go after my dreams.

**Lloyd:** To be what, somebody who takes photographs of lutefisk to prove the nothingness of being? No wonder our son’s so confused.

**Craig:** That’s gorgeous, right? He listed three classes, and then without a pause to think or put it together, he can come up with this imaginary idiot who’s used all the knowledge of those three classes. It really teaches you how this movie’s going to function and how these characters work. They both speak like this.

Talk a little bit about dancing on the edge of… One of the classic notes is, “This line feels written.” When you have actors like this, they can do it. There’s something almost play-like about it. Talk to me a little about how you addressed the manner in which they would speak and how literate and how many words and how writerly it would be.

**Richard:** I keep thinking of those first 15 minutes of His Girl Friday, when it’s Cary Grant and Ros Russell in the room. I’ve watched that scene about a million times. The rapidity and how they cram things into their references and you know exactly what they’re saying, and they’re insulting each other, they’re undermining and they’re funny, that rhythm was in my head as much as possible.

I’ve always over-written. I like literate movies. I like movies that are a little theatrical, that are not all exactly like real life. They’re just a little heightened. I think for comedy, it works.

Comedy, like music, goes through different grooves and different rhythms and stuff like that. It doesn’t always work, but I really think the classics do still work today, because there’s an intelligence behind them.

The rhythm was always in my head. I wanted to maintain it as much as possible. I had these two great theater actors, Judy and Kevin, who knew exactly how to find those rhythms. It’s funny when there are certain actors who just don’t know how to do that, today’s actors who don’t know how to talk fast. I was lucky. I was lucky with that and Christine Baranski, of course, later on.

**Craig:** We’ll get to her. You’re bringing up an interesting thing, which is that over time… It is a little distressing to me how much time has gone by, because this movie is almost 30 years old now, which is, I know, horrifying. Over time, actors have notoriously become mumblers, kind of introverts. I think acting quality has been too associated with that kind of navel-gazing and muttering. Here is this, where it’s a little bit like… There are certain bands where the singer is… Freddie Mercury is a great example. You understood every word he’s saying.

**Richard:** Articulation.

**Craig:** Articulation. There’s something so articulated about everybody here. The articulation of everyone is remarkable. I love that.

There’s another thing that happens here. First, we briefly meet Gus as a burglar who goes a little too far in trying to empty out a safe completely, but not before he’s sprayed by cat piss, as a very strange booby trap.

When we get back to the therapy session, one of the things that you do brilliant here is, inside of this one scene, in what John and I often refer to as this precious real estate of the first 5 or 10 minutes of a movie, you deliver so much exposition through therapy and through argument.

When that one scene is over, without us really noticing that anything has happened other than terrific entertainment and quite a few laughs, I know that Caroline has had an affair, that they haven’t had sex in a really long time, that they are in debt to Lloyd’s mother, whom Caroline hates and Lloyd defends, instinctively. Their son Jesse is a budding criminal delinquent.

Shortly after, in a connected scene where they’re driving home, I also understand that Caroline wants a divorce, and Lloyd isn’t going to agree to it. That choice is really interesting to me, because after a lot of this interesting exposition, all of which we will see echoed back at us, I’m not going to lead the witness. Why was it important that Caroline wanted a divorce and Lloyd wouldn’t agree to that?

**Richard:** Because I wanted there to be somewhere to go, because him agreeing to the divorce ultimately would be like an act of love, really. Right now, it’s about who’s got power and who’s going to get their way. That kept it open, so that there was conflict, like an engine going forward. If they both agree to the divorce, they’ve been decided, nothing is moving forward on that. I guess it could’ve worked, but it was more interesting to me leaving it open.

**Craig:** I think you made the right choice. Yes, it could’ve worked. They could’ve both agreed that they were going to get a divorce, and then at the end of it, they decide to call it off.

What I loved about the choice was that it felt… She says, “We’re miserable.” It felt like, okay, they are suspended in misery. These two people are stuck in this permanent misery where one wants to leave, one won’t let her leave. They can’t stand each other, but they can’t go anywhere. If nothing happens to them, this is going to be the way they are for the rest of their lives. That’s what I felt, because that is exactly when Gus enters. He is confronted now. It’s immediate. You guys don’t hide the premise. It’s right away, boom, “What did I do?”

There’s this wonderful scene where he gets in the car with them. We have a little bit of plot logic. I want to talk a little bit about the plot logic, actually, because it’s the most annoying part of writing these kinds of movies, but it’s essential. Gus has stolen jewels from, I think he’s the amusement park king.

**Richard:** I don’t remember.

**Craig:** It’s an old Willard. I think his name’s Willard. He’s out of town. There’s something about Willard, I guess his connections or whatever, that basically the theft of his stuff leads to this state police manhunt for the guy who’s done it. Why the manhunt? Why escalating it to the state police? Talk me through that storyline.

**Richard:** I can barely remember. Obviously, these are the least interesting parts of these movies for me to write. I’d rather just have people in a car or in a room talking for two hours and Virginia Woolf-ing it the whole time.

Making up this had to do with the McGuffin of the whole thing, because what happens at the end? If people aren’t searching for him, and it isn’t that big a thing, then there’s no tension of him having to hide in the house and pretend to be a therapist until he can figure out how to escape. We had to create this outside pressure cooker for him to stay inside the house. That really was all it was.

Again, it probably could’ve been better. It could’ve been a lot more logical or I just didn’t care. That’s the problem with me. I don’t outline. I get bored with that stuff. I just, “All right, that’s fine.” [inaudible 00:18:06].

**Craig:** In its own way, it works beautifully, because it’s simple. I can’t say that I understood necessarily why the one theft here led the whole state police manhunt to happen, but also, I kind of didn’t care, because when logic is in place to help me have a good time, I don’t interrogate it too much.

**Richard:** I think if you want to take the ride, you take the ride and you accept those things-

**Craig:** Exactly.

**Richard:** … because they’re not that important.

**Craig:** The way you set up the rules, it’s really simple. I don’t have to think much about it, because you don’t want me thinking about it. He can’t leave. He’s waiting for Murray, his getaway car guy, to call back and say he’s gotten a boat for them to escape. That’s it. He’s stuck in the house until-

**Richard:** Which is Richard Bright from The Godfather.

**Craig:** It is?

**Richard:** Yeah, he was in The Godfather.

**Craig:** He was in The Godfather?

**Richard:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Who was he in The Godfather?

**Richard:** He’s one of the younger… You’ll see him.

**Craig:** Oh, really?

**Richard:** He’s one of the assassins. He was a great guy. It was Richard Bright, wasn’t it? Yeah, it was Richard Bright. He was Murray.

**Craig:** Was he the one that was in the police uniform and shoots Barzini on the steps?

**Richard:** Yes.

**Craig:** Wow. I had no idea.

**Richard:** He’s in it throughout if you see. He’s in it throughout.

**Craig:** I had no idea. Oh my god.

**Richard:** Yeah, that’s Richard. He’s in a lot of movies.

**Craig:** That’s a connection I didn’t realize. Here’s another interesting fact for those of you following along at home. This movie I think was JK Simmons’s debut on screen.

**Richard:** It might’ve been.

**Craig:** I think it was. He plays Siskel. He’s a teacher at this military academy where Jesse, the son, is. We’ll talk about him in a bit.

We’ve set up everything we need to set up. You’ve done this beautifully. In the first, I don’t know, whatever it is, 10 minutes, I know everything about this town, I know everything about their relationship, I know everything about the rules that Gus has to deal with. Now we begin this triangle of characters for a while.

I’m also fascinated by this structure, because what you do is, once he meets them, once he takes them hostage, the movie splits into two halves. The first half is the three of them, that triangle. Then the second half is the larger family coming over. Talk a little bit about why and how you did that and focused in on the three of them first for quite an extended bit before bringing the family in.

**Richard:** They’re the heart. They’re the core of it. Then it was about showing the shark that’s coming towards the house to create some suspense and anticipation for what that collision is going to look like.

It was like a three-character play almost up until… I had ideas about turning this into a play, because it’s a one-set thing. You could have the whole thing in the house, in the living room for the entire evening.

**Craig:** Would you please do that?

**Richard:** I thought of doing that. It’d be really fun to do that. It was also for cutaways, because we had to skip time for them to prepare for the house. Denis had come up with the idea, had the idea of being the therapist. The fun of seeing this family coming towards them, I thought the audience was like, “Oh god, this is going to make complications in a farce kind of way, even better.”

**Craig:** It was incredible escalation. I appreciated, in a way, the quiet time, even though it was anything but quiet, between the three of them, because there’s a really interesting thing that happens almost immediately. First, as they’re driving to Caroline and Lloyd’s house, Lloyd blows right through a stop sign, which he says he didn’t see. There is no stop sign. Then when Gus gets them into the house and he’s got them tied up, he wants a cigarette. Lloyd says, “I don’t smoke, and Caroline quit.” As a smoker… Were you a smoker?

**Richard:** Yeah. Not like Denis, but yeah, I was.

**Craig:** I was as well, and so there was something absolutely delicious about a smoker seeing right into another smoker’s brain and going, “Where are they?” He knows she has has them. He knows instantly that there’s a hidden pack of cigarettes somewhere, and sure enough-

**Richard:** There are.

**Craig:** Because he has a gun, she has to reveal if they’re there. He says something to both of them that I think is kind of magical. In the film, he’s pushed them both over. They were in their chairs tied up.

**Richard:** [Crosstalk 00:22:28].

**Craig:** He’s pushed them backwards because they were bickering and they wouldn’t shut up. He comes over them. They’re accusing each other of being a liar. Gus says to Caroline, “You said you quit, didn’t you?” because she was like, “I never said I quit.” “You said you quit.” She admits it. Then he says to Lloyd, “You saw the stop sign, didn’t you?” Lloyd admits it.

In a way, what I love about this is the brilliance of starting the two of them in a marital counseling session with a completely ineffective counselor who cannot control them, and now here a guy with a gun is starting to make it happen. Talk a little bit, if you could, about the idea, even before Gus has to pretend to be a marriage counselor, the actual marriage counseling that he’s doing right here.

**Richard:** The joy of this for me, the most fun to me, was getting inside a marriage, and having been there myself. I don’t know if you’ve ever done this, but we used to do this a lot, where you get so into bickering with each other, doesn’t matter if you’re in public, doesn’t matter who’s there, everything goes away, and it’s just about who’s winning and who’s going to win. It’s like a match. It’s the information you use and the information you hold back and what you admit to and what you don’t admit to. This is how this marriage works. I was in the midst of that myself, and it was driving me crazy.

Having a character who just puts a gun to your head and says, “Tell me. Say what it was,” it’s like ah, then you finally get the truth. That’s how the marriage can heal, because they’re not really telling the truth to each other. It’s a power thing going on. They’re trying to each save their own skin. You lose the sight of the relationship, of the marriage. I think we do that a lot inside relationships when we bicker.

That idea was so real to me, of getting so lost in the bickering that you don’t care who is there, who’s around, you just have to get your point across kind of a thing. That was the fun of writing all that stuff, and then having him just cut right through it.

**Craig:** Cutting right through it is fantastic. There’s another thing that you set up so smartly. I would say to everybody, one of the things to do here is read this screenplay. Watch the movie. Read the screenplay. What Richie does in that first scene with BD Wong, who’s the failing marital counselor, is set up a situation where the marriage counselor says, “I’m not here to take sides. Basically, I’m not a referee. I don’t blow the whistle and say who created the foul.”

**Richard:** That’s right.

**Craig:** Here’s a guy who’s absolutely doing that, whether he realizes it or not. He is a referee. He’s saying, “This is what’s true, and this is what’s true.” In doing so, you start to see what they need, which I thought was a fascinating thing.

You described the incoming family as a shark. Talk to me about this. We meet the incoming family. They’re at dinner at a restaurant. They’re eating there because they know that Caroline is going to serve them something horrible and inedible, so they’re getting food first. Talk a little bit about this family now, these other ones.

**Richard:** Again, pulling from personal experience, the idea of a rich, controlling in-law that was a matriarch that was crippling the marriage, I liked. It wasn’t exactly my situation, but it was close, in a way, about how money can infantilize adult people around them. I wanted to get back at my in-laws for doing that, so I put all of the venom that I… You know when you have to be quiet at family gatherings and you want to say [inaudible 00:26:17]. I would just put it in the movie, like nailing yourself to a cross kind of a thing.

Out of that came her never approving of Judy Davis’s character, of her over her son and being too maternal love for the son and controlling and crippling him. I saw adult people crippled by their parents because their parents had money. My parents never had money. They always had problems. My dad was a cab driver. They never had that power over me. It was the first time I had witnessed it in that family. I played with that idea.

Her other son also being a soft doughboy. No one could stand up to her. He’s married to Christine Baranski, who’s just full of resentment and is trying to get along, is trying to make it through, but then when she sees what happens with Judy and Kevin, it gives her the liberation to finally tell the truth as well. It was really just a revenge thing for me to just get back at people who were too controlling.

**Craig:** I have to ask, since so much of this has been pulled from your own marriage, your own family, your in-laws, when the movie came out, did you get any difficult phone calls or no?

**Richard:** Went right over their head. No.

**Craig:** Isn’t that amazing?

**Richard:** Yep.

**Craig:** That’s amazing. People just can’t see themselves.

**Richard:** It’s I guess a good thing.

**Craig:** Were you worried about it?

**Richard:** No.

**Craig:** You knew that it would go like that. Wow. That’s amazing. It’s one of my favorite scenes in the movie, because we’ve been with this very literate, bickering, Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf trio, and then we go to this other group that is not that. They seem regular in one sense.

I think this was my first exposure to Christine Baranski. She is brilliant, because she’s so frustrated and angry about this entire situation and constantly takes it out on her kids. I think she says something like, “Be happy. It’s Christmas! It’s Christmas!” I do that all the time. Every time Christmas rolls around, I say it just like her, so angry.

We also, I think, meet the antagonist here in the purist dramatic sense, Glynis Johns, who is absolutely brilliant in this movie as Mother Rose. Appears to be the antagonist. Myself, when I’m writing, I don’t necessarily think about who’s the protagonist, who’s the antagonist.

**Richard:** I don’t either.

**Craig:** I’m wondering if in retrospect you would agree that she is the villain if there is a villain.

**Richard:** Yes.

**Craig:** That comes through pretty clearly. There’s something that happens prior to the family arriving, and that is a connection between Caroline and Gus that struck me as really interesting. They have a conversation as she’s leading him upstairs to find some band-aids for his dog bite that he got when he was escaping the crime. She tells him things. She tells him that she and Lloyd weren’t always like this and that they, in fact, had a restaurant, she worked, and they had a dream, and it fell apart.

I’m curious what you were thinking, because this feels so natural to me. What drew her to him? Why does she open up to him so easily? Why does she want to take care of him like that?

**Richard:** I don’t know that she’s taking care of him. I think she respects him. He’s about the truth. There’s no lying with him. I think that’s in the line too where he turns to her and says, “What are we, girl friends?” That was when Denis laughed at the script when he read that for the first time.

**Craig:** It’s so funny. “What are we, girl friends?”

**Richard:** She starts to warm up. She needs someone to talk to, and she doesn’t have anyone. He is this symbol of… He’s all about the truth. He’s all about no bullshit. It’s life or death. I think she feels the need.

I wanted to humanize. I had to start planting what was good about what they had and how do I bring that out, so that you understand there was something there. Otherwise, they’re just bickering. What are they fighting for? I had to bring up the past any way I could figure it out. Then later on, when it all explodes and then they start saying what happened in the past, then you understand. I had to give little seeds of that, so that there was something, a dream there.

I got too sentimental with it, so he undercuts it. He doesn’t want to hear it. I think she wants to open up and figure it out and thinks he can help.

**Craig:** There’s an interesting theme that’s going through, that exists separate from… I think the main takeaway of the movie really is, in a very simple way, that communication and honesty is really the only way to salvation when you’re dealing with a relationship that is not working.

There’s this other theme going on, which is the haves versus the have-nots. It’s throughout the whole thing. It comes out here when they’re walking up the stairs, specifically because he notes that they have a shagol [ph], an actual shagol. She’s like, “If you want it, you can have it.” She doesn’t care, be presumably, it’s something that Mother Rose paid for or bought. He finds that so offensive and points out that, “You people, you probably never even worked a day.” It did strike me that she wanted his approval as well, when she says that’s not true.

**Richard:** She wants his respect. She wants him on her side, which also happens in bickering couples, no matter who’s around. Whatever witnesses are there to the bickering, you want them on your side, so I think so. I think he’s pointing to the fact that, “You don’t even know what you have. You don’t value what you have.” She’s like, “No, you don’t understand. That’s not the point. It’s the cost. Is it worth it?”

**Craig:** That is an interesting idea that I hadn’t considered, that she’s buttering up the ref. She’s getting him on her side.

**Richard:** As a friend almost, yeah, like an odd liaison.

**Craig:** That leads to this big second movement of this story, and that is when the family arrives. There is something that happens here that I think is really educational for anybody that’s writing farce, because it definitely becomes farcical, at least for a while, in a fun way.

What you do here, and again, there’s just an elegance to it, is rules. The rules are simple. Jesse, the son, has come home. They’ve tied him up and put him upstairs. No one can go upstairs. Rule number one, no one can go upstairs. Rule number two, the three of us always have to be together. That is enough. That’s enough.

**Richard:** That’s hard enough.

**Craig:** That’s hard enough. The family arrives. A question about the family. You are Italian. You come from, I assume, a Catholic background, Catholic upbringing?

**Richard:** Yep.

**Craig:** I’m Jewish. I come from a Jewish upbringing. You’re a New York Catholic. I’m a New York Jew. It’s essentially the same thing. It’s basically the same, but this family is not. My wife is Episcopalian from New England. This reminds me more of that world. Talk a little bit about how you were able to present that kind of WASPiness so accurately and beautifully?

**Richard:** I remember, I think Marie came up with, which I thought was just funny, that they were Huguenots.

**Craig:** French Huguenots. We’re French Huguenots.

**Richard:** That cracked me up when she told me that.

**Craig:** Mid-18th century French Huguenot.

**Richard:** Yeah, which I thought was really funny at the time. I’m speaking at the time, because my situation is very different now. At the time, the in-laws were Scarsdale Jewish.

**Craig:** Got it. Let me translate for everybody else, Scarsdale Jewish. It’s in Westchester. It’s fancier, richer, but still Jewish. You’ve got one foot in the old ways, and you’ve got one foot in the golf club and all that, but you’re not old money rich.

**Richard:** There still were a lot of, I want to say there were affectations, but the way things are done, how things are done, the kind of dinner parties and what you say. The contrast was, when the shit hit the fan, all that went right out the window, and they were just like Italians, emotional and brutal and all that stuff, but all the upper crust stuff. Part of it was from that. I think it was just osmosis of watching a lot of films and reading things about how those families work and the Philip Barry world of Philadelphia Story and Holiday and those kind of things.

**Craig:** It’s interesting.

**Richard:** It’s a New York sensibility too, to a certain extent, an Upper East Side sensibility.

**Craig:** I think outsiders often do those things the best, because we have been watching them. Like you say, you’ve been watching those things.

**Richard:** You absorb it.

**Craig:** It’s funny. I was at a party a couple of weeks ago, and Maureen McCormick was there, Maureen McCormick who played Marcia on The Brady Bunch. I told her how my sister and I used to watch her and that show and yearn for that kind of… We thought of that as the best kind of life, this WASPy… Nobody yelled. Nobody was screaming. Nobody got hit.

**Richard:** Nobody got hit.

**Craig:** It was so wonderful.

**Richard:** No plates were thrown.

**Craig:** No plates were thrown. Your mother and father weren’t screaming at each other constantly. I love the notion of the outsider creating this but then also going, “There are worms in the dirt underneath this.”

**Richard:** Something underneath there. Absolutely. Absolutely.

**Craig:** There’s a fantastic moment in this dinner where as things devolve, and they devolve rather quickly, Mother Rose mentions, quite casually, Caroline’s infidelity, the fact that Caroline cheated on her precious son, whom she’s awful to anyway. The fact that-

**Richard:** That he told his mother.

**Craig:** That he told his mother, that fact just sends her into a rage.

**Richard:** As it would.

**Craig:** As it would. She storms off, which means that Gus and Lloyd both have to follow her. They go into the kitchen, and there’s the following exchange.

**Richard:** I love this scene.

**Craig:** This is one of my favorites. She says, “You won’t talk about it in therapy, but you’ll discuss it behind my back, with that bitch.” Lloyd says, “Hey, she’s my mother.” Gus says, “She’s a fucking bitch, Lloyd.”

**Richard:** He’s telling the truth.

**Craig:** That is the best referee moment in the entire movie, because somebody has to say it.

**Richard:** Somebody has to say it. Exactly.

**Craig:** Somebody has to say, “No, I just showed up here. I have no vested interest in this fight, but I’m telling you, she’s a fucking bitch, Lloyd,” which my wife and I have been saying just as a general phrase about anybody we think is a bitch. We’ll just say, whether it’s a man or a woman, “He’s a fucking bitch, Lloyd.” We always just put Lloyd at the end.

**Richard:** That means so much. I love that. That’s fantastic. That makes me really happy.

**Craig:** A fucking bitch, Lloyd. It’s the ultimate referee moment. It goes by very quickly. It’s not this big, dramatic… Nor does the conversation stop. It keeps rolling. That is almost like the match that lights the fuse that eventually inevitably leads to everybody saying everything they think.

Talk about how to do that scene, where you’ve brilliantly jammed all this gunpowder into a barrel. How do you blow these things up? How do you create a sequence in one room, where no one’s really moving around that much, and yet everything explodes?

**Richard:** The event is the act of opening presents at Christmas. That’s what you hang it on, like a tree. Then the heartbeat of it was the relationship between Kevin and Judy and them speaking again as if no one’s in the room and then getting everything out. Then you have all these people now who have somewhat of an interest invested in it, which is different than what we’ve had before, so they get to throw in their stuff and bring up their own stuff. The motor is the couple. Then all these other pieces come around when the timing and the moment feels right. Example is they’re talking the gifts, and Christine Baranski shouts, “Isotoners.”

**Craig:** Slipper socks.

**Richard:** The slipper socks. I think one version was Isotoner. “Slipper socks, medium.” All the resentments start to come out. The focus was on the relationship. That was the steady. That was the through line. Then everything else could jump off of it when it felt right.

**Craig:** There is this amazing moment where after watching an entire movie of these two tearing into each other and then watching this entire dinner with them tearing into each other and then this sequence here where they’re really tearing into each other, it finally comes out that Caroline wants a divorce, and they are. He’s fine. “We’re going to get divorced.” Gary, the stupid brother, says, “Why?”

**Richard:** He was so sweet.

**Craig:** It is one of the funniest things I’ve ever seen in my life. He’s so wonderfully innocent.

**Richard:** He’s very sweet.

**Craig:** So sweet. Oh my god, the look in his eyes where he looks like he was stunned by this thing. Everybody else is like, “What?” In this discussion, they finally get to the truth. What’s interesting is the ref, Denis Leary, in this sequence, says, “I don’t think anything.” He just-

**Richard:** Stands back.

**Craig:** Yes. You understood that the scam that he’s playing here, just for the purposes of the rest of the family, is that he’s posing as the marriage counselor. That’s to excuse his presence. He, as it turns out, is kind of the perfect marriage counselor. He knows exactly when to say, “You’re a liar. No, you’re a liar. She is a fucking bitch, Lloyd.” Here, it’s as if he actually gets invested. It feels like he’s invested.

**Richard:** This is the moment when it’s not about him hiding and it’s not about the robbery and it’s not about anything. He actually has been with these people all night, and he’s seeing what’s happening and is like, “No, this has to happen.” He just steps back.

He could’ve stopped it. He could’ve rerouted it, but he doesn’t, because he has heard her side of it, and he kind of is understanding Kevin’s side a little bit more. He knows this thing has to happen, and so he steps back and he just watches it. It’s an act of grace that he gives it. It’s not about him in that moment at all.

**Craig:** It’s a really interesting decision. It goes again to, I think there are a lot of movies when people are thinking about them or talking about them or when they try and write them and they’re wondering who the main character is, they will sometimes confuse main character and protagonist as the same thing.

What’s interesting is Gus maybe is the main… Denis Leary I suppose is the main character in a sense, but he’s certainly not the protagonist here. To the extent that it’s about people changing, it does feel like it’s about both Lloyd and Caroline, although I would argue ultimately, as is the case with almost every story, it comes down to one person making one choice that finally changes things.

I think for me, that moment is when in the middle of their arguing, Mother Rose says, “What does it even matter? They’re getting divorced,” and Lloyd turns to her and says, “Mother, is it possible for you to shut the fuck up for 10 seconds?” That to me is the moment where the protagonist there, I think-

**Richard:** Is Lloyd.

**Craig:** … is Lloyd.

**Richard:** That’s what the marriage needed all along.

**Craig:** All along.

**Richard:** To stand up to his mother.

**Craig:** There is this wonderful tradition in movies about psychological issues, relationship problems, and therapy, where it often comes down to one thing. I assume you go to therapy. You’re like me.

**Richard:** Been there 24 years now.

**Craig:** It would be great if therapy worked like this. In real life, it doesn’t, but in the movies, it often does come down to these little moments, like, “It’s not your fault,” or, “Mother, shut the fuck up. It’s almost like the walls come tumbling down.

**Richard:** One-word truths and then all the walls come tumbling down.

**Craig:** Everybody starts saying the truth. It is a wonderful conclusion of things. Before the family can be healed, there’s also the story of the son. What’s interesting about him, we’ve given him short shrift here, is that he is a criminal delinquent. It seems to be a reflection of the fact that his family home is broken. That’s what it feels like. He wants to go with Gus.

This is where there is this pathos to Gus’s sadness and a weight to him, even though he’s a funny character and he’s a burglar and he has the gun. We like him quite a bit, because he didn’t shoot anybody. He actually made things better. He expresses a sadness here. I just wanted you to talk a little bit about what is the story of Gus. Does it matter? Is he like one of the Greek gods that shows up in The Odyssey and then leaves?

**Richard:** It’s close to that, I guess. When I think about it, I don’t know that there was a lot of backstory. I think he had a lot of empathy for the kid. I have to be honest. This was the one part of the movie that I had… I wasn’t crazy about the casting. I like that kid, but I didn’t think he was right for the part. There wasn’t enough edge to him for me.

When I think about this storyline, I have to say, when Teddy and I hired Simpson and Bruckheimer to be our producers, because we had to pick from the Disney stable-

**Craig:** Got it.

**Richard:** We wouldn’t pick anyone that wouldn’t drink with us. Each one of the candidates we met at a bar. Teddy would lean [inaudible 00:46:08] go, “No, he’s a spy. We can’t hire him. No, he works for the studio.”

Simpson and Bruckheimer were a little bit insane. They had already had Top Gun and all this stuff. Then they made a deal. They saw this as, “Oh, Denis Leary, MTV. This is going to be a comedy for teenagers,” which was a big mistake. Don Simpson, who was a character in his own right, he detoured the script by making me do a rewrite that was all about the kid, because that was his thing. He wanted it to be about the kid.

We had the reading with the actors. The script had changed so much that Judy Davis got up and went, “This isn’t the part,” all of a sudden. I said, “I know. I agree with you. Please. I’m fast.” That’s when the four days happened, after that.

**Craig:** Oh, interesting.

**Richard:** The kid, that storyline was always, for me, a little… All I remember is we wanted to Gus to have this sort of humanity, hinting at a past, that he understood this kid in a way that his parents didn’t. I don’t know that we had any big past for him. We didn’t want to get too sentimental or too bogged down in that. He was going to help the kid in some way as well by his presence being there. Maybe you’re right. Maybe it was more like a Greek god that comes in and out.

**Craig:** Yeah, or like The Rainmaker. I always think of The Rainmaker, because I love that movie and just the idea of someone who shows up with bad intentions, a con artist, a thief, and yet is exactly what is required to un-suspend the misery, basically.

**Richard:** And get the truth out.

**Craig:** And get the truth out, exactly. Finally, at the end, the family is healed. Gus escapes. There is one of the greatest lines ever in history. Lloyd and Caroline are about to kiss, finally, when they are interrupted by Lloyd’s nephew, who says, “Sorry, but Grandma’s eating through her gag.” “Sorry, but Grandma’s eating through her gag.” It’s one of the greatest lines in history.

**Richard:** I love the way Denis did it. There’s an earlier line where he’s so upset with her, he wants to punch her. He goes, “Your husband isn’t dead. He’s hiding.”

**Craig:** “He’s hiding.” It’s so great.

**Richard:** Denis was great in that. The whole time he loses his shit.

**Craig:** [Crosstalk 00:48:34].

**Richard:** He’s like, “[inaudible 00:48:35]. Let me at her.”

**Craig:** They get it. They’re like, “We get it, but you can’t.”

**Richard:** They were holding him back.

**Craig:** They were holding him back.

**Richard:** I love that. Denis was so good in that.

**Craig:** “Mothers are supposed to be nice and sweet and patient and forgiving.” She really is horrible. With that wonderful mid-Atlantic accent, that not American, not British, kind of moneyed way of talking is absolutely wonderful.

Now, I read somewhere that the end here, which is a very happy ending, because Gus does escape with Murray on a boat, that that end was not originally the end.

**Richard:** It was re-shot.

**Craig:** Re-shot.

**Richard:** I believe we re-shot it, yeah. The original ending was Gus sacrifices himself for them in some way and gives himself up. Disney, they wanted it to be-

**Craig:** Happy.

**Richard:** Yeah. We had to re-shoot the ending.

**Craig:** It’s really interesting, because I remember those days.

**Richard:** They’re still here.

**Craig:** Studios still give notes and stuff, but there was something about the 90s. Maybe it was cocaine. I don’t know. There were so many notes. So many notes.

