• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

John August

  • Arlo Finch
  • Scriptnotes
  • Library
  • Store
  • About

Scriptnotes Transcript

Scriptnotes, Ep 118: Time Travel with Richard Kelly — Transcript

November 24, 2013 Scriptnotes Transcript

The original post for this episode can be found [here](http://johnaugust.com/2013/time-travel-with-richard-kelly).

**John August:** Hello and welcome. My name is John August.

**Craig Mazin:** My name is Craig Mazin.

**John:** And this is Episode 118 of Scriptnotes, the Time Travel episode of a podcast about screenwriting and things that are interesting to screenwriters.

**Craig:** Mm-hmm.

**John:** Craig, what is your favorite kind of episode of Scriptnotes?

**Craig:** It’s funny, we haven’t done one in awhile. I really like the Q&As because it allows me to be even more passive than I normally am about this podcast.

**John:** You can be as underprepared as possible.

**Craig:** Correct.

**John:** I will just read you questions and you can think of a response as I ask you the question.

**Craig:** Right. Like a little baby bird with his mouth open and regurgitated worms just drop in.

**John:** Well, my favorite type of episode is usually the ones where we have a guest on. So, ones like the Lindsay Doran episode or the Dennis Palumbo episode, or episodes like today where we have a special guest who is with us here in the “studio.” And that is Richard Kelly. He’s the director of Donnie Darko, the writer-director of Donnie Darko and Southland Tales and The Box. So, he will be joining us in a few minutes to talk about all things that we want to talk about…

**Craig:** Great. Richard Kelly.

**John:** …such as first movies, science-fiction movies, lots of stuff.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** But first we have to talk about my other favorite kind of episode which is the ones where we have a live audience. We have one of those coming up, December 19, and as promised there is now information about tickets. Tickets are going on sale tomorrow, the day after this podcast airs. Tickets are on sale November 20 at exactly 10am they promised us.

**Craig:** Okay. And who’s selling the tickets?

**John:** It is through the Writers Guild Foundation.

**Craig:** And how much are the tickets? How much do they cost?

**John:** They’re $10 each, Craig Mazin.

**Craig:** Ten dollars. Anyone can afford that.

**John:** Anyone can afford ten dollars. So, it will be a live show in the Writers Guild Theater. There will be seats and chairs. And there will be a reception beforehand. Eggnog is promised. I haven’t gotten really clarity on whether there’s alcohol involved in the eggnog reception or not.

**Craig:** Gross.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Everything about eggnog is disgusting. The name is disgusting. Both the word egg as part of a drink and then nog, which isn’t a word, and then two short syllable words ending in hard Gs, eggnog. And then what it is. Blech.

**John:** Yeah, it’s really the pumpkin spice of milk drinks. But, still, it’s going to be a good fun night. There will be you and me and special guests. Many of our previous guests will be coming to the show, but we’ll have new people who you’ve never seen before on stage with us and we will be announcing those names and I think people will be very excited by who those names are.

**Craig:** I agree.

**John:** So, the actual live show is Thursday, December 19, Writers Guild Theater. Tickets go on sale tomorrow. From experience doing our 100th episode live show, they went really, really quickly. So, we’re trying to make sure they actually go up exactly at 10am so people can get tickets and not be left out. But if you would like to come to the show, come see us then.

You and I will both tweet the URL for people to sign in and buy tickets that morning as well.

**Craig:** Great. And just to reassure me and everybody listening, we still don’t make money off this podcast, correct?

**John:** No, it’s completely a money-losing proposition.

**Craig:** Fantastic. That’s the key. If we can just stay in the red.

**John:** Yes. We will make no money off this event. The Writers Guild Foundation, which is a very good charitable organization, will make a little bit of money hopefully.

**Craig:** Oh great. Okay, well then that’s even better.

**John:** Craig, you had some housekeeping, too, today.

**Craig:** Yes. Very briefly. I took your advice from I think it was last week’s One Cool Thing and I downloaded Knock to Unlock and I’ve been using it. And I really like it a lot, but for the Knock to Unlock people if they’re listening: I don’t know if you’ve noticed this — sometimes it’s a little laggy.

**John:** Mm-hmm.

**Craig:** And so I wait, and I wait, and I wait, and I think, “Ah! I could have entered my password by now.” And then I knock on it and it doesn’t work or it registers one knock. Sometimes it works perfectly and sometimes it just doesn’t work. So, I want them to fix it, because I want it to work constantly and quickly.

**John:** Craig, I agree with you. My experience with Knock to Unlock has been sort of like on the iPhone 5S, when it works perfectly it’s really kind of magic, and when it doesn’t work it’s a little bit frustrating.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** What I have found with Knock to Unlock is when you’re on the lock screen, there’s that little circling blue light that goes around your face, your little profile picture.

**Craig:** Yes.

**John:** When it’s solid, it tends to work exactly right. When it’s still circling it’s not connecting up to your phone the right way and —

**Craig:** Takes too long. Takes too long! Make go faster.

**John:** Make go faster. So, this was Craig Mazin venting about a product rather to an audience of thousands rather than to the actual people who make the product.

**Craig:** Right. Well, I feel like I can enlist all of you out there to assault these people and to make their thing that is very cheap and awesome even better for me, because I’m impatient.

**John:** Yeah. Craig often, like this was actually my One Cool Thing. But one of the things I really respect about you is that you’ll often pick a One Cool Thing that you’ve never even tried out. You have no idea if it actually works.

**Craig:** Right. I’m adventuresome.

**John:** You are adventuresome.

**Craig:** I like to put a question mark at the end of One Cool Thing?

**John:** [laughs] Well, in the spirit of adventure, let’s go to our first and only guest today on the show, Mr. Richard Kelly.

**Craig:** Richard Kelly!

**John:** So, if we had an audience, this is where they’d be applauding.

**Richard Kelly:** Hello guys.

**John:** Now, Richard, I was trying to remember when I first met you and I’m pretty sure it was actually at the test screening, not even a real test screening, an informal screening for your film, Donnie Darko, at Flower Films.

**Richard:** It was at Flower Films. And it was in their private little screening room at their Sunset Boulevard tower offices back in probably the year 2000.

**John:** Yeah. 2000. It would be late 2000, because it was before Sundance.

**Richard:** It was before Sundance. We were on the brink of submitting to Sundance and it was one of the first screenings that we did. And it was Nancy Juvonen, and Sean McKittrick, and a few other select friends. And you were one of the very first people to see the film. I remember. And you were very helpful, I think, in your suggestions and it was a really, really amazing experience because I was just like at the very beginning of my career really.

**John:** So, at this point you had graduated from USC. And it was USC for grad school or was that undergrad for you? I forget what your history is.

**Richard:** I was undergrad. I was an undergrad production major at the School of Cinema and Television, it’s now called the School of Cinematic Arts and has a bunch of new fancy palatial digital buildings, but when I was there at the end of the ’90s graduating it was still relatively archaic.

**John:** It looked like a dentist office really. It looked like a decent dentist office somewhere in the Valley.

**Richard:** Absolutely. And there was the George Lucas Bridge where everyone used to kind of eat their Carl’s Jr. and sort of trade tips and wait for light stands and camera equipment.

**John:** So, you were a production major if I recall correctly.

**Richard:** Mm-hmm.

**John:** So, you’re a production major from USC and you wrote this script while you were still at USC, or had you already finished by that point?

**Richard:** No, I didn’t write the script until right after I graduated. I was sort of in mortal of fear of writing a screenplay all throughout the undergrad experience because I was so focused on learning how to use a camera and stage direction and lighting and all of the technique required of being a director. I was so focused on that — screenwriting was something that was in the back of my mind and it was just very terrifying to me, because I wrote a lot growing up but it was more essays, and short fiction, and short bursts of inspiration. But the idea of doing something long form was just really intimidating, and I’m the kind of person who doesn’t really try to engage in any activity that I don’t think I’m going to be good at.

So, I was just, I was terrified. And so I kind of stored it all up.

**Craig:** But then you got over this fear and wrote a script that is — it’s interesting to hear you say that this is almost the first screenplay you wrote because it’s very well structured. I mean, it must be very well structured because of the content and the kind of story you’re telling.

But there’s a rigor to the structure. It’s a very experienced kind of structure. I wonder, did you realize that you were kind of melding… — It’s funny, I rewatched Donnie Darko the other day and I thought there’s so much about it that’s non-traditional. And yet there’s so much about it that actually is traditional. They’re sort of stuck together in this fascinating thing.

Were you aware that this was going on when you were writing it?

**Richard:** I think was subconsciously aware of it. It was me storing up probably 23 years of experience, of watching and digesting stories and I believe a lot of it really came from, of all places, my high school English teachers who really sort of just pushed narrative structure into me. I mean, they really educated me in terms of that process. And I took maybe one screenwriting class at USC, but my focus was so much more on production that I actually kind of derived it from my high school education, which might sound unusual, but that’s where it kind of came from.

And you see that embedded in the themes of the story —

**Craig:** Sure.

**Richard:** You know, Drew Barrymore playing this idealistic high school teacher and the sort of — it’s a very adolescent script in terms of its innocence and its formative approach when it comes to the themes are very much a teenager’s bleeding heart so to speak.

**Craig:** Right.

**Richard:** So it was me kind of expunging my 23 years of adolescence onto the page really.

**John:** So, you’ve written this script. This is before the Black List. This is back in the day of like printed scripts that were sent around. What was the process from you finish this script to it ends up at Flower Films and you’re going to start production. What was that journey like?

**Richard:** Well, I had partnered up with my friend, and he still is my producing partner, Sean McKittrick, at our company, Darko Entertainment. But at the time he was working as an assistant at New Line Cinema. And he helped me with my graduate film and produced my graduate film. And he was working on a desk for an executive named Lynn Harris at New Line Cinema.

And I sent it to Sean. I’m like, “What do you think? I finished the script.” And he read it and he called me and said, “I need to read it a second time. It’s a little too long.” It was like 147 pages or something. “And it needs a few tweaks, but I think there’s really something here. And I really think you’re onto something.”

And then he called me back after having read it the second time and he was even more confident that I was onto something. He’s like, “Let’s trim 10 or 15 pages out and then I’m going to send it to my friend, David Ruddy, who works at CAA.” And that’s obviously the big talent agency.

And so he sent it to David and David was working as an assistant to Beth Swofford who still to this day is a huge agent at CAA. And he read it and called Sean and said, “I want to meet this guy.”

So, he took us out to drinks and Dave made sure that I wasn’t an axe murderer, or something equally deviant.

**Craig:** Which you are, I mean.

**Richard:** You saw what I did in Austin.

**Craig:** Instantly I detected. I don’t know how he missed the fact that you are absolutely a deviant axe murderer. But go ahead. Go ahead with the story about the least observant man in the world.

**Richard:** [laughs] Yeah, so he was like, “Okay, I’m going to give this script to Beth,” and then Beth read it and brought it up in a CAA staff meeting. And she gave it to three other agents, including my current agent to this day, John Campisi, and all of a sudden I was getting a call from a group of four people at CAA who called me in this sort of group conference call and said, “We love your script and we want you to come in and meet.”

And, again, I was 23 years old and living with a few friends in the South Bay making $6.5 an hour serving cappuccinos at a post production house in Hollywood. I was making cheese and cracker plates for Mark Romanek, and Madonna, and Jonas Åkerlund, and Puff Daddy. I was barely getting by and I had this film degree. So, all of a sudden to be getting a call from CAA was like a fairytale scenario.

**Craig:** Right.

**Richard:** So, I rolled in there and they wanted to sign me. And then I informed them of the unfortunate news that I was going to direct the film, and I would never let anyone else direct it. And you could see the sort of polite smiles and nods of the head. It was not going to be an easy course.

**John:** So, at this point they’ve read your Donnie Darko script. Have they read anything else?

**Richard:** No. No. That was the only thing I had.

**Craig:** That was all they could read.

**John:** And did you have a reel? Did you have anything to show them that you could direct?

**Richard:** I had my grad film, which was this really ridiculous, campy science-fiction thing that I showed them and they were like, “Oh, let’s not show that to anyone.”

**Craig:** [laughs]

**Richard:** Just because it was just so different and so campy and so — more of like just a visual exercise. And they were kind of like, “Let’s not bring that up.” And I’m like, okay, because I’m always the kind of person who sees myself as having like many different channels in terms of switching beyond into many different genres. And I’m not a person who believes in categorization or putting people into boxes. But that’s what this town is all about is keeping you in a box or keeping you in a category. So, they’re like, “Let’s put that aside”

Everyone read the script. They sent it out to all the big production companies. And I was all of a sudden meeting all of these famous producers. Just amazing people. I got to meet Paula Weinstein and Betty Thomas and Mark Johnson. And just this long list of amazing legendary producers. I got to meet Ben Stiller on the set of Mystery Men. And everyone loved my script. And everyone was saying all these wonderful things. But, after six months of meetings it was sort of like, “This is an amazing writing sample. We think it’s probably an unproduceable film, but we would love for you to maybe write something else for us.”

**Craig:** Mm-hmm.

**Richard:** “And if you really want to direct it, we respect that, but you’re barely 24 years old. You look like you’re 17 and good luck with that.”

**Craig:** Right.

**Richard:** “But we just, you know, come write something else for us. ”

**John:** Let me pause your story for one second, because this is a very common thread of what I’ve heard about sort of first stories, and sort of my first story, too. Everyone always thinks like some incredibly powerful person reads it. It’s slipped over the door and someone reads this thing and says, “Ah-ha! This is the thing.” But it was really your friend who you knew from before who was working a job at sort of your same level, was working at a desk somewhere who read it and sort of said, this is really good.

And he profited by — not profited literally — but by recognizing your talent he could take it to somebody and say like, “I think this is really good. Please pay attention to this.” So, it was somebody at your same level. It wasn’t just some giant person who read it and said, “Yes, this is the real thing.” It was a ramp up. You didn’t hit 100 miles per hour right at the first day.

**Richard:** Yes, and it was a strategic ramping, because Sean was a very well liked producer at New Line at the time and he had a very smart boss. And he was, you know, obviously talking to the right assistants and kind of networking with the right assistants. And to this day you even see what Frank Leonard has done with the Black List. It’s all just sort of galvanizing from the desks of the mailroom and even places like that where people find the great material and sort of pass it upwards in exchange for being a part of this sort of trade system of information, and credit, and representation.

It’s a system that still exists in a different way today.

**John:** Now, these six months that you were taking meetings with places, you were taking these sort of general meetings. They liked your script and they want you to write something else. Were you working at this point or were you still like making coffee at production houses?

**Richard:** I was sort of still serving coffee and then I was hired by Phoenix Pictures to adapt the children’s novel Holes, which was my first big writing job. Which I completely, [laughs], jumped the shark, so to speak. I went and just changed so much of the novel into kind of like a dystopian, post-apocalyptic Stephen King thing.

**Craig:** Mm-hmm.

**Richard:** And just kept the core essentials of the novel.

**Craig:** That’s what I would have done. I would have done the same thing.

**Richard:** I was just convinced that this is what would be the great version of the movie and that they would see what I wanted to do —

**Craig:** So great.

**Richard:** They probably read it and I got that call like, “Are you insane?” What are you thinking? This is not what we wanted.”

**Craig:** Yeah, but you read Donnie Darko and then you hired me to write Holes. Are you insane?

**Richard:** Well, but I was very naïve. And I was convinced that I could convince them that this was the cooler version of the movie. And they were just like, “No, we want to make a PG-rated pretty faithful adaptation of this best-selling book. We have Andrew Davis directing. You’re insane. Please sign this contract. We’re not going to pay you anymore money. We respect you. We like you. But we’re moving on in a different direction.”

**Craig:** Right.

**Richard:** And I was heartbroken. But then I got the call, you know, we were kind of under the impression that Donnie Darko as a script was just sort of this great writing sample and it was sort of dead as a potential movie due to my stubborn refusal to let anyone else direct it.

**John:** Now, at this point had you — you said you were going to be directing this, but had you come up with the budget? Had you come up with the schedule? Had you come up with a production plan for how you could do it?

**Richard:** We had actually taken a meeting with Paramount Classics at the time. And they were making movies very, very inexpensively, like the under $2 million kind of budget range. And we had talked about trying to do it for like $1.5 million to $2 million, but given the ambition of the story, you know, we have time portals and big set pieces, and school assemblies, and a jet engine smashing through a house. It was very ambitious. People were saying we needed $10 million. And we honestly — with the different kind of producers and line producers we had talked to throughout the process. And Sean McKittrick was sort of coming in with a number about $4.5 million that we thought was the bare bones to really achieve the vision.