**Richard:** They’re still here. They’re still here. Streaming services are like that.

**Craig:** They’re still doing it. Through the crisis of writing drafts that you didn’t want to write, featuring storylines you didn’t want to feature, having Disney tell you to change the ending, all of that stuff, and then ultimately, all of it goes away in the crucible of those four days where you could just do the work.

**Richard:** Exactly, with the people that you’re doing it with, and not the executives, who are five steps removed and don’t really know how things work and don’t really know how things are made.

**Craig:** And also don’t know to release Christmas movies at Christmas. It’s the weirdest. Actually, March is the worst possible month, because Christmas happened, but it’s not a funny, ironic thing that it’s in the summer. It’s fucking March.

**Richard:** I also think we opened on the same day as Four Weddings and a Funeral, which was huge.

**Craig:** Oof.

**Richard:** Huge. I think it was the same weekend.

**Craig:** Lots of reasons why the movie initially didn’t do well, but it is something that I think adds character.

**Richard:** It was more, like I said, for a teenage MTV audience instead of an adult audience. I think that was part of the problem.

**Craig:** They must’ve been incredibly confused by that first scene, which I still think, if you understand what the movie is and who it’s meant for, is absolutely wonderful. Richie, we’re going to do a little segment now we call Drew Has A Question.

**Drew Marquardt:** I have a quick question on The Ref, because in the presents scene, I realized as I was watching it that we’re watching Lloyd do a monologue in a lot of ways, but it doesn’t feel that way. You’re hanging on every word. Very often, monologues aren’t done very well in movies. I was wondering if you could speak to how you set us up for that. Were you building to that the whole way through, or is that about following the logic of the moment?

**Richard:** I think it’s a few things. Like you said, it was building up all the way through. You want the audience to feel the way Judy Davis and Denis feel. They want this guy to blow up. They want this guy to tell the truth finally, especially when the mother enters the scene. You’re anticipating that, and you’re going, “Oh, here it comes. Now here it is.” You’re ready for it.

Another testament is that it’s just Kevin Spacey is a great actor, and he knew how to time it and he knew how to deliver it. The way Teddy directed it, with all the different characters there and their reactions and how to make it keep moving forward, keep moving forward. A lot of the energy of that is because of Kevin’s performance and everything that we set up along the way.

Finally, he’s blowing his top. In the first scene with the therapist, he’s snide, he’s sarcastic. They’re playing the game with each other of how they communicate, which isn’t the truth. It’s one-upmanship. This is finally taking the mask off. Okay, this is it.

It was revealing to me, and this happens in relationships, where everybody has their story, everybody has their side, but it’s not the whole story. Everything she said was true, but she forgot this. She forgot she wasn’t happy in that little apartment. She forgot this part of it. She didn’t understand the pressure he was under. To me, that was very honest.

It happens in all relationships, where you just get into the bickering, and you’re not really getting to how different people see things and their experiences and go, “Oh, I never thought of that. I never thought you were feeling that. I didn’t understand that. I thought it was power or something, and it wasn’t.” It was honest, and it was a lot of Kevin’s performance.

**Craig:** It’s also really interesting that you pull a little trick in that monologue, which is you don’t let him finish it. Everyone basically interrupts him, as if they’re too busy with their own crap. He has to pick up a fireplace poker and whack the Christmas tree over and over.

**Richard:** To get a symbol of why they’re there.

**Craig:** Exactly. “Shut up. I’m not done.” Then he gets-

**Richard:** The corpse has the floor.

**Craig:** The corpse has the floor. That reminds me so much of something that my dad used to say, which I won’t say on the air. It was the idea of feeling like you weren’t alive, the notion that you were being treated like a corpse that had been stuffed and stood up against the wall, not to be listened to and not to be considered.

**Richard:** Your father said that?

**Craig:** He would say something like that.

**Richard:** Wow.

**Craig:** I’ll save that for one of our confessional episodes. Richie, that was a fantastic discussion.

**Richard:** Thank you. This was great.

**Craig:** It’s amazing. I hope people do watch The Ref. I know for a fact it’s available to watch on Amazon Prime Video.

**Richard:** Is it on Disney Plus? I don’t know if they have it. Do they have it?

**Craig:** That’s a great question. I don’t know.

**Drew:** I don’t think it’s on Disney Plus, but we’ll put a link to it in the show.

**Craig:** Classic Disney.

**Richard:** [Crosstalk 00:54:43].

**Craig:** They’re still screwing this movie over. Guys, come on, put The Ref on. It’s so good. It is a fantastic Christmas, holiday tradition. We like to watch it every Christmas.

**Richard:** That makes me happy. Thank you.

**Craig:** We love it so much. Thank you for it. Now at the end of our regular show, we like to do something called One Cool Thing.

**Richard:** What’s yours?

**Craig:** I’ll tell you. I like to solve puzzles. I’m a big puzzle guy. For those of you out there who do enjoy, as I do, solving lots of puzzles, you will find oftentimes that you need to refer to the letters as number, so A as 1, B is 2, and so forth. Braille, binary, there’s something called a pigpen cipher, Morse code. You have to go around looking for all these things.

There’s an organization called Puzzled Pint. I think they’ve been my One Cool Thing before. They have, in one easy pdf, basically not all of, but a lot of the codes you would need to use, like NATO alphabet and semaphore and all the other ones I’ve mentioned, including binary, ternary, and hex. It’s incredibly useful, all in one sheet of puzzle solving, if you are, like me, a puzzle solver. We’ll include that link.

**Richard:** I love puzzles.

**Craig:** Oh, then listen.

**Richard:** I do the crossword on the subway every day.

**Craig:** Fantastic. You may find this interesting, especially if you expand into some of the stranger puzzles out there, which have begun to occupy me daily.

**Richard:** Did you Wordle?

**Craig:** Of course I do Wordle. Yes, I do Wordle.

**Richard:** I do Wordle.

**Craig:** We had Josh. What’s Josh Wordle’s actual name? Is it Wordle? It’s not Wordle. What’s his name?

**Drew:** It’s Josh Wardle.

**Craig:** Wardle. Wardle.

**Richard:** Wardle? Really?

**Drew:** Yeah.

**Richard:** Wow.

**Craig:** We had Josh Wardle on the show, who invented Wordle.

**Richard:** Wow.

**Craig:** Big Wordle fan, and also the Spelling Bee and the regular crossword as well. Do you have One Cool Thing for us, Richie?

**Richard:** Oh, man. I thought about this, and all I could think about was food.

**Craig:** Oh, we love food. Last week, my One Cool Thing was food. What’s yours?

**Richard:** There’s a place in New York, a couple of them, called Levain Bakery. Levain Bakery comes up with these cookies that are gigantic. One of them is a chocolate peanut butter. Literally, it’s a meal. You can only take little bites of it every day, because you eat the whole thing, you’re dead.

**Craig:** You’re dead.

**Richard:** It’s that big. They have a sour cream coffee cake. My mother and I always had this thing where we had to have cake, because she used to say it helps just to make the coffee go down. This is what she used to say. I had this thing in my head that I need cake to drink coffee or I can’t drink coffee.

**Craig:** It won’t go down.

**Richard:** It won’t go down. They have this sour cream coffee cake. I literally go to be at night thinking, “When I wake up, I can have the sour cream coffee cake.” I get so excited by it. It’s really good. It’s dense. It’s got all this sugar and maple stuff in the middle of it, and sour cream.

**Craig:** Oh, wow.

**Richard:** It’s a really great coffee cake. The other thing I can recommend is I discovered the benefits of celery juice. I buy this big bottle of Suji, I think it’s S-U-J-I or something, celery juice. It actually helps, because I have a terrible, terrible, acidic, nervous, ulceric kind of stomach, and it really helped. That kind of juice helps. There’s a couple things.

**Craig:** Those are both excellent recommendations. It’s Levain? Is that what it is, Levain Bakery?

**Richard:** L-E-V-A-I-N.

**Craig:** Levain.

**Richard:** Bakery. Great cookies. They deliver.

**Craig:** Do they ship?

**Richard:** Yeah, I think so. I use Try Caviar. They’re on that. I think they could ship to you. Their cookies are amazing. They have an oatmeal. All their cookies are gigantic.

**Craig:** Just like manhole covers.

**Richard:** They’re really good. They’re dense.

**Craig:** I love it. I’m going to unfortunately have to go and buy some of that stuff now. Thank you for that.

**Richard:** Thank you for this. This was really wonderful, because I don’t think anybody remembers the movie or thinks about it. Thank you. This meant a lot to me. Thank you very much.

**Craig:** I hope that we bring a whole new generation in.

**Richard:** And to Teddy.

**Craig:** Yes, and to Teddy, wherever he is, watching or listening.

**Richard:** And Denis too.

**Craig:** He’s wonderful.

**Richard:** That’s right.

**Craig:** That’s right. Scriptnotes is produced by Drew Marquardt. It is edited by Matthew Chilelli. Our outro today is by Matt Davis. If you have an outro, you can send us a link to ask@johnaugust.com. That’s also a place where you can send questions.

You can find the show notes for this episode and all episodes at johnaugust.com. That is also where you will find transcripts and the signup for our weeklyish newsletter called Inneresting, which has lots of links to things about writing.

We have T-shirts, and they’re great. Cotton Bureau. So soft. Highly recommend them, Richie. You can sign up to become a Premium member at scriptnotes.net, where you can get all the back-episodes and Bonus Segments, like the one we are about to record now. Richie, Drew, thank you so much for a terrific episode.

**Richard:** Thank you, Craig. Thank you, Drew.

**Drew:** Thank you, Richie.

[Bonus Segment]

**Craig:** Premium members, welcome back. Little, short treat for you here. Little bonus. I want to talk with Richie about… Because we’re both middle-aged guys. Apparently, middle-aged men have problems making and keeping friends.

There’s been some really interesting articles about this. There was one in the New York Times. This one was back in November of ’22, an article by Catherine Pearson titled Why is it So Hard for Men to Make Close Friends? “American men are stuck in a friendship recession. Here’s how to climb out.”

There’s also a slightly different view here back in May of 2019. This was in Harper’s Bazaar, written by Melanie Hamlett, Men Have No Friends and Women Bear the Burden. “Toxic masculinity and the persistent idea that feelings are a female thing has left a generation of straight men stranded on emotionally stunted islands, unable to forge intimate relationships with other men. It’s women who are paying the price.”

First of all, I guess one question I have is, friends-wise… I have a lot of friends. Have you encountered the middle-age man not having friends issue?

**Richard:** First of all, I’m not a straight man. That’s one.

**Craig:** Boom.

**Richard:** That’s been a change since we saw each other last.

**Craig:** You were.

**Richard:** Not really.

**Craig:** I know.

**Richard:** I pretty much assumed everyone knew so I didn’t have to say anything. No, not really. My wife knew before we were married. It was a second coming out. Sorry, I came out-

**Craig:** Second coming is a much more [crosstalk 01:01:43].

**Richard:** I came out when I was 18, but only halfway, not with my family. I don’t know that it’s about toxic masculinity or anything like that. I do have friends. They’re mostly writers, like you, that I know. I used to have friends through the marriage. I don’t have them as much anymore.

It is hard to meet people. I also don’t like a lot of people now. The world is so fucked up. I really can’t stand people. I’m becoming a hermit. It’s hard to meet people when you’re a hermit. You meet them through work. I just directed this movie and made lovely new friends there. Again, it’s through work. I think something that women don’t understand, maybe not, this is probably wrong, but we’re defined by what we do.

**Craig:** Men, you mean?

**Richard:** Yeah. When we’re not doing what we do, we are invisible. We disappear. There’s a lot of pressure about that. I think we find friends through what we do. I don’t really have sport hobbies or stuff like that. I have a trainer, a gym guy that I love, that I talk to a lot and I’m with a lot. I don’t know. How about you? Are most of your friends in the business, or do you have outside friends?

**Craig:** Most of my friends are in the business. Most of my friends are writers. We do get an interesting built-in fraternity, I think, in a sense, because there are a lot of people that do what we do, and we’re all complainers. I find that complaining about things really can bring people together.

**Richard:** Absolutely. Absolutely. Also, writing is a solitary activity. Years and years ago, because we’re in New York and not LA, where you guys know each other and see each other more, Robert Kamen used to live here and he started this dinner thing. It was me, Robert Kamen, Tony Gilroy, and at the time Stephen Schiff, but now Scott Frank is here. We would have monthly dinners just to check in. That was really nice. We went out of our way and had a beautiful dinner, complained, drank. It was really a great thing that we did every month almost. Now that’s dissipated as well. I think especially for writers, male writers, it’s a good thing to do, to reach out and create those groups.

**Craig:** I talked about my father briefly before in the episode. It did strike me that in his later years, I never really thought about my dad and friends. It wasn’t like my dad had a group of guy friends.

**Richard:** No, my dad either. He was alone. It was all for my mother, all for my mom.

**Craig:** Exactly. It was that way until my dad died. His relationships came down to his wife, and that was it, and then family if you had to have those family holidays and things. It does strike me as sad. It is an interesting concept that men who can’t keep a friend group of men start to overburden their wife or their partner, because that’s the only person they deal with. That’s the only person who hears their problems.

**Richard:** Their only outlet.

**Craig:** There is no way to process.

**Richard:** I think that’s true.

**Craig:** Part of what they discuss here is how hard it is, like you said, for men to meet each other. You’re looking for a friend version of Grinder, basically. I don’t know what we would call it. Women do seem to just meet each other and become friends so easily.

**Richard:** Open up to each other more easily.

**Craig:** Exactly. I guess we don’t have the solution here. How old are you, Drew?

**Drew:** I’m 33. I’m getting married this fall. I’m doing the list for the bachelor party. There’s my brother.

**Richard:** Who do you want to spend time with? Who do you want to hang out with?

**Craig:** It’s happened to you.

**Drew:** It’s happening slowly, in little bits. It’s strange. I think honestly, I’m closer with women than I am with men, for the most part. It’s also interesting talking about burdening your wives too. I found a little book called Point Omega where one of the characters has a thing. He’s fresh off a divorce and doesn’t know why it fell apart. One of the characters says, “It’s because you told her everything, not because you told her anything.” I always think about that. If you burden your wife or anything with that oversharing and feeling like they have to be responsible for all your feelings-

**Richard:** That’s too much. No one person should be responsible for everything. That’s why friends are really good to have, to share other things with. We got to fix this. I don’t know how we do this.

**Craig:** I don’t know either, but I urge men to make an effort. I think part of it is just making an effort and not being afraid to say, “Hey look, I’m actually fucking lonely.” You have to show a little bit of vulnerability, because if you’re just like, “Hey, you want to get lunch?” guys are like, “No, not really.” If I hear a guy say, “Hey, listen, I’m actually having some problems and I need advice. Do you want to have lunch?” absolutely.

**Richard:** I’d be right there for them, yeah.

**Craig:** Then you start to create… You also get perspective. Richie, you were married for I don’t know how long, a long time.

**Richard:** 35, yeah.

**Craig:** 35 years. I’m getting close. I’m at 27, I think. When you can talk to other people who are in marriages that are that long, the complaining feels very good, because you realize this is normal.

**Richard:** You’re not alone. You’re not alone in it. That’s a really important thing. That’s really important.

**Craig:** Otherwise, it just feels like you’re stuck in something. You don’t realize that other people are like, “Oh, it’s fine. I feel that. It’s okay. It’s totally normal.” I don’t think we solved the problem necessarily, but at least we can urge you out there, if you are a man, particularly if you are heading into your middle ages, make an effort. It’s worth it to have some buds. Richie, thanks again.

**Richard:** Thank you very much. You’re a bud.

Links:

* The Ref on [YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKthobV2JU4), [Amazon](https://www.amazon.com/gp/video/detail/B006RXQ1EI/ref=atv_dp_share_cu_r) and [IMDb](https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0110955/)
* [Richard LaGravenese](https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0481418/) on IMDb
* [The Ransom of Red Chief](https://loa-shared.s3.amazonaws.com/static/pdf/Henry_Red_Chief.pdf) by O. Henry
* The Ref’s [Opening Scene](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAa3zP1ysqo)
* [Puzzled Pint’s Code Sheet](http://puzzledpint.com/files/2415/7835/9513/CodeSheet-201912.pdf)
* [Levain Bakery](https://levainbakery.com/)
* [Get a Scriptnotes T-shirt!](https://cottonbureau.com/people/scriptnotes-podcast)
* [Check out the Inneresting Newsletter](https://inneresting.substack.com/)
* [Gift a Scriptnotes Subscription](https://scriptnotes.supportingcast.fm/gifts) or [treat yourself to a premium subscription!](https://scriptnotes.supportingcast.fm/)
* [Craig Mazin](https://www.instagram.com/clmazin/) on Instagram
* [John August](https://twitter.com/johnaugust) on Twitter
* [John on Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/johnaugust/?hl=en)
* [John on Mastodon](https://mastodon.art/@johnaugust)
* [Outro](http://johnaugust.com/2013/scriptnotes-the-outros) by Matt Davis ([send us yours!](http://johnaugust.com/2014/outros-needed))
* Scriptnotes is produced by [Drew Marquardt](https://www.instagram.com/marquardtam/) and edited by [Matthew Chilelli](https://twitter.com/machelli).

Email us at ask@johnaugust.com

You can download the episode [here](http://traffic.libsyn.com/scriptnotes/593standard.mp3).

Scriptnotes, Episode 592: Only One of Us Can Be the Hero, Transcript

April 27, 2023 Scriptnotes Transcript

The original post for this episode can be found [here](https://johnaugust.com/2023/only-one-of-us-can-be-the-hero).

**John August:** Hey, this is John. Heads up that today’s episode has just a little bit of swearing in it.

Hello and welcome. My name is John August.

**Craig Mazin:** My name is Craig Mazin.

**John:** This is Episode 592 of Scriptnotes, a podcast about screenwriting and things that are interesting to screenwriters.

Today on the show, why are action heroes named John and not Craig? We’ll think into the mystery of the J names and why you see so many Jacksons, Jakes, and Joes, and so few Craigs. I’m sorry.

**Craig:** Aw.

**John:** Can you think of even one action hero Craig?

**Craig:** Literally, not only are there no Craigs, but do you remember when we were kids and you would go to a theme park or something and there would be the big rack of personalized miniature license plates?

**John:** License plates, yeah. You’d find Bort but no Craig?

**Craig:** Right. You could find Bort, yeah, exactly, but Craig was rare. Even back when Craig was a name that some people had, it was rare, whereas you never had a problem.

**John:** Never had that any issue. Was there an H? Was there not an H? Both options were always available.

**Craig:** Exactly. You literally had variations on your name. I had nothing!

**John:** After that discussion, we’ll get into another round of the Three Page Challenge, where we take a look at pages sent in by our listeners and give our honest feedback. We’ll also be answering listener questions on research, options, and work for hire. In our Bonus Segment for Premium members, Craig, let’s talk anesthesia.

**Craig:** Oh, good.

**John:** I recently went under the knife, and wow, Craig, those drugs are good.

**Craig:** Yes, they are. Happily, we don’t have access to them.

**John:** No, and the people who do have access to them, like the Michael Jackson people who have access to them when they shouldn’t be using those, that’s bad.

**Craig:** That’s bad. We’ll get into that. We’ll get into that. I don’t want to give this away to the people that don’t spend the $5 a month. You know what? You don’t get it.

**John:** You don’t get it, but you know what you get? A quality show full of many other things, which we’ll dive into right now, starting with some follow-up. A previous episode about villains, we talked about the tied to the railroad tracks trope, that mustache-twirling villain who ties a damsel in distress to a railroad track.

Chris Csont, who does the Inneresting newsletter, sent through this great article that actually went through the history of the tied to the railroad tracks trope. It’s fascinating, because it’s not what you would expect. I thought it started with silent movies, but when we see them in silent movies, that was already a parody of an existing trope that came from stage plays.

**Craig:** Oh, really? That’s interesting. People were tying damsels to train tracks on stage?

**John:** Yes, and it became such a cliché. It became an early copyright lawsuit, because there’s a famous play that did it. Then other plays started having the villain tie the damsel in distress to a railroad track. Then it became actual copyright lawsuit things happening about that, whether you could copyright that action in a play, which seems crazy.

**Craig:** That’s crazy.

**John:** This article we’ll link to says that at some point there were six plays in London that all had that trope in it at the same time.

**Craig:** What I like is that the folks who did it first, so looks like Augustin Daly’s 1867 play, Under the Gaslight by American, apparently that was first, contained a scene “where a character named Snorkey is tied to the rails by a man named Byke.” What I like is that Augustin Daly wrote this play, probably thought, “This can be cool. That’s a fun idea,” and then everyone went insane. Everyone was like, “Dude, that’s the greatest thing we’ve ever seen.” Everybody went, “People are clamoring for other people being tied to railroad tracks.” Why?

**John:** It’s wild. It happened on stage before it happened in real life. Then after it happened on stage and in movies, there are a couple examples of it happening in real life. I think the other example that this article gives talks about how the idea of cement over shoes, like the mafia casing your feet in concrete, then throwing you into the lake. That was in fiction first, and then there were a couple cases where it happened in real life.

**Craig:** Where they thought, “Oh, that’s a cool idea.” It did always strike me as just very involved, really involved. Concrete is difficult, because the moment you pour it, it starts to set. That’s why concrete mixers are always turning. You gotta get some Quikrete. Then it’s messy. It’s all over the place. They’re thrashing around probably, so that’s annoying. Why didn’t you just shoot him? Just shoot him.

**John:** Just shoot him.

**Craig:** Shoot him. What’s hard about that?

**John:** We’ll put a link in the show notes to this article by Karl Smallwood, which talks through this. I just really enjoyed reading the backstory of how we got to this trope. I was just fascinated to know that it was already a jokey trope by the time we see it in silent films.

**Craig:** No one’s ever taken it seriously.

**John:** No, it’s never been taken seriously. Two other bits of follow-up. Actually, related follow-up. In that same villains episode, we were talking about Annie Wilkes from Misery. I said, “Oh, would Annie Wilkes have even been a villain if this guy had not crossed her doorstep?” Two readers wrote in to remind me that it’s set up in the movie that he discovers that she was actually involved in a series of baby murders when she was a nurse. She was a bad person before James Caan’s character shows up at the house.

**Craig:** What if those babies were jerks?

**John:** What if she knew they were gonna grow up to become future Hitlers?

**Craig:** Exactly. You don’t know what she’s capable of. I totally forgot about that. It did strike me that, look, if you are the sort of person who upon reading a novel that kills off a character you love, goes so crazy as to hit the author’s shins with a hammer, there’s no way that’s your first crazy thing. Nobody just starts there at the age of 53. Something happened.

**John:** It’s a ramp up to that.

**Craig:** Have you seen the movie Pearl?

**John:** I haven’t seen Pearl yet. I’m eager to see Pearl. I haven’t watched it yet though.

**Craig:** It looks to be a fascinating portrayal of just good old-fashioned nuts. I want to see it. It looks intense. Looks terrifying.

**John:** It’s hard for me to see a terrifying, intense movie. I just don’t have a space in my life or a time in my day where like, “Oh, you know what I’m gonna do? I’m gonna watch a terrifying, intense movie.” There’s just not a lot of opportunity for me, the way my life is set up right now.

**Craig:** How’s your life set up? You know what? Don’t go into it.

**John:** We watched The Last of Us in an afternoon at 1 p.m., because Mike does not want to watch a scary thing before bed, which I get.

**Craig:** I get that.

**John:** Mike has watched most of your show with his back turned to the TV so he can’t see what’s actually happening on screen.

**Craig:** That’s how we intended it. Boy, we could’ve saved a lot of money if we knew that everyone was watching facing away. Just a really nice, tight radio play.

**John:** Nice radio play.

**Craig:** That’s what we were going… You know what? The show sounds really good, so hopefully he enjoyed the sound.

**John:** It’s good sound mix quality here. We have a last bit of follow-up here. We talked before about European script consultants. Hillevi [ph] wrote in with a really good overview of the Swedish system. Hey Drew, can you talk us through what Hillevi wrote for his involvement with the Swedish system?

**Drew Marquardt:** Hillevi writes, “My day job is as a screen industry strategist for a regional talent development fund in southern Sweden. This is an organization that gets its money from the state and acts under the broad decisions made by the regional and local governments in terms of what their priorities are. A filmmaker will apply to us for money to hire a dramaturge to help them develop their script. We don’t really have development execs here. If we grant them the funds, we are not involved any further in that process.

“The idea is that the public funds will ensure that less commercially viable films will be able to be made and also so that people who have money are not the only people able to make films. In Sweden there is a democratic mission in the way public film funds are distributed. At the same time, any government influence is kept at, quote, ‘arm’s length.’ However, this paradigm is being tested more and more at the moment.

“The Swedish Film Institute was criticized by an independent oversight report for being too politically angled for launching initiatives to increase diversity and green filmmaking in the films being funded by the Institute. While those ideals are good, there is a danger in violating that principle of arm’s length. Since our last election, when the far right party got more power, there’s been a lot of talk about, quote unquote, ‘reviving Swedish culture,’ in a very specific way.

“If the arm’s length distance is no longer the norm, then there is a risk that the public funds for film development and production do become more of a propaganda tool for the state. If European filmmakers are being squeezed by global streamers on one hand and regressive far right governments on the other, color me concerned about what that will mean for the future of independent cinema in Europe.”

**John:** Thank you, Hillevi, for this good overview. I think it brings to light both what we’ve talked about in previous episodes, about how there is meant to be an arm’s length distance between the government funding and the actual filmmaking. They can use the money to hire [inaudible 00:08:56] not deliberately telling the people what they need to write, what their films can be about. That’s all meant to be there. That’s all part of the structure. The minute you try to introduce any kind of ands or qualifications or other things, it could also fall under political influence. That is a genuine worry.

**Craig:** That’s basically I think what we were concerned about. Any time a government is funding the arts, there is always the concern that they will bring some sort of governmental interest to bear, even if it’s done subtly. Hillevi points out something that we probably don’t think about much, and that is that governments change. If you set up a system that is run well or honestly by one administration, that is no guarantee that it will continue that way. Another administration may want to do something else with it.

We do have some public funding of the arts here in the United States, but precious little, not enough compared to how wealthy our country is. It’s limited enough where it never struck me that the government was influencing the content.

This is definitely something to keep our eyes on, because as he says, the paradigm is being tested more and more. Even when they are doing things that progressives might consider to be a positive, other people won’t, and then those people will come along and do things that conservatives think is positive and other people won’t. Suddenly, the arts have become a football, which no one wants.

**John:** The arts are traditionally associated with the left, and that’s why you always see when Republican governments take over, this talk about defunding the National Endowment for the Arts or defunding PBS, which of course mostly hurts educational outreach kinds of things of those institutions.

Just always be mindful that these things can happen, especially when you have any shifts in how government is structured. We tend to see these in the US and in Europe as shifts to the right, but you could also theoretically imagine shifts to the left, where suddenly, what was considered standard is now not considered acceptable for a new leftist government.

**Craig:** It’s odd bedfellows, as they say, government and the arts, especially considering what the mission of the arts is. I continue to be concerned about this method. I think even though our method isn’t perfect, it’s not terrible. That’s my full-throated defense of America.

**John:** We’re talking from the bias of a wealthy country that can spend a lot on the arts because we are a wealthy country, not as a nation, but just because we have the market to be able to drive a lot of things.

I think the goal behind these film funds was to make sure that you had a local arts scene or it is possible to make movies in your country. That’s the concern is that without the governmental funding, it may not be possible to really make a local film industry.

**Craig:** We wish everybody the best with that. Hopefully, it goes better than it goes poorly. What else can we say?

**John:** This is not really follow-up. It’s news, 20 years of follow-up. Andy Baio, who writes a great blog at waxy.org, for the last 20 years has been following the leaks of Oscar screeners. Basically, when movies come out for an award season, we get sent screeners. WGA gets sent screeners. The Academy gets sent screeners. These used to be DVDs. Then they went to Blu-rays for a little while. Now they’re all online.

He was tracking how quickly it’d go from this DVD was sent out to potential voters to it’s now leaked online [inaudible 00:12:32] that actual screener leaked online. It was incredibly quick. A large part of the high-quality movies you could find online were from these linked screeners. He was charting how many of those leaked each season.

This last season, not a single screener linked before Oscar night, for the first time in the 20 years that he’s been tracking it. He looks at why that has changed. It really comes down to the end of physical media, so moving more things to online services, and just the fact that by the time screeners have shipped out, there were already good online versions people could download that didn’t have to use the screeners as their source material.

**Craig:** I have a suspicion that that is one of the larger reasons why. That doesn’t bode well, because I think that the theatrical experience continues to come back, maybe not as quickly as some people want, but it’s coming back. That means that once again, as we head into the next year, that a lot of those movies will not be available on Netflix or any of the streaming services, they will be in theaters only, which means that there will be more of an interest in pirating them. Is Hollywood even trying? Nobody even tries, right?

**John:** Here’s what Hollywood tries to do. I think they are concerned about in-theater rips of things. Literally, the weekend that it debuts in theaters, if it’s available online, they hate that. They will try to do things to stop that. They can watermark the bejesus out of things. I’m sure they actually can do a pretty good job of figuring out what copy of what is the thing that is now on some sharing site, so maybe they can get some of those knocked down.

The huge worry over Academy screeners leaking and that being the way that piracy started I think can be put to bed, because that’s not the source of online leaks these days. The Academy app is great. I think that did a lot to help there. Even if we were still shipping DVDs around, I don’t think it would be the main source of piracy.

**Craig:** Here’s hoping, because while there are a decent amount of Oscar-nominated films that are from big studios and big movies, a lot of them are small. A lot of them are the kinds of movies that actually get damaged and the artists get damaged by this stuff.