That to do it for less than that would really be so much of a compromise. You know, sometimes there’s that threshold where you realize it’s better to just hold off and put the movie back on — put the script back on the shelf as opposed to making it at a budget where you are going to compromise what’s really essentially to the story.

**Craig:** Right.

**Richard:** And we didn’t want to monkey with it in that way. And then all of a sudden the script had been sort of digested by the entire town that people were still talking about it, like, “What’s going on with that? Will he sell it? Will he finally just let someone else take it over?” And there was a lot of discussion — “Why do you need it to be set in 1988? Just set it in present day and make it more of a horror film.” And all these kind of things, you know. “Get rid of the Asian girl. You don’t need her.”

And all these kinds of things that are sort of these voices sort of beating me down a little bit. But then we got word that Jason Schwartzman had read the script and really loved it and was interested in meeting.

And I went and met with him and he attached himself to play Donnie. And all of a sudden the script had all this new legitimacy and that I was legitimized by Jason’s attachment.

**John:** So, with one actor who at that point was A-list-ish —

**Richard:** He was coming off of Rushmore.

**Craig:** He was kind of hot. He was hot.

**John:** He was hot at the moment, so therefore there was an extra element that made it seem producible.

**Craig:** Right, like Jason Schwartzman now makes you the new Wes Anderson.

**Richard:** Well, it was this wonderful thing. And then we got word from my agent that Nancy Juvonen had read the script. Nancy who is Drew Barrymore’s producing partner at Flower Films. And she wanted to meet with me. So, I was like, wow, this is great. And Sean and I went to the set of Charlie’s Angels at LA Center Studios in Downtown LA.

**Craig:** Back to John August.

**John:** Where we were shooting it.

**Richard:** And I might have actually, maybe I met you.

**John:** We may have crossed paths there with trailers and all that stuff.

**Richard:** I walked up to Drew’s trailer and lo and behold there was Cameron Diaz right outside of Drew’s trailer. And they were goofing around. I was briefly introduced to her and obviously our paths would converge later in life. But went into Drew’s trailer and Nancy was there and we had this wonderful discussion. And Drew was still finishing the script and paging through it. And I was like, listen, we would love for you to play the English teacher, Mrs. Pomeroy.

And she’s like, “I would love for my company to produce this with you and we could partner on this project.” And I said absolutely. It was really a very quick marriage, so to speak. And then with Drew Barrymore and Jason Schwartzman, we got an offer from a company called Pandora, a European finance company at the American Film Market. I think in November of 1999 they made an offer for $4.5 million. And Drew was the kind of galvanizing foreign sales actor to get us to that number.

**John:** Absolutely. Drew was a very marketable star at that point.

**Richard:** Yes.

**John:** People wanted to make a movie, so a small movie with Drew Barrymore at AFM — pretty easy sell.

**Richard:** Yeah. Yeah.

**John:** So, with this package sort of put together, so Jason Schwartzman, Drew Barrymore, you to direct, how long did it then take to actually start rolling cameras?

**Richard:** Well, we were able to kind of get the financing closed, I think, going into the beginning of 2000. And all of a sudden Jason had a scheduling conflict with another movie and was going to have to back out at the last minute. And we were gearing towards a summer production start because Drew had a window, a one-week window, right before she was going to do a Penny Marshall film called Riding in Cars with Boys.

So, we had that one-week with Drew to get our act together or we were going to lose her, or we weren’t going to get the movie made. And when Jason had to back out it was this horrifying weekend where, oh no, is Drew going to back out as well? And is this all going to collapse? Is this going to undermine my credibility or something? And it was — Jason was very apologetic and it was just an unfortunate circumstance.

And Drew left this wonderful message on my answering machine. This is back in the day — in the year 2000 when we still had answering machines. And she left me this long wonderful message saying, “We’re going to figure this out. We’re going to find another great actor. I’m in this for you, and the script, and I believe in you.” And she was really wonderful.

And so we started meeting with some different actors to play Donnie, and I went to Drew’s office and met with this kid named Jake Gyllenhaal, who was 19 years old, and had done October Sky, and was kind of at Columbia, segueing out of Columbia after two years, and was going to get back into acting. And I basically gave him the part on the spot.

**John:** Great. Jake Gyllenhaal very much feels like the movie star version of you. I mean, did you notice that when you cast him?

**Richard:** I never thought of it that way, but then as we were shooting the film on our breakneck 28-day schedule, Jake confided in me about halfway through, he was like, “You know I’m kind of mimicking you. You know that, right?” And I was like, oh, okay, I don’t know how I feel about that, but I guess it’s working.

**Craig:** What part of him was mimicking you? Because he has different moves in the movie.

**Richard:** I don’t know. I think — I may be too detached from myself or too much time has passed, but I don’t know. I think there’s a lot of —

**Craig:** I think I know.

**John:** I know exactly what it is, too. Craig, you can say it first, and then I’ll say what I think it is.

**Craig:** All right. So, you know when I say something to you, Richard Kelly, I’ll say, “Ah, Richard Kelly, look how handsome you are.” And then you kind of look down and you’re like, huh, and you get that little goofy look. It’s the same look that Jake does every time he slips into his fugue state and starts talking to Frank. That funky little grin and that semi-sinister look in his eyes — I’m telling you, that’s it man, right there.

**John:** I was going to say the same thing about the eye contact thing, because it’s a thing I also noticed from all the photos in Austin is that you never quite look in the lens of the camera. And so you’re always like a little bit off to the edge of it, which I feel very much is a Donnie Darko thing. So, I can see that being a… — It’s fine, it works.

**Richard:** Yeah, it’s not intentional. It’s just maybe —

**John:** I also think the relationship between a director and the actor, especially a writer-director and an actor, can be that kind of thing. Like Ryan Reynolds basically plays me in the middle section of The Nines. And it was fine. He owned up to it and I said this is fine. And the cast and crew recognized he was doing it. It was appropriate for that.

**Richard:** Yeah, I mean, it all kind of goes back to you say that your high school education or even prior to your high school education sometimes it really informs a greater part of your life, for better or for worse, and it was like my seventh grade English teacher, Mr. Jordan, who taught us Watership Down, the book that Drew Barrymore teaches in the film. And his whole mantra was “write what you know.”

It sounds very simple, and it sounds like a cliché, but it’s really the personal stuff that ends up bleeding through when you’re writing. When you work with an actor they can kind of detect the truth from the author and they can sort of — it bleeds through into the performance somehow in everything.

**Craig:** Right.

**Richard:** So, sometimes it’s a virtue of the actor’s detective work.

**Craig:** Well, it’s interesting also that when you talk about writing what you know, you’re very smartly talking about writing what you know emotionally. You don’t know what it’s like to have an airplane engine drop on you while you’re sleeping, or to go through a time portal, or to talk to a rabbit that is, in fact, the time image of a boy you kill. It’s — spoiler, sorry. It’s our emotional lives that when we talk about writing what we know, that’s what we’re talking about.

I think a lot of people misunderstand the advice and they write very boring scripts about their actual day. I just hope people don’t do that. [laughs] Don’t do that.

**John:** Absolutely. It’s most crucial that you’re able to write in a way that’s emotionally true to how you would feel in that circumstance. And so you feel that it’s… — You’re writing yourself in these characters so that they’re responding in ways that you would respond to these situations — these absurd situations — that you sort of are creating for these characters.

Now, so fast forward through production. It was 28 days, I think?

**Richard:** It was 28 days in the late summer of 2000. Shot in and around the greater Los Angeles area, Long Beach, Burbank, out in the Calabasas Ranch area and then the San Angelo, across the mountains. It was just sort of approximating a Virginia idyllic suburban town in the greater Los Angeles area by virtue of composite.

**John:** Great. And why did you choose Los Angeles? It was for ease of actors mostly?

**Richard:** It was a combination of ease of actors. And there was a commercial strike happening, I believe, in the summer of 2000 which made a lot of crew available to work at low rates. And during the summer when everyone’s kids are out of school, a lot of people in the below the line world, they want to stay in town. They want to shoot in Los Angeles.

And if they’re taking a pay cut to be with their kids, as opposed to going to Vancouver or Toronto where a lot of the runaway production was happening, we were able to get a big crew for cheap. And it made sense to do it in LA as opposed to going off to Toronto which a lot of people were doing at the time.

**Craig:** I have a question about that’s I guess about how at the origin of this, at the beginning of Donnie Darko, you’re writing a movie, and when we write a movie normally the movie is designed to be the sum total of what we’re presenting to the audience artistically. What’s interesting about Donnie Darko, among other things, is that it was ahead of its time not only when it came out. I think it’s actually currently still ahead of its time in this aspect. That the movie isn’t the total picture.

You wrote a book that appears in a movie that is almost required, really, to complete the experience of the movie. Was that something that you did intentionally, or did you write the movie and then say, “You know, there’s this other part of this. There’s a website and a book and an additional amount of experience that’s required to augment the experience of watching the movie.”

**Richard:** There’s this expression called “scope creep” which is my dad is a scientist and worked at NASA for many years. It’s when the scope of a project continues to creep outward. And you don’t realize it’s happening. That’s my issue with all of my projects. They’re always becoming bigger and longer than can be contained within the sort of two-hour format.

And the book that is written by Roberta Sparrow, Grandma Death, in the story is called The Philosophy of Time Travel. And Donnie as a character is reading it and obsessing over it. And as a writer, and as the sort of avatar for Donnie, or vice versa, I was wanting to know what was in that book. And I was obsessed with completing it. And I had kind of rough draft sketches of it coming into my head as I was directing the film. And then as we were editing the film I went and wrote out all the specific chapter titles and some of the essential pages from The Philosophy of Time Travel.

And as we were trying to edit the film down it was clear that that kind of stuff wasn’t going to ever make it into a film, a version of the film that would run lower than two hours. So, it was something that I said, “Let’s put it on the website. Let’s have it be a tangential piece of information.”

I’ve kind of really gravitated towards that kind of thing in all of my films because it’s an overflow of information, but it’s also I guess they call it transmedia is what the word for it is now. And so it became sort of a transmedia thing with this elaborate website that we built with this company in London. And it did become more kind of essential information and I kind of worked it into the director’s cut of the film years later.

But, again, it’s scope creep.

**Craig:** But it’s interesting to me because in order — I didn’t quite understand, and this is going to lead into another question, I didn’t quite understand if there was a certainty to the movie until I read that additional material and then I thought to myself, okay, there is a certainty to this. There is an answer to this movie in a sense. Not complete. No movie gives you a complete answer, but there is at least a guided solution to what you’re seeing and what was intended here.

But you seem to be saying that you didn’t even quite have that solution yourself until you were in post-production, which is fascinating to me, because it’s almost like you built a very interesting puzzle box, but you didn’t quite know how to solve it yourself until the very end.

**Richard:** Well, I think the solving process or the completion process really does go through the editing. The writing process continues through editing. And even when you do reshoots. We did do one additional reshoot. It’s not a reshoot, because that implies that you —

**Craig:** Screwed up a scene.

**Richard:** You screwed up and you redid it. It was an additional — it was one additional day of photography we did after the Sundance premiere of the film which was James Duval waking up at the end as part of all the characters waking up from the tangent universe and from the dream experience that they had. Whether it was a communal dream or an actual alternate universe is left up to the gods to explain, because no one can ever answer that question.

But, the studio that bought the film six months after its sort of disastrous Sundance premiere was like, “We really wish there was a shot of Frank alive waking up at the end so the audience understands that he’s still alive and he was part of that experience.” And I’m like, oh wow, I wish I could have shot that.

So, we actually went to a little stage in Burbank and set up a little set and got the cameras and we shot James Duval waking up with those drawings on the easel…

**Craig:** Right. And touching his eye…

**Richard:** Touching his eye.

**Craig:** Which was a great little moment.

Well, let me ask you this question. What happened at Sundance? [laughs] What happened there? How did it make you feel? And how do you feel about it now?

**Richard:** You know, everything happens for a reason. And that was the journey that this film was meant to take. But, it was a situation where at Sundance 2001 we had this huge amount of hype going into the festival. A $4.5 million budget was relatively large for a Sundance film at that time, even for now it’s a very healthy budget. And the film looked like it cost a lot more than that.

And we had big movie stars. And it had time portals. And it had all of these sort of components where you read the summary in the Sundance program and you’re like, “What in the hell is this?” There was just this big curiosity factor. And we were also the first film officially in Sundance competition history to have digital effects.

**Craig:** Ah, interesting.

**Richard:** And so immediately that was a little bit of a, you know —

**Craig:** Oh, so you guys were like sellouts all of a sudden.

**John:** Yeah.

**Richard:** [laughs] It was a very huge showing at the first Eccles screening and everyone was there. All of the buyers. Everyone, you know. Harvey Weinstein was there wearing a Donnie Darko hat.

**Craig:** Oh, god! Harvey! What the hell?

**Richard:** Well, you know, it was overwhelming. And when the credits rolled at the end it was just — there were applause from plenty of people who loved it, but a whole lot more people who were just freaked out, and disturbed, and —

**Craig:** Who were just, WTF? [laughs]

**Richard:** Yeah. It was just like, did that guy just kill himself? Did your hero just commit suicide?

**Craig:** Right.

**Richard:** And then it ends, you know. “Whoa! I don’t know how comfortable I am with this.” It was a shell-shocked reaction and it was not a movie that made people feel good as they left at the Eccles Theater. So, immediately all the buyers sort of backed away very quickly. And it was kind of like we had the Ebola Virus. At that time movies would sell very quickly or they wouldn’t.

**Craig:** Right.

**Richard:** Now, just everyone knows that sometimes it takes a month, two months to sell, and it’s okay because the market has changed. But that was the time where everyone pounced or they dropkicked the movie out into the mountains. So, we got dropkicked.

**Craig:** You got dropkicked into the mountains. I mean, obviously the story ends well. There is an interesting, I don’t know if there is a lesson to be taken from experiences like that, because I think every experience is different. But I wonder do you walk around with a little bit more confidence knowing that the last time people kicked you into the mountain they were wrong. Is that a good thing or a bad thing? I can’t tell.

**Richard:** Well, you know, listen. I take everything with a grain of salt. And I look at any struggle or mountain that had to be overcome as just a part of the process and kind of a learning experience. And I just try to take all the knowledge and absorb it and continue to just understand that everything is a process and to be really strategic and to try to just hone my filmmaking in a manner that things get easier.

I remember I asked Tony Scott when we were working on Domino, I was like, “Tony, does it get easier with each film?”

And he was like, “Oh, no. Rich, it gets harder.”

**Craig:** Yeah.

**Richard:** And it was sad to hear that, but he said it with a grin. He said it with a grin of a man who absolutely loves to make films, more than life itself. But he was kind of just conceding that it can get more difficult. And, I don’t know —

**Craig:** And it did get more difficult for you in a sense.

**Richard:** Well, I mean, listen, there are always new challenges, but I think a lot of it is you sometimes can design your own difficulty without realizing it. Or, you can manifest it. And I think it’s learning how not to do that and it’s learning how to just sort of figure out how to make concessions or collaborations or judgment calls that will just help make the process easier, but still get what you want.

**John:** I look at your career and I look at Rian Johnson’s career, because you are both writer-directors who try to make their own films and try to do their own things. And each one is really challenging, and difficult, and has very specific worlds built around sort of how it all sort of fits together.

One of the things Rian has done though is he’s gone off and directed TV, which is the chance to practice that craft of directing independently of having to have the onus of a movie. Has that been interesting to you? Have you considered doing television? To do your own show or someone else’s show?

**Richard:** I’ve kind of, you know, I’ve kind of flirted a little bit with the idea of television here and there. And it’s something that I absolutely want to do at some point. But I’ve been so consumed, particularly in the past three years with writing feature screenplays. I’ve just been on a writing binge for about three years now.

**Craig:** For yourself or…?

**Richard:** For myself. For myself. For purely selfish purposes. [laughs] But in a way that I’ve just been trying to actually refine my craft and write a lot of different scripts in various different genres, places where people wouldn’t think I’d be able to, I’ve gone there. People want to, again, always put you in a box or a category, so I’ve spent the past three years writing a whole bunch of different kinds of films that no one would expect from me.

And I think with television it’s more of like you can create your own show, or you can come in and direct a pilot, or you can come in and direct an episode the way Rian did brilliantly with Breaking Bad, which is we all know now one of the great shows in the history of the medium. And I think Rian is smart, and savvy, and talented enough to have kind of figured that out early on and was able to go in and really do some wonderful work.

And I admire him for doing it. And I’m envious of him for getting to work in that series because it’s so amazing. So, as for me in television, I think I just want to get one more feature under my belt and then kind of see how the timing works out and whether — you know, how I can kind of really make a mark in television in a meaningful way where I don’t feel like I’m just sort of directing traffic or just getting a paycheck.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**Richard:** I want to do it for the right reasons. And I want to really be — I’m one of those people, I don’t know how to fake something. I’m really idealistic and probably to a fault in a lot of ways where I just want to make sure I have authorship of it.

But, again, sometimes you don’t have to have complete authorship of something for it to be fulfilling. You can really come in and be a partner, or be a —

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** Let’s talk about the places you could work right now. Because it seems like all, my recollection, all three of your films have been for different places and for sort of newer places. So, this first place was Pandora who put up the money for Donnie Darko. Who did Southland Tales?

**Richard:** Southland Tales was a combination of about eight different equity sources. Universal International was the foreign investor, along with Wild Bunch who had France. And I’ve worked with them also on The Box, my next film. And then Sony bought the film for domestic rights. And then Samuel Goldwyn distributed in a partnership with Sony. So, it was a —

**John:** Yeah. They have sort of this weird relationship between them.

**Richard:** Yeah. It was like a Trivial Pursuit pie piece of eight different — so, I think there were lots of people involved with Southland Tales because it was such a complex, elaborate film. A $17.5 million budget film. So, that was a big Frankenstein conglomeration of people. And then The Box was a company called Media Rights Capital.

**John:** Which is also equity.

**Richard:** Which is also equity.

**Craig:** Right. They’re associated with William Morris Endeavor.

**Richard:** Yes. And they partnered with Radar Pictures, owned and operated by Ted Field. And those two entities partnered with Warner Bros. Pictures who took domestic on the film. So, it was essentially an equity-funded film with domestic distribution in place before we started shooting.

So, it was kind of a studio film in a lot of ways, but most studio films today have equity from an outside source. It’s more of a distribution P&A deal. But then they’re giving notes on the script and they’re approving the wardrobe and the hair for the actors. And micromanaging as they’re prone to do. But that’s the reality of the business and you’ve got to do it.

**Craig:** Well, don’t you think that there is a certain, if you’re investing money in a Richard Kelly movie, at some point I assume they all look at each other and say, “Well, we could attempt to do the thing we normally do, but it’s not going to work because Richard Kelly.”

**Richard:** Well, you know, the one thing that I’m proud of with all my movies is I put the money on the screen. There is always a production value that surpasses the budget in terms of what people think it costs and what it really costs. So, I always put the money on the screen. But I also end up shooting tons of scenes that don’t make it into the movie. And I always end up with like 45 minutes of deleted scenes.

And it becomes really difficult to cut the movie down to under two hours. And that’s one of the things that I’ve learned, particularly in the writing process, and I’m going through it right now on a project where I’m just like I’m not going to have any deleted scenes. I’m literally going to have —

**Craig:** Well, good for you. That’s a very good goal to have.

**Richard:** Yeah. I’m going to have nothing in the script that isn’t absolutely necessary and it’s scope creep.

**John:** It is scope creep.

**Craig:** It is scope creep.

**John:** We’ve talked about Gravity a lot on the podcast recently. Craig, did you finally see Gravity?

**Craig:** Uh, what?

**John:** [laughs] Craig still has not seen Gravity.

**Craig:** I saw Walter Mitty.

**John:** Well, very good. I’m proud of you.

**Craig:** Can we talk about that? [laughs] I saw that.

**John:** You cannot talk about that. We can talk about Gravity for one second because Walter Mitty, I suspect, probably has some scope creep, but Gravity has no scope creep. That is a very lean movie. And it’s one of the things I think is actually interesting about making movies for the big screen versus making a TV series. Because I look at these situations where you have — you’ve built this entire world, this entire universe. You clearly could have built a whole series of Donnie Darko and sort of what that universe is.

And Donnie Darko might also have been fantastic as a series, or as a limited series, or that kind of thing. Or the way American Horror Story is, those limited series where it makes that run through.

**Craig:** Definitely true for Southland Tales, for sure.

**John:** Oh my god, Southland Tales feel like it’s —

**Craig:** It feels like it’s a series that got sort of compressed down.

**Richard:** Yeah. Yeah. I mean, ultimately I still want to do an animated prequel to Southland Tales and a final kind of cut of it that would be the size of like a limited run miniseries, you know. But, you’re right, because I was doing transmedia with graphic novel prequels and my mind was overflowing in the scope creep sense of feature film evolving into transmedia. And again, we’re now in this sort of new world of the internet, Netflix limited run series that sort of are bridging between film and television in a lot of ways.

**John:** But to me it just sounds like J.J. Abrams in terms of ambition but you don’t have Bad Robot behind you. You don’t have 100 really talented elves to do all the other stuff that could do that thing. And so in order to up your sort of productivity if you want to do those kind of things, maybe you need more elves?

**Richard:** Yeah, yeah, I think everyone could use more elves. I think if anything I’ve been the elf storing away all the Christmas gifts for the past three years and just really getting a lot of material ready so that my hope is that starting next year that I’m kind of back behind the camera and I’ll have a pipeline where I can be working consistently at different budget levels, whether it’s a feature film that costs well under $10 million, or a feature film that costs well over $10 million and in different degrees. That hopefully there’s a way to just continue working with a consistency because, you know, it is a situation where I feel like I’m a director first and foremost and a writer in the secondary position.

But I’ve been doing so much writing over the past three years that I finally feel like, okay, I’m starting to finally feel like a real screenwriter. And now I’m kind of really ready to go enter the second act of my directing career I guess. And I’m always just trying to get better and not be complacent.

**Craig:** You have an interesting challenge because on the one hand I think it’s great that you’ve made the reduction of scope creep a goal. And I love that you’re saying my goal is to not direct a deleted scene. That should be every director’s goal. I completely agree.

On the other hand, what makes you unique and what is part of what is attractive about your work to your fans is the scope creep. It’s a funny thing. How do you become a better Richard Kelly but still be Richard Kelly?

**Richard:** Well, I think it is, you know —

**Craig:** Did I just freak you out? I just freaked you out, didn’t I?

**Richard:** A little bit. [laughs] Because I’m going through that right now. I honestly am. But I believe that there’s a way to get it all within a framework of the two-hour timeline and still have the complexity and the density — sometimes people are afraid of the word density because it can read as something that’s cumbersome or medicinal or hard to get through or impenetrable, which are adjectives often used to describe my work.

**John:** [laughs]

**Craig:** [laughs]

**Richard:** [laughs] But when I say density I like to think of films where you can watch them over, and over, and over again and see new ideas, and see new themes, and laugh at different nuances. And I’m just trying to make sure to hold onto that, but to make sure that it’s — I’m not just going to have a 2 hour 45 minute cut of the film, you know.

**John:** It’s interesting what you say about density because a thing I’ve noticed in some films is that you recognize that characters have relationships before that scene started, which is great. But sometimes they’re referencing things that are not germane to the scene and therefore it’s pulling you out of the scene that you’re currently in. And it’s a thing I try to always be mindful of is the audience only has the information about what they’re seeing in front of them.

So, you want them to believe these characters have relationships and they existed before they walked on screen. You can’t have them be so fascinated or distracted by what those things could be that they’re not paying attention to what’s happening there right in front of them.

You start to lose the audience’s confidence in your ability to tell a story. And it’s such a tough balance. And I think TV gets away with it more because you just have more time and more hours. And you can have that extra scene to establish how Tyrion got into that situation.

**Richard:** I was going to say the wonderful thing about a lot of TV is you look at a brilliant episode of Mad Men, or Breaking Bad, or some of our greatest shows and you think some of the best scenes might have ended up being deleted scenes in movies, you know.

**John:** Totally.

**Craig:** No question.

**Richard:** Because there’s the time to breathe and to see the character doing something that might seem incidental or not really necessary to the main through line of the story but it’s very fascinating stuff.

**Craig:** Yeah, David Benioff and Dan Weiss ran into a big problem on their first season of Game of Thrones because they had never done television before and they were short. They just didn’t have enough episode. A lot of the episodes were running short. And HBO basically said you kind of need to give us at least 50 some minutes here. You can’t give us a 42-minute episode.

So, they went back and just added scenes. They were pre-deleted scenes. [laughs] They weren’t even scenes that they felt were necessary to begin with. Now they’re adding them in to just fill time. And some of them are the best scenes in the series. They actually learned a great lesson from that. In television sometimes these quite moments where these characters — you can afford them in television. And we can’t necessarily in film.

And so I think it’s a great thing that you’re addressing it. And I guess for folks who are listening there is a great lesson for all of us that you go and you make a movie like Donnie Darko and it’s a cultural touchstone and the thought of changing even a frame of it would make many, many people of that generation shriek, of a certain generation shriek.

But the person who created it continues this kind of endless self-evaluation and this self-recreation, which I think is amazing.

**John:** Agreed.

**Craig:** Did I freak you out again, Richard? Are you all right?

**Richard:** I’m constantly freaked out, you know, by life. So, you know.

**John:** Craig, you didn’t learn that at Austin Film Festival? He’s always a little bit nervous. And it’s often because you’re telling Leigh Whannell to like figure out ways to kill Richard.

**Craig:** Well.

**John:** That was a long [crosstalk].

**Craig:** Killing Richard Kelly is, for whatever reason, it’s just more entertaining to consider than killing, I don’t know, other people.

**Richard:** [laughs]

**Craig:** It’s more of a challenge. I feel like he would fight back really hard.

**Richard:** I hope none of the listeners of this podcast decide to follow through.

**Craig:** Yeah, don’t kill Richard Kelly. By the way, don’t kill him if for no other reason than he’s mine to kill.

**John:** Ha!

**Craig:** My quarry.

**John:** Now, Richard, a thing we do on our shows every week is a One Cool Thing and I should have warned you about this ahead of time. So, you can think about it while we do things. You actually mentioned one of them at the Black List party. You sent me an email about it which could potentially be a great One Cool Thing. Do you remember what that was?

**Richard:** Oh god, what was the email?

**John:** That science foundation thing?

**Richard:** Oh, yes, yes.

**John:** So, when we get around maybe that can be your One Cool Thing. Craig, do you want to start? Should I start?

**Craig:** Well, you have a big one. I think you should go last. Mine is really easy. Someone tweeted this to me and I jumped on it and then people continued to tweet it to me as if I didn’t know, which is kind of exciting. It means that I’m a certain kind of person that likes a certain kind of thing and everyone is figuring it out.

It’s this thing called Coin and it doesn’t exist yet. This company is a startup company and they’re taking preorders, but it’s just one of those things like the Nest where I went, oh cool — if that works it would be great. So, we all have a bunch of credit cards and debit cards in our wallet, and I don’t like having lots of things in my wallet. I’m constantly going through and getting rid of stuff.

So, they came up with this thing called Coin. It’s the size of a credit card but it is electronic. It syncs up with your phone over Bluetooth, secure Bluetooth, and you essentially scan your cards into your phone with one of those little scanny things that they send you. And then take a picture of your credit cards. And then it pipes all that information and syncs it into the one coin card. And then there’s like a little touch thing on the back of it that lets you select which card you want to use at any given point. And it has all of your cards on one card.

I don’t even have that many cards and I got so excited about this. So, anyway. That’s my One Cool Thing. Doesn’t yet exist. As you point out, most of my One Cool Things are things I haven’t actually experienced, but I want to.

**John:** We will put a link to that in the show notes along with the video that Adam Lisagor did showing it. It’s a very clever idea. Essentially, it looks like a credit card but it can change out its stripe. You just push a little button and it changes what the stripe is. And so when you run it through whatever little machine it will show up as a different card.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** And that’s a very clever idea.

**Richard:** Interesting, yes.

**Craig:** Yes, Richard Kelly. Now, what is your One Cool Thing?

**Richard:** My One Cool Thing is something called the Science and Entertainment Exchange.

**Craig:** Excellent.

**Richard:** The Science and Entertainment Exchange is a organization that puts on a monthly symposium for screenwriters and producers and anyone who is interested in really, really cutting edge scientific discourse. And a symposium of probably an audience of about 100 people that are in attendance with a very elaborate audio visual presentation. And at least three to four very high level scientific guests there to discuss an issue and as it might relate to your storytelling.

**John:** So, what are some recent examples?

**Richard:** Some recent examples, there was one held at the DGA Theater on bioethics. And it was this wonderful discussion of bioethics with four prominent scientists and John Spaihts who is a screenwriter who wrote Prometheus and the upcoming Passengers was the moderator of the event. And it was just a discussion of different bioethical issues facing our world, whether it’s organ donation or stem cell research or something to do with — there’s a huge flu outbreak and there’s only ten respirators left in the hospital. And when it comes down the last respirator there’s a 14-year-old girl and a 63-year-old man.

**Craig:** Girl!

**Richard:** You have to give it to one of them.

**Craig:** Girl. Give it to the girl!

**Richard:** What is more ethical? And then they have everyone text message their answer up to the big screen, like who should get the respirator. And then they put another wrinkle into it. They say, “Well, the little girl has this terminal disease and the man has created, the 65-year-old man has created some of the most seminal works of fiction in the world and has a Nobel Prize for literature.”

**Craig:** Nah, give it to the girl.

**John:** His best days are behind him.

**Craig:** She’s the girl, I mean, give it to the girl.

**Richard:** They keep adjusting the ethical dilemma and everyone re-text messages their answer. And you see how the data is changing and where people are in terms of their perception. You know, that’s only the beginning, but it’s just this really fascinating discussion. And then a month later there was an FBI agent there to host a symposium on psychopaths and the science of psychopathy. And she was like a modern day Clarice Starling. She’s like the real deal. And she was giving you all the — this audio/visual presentation about serial killers and their profile and their disposition and their behavioral habits and the way that they blend into the world.

And it’s this really disturbing and fascinating discussion of psychopaths. It’s just really great use of science and how to implement science into your work with these amazing people that you probably wouldn’t get to meet in this kind of environment in everyday life.

**Craig:** That is cool. I would have enjoyed being at a seminar on psychopaths and watch — I would like to watch you, Richard Kelly, watching the lady talk about psychopaths.

**John:** Well, Craig, you would find it very helpful because like, oh man, they’re onto me for these reasons so therefore I’m going to have to change up my game completely.

**Craig:** No, psychopaths never worry about being caught because they’re — not that I would know, but Richard Kelly —

**John:** Oh, that’s right.

**Craig:** Richard Kelly and I can have a side discussion about what it means to be a total sociopath.

**Richard:** They have a lack of empathy.

**Craig:** Yes. A total lack.

**Richard:** That’s the big thing. It’s very disturbing.

**John:** Yes, it can be quite disturbing. So, my One Cool Thing is actually an app. It’s an app called Hotel Tonight which is an iPhone app and it’s incredibly useful if you find yourself in a city without a hotel room. So, essentially at noon every day across the nation — noon locally every day across the nation, it goes online and you can find cheaper hotel rooms for whatever city you’re in.

And so last weekend I found myself in New York City and I needed a room. And so I went to it. It was actually very smart, and good, and easy to use. It’s much faster than going through Expedia and everything else.

**Craig:** What’s it called again?

**John:** Hotel Tonight.

**Craig:** Hotel Tonight. I usually use Grindr when I need a room in New York.

**Richard:** [laughs]

**John:** That’s another effective way to find it. But then you have to share a bed, or a couch, or something.

**Craig:** Eh.

**John:** And you never know.

**Craig:** It’s cheap.

**John:** There could be needles or other drugs involved.

**Craig:** There usually are.

**John:** A little party and play for you.

So, Hotel Tonight was the app. And so the reason why I found myself in New York is sort of the bigger story. Last week on Thursday I got the call from the producers saying, “We thought we could go through the spring with Big Fish, and we’re only going to be able to go to December 29. And so we need to tell the cast because we want to tell the cast before the cast finds out from somebody else.”

And so I had to sort of fly secretly to New York so to not warn anybody that this was happening. So, I had to get there, get in early at night, use the Hotel Tonight to get the room.