I don’t know, it’s just a rough one. There’s so much copy-fightism inherent in what I’ll call the youthful left and not a lot of thought through on it. I think it’s easy to want everything to be free until you make something. Then you realize that you need to make a living. It’s not about defending the rich. It’s honestly about defending the people that are scraping by as artists more than anything else.

**John:** The films they are debuting at South by Southwest this week, some of those will be giant hits. Some of them will become Everything Everywhere All at Once, which was a South by Southwest debut. A lot of those films will have limited theatrical runs or will have to debut on streaming someplace or an exclusive debut on some platform. If you’re not watching it there, but instead you’re watching it through a pirated copy, those filmmakers who you say you want to support are not going to be supported. It’s making it harder for them to make their next film and everything else. All the previous speeches about the horrors of piracy are still true.

Craig, you are destined to be many things in life. You’ve achieved a lot, but you will probably not be defending the White House from attack. You’re not going to be stopping the runaway train. It’s not your fault, Craig. It’s your parents’ fault. They named you Craig. Mazin is a perfectly valid action hero name, but Craig is just not it.

**Craig:** No, it’s not. It’s mild.

**John:** It’s mild. You need to start with a J. You need to be a John, a James, a Jack, a Jake, Joe. This data supports this. We’re going to link to an article by Demetria Glace writing for Slate. She’s taking a look at, it feels like Johns and Jacks and Joes are over-represented. They are actually hugely over-represented among the characters when you have a single action hero in a movie or movie franchise. They’re way over-represented. As soon as you take out the James Bonds and the characters where they have 15 films in their history, the Js just run away with it. Is that surprising to you?

**Craig:** No. I think we’ve all seen this. There’s something that feels punchy and tough about the single-syllable name. These names, John, James, Jack, Jake, Frank, Joe, these are incredibly generic American tough-guy names. They’re also names that are not current. They’re names that have been around forever. They’re names that go back to the Old West. Because America doesn’t really have what the Europeans would call history, we have just have this whatever, short 400 or 500 years, these are the names that we have mythologized, and so it’s not surprising to see them come up over and over and over again.

When you look at the villain names, you notice that even though there are a couple of repeats, like James and Jack, most of the villain names are multiple syllables. Victor, Michael, Robert, Ivan, Simon, Eddie, Gabriel. Then there’s Ernst, which is just a straight up Nazi thing. Eddie in particular has a skeezy vibe to it. Eddie, he just seems like he might be a scumbag. Obviously, Ivan is your generic Russian terrorist.

Victor is one that always gets me. That always makes me laugh. I don’t know what it is about Victor. As a name, it’s a perfectly good name. It signifies victory. I think maybe Victor Frankenstein was it. I think it’s doomed.

Also note that villain names tend to feel a little bit more erudite. Simon feels like he’s a bit learned, and we don’t like bookworms.

**John:** No, none of those. None of those eggheads in our movies. Those eggheads are always plotting things.

**Craig:** They’re scheming, whereas a simple man, John, he’s just John. He’s a man of the earth. John. You know what you never see? You never see any of the what I call new American names, Jaden, Braden, Hayden, Maiden, Saden, Daden, all those. No, they’re not there.

**John:** My theory is they’re probably too new. They’re also, in many cases, ambiguously gendered. They can be used for male or female, so they don’t feel as strongly identifiably this is your male action hero star, so you’re not gonna give them that name.

**Craig:** You may be right. It really just strikes me how old-fashioned these names are. No one’s naming their kid Frank anymore, right? Are there still people naming their babies Frank? I’ve never met a baby that was Frank. That’s hysterical. Actually, now I want to have another baby and name it Frank, because that’s kind of cool. It’s a great name. Bruce.

**John:** Bruce, love it. Now, we’ve talked a lot about naming characters on the show and how I will stop and not continue writing until I can find the right name for a character, because it’s so crucial to just defining how I feel about the character and therefore how the audience hopefully will feel about the character too.

Arlo Finch, I spent a lot of time figuring out Arlo Finch’s name. I knew the rhythm of the name. I knew what it needed to do. Until I found that name, I couldn’t continue to write the story.

It does feel like something about the short, the John, the James, the Jacks, they are short, they’re punchy, for a character who literally will probably be punching some. In many cases, maybe a Joe or a Jack, they are a shortened, more familiar version of a longer name. That’s why you see a Joe. You don’t see a Joseph as a hero. There’s something familiar and next door about them.

These are also largely very white names. I think it’s important to keep in mind, this is looking back over the last 40, 50 years. We had a lot of white male action stars, so they were gonna have these names. If you look at the trends in the last 20 years, the J names have fallen a lot, and I think you’re gonna see a lot more names that are not these classically white names in those action male roles, because you’re not gonna write a character who could only be played by a white male.

**Craig:** Also, some of these names are names that I know Black people have these names. I know Black people who are named John or James or Jake or Jack or Joe. I think honestly, when you see a movie and the trailer says, “Jake Bronson was,” you’re like, “This movie’s gonna probably be bad,” because they didn’t even get past that. It’s pretty cliché. The best argument I think we can give people out there as they’re doing this is probably just avoid these now. They feel weak.

**John:** We’ll put a link in the show notes to this article. What I liked about it is she really did go through and pull the Occam’s razor. Is it just because those are the most common names? Is it because screenwriters are named with J names and then are picking those things? Is it because of Keanu’s hypothesis that when you say a J name, your mouth forms a certain hopeful place? It’s not really that. Probably a little bit all of the above. Each might be nudging a little bit closer there. I think there’s also an inertia in that we had a lot of J names and this became default for what we thought of as that one solo hero in an action movie.

**Craig:** I think also while you’re doing your villains, maybe give your villain one of these names. That’s kind of interesting.

**John:** Love it.

**Craig:** Why not? Flip the script.

**John:** Flip the script. Let’s flip the script on some Three Page Challenges. It’s been a minute since we’ve done this. For folks who are new to the podcast, every once in a while, Craig and I will do a Three Page Challenge, where we take a look at the first three pages from somebody’s script. It could be a feature. It could be a pilot. They sent those in. We give our honest feedback.

If you would like to read these three pages, you can look at the show notes. You can click there, see the pdfs, and read along with us. Drew will read us a quick summary of things, so in case you’re listening in your car, you have some sense of what the heck we’re talking about.

Reminder that everybody volunteered for this. They signed a little form. They went to johnaugust.com/threepage, filled out a little form, and attached their thing. We are not picking on people randomly. These are people who asked for our feedback, and we are happy to give them our feedback. Drew, this is your first time doing this. Are you excited?

**Drew:** I’m really excited. I’ve read these before with Megana, and I haven’t gotten to do this yet.

**Craig:** Here we go.

**John:** Let’s start with your first pick. What is it?

**Drew:** Let’s start with Flotsam by Sam Darcy. A montage of news clips informs us of the death of the neo-Nazi terrorist named Clifton Calwell. He was given a burial at sea to deny his supporters a place to mourn him. The sound of waves brings us to a Maori child, Jai, nine, looking at Clifton’s bloated corpse washed up on a beach. Jai puts the corpse in the basket of his bike and takes it to his backyard, where his two friends investigate and decide it’s the body of a pirate.

**John:** Flotsam. Flotsam starts with an image on the cover of a bottle and a thing on top of it. Cute cover page. Looks great. Just an email address on the front for our writer, Sam.

Then getting on to Page 1, I really liked how we did this montage of getting us up to speed on who this Clifton Calwell was, how we’re finding out about this. They are very short little news hits. We are bolding and uppercasing these little moments, but we’re not going to [inaudible 00:24:18] all this stuff, just a blast of images and video going past, dialog where we need it. Establishing this thing which we’re very clearly meant to be thinking it’s like bin Laden, how they buried bin Laden at sea so there couldn’t be a place to mourn. I get it. You’ve created this alternate universe where there was a neo-Nazi person like this who was a big enough threat that you would’ve done this at sea.

Then we are arrived at Australia on the beach, and here’s where it did not work as well for me. Craig, I want to get your initial opinions on how this first page worked for you.

**Craig:** Pretty well. It’s nothing we haven’t seen before. It’s the montage of lots of different people describing a news event, so multiple anchors. We have a character, Australian Anchor, American Anchor, and Another Anchor. I liked Another Anchor. Aw, what country are they from? There’s a Government Official, and there’s also a Late-Night Host. The Late-Night Host was doing a monologue, so that helped initially to give you a sense of, okay, this is some sort of bin Laden type thing.

Where I got a little nervous was… This is just a hard thing to do. I would say to Sam, when you are writing monologue jokes for fictional late-night hosts, they have to be good. They can’t be bad. Sometimes late-night hosts do have clunky jokes or super generic jokes, but you’re writing it, so people are already like, “You wrote that. It’s not real.” Therefore, it has to be legitimately weird or funny.

This one was very clammy. “Yikes, that’s a face only a Fuhrer could love.” I don’t really think that’s getting a laugh out of an audience. If you’re gonna do it, you gotta do it, for sure. Otherwise, you’re gonna put yourself a little bit in a hole right at the very top.

**John:** Agreed. That did feel like an unearned laugh there. I got nervous coming out of this. Don’t think we really stuck the landing.

“Camera flash. Sound of waves further encroaching.” The Government Official says, “The stench of neo-Fascism has been tempered today,” dash, dash. “Now the crashing of water, propelling us to: Clifton Calwell (30s). Bloated. Discoloured skin. Very much dead.”

The Government Official’s line was not especially helpful, didn’t tell us that we were coming to the end of this montage. Most importantly, I wanted to see the behind-the-scenes footage, the army footage of them dumping the body over, just that video footage. I didn’t want to see just… I needed a stronger image for this guy is dead and now he’s being pushed into sea. I wasn’t getting that in these delivered lines, so it didn’t feel like the end of this montage to me.

**Craig:** I agree with you, although I have a suggestion, because typically when they do this sort of thing, they don’t have footage of it, because they don’t want anyone memorializing it, basically.

What you could do is, one person could say, “There are reports that the body is being taken to so-and-so.” Then you could have another person on a panel saying, “I guarantee you they’re just dumping it at sea. That’s what they do in these cases. That’s what I’m hearing they’re doing. We’ll never know. No, we will never know, but I’m pretty sure.” Then somebody can disagree. “You’re an idiot,” blah blah blah. It’s a talk show. Then boom, the body washes up on shore. Clearly, the one guy was right. There’s a way to do it. It’s unlikely that they would film it and show it.

**John:** This is a probably entirely false memory, but I thought I remembered seeing something of bin Laden’s body being dumped into the water. Maybe that was a re-creation footage I saw. I feel like I saw something there. I definitely saw the equivalent of body cam footage of storming the compound.

**Craig:** Definitely, yeah. I remember that. I’m looking it up, dumping body ocean. Let’s see. There is a video, but it is a video that I don’t believe has been released.

**John:** There is a question of are we breaking the seal by showing this thing that would not be a part of the international news coverage to show that one thing. I don’t know. It’s a choice to make. I think you could go either way. What Craig pitched also works. I think we needed some stronger… Stick the landing here before we’re getting into more normal movie, because we’re changing our time and our tempo a lot.

**Craig:** You sure you want to say normal movie here?

**John:** The choices that are being made here are really fascinating. I don’t think they all work. I’m so happy we have this as an example, because we can talk about what’s working and where we got off the train.

“Exterior beach – early morning – continuous.” It’s not continuous. This is a whole new thing, so not continuous. Scratch that out. “Calwell’s legless corpse slumps in a cracked plastic capsule upon the sand. The tide froths then recedes around him.” You could do this where you could start with his body. I think that’s not gonna be your strongest choice.

I think your stronger choice is to start with Jai, our boy, who’s at the beach for some reason, because he doesn’t know that he’s looking for a body. He comes across this thing. Then we could gradually reveal, oh, it is actually this body and this corpse. I think this could be weirder and funnier, but by starting on the body, it makes it seem like the body is more important than this kid, who is going to be our hero for this story. Give us some moment of Jai before we find the body. That’s my pitch. Craig?

**Craig:** I kind of like this way, if we had stuck the landing on coming out of that montage. I think there’s something shocking about seeing that body. It is a startling cut, which I like, which then makes the reveal that a child is calmly looking at it also shocking and somewhat funny. Like I say, it has to feel like the cut to it is earned. If the cut to it is earned, I think it could be really interesting to see this kid.

Right off the bat, I will say, tonally there’s some nice things here. The fact that Jai [jae] or Jai [jai]… I’m not sure how to pronounce that name. I’ll go with Jai [jae]. Jai is wearing a Wrestlemania beach towel. I like it. There’s something already that feels very darkly comic about all of this.

Especially with what’s about to come, it reminded me of Peter Jackson’s early stuff. I suspect that our author, Sam, is either Australian or from New Zealand because of some of the spelling and the specificity of the location. Peter Jackson, obviously from New Zealand, some of his early stuff was just funny and disgusting. There’s a specific tone.

**John:** The body horror is a big part of this. What we’re seeing in these next two pages, just this disintegrating corpse that these kids are trying to examine, is fun. The way it falls out of his basket and just gets smeared on the road, love it.

**Craig:** People are gonna shriek. I’ve never seen this before in my life. “Calwell,” that’s the body, “draped in Jai’s beach towel, squeezed into the front bike basket like Norman Bates’s homage to ET.” That’s really funny, this nine-year-old kid biking along with a human torso corpse shoved in his bike basket. I’ve just never seen anything like it. It’s really fucked up and funny to me.

Similarly, “Calwell’s insides fall out of his torso.” That’s so gross. Look, I don’t know if I would watch this, but I appreciate that it doesn’t care whether or not I’m gonna watch it. It’s doing its own thing. It’s, woof, yuck.

**John:** Oof. Bottom of Page 2, we have two paragraphs here. I would flip the paragraphs. Right now we’re talking about Calwell’s insides falling out of his torso before we actually get to setting up where we are at. I think it’s gonna be funnier if we’re establishing this place and then coming back to the body keeps falling apart, which is great.

“Weatherboard beach shacks, scattered Norfolk Pines, and scorched lawns permeate our ride through Aussie suburbs.” Great. It’s a really good description. Give us a start there, and then let us get back to the body and the melting of it all, because after it’s falling out of the basket, “Jai’s created a Hansel and Gretel trail of neo-Fascist entrails. We linger low on some organ as he pedals off.” It’s gruesome. The movie knows what it is, which is fine and fun.

On Page 2, there’s also a link out to a song, Rocky Raccoon covered by Charlie Parr. I wouldn’t know what that was. We had a link here. We can play it if we want to play it. I support that as a choice.

**Craig:** No problem whatsoever. Where I was most pleased was with the third page of this, because now we’re getting into this interesting Australian/New Zealand, probably New Zealand is my guess, Stand By Me. It’s like a weird alternate universe version of that. You’ve got these kids, Jai and two of his friends, Toni, who’s 10, and Daley, who’s 8. Toni is Samoan, and she’s reached puberty already, and she’s tall and she’s broad. I love the words, “She’s a broad girl.” I think that’s terrific.

Then Daley is white, and he “is the Donny Kerabatsos of this Lebowski trio. Bug-eyed, feeble, and malnourished.” Malnourished is such a great… I appreciate that the script so far has maintained its tone in such a way that I see that a kid is malnourished and I am laughing. This was really funny.

Now he’s got 3 kids, 10, 9, and 8, are staring at this horrible vision of a dead neo-Nazi’s torso and head. Then Daley says, “I’m telling!” He runs. “Jai and Toni give chase. The camera remains. Rather, we hear the ensuring struggle. The three return, Daley caught in a Toni-induced headlock. Daley: ‘Okay!'” This is a pretty great juxtaposition of childish hijinks with absolute disgustingness.

Then there’s this last little bit here at the end of Page 3 where Toni asks, “Who is he?” which is this nice little bit of innocence. She doesn’t know, even though it’s been all over the news. He says, “A pirate,” which he doesn’t know either. I only can imagine where this is going. Do they think he has buried treasure? Who knows? It made me laugh. It was sick, and sick on its own terms. I thought these were quite successful.

**John:** I thought it worked really well too. The part you mentioned on Page 3 where the camera stays behind as they run off and struggle and then it gets dragged back into the shot, it felt a little… I never want to say directing on the page, but it felt like it was a little much for me, and yet the whole script is a little much, so I’m totally fine to go with it. Also, it establishes that this is going to have a very certain style to it. There were lines that would’ve bumped for me in other examples and didn’t bump for me here.

**Craig:** I didn’t mind it. I saw the moment. It helped me see the moment. I laughed. I laughed.

**John:** Obviously, what I’m looking for on Pages 4 and beyond is really establishing specificity of the characters and their voices and what they’re actually about, rather than just their basic descriptions. I feel like I didn’t know Jai as well as I knew the other two, even in this little brief moment. I’d love a little bit more sense of that.

I’d be curious to read where this goes next. Luckily, now with this innovation we have where people send us the log line, Drew can tell us what actually happens next in the script. Drew, what happens?

**Drew:** “When the body of an international terrorist washes ashore following a botched burial at sea by US forces, an enterprising child fabricates tales of pirate mutineers and buried treasure to his peers in an attempt to monetize his corporeal find. A short film.”

**John:** It’s a short film. Then I’m probably even more intrigued, because I was really wondering how this was gonna stretch into a full feature and where this was going to go. As a short film, I can see the closure it a little bit more easily. Craig, what are you thinking?

**Craig:** Look, short films are tough, but they are at least easy to make, although this one won’t be easy to make. You’ll need a body. A fake body. Please, Sam. God. Stand By Me, even though it was a full feature film, it started life as a novella or a short story, one of four short stories. This one was called The Body by Stephen King. I could absolutely see a short-ish version of that sort of thing, for sure.

**John:** Cool. Drew, help us out with our next one.

**Drew:** Next is Sockfoot by Jesse Allard. Autumn, late 20s, finishes having a one-night stand with a mid-20s punk boy on a mattress on the floor. He criticizes her for wearing socks during sex, so Autumn quickly decides to leave. The two have a drawn-out, awkward goodbye. Autumn drives to her nice, spacious apartment, where her burn-scarred cat greets her. Slumping on the bed, Autumn takes off her socks, only to reveal another sock fused to her foot.

**John:** Great. Craig, what’s your first impression of Sockfoot?

**Craig:** Putting the sock-foot aside, which we don’t really understand quite yet, it just felt very broad and under-baked in terms of characterization, dialog, relationship, action on the page. Multiple issues. A bit clunky. The sentences themselves were a bit clunky.

Let’s just start with the very first couple of paragraphs. “A vinyl spins on a turntable.” No. A vinyl record spins on a turntable. “The sounds of a hard hitting punk song blast through the speakers.” Hard-hitting should get a dash. “The sounds of a” we don’t even need. Just a punk song blasts through speakers.

“Another sound seeps through the music growing ever louder as we follow a path of clothes that litter the floor of the apartment leading to the bedroom.” We’ve got prepositional overload.

Really, there’s just a better way to say all this. We’ve got a punk song blasting through the speakers. What punk song? First of all, what punk song? You can’t just say punk song. Second, there’s moaning. Just say over it or through it, we hear moaning.

Then the clothing continues. We’ve seen the whole thing of the hastily discarded clothing leading up to two people having sex a million times, but to keep it going… It was, “A band shirt, a modest bra, a pair of black jeans. Men’s underwear, a pair of women’s underwear to match,” one pair of socks. “Only one pair of socks — black, holes in the heels and toes.” First of all, we’re not gonna notice that there’s one pair of socks. It’s just gonna be laundry to us.

They were having sex, and then we arrive there and we meet Autumn, and she’s done. She rolls off. Somehow, the camera arrived, but we didn’t even know she finished. It wasn’t like I was hearing people having an orgasm or finishing or anything. It was just moaning and then suddenly rolling off. She “cuddles up to Logan. They play footsie as they catch their breath,” which is not really how it works for me, but that’s fine. Maybe other people do that.

Then this was where I just felt like I was being hurdled off the planet. “After a moment, Logan looks a bit concerned. He looks downs,” so looks and looks. “He looks down at their feet,” and there’s a comma there which shouldn’t be there. “He looks down at their feet pulling back,” there should be a comma there, “pulling back the blanket to reveal their toes. Autumn is wearing socks, he is not.” His line is, “Did you just fuck me with your socks on?” Her response is, parentheses, “(confused,” semicolon, “a frightful air in her breath) uh… yeah… ” “Logan (playful but serious): Don’t ever do that again.” What?

**John:** I don’t understand those lines. I think, “Did you just fuck me with your socks on?” is a great line. I think it’s the outline of that moment. I think that moment I would pitch differently.

I get while the following their trail of clothes to a bed is a tropey, tropey, tropey trope, in this case I would allow it because it is about the fact that she cannot remove this sock which is permanently fused to her foot. I’m going to allow it, but I think we need to get to the bed more quickly.

They may have already been finished and were pulling up the covers or something, and he sees her socks. “Did you just fuck me with your socks on?” is a funny out. I don’t need the reaction from her or from him. Just let that be the thing. Then we get to the awkward going away, getting out of that house moment. There was just too much there. It’s like the moment had passed and we were still talking.

**Craig:** Also, they just met. They’ve just had sex for the first time. Who cares? Honestly, who cares that she fucked him with her socks on? Oh yeah, sorry if I was in the heat of the… We were rushing to have sex, because that’s clearly what happened. It wasn’t like we carefully took our clothes off. We threw our clothes everywhere and started fucking, and so whatever. Fuck, who cares? I don’t even understand. He says “playful but serious.” Excuse me? What does that mean?

**John:** Hard to do.

**Craig:** Hot but cold? Close but far. Then he says, “Don’t ever do that again.” What? That’s what he chooses to say?

**John:** I would love to see a great actor deliver that line in a way that’s playful but serious. Someone could do it, and it would actually completely work, but I’m having a hard time visualizing it, because even internally I’m not the great actor who can make that line work.

**Craig:** I just don’t know what the motivation would be. Again, just who gives a shit? It’s your first time together. It’s almost like she’s anticipating this question. It’s as if he looks down and goes, “Wait, do you not have feet?” Then she’s like, “Sorry, no.” He goes, “Oh, okay.” Then she goes, “Oh, no, he noticed.” Or, “Do you have hooves for feet?” Socks? Is it a crime? I don’t know. It just seems like such a weird thing.

Because it is the way that Jesse is introducing the problem for our main character, it’s just not… Everything that comes after it feels pretty off, because I don’t understand what the problem is. It’s like the script is saying, “Right? This is bad?” I’m going, “No, it’s not. It’s not that bad, not yet.”

**John:** We have a larger problem. After three pages, I don’t know what the tone of this is actually supposed to be. I think it’s supposed to feel bad for her because she has this injury, this sock fused to her foot because of a fire, apparently, but I don’t know how I’m supposed to feel and what the tone of all this that I’m watching is, because was this kind of sexy and then kind of funny and then she’s getting herself out of there? I just don’t know how I’m supposed to be feeling about this situation.

We’re not hearing the name of the punk song at the start, but then bottom of Page 2, “Everybody Hurts by REM begins playing over the Bluetooth.” Wait, is it playing ironically or is it playing seriously? I just don’t know how to take that song, because that song is so loaded that I am lost.

**Craig:** At the bottom of Page 1, “Autumn breaks a bit inside. This isn’t going to work out.” I don’t know why. I don’t believe that moment. I believe neither what Logan asked, nor do I believe her response.

Then the next scene says, “Living room – moments later. Logan and Autumn stand at the door.” This is what I call a dead start.

**John:** So hard to do.

**Craig:** They’re just standing at the door. It’s not one of them is getting the clothes on while the other one’s waiting. It’s not one of them looking for her keys. It’s not him helping her find her underwear. It’s nothing. It’s just two people just, boom, standing, bah. It’s a dead start.

Then what I also don’t understand is, the scene before, he says, “Okay, I don’t like that you had sex with me with your socks on,” and she’s like, “Uh-oh, this isn’t gonna work out, because he’s noticed the sock thing,” and then the next scene is him really being like, “Hey, I would like to actually keep hanging out with you.” She’s like, “Nope. Nope, gotta go.” I don’t understand what’s happening. I’m so confused. The emotional math is not adding up at all. Then Everybody Hurts happened, and I got very, very concerned.

Then we go to Autumn’s apartment. This, if you were counting along, is the third consecutive interior. Interior, interior, interior. Where are we? I don’t even know if we’re in a city, a town, big city, America. I don’t know where we are. I don’t know where we are. There’s a lot of description of what this building is like, and yet I don’t know what city it’s in.

**John:** There’s too much description of her place. The “apartment is very nice, a one bedroom with an open kitchen/living room area, fairly spacious and trendy with it’s exposed brick wall.” It’s is the wrong its.

**Craig:** Correct. Then another it’s happens.

**John:** “Recently been converted into an apartment, the kind of place most people in their 20s would struggle to afford on their own.” I don’t know ho to take that. Does it mean she has independent money? Maybe. Maybe she got money out of the fire, I guess, but that’s just a lot to be dumping at me in scene description that doesn’t help me understand this character.

**Craig:** I particular because I don’t know where we are. Is this a one-bedroom, nice, spacious, trendy, exposed brick walls apartment in Kansas City or Manhattan? That’s a huge difference.

“Autumn’s greeted by her cat, Luna,” and then quite a bit of description about the cat, and then a little bit of a burn scar there, so okay, we’re getting that there’s been some fire issues. Autumn says, “Sweet baby,” doesn’t say her name, doesn’t say Luna’s name, so we don’t know that it’s Luna, but fine. “Sweet baby. She pets Luna and heads to her room.”

I want to imagine this. She enters her apartment. Everybody Hurts is playing. A cat walks up to her. She says, “Sweet baby,” pets the cat, and then walks out. This is not a scene.

Then even weirder, after she says, “Sweet baby,” she gets to her bedroom and “slumps on the bed in defeat.” What was “sweet baby” about? Is she happy? Does Luna make her feel good? All of these questions are just piling up.

Screenplays are like the Titanic. They have lots of watertight compartments. They’re designed so if you puncture one of them, the rest of the boat can stay afloat, but if you puncture a whole bunch of them, it’s over. You’re sinking. Every single one of these moments of disconnect are creating a flooding of watertight compartments. The script is sinking here. This final line is not strong.

**John:** I can read it. “At least you love me even though I’m a monster.” This is after we’ve seen her fused together foot and the sock-foot, the titular sock-foot.

**Craig:** I don’t know what’s happened here. Drew will tell us. Initially, we’re like, okay, there was a fire. The sock was melted into her foot. They can’t remove the sock. It’s part of her foot now. I think it would be fair for her to say, “I was in a fire, and so I have to cover my foot.” That’s fine. She’s not hiding 666 or a Kuato. Do you know what a Kuato is, John?

**John:** Kuato from… It’s Arnold Schwarzenegger, Total Recall.

**Craig:** Total Recall, yeah. She’s not hiding a Kuato. She doesn’t have a foot Kuato. If the sock-foot fused thing is a Kuato, then that’s different. Even then, I think we need a different vibe. We just need a different opening. I just didn’t understand what was happening here. Help.

**John:** I do think the takeaway is that if you have a character whose central, initial dilemma is the fact that she has this sock-foot, this may be the wrong way to establish it, or you just picked the wrong character, this guy is not the right guy to be exposing that thing, because the scene as we saw, it feels like, why wouldn’t she tell him? We don’t have any understanding of why this is such a big deal to her at this moment. We just don’t believe it.

I do want to go back to one moment. I thought it was the right idea. On Page 2, this familiar moment where, “Logan goes to hug her. (It’s one of those awkward post one-night-stand hugs where there’s this question of do we kiss goodbye? Is that too intimate? Too personal?) His face lingers towards her for a split second while he contemplates what to do. Autumn saves him the trouble, quickly whipping her chin over his shoulder.” Overwritten, yet I got that moment. I was familiar with that moment. It felt like a nice thing to show, if it would’ve been a different scene getting into it.

**Craig:** Right, if I had understood why any of it was happening, because it seemed like in the scene before, she wants to be with him, and he doesn’t want to be with her, and then we cut to she doesn’t want to be with him, and he does want to be with her. I just don’t know why, but yeah, absolutely, it was an evocative moment. I didn’t even mind the overwriting because I understood it.

**John:** Yeah, understand it all. Drew, help us out. What is this about?

**Drew:** The log line is, “Autumn Cassidy is a woman with a secret, a woman with a sock-foot. Autumn is working as a preschool teacher with her best friend Sam, as they and their group of friends navigate the transition into true adulthood. However, Autumn’s secret, if exposed, threatens to destroy her relationships and her life, that is if she doesn’t do it first herself.”

**John:** I don’t believe that premise. I’m sorry. I don’t. I think it’s weirdly regressive. I don’t know. If I were a person who had one foot or something and I’m seeing this story about, oh no, her foot doesn’t look normal, I don’t get that. I’m frustrated by that premise.

**Craig:** I don’t understand it either. It is a challenge for people to have a situation like this, but it’s not something where it threatens to destroy every… I’m with John. I don’t believe it. Even if it’s causing a problem, it doesn’t cause a problem instantly like that. It’s just not that thing.

Look, if this turned supernatural and it did become a Kuato, then I would understand. I just don’t believe it’s a Kuato. I don’t. No, no, no, no, no, no. No. I think there’s something wrong. There’s something just fundamentally flawed here in this bit.

**John:** I want to thank Jesse for sending through these pages, because sometimes the pages that aren’t working give us a lot more to talk about and things people can recognize in their own scripts, like, oh, that thing you’re trying to do can’t work for these reasons. I do want to thank Jesse for sending these through, because I don’t want it to just be this slam on, “Hey, it just didn’t work for us.” Instead, let’s look at what we actually were able to take from this and discuss.