And so I showed up at the Neil Simon Theater and it was actually really happy to see everybody there because it was our Sunday matinee, so it’s 3pm. So, I show up there a little bit early. I deliberately wore all black so I could sit back with the orchestra. And so I got to see the whole show with the orchestra. And I got to sort of hug everybody and be happy and be so excited to sort of join the whole cast.

And just be the cheerful like “I’m just here to support you guys” kind of look because I didn’t want anyone to be tipped off before going out on stage that there was bad news coming.

So, what happens, this is, you know, I didn’t want to miss this because it was the end of this part of the journey, but it was also… — I don’t know. I think as a writer you — at a certain point you start to accumulate experiences. And I didn’t want to not know what this felt like and just to sort of not know what it felt like for this thing to have an end date to it.

So, at the end of the matinee, current comes down, we keep everybody on stage and the producers break the news. And it was surprise, and heartbreak, and shock because we’ve been selling out all the shows and there was a standing ovation every night. So, it was from their perspective like well how could this possibly happen.

And you don’t go into full explanations there. I won’t go into full explanations on the podcast. But essentially we knew how much money we were making week by week in November. And that was enough for us to be turning a small profit. But, in February, the numbers will naturally go down because —

**Craig:** It’s a dead zone.

**John:** Broadway is very — it’s a dead zone. Broadway is very seasonal. So, we knew that we’d be about 30% lower than that in February. And at 30% lower than that we wouldn’t be profitable. We wouldn’t be able to keep the show running in February.

And so because of that, the theater does the same math and they say, “You’re not going to be able to hold onto the theater come February. We want you out sooner.” So, it becomes this whole negotiation about when do you leave the theater, how it’s all going to happen.

This was a chance to make our money through the holidays, make as much for everybody as we can make it, and sort of know when we’re ending.

So, my function with seeing everybody on stage was to sort of say, “You’re awesome. We’re incredibly thankful to have this group with us to make the first version of Big Fish.” There will be more versions of Big Fish. And coming out of this process we will be able to license the show and we’ll have future productions of it because we had this first Broadway production.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** Also, I could remind people that this wasn’t the end. It was the middle. And it’s that weird thing where we still have seven weeks left. And so people can still come see the show. And we will probably sell a lot more tickets because the end is —

**Craig:** Right. There’s a limited supply now of shows.

**John:** But the whole experience of this part of it reminds me of as we talked about the show on the podcast, it’s a little bit like film in that you’re always working on one thing. There’s one project you’re working on. And every night you’re working on making this one thing, unlike TV where you’re doing different episodes.

But it’s like TV in the sense that it’s just a continual process. And your ticket sales are sort of like ratings in a way. And so if your ratings fall below a certain level the network, or in this case the theater, kind of cancels you.

But it’s also like a business. It’s like that little startup. And this process of closing down is much more like a startup, like a tech startup that sort of run out of money and that you have to, you know, you’re relying on your weekly cash flow in order to pay for your marketing or pay for all of these things. And at a certain place the numbers just won’t work out. And they won’t work out for every show. Like every show will close. The Book of Mormon will probably close at some point in 30 years…

**Craig:** [laughs]

**John:** Because the numbers won’t work out. And so everything has an end. It also reminded me of sort of this sense of expectation in that one of the things that I think is so smart about what we’re doing in TV right now are those limited series where you know there’s ten episodes. And if there’s another block of ten episodes, great. But it’s designed to be ten episodes long.

And if we had come into Big Fish saying like, “We’re going to run for 12 weeks through December 29,” that would have been awesome. But it’s that sense of the sort of moving goal lines, like you never know when you’re really going to end, that you sort of — you can always kind of pull failure out of success.

**Craig:** Well, you know —

**John:** Things in my head.

**Craig:** I have to say, I mean, obviously I was upset when I heard the news. And upset for both the people in the show, and poor Ryan the Giant. He seemed to take it very hard. And everybody that was involved in the show seemed to really love being a part of it. And obviously meeting Andrew and, of course, following your story. I mean, it was heartbreaking in a sense.

But, you did it. I mean, you mounted a Broadway musical. It ran. You got some terrific reviews. The audience was in tears and they were applauding. And it happened. And the fact that there is a certain amount of external success that needs to occur financially in order to make it happen for a long amount of time is rough and this is life.

But, I just want to thank you for kind of taking us along on the journey with you because we’ve been doing this now for awhile. And I’m starting to realize that we’re chronicling our lives on this thing to some extent.

**John:** [laughs]

**Craig:** And, you know, I’ve certainly had my dark night of the soul when every critic in America punched me in the mouth, again, last February. And so I know that this is hard, and it’s emotional, and it’s difficult because we unfortunately must repeatedly open ourselves up to pain every time we open ourselves up to care about what we do.

But, the pain will subside and the achievement is permanent, which I think is wonderful.

**John:** And it’s one of the reasons why it was great to have Richard here on the episode this week is that Donnie Darko is a film that went through those sort of highs and lows, where you had the experience of everyone loving your script, and then the challenge of actually trying to get it made. And then the elation of getting it made. And then the challenge of the first reaction at Sundance and not knowing how it was going to be perceived years later.

Things never really end. They never really stop. And Donnie Darko is a thing that that keeps going.

Go was a movie that I loved, my very first movie that we had so much excitement and enthusiasm but it hugely underperformed. And yet I’m so grateful that it’s a thing I got to do.

And so that’s one of the sort of general lessons to take about all the work we do is you were able to make something. You were able to create something that exists in the world because of your efforts. And that’s something not a lot of people can say.

**Craig:** That’s right.

**John:** And so it’s a luxury of what we get to do.

**Richard:** Absolutely. In the end, also you mentioned time travel at the beginning. The lesson is that time destroys everything, but time also heals everything.

**Craig:** Whoa.

**Richard:** I don’t know what the message of that is.

**Craig:** Geez, you just blew my freaking mind, Richard Kelly!

**Richard:** Destruction is a form of creation.

**John:** I agree with you there.

**Richard:** [laughs]

**John:** Wow, this guy is deep —

**Craig:** God, Richard Kelly.

**John:** It got deep in the middle, too.

**Craig:** Look how Richard Kelly can do stuff. He’s so amazing. I feel like he needs to go. [laughs] I just have to take care of this on the side.

**John:** Richard, thank you so much for being our guest on the episode.

**Richard:** Thanks for having me.

**Craig:** Richard Kelly, you’re the best man. Thank you so much for doing this.

**Richard:** All right. Thank you, Craig. Thank you, John.

**John:** If you want to write a question or talk to me or Craig, on Twitter I am @johnaugust. Craig is @clmazin. Richard, what are you on Twitter?

**Richard:** I am @jrichardkelly.

**John:** So, people can tweet you if they have questions about things?

**Richard:** Absolutely.

**John:** If you have longer questions for me or Craig, the best address is ask@johnaugust.com. That is where we will gather up questions so we can do Craig’s favorite kind of episode, the one he doesn’t have to prepare for at all, which is the question-and-answer episodes.

**Craig:** Yay!

**John:** A reminder to everybody to set your alarm so you wake by 10am tomorrow to buy tickets for the live show in Los Angeles if you are planning on coming to that. And thank you guys all so much listening.

**Craig:** Thanks Richard Kelly. Thanks John. Bye.

**John:** Thanks. Bye.

LINKS:

* [Tickets are on sale tomorrow morning](https://www.wgfoundation.org/writing-seminars/) for the December 19th Scriptnotes Live Holiday Show
* Richard Kelly [on IMDb](http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0446819/), [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Kelly_(director)) and [Twitter](https://twitter.com/JRichardKelly)
* [Donnie Darko](http://archive.hi-res.net/donniedarko/), and [on Amazon](http://www.amazon.com/dp/B004ZBFRTY/?tag=johnaugustcom-20)
* [The Donnie Darko Book](http://www.amazon.com/dp/0571221246/?tag=johnaugustcom-20)
* [Scope creep](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scope_creep) on Wikipedia
* [Coin](https://onlycoin.com/) for all your cards
* [The Science and Entertainment Exchange](http://www.scienceandentertainmentexchange.org)
* [Hotel Tonight](http://www.hoteltonight.com/)
* [Big Fish](http://www.bigfishthemusical.com/) is on Broadway through December 29th
* [Outro](http://johnaugust.com/2013/scriptnotes-the-outros) by Scriptnotes listener Matthew Chilelli

Scriptnotes, Ep 117: Not Just Dialogue — Transcript

November 16, 2013 Scriptnotes Transcript

The original post for this episode can be found here.

John August: Hello and welcome. My name is John August.

Craig Mazin: My name is Craig Mazin.

John: And this is Episode 117, the Not Just Dialogue edition of Scriptnotes, a podcast about screenwriting and things that are interesting to screenwriters.

Craig, how are you?

Craig: I’m good. I’m real good.

John: You’re less depressed than last week?

Craig: Yeah. The depression has faded. Anxiety and depression have given way to a new day of hope. A New Hope. That’s a good idea. That’s a great name for a movie.

John: That’s a great title for an episode of a long-running series.

Craig: Right. But I wouldn’t want to start it with number one, that’s boring. I would want to start this at number four.

John: Yes.

Craig: Eddie Izzard has this bit like kids have learned to count 4, 5, 6, 1, 2, 3, 9, 10.

John: [laughs] Yes, it is madness.

I’m overall good. Today I crossed a breaking point with pumpkin spice. And it just needs to stop. We need to stop trying to make pumpkin spice a thing.

Craig: Oh, I thought that they were one of the erstwhile members of the Spice Girls that you were pissed off at.

John: Oh yeah, Pumpkin Spice? No, she got booted out of the band really early on.

Craig: [affect British accent] What, I can’t play with you? What?

John: Partly it’s because I’m in Los Angeles and it’s actually pretty warm here today. But when you go into a place and they’re trying to push pumpkin spice on you it’s like, no, it’s 80 degrees. Stop with the pumpkin spice. I don’t want pumpkin spice. I don’t want Christmas Tree lots. I’m just not in a fall mood at all.

Craig: Wow, this is about the most white people problem, white person problem in history. What’s with all the pumpkins? Hey, guys…guys…I like pumpkin spice. Because I’m Jewish, I’ve always had Christmas envy. So, I’m obsessed with Christmas. I love Christmas. And even the vacations now that I take with my family are very Christmas-y vacations. So, last year we were in Quebec City, which is this incredibly Christmas-y place. [laughs]

And then now we’re going to go to Vienna because it’s like Christmas Town.

John: It is like Christmas Town.

Craig: So, I want everything to be mulled and pumpkin spiced and nutmegged. And I want everything to be red and green. And I don’t care. I don’t care. In fact, I want more pumpkin. You know, my beef is not enough pumpkin spice.

John: All right. We’re going to duel over this.

Craig: Mm-hmm.

John: Because dueling is going to come back I sense in a big way.

Craig: When people offer you pumpkin spice do you get all in their face? Do you get angry? Angry John?

John: I usually smack it out of their hands. That’s basically what I do.

Craig: Like what’s wrong with that guy? Who’s this guy that doesn’t like pumpkin spice? It’s November!

John: Yeah. It doesn’t feel like November. It doesn’t feel like Christmas at all.

Craig: I know. Well, Los Angeles is the worst in that regard.

John: Today on the show I need to give you props because you actually set the entire agenda for today’s podcast. I said, Craig, I have no idea what we’re going to talk about because we were trying to have this guest and the guest will be rescheduled for another time.

Craig: Right.

John: So, I said, I don’t really know what we’re going to talk about. And you suggested three things which I think are great things. And so I’m throwing them under a general umbrella of movies are not just dialogue and a screenwriter’s job is not just writing the dialogues. And it’s everything that happens in a movie. And so I thought we could talk about that in a general sense.

Craig: Great.

John: Particularly sound, which you brought up, which I think is crucial.

Craig: Yeah.

John: You suggested we talk about naming characters, which is important, and we should dig into that a bit.

And then finally a really good topic of when it just doesn’t come out right and what a screenwriter should do when his or her movie is not what was envisioned and what happens next.

Craig: That sounds good the way you just said it, although I do feel like I’ve just been set up for terrible failure.

John: I think it’s going to be just lovely and good. I think it’s going to be a great show.

Craig: All right. Well, let me just try and do something with this pit of anxiety in my stomach and I’ll do my best.

John: So, first off, you can concentrate on getting ready for it because we have some housekeeping.

Craig: Great.

John: First off, t-shirts. So, t-shirts are being preordered right now, so if you would like a t-shirt that says Scriptnotes that’s black that’s really cool. You can go to store.johnaugust.com and order your t-shirt. Like the last time we did t-shirts, basically people will order the t-shirts, then we’ll print exactly the order that we have, and then we’ll mail them out.

So, the deadline for ordering your t-shirt is this Friday. So, come to store.johnaugust.com and order your t-shirt if you would like one.

Craig: Good. Good. I have a little housekeeping, too. Do you have more?

John: I do. I have two more things.

Craig: Oh, well then I’ll know when to start. [laughs]

John: Second thing is I’m doing a talkback for Big Fish on November 23.

Craig: Oh yeah!

John: That’s a Saturday. So, if you are coming to that show on Saturday, November 23, you need to email ask@johnaugust.com so we can actually have a headcount because it matters whether we’re going to do it in one space or another space based on how many people I have coming to this thing. So, if you would like to come see me and some other people behind Big Fish talk about the show that you’ve just seen, email ask@johnaugust.com and let us know that that’s happening.

Craig: Great.

John: And, finally, this is kind of the big one, so, we are maybe a live show.

Craig: Hmm…

John: Are you aware of this, Craig?

Craig: I am aware of it. And it’s funny because now that I think about it, when we do the live show, which you will shortly describe, I think there should be some sort of pumpkin spice beverage. It’s a very holiday season.

John: It’s a holiday-themed show. That does not mean that we have to have pumpkin spice, though. There’s other things we can do to celebrate the holidays.

Craig: Scrooge.

John: But, not final, not locked down, but you might want to mark your calendar for Thursday December 19 in Los Angeles. We’re planning on doing a live show. A venue will be announced soon.

Craig: Great.

John: As will ticket information. But just mark your calendars for that. I’m excited to be back in Los Angeles doing this thing that we do.

Craig: It will be fun. Los Angeles shows are great. That’s obviously where a large amount of our listeners are. Although, lately we’ve been getting tweets from Serbia, from England, it’s been great.

I have a little bit of housekeeping, too. Not that we’re politicians, but I feel oddly required to disclose this. At one point, my One Cool Thing was WinesTilSoldOut.com, which I really like.

John: Yes.

Craig: And I got the loveliest email from a woman who works there. She said she heard the podcast and she was so happy. And said, “A lot of people don’t realize this, but we’re actually a very small family-owned business. It’s just our family that does this.” And they were very — and they don’t really advertise or anything, and they were very, very, well, they were just delighted. And as a result, they’re sending me a free bottle of wine.

John: Ooh.

Craig: And I would feel guilty if I didn’t mention that.

John: Yeah, you need to disclose that.

Craig: Yeah, that basically now my One Cool Thing, now I’m starting to think, oh, my One Cool Thing should just generate swag.

John: [laughs] Oh, swag.

Craig: Swag!

John: Swag.

Let’s get to our show today. And so I really like this topic of sound, but I think it’s important to discuss in the bigger umbrella of so many people think about what a screenwriter’s job is as just being the guy who writes the dialogue.

Craig: Right.

John: And so it’s just those things that he characters are saying. I had this bit of a run in with Jessica Alba, like who I never actually physically met, where she had said something very dismissive about like good actors never read the script, or never follow the script. I’m like, well that’s a stupid thing to say, Jessica Alba.

Craig: Yeah.

John: And what I thought was so stupid about that comment was it also implied that the script is just the dialogue and dismisses the fact that like, oh, the whole reason that you’re in this scene is because of the script. The whole reason your character exists is because of the script. So, I thought we would have a little discussion about everything else that goes on the page in order to make a movie and sound is a great way to start with that.

Craig: Yeah. Screenwriting is world building. We are doing everything. And sometimes when I talk to people who really don’t understand what a screenwriter does. I mean, of course there are people out there who don’t even know that screenwriters do the dialogue. They think the actors improv everything.

But a lot of times they are unaware that we essentially write everything. We are accountable to create a setting and describe what you are seeing and hearing in all aspects. We’re required to do it.

For me, sound is a really interesting one. And I’ve been concentrating on it more and more as I write now because as we progress through time and technology begins to disrupt the world around us and the way people interact with entertainment, one thing that has persisted somewhat counter-intuitively is one of the oldest ways to experience entertainment and that is to drive, park, walk into a big building, and watch a movie with a bunch of other people. And even though theaters are changing and now you see a lot of theaters where you get to book your seat, and it’s a big comfy chair, and they bring you food and stuff, and they’re really working on the 3D and all the rest of it, the experience still holds attraction for people.

One thing that sets movies, motion pictures, apart from television, watching movies on your iPad or on TV but going to see a movie in a theater is that you’re hearing the movie as well. And I don’t care what kind of deal you have in your house you don’t have that kind of deal. Movies sound better in theaters than anywhere else.

And so I think it’s important for us to think about that as we’re writing, because that’s part of what the attraction is now for people. It’s a huge part of the experience.

John: Well, experience is really the key word here. You have to be thinking about as a writer what is it going to feel like to be in that space watching the movie with an audience, with a great picture, with great sound, and what are the possibilities you have if you were that audience member and feeling it right there in that space.

And so there’s subtleties to sound that can be really crucial and great. The subtle scrapes, the rasps, the thunder cracking in the distance. These are great things and they belong on the page where they are appropriate. Now, you can’t choke your pages with every possible sound effect. And most scenes aren’t really going to talk about the sounds. You have to be very judicious about the moments you are going to sort of — every word on a script page is precious material, so you don’t want to waste those words on things that aren’t important. But sound can be very important. And every time you are thinking about that scene, you have to ask yourself what — is there anything about the sound of the scene that’s going to be unique and special and important?

If you’re setting something in an environment where just giving us the setting will probably tell us what it sounds like, that’s fine. But if there’s something special about it, let us know.

So, if you’re at an airport, if you’re just generally going through a busy terminal, telling us “busy terminal” will probably give us that sense of like the Walla-Walla-Walla and all that stuff that’s happening. And there’s going to be background PA announcements. Great. Don’t waste our time telling us about that.

But if you are on the tarmac and people are loading in bags and that’s where your action takes place, it’s incredibly important to remind us how loud that is and how it feels, and what that experience is like. And that has to happen on the page or else it’s not going to happen in the reader’s mind.

Craig: Absolutely. Sound, well one fun way to use it is for transitions and we’ve talked about transitions before and the use of sound as opposed to — I think we’ve become very good at detecting visual transitions. They are the oldest kind of transitions in motion picture filmmaking — dissolves, wipes, fades, and so on. And also the trick transitions, a light bulb that’s the sun

We become cynical about it. it’s a funny thing. We always think of watching movies and not listening to them, but we naturally over time become cynical about things we see because we’ve seen them before. Hearing is closer to smell, I think, neurologically in the sense that we don’t become jaded to the sounds. The sounds are actually very disruptive and they actually, I think, connect emotionally with us more quickly than visual information does.

Visual information is processed in the back of your head. Sound is processed in a whole bunch of different places. But, we know for instance that there are people who stutter who can sing, but they can’t speak without disruption. There are stroke patients who can’t speak at all, but they can sing what they want to say. There’s something going on in the brain that is fundamental here. And I like to think of sound as more of a mainline heroine than the visual.

So, also, I think there’s an opportunity now for us to play around with it, for instance, we’re talking about an airport. Well, we all know that we have a choice there as we’re building the world of the airport to just describe it as general Walla-Walla, or just the hustle and bustle of the airport. And in the reader’s mind they’re like, okay, I’ve got that.

But if you can use sound to help define your character and their focus of attention and thus the perspective of the scene. What is the character looking at? Does the rest of that sound fade away and all he can hear is the tap-tap-tap of somebody sitting across from him or the sound of a distant alarm because he’s panicked. You can use all of this to get right into the deeper parts of the brain.

So, as we go through our scene building and we get out of the kind of first blush world of what are people saying and who are they saying it to, and get into the world of the visual and the aural — a-u-r-a-l, don’t put the audio second. I actually think we should put it first. Sound to me is the thing that’s the most exciting in filmmaking in the finishing process because that’s when you suddenly — it’s the sound that makes it seem like a movie.

John: Yes. Anyone who’s experienced a bad indie movie, you can tell a lot of times how much money was spent on the movie by how good the sound is.

Craig: Right.

John: And whatever the picture quality, it’s the sound quality that is actually what tells you how professionally finished this movie was.

Craig: Yeah.

John: So, I want to step back to a thing you said earlier about sort of subjectivity versus objectively of sound. Because you’re describing in terms of like are we just hearing all the Walla-Walla of the busy airport, or are we focused in on what a character is doing? That’s essentially the same kind of choice as you would make visually with lens selection. Are you looking at the whole world? Are you wide? Are you objective?

Craig: Right.

John: Or, are you zoomed in really tight on what is happening right in this one very moment? So, either what this character is seeing, are we hearing the sound of what that character is seeing? Or just you’re experiencing the world as a character experiences the world. And those are very different choices. And you’re not always going to make those — declare what your intention is on the page. Most times you’re going to sort of set a tone for what the movie kind of feels like and stick with that tone.

Either the movie is going to be very subjective and it’s going to very much feel like it’s from the character’s POV, even if we’re seeing the character, or it’s going to feel like it’s wide and open and it’s the whole world that you’re experiencing at once. You’re experiencing it like the camera is another character in that space and you’re watching it with them.

Craig: Right.

John: But those are fundamental choices and to not think about that is to give up a choice and you don’t want to do that.

Craig: It’s giving up not only a choice. It’s giving up what often is your best choice, your most effective choice. And it’s hard for us. I think everybody understands that the nature of a screenplay is to try and visualize something. We’re told constantly from the beginning of our time as screenwriters to write visually. No one every says write soundily. [laughs] You know, we don’t even know what the word is, really. Aurally, I guess.

John: Yeah, it would be aurally, but that’s confusing.

Craig: Auditorily. But we often — we naturally — naturally we will say “close on,” “reveal,” “angle on.” We do this all the time in screenplays. We need to give as much service to what things sound like. As you point out, when it is salient and informative, as always, when we talk about these things we talk about intention. And what can provide, what can help you provide your intention to the audience in a way that is interesting, unexpected, exciting.

And so lately I’ve just really been playing around with sound. I mean, the script I’m writing right now, sound is actually a plot point. It matters. And that was an intentional choice, too. An that’s what started me thinking about this, because I realized it’s the kind of thing that makes you want to see the movie in a theater. And I want the theater experience to be special for people.

You don’t want to go down a road where you just… — Look, I mean, I’ve written movies where frankly you could just watch them on an iPad and it’s fine. But lately I’ve been thinking to myself it’s probably a bad idea. [laughs] I mean, not that I want to change creatively the heart of whatever it is that I’m doing just to sucker people into a big room, but if I can give them more in that big room, that’s a nice thing to do. And an effective thing to do.

John: Let’s step outside for a second and talk about how sound actually exists, how sound is created in films. Because I think someone who hasn’t been through the process of actually making a movie probably doesn’t have a sense of like how artificial sound really is in films.

Craig: Yeah.

John: So, on the set while you’re filming a movie there is a sound recordist. And that sound recordist, you can often see the person who is at the board, and there’s another person with a boom who is at the pole that’s holding the microphone down above the actors heads. That’s a very classic way you record sound in films. Sometimes it could be more than one boom. Sometimes the actors will have lavalier mics that will also be recording things.

Craig: Right.

John: But that’s only recoding really the dialogue. Everything else that you are seeing and hearing — not seeing, but hearing in a film was created after the fact basically.

Craig: That’s right.

John: That’s all post-production audio. And until you’ve actually been through that process and seen how incredibly elaborate it is and how seriously those folks take their job, you don’t have appreciation for how completely constructed it is. It’s as if, yo know, really basically it’s like you are shooting green screens the whole time where from an audio perspective those actors talking, that’s the only thing you’ve filmed and everything else around them had to be created after the fact.

Craig: In fact, it has to be that way because we want to be able to hear the dialogue cleanly and combine it with other sound as we so desire. As the director views the cut and listens to the mix, he or she needs to be able to change the sound as they wish. The one thing you can’t do is change the sound if it’s married on a track to dialogue. So, in fact, by requirement sets and movie scenes are designed to be as quiet and unsoundy as possible.

So, all you get is the dialogue. But, what I find interesting is that if you create space for a specific sound in the script, it will change the way the scene is shot. And it will — I worked with a DP once who would always refer to clues. He would say, “You know, there are all these clues in the script.” [laughs] And it’s true. You’re leaving clues for everybody so that they know how to put it all together in a way so that six months later, or eight months later, or a year later when you’re in your final mix, there are clues.

And they have the script there. The script does not go away. I am so pleased when I walk into a mix session and I see guys at this big, big board and they have the screenplay open in front of them.

John: Yeah.

Craig: They’re looking for clues. So, why don’t you put some in there for them. That’s basically the idea.

John: So, what these sound folks are doing is there’s sort of two parts to the process for sound. First is they’re editing sound, and so they are finding the sounds that would make sense in the scenes. And they will often have multiple choices for what those sounds could be. And there are things that you would not believe they could have multiple options for, but they will. Which is like a hand touching a door knob. And so when you’re in a sound — they will edit all those in so that they’ll all line up perfectly. And then you as the director will listen to all the choices for this is what it sounds like when his hand touches the door knob.

Craig: Right.

John: So, it’s a sound, they could had a library of sounds for doing this. They may have recorded that in Foley. But you will listen to that and you will go insane listening to all the choices for what it sounds like when that hand touches the door knob. And they will have the option for, well, does his wedding ring touch the door knob metal as it turns. They will have all those options.

And they are taking that so seriously because it helps create the reality of the film. Now, the challenge for the writer is how do you portray those kind of choices/decisions when they’re important on script, the page. And there are lots of choices.

Sometimes you are going to onomatopoeia. You are finding that made up word or that just perfect word that captures the sense of what that sounds like. The sizzle, the buzz, the crackle, the way you want that thing to sounds. What does it sound like as a box is being dragged across a gritty floor? Well, that’s probably a very specific thing and you may need to find the right verb to help sell what that sounds like.

But when you pick the right word for it, suddenly we hear it in our heads the right way.

Craig: Yeah.

John: And you’re trying to do that for the reader. Ultimately, a year later, some sound editor will be trying to find the right sound to portray that feeling to the audience member.

Craig: Yeah. I tend to be guided in this way. When I — let’s say for instance your example of a box being dragged across a gritty floor. I know that if I write, “Jim drags the box across the gritty floor,” that the professionals will know what that means. And they will offer, they will automatically put it in. And, really, for things like that, it’s almost a passive process with the director.

The way this works, for those of you who haven’t sat through a sound session for a movie, the folks that are combining all the audio elements, which are dialogue, music — dialogue, score, music that’s within the scene, sound effects. They play it back. And they play it back. You know, we talk about reels, so they play back a 16-minute chunk, say. And as they’re playing it there’s a footage counter on a big display underneath the screen. And the director, or the producer, or whoever is in the session makes notes.

When they hear something that’s off, that they don’t like, or that they want to change, or they want to make louder, or softer, they make a note of what the footage number was and what it was. When they’re done with that reel everybody goes through and talks about it and the sound mixers take notes.

So, you might say, “You know what, when it was being dragged across the floor, is there something a little grittier, a littler dirtier, and maybe not quite so loud? That almost sounded like glass instead of grit.” And they’ll go, okay, yeah, we’ll work on that.

Now, for me, when I’m writing, the areas where I want to really call stuff out is when it’s not the norm.

John: Yes. Exactly.

Craig: And to me it’s the not norm that is also very exciting for people. I mean, there’s this wonderful moment in The Sopranos where an assassination occurs at a table. And you don’t hear the bullet. You hear the sound of the high pitched noise that you get in your ear when you’ve been deafened because a gun just went off next to your head. It’s very impressionistic. And then, so in that case it needed to be called out. That suddenly all sound goes away except for this distant high pitched tininess kind of whine.

That’s the kind of stuff that I think is great to think about as you’re writing so that you can surprise people so it’s not just another gun going off.

John: I want to go back to this example of a box being dragged across a gritty floor, because what I want to stress is that as a screenwriter you probably wouldn’t highlight that as a sound effect if it was happening in front of the camera. So, if everyone in the scene is seeing this box being dragged across, it’s probably not worth the words to throw at it to describe that that sound sounds like.

Where it does become very important is if someone is trying to move it silently so no one else hears it, and that scraping sound, that gritty sound is really important. And that becomes an important story point is the noise that was made.

Or, if that’s happening just off stage, so we’re not seeing it, but we or the characters are hearing it, it’s incredibly important that you’re describing that sound and describing from the subjective point of view of the character on screen what they’re hearing.

Craig: Right.

John: That can create suspense, tension — what is that sound? And that’s where you end up spending 15 minutes trying to find the right word to describe what that sound sounds like.

Craig: Right. And the important thing, as you point out, is that we’re thinking about it, so it’s this other dimension of storytelling that sometimes we neglect and I do think it’s so important that we not neglect it because in the end there are people that can do amazing things. The ability to control sound in a movie far surpasses the ability to control anything else — performance, lighting, set design, everything is all subject to circumstance. The roll of the dice of the day. Sound can be absolutely perfected and they have so much ready to go. And then if they don’t they can design something just for your movie that people haven’t heard before.

I mean, the famous story of the guys who went out and tried to figure out what the blaster noise would be for Star Trek and they ended up whacking a bar against a high tension steel cable and marry that with a couple other things. And it became that noise. They invented a sound.

John: That was Star Wars, though. Not Star Trek.

Craig: Oh, I’m sorry. Did I say Star Trek? I meant Star Wars. Yes, Star Wars.

Star Trek, the sounds in Star Trek, too, though. I mean, if I say to you, “Transporter, start,” no transporter, Star Trek, you hear it. [laughs] You hear that — it’s like music but it’s sound, it’s a shimmer. These things are invented and they will last in your minds the way that music lyrics will last in your minds.

The sound of the space — the Martian vehicles, the tripods in Spielberg’s War of the Worlds are so distinct. That weird alien ship porn noise — I can hear it right now in my head.

I can’t see anything else really and I can’t see the thing. I could not draw it for you as well as I could make the sound for you.

So, let’s just collectively really think about that, when it’s appropriate, and when it can help us. It’s a good thing to do.

John: Here’s an exercise that we talked about when I was on the panel in Austin for Alien. So, I was a panel where we deconstructed Alien. And we were showing the opening startup sequence to Alien, basically where the ship wakes up. And what I stressed to keep in mind is that if you had no sound, if you were watching this in an airplane with no sound, you would still know what was happening because visually it tells you the ship is waking up and that the people are waking up. And you can watch that first sequence and it makes complete sense with no sound whatsoever.

So, you don’t hear people talking, it makes complete sense. The same thing can hold true for the audio in that situation where if you turn off the picture and just listen to the sound, you are hearing the ship waking up and it’s very, very clear.

Craig: Yes.

John: The music and sound are telling you that this thing is coming to life and it’s very smart.

So, what I would stress for writers to do is whatever scene you’re working on right now, you’re sort of looping it in your head, probably. You see the whole thing. Turn off the sound and see it all visually and make sure it all makes sense visually to you. And then do another pass where like you turn off the picture and just think about what everything sounds like.

And most scenes, there’s probably not going to be anything special that you’re going to want to highlight sound wise, but there might be. And it may not occur to you that there could be something interesting sound wise to highlight unless you try that that experiment.

Craig: Yes. And it’s a chance for you to impart information in a way that’s much more satisfying, and immediate, and true to the audience than somebody talking about it. So, if we’re in a ship and it looks a bit junky and we hear kind of a clunky rattle from somewhere in its depths, and the sound of a leaky pipe, we learn something about this ship and those sounds are wonderful. And they really do put you somewhere. More than seen.

John: Yeah, it’s a very primal thing. I think what you’re talking about, your memory of War of the Worlds, is I think because it actually keys into some sort of lizard brain thing about sort of our assumptions of what this is. And there’s a danger out there. We’re very keyed into that because we are creatures that spend half of our life in darkness and always had to sort of listen for predators out there. So, we do key into those things in a very special way.

Craig: Yeah, it’s why people listen to poetry set to music but don’t read poetry. I mean, some of it’s not poetry. [laughs] But they don’t even read bad poetry. They will listen to bad poetry.

John: They will listen to this podcast and not read the transcript.

Craig: [laughs] Exactly.