**Craig:** I would also say that it may be that after reflection and listening to this, even though it might hurt, Jesse, that you may find that there is a different story to tell with a similar premise. There was something that drew you to this in the first place. I think you need to dig into what it was and why and then ask how would this actually really, really go and what is it about this that you think could work in a more realistic way.

It may also be that you listen to this and say, “These two guys are out to lunch. This thing does work. They only read three pages. Screw them.” You might be right. You might be right. Either you will take constructive thoughts from this, and meaning you will create your own constructive thoughts, because I’m a big believer in destructive criticism when giving notes, it’s better than us telling you what to do, or you may be more convinced than ever that you’re on the right path. Either way, go forward, young man or woman or nonbinary.

**John:** Young man. We now know the preferred pronouns for all the people.

**Craig:** We do?

**John:** Yeah, because it says on the form now, so people tell us how to refer to them.

**Craig:** Oh, great.

**John:** An innovation which it only took us 10 years to figure out, oh, we should probably ask what people are, so we don’t have to guess based on their names.

**Craig:** Great point. Sir, take this and move forward. I believe in you.

**John:** Drew, give us one more Three Page Challenge, please.

**Drew:** Sure. Last we have Spark by Rachel Thomas. Winnie, 12, wakes up her sister, Lucy, 10, in the middle of the night, excited because it’s October 1st. The two girls jump out of bed and rush downstairs to find their mother, Clara, 40s, reading a book and using magic to bring a plate of cookies to them. Clara makes the girls wait until the neighbors are asleep before using her magic to decorate the house for Halloween. Giant spiders really move. Life-size skeletons dance with them. The girls are thrilled. When Clara takes them back to bed, Winnie makes it clear how badly she wants her witch powers, but her mother warns her that her powers may never come.

**John:** Great. I’m glad we’re talking about this sample, because we haven’t done anything quite like this before. This feels to me like a Disney Channel movie. It feels like a bright, poppy, made for TV kind of thing. I don’t mean that in a pejorative way. I just mean it felt very innocent. I want to approach that with I think the spirit in which it’s written. It’s very wide-eyed through the whole thing. It feels kind of innocent.

That said, my problem started at the very beginning, where I didn’t believe that these two girls were asleep and then waking up and then one is showing them a watch. That all felt really clunky. Either they know what day it’s gonna be or they don’t know what day it’s gonna be, what hour it’s gonna be, what hour it’s not going to be.

If one girl is asleep and her sister wakes her up, the older sister wakes her up, then I believe. Like, “It’s after midnight. We can go down.” It’s like, “Oh my gosh, yes.” Then we’re excited to get started in what is the equivalent of this family’s Christmas. It is finally October 1st and we can do all the Halloween things.

**Craig:** You’re getting at a problem that I think permeates these pages, and that is a lack of familiarity among people that are supposed to be the most familiar with each other. They’re family. This is not the first time this has happened. This happens all the time.

First of all, Winnie has a remarkable ability to wake up at exactly midnight. That’s pretty strange. It would make more sense, I think, to begin with a little girl just staring at this pocket watch, watching the second hand going until it finally turns midnight. Then she turns and she “taps Lucy gently on the nose,” and Lucy opens her eyes and says, “Is it midnight?” “It’s midnight.” Then they’re like, “Yay!” They know what’s going on. When they go outside to join Clara, who’s sitting on the front steps, where are they? Where are people?

**John:** Where are people?

**Craig:** Where are people?

**John:** I think it has to be Salem, Massachusetts, because all things with witches have to take place in Salem, Massachusetts.

**Craig:** That’s fine, but what part of the neighborhood of Salem, Massachusetts? Help us see things. Then Winnie says to her mother, “It’s my favorite day of the year besides Halloween.” Her mother says, “You’re definitely my kid.” Have they met before?

**John:** I think they’ve met before, yeah. I think they should have.

**Craig:** What’s happening? That’s not what happens. It just doesn’t feel like they are all really connected as family. There is a tonal thing here where it’s getting very juvenile, particularly when endlessly patient parents giggle at their children bothering them at midnight. These characters all feel like they’re saying exactly what they’re thinking. Do you know what I mean?

**John:** They do. I’m willing to let them have it a bit, because I placed it in this simpler, made for basic cable kind of universe. I think there’s a place for that kind of thing. There’s an innocence there that works. Yet this is a very pushed version of this. I think we could step back and sophisticate this a little bit and still retain the joy, still retain the innocence.

**Craig:** It doesn’t even require sophistication. “I can’t wait anymore. Let’s get started.” “You know the rules. We need to wait until all the neighbors are asleep.” Nobody feels real. They just feel like information bots at this point. It immediately goes into a lesson. “Can’t you make him go to bed?” “Winnie, using magic on other people has consequences.” It just feels so corny.

**John:** It does feel corny. Again, I’m willing to give it some of the corny because of just genre assumptions, the same way that in a body horror thing I’m willing to go there a little bit more. I definitely hear you, Craig. Let me validate you there. I did feel that too. I was just being more forgiving of it. Let’s talk about some things on the page that are just basic screenwriting things that need to be worked on.

**Craig:** Let’s.

**John:** Parentheticals go on their own line. In US screenplays, British screenplays for that matter too, your parenthetical goes on its own line. In this case, they’re just touching the dialog. That’s not how we do it here.

As we got into the montage on Page 3, where the house is being decorated, there are some fun elements in there. I would encourage you to break some things up a little bit more there and let these moments land separately, because the risk you have with these four paragraphs is people may just start skimming or just start skipping over some things. I would say break those moments out a little bit more. You might even want to do some bolding in there. Just do some things where you get a sense of what it is that we’re establishing and what has changed.

Going back to Craig’s earlier note, I don’t have a sense of what this house is normally, other than it’s a Victorian. I don’t know what neighborhood we’re in. I don’t know what I’m seeing and what I’m looking at. I have no sense of how close the neighbor’s house is. I just need it to be placed and anchored in a space more clearly from the start.

**Craig:** I agree with everything you just said. Rachel, when you have a montage like this, where you’re showing them decorating the yard with Halloween stuff and mom using a little bit of magic to help it go along and make it go faster and fun, and then you follow it up with Lucy asleep and Winnie saying to her mother, without prompting, without any prompting whatsoever, “I’ll definitely have my powers by next Halloween,” I think you’ve missed an opportunity to show that she does not have her powers.

Does Lucy have her powers? If Lucy has powers and Lucy’s using magic and mom’s using magic, then I could see Winnie getting frustrated. If Lucy doesn’t have her powers, but she doesn’t care, but Winnie keeps trying to do it and does care and doesn’t like that her mom has to do it. I want to motivate her character problems.

She literally says, “Winnie looks out over her neighborhood, having the time of her life.” Then the next thing she says is, “I’ll definitely have my powers by next Halloween.” “Win, some witches never get their powers.” You can just see where this is going.

**John:** It is called Spark.

**Craig:** Look, here’s the thing. It’s fine to do a straight up formula movie. Children in particular really enjoy them. They can be done beautifully. Pixar at this point has mastered a kind of formula. It is gorgeous.

This scene right here feels so blatantly setup-ish that it is bordering on somebody reading out loud, “Interior attic bedroom – later. Winnie doesn’t have her powers yet, and she really wants them, and her mother is saying, ‘You might never get your powers and you might need to accept that you are special as you are.'” It is literally that setup-ish here. We gotta do better, just for pure entertainment sake. Otherwise, it will feel perfunctory.

**John:** I would say you would find scripts of this genre that do similar, really clunky things and [inaudible 01:00:31] “I should write a script that is like that.” I think the challenge we’re both arguing for is how do you write the better version of that that gets you the job to write the thing that does get made? I think this as a writing sample needs to be above the minimum level that you see in that kind of genre.

**Craig:** Completely agree.

**John:** Cool. Those are our Three Page Challenges. We want to thank everybody who sent in their Three Page Challenges, especially these writers, for letting us talk about them on the air. If you have three pages you want us to take a look at, go to johnaugust.com/threepage, all spelled out. There’s a form there. You will say that it’s okay for us to talk about them. You will attach your pdf. It’ll go into Drew’s queue for next time. Drew, thank you for reading through all these with us.

**Drew:** Thank you. Thanks, everyone, for sending it in.

**Craig:** Drew’s Queue is a great name for a Blue’s Clues type of show.

**John:** Drew’s Queue.

**Craig:** Drew’s Queue.

**John:** Until this very moment, I hadn’t realized how much Drew Marquardt feels like he could’ve been one of the Blue’s Clues guys, 100%. If he put that sweater on, he absolutely could be a Blue’s Clues… You could have Blue as your cartoon dog.

We have listener questions that we won’t have time to get to this episode, so we’ll save them for next episode. Craig, I do think we have time for some One Cool Things. You got a One Cool Thing for us?

**Craig:** I do. This One Cool Thing actually comes from my assistant Allie, who like my assistant Bo before her, is quite the foodie. She was talking about a place that sounds amazing. I gotta go. She had a very specific recommendation. If you do like Indian food and you happen to find yourself, I believe it’s in the Los Feliz or Silver Lake area, it’s called Pijja Palace. Pijja Palace?

**John:** Pijja Palace.

**Craig:** Have you been?

**John:** I’ve been. Pijja Palace is built into a strip mall that’s connected to a mid-budget hotel. It’s very unpromising from the outside. You go inside, it looks like a sports bar, and yet the cuisine is actually Indian-inspired, non-Indian dishes. You have listed here the Malai Rigatoni. There are just pizzas and other things, but they all have Indian flavors and not Indian traditionally foods.

**Craig:** She got me the description of the Malai Rigatoni, which instead of a typical Bolognese, it’s in more of a masala sauce. It sounds delicious. I’m gonna have to check that place out. I just like the name of it. Pijja Palace.

**John:** Pijja Palace, it’s great. Definitely check that out. My One Cool Thing. We’ve talked before on the show about GeoGuessr, which is this great game where you are plopped somewhere in a Google Maps situation, street view of Google Maps. You have to figure out where the hell you are. You only have a certain number of guesses. Basically, once you make your guess where you are, it’s how close you were to the actual place. My daughter loves to play it.

I want to link to this YouTuber named Rainbolt, who is just really, really good at GeoGuessr. The video we’ll link to shows this meme, this Vine from many, many years ago, where this guy, he’s stepping off this curb, he says, “So no head?” It’s a five-second clip. The clip went viral. In this video, he tries to figure out what curb this guy was stepping off of. The way he can figure this all out is just masterful. It’s very Sherlock Holmes in terms of using the cues of just what the fire hydrants looked like, how many bars are on the telephone poles next to him, what other metadata he can find for this user who has these videos. Really, really smart. It’s no surprise he gets it down to the exact street, within one foot of where this video comes from.

**Craig:** That’s awesome. I love that.

**John:** That is our show for this week. Scriptnotes is produced by Drew Marquardt.

**Craig:** Who?

**John:** Edited by Matthew Chilelli.

**Craig:** Unknown.

**John:** Our outro this week is by Richie Molyneux. If you have an outro this week, you can send us a link to ask@johnaugust.com. That’s also the place where you can send questions. You can find the show notes for this episode and all episodes at johnaugust.com. That’s also where you’ll find transcripts and sign up for our weeklyish newsletter called Inneresting, which has lots of links to things about writing.

We have T-shirts and hoodies. They’re great. You’ll find them at Cotton Bureau. You can sign up to become a Premium member at scriptnotes.net, where you get all the back-episodes and Bonus Segments, like the one we’re about to record on anesthesia. Craig and Drew, thank you so much for a fun show.

**Craig:** Thank you, guys.

[Bonus Segment]

**John:** Craig, when was the last time you were under anesthesia?

**Craig:** I would say it was probably eight months ago. It was the last time I had a spinal epidural injection.

**John:** That doesn’t sound good at all. I was under anesthesia just last week. I had these weird bones growing underneath my tongue, it’s called mandibular tori, that was making it hard for me to speak. The oral surgeon cut them out. To do that, they had to knock me fully out. There was an anesthesiologist. It wasn’t just a little drug. It was fully knocked out.

I remember talking to this guy about skiing, and then suddenly, much time had passed, two hours in fact, and I was waking up and being moved to this recovery room, and no idea what had happened, didn’t feel a thing. Later in that day, I realized, wait, how did I get home? Mike told me that I had fallen asleep while we were walking to the car. I asked, “Why is there a trashcan here?” Apparently, I had asked for a trashcan to be brought into the room.

At the time, I had felt like I was actually completely fine, but I realized I was not forming memories of that time. It was fun. It was such a different experience than I’ve had in quite a long time.

**Craig:** Yes, amnesia is cool. It is a very strange thing. The history of anesthesia is a remarkable thing and is inextricably linked, as far as I’m concerned, to the kinds of surgical advances we’ve been capable of. Without anesthesia, there just simply is a vast category of surgery that is impossible. It’s just not possible.

**John:** We used to do amputations without anesthesia. They could hold somebody down, but there’s no way someone could’ve sawed these out of my mouth without anesthesia.

**Craig:** There is. It would’ve been very difficult, and you would’ve been in horrible, horrible pain. What we can’t do, for instance, are things like a heart transplant or kidney transplant or anything involving lungs or kidneys, internal organs. Those things are really hard to do because people just keep writhing around. It’s just hard to do. Amputations is just a straight sawing. The trauma of that kind of injury is insane.

The crudest anesthesia was ether, chloroform. Those things were pretty brutal. Prior to that, back in the old, old days, it was just basically alcohol. I don’t think there was much else going on there. Then just holding you down in misery. Anesthesia is magical.

**John:** It is magical. A question for when you see in vintage things or post-apocalyptic things, it’s like, oh, some alcohol as I pull this bullet out or whatever. I don’t fully get that, because I can drink a couple shots of something. It’s not gonna make things hurt less. I guess I could be less combative, I guess, or are you drinking to the point where you’re actually blacking out, and that’s the goal? I’ve never blacked out from alcohol. In the old days of alcohol, how much alcohol were they using?

**Craig:** Quite a bit. Obviously, they would’ve used alcohol as a topical antiseptic as well. Drinking-wise, we do know that alcohol affects the GABA pathway, gamma-aminobutyric acid, I believe, which is connected to our pain pathways. When you are very, very drunk, you don’t experience pain at the same level that you do when you’re not. You’re more confused. It’s harder to tell what the hell’s going on. Alcohol is a central nervous system depressant, which means that it can in fact knock you out, and if you’re knocked out, you’re knocked out.

Now, knocking you out without killing you is a trick. Alcohol is a toxic substance that we know can kill people in excess, and so is every single anesthetic that we use for surgery, which is why we need anesthesiologists, medical doctors, who very specifically administer this and monitor you and your breathing. Now, for a procedure like yours, my guess is you had an IV and they used propofol.

**John:** They did.

**Craig:** Propofol is wonderful. They used to use Versed.

**Drew:** It’s magic.

**Craig:** Propofol’s magic. They used to use Versed a lot. Propofol is better because it wears off much faster. Propofol actually gets metabolized by your body really quickly, so it’s perfect for these shorter procedures, because you don’t spend an hour or two hours groggily coming to. I believe Versed is more of a benzodiazepine, I believe. That’s the whole Valium family. That stuff is great.

When you’re dealing with serious surgery, where you have to be out for a long time, they can’t just keep hitting you with Propofol. Propofol is actually quite irritating to the veins. That’s when they give you the old mask on the face. Often, you’re intubated, which means that they have to breathe for you or need to be able to breathe for you if it comes to that, because so much of what they do to you is also paralytic.

**John:** Drew, you were saying propofol is great. You’ve had experience with it?

**Drew:** Yeah. I had a procedure last fall. I had a colonoscopy last fall. They injected it into my hand. It was interesting, you saying, Craig, that it’s hard on the veins, because one of the things I remember before I went under-

**Craig:** It burns.

**Drew:** … was that there was a weird pain. It burns.

**Craig:** It burns.

**Drew:** Saying to the anesthesiologist, “Hey, is that normal?” I think he got out the Y-E of yes before I was out.

**Craig:** It does tend to burn. Sometimes they will put a little bit of lidocaine in there with it to reduce the burning sensation, I believe. Yep, colonoscopy is a perfect example of a propofol nap. When I get those injections, propofol nap. Depending on the position you’re in, it’ll go right in the back of your hand. That’s where they have their IV.

Because I’ve had the procedure done a lot, on average once a year now for about, I don’t know, four years, five years, different anesthesiologists do it differently, I’ve noticed. Some of them push it in slowly, and those are my heroes, because you get to feel awesome for about five seconds.

It seems lately the new ones are like, “You know what? We actually don’t want you feeling awesome. We don’t want you coming back to enjoy your five-second propofol holiday. We’re gonna push it in much faster, so you’re gonna be fine, fine, fine. Bye-bye.” There’s not that euphoria. I have experienced the euphoria. It’s almost like your brain is inflating like a balloon with happiness and then you’re gone.

**John:** I’ve had a bunch of colonoscopies in my life, because my whole family gets colon cancer. In those cases, I don’t know what they’re using. Maybe it’s propofol. I’m just in a twilight state, so I actually am aware and conscious during it. It’s not been a problem. They’re giving me enough of something that I just don’t care at all, but I am actually awake for it in ways that were so different than my experience here.

This is much more like… I had to have my nose fixed, have my deviated septum fixed. In that case, you’re just completely out. You wake up completely like, “What just happened?” In this case, I was talking about skiing, and suddenly just a whole bunch of time had passed.

**Craig:** The fact is, when we say we go bye-bye, we don’t actually know what’s going on, because I think with propofol, a lot of times, like you say, you’re in this weird in and out state. They call propofol milk of amnesia, because it looks milky. You just don’t remember. You may have been talking throughout the whole thing. You don’t remember, because you’re just-

**Drew:** Oh, that’s horrifying.

**Craig:** … totally doped up. Yeah, but it’s not like you’re in pain. You’re not shrieking and going, “Oh my god, take this camera out of my ass.” You’re like, “Hey, what’s going on? My nose is weird.” You may be talking, but you don’t remember later.

**John:** When my daughter had the same surgeon take out her wisdom teeth, she was goofy on the drive home in the way that you love. We have video of her asking goofy questions. That wasn’t me at all, at least not to my recollection of it. I seemed perfectly normal. I wasn’t actually forming memories, in ways that were surprising to me and also made me think of, oh, you hear stories of date rape drugs. It feels like, oh, I can see why that is so problematic, because I didn’t have agency over my own memories, which was strange.

**Craig:** I’ve had that experience too, where I even realize, I know I was in the car with Melissa, we drove home. I know we talked about stuff. I don’t remember any of it. Any of it. I was awake, perfectly awake. Propofol definitely messes with the whole memory system.

**John:** It’s not sleep. Every night we have the experience of what it’s like to fall asleep and what it’s like to wake up. It was the suddenness of the change that was so striking to me. Not that I remember falling asleep every night, but I get the sense that you go down the ramp and then you come back up out of the ramp. This was just like lights off, lights on. It was just a very different experience for me.

**Craig:** It’s very fast. One thing that strikes me as really interesting about the propofol nap is I do dream vividly during it every time it happens. When I’m coming out of it, I’m coming out of dreams. Then there’s just that confusion for a moment of like, “Where… Oh, right. Oh, yeah, that. All that happened.”

Here’s an interesting thing. Talk about the amnesia. When you get this epidural injection, I’m on my stomach, and they put a needle all the way into the epidural space in my spine, and they inject stuff into it. Then they take it out. It occurred to me once, I was like, “How do you get me out of there?” because it’s not like I wake up in there. I wake up on my back in another bed in a recovery room. They were like, “Oh, you just wake up, and we help you down, and we get you over onto this other thing and wheel you out, and then we get you onto this thing and you do it.” I’m like, “Okay, so I’m awake. I have zero memory of that.” I have never once formed one memory of any of that.

**John:** That’s wild. Hey, speaking of knocking out, something I’ve been meaning to ask you is, in the last episode of The Last of Us, one of the characters is hit with a back of a rifle and knocked out. Talk to me about your decision to do that and how you feel about that as a thing that is done in movies and TV, because in real life, people shouldn’t do that.

**Craig:** No, you should not do that.

**John:** In movies and TV, it happens a lot. What is the reality of hitting somebody over the head like that? What does it really do? What is your decision making process of showing that or not showing that?

**Craig:** There was a lot of head hitting in the game. People get hit in the head a lot and get knocked out a lot that way. We avoided most of it. That was an area where just story-wise we just needed someone to get knocked out. We had done it earlier, actually, as well, when Joel knocks a guy out, and then he comes to, and Joel’s torturing his friend. I’m not a big fan of it.

I’m gonna try and avoid it if I can next time, because you can absolutely knock people out. You’re giving them a concussion. You can knock them out. You can also just kill them by giving them a subdural hematoma that just swells in their brain and then kills them. You can do all sorts of stuff. You can fracture their skull. It’s a terrible way of knocking somebody out. You shouldn’t do it. Nobody should be knocking anybody out.

If you hit somebody hard in the back of the head, first of all, you may not knock them out at all. You may cause brain damage, and especially if you’re hitting somebody in the back of the head. You could blind them. There’s all sorts of terrible things that can happen. It is not something you should do. I’m gonna try as best I can to avoid people hitting people on the back of the head with the stocks of guns for Season 2, but Season 3 will be nothing but that, just one after another.

**John:** All head injuries. They’ll suffer the consequences of those head injuries. That’s gonna be the real change. That’s gonna be the shocking revelation there. Craig, thank you for your answer there, because I suspect that there was a debate there, because you’re so concerned about portrayals of things in the real world.

As I was looking at the scene, I was thinking, okay, because a thing happens before that, there’s other ways you could’ve gotten that one character knocked out, and yet this made sense for the characters in that world and in that moment. [Crosstalk 01:17:39].

**Craig:** It made sense, but it’s not great. When we play DnD, as you know, if you are attacking someone and you don’t want to kill them, you want to leave them just alive enough to interrogate them, all you have to do is say to the DM, “I want to deliver a non-lethal blow here.” If it takes them to 0 HP, they don’t die, they’re alive, you can interrogate them. In this case, this was not that. The guys that came up, they didn’t know who Joel was. They were like, “We’re gonna knock you out, and if you die, you die. If you don’t, we’ll be able to ask you questions. Either way, it’s fine.”

**John:** Exactly. There was a movie I’ve really liked recently where the central character I think is knocked over the head three times, knocked out over the head three times. I was like, “She’s paralyzed now. I don’t think she’s coming back and fighting for victory here.” I loved the movie, but that was a thing that [crosstalk 01:18:27].

**Craig:** You gotta stop hitting people on the head. I agree. To the extent that we have contributed to the head hitting, I apologize to all of culture.

**John:** Nice.

**Craig:** I’ve got a colonoscopy coming up. I’m gonna try and take notes. I don’t remember. I’m just gone.

**John:** You can ask them. You can ask them. You can tell them, “I’m an absolute pro at this. You can give me less.” Maybe not, because they don’t want you talking.

**Craig:** Oh, no no no, I’m not gonna ever say that. Ever. Ever. I’m a baby. You want to run a garden hose up my butt? Do it. I don’t want to feel it. I don’t want to be awake. I don’t want to know about it. Just do the garden hose. It’s not a garden hose, by the way. It’s incredibly slender.

**John:** It’s slender. It’s fine. People may way, way, way too big a deal of colonoscopies. They’re fine.

**Craig:** All they do is save your life. That’s all they do.

**John:** That’s all they do. Easiest thing you could do to save your life.

**Craig:** Get a colonoscopy, people. Thanks, guys.

**John:** Thanks, Craig. Thanks, Drew.

**Drew:** Bye.

**Craig:** Bye.

**John:** Bye.

Links:

* [Has Anyone Ever Actually Tied a Damsel in Distress to a Railway Track?](https://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2019/01/has-anyone-ever-actually-tied-a-damsel-in-distress-to-a-railway-track/) by Karl Smallwood
* [Pirating the Oscars 2023: The Final Curtain Call](https://waxy.org/2023/03/pirating-the-oscars-2023-the-final-curtain-call/) by Andy Baio
* [Why Are All Action Heroes Named Jack, James, or John?](https://slate.com/culture/2023/03/john-wick-james-bond-action-heroes-j-names.html) by Demetria Glace for Slate
* Follow along with our Three Page Challenge Selections: [Flotsam](https://johnaugust.com/index.php?gf-download=2023%2F01%2FSam-Darcy_FLOTSAM_Three-Page-Challenge.pdf&form-id=1&field-id=4&hash=0ef4e278ecbe1687ad1a36c0a96f0e3b01a8d282ed17845879114ca368c0cfcd) by Sam Darcy, [Sockfoot](https://johnaugust.com/index.php?gf-download=2022%2F12%2FSockfoot.pdf&form-id=1&field-id=4&hash=bb72643a11a5d302f96bbc96947d57ffcd0f01f96147767cb10acca002f51e59) by Jesse Allard, and [Spark](https://johnaugust.com/index.php?gf-download=2022%2F12%2FSpark_ScriptNotes_ThreePageChallenge.pdf&form-id=1&field-id=4&hash=2781befc01a890bfd2e53921356d178f96a1486a558300228375a8808edcf804) by Rachel Thomas
* [Pijja Palace](https://www.pijjapalace.com/)
* [how I found the ‘so no head’ vine road in 15 minutes](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfdwjleF7nY) by RAINBOLT
* [Get a Scriptnotes T-shirt!](https://cottonbureau.com/people/scriptnotes-podcast)
* [Check out the Inneresting Newsletter](https://inneresting.substack.com/)
* [Gift a Scriptnotes Subscription](https://scriptnotes.supportingcast.fm/gifts) or [treat yourself to a premium subscription!](https://scriptnotes.supportingcast.fm/)
* [Craig Mazin](https://www.instagram.com/clmazin/) on Instagram
* [John August](https://twitter.com/johnaugust) on Twitter
* [John on Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/johnaugust/?hl=en)
* [John on Mastodon](https://mastodon.art/@johnaugust)
* [Outro](http://johnaugust.com/2013/scriptnotes-the-outros) by Richie Molyneux ([send us yours!](http://johnaugust.com/2014/outros-needed))
* Scriptnotes is produced by [Drew Marquardt](https://www.instagram.com/marquardtam/) and edited by [Matthew Chilelli](https://twitter.com/machelli).

Email us at ask@johnaugust.com

You can download the episode [here](http://traffic.libsyn.com/scriptnotes/592standard.mp3).

Scriptnotes, Episode 591: Collective Narratives, Transcript

April 27, 2023 News, Scriptnotes Transcript

The original post for this episode can be found [here](https://johnaugust.com/2023/collective-narratives).

**John August:** Hello and welcome. My name is John August.

**Craig Mazin:** My name is Craig Mazin.

**John:** This is Episode 591 of Scriptnotes, a podcast about screenwriting and things that are interesting to screenwriters. Today on the show, how do we establish what happened in the world before the movie began? We’ll look at collective narratives and ways to get the audience up to speed. We’ll also discuss getting staffed and joining the WGA. To help us do all that, we welcome back our beloved Scriptnotes producer, Megana Rao. Welcome back.

**Craig:** Yay!

**John:** Woohoo!

**Megana Rao:** Hello.

**Craig:** Aw. Hi.

**Megana:** I’m feeling very shy.

**John:** Suddenly she’s shy.

**Craig:** Nothing’s changed. You’ve done this so many times. You’re good. You’re doing great.

**John:** She’s like the kid running around all over the living room before the guests come over, and the guests come into the living room and they hide back behind their parents.

**Megana:** Yeah, exactly.

**Craig:** You’re doing great.

**John:** Megana, we lost you because you went off to work on a television show, a Netflix comedy.

**Megana:** Yes.

**John:** On a scale of 1 to 14, how has it been working on this Netflix show so far?

**Megana:** It has been so fun. It absolutely rocks. I’m not saying that in a way… I don’t want anyone’s feelings to be hurt, but I’m having a great time.

**Craig:** Our feelings are certainly not hurt, although what were the odds that Megana was going to describe her current job as a 1 out of 14?

**John:** Exactly, like, “Oh, it’s absolutely torture, and all the people in the room who listen to this podcast, they need to know that it’s absolutely the worst.”

**Megana:** No, it’s the greatest. My head hurts from laughing so much every day.

**Craig:** Oh, wow.

**John:** It’s gotta be a huge adjustment though too, because generally, it’s been you and me or you and me and Nima, who comes in the office, and now you’re suddenly around a bunch of people all day. Has that been a huge adjustment for you?

**Megana:** Definitely. It went from quiet time with just you and me sitting next to each other in the office to around a dozen people just doing jokes and bits all day, talking nonstop.

**John:** Wow. Megana, in our Bonus Segment, because you’re coming back, I wanted to give you carte blanche to whatever you would like to do for a Bonus Segment. Do you have any thoughts about what you want to do for a Bonus Segment for this one?

**Megana:** Yes. I recently downloaded TikTok and have gotten sucked into get ready with me videos, which I believe you’re also familiar with, hashtag #grwm. I wanted to talk about those.

**John:** Fantastic. We are so unprepared to talk about getting ready with me, but you can get us ready for it by talking us through what we need to know about-

**Craig:** No idea what’s going on.

**John:** … getting ready with me.

**Megana:** Wait, really? You guys aren’t watching these?

**Craig:** Weirdly, no.

**John:** I have a sense of what I think they are. You’ll tell us. Our Premium members can listen in as we get up to speed with where Megana is already at in terms of getting ready with me videos.

**Megana:** Great.

**John:** Awesome. Some news, folks. The WGA Awards happened. It’s this past weekend as we recorded. It’s two weekends ago. No surprise that Everything Everywhere All At Once and Women Talking, two of the features that we had the filmmakers on to talk about, won first place, because that’s what we do. We pick the winners.

**Craig:** I really wish you hadn’t said that, because now we’re going to get more emails from more PR people.

**John:** You know whose problem that is? It’s Drew’s problem.

**Drew Marquardt:** It’s my problem.

**John:** It’s no longer Megana’s problem.

**Craig:** It’s Drew’s problem now. That’s wonderful, as long as it’s not our problem, although it is. We get them.

**John:** We get them too.

**Craig:** We do. Congratulations to Sarah and the Daniels. Very exciting. Listen, I don’t want to handicap anything. I’m not an Oscars expert or a pro or anything like that, but it sure looks good for Everything Everywhere All At Once going into the final weekend here, because the Oscars are coming up this weekend.

**John:** They will already have happened by the time people are listening to this. You’ll know whether Craig was wrong or was right. I think he’s probably right.

**Craig:** I feel like I am, but no one’s going to be watching the Oscars, because it’s the finale of The Last of Us, so oh well.

**John:** Good timing there. Good planning.

**Craig:** Sorry, Oscars. Sorry.

**John:** Megana, do you have any advice for Drew as he deals with the onslaught of publicists who are going to be asking for a prime spot on Scriptnotes?

**Megana:** Unfortunately, we don’t take solicitations for guests. It’s tough that we have this policy, because there’s a lot of cool guests that are being pitched out there. You two actually end up bringing on most of the guests that you’re interested in talking to.

**John:** In general, if there’s somebody who we’re really fascinated by, we’ll just reach out to them, and they’ll say yes. Occasionally, we have to go through a publicist. Back in the day, we used to go to Twitter, but now I guess it’ll have to be Instagram. I’ll reach out on Instagram and find these folks or Craig will meet them somewhere.

**Craig:** I don’t want people to feel bad, like if we haven’t had you on the show, it means we don’t think you’re fascinating. That’s not true. The other thing that I do say to people all the time, because it is true, is that we’re not really that show. We’re not a guest chat show. We’re a John and Craig talk about things that are interesting to screenwriters show, and occasionally, we’ll bring someone else into our marriage to spice it up a touch. Mostly, we’re monogamous. That’s kind of how we are.

**John:** If you’re a publicist who has terrific clients, there are so many great venues for you to be bringing those clients. Scriptnotes won’t be one of them, but that’s okay, because there’s lots of other great podcasts out there who will be happy to have them. Megana, we have you here only for a short time, so I want to make sure we get the most value out of your time here with us.

We have talked to previous guests about getting staffed. We talked to Ryan Knighton. We talked to Jack Schaefer about running a room. We talked to Megan McDonald, your predecessor, when she got staffed.

I want to talk about that transition period, because there was a time when you were taking a lot of meetings. You were just taking a lot of meetings and going out and meeting with people. What was that like? What was the process? You get the call saying, “There’s this show. They’re interested in you.” Then you’d have to get up to speed. How did you get the call? What prep did you do? It was a couple of months of work on some of these, and some of them happened really quickly.

**Megana:** I don’t think it was a couple of months on any of them. I feel like with lower-level positions, it happens really quickly. It’s week off. This one happened to be less than 24 hours notice before I went in for the interview.

**Craig:** Wow.

**John:** Let’s talk through going in for the interview before you get there. What is the call or the email from your rep saying, “Hey, there’s this show.” What are they telling you about it? What are you reading? What are you watching?

**Megana:** Somehow, for this show, my sample got passed to this showrunner, but my agent didn’t formally submit me for this role. In tracing back how it all came together, I’m actually not quite sure.

**Craig:** Wouldn’t it be great if this is where Megana found out that we did it?

**John:** Behind the scenes.

**Craig:** We just quietly paid them off.

**John:** It was us.

**Craig:** We’re like, “Listen. Megana-“

**Megana:** “We have had enough.”

**Craig:** “She needs to go. She’ll sit in the room. She’s not going to write anything. Don’t worry about it. She’ll just laugh. She’s great.”

**Megana:** “She’ll just giggle.”

**Craig:** “She’ll just giggle. Then just send her home. For God’s sake, she’s gotta go.”

**Megana:** Did you guys actually do that?

**Craig:** Yeah, we did that.

**John:** No, that’s not true at all.

**Craig:** No, it’s what happened.

**John:** There was a friend of ours in college who our ongoing bit with her was that her parents were paying us to be her friend.

**Craig:** Aw.

**John:** Whenever she’s like, “You’re being mean to me,” it’s like, “Your parents’ check didn’t clear.”

**Craig:** Wait, we have to explain to them what checks are.

**John:** Here’s a good tie-in to that. Megana, literally the day before you got staffed on the show, you were in the office and we were talking about what a check was. You had a revelation about something you had never realized before about checks. Is that correct?

**Megana:** Yes, but I’ve already forgotten what it was. There’s a form on the back of checks, and you’re supposed to do something with it.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Good lord. You endorse it.

**John:** You endorse it. You sign it for a deposit or for deposit only. That was a new thing for checks for you.

**Megana:** What happens if you don’t do it? Because I’ve never done that for the three checks I’ve written.

**John:** I think it actually doesn’t matter anymore, because now you’re just putting the thing on the ATM, and so it doesn’t matter.

**Megana:** Got it.

**John:** Technically, you should be doing that.

**Craig:** There was a while where I never did it. Then with the advent of digital deposits, where you take a picture of your check, the algorithm needs you to sign the back of it or it kicks it back at you, so we’re back to it.

**Megana:** The other thing I didn’t realize is that checks were numbered. That was the big surprise.

**John:** That was a big one. I wanted you to say it rather than me say it.

**Craig:** What?

**John:** The checks are numbered sequentially.

**Craig:** What? You didn’t notice that there was a number on each check that got bigger with each check that you went through?

**Megana:** Craig, there are a lot of numbers on checks, and I don’t go through checks.

**Craig:** First of all, how dare you? You have to come at this with some humility, because that’s crazy.

**Megana:** I don’t know if you’ve ever seen a check before, but there’s-

**Craig:** There are a lot of numbers on it. I’m like, “Oh yeah, you’re making a great point.” Wait, no, you’re not, because all the numbers on the bottom of a check are in that weird check font, but then there’s a normal font in the top right, or that’s usually where it is, which is just a four-digit number. John, are we-

**John:** Old? Yeah.

**Craig:** God.

**John:** She grew up in a time when checks were just no longer a thing. They’re not a thing now. There was never a period where she needed to worry about a checkbook and the sense of, “Oh, did I grab the right checkbook?” It doesn’t matter, because she never had to deal with it.

**Craig:** Did you have the same experience that I did, John, in high school, where we took half a semester in some class that was like home ec? I don’t know what else you would call it. It was learning how to write checks and keep track of them in the white parts of the checkbook that no one ever uses except old, old, old people.

**Megana:** Aw.

**Craig:** I know. Aw, we’re cute.

**John:** I think it was part of our math unit. I think it was just built into basically that.

**Craig:** That’s awesome.

**John:** I think we were explained what a mortgage was.

**Craig:** You get to pause on math and then they just make you do checks?

**John:** Probably math.

**Craig:** That’s crazy.

**John:** Also, they shoved logic into the geometry section. They’d have to find a place to do it.

**Craig:** Technically, geometry does require proofs and theorems.

**John:** It’s logic.

**Craig:** A lot of logic. I don’t really think they shoved it in there. I’m going to challenge you on that.

**John:** We’ll see.

**Craig:** I’m fighting today. I’m fighting everyone.

**John:** How would we find the answer to this? Where is the source of truth people go back to? What was the curriculum in Fairview High School in 1987? Who can find that out? If you’re a listener who could tell me when I learned about checks, that would be fantastic.

More crucially for screenwriter issues, I want to get back to, in general, Megana, as you were hearing about a show, your reps were trying to set up a showrunner meeting with you on the show, what are they sending you? What kind of prep can you do for that?

**Megana:** Typically, I would get at least a pilot script, maybe a couple of other scripts, and a little blurb that my agent would send with a log line and a little synopsis of where the season was going. Oftentimes, that’s been it.

**John:** Do they give you some sense of why they’re meeting with you? Is there a specific role they might be looking for you for, like, “We need a funny person.” Because talking with showrunners, it seems like sometimes they’re casting rooms to make sure, like, “We need somebody who’s really good at mysteries. We need somebody who’s good at structuring a one-hour show, someone with this kind of experience.” Do they give you a sense of why they’re meeting with you, or just you’re on their list?

**Megana:** I’ve never really had that information beforehand. I’ve tried to come up with a pitch based off of those materials, but typically, I don’t think so.

**John:** You’ve had a little bit of time to prep. You’re going in and meeting. Are you actually going in meeting somebody, or is it all just Zooms at this point?

**Megana:** My interview was in person, and the room’s in person, which I am so thrilled about.

**John:** That’s great. Has that been typical for all the showrunner meetings you’ve been taking over the last couple months?

**Megana:** No, I think this is the first one. In the past few months, it’s been like, “Hopefully, we would do something in person or hybrid if possible,” but this is the first one that’s been like, “Nope, we’re definitely physically here.”

**Craig:** Do you feel the love being in person? I certainly prefer it, but I know that that’s been the way it’s always been with me, that people I’ve worked with have been in the room, and then there was this brief interruption. For you, since you haven’t had the experience of a writing room really until now, does it feel good knowing that you’re there in person or is it a 50/50?

**Megana:** I’m so happy that we’re in person. Everyone in this room has had prior relationships with each other. I can’t imagine coming into this room over Zoom and not having the ability to make small talk on the way up the stairs or in the coffee room. I just think it’s been hugely important. Also, the energy of being there together is not something that you can easily replicate.

**John:** Especially for a comedy. It’s a sense of was that funny in the moment, was it funny in the room, did it actually land. I feel like that’s much more important for something like this. If you’re doing a very structured procedural, it may not be as important that you all physically be in the same space, because it’s not going to have the same vie.

**Megana:** Totally. I think I didn’t appreciate how much of the job is just reading body language. You just can’t do that over Zoom in the same way.

**John:** A thing we’ve heard from a bunch of showrunners and also previous staff writers on the podcast is that it’s hard when you’re first in a room to know when to speak up, when to stay quiet, what the first thing is you should actually say, the first pitch you should give. Is that the experience you’ve found? What was it like based on your prior expectations based on Scriptnotes versus being there in person?

**Megana:** I don’t know. I guess I’m still figuring it out. Luckily, my showrunner is very into mentoring, so I have felt very supported through this process. I think it’s certainly something I’m still navigating.

**John:** A question we often get is, if you are a staff writer in this room, on a daily basis what are you actually writing? Are you taking notes? Are you doing anything, or is it just entirely your brain, and you’re talking in the room? Is there anything that you are actually physically writing at this point?

**Megana:** It’s mostly talking, but we’ve recently started working on outlines.

**John:** That’s exciting. You said there were maybe a dozen people in a room. Does that include support staff? Because we obviously talked a lot about support staff on this podcast. Who’s in the room on a supporting level, who’s not a writer?

**Megana:** There’s a script coordinator and a writing assistant.

**John:** Are they just there to physically write stuff down and move stuff around, or are they contributing as well? Are they speaking up, or are they mostly there to make sure everyone else is facilitated?

**Megana:** Both. They’re definitely speaking and contributing. The room is just so many whiteboards.

**Craig:** You don’t want to give anything identifying here in terms of size, but is there ever any frustration, asks the guy who works alone, with either some people talking too much, some people never talking, having something to say but waiting and then it’s too late and then we’ve moved on? How do you deal with the frustration of a large group of people talking about something?

**Megana:** I don’t think I really have to deal with the frustration of it, but a lot of these people are very seasoned writers, and there’s a certain pace and momentum that they just understand. The showrunner is so great, because he’s really responsive to what everyone says, but he’s also very clear on the direction that he’s looking for, the types of things that he’s looking for.

**John:** It also helps that you’re not coming in from scratch. There’s already a sense of what this show is or at least what the show is supposed to be. You didn’t come in on day one of this. That also helps a little bit too, that there’s some sort of structure, a sense of what this is that you’re trying to make.

**Megana:** Totally.

**John:** Megana, when I took you out to celebrate getting staffed on a show, one of the things [inaudible 00:15:19] you can potentially be joining the WGA based on this show, based on staffing on this show, which would be so exciting, because we’d get another WGA member in our fold. I realized that we’ve never actually talked on the podcast, or at least not recently, in 591 episodes, about the actual point system it takes to join the WGA, because it’s not just a club that you sign up for you. You actually have to qualify to join.

**Megana:** I had no idea how any of this worked.

**Craig:** Few do. Few do. This is arcane knowledge that only the oldest of wizards and witches know about. You know when Gandalf goes to research the ring and he goes into that super old library and finds some scroll and he’s reading and goes, “Oh,” and then he’s running back? That’s me.

**John:** You are the old scroll.

**Craig:** There’s somebody on Twitter who was doing the thing that people do on Twitter, professing his great knowledge about the screenwriting world, as often. One of the things he said was, “A lot of people don’t know that just because you sell your spec script, that doesn’t mean that you automatically become a WGA member.” Yeah, it does. Then I was like, “Okay, I don’t know where the misconception is,” but let’s talk through how it actually works, because it’s weird.

The way it works is there’s units. To become a full-fledged, current, active member of the Writers Guild of America West, you need to get 24 units at a minimum. You have 3 years to accrue those 24 units, or the ones that start to expire, basically. You need to figure out how to get your 24 units in within 3 years, at which point, hooray, you’re a member. The thing about selling a screenplay, if you sell a screenplay for a feature length theatrical motion picture, boom, 24 units, you’re done. Welcome to the Guild.

**John:** Craig, I want to raise one potential hand here. In theory, someone who’s not a WGA member, could sell a spec screenplay to a company through their nonsignatory arm and not join through that. There’s ways I’m sure this had happened in the past, where someone has sold a thing and it’s not happened for them.

**Craig:** If you sell a screenplay to a nonsignatory, you get zero units, and may God have mercy on your soul. What he specifically said was you have to sell your script, and then you have to do another pass on it. That is not the case, although you weren’t guaranteed another pass on it. It’s part of our deal. The tiniest amount of units is two.

I think this is the way a lot of people get into the Guild. Each complete week of employment within the Guild’s jurisdiction on a week-to-week basis gets you two units. If you’re hired as a staffer on a show, and you are in the room, covered by your employment deal for 12 weeks, boom, Writers Guild. You’re in. That’s 24 units.

**John:** That’s the way it helps for Megana.

**Craig:** Indeed.

**John:** She’s accruing two units per week.

**Craig:** Two units per week. There’s lots of things in between writing a story only, writing a short film, writing a radio play less than 30 minutes, shall be prorated in 5-minute increments. These rules have been around for a long… Like I said, Gandalf in the library.

**John:** You can tell these are old.

**Craig:** The story for a TV program of less than 30 minutes, again, prorated in increments of 10 minutes or less. I think it should be 10 minutes or fewer. In any case, there are lots of subdivisions, but the point is, the way most people get into the Guild is either through selling a screenplay for a feature film or working week to week as a staffer and getting those 12 weeks under their belt, at which point the Guild calls you and says, “You owe us money.”

**John:** That’s one of the exciting calls you love to get. Craig, I got into the Guild because I was hired to write a feature screenplay, which is 24 units of credit, for How to Eat Fried Worms. It was for [inaudible 00:19:22] Pictures, which is a Guild signatory. I got the message from the WGA saying, “Hey, congratulations. You are now eligible and must join the Guild and the pay $3,500.” It was some pretty significant fee to join. Then you are in the Writers Guild, and you’re there for good until you could go post-current at some point. You were then in the Writers Guild and you are fully a member thereof. Craig, what was your thing that got you in?

**Craig:** I was the same. With a writing partner of mine, we sold an original screenplay idea to Disney, and we were hired to write the screenplay. Of note, both of us immediately accrued 24 units. It wasn’t like they spread the units, 12 and 12.

I have never had a faster call in my life from a union. I don’t know how they found me. It was like seconds went by, and then suddenly the phone rang, and then they were like, “Hey, kid.” There was a woman who used to run that department. I can’t quite remember her name. She was a very nice lady, but older. It was like they sent the tough lady after you, like, “Listen, kid, you owe us money.” I was like, “Okay, great.”

What was funny at the time, of course, was LOL, I hadn’t gotten paid anything, and neither had my writing partner. We both owed each the full initiation fee. I was like, “I’m out of money now. I don’t have any money. I just gave it all to the Writers Guild. This is going great so far.”

Obviously, all said and done, a fine thing to get into the union. You just have to be ready and prepared, particularly if you’re endeavoring to get into the Writers Guild. If you want to be optimistic, and I think you should, sock the initiation fee away. What is it, $2,500?

**Megana:** Mm-hmm.

**John:** I think so.

**Craig:** Sock that away. You’ll need it.

**Megana:** The one funny thing in the communication is that it was like, this assumes that you live West of the Mississippi River. I was like, “I’ve never thought about where I live in those terms.”

**Craig:** Unfortunately, we have two Writers Guilds. Ask me why, Megana. Ask me why.

**Megana:** I can tell you’re in a fighting mood-

**Craig:** Do it. Do it.

**Megana:** … which is why we don’t record evenings.

**Craig:** Ask me. Ask me.

**Megana:** Craig, why do we have two unions on opposite sides of the Mississippi?

**Craig:** Because we’re dumb. We are dumb. We weren’t dumb. Back in the old days, the business was divided between New York and Los Angeles. New York handled a lot of television, and Los Angeles handled a lot of other stuff. New York in particular handled all the news and stuff like this. Then shortly thereafter, everything just ended up in LA, but we still kept this weird, archaic structure, where we have the Writers Guild East and the Writers Guild West.

We negotiate together. We have the same minimum basic agreement. There’s no reason to have two unions. It’s all so stupid. For the love of God, they were able to put Berlin back together. The dividing line between the East and the West per chain-smoking, bourbon lunch drinking from 1943 was the Mississippi River. I’m sure it was a difficult compromise to make. It’s so silly.

By the way, anybody in the Writers Guild West can, by choice, join the Writers Guild East, and vice versa. It’s just so stupid. I’m glad you asked, Megana. I’m glad you asked.

**Megana:** I’m not.

**Craig:** You asked.

**John:** Just to close out the topic, let’s say you were hired to do a rewrite, not to do a full first draft. That would count for one half that number of credits. A polish is one quarter. An option can do a thing, which I’ve never heard of somebody getting into the Guild through options, but theoretically it’s possible. We’ll put a link in the show notes to the full explanation of things. Megana, I’m curious, because you said that you got this email. Did you get an email from the Guild saying, “Hey, this is your path to joining the Guild.”

**Megana:** Yes. They were like, “So-and-so has told us that they’ve employed you,” and then this big email with lots of attachments.

**Craig:** We got our eye on you, kid.

**John:** In the case of Megana, she’s working on a Netflix show. There is a thing called a work list. Every week, the employers have to report who is writing for them. Craig, they could’ve found you through a work list, but they also could’ve just found you through Variety. There’s some article that you sold a thing.

**Craig:** I don’t know. They were on it fast.

**John:** Love it. I love that kind of efficiency. I want to get to our marquee topic here. I am writing something right now that is set in 1962. I say 1962, you think, oh, it’s the ‘60s, but really 1962 is not the ‘60s. It’s sort of more the ‘50s.

We have this desire to decade-ize time, and things don’t fit nicely. Yet it’s so helpful that we can talk about the ‘40s, the ‘50s, the ‘60s, the ‘70s, and have an image of what it is we’re talking about. There’s a shared collective understanding of like, we don’t have to agree on exactly what happened in that decade, but we can at least agree on what everyone thinks about that decade. If I say it feels like the ‘70s, we get a sense of what that is.

I’ll put a link in the show notes to this article by Noah Smith, who’s talking about conceiving the 2000s. Weirdly, the 2000s and the 2010s, I don’t feel like we do have a good sense of what those are like. We haven’t decided on a collective narrative for what those feel like. There’s moments in there that we can point to. Even when we were living in the ‘90s, I think we could point to the ‘80s and say, “Oh, that feels very ‘80s.” It’s hard for me to say, “Oh, that feels very 2000s,” or it feels very 2010s. We haven’t found a good collective narrative about what those decades are like.

I thought we might talk about why collective narratives like that are useful for screenwriters in framing things in real world things, but also important for establishing collective narratives for the characters inside your world, if you’re creating a world from scratch, because we look at fictional worlds, like what happened with the Snap at MCU or how the robots came out sentient in the Terminator universe. The characters in that world know that stuff, but we have to tell the audience all the stuff that normal characters in that world might know. I thought we’d spend a few minutes talking about both why it’s important and how we establish those things in the fiction worlds they’re creating.

**Craig:** You’ve got to start, I guess, with culture. It seems weirdly as we are creating culture, we are studying culture, and the snake eats its own tail, as the uroboros [uh-RAH-boo-ruhs] does. That’s right, I said uroboros [uh-RAH-boo-ruhs].

**John:** I would say ouroboros [or-uh-BOR-ohs]. You say uroboros [uh-RAH-boo-ruhs]?

**Craig:** I think it’s uroboros [uh-RAH-boo-ruhs]. I don’t it’s ouroboros [OR-oh-BOR-uhs], because that would be… It might be.

**John:** I think I’ve heard it said ouroboros [or-uh-BOR-ohs] though.

**Craig:** Here we go.

**John:** I’m not sure.

**Craig:** Hey Siri, how do you pronounce uroboros [uh-RAH-boo-ruhs]? It said, “How to pronounce Robert Henry Rose.” I guess I should realize that that was going to happen, because if I’m mispronouncing it, then it won’t know. If I’m pronouncing it correctly, I didn’t need to ask. I’m going to the dictionary.

**Drew:** Google says uroboros [yur-oh-BOR-uhs].

**John:** I was close though.

**Drew:** You were close.

**Craig:** That’s really close.

**John:** Uroboros [yur-oh-BOR-uhs].

**Craig:** I’m going to give that to you. I think that you’re right, because you said ouroboros [or-ruh-BOR-ohs], but the adding of the Y, that’s insignificant compared to my uroboros [uh-RAH-boo-ruhs], which is just wrong. Uroboros [yur-oh-BOR-uhs].

**John:** Uroboros [yur-oh-BOR-uhs].

**Craig:** The nature of the uroboros, we obsess over pop culture and/or just regular culture, high culture, low, it doesn’t matter, as signposts for the world around us. Clothing is maybe the most immediate thing that we think of. Then music is a hot second right behind clothing.

**John:** Definitely.

**Craig:** Hair is right there in third place. Then in fourth place you will often see fads, the things that captivated culture at a time. In the 2000s, for instance… Were Tamagotchi big in the early 2000s?

**Megana:** That feels like ‘90s.

**Craig:** Late ‘90s.

**Drew:** It’s the late ‘90s.

**Craig:** That feels like ‘90s. Something that just comes along where people are like, “Oh my god,” obsess over something from 2003. That sort of thing paints this broad sense of where we are.

More than anything else, I suppose the other thing we do draw from are these main historical events. It seems like in half of the movies about the ‘60s, somebody will run into a room and go, “Did you hear about John F. Kennedy’s been shot?” He gets shot constantly in those movies. That’s understandable. Makes sense.

**Megana:** It’s interesting in the examples that Craig brought up, I would associate most of those things with teen culture, but teens, I don’t know, they’re not typically creating culture. They’re responding to it.

**John:** I think teens are often creating culture. I think stuff does bubble up there, because Craig’s examples were fashion, music, and hair, but if you think about the decades that we can actually distinctly remember, it’s when those three things intersected. ‘90s, you have grunge. ‘80s, you have hair metal. You also have ‘80s fashion. ‘70s, we have a look. ‘60s, ‘70s, we have the hippies. Again, music, fashion. ‘50s, the Beatles. We have all these things that are gathered together. It’s that perfect storm. It’s really teens who are creating that culture.

Beyond just the culture, what this space feels like, there’s a sense of a shared story about how we got to this place. We have a collective narrative about the fall of Roman Empire. We don’t need to know the details. It’s just like, oh, the Roman Empire got really big, and then it collapsed.

**Craig:** Too big.

**John:** Too big.

**Craig:** Too big.

**John:** Too big. Got too big, got too spread out, the fall, fiddling while it all burned. We have a sense of a collective story about how the first peoples arrived in North America. That’s the crossing of the land bridge. We don’t need to know the dates of it. We just know that essentially the land was pretty empty and then a bunch of peoples crossed over the land bridge from Alaska, spread out over the whole North and South America and Central America, and that’s how people got here.

Those are helpful things that we can assume that anybody watching our stories would understand. We wouldn’t have to explain those to people. Yet if we were doing a fictional world… Need to explain the Empire or the Federation in Star Wars or Star Trek. You gotta be doing some work there to get up to speed, where any character within that world would already know that stuff.

**Craig:** Knowing things and figuring out what your audience knows is actually trickier than you think, especially the older you get. One of the things that happens as we get older is we start to take for granted that people know stuff that we know that they don’t, and similarly-

**John:** That the checks have numbers on them.

**Craig:** Correct. Conversely, there’s a whole bunch of stuff we don’t know, and we don’t know that we don’t know it. That’s how you become out of touch. That’s how your references get dated. That’s also how you make missteps and incorrect assumptions. What we assume about what the audience knows is essential. Otherwise, we are either wasting time telling them stuff they already do or we are presuming they know things that they don’t, and they just won’t understand what’s going on.

**Megana:** As you were talking, I was thinking about, Chernobyl is obviously so rooted in time and place, but actually, so is The Last of Us, because it’s 2003.

**Craig:** There is a genre of frozen in time, where the world stops and everything stops at a kind of time period. It is interesting, 2003. We were a little short on fads and things like that. In terms of the technology…

I guess technology is also now a huge one, not so much before, but now, because it changes so rapidly, what kind of phone were people using, and what did the cars look like and what did the radios in the cars look like, and even the fact that there is a radio. All those things were frozen in time and do help mark where you are as you’re going through. Then of course everything decays and turns into its own vibe.

**Megana:** I also remember, John, once, I think very early on when I was working with you, you were working on a project that was set in the ‘50s, and you and I made a timeline of when different things happen and trying to map out what the social cultural attitudes towards these things were, and that was shocking.

**John:** I think that’s important to do, because you need to understand what the baseline of it was and the characters in that time period, what they thought, and also always remembering what people now think about that time period. I think when there’s a mismatch there, you can actually create some good cultural moments.

I think the movie Hidden Figures is a great example. We have a sense of what the role of Black women was in that time period, we have a sense of what getting a man on the moon was like, but we didn’t have a sense that those two things were related. We didn’t have a sense that there were Black women who were involved in NASA’s work there at that time. That’s exciting when you can find those moments that both use people’s cultural narratives, a collective narrative we have about that time period, and can push beyond it, show an attitude that was different.

I think Chernobyl did a great job of that also, because we have a sense of what Chernobyl was, this moment that happened, but Craig was able to fill in details that people would’ve never known about what was going on there. Talk about uroboros. Craig’s show not only exposes things, but really changed people’s cultural expectation of what Chernobyl was, because it became the narrative of what Chernobyl was. For better or worse, just like we were going to think that the Titanic sank the same way that James Cameron showed us, because that’s the biggest cultural marker we have for that event.

**Craig:** If you can find some undermined cultural territory for collective narratives, that’s always exciting, not only showing the flip side of things that we know, but even just general… I think Mad Men was so interesting, because they were like, “You know what we’re going to do? We’re going to do the early ‘60s, which actually no one thinks about,” because as you put, when you would say, “What were the ‘60s like?” “Hippies. Boom, it’s hippies. Let’s go.” Actually-

**John:** That’s late.

**Craig:** That’s late ‘60s and early ‘70s. The early ‘60s, they’re not the ‘50s. It’s not poodle skirts. It’s not Grease. It’s this other weird thing. Mad Men just went, “Oh, there’s this fun little hinge point between regressive and progressive society and major change versus stagnation. We’re going to just sit right in the middle there and find this other little special spot.” That was exciting, because honestly, a lot of people, myself included, I’d never really considered that time as a thing, but it is a thing.

**John:** Once we have Mad Men, then we can use that as a jumping off point for other things that are around that same time. X-Men: First Class would’ve had a harder time explaining itself if we didn’t have Mad Men, I think, as a reference back to us. Also, this thing I’m working on right now in 1962, Mad Men is a useful reference for it. Not that Mad Men has to stand in for everything, but at least we can visually see that’s the feel we’re going for.

Let’s talk about when we have to establish the collective narrative of a place in time that is not just strictly our decades. I’m thinking about fictional universes or we’ve made a big change in the universe.

A couple different techniques you might want to use. The first is brute force. We’ve seen things that start with “once upon a time.” They’re just going to lay it out for you, like, “This is what you need to know about our world for this all to make sense.”

The Star Wars opening crawl is basically a once upon a time. It’s just like, “You gotta get up to speed here. Go with us here. Trust us as you’re reading this thing for two minutes, and then it’ll be worth your while to go through it.”

Buffy the Vampire Slayer opening credits, “In every generation, a slayer is born,” establishing this is the premise, that there’s a history to this moment that was here from before.

**Megana:** I think one other different category off of that is something like The Watchmen or For All Mankind, where they’re using collective narratives to introduce us to a world that’s slightly different. Would you call it science fiction, alternative?

**Craig:** Yeah, alternative history. That’s a whole category where they’ll reference President Robert Redford, be like, “It’s our world, but it’s not our world. It’s an alternate version of history,” and helping people figure out, okay, so there was a Vietnam War, but in this world, America won, and how would that go? That’s a good way of orienting people into your new collective narrative, your ultimate historical collective narrative.

**John:** It seems important that you would have to introduce some of those elements quite early on, so the audience knows that it’s not just our universe, because you could probably do it at the end of the first episode or something like that, or a ways in, but at a certain point it’s going to feel like a betrayal if you didn’t reveal it was a different universe pretty early on.

**Craig:** Do they not know that Robert Redford wasn’t the president? Maybe they don’t know. They don’t know. I’m going to write a stern letter.