John: Great. Let’s move onto our next topic which is naming characters which is, I think, a great topic to have because that’s one of the things I spend so much time on in the initial part of figuring out a script is figuring out exactly the right names for not just my main characters, but sort of everyone in the world so that I know who these people are before I get started. And I have a very hard time writing a character if I haven’t picked his or her name.

Craig: It’s so funny, so do I. And it is a very torturous process. I don’t know if you’ve ever had the experience of having to change the name because somebody comes to you in the process and says, “We can’t clear this name.” I mean, there are all these rules about clearing names. It’s a weird thing.

If you write a movie and you put a character’s name in, like let’s say Tyler Durden. If there’s only one Tyler Durden in America, you’re screwed. You can’t do it. Because that person could come and say, “This obviously is about me. There’s only one Tyler Durden.” So, you kind of need lots of Tyler Durdens, or no Tyler Durdens in order to use the name.

But if they make you change it…I’m getting anxious even thinking about it, because it’s a disruption. It’s as if your husband had to change his name and you had to call him a different name. It’s traumatic. We connect with the names so closely.

John: Let’s talk about that connection, because the name is generally the first thing we are going to be able to draw assumptions about that character from. And so if a Tiffany is different than a Bertha, and you and I both see different characters for a Tiffany and then for a Bertha.

Craig: Right.

John: And we have our whole bundle of expectations and assumptions that come with those two kinds of names, to tip off sort of socioeconomic background, of kind of looks. We don’t associate hot with Berthas. It can talk to us about their ethnicity, their nationality. It can give us a sense of their age. A Mabel is either very old or is a little baby. But there’s no Mabels who are 30.

Craig: Right. Exactly right. And this is an area where I do see writers dating themselves a bit. It’s always a good thing. The wonderful resources online now to see what the most popular names are, not just now, but they were ten years ago or 20 years ago. And for every country. I’m constantly looking for foreign names to see what popular names are.

And, of course, you can go against the grain and make a point of going against the grain with a name, but there’s some obvious things to not do. Don’t name your characters super boring names because that’s just super boring. There’s no reason for anybody anymore to be Officer Smith.

Smith — even that in and of itself is so ridiculous, it could almost be interesting. It’s more like Harper. It’s a name that’s not like Smith or Jones but it’s just so bland that you don’t care.

John: Harper is one of those weirdly overused things in scripts. I’ve used it. Because it’s not that common of a name really in real life, but I think on paper for whatever reason it’s there all the time, as a first name and a last name.

Craig: And also it gives nothing to anybody who is trying to visualize. If I walk into a room, I need to get a loan, and I sit down across a loan officer and his name is Jim Harper, I guess I’m just looking at a white man between 30 and 60 in a suit who’s just a blah….

John: I’m sort of seeing John Krasinski from The Office, but that’s because his name is Jim Halpert, so it was close to that.

Craig: Right. There’s a blandness to it. And in television I actually think sometimes they need to do that because you’re with them week, after week, after week, and at some point a silly name — sorry, that’s the wrong term. A name that is noticeable, that sticks out, is going to become annoying over time. Sam Malone is a perfectly great television name. It’s a terrible movie name.

John: Yeah. Sam Malone would be like a generic sheriff in movie land.

Craig: Right. It would be a boring sheriff. Now, on the other hand, another thing to not do is to get precious and stupid with your names. Please forgive me, Pacific Rim, but Stacker Pentecost is ridiculous. That is a ridiculous name. It takes me out of the movie. It seems almost like a spoof.

John: Yeah.

Craig: It is such an overdone, hyper-masculinization of a name. It’s got bible thumping weirdness to it. Stacker is nonsense. Pentecost is way too on the nose. It’s just crazy. I mean, Cypher Raige is terrible because it’s just — it’s not a good idea to do that.

John: No one in real life would be named Cypher Raige. If your name were Cypher Raige —

Craig: You would change it!

John: The first thing anyone would say to you is like, “Really? Really that’s your name?”

Craig: So, you’re angry and mysterious?

John: I guess so.

Craig: Let me tell you, if your name is Cypher Raige, the one thing you can’t be is angry and mysterious. At that point you have to be happy and an open book, because then it’s funny. But, those kinds, you don’t want to go down that path. So, you don’t want to go down crazy name path. I tend to try and studiously avoid the on-the-nose names that imply character things. I find them precious.

John: Like the character Precious?

Craig: No, that was great. [laughs] No, but I mean, you know, when somebody is named Small, know, or Loneman.

John: Oh yeah, that’s a dangerous thing.

Craig: Yeah.

John: So, I’m working on this project which if people want to go back to the What’s Next episode, I’m actually going in to have a meeting on that preexisting property thing. And so I had to pick character’s names, because I actually had to sort of — I have to pitch this thing.

And so it was a sudden kind of realization, like I had to really figure out who these characters were because they were going to have to have names. I was going to have to be able to pitch their names. And so I figured out their names, but then I actually spent a good half hour trying to figure out how to spell this woman’s name, because it’s one of those names that could be spelled different ways. And because you’re going to be looking at that on the page, you know, every page she’s going to have dialogue. It has to be the right way to spell her name.

And so even though no one watching the movie would ever see her name spelled, it had to be spelled the right way on the page so that it would be — so you would get the right impression of her every time you saw her give a line of dialogue.

Craig: Right.

John: So, that’s a crucial thing. And honestly figuring out the other guy, once I made a decision about his nationality, that put me in a whole different place in terms of what kinds of names would remind me who he was. Because remember that you’re setting up these characters and somebody could like really skip past one little thing that told you where that person was from, but if the name helps remind you that it is that person, that person is from some place, you’re going to be in a much better place.

And so you might forget that, well, Parks and Recreation, there’s Tom Haverford, is a guy of South Asian heritage, but that’s part of the joke is that he has a really boring white guy name.

Craig: Right.

John: And he’s a sort of South Asian looking guy. In a film, you probably want to make sure that character has a name that would remind you that he is that guy, because if it’s been 30 pages since we’ve seen him last, you’re going to forget that he is anything special because of all those pages in the past.

Craig: Right. And that is a very —

John: So, it would be Sunil or something else that could remind you like, oh, that guy is this guy.

Craig: Yeah. Because we’re only getting one episode of the show. One long episode. And the care that you’re describing, even the spelling of a name, is critical because these things mean things and they impart things. I have a character in the script I’m writing now named Sarah. So, the question is is it Sara, or is it Sarah?

Well, to me Sara is a little younger, it’s a little brighter, it’s a little more bubbly. Sarah is a little more worldly, a little more weathered, a little more adult, a little more serious.

John: Or, a dancer in Big Fish is Sarrah.

Craig: Ah, now that’s —

John: The mermaid.

Craig: And that says exotic, eccentric, artistic, whimsical. These things mean things, you know. They do.

John: Absolutely. That extra R does change a lot of your expectations.

Craig: It tells you about their parents.

John: Yeah, it tells you about their parents, exactly.

Craig: And that tells us about them. And these things can’t just be tossed off as, well, I’m just going to name her Jill.

John: Yeah.

Craig: You know, and he’s going to be Frank. And, for god’s sakes, if you’re character’s name is Frank, please don’t make him frank. It’s like that stuff makes me nuts. But, anyway, I mean, the most important thing is never write Stacker Pentecost. That’s a name that should just — we should never hear that ever.

John: I would say the second most important thing is pick your primary character’s names first. And then do not let anyone else — try to not let anyone else have the first letter of their name be the same as those major characters.

Craig: Absolutely right.

John: So, if you possibly can, no two characters in your script should have the same first letter of their name. If for some reason you need to, the names need to be wildly different so that we will never confuse them as readers, because that just kills you when it’s like “I don’t remember which person this is,” or like these two people are talking and they both have Fs start in their names. Frank and Phil. Even Frank and Phil sometimes your head — one is a PH and one’s an F.

Craig: Yeah, but it’s a “ph” sound.

John: They feel the same. A “ph” sound.

Craig: It starts to make your world small and it starts to make the reader — they don’t even realize that they’re making a judgment that you just aren’t that imaginative and you only know one consonant. You just don’t want to do that.

Do you know why, I mean obviously the name Sandy in Identify Thief was part of what need to happen, he needed a name like that, but do you know why —

John: An ambiguously gendered name.

Craig: Exactly. But do you know why Melissa McCarthy’s name is Diana?

John: I don’t.

Craig: Well, she picked her name, because she didn’t know what her name was. And Melissa and I had this whole thing that when she was growing up she was obsessed with Wonder Woman and wanted to be like Wonder Woman.

John: Aw.

Craig: And so she chose the name Diana. And then it was really difficult to figure out what her actual name was and I spent a lot of time because I thought, okay, just from the look of her, she’s Scotch-Irish, but I didn’t want her name to be flowery. I actually wanted it to be a very truncated sort of glum Midwestern name.

John: Like Meg?

Craig: Yeah. And so I ended up with Dawn Budgie because it just —

John: Dawn is perfect.

Craig: Dawn is just Dawn, and Budgie because —

John: Budgie, you’re close to being that sort of like don’t be what the name is, but because it’s a punch line, it’s a late reveal.

Craig: Yeah. It’s a name about a pretty creature but it’s kind of an ugly word. I wanted it to be a downer. I just wanted her to be able to say, “That’s the worst name I’ve ever heard.” And it is, in fact, one of the worst names I’ve ever heard. But we spend time on these things and so I guess we are collectively encouraging all of you to spend time on them.

John: Absolutely. You should obsess a little too much about character’s names because you’re going to be staring at those character’s names the entire time through.

And, yes, you can make a change midway through the script and rename somebody, but it’s hard —

Craig: It’s traumatic.

John: It’s traumatic.

Craig: It’s traumatic. Now, I have a question for you. When you rewrite a script, what’s your attitude about changing the character names of the screenplay you’re rewriting?

John: I would only do it if there were like a fundamental issue where there was confusability between things, or if there was now a new actor in who just that name does not at all belong with that new actor.

Craig: Right.

John: So, I can’t even think of what an example would be, but a character’s name, there’s an O’Malley, and Will Smith is playing that role, that’s not going to make a lot of sense. And so that might be a possibility for changing names. But I think it’s honestly a little bit shady to sort of be the writer who comes in and just changes character’s names willy-nilly as if you’re really rewriting, as if you’re changing the characters.

Craig: Right. I completely agree. And this sort of goes to a general professional courtesy thing. You hear this from people all the time. When they get rewritten, one of their hugest complains — oh, that’s the worst grammar ever.

John: Yeah. That was terrible.

Craig: One of their significant complaints is that the subsequent writer changed the freaking names and they just did it for no reason, it’s still the same guy, in the same house, in the same job, doing the same stuff. A lot of the dialogue changed. There are a few new scenes. This wasn’t a page one rewrite. It wasn’t a reinvention of the movie. It was largely about dialogue, but they changed the names. What was the point of that?

And my feeling is you should default to not changing the names. You change them if you must, as you described. Obviously in the case of Identify Thief there was a gender switch. Names had to change. But, if you can preserve the names, why not?

John: Yeah. As long as the names aren’t actually hurting you. That’s the situation.

Craig: Right.

John: So, if changing the name opens a whole new opportunity, or for whatever reason this whole thing is now set in like the world of the Russian underground, then yes, you’re going to need to change some names. That’s just like a natural thing to have happen. But, otherwise it does feel kind of like a dick move.

Craig: It’s a dick move. That’s exactly right. So, to our fellow professionals, don’t be dicks.

John: Don’t be dicks. The last point I’d like to make in terms of names and name usage is that characters generally have first names and last names, but not all the time.

Craig: Yeah.

John: Sometimes you use the first name, and sometimes you use their last name, and you need to make a choice and be consistent about whether you’re using first, last, or both for those characters, because that can really help you get through — help your script make sense.

And so with your lead character, obviously that character is going to have a first name and a last name. You will make the choice whether it’s their first name that appears above their dialogue or their last name. But be consistent. And whatever name you pick, that should be the name above all their dialogue. It should be the name you use in all the action lines. Don’t go back and forth, because we will get confused.

Craig: Yeah.

John: And be consistent for that character. Now, it doesn’t mean that every character has to be used by their first name, or their last name. That’s a choice you can make for each character about how you’re going to do it. So, you can have one character who is Sam and another character who is McGarnagle, and if you want to use McGarnagle for all McGarnagle stuff, great. But he’s always McGarnagle and he’s never anything else.

Craig: Yeah. And try and match that up to the way people talk to each other. Not that announcing someone’s name before you say something to them is great practice, but let’s say you’re in a movie where you’ve got a psychologist who is joining a SWAT team to try and get a hostage out of a situation. Well, the psychologist may be Gary and he has a wife and kids, and the first 15 pages is setting up Gary and his life. When he encounters this group of SWAT guys, well they all call each other by their last name, so that’s what they are. They’re last name guys. And they’re last name characters. And it’s not like they can only call him Gary.

They can call him Chang. But Gary, it’s how we meet people and generally how the world interacts with them that can help drive that.

John: What you’re describing is often in films — a character’s personal life is in first names and professional life is in last names. That’s the way that the real world often does work.

Craig: Right. Exactly.

John: One last thing that can be helpful sometimes, this is a thing I learned from Big Fish, is using both first and last names at times can be very, very helpful. So, there’s Don Price and Zacky Price in Big Fish. And there’s also Jenny Hill. Those characters are always both names. And it becomes useful for the Price brothers because it helps you remember, oh, they’re brothers. And that’s incredibly useful for that.

Jenny Hill, we always refer to her as her full name, which just helps you remember who she was as you go through the script. And so it’s fine if you want to choose to use both names for certain characters. That’s okay.

Craig: That’s how I refer to Richard Kelly. I will not say Richard.

John: I won’t say Richard and I won’t say Kelly.

Craig: He’s Richard Kelly. He will always be Richard Kelly.

John: Let us go to our third topic today which is when it doesn’t come out right. Now, last night I got to see our friend Kelly Marcel’s film, Saving Mr. Banks.

Craig: Well, that came out right. [laughs]

John: That came out really, really right. But even whilst we were talking at this after party for the AFI premiere, Kelly, Aline, and I were talking about this very thing which is what — she loves the film. And so in no way am I trying to say that she doesn’t love the film.

But we talked about the inevitability that there are things you wrote a certain way that in the process of becoming a movie are not the same way that you tended to write them, even though they could be shot exactly word for word, it’s not going to be the film that you envisioned in your head. And how do you come to terms with the fact that it’s not exactly what you had envisioned in your head.

Craig: Mm-hmm.

John: And so that is the happy situation where like you have a really movie at the end of it, so luxury problems. But, sometimes it’s not what you saw in your head and it’s not good. So, what do you do?

Craig: Well, step one, don’t panic.

John: Yes.

Craig: Best advice from Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. Grab your towel, don’t panic. The thing is that you saw the final cut. Oftentimes as screenwriters we’re seeing an early cut. Well, the early cut is like one of our first drafts, and if people around us didn’t panic, don’t we owe them the same courtesy of not panicking?

True, a screenplay can be changed in vast ways far more easily than one can change the edit of a film. And yet a film can be changed through editing in ways that are vaster than we would suspect.

John: Agreed. And the first time screenwriters see their movies made never understand how much it can progress and change.

Craig: It can progress and change mightily. So, the first thing is, don’t panic.

John: Yeah.

Craig: The second thing is to remember — remember when you wrote your first draft and you gave it to people and then they gave you feedback, and then you see where you end up? It’s quite likely that a lot of the people who read that first draft loathed it and panicked momentarily and then said, “Well hold on, we can fix things. The writer is going to do better than this because this is the necessary first step.” The first step is never the final step, except for the case of Alexander and Karaszewski in Ed Wood apparently. [laughs] They were just touched by god. What can you do?

But you don’t panic now either. It’s the same situation. The director needs to find her way to it. They are now in their first draft and they are not seeing some things that you saw because their experience is different than yours.

Even if your turned out experience here is not about seeing the film, it’s even just hearing your script being read. Let’s say you’re in a writing group and everybody reads the script. And you hear it and you think, “Oh no.” Don’t panic. And then start to really think about where and how there’s a disconnect between the intention and what happened. And while you’re thinking about that, also open your mind to the possibility that perhaps something new has occurred that may also be worthy.

Just because it’s not what you intended doesn’t mean it’s bad. Different isn’t wrong. However, wrong is wrong. [laughs]

John: Yes.

Craig: So, then, my question for you, John, is okay you’ve seen this cut and you know that some things are just wrong. As a professional, with a goal in mind, how do you go about getting it unwrongified and rightified?