**John:** Those numbers in the corner of checks, what are those for?

**Craig:** Yeah, what are those?

**John:** Another way, if you’re creating a fictional universe or having to really change the collective narrative of something is to explain to an outsider or to a newcomer. You see this in a lot of things. Indiana Jones, he is explaining to somebody who is not an archeologist the important things to understand about this culture, this thing, these rules of this universe.

The Matrix works that same way too, where Neo is an outsider being introduced to the truth behind The Matrix. He’s a convenient place to exposition dump upon. We’ve talked about The Matrix a lot. It’s a good example of a movie that starts in a mostly real world and then has to bring the character through the looking glass into the other side.

Lastly, I would say that sometimes you’re doing multiple things at once. Star Trek: The Original Series, those opening credits every time told you what the mission was of the Enterprise, but each time, they were also meeting a new civilization, and through that way they could introduce concepts like the Federation or we’ve moved beyond money, all the ideals of what their show is like and how stuff is structured and set up.

There’s a big science fiction project I’m talking about doing that the explanation of what has happened to the world is so lengthy that even at the conceptual stage we have to think about how much are we info dumping to audience right at the start versus exposing people piece by piece as things come up.

**Craig:** I do love an info dump. I love a creative info dump. It’s one of my favorite things to do.

**John:** Some of that has attention in the moment, but it’s also getting you through that, getting over that bump. Megana, because we have you, we actually have some listener questions that came in that were specifically exactly for you. I’m wondering if Drew might want to read you some of them.

**Drew:** Wait a second. This is (singing) We Have a Question for Megana.

**John:** Yes.

**Drew:** Cool. Fred writes, “Congratulations to Megana!”

**Craig:** Woo.

**Megana:** Woo.

**John:** Yay.

**Drew:** “I’d be interested in hearing about Megana’s journey, leaving the corporate world and becoming a screenwriter. Can she share her story and offer any tips to aspiring writers?”

**Craig:** Megana, you have 40 seconds. Go.

**Megana:** Oh my god. This question is tough, because it’s so hard for me to emotionally relate to what I was doing at that point, because I feel like I made a lot of bad decisions. If I were to give advice to somebody else, I’d be like, “Have a plan. Line up another job.”

I worked at Google for five years, and then I quit my job, and I had no plan. I moved out to Los Angeles. I had money saved up. I had a family friend, who was my mom’s best friend from when I was six years old. I knew that she had an extra bedroom in her place in Long Beach that I could stay at rent-free for a while. That was my path to coming out to LA. Then once I was here, I just tried everything and threw myself and tried to talk to as many people as I could and luckily started working for John within that year.

Then in terms of offering any tips to aspiring writers, I think looking back, there are so many things I might’ve done differently, like writing more or doing some more of the planning when I have the security of a full-time job, but also things worked out because I had made room for changes in my life, if that makes sense.

It’s something that I think about a lot is that if you want change in your life, you do have to make room or space for it. I think that if you are writing for five minutes or 30 minutes a day, you’re going to see progress or change, but it’s going to be proportionate to the amount of time you’re giving that activity.

**Craig:** It just strikes me that what you’re maybe… It’s not that you’re dancing around it, but I think what you’re struggling with is something I’ve struggled with so many times when I’ve been asked this question, which is, yeah, I can share my story, and I suppose I could offer you tips, but really what I’m what saying is here’s the unique thing that happened to me, and here are the tips that I learned along the way that are applicable to me but may not be at all applicable to you.

The way I got here isn’t how you’re going to get here, so I don’t know. Is this a great question or not? That’s the thing. Everyone asks it of everybody, but at some point, you do start to wonder, does it matter?

**Megana:** It’s also so hard because it’s really hard and heartbreaking in ways that I could never have predicted, and so it’s hard to encourage anyone or offer tips looking back on things retrospectively, because I don’t know, it feels like it was just luck.

**John:** It was luck, but it was also you put yourself in a situation where you could get lucky. You put yourself in a situation where you stopped working for Google and you moved out to stay at your aunt’s house in Long Beach, where you could be lucky when Megan got staffed on Wandavision, and suddenly there was an opening and you could interview for her job and be like, “Oh, of course, Megana should take over.” You put yourself in a position to be lucky.

I think that’s the common thing I’ve seen among everyone who’s been in your job and gone on and done great things is that you were working really hard, but you were also open to situations that could happen. When those opportunities presented themselves, you had writing samples to show. You had a work ethic that you could demonstrate. You had people who could recommend you. You were ready for when luck was ready to strike.

**Craig:** Chance favors the prepared.

**John:** Last thing I’ll say, sometimes when you think back like, oh, you spent your five years working at Google, does one regret that? Tell me what you think. I’m not sure that regret is really useful, because you don’t know whether starting your writing career five years earlier would’ve helped or not helped. You can’t say.

**Megana:** I think that those experiences really informed me. When I talk to a college student, I think just take any job. Working and having experience showed me what I didn’t want to do, what was important to me. I wouldn’t have been able to come to those conclusions if I didn’t try something.

I think it was really useful to be working there, because it was a really awesome company to work for. The perks were incredible. I met such smart people. I still had this thing in me that wanted to pursue screenwriting. No matter how great the company was, I realized that that thing wasn’t going to go away.

**John:** Also, keep in mind, you were heavily involved with all of the Pay Up Hollywood stuff and speaking up for supporting staff pay and conditions. Had you not spent five years working that actually had a structure and had some sort of standards, would you have had the experience to say, “Oh, no, that’s not right. This is not how a reputable company should be working.” I don’t know that what we were able to do helping supporting staff would’ve been the safe if it hadn’t been for you and your experience.

**Megana:** I did have a very different context in standard, reading those emails. I also think your first few years of working, and this is something you talk about all the time, is just learning to be a professional. I think Hollywood is such, I don’t know, Wild West of an industry that it can be hard for people who only come up through the entertainment industry to know how to navigate that.

**John:** Another part of your story which I will say is useful and a good reminder is that you moved out here and you’ve kept your expenses low, which Craig and I often talk about. By staying at your aunt’s house, you didn’t have to take the very first thing that was offered. You could really figure out what it is that you were trying to do. You didn’t have to be so desperate, which I think was a great choice that you were able to make. Craig, I don’t know if you even know that. The first couple weeks that Megana was working here, she would drive to and from Long Beach to the office here.

**Megana:** It was the first three months.

**John:** First three months.

**Megana:** It was rough. It was really rough.

**Craig:** John was paying careful attention to your pain.

**Megana:** John would be like, “I can’t even think about it. It’s going to stress me out too much.” I’d be like, “Okay. It’ll be two hours until I get home. Bye.”

**Craig:** These are the things we do. I will say when you are in your 20s, there is a certain amount of stamina there and an ability to bear the kind of stuff that you deal with when you’re an up-and-comer. There are also things that as time has gone on have made things a bit easier.

For instance, when I started out, let’s say I knew, okay, I have to go to a meeting at Fox. Uh-oh, I live in North Hollywood in my small apartment. It’s going to take a while to get to Fox. How long? I don’t know, because there’s no internet to tell me. In fact, there’s no computerized maps. There’s the Thomas Guide, which is a large book that shows me things, but basically, I’ve figured out how to get to Fox. That’s how I’m going. There is no Waze or Google to say, “Oh, by the way, don’t go that way today.”

You’re just going, “I could go one of two ways. I can go down and to the left or I can go left and down. I’ll go down and to the left today.” Oh, wrong. Looks like it’s going to be an hour and 45 minutes and you’re going to miss your meeting. You can’t even call them to tell them-

**John:** I’ve done it.

**Craig:** … because you’re in a car without a phone. This is how it used to be. We’ve all carried the burdens. Driving a long way, a long commute, is something that so many Americans deal with. So many Americans shoulder that burden. There is a privilege in living near your workplace if you work in a city. It just gets more and more expensive the closer and closer you get to work. This is part of life. God, I did a lot of commuting back in those days, a lot. You do it.

**John:** We’ve got one more question here from Ben.

**Drew:** Ben asks, “Megana, with access to John and Craig and guests as knowledge resources, what advice have you learned from working there that you have found most useful on your writing journey?”

**Megana:** Wow, another really big question.

**Craig:** These feel unfair.

**Megana:** It does relate to the thing that you were saying earlier. I would say a big thing that I’ve learned from having access to so many guests and the both of you is your creative processes are so different from mine, and so is everyone’s. It’s unique.

I think one thing that I have learned is finding models that work for me, finding validation that some people work in the same way that I do, but also maybe permission that my process is going to look different, because I think one thing that all of the guests and you guys have in common is that the creative process is ugly and difficult and surprising and can be heartbreaking. I think just setting those sorts of expectations is really helpful.

Also, I feel like I’ve learned that just because things feel awkward or strange or difficult during your journey or your writing doesn’t necessarily mean that they’re wrong. I don’t know, sometimes things do feel really great, and you should actually chase that feeling and maybe not keep… This is more to myself to not keep writing the thing that you can’t figure out.

**Craig:** Just because it’s hard doesn’t mean it’s correct.

**Megana:** It works both ways.

**Craig:** There’s no doubt. It does. It works both ways. You’re absolutely correct that John and I have different processes from each other. One of the things that I think is most admirable is when people in our business, when asked how ought one do something, respond with the way that works best for you. What I loathe is when people say, “Allow me to tell you how to do stuff,” and, “Real screenwriters do it like this, and failures do it like this.” Oh, shut up.

**Megana:** The episode with the Daniels was so cool, because in watching Everything Everywhere All At Once, it’s like, “Oh, this is so well done. They must have had this plan or this guide or whatever.” To hear their process, it’s like, “Oh wow, that’s kind of like how I feel when I’m stuck in the weeds.” The fact that they were able to produce this beautiful thing is just inspiring. I think that it’s been so helpful to hear these stories week after week and from the both of you, then just encourage that process and just the practice of continuing to do things that feel difficult.

**Craig:** That’s the way.

**John:** One last question for you on behalf of Drew. What advice do you have for Drew stepping into your role producing a Scriptnotes podcast? Any things you think Drew needs to know?

**Megana:** I have trained Drew on a lot of the things I think he needs to know. I think he’s doing a pretty great job so far.

**Drew:** Can I ask you a question?

**Megana:** Yes.

**Drew:** How do I get Craig to stop texting me? It’s just constant.

**Megana:** I am so jealous. Just tell him that your phone number is mine, because I would love to be texting with Craig more.

**Drew:** I’m going to do that.

**Craig:** I have literally never texted him once.

**Drew:** You text me all the time, Craig.

**Craig:** Why am I texting you? What am I texting you about? Tell me.

**Drew:** It’s just compliments.

**Craig:** Compliments, yeah. Just like, “Who does your hair?”

**Drew:** Yeah, exactly.

**Craig:** Sometimes I’ll text you in the middle of the night. I’m just like, “You up?” Yeah, I do. Then an hour will go by. Even though it’s the middle of the night, an hour will go by, and then I’ll be like, “Why aren’t you talking to me? Are we fighting?” I’ll do it all night. Then when he wakes up in the morning, he’s like, “Oh my god, what do I do about this?”

**Drew:** Look, it’s a back and forth. It’s okay. I was just hoping Megana might be able to [crosstalk 00:51:12].

**Megana:** I know this is a joke, but I’m still incredibly jealous and fuming.

**Craig:** She’s jealous of me stalking you. I’m going to do it. Megana, I swear to god, I’m going to set an alarm. I’m going to wake up at 2:30 in the morning. I’m just going to text you, “You up?”

**Megana:** Please do.

**Craig:** “You up?” is the funniest… Oh my god, I just love that. “You up?” Hysterical.

**John:** It’s time for our One Cool Things. Megana, you get to start us off, because I’m curious what you think is cool.

**Megana:** That’s so sweet. I have three One Cool Things, but I am going to choose just two, so that you guys invite me again.

**Craig:** I have none, so go ahead, cook.

**Megana:** I’m going to choose the two that have to do with collective narratives. The first is this book called Unscripted: The Epic Battle for a Media Empire and the Redstone Family Legacy. It’s by James B. Stewart and our Scriptnotes friend, Rachel Abrams from the New York Times, who we worked with on Pay Up Hollywood stuff.

**John:** Great.

**Megana:** It is about Sumner Redstone and the family. It is such a fun read and so informative of I would say the early aughts, like what we were talking about earlier.

**John:** Cool. We’ll definitely take a look at that. Does it feel Succession-y?

**Megana:** Yes.

**John:** I think obviously there’s a lot of Redstone stuff happening in Succession.

**Megana:** In reading it, I’m constantly like, “Oh, is this where they got that Succession storyline from?” It’s really fun and fun to read in advance of the fourth season coming out.

**John:** Awesome.

**Megana:** Then my other One Cool Thing is The Romantics on Netflix. It is this docuseries by Smriti Mundhra, who is this really cool director. She did Indian Matchmaking for Netflix as well. It’s about Yash Chopra Films. Yash Chopra is a very influential filmmaker in Bollywood. I think whether you’ve watched Bollywood or not, it is so delightful. She does such an incredible job of tying how films and media were in conversation with Indian politics at the time. Would definitely recommend.

**John:** Is The Romantics a documentary?

**Megana:** It’s four episodes. It’s one of those docuseries things.

**Craig:** A docuseries.

**Megana:** I guess it’s not a thing.

**John:** Love it.

**Megana:** It’s a docuseries.

**Craig:** Like Tiger King, but without tigers or the Tiger King and with Yash Chopra and Bollywood.

**Megana:** Exactly.

**Craig:** Nailed it.

**John:** Nailed it. My One Cool Thing is incredibly basic. It is a vertical mouse by Logitech. It’s called The Lift. I’ve used a vertical mouse for many, many years. If you are having a hard time visualizing it, imagine you’re shaking somebody’s hand. That’s the position you want to keep your hand in.

**Craig:** What is going on with you? You’ve verticalized every interface.

**John:** I originally got my vertical mouse because Dana Fox, who you love, and has been on this show many times, she introduced me to the vertical mouse. It is so much better for your wrist, because you’re not turning your wrist down. You’re keeping your wrist up.

I’ve been using one for many, many years. It crapped out on me. I got this one from Logitech. It’s maybe a tiny bit small for my hands. I kind of have small hands. It works seamlessly. It has really good resolution and tracking. We’ll put a link in the show notes to it. If you’re loving for a vertical mouse, especially for a Mac, I highly recommend it. It works great for me.

**Craig:** I like pain!

**John:** I love it. He wants brutal pain.

**Craig:** Meh!

**John:** Craig, you’re passing on your One Cool Thing? You’re just taking one of Megana’s?

**Craig:** Absolutely taking one of Meganas. Mine is also The Romantics on Netflix.

**John:** Love it. That’s our show for this week, guys. Scriptnotes is produced by Drew Marquardt.

**Craig:** You know it.

**John:** It’s edited by Matthew Chilelli. Our outro this week is by Lex Kornelis. If you have an outro, you can send us a link to ask@johnaugust.com. That’s also where you can send questions.

You can find the show notes for this episode and all episodes at johnaugust.com. That’s also where you’ll find transcripts and sign up for our weeklyish newsletter called Inneresting, which has lots of links to things about writing. We have T-shirts and hoodies. They’re great. They’re from Cotton Bureau. Just go to Cotton Bureau. You’ll find them there.

You can sign up to become Premium member on scriptnotes.net, where you’ll get all the back-episodes and Bonus Segments, like the one we’re about to record on getting ready with me.

**Megana:** Hashtag GRWM.

**John:** Only for Scriptnotes Premium members. Megana, it was so great to have you back.

**Megana:** Thanks, guys.

**Craig:** Thank you.

[Bonus Segment]

**John:** Megana Rao, talk us through get ready with me. I barely know what this is.

**Megana:** Get ready with me is a, it’s now new, but it has been increasing in popularity, trend on TikTok where different influencers will look into the camera and do their makeup for whatever event as they are chatting to you about what’s on their mind, about things that they are experiencing. Drew, please jump in if you’ve been watching any of these.

**Drew:** I haven’t been watching any of these.

**Megana:** Okay, cool.

**Drew:** I really wish I knew.

**Craig:** Drew, you’re gonna be fine.

**John:** I may have a reference for this though, because Drew Barrymore, who is a friend, she will have her camera up in the bathroom as she’s doing her makeup and she’s watching her face and doing all that stuff. She’s talking to the camera while she’s doing all that. Is that get ready with me?

**Megana:** Yes, exactly. It’s like, “Get ready with me as I go to New Year’s party,” or, “Get ready with me for a day of work,” or something like that.

**John:** Is it a similar thing to, there’s this young blonde influencer woman, she’s a stay-at-home girlfriend, who’s like, “Now I make a smoothie for my boyfriend and I take it to the gym and he really likes it.”

**Craig:** Which just sounds scary.

**John:** It’s [crosstalk 00:57:03].

**Megana:** Is that the voice or are you doing the computer automated voice that they put on top of their videos a long time?

**John:** I wasn’t doing a TikTok voice, but she has that voice herself, dead inside.

**Megana:** It’s really strange, and it’s so boring. It’s people cleaning their apartments or making smoothies for their boyfriends, but I spend hours watching these things.

**Craig:** Wow. If I made a get ready with me video, it would just be like, okay, shower, clothes, go, done. I don’t use products. There is no getting ready. Every morning of my life is just me launching myself out of a cannon and doom scrolling and then flinging myself into the car. There’s just no getting ready.

**Megana:** It is this gendered thing. It’s part beauty tutorial, part makeup tutorial, I mean.

**Craig:** Fashion.

**Megana:** It’s just so interesting to me, because getting ready, it’s an intimate thing. It’s your bridge between your private and public life. I don’t know, it’s just so weird to me that I now have access to all of these people’s process for how they transition from their home to the public world.

**John:** One of the things you put in the Workflowy here is this Alix Earle, A-L-I-X, Earle. One of the videos in her Instagram or her TikTok was her and her little sister, and they’re doing their makeup together. It was an ad actually for something. It was for some concealer. They were side by side.

It feels like that’s what you’re describing. It’s the kind of experience you normally would have with a big sister, watching her do her thing and being side by side while she’s doing her thing, but because maybe we’re all only children, we’re all by ourselves all the time, it just feels like there’s somebody there. It’s nice to just be next to somebody while they’re doing their thing. Is that the feel?

**Megana:** Yes, exactly, because I have this experience where this 13-year-old’s get ready with me came across my TikTok, and she’s getting ready for this bar mitzvah. Then I don’t know, however many videos later, I’m so invested in her life. I’ve seen all of her different bar mitzvah outfits. I’m like, “I shouldn’t have access to this.”

Also, when I was 13, so much of the fun of getting ready for an event like this is being around your friends who are also getting ready and learning in the same physical space. Yet me as a 30-year-old woman just watching this 13-year-old get ready for her bar mitzvah is so dark.

**Craig:** Ew, strange. Obviously, the easy cliché question is are you really seeing them getting ready or are you seeing them doing a version of getting ready that is being seen, so it’s a different thing? Let’s say it’s all honest. This is really them getting ready. It does also promote this notion of perfectionism, I think. All of this, I find it disconcerting.

**Megana:** It’s interesting that it’s an anti-perfectionism, because they are letting you behind the mask. They’re letting you see their blemished skin and all of those things.

**Craig:** Let me push back. They’re letting you see their blemished skin, and then they’re showing you how when they’re done, it’s not blemished anymore and how they have perfected it before they walk out the door. It’s like when very beautiful people are like, “Look, here’s a picture of me without makeup.” I’m like, “You’re still hot. You’re still beautiful. You know you’re beautiful. That’s why you’re doing it.”

To show them all the layers and stuff, and then they’re go off to something cool or whatever, I don’t know. It feels aspirational in a dangerous way, the way that all advertising has always been. That’s not even a gendered thing. Maybe the nature of it is gendered. “You want to look beautiful, don’t you? Here’s how you do it. You want to have an awesome car. Here’s how you do it.” I don’t know. It’s just when I hear about a 13-year-old girl commoditizing her life, it’s scary to me. It’s scary.

**Megana:** It’s so frightening. In the article that John linked for collective narratives, that Substack article, he talks about how teen happiness in the early 2000s was at an all-time high, and he had this theory that it was because it was early internet, where kids are just sharing memes online, but they’re still in physical spaces together. I was so struck by that compared to… When I was younger, we used to watch makeup tutorials on YouTube, but the women were much older than us. The idea of being a 13-year-old and creating content in this way is so wild and terrifying to me.

**Craig:** Terrifying, yes. Let the kids be kids. I understand that every sentence that comes out of my mouth will be something that an old man says. I don’t know. As a parent, I worry about it. I worry about the fact that your life becomes memorialized permanently and belongs to everyone, that there is a sense that you’re curating your own moments.

One of my kids was talking about BeReal the other day and saying how it’s literally become the opposite of BeReal. Literally. It’s like, “Oh my god, BeReal. Here I am riding a unicorn and drinking champagne while my hair’s on fire, and there’s my new boyfriend. Oh my god, you caught us at just the right time.” Did we?

**John:** An option I would see with get ready with me videos, because now I’m realizing there’s other things that are actually part of that trend. I just didn’t recognize it. There’s a guy who’s blind who, basically just like that, basically like, “This is how I figure out my closet and what I’m going to wear in the mornings. This is how I make breakfast.” It’s his boyfriend filming the whole thing. That’s a perspective I wouldn’t have seen otherwise.

I don’t know what it’s like to be a blind person getting your morning routine together, or I don’t know what it’s like to be getting your morning together if you’re using a wheelchair. In the sense of giving you a window into other people’s spaces and daily lives, that could be really useful.

I think that’s one of the good things about the internet that we didn’t have before is that it could give you some perspective in what a life is like that is not yours. That’s good, but I do share most of our other horrors about especially teenagers feeling like, “I have to perform being myself.” That I don’t think is healthy.

**Craig:** What you’re saying about seeing a window into other people’s lives, that makes sense. To the extent that these things can be empathy building and instructive and help us understand other people is great. To the extent that they are about a calculated lack of calculation and about physical perfectionism and lookism and sizism and all the other isms… Remember, these things are, I assume, heavily featured people who have very typical Western standards of beauty and the typical body size that the media says we’re supposed to have. I don’t know.

I don’t know how I would feel about watching even a guy my age. Like, okay, you’re 50 years old. Here’s a 50-year-old guy who’s like, “Get ready with me.” Then I’m like, “Aw, man, he’s in awesome shape, and he’s really handsome, and he’s got a full head of hair. He’s gonna put on his… Oh, that’s an interesting shaving lotion. Okay, I can see how that might help with razor bumps. Oh, okay, those are possibly cool shoes to wear with those pants, but really, it doesn’t matter what the hell he wears.”

**Drew:** Do you find any comfort in a ritual though? I feel like I do find comfort in watching a ritual.

**Craig:** I will tell you this very strange thing I’ve noticed about myself. I don’t know if I’ve ever mentioned it on this show. It occurred to me one day that when I wash my hair, or my head I guess at this point I should say, my hands do the exact same thing in the exact same way for the exact same amount of time every single time. I have completely ritualized the movements of my fingers and hands over my head. It’s remarkable. I don’t know how it happened. There’s no variation whatsoever. I’ve created some strange rituals for myself. I don’t think that they’re signs of OCD as much as just humans ritualize things.

I don’t have any great interest in that stuff. I don’t. If people were like, “Oh, why don’t you walk us through getting to ready to write,” I would be like, “Eff on off out of my office, friend. You don’t want to see that, and I don’t want to show it to you.”

**Megana:** I guess it just feels like, and I feel old saying this too, the amount of time that your camera is recording is just longer and longer. The one-way intimacy of it is confusing to me for young people growing up. I don’t know. I guess I’m in the situation where I’m very invested in this person’s life. I know what their rituals are. I know what they’re doing. They’ve shared a lot with me. It’s so weird to have that intimacy flattened and unreciprocated.

**Craig:** You taught us all about parasocial relationships. I get it completely. I would argue that for people who listen to us on this show and have listened for a long, long time, they actually know us pretty well, because this is us. I know John. It’s not like when the mic goes off, I’m like, “Okay, now the real John pops out.”

**John:** [inaudible 01:07:08].

**Craig:** We are this, so they actually do know us. The intimacy is a product of time and exposure. There is no calculation. That’s one of the best things I think about audio only is that it removes a certain kind of vanity or insecurity from the equation, which I have seen my face on television way too much.

This weird thing that’s happened is because… Sometimes in LA, I would get recognized because people just knew that I was on Scriptnotes, and it’d be like, “Oh, you’re a Scriptnotes fan.” What’s happened now is, because I do those little segments at the end of The Last of Us-

**Megana:** They’re so cute.

**Craig:** Thank you. I appreciate that.

**Megana:** I’m always like, “Aw.”

**Craig:** “Aw.” That’s what I go for, unthreatening. That actually means that now people are recognizing me. I swear to god, I’m confused every time. I gotta figure out how to get around this. I know I’m not Brad Pitt. What I feel almost every single time is a certain twinge of insecurity.

**John:** Megana, I’m curious, because we’ve talked about this off mic, but you are recognized some just because of your role on Scriptnotes. To what degree are you finding it helpful? To what degree is that annoying? How are you feeling about your semi-fame off of here?

**Megana:** I would say our listeners are very niche and specialized. They are people who are interested in screenwriting and things that are interesting to screenwriters. It’s cool, because they’re also people in my industry. I’m not recognized that often, so it’s not something that I have to deal with like Craig. It’s fun because it means that the person listens to Scriptnotes, and then I have something to talk about with them.

**Craig:** You have a famous name, I think, because you are the only Megana I’ve ever met in my life.

**Megana:** Keep it that way.

**Craig:** Oh, I will. Trust me. If I meet another one, I’m just gonna turn around and walk away. It’s just a very specific name that there’s not a lot of them. I think when people probably see it on a piece of paper or something, they’re like, “Oh, I know who you are.”

**Megana:** You guys did do a very nice thing when Drew started, which I also appreciated, because I didn’t know how to say your last name, where you had a whole bit about pronunciation and who he was. I would say that people still think that I am Megan McDonald who just got married.

**Craig:** Married to a guy named Arao. It really does flow. I gotta say, 999 people out of a thousand, or perhaps all thousand, if you said, “Can you write out the name Megana Rao for me?” would say Megan, and then they would be like, “How do you spell Arao?” Is it a common name in India?

**Megana:** Yes, it is. It means “of the clouds,” because mega means cloud in Sanskrit.

**Craig:** Of the clouds.

**Megana:** I’m not resentful at all of the portion that you guys gave Drew to explain his name.

**Craig:** We finally got around to it.

**John:** We learned. We’ve learned our lesson. I will say-

**Craig:** You’re so ethereal. You’re of the clouds.

**John:** A friend of ours was hiring a new assistant. One of the assistants who was under consideration was also Meghna, which is the other spelling of Meghna, so just-

**Craig:** Oh, Meghna.

**John:** M-E-G-H-N-A, which is the same name, correct?

**Megana:** Correct, yeah.

**Craig:** By the way, Megana, it feels a little weird as a white guy to be like, “Okay, now your name is Megana. What does that mean?” It’s a little weird.

**Megana:** Fair enough.

**John:** This would’ve been a great way to first introduce you on the podcast if we’d said, “Your name is Megana. It’s the same pronunciation as Pamela.” It’s not hard for people to do, because my frustration was people saying, “Oh, is Megana [meh-GAH-nuh] gonna be setting that up?”

**Craig:** Megana [meh-GAH-nuh].

**John:** You hear it all the time.

**Megana:** Yeah, and Megna [MAYG-nuh], Megana [MEH-guh-nuh], all of those are fine. Megana [meh-GAH-nuh] though is what people reach for first though, in a way that’s confusing.

**Craig:** Megana [meh-GAH-nuh]. I’ve been getting Craig Mazin [MA-zn] my whole life. My whole life.

**John:** That’s why I changed my name.

**Craig:** Exactly. Listen. You changed it to a month.

**John:** Megana, thank you for coming back on the show. You’re welcome back any time, of course.

**Megana:** Thank you guys.

**Craig:** Thanks, Megana.

**John:** Open invitation.

**Drew:** I’m so glad you’re here.

**Megana:** Bye.

**Craig:** See you guys.

**Drew:** Bye.

**John:** Bye.

Links:

* [How to Become a Member of the WGA](https://www.wga.org/the-guild/going-guild/join-the-guild)
* [Conceiving the 2000s](https://noahpinion.substack.com/p/conceiving-the-2000s) by Noah Smith
* [Unscripted: The Epic Battle for a Media Empire and the Redstone Family Legacy](https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/612741/unscripted-by-james-b-stewart-and-rachel-abrams/) by James B. Stewart and Rachel Abrams
* [The Romantics on Netflix](https://www.netflix.com/title/81617079)
* [Logitech Lift Vertical Mouse](https://www.logitech.com/en-us/products/mice/lift-vertical-ergonomic-mouse-mac.910-006471.html?&utm_source=Google&utm_medium=Paid-Search&utm_campaign=Dialect_FY23_Q4_USA_LO_Logi_DTX-Logitech-Mac_Google_na&gclid=CjwKCAiAu5agBhBzEiwAdiR5tNB44Kqgo3rP9iFY1dYBXRKyxkrUCdDT7nmVvN7TXM-p4SK6A6QlLBoCBy4QAvD_BwE)
* [Get a Scriptnotes T-shirt!](https://cottonbureau.com/people/scriptnotes-podcast)
* [Check out the Inneresting Newsletter](https://inneresting.substack.com/)
* [Gift a Scriptnotes Subscription](https://scriptnotes.supportingcast.fm/gifts) or [treat yourself to a premium subscription!](https://scriptnotes.supportingcast.fm/)
* [Craig Mazin](https://www.instagram.com/clmazin/) on Instagram
* [John August](https://twitter.com/johnaugust) on Twitter
* [John on Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/johnaugust/?hl=en)
* [John on Mastodon](https://mastodon.art/@johnaugust)
* [Outro](http://johnaugust.com/2013/scriptnotes-the-outros) by Lex Kornelis ([send us yours!](http://johnaugust.com/2014/outros-needed))
* Scriptnotes is produced by [Drew Marquardt](https://www.instagram.com/marquardtam/) and edited by [Matthew Chilelli](https://twitter.com/machelli).

Email us at ask@johnaugust.com

You can download the episode [here](http://traffic.libsyn.com/scriptnotes/591standard.mp3).

Scriptnotes, Episode 590: Anti-Villains, Transcript

April 27, 2023 Scriptnotes Transcript

The original post for this episode can be found [here](https://johnaugust.com/2023/anti-villains).

**John August:** Hello and welcome. My name is John August.

**Craig Mazin:** My name is Craig Mazin.

**John:** This is Episode 590 of Scriptnotes, a podcast about screenwriting and things that are interesting to screenwriters. Today on the show, why do some people do bad things. More specifically, why does past trauma lead some characters to become villains, while others become heroes? We’ll wrestle with good and evil, right and wrong, and how that impacts the choices our characters make. We’ll also be answering some listener questions on character jobs and getting paid. In our Bonus Segment for Premium members, we will talk tattoos. I’ve now had mine for 30 years, but Craig, you are a newbie to the whole tattoo world.

**Craig:** Indeed.

**John:** Indeed.

**Craig:** Excited.

**John:** We’ll get into it. Now Craig, a few episodes back we were talking about phones and devices that executives used to have on their desks to tell their assistants about who’s calling in or, “Bring me a Coke.” We couldn’t think what they were called. Charlie wrote in to say those old things were called AmTels.

**Craig:** Yes, AmTels. It was an AmTel. Boy, I feel bad for the AmTel company. Where are they now?

**John:** They still sell them.

**Craig:** What?

**John:** We’ll put a link there. It’s amtel.com, A-M-T-E-L dot-com.

**Craig:** Oh my god.

**John:** They still make them. If you click through, they look kind of the same.

**Craig:** I’m looking. Oh my god. Oh my god. By the way, this website tells you everything. This website is like an incredible time capsule of what websites looked like in 2004 maybe.

**John:** It’s built with tables, the old way of the tables. You had to structure things with tables.

**Craig:** The little side menus that pop up and these weird window style boxing. This is nuts. They can’t still be in business.

**John:** I bet they could still make money.

**Craig:** I think this is a ghost.

**John:** I may get you one for Christmas, Craig.

**Craig:** If they can only sell one a year, that one might cost seven million dollars. Gotta keep them in business, John. You know what? They’re not in the business of going out of business.

**John:** That’s what it is. Flashback to Final Draft.

**Craig:** Oh my word.

**John:** Good lord. Back in the day, this is how an executive would know who was calling in, so they could see whether they want to answer it, hit a little button, say yes, reply, or, “Bring me a diet Coke.” Thank you, Charlie, for reminding us what these things were called and, wow, just a good flashback memory.

**Craig:** AmTels, wow, how about that?

**John:** That was all part of a discussion because I had asked listeners what should I do about my office phones, because they don’t ring anymore. There’s just really no sense in having them. Our listeners are the best. They have a lot of good suggestions, which Drew sorted through. One was a service called Dialpad, which is replacing a traditional office thing.

One that I found was most fascinating was, Adam wrote in to say, “I’m currently working completely remote as a producer’s assistant. We’re using an iPhone as our office line, and it’s been great. We can easily save contacts, merge calls with my boss and additional participants. I’m logged into my company email so I can quickly retrieve any relevant info if I’m away from my desk. I just turn the phone off during off hours so I’m not constantly checking two phones.” Essentially, Adam just has a second phone, which is the office phone. That’s the number it rings to there. He just does everything from that phone.

**Craig:** That is a very attractive solution, because the issue with the old phones is they simply weren’t connected to the systems that everything else is connected to. This is the physical object hardware version of the software solution of getting a separate Google account which I have for my business. That Google account is where we keep all of our contacts and we sink through all the things that I need to share with my assistant or my partners. This makes sense. It’s a little annoying obviously for an assistant to carry around two phones at the same time. You need more pockets. That’s attractive. That’s an attractive thought, although honestly, we just use our own phones.

**John:** The challenge is though, when your current assistant, when Bo is no longer your assistant, then who are they calling? They need to have a new number to call.

**Craig:** It’s the handover process of, Megana hands it over to Drew. A lot of emails have to go out saying, “Here’s the change.” There’s a few weeks of adjustment, but then it all adjusts.

**John:** Also, Drew shouldn’t have to be answering that phone at 1 in the morning.

**Craig:** Oh, yes, he should.

**John:** Oh, yes, he should.

**Craig:** Oh, yes, he should!

**John:** Crisis.

**Craig:** Drew, get me a diet Coke! I’m gonna ruin him for no reason at all.

**John:** Also, if Drew has that phone, what am I gonna throw at him?

**Craig:** Exactly. Now John, what I would suggest is you go and get some old phones that maybe are on sale for 20 bucks that don’t function at all, that are just being sold for parts. Just get 12 of those and just have them in a holster.

**John:** You’re set.

**Craig:** Yep, perfect.

**John:** The other solutions people suggested, and thank you for writing in, included Google Fi, Verizon One Talk, Webex, which some people are using. I think some agencies have moved over to Webex. We’ll see, but we’ll report back with whatever we decide as a solution for this.

**Craig:** Great.

**John:** Cool. Last bit of follow-up here, we talked about government influence on films, because we had these script consultants who were being paid by foreign powers. Phillip in Los Angeles wrote in. Craig, do you want to read through this?

**Craig:** Sure. Phillip writes, “In Episode 587, you spoke about how state influence on film is bigger in Europe than America. In many ways, you downplayed the US government’s role in films, specifically even military. The Department of Defense has a Hollywood liaison office that is more involved in scripts than the contractors hired in Europe. While this isn’t government dictating all scripts with military themes, access to military vehicles, equipment, and technical expertise saves studios millions of dollars and grants authenticity they couldn’t get otherwise. See Top Gun: Maverick.” There’s a link to an LA Times story covering that very thing. Phillip, agreed, but this isn’t about funding. That is not specifically funding. It’s about access, which is different, I think, than what we were discussing.

**John:** It is. I can also think that access to a lot of places where you want to film or things you want to use, yeah, you are gonna be consulting those people and probably even getting scripts cleared through those people. If you wanted to set a film on specifically a Native American reservation, you’re gonna have to go through the tribal governments there, and they might actually have some ability to say no, we don’t want you doing that. You can envision a lot of scenarios beyond just the military where there’s gonna be approvals that are gonna have to happen.

**Craig:** Tons of those things. Just in case people are wondering, there are always trade-offs. Like John’s describing, most places that are in a position to gatekeep are going to want to take a look at the material. Certainly, the Department of Defense very famously wasn’t going to let Top Gun or any of the movies that Jerry has made that connect with the military… None of them can say things or depict things that paint the military in a particularly negative light. Obviously, the military has no interest in funding something that makes it look bad.

Similarly, like you mention, we were all over Alberta. Our upcoming episode that’s coming out on Sunday was partly shot in Waterton, which is a federal park in Canada. There were all sorts of restrictions that came along with shooting there that we had to make sure we obeyed. Lots of trade-offs, but those are the decisions you make as a production. That said, Phillip, not quite what we were talking about.

**John:** On the issue though of military portrayals, it got me thinking back to an article I read a couple weeks ago. I’ll try to find a link and put it in the show notes about how the Army’s using these influencers who are TikTok star kind of people who are specifically there to sell how great it is to be in the military or the military lifestyle. “She’s an influencer, but she’s also in the Army.”

**Craig:** Vaguely insidious.

**John:** Insidious. It feels like propaganda. It feels like [inaudible 00:08:14]. That’s a different kind of thing than what we’re talking about with a script approval. I think that’s what we were worried about. That’s what we were worried about when we heard a script consultant from Europe, being like, oh, no, it’d have to include exactly these messages. These are going to be state propaganda films.

**Craig:** There is no free lunch, my friends.

**John:** If you’re trying to shoot a movie in Turkey these days, I bet there would be a lot of concerns and restrictions.

**Craig:** Yes, pretty much anywhere. That’s how it goes.

**John:** We have a bit of follow-up here from Pay Up Hollywood. Drew, could you help us out with this?

**Drew Marquardt:** Sure. Rekha writes, “Three years ago ish, during the beginning of the movement that would become Pay Up Hollywood, you mentioned Rob McElhenney as a positive example of how you treat your staff. On that same episode, you read from my anonymous letter as an agency assistant. At the time, I was so terrified I created a fake email so it couldn’t be traced back to me.

“As I’ve grown older within this industry, I’ve become much more outspoken about the realities. I moved out of the agency life, worked for some incredible writer/showrunner-led production companies, and now actually work with Jackie Cohn and Rob McElhenney. I’ve experienced Rob’s kindness and generosity firsthand. The environment he creates is so incredible and warm.

“I just wanted to point out this small connection, because it almost feels like fate. Technically, we were mentioned in the same episode, Rob as someone who is a great boss, and me as someone who’s really struggling, but years later, the universe actually put us together. I know the value of hard work and perseverance, but being raised in a lot of Indian and Hindu cultural influence, I can’t help but shake the notion that everything happens for a reason and some things are meant to be.

“Your work and your commitment means so much to me. Back then, even though you didn’t know who I was, I felt like someone was listening to me for the first time. Most people didn’t know that I was writing in at all. Sometimes I’m still scared because I’m still on the lower level side, but I think it’s important that we keep talking about it and all things affecting the treatment of people in our industry. Thank you all for being the first to listen and a force that kept me going.”

**Craig:** Wow, that’s amazing.

**John:** That’s nice.

**Craig:** Rekha, thank you. I immediately tensed up at the beginning of her letter, because I’m like, “Oh, no, what did Rob do?” As it turned out, what he did was what he always does, which is be awesome. Rekha, you mentioned Indian Hindu cultural inference. I’m gonna teach you a word in Yiddish. Beshert. Beshert means fate or destiny. This is cross-cultural. Do I believe in supernatural fate or destiny? No, but it’s a nice feeling. It’s comforting. I don’t believe in ghosts, but it’s comforting sometimes to think of my grandmother watching me.

This is beautiful. I swear to god, I forget all the time that people even listen to this, much less are impacted and affected by it, but then I’m reminded all the time. Thank you for writing this. This is gorgeous. I’m just very happy.

**John:** I’m also pointing out, Rekha, just don’t sell your own agency short here. That agency may have started with you writing in anonymously to this podcast about what your experience was, but in sharing that story, not only did you put down in words what you were experiencing, you started to recognize that there were other people having the same experience. You got yourself out of that situation, into a better situation, then to a better situation, into where you are right now, which is just a steppingstone to wherever you’re headed next. I’m glad we were able to help, but we were only able to help because you spoke out and noticed what was going on around you and said, “Hey, this is not cool.” It does come back to you.

**Craig:** To be clear, when you say agency, you mean her volition and individual willpower, not the agency she worked at, which was apparently terrible.

**John:** No. That’s absolutely true. We want the good kind of agency, not the oppressive kind of agency.

**Craig:** Exactly.

**John:** Your self-determination is what we applaud.

**Craig:** I might actually feel good about myself until lunch today.

**John:** Nice. That’s all we can aim for in these troubled times.

**Craig:** It’ll go downhill.

**John:** The last little thing before we get into our main topic is, did you see the stuff about Dick Tracy?

**Craig:** No.

**John:** Do you remember the movie Dick Tracy at all?

**Craig:** Of course. Of course.

**John:** Dick Tracy, it’s a very brightly colored comic book adaption. I remember seeing it in theaters. I remember Warren Beatty starring in it. I remember Madonna was the woman in the film.

**Craig:** Tess Trueheart.

**John:** Tess Trueheart. I remember almost nothing about this film at all, but you know who does remember this film is Warren Beatty, because he continuously releases new things that are sequels to Dick Tracy, so that he can hold onto the rights. I just find it fascinating.

**Craig:** Why?

**John:** Because he can and because he would. I’ll put a link in the show notes to an article that’s speculating how he’s doing it and why he’s doing it. This most recent thing was a Zooming with Dick Tracy, where it’s a split screen thing where it’s Warren Beatty and Warren Beatty as Dick Tracy and Leonard Maltin and another film critic.

**Craig:** Oh, god.

**John:** It’s just long enough that it actually counts as a sequel. It shows up on Turner Classic Movies.

**Craig:** Oh my god, it’s a legal thing to just…

**John:** It’s a legal thing. It’s also clear that he actually has an artistic pride to it that’s interesting.

**Craig:** Why?

**John:** Because this was a comic book adaptation before they were all out there, so maybe it’s meaningful to him. Also, he just seems like, “Goddammit, no one is… “ He’s going to die owning this thing.

**Craig:** Wow.

**John:** That’s what he wants.

**Craig:** Dick Tracy, it was such a strange… Even when it came out. It was 1990. I was 19. Geez, Louise. I would read the comics in the paper. There are still comics in newspapers that are still newspapers, but back then a bit more common to read comics. Some of the comics were these ancient holdovers from my dad’s time, which you could tell were just soaking in this anachronistic, old-school way. It just was so old-fashioned. Dick Tracy was definitely one of them. He was a 1940s, ‘30s, ‘20s, 1920s-ish kind of guy. There were a bunch of Gasoline Alley and the girls in Apartment 3-G and Mary Worth.

**John:** Mary Worth.

**Craig:** Where you’re like, what the hell is-

**John:** I can’t do comic book guy’s voice, but he has, “This is the-“

**Craig:** “That’s the rare Mary Worth where she advises her friend to commit suicide.”

**John:** “Commit suicide.” Yes.

**Craig:** Mary Worth. I’m just like, “What is this?” Then when that movie came out, I guess I was like, “All right.” This is why these days when people are like, “Oh, we really want to make a Hungry, Hungry Hippos movie,” and I’m like, “It’s Dick Tracy. It’s old. Nobody now cares.” The point is, Dick Tracy was old-fashioned and out of date in 1990, which is why the movie was kind of a flop. What’s the point of holding onto it? Nobody knows what it is. It doesn’t matter. He has a wristwatch that’s a two-way radio. That was considered forward-looking technology.

**John:** Maybe it’s like holding onto intellectual property as actually just property, the same way people collect plastic cars. Maybe he just wants to hold onto this piece of IP for as long as it can be a piece of IP, because a copyright will expire. It will become public domain at a certain point.

**Craig:** This is like a very elaborate NFT.

**John:** That’s what it is. It really is an NFT before its time. I just thought it was great. I don’t have any particular comment on it. This idea of you have to keep making a thing to hold onto the rights is a real thing in Hollywood. Spider-Man famously, you had to make a Spider-Man movie every once in a while, or else the rights would all kick back to Marvel. Sony had to keep making Spider-Man movies.

**Craig:** I think lawyers have become much more savvy. The lawyers back when they made that deal in the ‘80s for the rights probably never considered that there was a loophole in which Warren Beatty could appear in the costume for five minutes in an interview and renew the rights for another 12 years. People have gotten smarter about that stuff, precisely because of things like this.

**John:** Probably the most famous example I remember is there was a Fantastic Four movie made by Roger Corman-

**Craig:** Yes, there was.

**John:** … which was just to hold onto I think Fox’s rights to it. They had to film it and then shelve it. It’s never been seen.

**Craig:** Somewhere on YouTube I think I’ve seen bits and pieces of it. It’s startling. Startling.

**John:** Startling.

**Craig:** Startling.

**John:** To our main topic today. This all comes out of Chris Csont, who does the Inneresting newsletter, was putting together a bunch of links for people writing about villain motivation and how villains come to be. When he laid them all out side by side, I realized they’re really talking about character motivation overall, whether they’re heroes or villains. So often what we think about, like, oh, that’s the reason why they’re the villain, you could just turn around and say, oh, that’s the reason why they became the hero. It’s basically the reaction to the events that happened or what’s driving them.

I thought we might take a look at villainy overall, look at some villains, and then in the lens of these articles, peel apart what are the choices that characters make that cause us to think of them as being heroes or villains and how we use that in our storytelling.

**Craig:** Great. I love this topic.

**John:** Cool. We love villains. Craig, let’s just make a list of things that villains do, what we’re talking about when we talk about villains in the course of a story. What are villainy things?

**Craig:** In the very basic sense, old-school way, you’ve got cops and robbers. Villains break the law.

**John:** They break laws that are there to help society. We also have heroes that can break laws. Villains break laws in ways that harm society or harm the community. They oppose the hero. Sometimes they seem to enjoy causing suffering or misery.

**Craig:** Villains oftentimes are marked by cruelty or sadism. Like you said, it’s something that undermines the social fabric of things.

**John:** They are selfish. They may steal. They can cheat. They will lie. They’re power-hungry. Yet all those things are things that sometimes heroes do as well. Maybe we’re sussing out the motivations for why they’re doing the thing that they’re doing. Do they have a noble purpose behind it? What’s the explanation? This all is against a backdrop. So often in these times we’re talking about antiheroes rather than villains and heroes. These are the Catwomans, the characters who are doing bad things, but for reasons that we as an audience relate to.

**Craig:** Sometimes villains are presented as people who maybe had a righteous grievance but are taking things too far. That’s a very typical Batman villain, not so much the Joker, but a lot of other villains. They start righteously. They’ve been hurt or wounded or offended. They want revenge, but they’re just going too far, whereas Batman was wounded and hurt and decided to make sure that nobody else got hurt again. These are the two different paths sometimes that heroes and villains go down. Heroes supposedly are doing things to care about others.

In a Judeo-Christian, emphasis on Christian, founded country, the notion of sacrifice and sacrificing yourself for the betterment of mankind is a very strong one for heroes, whereas villains are interested in either accruing power for themselves or healing themselves at the cost of anyone else.

**John:** Absolutely. Both heroes and villains may have trauma, but it’s what they’re doing with that trauma. That trauma caused them to lose hope or it’d inspire them to do things down the road.

**Craig:** Exactly.

**John:** That’s a factor. Also, look at the axis between conformity versus individuality or nonconformity. How willing is this person to stand up against the system? So often, we think about our heroes standing up against a tyrannical system. You can look at so many villains that are essentially the same kind of thing, where they believe they have the moral certitude that what they’re doing is correct and everybody else is wrong and therefore they will do what it takes to enact their vision. They’re not afraid of pissing everyone else off or blowing everyone else up in order to achieve their vision.

**Craig:** This is how you end up with that scene where the villain explains why they’re doing what they’re doing. “I’m gonna tear the whole thing down! I’m gonna make everyone pay!” and blah blah blah blah blah. This happens all the time with large-scale villains that, as you say, are nonconforming.

We have this impulse to both conform and nonconform. We want our heroes to save us all and keep the conformed society together. We despise our villains for nonconforming to the extent that they tear it all down, but we also want our heroes to nonconform so that they’re not like the rest of us.

Heroes and villains really are just reflecting the push and pull inside of our own minds. That’s why we’re attracted to the story over and over and over. It’s Punch and Judy. We have been watching this story forever, since there was fire and caves.

**John:** Absolutely. Just because it’s a great article on Wile E. Coyote, The 1000 Deaths of Wile E. Coyote, I would say perseverance is a thing to think about with villains as well. We think about heroes persevering, but in many cases it’s the villain who has persevered against all these obstacles in front of them that is the real story of, you keep knocking me down and I’ll just keep coming back stronger.

**Craig:** This is obviously all colored by the presentation of the narrative. It occurred to me after many years after watching Star Wars that we actually didn’t quite understand what was particularly bad about the Empire. We were told they were bad, but how? Why? Then later, that got filled in a bit. Mostly it’s just, man, it seems like they’re really mean to each other. It’s a really over-trained, corporal punishment-emphasizing, military group. What is exactly happening on the ground? What is it that these Rebels are fighting for?

You could certainly turn it around and go, wait, what if we were telling a story about America and Al-Qaeda? Now who’s the Empire? Now who are the Rebels? Which side are you on? It’s all about how you present these things, always.

**John:** I think Star Wars is a fascinating case, because you have the Empire, which is this giant bureaucracy but also has this supernatural power at the center. The Emperor is this supernatural figure who can do these magical things. In later Star Wars we see the supernatural Emperor. You also have a series like Andor, which is just about the Empire as this tyrannical bureaucracy. We see the actual human beings who are cogs in that machine and feel a sympathy for why they’re doing what they’re doing. It’s trying to do both things, sometimes successfully, sometimes not.

Let’s start with this article by Daniel Effron here, we’ll put in a link to the show notes, about why good people do bad things. He’s an ethicist. He’s really talking about we think that people would make a logical decision about the cost and benefits of breaking some rule, transgressing in some way, but they really don’t. Mostly, it’s not about the act itself. They’re doing things or not doing things based on how they’re going to be perceived by others. It’s that the spectator thing is a major factor. If they can do something without feeling like a bad person, they will do it. Cheating is not just about whether you can get away with it. It’s how will you feel if you do this thing.

**Craig:** Which is really fascinating when you consider it in the context of a traditional existentialist point of view, which is that we are defined solely by our deeds, the things we do. It doesn’t matter how you feel. If you do something bad, you are a bad-doer. That is true to an extent, meaning the rest of the world doesn’t necessarily care why you killed that person, as long as it wasn’t self-defense. He made you nuts, and you couldn’t handle it anymore, and you killed him. You had perfectly good reasons in your head. The rest of the world doesn’t care. You killed him. You’re a murderer.

What is interesting about our villains is often there’s a phrase that you and I have heard executives say four billion times, mustache twirling. The mustache-twirling villain is a reference to the old silent films where the bad guy in the Old West would steal the good guy’s gal, and he would tie her to the railroad tracks for some reason.

**John:** Why would he tie her to the railroad tracks?

**Craig:** I don’t know.

**John:** I never understood that.

**Craig:** Because he wants her to die but he can’t do it himself. He would rather watch a train do it, I guess. That train will be arriving at some point. He never checks the timetables or anything. He ties her to the rails, which actually is probably very difficult to do. Then he waits. While she’s like, “Please, no,” he has this nasty

Mustache with little handlebars at the end, and he twirls them and goes, “Meh-heh-heh.” It’s just shorthand for an incredibly broad villain. Broad villains don’t worry about feeling like a bad person. They are a bad person, and they are celebrating it. They love it, which is actually not very recognizably human. It’s just not a human thing to be like, “Oh my god, you know what I want to do today? Something bad, because I love being bad!” That’s not really how it functions, generally speaking.

**John:** We’ve talked many times about character motivation, villain motivation, and how every villain tends to see themselves as the hero, if they even have a sense of moral compass at all. We’re leaving out of this conversation these supernatural alien creatures, the degree to which we can apply motivation to those kind of characters.

In Aliens, we see that it’s a mother against a mother. That makes sense. That tracks. We can understand that. In most of these supernatural, demonic things, there’s not really a moral choice there. They are actually just true villains. Even the slasher villains, we might throw some screen time just setting up what their past trauma was that’s made them this way, but we don’t really believe that they have any fundamental choice. They’re not choosing to do these actions.

**Craig:** They made a choice. The choice was made. It is now complete. Freddy Krueger was burnt by a Lynch mob. He made a choice in his supernatural return to come back and kill all the children of the people that killed him. He’s good. He doesn’t wake up going, “What should I do today?” He’s like, “Good. One more day to do the thing I decided to do, that I will do every day. Ha ha.”

**John:** Aha.

**Craig:** There’s a wonderful clarity to being that kind of villain, isn’t there?

**John:** It is. In some ways, you could say that he’s cursed. Basically, he’s living out this thing. He can’t escape this. He can’t choose to get out of this. A curse is the opposite of a wish. We always talk about what is a character’s want, what are they actually going for. The curse is the mirror opposite of that. They are bound by fate to do this thing, and they can’t get away from it. There’s a kind of freedom in that.

**Craig:** There is, because as a human, you’re really more of a shark. There are no more choices to make. There’s no questioning of self. Sharks kill. When I say shark, I mean the fictional shark, not the regular sharks that probably are like, “I’m full. I’m not going to do anything.” You are a creature that is designed to kill, and thus you must kill. You are more like a beast than a person.

Those characters often do feel like they become part of nature. Zombies, whether they’re slow or fast, whether it’s a virus or it’s supernatural, they ultimately are will-less. They are compelled to do what they do. They make no choices. Thus they become a little bit like a storm, flood, lightning, fire, monsters, the devil, these things that just simply do stuff.

There’s a wonderful place for those kinds of things, but I think ultimately we do want villains that feel like they are reflecting something back at us, that they are dark mirrors that say, “Hey, you might feel these things. Don’t end up like me.” They are almost designed to be negative instructors to make people identify with the villain, to make us understand why the villain’s doing what they’re doing, to make us think, “I actually have felt the same things, I’ve wanted to do the same things, but here’s what happens if I do,” because typically, the villain will fail.

**John:** Let’s talk about some villains. I have a list of 20 villains here for us to go through. Let’s talk about what’s driving them and what’s interesting and what could be applied to other things. We’ll start with Hans Gruber from Die Hard, our special Die Hard episode. Of all the folks in this list, he’s maybe come actually closest to seeming like the mustache-twisting villain because of that amazing performance. His actual motivations are more calculating. He doesn’t seem to be just cruel for the sake of being cruel.

**Craig:** He’s a thief. He wants to steal money. That’s as far as I remember. Is there a greater motivation than that? It just seems like he’s a very arrogant man who wants to steal a lot of money and doesn’t mind killing a bunch of people to do it.

**John:** He gets indignant when somebody gets in his way. He will lash out when his plans are forded. I think of him, just because of that performance, as being grand and theatrical, but actually, he has a purpose and a focus. Also, I think he very brilliantly, in the course of the structure of movies… We talked about the false idea of what the actual motivation is is great. It seems like they have some sort of noble purpose beyond the money, and of course they don’t. It’s all just a ruse.

**Craig:** That was a wonderful thing that happened. It was a very meta thing. For us growing up, that was a startling one, because we had become so trained to think of these villains as people who were taking hostages. Terrorists are an easy one. They’re always taking hostages. They often in bad movies were taking hostages because they were associated with, like they made fun of in Tropic Thunder, Flaming Dragon, just some rebel group that was trying to do a thing.

The fact that Hans Gruber used that against us to make us think that’s what he was doing, and then the big surprise was, “No, I’m simply a thief,” was actually quite clever. Alan Rickman, I think his performance in no small part elevated what that character was into something that felt a little bit more wonderfully arch.

**John:** Let’s talk about the two villains in Silence of the Lambs. You have Buffalo Bill, who’s the serial killer, kidnapping people. You have Hannibal Lecter, who is also a serial killer, but a very different kind of serial killer. They’re two monsters, but with very different motivations. They’re very different fill-ins in the course of the story. How do we police them, and how do we think about what’s driving them?

**Craig:** Buffalo Bill to me, because he’s portrayed as somebody with a severe mental illness that has led him to do these terrible things, is more in the shark territory. He is beyond choice. He’s no longer making choices. He is simply compelled to do what he does and will continue to do it until he’s stopped. There’s nobody who’s going to have a sit-down with Buffalo Bill, and he’s going to be like, “You’re making a really good point. I’m going to stop killing all these people.” He’s not going to do that.

Hannibal Lecter you get the sense absolutely has choices. What is presented in his character that Thomas Harris created that’s so beautiful is the notion that he might be some kind of avenging angel, that maybe he only does horrible things to the people that deserve it. What’s interesting about the story is they tease you with that, but then what do they tell you? They tell you that he bit a nurse’s face off. We see him killing two police officers that didn’t do anything to him. He kills a guy in an ambulance. He will kill indiscriminately do protect himself.

As Jodie Foster as Clarice says at the end of the movie, she doesn’t think he’s going to come kill her because it would be rude. We get fascinated by the notion of the serial killer with a little bit of a conscience. It tempts us to think if we were interesting and good enough and cool enough, he wouldn’t want to kill us.

**John:** Damien in The Omen, a terrifying little child. To me, he feels like he’s cursed with that. He’s not made a single choice. He is who he is.

**Craig:** He’s bad to the bone.

**John:** Born into it, as opposed to Amy Dunn in Gone Girl, who I think is one of the best, most recent villains. She is aware of what she’s doing. She is a sociopath. She has some sort of narcissistic… I don’t want to say narcissistic personality disorder. I wouldn’t want to diagnose her with that specifically. She has some ability that puts her at the very center of the universe and sees everyone else around her as things to be manipulated.

**Craig:** Why we are fascinated by Amy Dunn is because her conniving and manipulation and calculations are very well done, so she’s formidable. This is something that you’ll hear often in Hollywood from executives. They want the villain to be formidable. They want us to feel like it’s really hard to win against somebody like that. I think also there’s a little bit of a wish fulfillment there, because she is occupying a place in society that typically isn’t in charge, isn’t the one that comes out on top. We get to watch the underdog go a little crazy and win to an extent. That’s always fascinating to me.

**John:** I think the other brilliant choice Gillian Flynn made in the structure of this is that ultimately she becomes a victim herself in breaking free of all this stuff. In executing her plan, she ends up becoming trapped by someone that she shouldn’t have trusted and then has to break herself out. We see, “You think you’ve caught me, but I’ve actually caught you,” is ingenious, so smartly done.

**Craig:** I’m not locked in here with you. You’re locked in here with me!

**John:** Gordon Gekko in Wall Street, a whole generation of young men thought that he was the hero of the movie Wall Street.

**Craig:** Oh, bros.

**John:** Yes, bros. I think it comes back down to his idea that greed is good. There’s more to it than that one speech, but essentially that whatever it takes is what’s worth doing. That is an American value, but it’s pushed to an extreme degree.