John: So, my first experience with this process was seeing the first cut of Go. And we were downstairs in the basement of the Thalberg building on the Columbia lot and we saw it. And I excused myself. I went out to the restrooms down there and had like a full on sweaty panic attack, because it was so awful. I was really thinking like maybe we can just never release it, because I knew it would kill my career if it got out, because it was just unspeakably bad.

And so then I went in and tried to have like the smile on my face conversation about like, well, there are some things that worked. And as I started having that conversation I realized like, you know what, there were some things that worked. And I was there for every frame we shot and I know we shot everything. So, the stuff that’s actually working, we just need to get everything else to work as well as basically the Vegas sequence was working in that first cut.

And it’s like, well, that’s going to be really hard. But, you know what? I can work really, really hard. And so then it was a process of, and this is different on every movie, is figuring out how can you as the writer come in and provide the help that can be provided to this process. So, with Go I was able to actually come into the editing room and sort of sit down and we could just do cut, after cut, after cut and then figure out reshoots and do all that stuff we needed to do.

Other movies, I’ve provided the first and most extensive set of notes that sort of talked through these are things that are working so, so well, these are the things that aren’t working so well, this is what I know we have, this is a thing we could try. And on Tim Burton’s movie that’s as much as I’ve been able to do, but it’s been really helpful for me to be able to do that.

Craig, what do you do after that first cut? And one thing I always stress when a screenwriter is going to see their first assembly of a movie is to tell them it’s supposed to be terrible. You will not believe how bad it can be. We love you. It’s going to be okay.

Craig: Well, sometimes it’s not going to be okay. I mean, let’s just also say that occasionally things go so wrong that it’s just going to be bad. It will be better than it is, but it will be bad. But sometimes it’s the total disasters that turn into these big victories. The ones I’m always worried about are the middling ones where you think, well, it’s a C+. I think we can get it to a B. Whoop-de-do. You know?

Well, first of all, before I do anything I have to justify why I’m there to begin with. This part of the process generally, traditionally is reserved for the director, and the producers, and the studio. Traditionally the screenwriter was seen as like a booster tank had been ejected on launch and was no longer required for the mission.

John: Yes.

Craig: That has changed, and I think changed for the better. And I would urge studios, producers, and directors to open the process up to screenwriters because we can help. And those screenwriters who understand, and I would hope that it’s now approaching 100%, who understand that the mission at this point is to improve the film, not to regain the movie that was in our heads when we wrote it, those screenwriters who can do that can be of great help.

Why? Because if you understand how editing works, and I would ask screenwriters who have not spent time in editing rooms to beg their way into them, even if it’s just to sit there quietly to experience it, we are able to offer solutions.

The director is beset by their own doubt and fears. By a lack of perspective they are exhausted. They are being asked to essentially look at this material as if they were just handed it by someone else. They did it. Their experience of the footage is colored by how hard they fought for certain things, how hard the day was to get, what they felt about a certain actor.

People around them will offer perspective. A lot of times the perspective is a passive perspective. “I don’t like that. I do like this.” And those are all opinions and they’re fine.

What a screenwriter with post-production experience can do is say, “Here’s what I think doesn’t work, and here’s how I think we can fix it. And it’s not hard. We’re going to do this and this, take this out, put this here. Let’s add a line of dialogue off screen over here, just to cover this, and it’s going to feel great. Extend this shot so that I’m looking at him while she’s talking. I want to stay — the idea was that I would be with him, so that what she’s saying isn’t as important as how he’s feeling about her saying it.”

Thing like this, that’s the real stuff of editing. And those are the things that make so much difference. Scott Frank was talking to me about editing his movie — he finished it — called A Walk Among the Tombstones. And I’ve seen it and it’s terrific. And Steven Soderbergh came in and was talking with him about the cut. And one of the things that came out of that discussion was cutting less. Just letting the shots go longer, even if the person who was talking wasn’t onscreen, because it fit the mood and the style of the movie better.

And we can do these things for each other. So, for directors who aren’t accustomed to having screenwriters involved in the process, open yourself up to it. And forgive them if they seem a little clingy to something, because we can get over that quickly, and then help deal with the world that is as opposed to the world that we imagined.

John: Well, the screenwriter can come in often as the fresh set of eyes because a lot of times I’ve not seen everything that was shot. So, I’m genuinely naïve to sort of what was happening on the day. I don’t know all the fights. I don’t know all the backstory behind things.

Craig: Right.

John: But I do remember the intention, and so I do remember what the intention was behind that scene. And there was a reason why it was that way. And there may be a good reason why it should be that way, again, and I can help find the way back to that process.

Craig: That’s right.

John: Also, screenwriters, we tend to be really good at sitting on our butts and staring at screens. And that’s a skill that we’ve developed from writing our scripts and it’s not a skill that’s actually natural to many directors. And so we sometimes have the patience to sit and like try the 15 different versions of how this thing could work and do all that experimentation that many directors can’t, because many directors are up on their feet, pacing, and doing 10,000 things at once.

Many directors sort of thrive on controlling chaos around them. And when it’s actually a quiet, still environment they kind of flip out.

Craig: Mm-hmm.

John: So, that’s often a way that screenwriters can be very helpful in the process is looking at what was there and what’s possible.

We’re also sometimes less afraid, well, we’re able to in our heads think about what happens to the story if things move around. And so if we move this scene from here up four scenes earlier to here, we can do the narrative math and ripple through what all that effects. That is very hard for other people to do, just because we’re used to the story as a whole. We know how it all fits together.

We know the consequences but also the opportunities and the possibilities that are there.

Craig: That’s exactly right. And so sometimes the non-writers will offer solutions that are great for the thing in front of you, they just don’t understand what it means for something 40 minutes later. Whereas writers always understand that. We immediately understand that, and so we provide a comprehensive solution, not something that’s going to cause its own problem.

The only other advice I could suggest is to be gentle and nice. Be nice. It’s so hard and it’s hard to get criticism and it’s hard to be told that you did something wrong, or you screwed it up. And I think that everybody is afraid on some level, afraid of the screenwriter. They don’t like it, but I think they are.

John: Yeah.

Craig: They’re afraid of blowing it because this person did this whole thing. And I think that’s part of what’s behind a lot of the bravado, like that crazy Morgan Freeman thing.

John: Yeah.

Craig: But be nice, be gentle, and also recognize that you have a legitimacy in your comments that no one else has. When some producer tells a director, “This scene is not working, cut it,” the director thinks, “Screw you, suit.”

When the writer who wrote that scene says it, you got to think twice. [laughs] And I have no problem saying, “Listen, it’s just not working. You know what? I obviously thought it would work. It’s not working. It’s not because you screwed up. It’s because we made a mistake. WE.”

John: We.

Craig: “So let’s WE cut it.”

John: Exactly.

Craig: Yeah.

John: And let’s WE finish up this episode of Scriptnotes. So, I have a One Cool Thing. Craig, do you have a One Cool Thing this week?

Craig: I do.

John: I wonder if ours is going to be the same thing. Mine is this utility that was introduced this week which I thought was crazy and impossible and useful for a very specific thing that happens with me. I’ve been traveling so much and I’ve been working primarily on my MacBook Air, which I love, it’s a great little 13-inch computer and I love it to death.

And I’ve been in public places a lot, so I always keep it locked. And so when the screen goes dark I have to type the password to unlock and I have a long password because I want to protect what’s there. So, it’s a new utility called Knock to Unlock which is crazy, but it actually works.

So, it’s a Mac application that runs in the background. And it’s an iPhone application that also runs in the background. It uses low power Bluetooth to talk between the phone and the computer. So, basically you walk up to your computer, you knock on your phone twice, and it unlocks it.

Craig: Whoa! I’m totally getting that.

John: Yeah. So, it seems impossible. So, you have to have a pretty recent model MacBook Air.

Craig: Well, what about like a MacBook Pro?

John: I’m sure that will be great. So, like my main computer that I’m working off of right now is an older MacBook that doesn’t let me do it, but my MacBook Air, it works great. So, it needs low power Bluetooth and it’s actually proved genuinely useful. So, it’s a utility that seems like magic and I’m only a couple days into it, but so far I really enjoy it.

Craig: Wow. Knock to Unlock. I’m totally getting that. That sounds great. That is, in fact, a cool thing. So, my One Cool Thing this week, obviously not that because that took me by surprise, blew my socks off.

Somebody posted, you know, we get a lot of these things on Twitter now where people say, “Please Retweet this and please Retweet that.” And we can’t Retweet everything. And, frankly, I’m just not a big Retweeter.

John: Yeah.

Craig: But one guy sent me this thing and it was basically about organ donation and a kid who needed an organ. And I don’t know, have I spoken about organ donation before on the podcast? I’m always worried that I’m re-cooling things.

John: I don’t think you have.

Craig: I have always been an enormous proponent of organ donation and also registering for the bone marrow transplant registry, the national marrow donor registry. In my mind, this is frankly a prerequisite for being a good human being. I hate to be super judgmental about this, but I really am. This is one of the few areas in my life where I’m sanctimonious in the truest sense of sanctimony.

John: Well, that and vaccines, but yes.

Craig: Yes. And vaccines. Correct. [laughs] It tends to revolve around medical science. But I think you are essentially you are —

John: We are lock-step in agreement on this one.

Craig: Yes. You are a bad person if you are so greedy and stupid as to think it’s more important to hold onto your organs in death than to save someone else’s life. Nobody likes to think about dying too soon, but then again nobody likes to think about dying pointlessly because they can’t find a heart for you, or for your child.

And so everybody should be an organ donor. Everybody should have the thing on their license that says they’re an organ donor. And I also think everybody should register for the national bone marrow registry service. It’s very, very simple to do.

The idea behind that is people, with a blood cancer, typically like a leukemia, will need to have their marrow replaced, but marrow will be rejected by the body unless it’s a very specific match to your own natural tissue. And it’s very hard to find a match. Sometimes your relatives will not match you. Sometimes somebody else across the world will.

So, what they do is they send you a kit. You can go online and register and we’ll provide the links. And you just do a cheek swab and send it back. And from that cheek swab they now have you in the database. And when somebody needs a bone marrow transplant and there’s not an obvious answer for that, they type them and they do into their database.

And one day my number may come up and I may have to go do this. And it will hurt a little bit. Whoop-de-doo, it will be the best thing I’ve ever done in my life. So, I love knowing that — are you registered?

John: I’m not bone marrow, so I should do that.

Craig: Oh, you’re going to be, after today, absolutely.

John: I’m doing it.

Craig: It is crucial. But it is just as crucial to be willing to donate every single part of your body that is usable should you die and should it be valuable to someone. Please, everything. Let us just reclaim each other. It is an absolute good thing to do.

So, we’ll provide some links for that, but that is my One Human Thing this week.

John: Very good. So, the links we were talking about are with the show notes. So, if you’re listening to this on your iPhone, those links are probably there in the podcast with you right there at the moment. But if not, you can go to johnaugust.com/podcast and find this podcast. There you will find links for most of the things we talked about: Knock to Unlock; the organ donation registries, the California one but also the national clearinghouse for that; the bone marrow registry — we’ll put that in there as well.

We will have information about our live show in December when we know when it is. So, a good idea in general is to follow us on Twitter. I am @johnaugust. Craig is @clmazin. Those would be the places where we would first announce when tickets are going to be coming out and sort of what’s going to be going on with the live show.

If you are listening to this on a device that connects to iTunes, you can subscribe to us there. That’s awesome. If for some reason you are getting two subscription showing up in your feed, it’s because we had to change the URL address for Scriptnotes about three weeks ago, so subscribe to the new one and then delete the old one and then you won’t get two episodes coming in.

But while you’re in iTunes, leave us a comment, because we love those, and we do read those sometimes. And sometimes we’ll read them aloud. So, leave us a comment, that’s great.

Craig: Yeah.

John: And that is our show.

Craig: I think I did all right.

John: I think you did really, really well, Craig. A round of applause for Craig Mazin.

Craig: Ah…thank you.

John: Some nicely picked topics there.

Craig: Thank you.

John: And, Craig, we will talk again next week.

Craig: Great see you next time. Bye.

John: Thanks.

Links:

  • Order your Scriptnotes shirts from The John August Store before Friday
  • Get your tickets now for the Big Fish talkback on November 23rd and let us know you’ll be there
  • Previous One Cool Thing WinesTilSoldOut did a cool thing for Craig
  • John’s 2010 Jessica Alba blog post
  • Dolby’s Atmos is one example of why your home theater sound doesn’t compare to the movie theater experience
  • Foley on Wikipedia
  • Behind the Name breaks down first name popularity by country and year
  • Saving Mr. Banks is in theaters this December
  • Knock to Unlock lets you unlock your Mac by knocking your iPhone
  • Register as an organ donor today
  • And register for the Be The Match bone marrow database, too
  • Outro by Scriptnotes listener Jonas Bech

Scriptnotes, Ep 116: Damsels in distress — Transcript

November 9, 2013 Scriptnotes Transcript

The original post for this episode can be found [here](http://johnaugust.com/2013/damsels-in-distress).

**John August:** Hello and welcome. My name is John August.

**Craig Mazin:** My name is Craig Mazin.

**John:** And this is Episode 116, the damsels in distress episode of Scriptnotes, a podcast about screenwriting and things that are interesting to screenwriters. How are you, Craig?

**Craig:** I’m okay.

**John:** Oh, just okay? What’s going on?

**Craig:** You know what, we were in Austin, and we had a great time. It was exhausting and, yeah, I’m fine. You know, the weekend, these weekends are intense. And this one for whatever reason — Ooh, did you hear that?

**John:** I did.

**Craig:** It was like a truck…

**John:** So now we know we’re back in our environment.

**Craig:** Yeah. We’re clearly back. Anyway, yeah, so anyway I’m just a little, I’m fine.

**John:** Austin was intense.

**Craig:** It was.

**John:** And it was intense for a lot of reasons. First of all, I got to hang out with people I really liked, and that was really fun. I got to drink on weekdays, which is not a usual thing for me. Also, we’ve talked about this phenomenon, within a two-block radius of the Driskill Hotel during the Austin Film Festival, I’m kind of famous. I’m like recognizably famous, which is not my daily life at all. And so I had a sudden sympathy for actual famous people who can never escape that. Whereas I can walk an extra two blocks and then no one in Austin knew who I was.

**Craig:** Yeah, and you know, you’ve probably had a little more practice with that sort of thing because you’ve been doing the IMDb thing for a long time. And your website. When I first started going to Austin, nobody knew who I was. And then if they knew who I was, they just didn’t care. It is true that the podcast has… — Well, first of all, people would come up to me and they would be emotional. And then I would get emotional. And also there’s this strange thing that happens when you are walking through a room and as you’re walking by people you can hear one of them whispering your name to another person.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** And this is not humble bragging. It’s actually very — it’s not something you want. It’s actually distressing. I’m not saying to people don’t, I mean, of course, it was wonderful talking to people, and I loved every minute of that. And it really is incredible to meet all the people that listen to us. But, you know, I’m not, [laughs], anyway, look, I’m a big mess anyway this week. So, I’m a big mess. But, that was — it was emotional. And it was weird at times and intense.

And, you know what, wouldn’t trade it for the world. Wouldn’t trade it for the world. No regret.

**John:** It was a great, great time.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** Today on the show we’re going to talk about a bunch of things including this article you just sent me from T-Bone Burnet who was at the Austin Film Festival, who I actually met at the Austin Film Festival. Did you meet him there?

**Craig:** I have met T-Bone in Nashville actually.

**John:** Very nice. So, he was there with Callie Khouri, his wife, who is also the creator of Nashville, so he was there. And he wrote this thing that you wanted to talk about, so we’ll talk about that.

**Craig:** Yup.

**John:** I want to talk about damsels in distress, and that meme and that trope and sort of what we can do about that.

We have a bunch of reader questions — listener questions. A question about synonyms. A question about breaking the back of a script. We have a question about speccing a pilot. The end of the second act. And that uncomfortable middle in a screenwriting career. So, we have a big show day. A lot on our plate and our agenda, so we should probably get started.