**Craig:** Which is the point. When you mention the Daniel Effron article, the average person cares a lot about feeling and appearing virtuous. If they can do bad things without feeling like a bad person, that’s when they start doing bad things. What Gordon Gekko is doing is essentially giving himself license to commit crimes. The license is through philosophy, that in fact he’s helping people. If you think about it, really I’m the hero. Somebody naturally is like, “You really convinced yourself of this.”

We always wonder when Gordon Gekko puts his head on the pillow, does he really believe that. Is there some piece of his conscience gnawing at him? We don’t know. That is a great example of somebody articulating a value that we all have ad absurdum to force us to examine ourselves.

**John:** Alonzo Harris in Training Day, Denzel Washington’s character in Training Day. An amazing performance, an amazing villain, amazing centerpiece role. Here he is in a position of power inside a structure, but of course, that’s not his true source of power. His true source of power and wealth is all the ways he’s subverting all that and breaking the codes to do this and is now trying to entrap Ethan Hawke’s character in what he’s doing.

**Craig:** An excellent film. What I remember feeling when I watched Denzel’s portrayal of Alonzo, was that he was managing to do two things at once that are very different and difficult to do simultaneously. He was letting us engage in a power fantasy, because it’s attractive. He made it look sexy and fun and awesome. The idea that if you go through life having the upper hand and being able to get over on anyone, it’s exciting.

On the other hand, he also showed you the terrible cost of it, that in fact, like I said, there’s no free lunch, that you cannot engage in power like that without it hollowing you out and gnawing at the foundations of who you are as a person until finally you’re brought low. It’s inevitable. You will come down to earth. Gravity applies to you. It’s wonderful. It’s a great lesson, which is why I think Training Day is one of the great titles of all time. It’s just such a great lesson. We’re all getting trained about the danger of having that kind of power.

**John:** We should put that on the shortlist for a future deep dive, because it’s been a while since I watched it. Two more I want to go through. Gollum from The Lord of the Rings movies.

**Craig:** Aw.

**John:** Gollum, I think he’s unique on this list, because you pity him, and yet he’s also a villain. He’s also dangerous. There are other examples of that. They’re usually sidekick characters. Here he is in this centerpiece role where he has control over this little section of what the characters need and yet he’s pathetic. It’s just such an interesting choice.

**Craig:** Gollum to me is not a villain. Gollum is an addict. He is somebody who is portraying an addiction. He will do bad things to feed his addiction. Where Gollum takes off and becomes somebody really interesting is when he is a split personality, when he’s Slinker and Stinker, and you can see him arguing with himself. That is so human. It’s just so wonderfully… We can identify. We feel bad for him, because we know that inside, there’s somebody who is good, who was a great, perfectly fine guy until he shot up heroin for the first time, and then that was it. He’s essentially been enslaved to his own addiction and his own weakness.

**John:** I think that’s the reason why we can relate to him so well is because we can see, oh, the worry that if I were to do those things, I could be trapped the same way that he is trapped. I’ll put a link in the show notes to this article about Wile E. Coyote. It’s arguing essentially Wile E. Coyote is an addict. He’s demonstrating all the addict’s things. He’s going to keep trying to do the same thing, even though it’s never going to work. It’s always going to blow up in his face, a different form of the thing. He’s always chasing that high, which is the roadrunner. If he thinks he can get it, he won’t get it.

**Craig:** It’s rough, man. He needs a program.

**John:** He does need a program, 12 steps there. Finally, let’s talk about Annie Wilkes in Misery, who I think is just a spectacular character. You look at the setup of her, and that if she did not kidnap somebody and do the things she does in the movie, she would just be an obsessive fan. She would just be someone, you know her, you understand her. She’s annoying, but she also probably bakes really well. You get along fine with her. It’s that worry that you push somebody, given the chance, some of these people would go too far and they would Annie Wilkes you.

**Craig:** That’s a portrait of obsession and love gone bad. What was so fascinating about Annie Wilkes, and Stephen King was so smart to make her a woman, is that in society we see men doing this all the time. Men become confused by their love for someone or they think they love someone. It becomes an obsession which turns violent and possessive and often deadly. Women are very often the victims. Here, what was so fascinating was to see a woman engaging in that very same power trip and obsession.

I remember at the time thinking that the only thing that held me back from love, love, loving Misery was that Annie Wilkes did seem like an impossible person. There was part of me that was like, “No one’s really like that.” Now we have Twitter, and we know that there are. Stephen King was right.

**John:** She’s out there.

**Craig:** Oh my god, she and he. There are many Annie and Andrew Wilkeses out there who attach themselves so strongly to characters. The whole thing kicks off when her favorite author dares to kill her favorite character. She reads it in the book, and she snaps. We have seen that a lot in popular culture. That form of love that has gone sour, that has curdled into obsession, is something that’s very human. The story of that villainry is you must get away from that person, because they are going to destroy you to essentially mend their own broken heart. That’s terrifying.

**John:** It’s fascinating to think, would Annie Wilkes be a villain if she had not stumbled upon that car crash? Is this the only bad thing that she’s done?

**Craig:** I would imagine that she’s probably done a few other things, but nothing like that.

**John:** This transaction would not have happened if not for fate putting him right there. If the book had come out, and she would’ve read the book, she would’ve been upset. She would’ve been angry for weeks. She probably wouldn’t have stalked him down at his house and done a thing. The fact that she could affect a change because she had the book before it came out was the opportunity.

**Craig:** The woman was definitely off to begin with. Anybody that says dirty birdy as a phrase, you can imagine people are like, “Here comes Annie.” She’s gotten into some pretty nasty fights at the post office, but nothing like this.

**John:** Let’s try to wrap this up with some takeaways here. As we’re talking about these villains, I think it’s important for us to stress that we’re looking at what’s motivating these iconic villains in these stories. These iconic villains are great, but they wouldn’t exist if you didn’t find a hero to put opposite them, if you didn’t find a context for which to see them in, because they can’t just float by themselves. You can’t have Hannibal Lecter in a story or Buffalo Bill in a story without a Clarice Starling to be the connective tissue, to be the person who’s letting us into their world.

I see so often people try to creating this iconic villain who has this grand motivation. Terrific. Who are we following into the story? How are we getting there? How are we exploring this? How are we hopefully defeating the villain at the end of this?

**Craig:** We need somebody to identify with. We don’t want to identify with villains, but I will suggest that if you can find moments where people are challenged to identify with the villains, that’s when things get really interesting to me, because there is a kind of story where we just give up on the whole hero, villain thing entirely. We ask ourselves, in these situations, what would you do?

When people start to drift away from the hero and towards the villain, that’s when their relationship with the material becomes a little bit more complex. It doesn’t mean it’s better. Sometimes I like nice, simple relationships with the things I watch and read, but sometimes I do like them messy. I like a messy relationship sometimes as well.

**John:** I thought Black Panther, the Killmonger character was a great messy relationship with Black Panther, because they both had strong points. While we wanted Killmonger defeated, we always say, “You know what? He was making some logical points there.”

**Craig:** He’s a good example of gone too far.

**John:** Indeed. Let’s do two quick listener questions. Drew, help us out.

**Drew:** Ida asks, “I’m having issues when it comes to establishing basic things about characters, especially choosing a career for them in stories where the profession doesn’t necessarily affect the story but I do need to see them in their workplace. Any tips on making this kind of decision?”

**John:** Listen. I’m assuming that you’re writing the kind of story where there’s a workplace but the workplace is not the important central point. We’re going to see them there, but that’s not where we’re spending most of our time. Get them someplace visual where they can talk. If [inaudible 00:45:36] get them a place where they can talk, where we can see them moving around through a space, if they’re supposed to working with other people.

If they’re supposed to be working by themselves, think of some sort of craft kind of thing where as an artist, an artisan, as a solo worker, as a cabinet maker, where we can see them in an individual space. I would just say look for something that’s interesting and distinctive but not so distracting that it becomes the focus of the movie. Craig, any tips for Ida here?

**Craig:** I guess, Ida, it does sound like because their profession doesn’t necessarily affect the story, that you’re probably going to be looking for something fairly mundane. If you can tell me anything about her character from the place she works… Let’s just start with, how much money does she make? How much money do you want her to have? What’s her education level? Has she given up on things? Is she coasting? Is her dream to be a this, so this is just a day job that she’s doing while she has to, for money? All those character things should lead you towards a general sort of thing. Then make a list of all the things that are like that, that fit in that, that you’ve seen in movies before, and don’t do any of them.

Now take a walk around your town. Look for weird things, candle shops, psychic palm readings, a place that repairs vacuum cleaners. Whatever it is that you could also imagine somebody else being in there that might be an interesting bounce-off character or some comic relief or a place where she might have to confront a customer asking for something annoying. These are the things that I think help you get specific.

A great example is, in Better Call Saul, Vince Gilligan needed to establish this mundane life for Saul Goodman. He could’ve picked all sorts of places, but he picked manager of a Cinnabon, not just employee at a Cinnabon, manager, which is worse than employee, because employees come and go. The manager, that’s his career. His career is Cinnabon.

By the way, if you’re a manager at a Cinnabon, I’m sure you’re doing fine. I’m not making fun of you. If you were a lawyer that was on top of the criminal world of Albuquerque, and now you’re a manager at Cinnabon, you can see how things have changed dramatically for you in a very specific way. That’s what you’re hoping for is something that feeds back into our understanding of who this person is and where they are in their life.

**John:** I would just emphasize that when we say pick a mundane job, that doesn’t mean boring. It can be boring for them, but it can’t be boring for us. There’s nothing worse than seeing a boring workplace where it’s just like, this is a boring scene because we’re in a boring place. Make sure that whatever you’re picking is going to be able to keep the ball in the air, so the scenes that do need to take place wherever they’re working actually can still land and that will make it so the movie won’t get cut because it’s dull.

**Craig:** Agreed.

**John:** Drew, one more question.

**Drew:** A WGA Member asks, “Has the Guild ever tried to force studios to pay penalties to writers for late payments? It’s often a months-long wait between delivering a script and receiving payment.”

**John:** A WGA Member, yes, they do have to pay. They have to pay a penalty per week or per month. There’s a percentage penalty too for that stuff.

**Craig:** I think it’s weekly. There is an interest rate that compounds. The Guild has not ever, forget tried to force studios, first of all, force is the wrong word, compel studios or require studios to adhere to the terms of the contract they’ve signed with us. The Guild has an entire department that does nothing but this and has successfully collected millions of dollars on behalf of writers.

**John:** Millions and millions of dollars.

**Craig:** Millions and millions over the course of decades.

**John:** We’ll put a link in the show notes to the Late Pay Desk. I have friends who work in that desk. All they do is just go after writers’ money. Here are pros and cons. The pro is you have to speak up and say, “Hey, this person owes me money. Go get my money,” and they will go get your money. It can be tough for a writer to raise their hand and say, “Hey, this is a problem here.” The writer can do that. Also, you have reps. Your reps are theoretically only getting paid when you’re getting paid. Send your reps on this.

I think so often as writers we feel like we need to be meek and not make waves, but if people owe you money, they should pay you money. Not only is there structures in place for the WGA, but there are structures in place as a system that you should be getting paid. If you’re not getting paid, it’s outrageous, so speak up.

**Craig:** Understand, no matter how cool your agent or your lawyer is, your lawyer has 5% of the total amount of caring about that money coming in, your agent has 10% of the total amount of caring, and you have the rest, 85%.

Also, they probably have more money than you do. The agency is a large business. The lawyer’s working for a large firm. This money means way more to you than it means to them. They don’t really actually care if the money comes in a month or two late. They don’t care, but you do, because maybe you need it for rent. You can try and say to them, “Listen, this is really important that I get paid on time.” They have to work with that studio for all of their clients. It’s much easier for them to go, “It’s fine.” The Guild does have a dedicated department that just handles this stuff.

**John:** I will say that I suspect you are a feature writer, because it’s feature writers who are classically not getting paid on time. That’s just what it is. Sometimes pilot writers, but really it’s feature writers. Time for our One Cool Things. My One Cool Thing is an article by Jennifer Senior. It’s in The Atlantic. The headline is The Puzzling Gap Between How Old You Are and How Old You Think You Are. Craig, I’m going to ask you, in your head, how old are you?

**Craig:** Oh, man. It depends. Sometimes I’m 14, and sometimes I’m 51.

**John:** The phrasing of the question ends up being important, because they’ve done studies on it. If they ask how old you are in your head versus how old you feel, you get different kinds of answers from people, because there’s definitely days where I feel 50, but I would say consistently I do feel like I’m probably 31, 32 at a place. The studies they’ve done on this, it looks like people anchor themselves about 20% younger than their actual chronological age. They tend to peg themselves back at a moment where they feel like they are themselves, the first version that they were themselves.

**Craig:** That’s interesting.

**John:** It’s after you’ve had your first kiss, first foray out into the world without your parents’ supervision. You feel like an adult with most stuff figured out. That tends to be the moment. Going back to our villains discussion, people who have big traumas in their past tend to get stuck at those ages too. It’s a good article overview of this mental self-perception of how old you think you are. What can be useful for people who are in their 20s or early 30s is that the people who are in their 40s, 50s, and 60s, internally they still think of themselves likely as closer to your age than you would guess. Useful.

**Craig:** It is. I’m not a huge backwards-looking person. What I do know is that no matter what age I perceive myself to be, while I have changed in certain clear and I think positive ways since I was, say, 35, I haven’t changed that much. I’m still basically who I was, whereas when you’re coming up, you’re changing a lot.

I remember when I was in my 20s, looking at people who were in their 30s and feeling, “Okay, you’re a little bit older. You seem like you’re more settled down and established. I’m a bit jealous of that kind of peace.” People in their 50s were just old. The truth is, those people in the 50s did not probably feel any different than the people in their 30s. They really didn’t. I don’t feel that different.

There is a wisdom that comes with age. It’s weird. I don’t feel old, but I know that the people I work with, who are much younger than I am, look at me and think, “Old,” like parent old, which is fascinating.

**John:** The parent thing is really interesting, because at a certain point, I realized, “Oh, I’m now older than my parents were at this point.” It’s weird, because I always think of them as being older. When I was a kid, they were not any older than I am currently right now. That’s strange to me. I forgive them more.

**Craig:** How old was your dad when he passed away?

**John:** My dad was 67.

**Craig:** At some point, you’re going to hit 68.

**John:** For sure.

**Craig:** That’s going to be interesting, because you’ll know an age that he didn’t even know, which is fascinating. I have this memory of my mother throwing a surprise 40th birthday party for my dad. That just seemed like the most faraway number possible. That’s in my rearview mirror by a decade. Time.

**John:** Time, time.

**Craig:** It’s so weird.

**John:** I have this very distinct memory. We went camping every summer. We were in the trailer. I asked my mom how old she was. She’s like, “I’m turning 37.” That number anchored for me. It’s just wild to think, oh, wow, she was actually a 37-year-old. That doesn’t feel that old to me.

**Craig:** If you were with a 37-year-old right now, you’d be like, “They’re on their way up.” So strange.

**John:** Absolutely.

**Craig:** It’s so weird.

**John:** You’ve got one here.

**Craig:** I’ve got my One Cool Thing, which is gonna feed directly into our Bonus Segment. My One Cool Thing is a woman named Yeono, Y-E-O-N-O. That’s a combination of her full name. She is a tattoo artist from South Korea. Just side note about South Korea. Tattooing, you have to have a medical license to do it.

**John:** Wow.

**Craig:** The legal structure is really designed to discourage tattoo work. A lot of South Korean artists come to the US to work. Yeono gave me a tattoo. I think it’s amazing. She was a lovely person and an artist and meticulous, which I thought was wonderful. She has a particular style, which is photorealism. If you are in the LA area, or I believe she also works out of Brooklyn, so she goes back and forth, and you are looking for a photorealistic tattoo done by a very obsessive, very careful, attention to detail type person, then you should take a look at some of the work that Yeono has done. She’s terrific.

**John:** Fantastic. That was our show for this week. Scriptnotes is produced by Drew Marquardt, with help from Chris Csont. It’s edited by Matthew Chilelli. Outro this week is by Dilo Gold. If you have an outro, you can send us a link to ask@johnaugust.com. That’s also the place where you could send questions. You can find the show notes for this episode and all episodes at johnaugust.com. That’s also where you’ll find transcripts and sign up for our weeklyish newsletter called Inneresting, which has lots of links to things about writing. We have T-shirts and hoodies, and they’re great. You can find them at Cotton Bureau. You can sign up to become a Premium member at scriptnotes.net, where you get all of the back-episodes and Bonus Segments. Craig, Drew, thanks for a fun show.

**Craig:** Thank you, John.

**Drew:** Thanks, John.

[Bonus Segment]

**John:** Craig, last Wednesday you came over to the house, and we were gonna play some DnD. You had on your arm a dagger. I asked, and you showed it to me. I said, “Oh, how long is that gonna last?” You said, “Forever.” The reason I asked how long is that gonna last is because it looked like a sticker transfer thing, because it was so incredibly photorealistic, and your skin was not all puffy and red in a way. I assumed you just applied a sticker to your forearm, but no, you’d gotten a genuine tattoo.

**Craig:** It’s actually a switchblade. Neil Druckmann and I made an oath when we were making The Last of Us. We said, “If this show works,” and we define works vaguely as either got good reviews or a lot of people watched it or both, that we would each get a tattoo of Ellie’s switchblade. She stabs a lot of people with her switchblade. It’s cool. The show worked.

**John:** The show worked.

**Craig:** I followed through. Neil has not yet followed through, I would like to point out.

**John:** Coward.

**Craig:** He is. He says he’s gonna. He’s waffling a bit about the design he wants, which I understand. I’m just going to continually shame him until he gets it. Regardless, it was my first tattoo. I’ve never had one before. I never really wanted one, but this felt significant. This was a long process. I cared very much about it. It just seemed like I had earned it in a way. I knew I wanted a photorealistic tattoo, which is why I find Yeono. The process was fascinating. I enjoyed it, actually, quite a bit.

**John:** The advice I gave to you on that night, and which other people around the table echoed, is you have to wait at least another year before you get another tattoo, because inevitably, people get a tattoo, and the experience is so cool that they want a second tattoo and a third tattoo and they end up with a bunch of dumb tattoos all over their bodies. I have so many friends who that has happened to.

**Craig:** I will try to avoid that. I think if another season of The Last of Us does well, I’ll probably get another one for that. I like the idea of tattoos commemorating large events, as opposed to just, “I want a dolphin on my ankle.”

**John:** I have exactly one tattoo. I got it 30 years ago. I was in the Stark Program at USC. Friends came down from San Francisco to visit. We were out on Venice Beach. They all had a bunch of tattoos. I said, “You know what? I really want to get a tattoo.” We went to the tattoo place, and I got the one tattoo. It’s on my ankle. It was great.

**Craig:** Is it a dolphin? Please tell me it’s a dolphin.

**John:** It’s a dolphin on my ankle. No, it is an abbreviation of a Latin phrase, tibbium nihil, imagus quiddum, which is, “Let me fear nothing, not even fear,” which was just a mantra I wanted to live by and honestly, genuinely helpful way of thinking about things. Most of the stuff in my life that I’ve regretted are the things I regretted not doing, that fear kept me from doing, and so to be less fearful of things ahead. It was good, useful advice.

It hurt like hell on my ankle. We can talk about this, Craig. It’s a very sharp, very specific pain, in a way that is so different than other pain, because I can see why it hurts, and it doesn’t bother me, because it’s just a very sharp pain at that spot. I know it’s not actually bad for me or my body. It’s not a warning sign the way I think pain generally is.

**Craig:** There are different parts of the body that respond differently. Interestingly, men and women have different responses in general to certain areas of the body. There are areas where men are more sensitive. There are areas where women are more sensitive. It’s curious. The ankle is a tough one. There are areas by joints, basically. When you’re dealing with joints, those tend to be more sensitive. Then the ribs apparently are the worst. That’s what I was reading.

**John:** I can absolutely see that.

**Craig:** The tattoo that I got is on my forearm, on the inside of my forearm, which is, generally speaking, one of the less painful places to get a tattoo, particularly if you can avoid getting close to the wrist or the inner elbow.

The pain, which I was obviously curious about, it was fascinating. It reminded me initially of a little bit of the pain of an electric shock, a steady electrical current, because there is a vibration to it. It’s like a vibration and a scratching at the same time, but I didn’t mind it, and that’s a good thing, because as you said, my tattoo is this photorealistic image of a switchblade. It took nine hours to do that. If it had been excruciating for nine hours, I think I would’ve lost my mind.

Honestly, the part that was the most annoying physically was that the position my arm had to be in on the table for her was slightly rotated to give her a flat inner arm surface. After a few hours, my shoulder started getting really stiff. I would take little breaks and just move my shoulder around and then hand the human canvas back to her.

Here’s an insight into me, John. About seven hours in, she’s like, “When it’s a long tattoo, when it takes a long time, I give my clients a little massage just to loosen them up, because they’ve been tight the whole time.” I said, “That’s right.” She gave me this wonderful shoulder, scalp massage. It felt great. That said, I was so much more comfortable being hurt than I was being helped. There’s something about people making me feel good that makes me feel uncomfortable and something about people hurting me that feels great. I can’t imagine why. Nothing happened to me.

**John:** Nothing to unpack there. Nothing.

**Craig:** Nope. We will not open the box full of bad stuff. I thought it was a fascinating process. Here’s where I’m at now. It’s been basically a week since I’ve had it. It is healing beautifully. There’s no more redness, happily no signs of infection or anything like that. I’m in the skin flaking stage.

From a medical point of view, what happens is the top layer of skin is going to heal faster than the lower layers of the epidermis. The top layer of skin is now healing. The way it’s healing is by flaking away the dead skin as the new skin on top regenerates. The skin underneath is still putting itself together. From what I understand, once all this sunburn style flaky stuff flakes away, the tattoo will then look a bit blah for another couple of weeks. After about a month from the beginning of the tattoo to then, things should be back to where they were when I first showed it to you, which was fresh and startling and vivid.

**John:** Craig, what is your opinion of actors having tattoos? I actually have some strong opinions about this, but I’m curious what your instinct is, because obviously, all human beings should be free to adorn themselves however they want to adorn themselves. I find it really frustrating when actors have a bunch of tattoos. I look at them like, “Man, we are going to have to get around a lot of your tattoos, because they do not fit in the world of our movie.”

**Craig:** I actually don’t mind it, as long as there’s not a facial tattoo. If there’s a tattoo and your face, that’s a disaster. Everywhere else on the body, if something is not covered by clothing, our makeup artists were extraordinarily good at covering up little tattoos or large ones. It didn’t take that much more time in the morning, obviously. The bigger issue is copyright, as it turns out, which is something Warner Bros found out when we made the second Hangover movie.

**John:** That’s right.

**Craig:** Tattoo artists that design original artwork are protected like the rest of us, under copyright. They own the copyright. If you’re going to put that on film, we need to clear it. Nick Offerman, for instance, has a tattoo. In our third episode, there’s a moment where he emerges and he’s wearing a towel but nothing on top, so you can see his chest, and he has a tattoo. He had already been in something where that tattoo had been visible, so he had already handled the whole clearance thing. I think he had gotten the artist to basically sign something that said, “I am licensing you to do this wherever you want to do it on camera.”

When it’s a new one, when it’s a fresh one, you do have to ask, and we have to get approvals and sometimes negotiate some fees. That part can actually be more annoying than the extra 10 minutes, because here’s the deal. If it takes 10 minutes to cover that tattoo up, we’re just calling the actor in 10 minutes earlier. It’s on them. They’re just going to be a little bit earlier on their call time to get that covered up. It doesn’t bother me too much.

**John:** As an actor, you’re appearing in TV shows, you’ll have to decide are you wearing some long sleeves, are you covering that up, are you getting a license from Yeono for perpetuity.

**Craig:** Here’s the interesting thing. I haven’t actually talked about this with her, but I’m going to. I’m going to go and see her again after a month, because she’s gonna look at it and see how it’s gone. She may want to touch up a couple of spots, depending on how it’s all healed.

The interesting thing about this tattoo is the artwork is basically a direct duplication of the artwork from the game, because I gave her these digital files of images of the switchblade that was originally designed for the game The Last of Us. Other artists had done this. Technically, I probably should’ve gotten permission from Sony, but I didn’t. Whoops. Sorry. I don’t think she would have the copyright on this, because essentially, this is a derivative work.

**John:** It’s derivative work. It could also arguably be work for hire. I’m curious how that’ll [crosstalk 01:07:40].

**Craig:** It could be, but I did not impose any of that paperwork upon her. There is an interesting legal question about how to handle this particular tattoo. You know what? I’m going to find out, because I’m going to be doing a little actoring on a show, not Mythic Quest, but a different show, in a month or so. I better dig into that or wear a long-sleeve shirt, but I don’t want to.

**John:** You don’t want to. You want to wear a Scriptnotes T-shirt. We cleared the Scriptnotes T-shirts for when you were on Mythic Quest.

**Craig:** Sweet.

**John:** You’re set for that. Sweet.

**Craig:** Nice.

**John:** Craig, congratulations on your tattoo.

**Craig:** Thank you.

**John:** Don’t get another one at least until Episode, let’s say-

**Craig:** Oh, god.

**John:** … 650.

**Craig:** Good lord. Okay, I give you my word.

**John:** Thanks. Bye.

Links:

* [Amtel Systems](amtel.com)
* [The U.S. military’s Hollywood connection](https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2011-aug-21-la-ca-military-movies-20110821-story.html) by Rebecca Keegan for Los Angeles Times
* [How E-girl influencers are trying to get Gen Z into the military](https://www.dazeddigital.com/life-culture/article/57878/1/the-era-of-military-funded-e-girl-warfare-army-influencers-tiktok) by Günseli Yalcinkaya for DAZED
* [Warren Beatty Appears in Bizarre Dick Tracy TCM Special in Apparent Film-Rights Ploy](https://www.tvinsider.com/1081220/dick-tracy-special-tracy-zooms-in-warren-beatty-tcm/) by Dan Clarendon
* [The 1000 Deaths of Wile E. Coyote](https://thanksforlettingmeshare.substack.com/p/the-1000-deaths-of-wile-e-coyote) by T.B.D.
* [Why do good people do bad things?](https://ethics.org.au/good-people-bad-deeds/) by Daniel Effron
* [Why some people are willing to challenge behavior they see as wrong despite personal risk](https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/why-some-people-are-willing-to-challenge-bad-behavior-despite-personal-risk) by Catherine A. Sanderson
* [WGAw Late Pay Desk](https://secure.wga.org/contracts/enforcement/get-paid-on-time/writers/contact)
* [The Puzzling Gap Between How Old You Are and How Old You Think You Are](https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2023/04/subjective-age-how-old-you-feel-difference/673086/) by Jennifer Senior for The Atlantic
* [Tattoo artist Yeono](https://www.10kftattoo.com/team/yeono/)
* [Craig’s Tattoo](https://www.instagram.com/p/CpEtzF6uC3L/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link)
* [Get a Scriptnotes T-shirt!](https://cottonbureau.com/people/scriptnotes-podcast)
* [Check out the Inneresting Newsletter](https://inneresting.substack.com/)
* [Gift a Scriptnotes Subscription](https://scriptnotes.supportingcast.fm/gifts) or [treat yourself to a premium subscription!](https://scriptnotes.supportingcast.fm/)
* [Craig Mazin](https://www.instagram.com/clmazin/) on Instagram
* [John August](https://twitter.com/johnaugust) on Twitter
* [John on Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/johnaugust/?hl=en)
* [John on Mastodon](https://mastodon.art/@johnaugust)
* [Outro](http://johnaugust.com/2013/scriptnotes-the-outros) by Dilo Gold ([send us yours!](http://johnaugust.com/2014/outros-needed))
* Scriptnotes is produced by [Drew Marquardt](https://www.instagram.com/marquardtam/) with help from [Chris Csont](https://twitter.com/ccsont) and edited by [Matthew Chilelli](https://twitter.com/machelli).

Email us at ask@johnaugust.com

You can download the episode [here](http://traffic.libsyn.com/scriptnotes/590standard.mp3).

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Newsletter

Inneresting Logo A Quote-Unquote Newsletter about Writing
Read Now

Explore

Projects

  • Aladdin (1)
  • Arlo Finch (27)
  • Big Fish (88)
  • Birdigo (2)
  • Charlie (39)
  • Charlie's Angels (16)
  • Chosen (2)
  • Corpse Bride (9)
  • Dead Projects (18)
  • Frankenweenie (10)
  • Go (30)
  • Karateka (4)
  • Monsterpocalypse (3)
  • One Hit Kill (6)
  • Ops (6)
  • Preacher (2)
  • Prince of Persia (13)
  • Shazam (6)
  • Snake People (6)
  • Tarzan (5)
  • The Nines (118)
  • The Remnants (12)
  • The Variant (22)

Apps

  • Bronson (14)
  • FDX Reader (11)
  • Fountain (32)
  • Highland (73)
  • Less IMDb (4)
  • Weekend Read (64)

Recommended Reading

  • First Person (88)
  • Geek Alert (151)
  • WGA (162)
  • Workspace (19)

Screenwriting Q&A

  • Adaptation (66)
  • Directors (90)
  • Education (49)
  • Film Industry (492)
  • Formatting (130)
  • Genres (90)
  • Glossary (6)
  • Pitches (29)
  • Producers (59)
  • Psych 101 (119)
  • Rights and Copyright (96)
  • So-Called Experts (47)
  • Story and Plot (170)
  • Television (165)
  • Treatments (21)
  • Words on the page (238)
  • Writing Process (178)

More screenwriting Q&A at screenwriting.io

© 2025 John August — All Rights Reserved.