**Craig:** Yeah, I’m going to get my head straight, man. Let’s do this.

**John:** Let’s do this.

So, small bits of housekeeping. First off, t-shirts. We saw so many t-shirts in Austin, which was great, the Scriptnotes t-shirts in blue and in orange.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** Well, the big news is that starting today we are selling another batch of t-shirts. They’re black and they look really, really good. Just like the last time, we are going to do two weeks of preorders, and that’s it. We basically take the preorders, we count up how many shirts we have to make in each size, and we just make those shirts. And so that way we don’t have to stock shirts. We don’t have to do this all the time. It’s sort of a once or twice a year thing we’re going to do.

So, starting today, we are taking orders. We are closing orders on Friday, November 15. We will start shipping these t-shirts out on December 2. So, if you are interested in buying a Scriptnotes t-shirt, they’re at store.johnaugust.com. And they’re available starting today.

**Craig:** Uh, can I get one?

**John:** You can get one. You’re guaranteed. As a host of a show, you’re guaranteed exactly one t-shirt.

**Craig:** Oh, this is why I do this show.

**John:** Yeah, for the t-shirts.

**Craig:** Yeah!

**John:** Just like going to the Austin Film Festival for like the little goodie bag, which has like the most impractical things to have.

**Craig:** They didn’t even give me one. What was in it?

**John:** So, there’s like a Stella Artois glass.

**Craig:** Okay.

**John:** Like a small, miniature version, so it wouldn’t even enough to hold like a whole Stella Artois, but there’s a glass for it. Which is like, we all traveled here, so we’re going to have to pack this? No, so of course that just got left in the hotel room.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** Although other years they’ve had like Tito’s Vodka, which is lovely, but you can’t take that on a plane, either.

**Craig:** No.

**John:** The gift bags, I understand why they exist. You’re trying to reward your sponsors. You’re trying to do nice things for your panelists. But they’re frustrating at times.

**Craig:** Yeah. I think given the nature of what’s going on over there, just some aspirin. Some aspirin. [laughs] Some Tylenol. Xanax.

**John:** All of these would be really good, helpful things.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** Yeah. So, t-shirts. On sale now. If you want a t-shirt, go to store.johnaugust.com.

Next up, I’m going back to New York for Big Fish on Saturday November 23. I’m doing at talk back after the matinee show. And so a talk back is basically you bought a ticket, you came to see the show. After the show you have a chance to talk with the creators, the actors, various people involved in the show.

We will answer your questions. We will talk about the things that you just saw. Those are a fun thing to do that I love about Broadway shows. And so we try to do a talk back every week. Saturday, November 23 will be my talk back. And so if you are interested in coming to that show, get yourself a ticket. Use the SCRIPT discount code by all means. But then email ask@johnaugust.com to let me know that you’re planning on coming.

Space is going to be limited. I think we can only take 60 people. So, if that fills up, we may be emailing back saying sorry, or we’ll do something to change the venue or make it work.

**Craig:** Exciting. I wish I could be there for that.

**John:** The last bit of housekeeping is a lot of people have asked how you and I record the show. And so obviously in Austin we were together in a room, but that’s the exception rather than the rule.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** Most times we’re doing what we’re doing right now, we’re talking on Skype. So, there’s a post up on johnaugust.com right now to explain how we actually do the show, including our microphones, and our headphones, and what Stuart does, and how it all fits together.

**Craig:** Oh, I can’t wait to find out what Stuart does. This is exciting.

**John:** Yeah. So, Stuart, the magical elf, stitches our audio together. It works, and we’re happy to share our way of doing things, which is not the only way to do things, but it’s the way we do our podcast.

**Craig:** It is our way.

**John:** It is our way.

So, let’s get to our new business which is let’s start with the thing you emailed me today which is this Hollywood Reporter article about T-Bone Burnet.

**Craig:** Right. And, you know, so, this was something that Glen Mazzara of Walking Dead fame — among other things — put on Facebook. And it was about music and the music business. But Glen always posts interesting articles. I tend to read the stuff that he curates. And also I met T-Bone. He’s a really cool guy. I mean, honestly, first of all his name is T-Bone, right? And then he’s married to Callie and he’s awesome. So, I thought, okay, I’ll check this out.

I was so pleasantly surprised to find this umbrage screed in it that spoke to my inner angry, angry man. And taught me something about the attitude of Silicon Valley toward content that I didn’t realize. He had such a good insight. So, basically, I don’t have to read the whole thing. I’m going to summarize.

Basically what he says is, look, there was this cultural thing of what happened in Northern California. Northern California, those guys up there were, what do you call, the Grateful Dead, right? They love the Grateful Dead. The culture of Northern California is very Grateful Dead of the seventies. And the Grateful Dead as a band was all about live performance, improvisation, and bootlegging. They were never about one version.

No one cares about the one album version of a Grateful Dead song. The whole point of the Grateful Dead is that they didn’t care either. They were high out of their minds and it was entirely about the experience of the moment, and freedom, and just sharing stuff. And as he points out, the actual business that is connected to the Grateful Dead is “a complete travesty now.”

And then on the other side, you had Metallica which is a decidedly not hippie dippy Northern California band. And Metallica very famously took a stand against Napster and really said, “Look, we control the music we make and we make definitive versions. Obviously we tour and we make live albums, but this is the version that we are putting out there that we own and we frankly don’t want to be circulated around for free because we care for it and it matters to us.”

And his point is that the attitude of, “Oh, la, da, da, music, it’s free!” permeated Silicon Valley in a way that eventually led to the great reduction of the music industry through technology. That there’s a philosophical undercurrent to Silicon Valley, that content should be free. And interestingly, as he points out, these people who promote this technology and say, “Look, we just basically want to spread content around for free,” they also, while they’re doing that, are you making you pay for the conduits through which they spread it.

That there is an underlying hypocrisy to the whole thing, and as he points out, if we talked about tearing down the car industry in the way that we tore down the music industry, people would go nuts. He says, “People in Hollywood, we should go up there with pitchforks and torches to Silicon Valley now. Unfortunately that’s how sophisticated our response would be — pitchforks and torches.”

What a great, great essay.

**John:** So, what I find compelling about this last part about the car industry versus the music industry, or you can carry that through to the Hollywood filmmaking industry, is I think we have this mental model of what it is like to be working at a car plant. We have like what a worker there does. But we don’t have a mental model of what a grip does, what a gaffer does, what these people do, and sort of what the middle class life is like to make movies, or in this case what the middle class life is to be the artist behind things, the screenwriter, director, the creative producer behind a project. So, since we don’t have a model of what it’s like to lose those jobs, because they’re not going to one place, and there’s not a factory closing down, you can’t see that loss the same way.

But, just like in the music industry, there’s a middle class of film people that are sort of disappearing. TV has taken up some of that slack. God bless television.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** But it has been a real factor.

**Craig:** No question. No question.

**John:** One of the things I also found interesting with his point, this was his quote: “And what’s happened in reality is the power has been consolidated into very, very few companies, and the middle class musician has just been wiped out.” And this con, as he describes it, is that we talk about this sort of freedom and liberation and anyone can get to music and its democratizing things, but the same companies that were sort of fighting to shoot down Napster and file sharing and sort of all the ways that music became free, they paradoxically became more powerful, because they’re the last people standing.

**Craig:** Yes!

**John:** So, all of the middle group of businesses that couldn’t withstand that onslaught disappeared. And that’s how a lot of people made their living was through those kind of things. And so you can say, “Tough. You got to tour more. You got to do other things.” That’s not true if you’re with the people who are making those albums, and if your life was responsible for making those albums, you’re life has gone away.

**Craig:** Right. And the apparatus they use to support the tours is gone. He says the internet has been an “honest to god con.” And I really want people to think about this, because T-Bone is exactly right. They have fed us the opposite of what they have done. They have appealed to the artistic spirit of freedom. They have appealed to the artistic spirit of freedom. They have appealed to the artistic spirit of wanting to share what you create. And in doing so, they have devalued it and taken all of the money out of it. Or a lot of it.

They’ve done it in music. They want to do it in movies for sure. And I think that, frankly, the only thing that saved us in movies other than the slightly longer path towards quick downloads of movies has been that the movie industry saw what happened to the music industry and they were the canary in the coal mine and they’ve tried everything. And they are trying everything to avoid this.

But when you hear that Google and Amazon want information to be free, what you’re actually hearing is that they want to make all of the money off of your work, and you get none. And I’ve noticed that one of the weaknesses of our union is that in their hatred of our direct employers, they often look to the wrong places for salvation. And our — I sense the Writers Guild constantly looking at Google and Amazon, like they’ll come save us.

Oh, no. Oh, no, no, no, no. Oh, they will bury us. They will bury us. They want to bury us. Of course they do.

Oh god, that felt good.

**John:** [sighs] A sobering bit of umbrage to get us started here.

**Craig:** Mm-hmm. Thank you, T-Bone. That was great.

**John:** We don’t have to provide answers, we just have to point out problems.

**Craig:** [laughs] And make ourselves feel better momentarily.

**John:** So, for our next topic, I think we can provide if not answers at least some context for better ways that writers can involve themselves in helping the situations. This is damseling, the idea of damsels in distress, which is not only what’s still in film, or sort of a classic trope. It’s a thing that you see not just in movies or television shows, but also in video games. And the best way I sort of got introduced to this idea and sort of the pervasiveness of this idea is this great three-part series that Anita Sarkeesian did called Tropes versus Women in Videogames.

And so videogames, because they tend to be so linear, the goal is often to save the princess. And so in save the princess you have Donkey Kong, you have Mario trying to save Princess Peach. We all get that. We sort of know what that is.

And on some level we know like, oh, god, women characters don’t do very well in videogames because they are just something to be saved. They are the goal. Either you have to rescue the princess or you have to avenge the death of your wife, or some girl who has been killed.

**Craig:** Yes.

**John:** And that’s a classic trope in those thing. And even as videogames have become more technically and narratively complex, the underlying story behind the women characters tends not to be more complex.

You can even point to this new Grand Theft Auto. There are female characters, but they’re not…

**Craig:** Barely. Barely.

**John:** Yeah, there’s not playable in the ways that other things can be played.

**Craig:** No. Well, let’s extend back a little bit. Damseling is something that has gone on forever. Videogames are obsessed with it in the way that super hero movies are obsessed with it. Even when super hero movies attempt to make female super heroes, they seem to end up in a damseling situation. And that’s not surprising in a sense. There is a certain kind of very male story that appeals to a very male fantasy to essentially be the all powerful man who rescues and provides for a woman who needs rescuing and providing for. That fits into the heterosexual, hetero-normal male perception, particularly for adolescent males and males with Aspergers. It seems like it gets right in there.

And I get it. I get that.

**John:** But we constantly reinforce this idea. So, you can say like it’s a primal innate idea. Great. But there’s lot of ideas that are primal and innate and we are able to sometimes acknowledge them, lampshade them, and move on.

So, one of the first articles I found when I searched for “damsels in distress” was this complex.com article about the 15 hottest damsels in distress in movies.

**Craig:** [laughs]

**John:** I thought it was exactly perfect. So, I want to read you…

**Craig:** It’s stupid.

**John:** It does two things at once. So, Rachel Nichols in Conan the Barbarian.

**Craig:** Sure.

**John:** Sure. Live Tyler in The Incredible Hulk.

**Craig:** Hot always.

**John:** Yeah, I forget. Is she supposed to be the scientist, or is she just like the scientist’s daughter?

**Craig:** I believe she is the general’s daughter.

**John:** The general’s daughter.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** Michelle Monaghan in Mission: Impossible 3.

**Craig:** Okay, yeah.

**John:** Maggie Grace in Taken.

**Craig:** Sure.

**John:** She’s literally, she’s the MacGuffin. She is the thing that is taken.

**Craig:** Right. She basically is the briefcase from Pulp Fiction. [laughs]

**John:** Yes. Kirsten Dunst in Spider-Man.

**Craig:** Well, of course.

**John:** Pretty much any girl in a super hero movie tends to become a damsel in distress.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** This is debatable. Carrie Fisher as Princess Leia.

**Craig:** Eh, I mean, you know, she’s tough. She comes out fighting and she is in distress because she’s a princess and they’ve captured her. But they rescue her in the middle.

**John:** They do rescue her in the middle. And also you sense that the classic image you see is like her in chains next to Jabba the Hutt, but it’s a setup. And so when you realize that this is all part of a plan kind of.

**Craig:** Right, I mean, but look: here’s the truth. For instance in Empire, she comes back real tough to save Han Solo and immediately gets all kissy face and then gets chained up in a bikini. It’s damseling.

**John:** It’s damseling.

**Craig:** It’s damsel.

**John:** You have a competent woman who is then reduced to being an object for the men to rescue.

**Craig:** To rescue and save. Exactly.

**John:** Blake Lively is classically the damsel in Savages, a movie that I talked about at Austin because I actually kind of really dig Savages for the weird things it did, but she is just the thing you have to rescue.

**Craig:** Yeah. I didn’t see it, so, but I’ll take your word for it.

**John:** Robin Wright as the princess in The Princess Bride.

**Craig:** Wonderful movie. Great character.

**John:** Wonderful movie.

**Craig:** I don’t believe she makes a choice in the film.

**John:** Nope. Keira Knightley in Pirates of the Caribbean.

**Craig:** Um…

**John:** Now, in later films they tried to sort of swashbuckler her more.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** But she ultimately is the pretty thing you have to save.

**Craig:** She is beautiful. And one of the characters has to save her. I actually disagree with this one to some extent. I think that this one was an interesting — an interesting post-modern take on the damsel.

**John:** Naomi Watts in King Kong.

**Craig:** Well, sure.

**John:** The girl in King Kong is the damsel. Yes. Cameron Diaz in The Mask. And I had to think back to The Mask, but my recollection of it was it was a character who seemed to have her own thing and then just becomes a plot device.

**Craig:** She was a chanteuse.

**John:** She was a chanteuse.

**Craig:** And then she got damselled.

**John:** Jessica Alba in Machete. I never saw Machete.

**Craig:** It’s accurate.

**John:** Yes. Rosie Huntington-Whiteley in Transformers: Dark of the Moon. The fact that I have no idea who she is and that she’s really pretty and she’s in a Michael Bay movie are signs that she’s probably going to be a damsel in distress.

**Craig:** I mean, honestly, I don’t even know how the guy that made the list picked these 15, because there’s 15 damsels in distress every week.

**John:** These are the hottest ones, though.

**Craig:** Oh, these are the hottest ones. Oh, I see. Oh.

**John:** And, I have to give him props for Ursula Andress as Dr. Honey Ryder — as Honey Ryder in Dr. No.

**Craig:** Yeah. She was not a doctor.

**John:** She was not a doctor. Although, Dr. Christmas Snow from one of the Bond movies.

**Craig:** Christmas Jones.

**John:** Christmas Jones. You’re absolutely right.

**Craig:** Yes, you know me. I’m a Bond scientist.

**John:** Christmas Snow is actually Chrissy Snow from Three’s Company. Her name is Chrissy Snow.

**Craig:** Oh, really?

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** I did not know that.

**John:** I actually have quite a bit of knowledge of Three’s Company. It’s very deeply ingrained in my soul.

**Craig:** [hums Threes Company theme]

**John:** You can knock on my door any time.

**Craig:** Here’s the thing. Well, first of all, I don’t know how familiar you are with Anita Sarkeesian, but she was sort of involved in this very disturbing episode in videogame culture, where she really is as far as I can tell the only person that is very verbal about feminist concerns. I don’t know how else you can point and say — I mean, you can call them humanist concerns about the way videogames portray women, and the vitriol that was piled on her was horrifying. And, obviously, confirmed everything she said and then some. She’s very smart.

And I want her to be listened to. I play videogames. I like videogames. I don’t mind saving the damsel every now and again, but videogames are trailing so far behind movies and film, which are all also damseling, so that’s how bad videogames are. They’re infantile. Their portrayal of women is infantile to the point where it’s how much bigger can the boobs get. It’s just stupid. It’s stupid!

**John:** I was looking through the TV Tropes article on Damsels in Distress. So, if you ever have a question about themes in movies, TV Tropes is a great place to go to. So, these are some of the themes that TV Tropes pointed out about Damsels in Distress. And then you hear them you think like, oh yeah, I get what that is.

Chained to a rock.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** It’s a Prometheus classic.

The Girl in the Tower. So, she’s isolated up there and you have to go save her in this tower.

Hypnotize the Princess, basically the bad guy has not only taken the princess, but has corrupted the princess so that the princess is going to do his will, sometimes even after you rescue her she’s dangerous.

**Craig:** Jafar.

**John:** Jafar.

The Living MacGuffin.

**Craig:** [laughs]

**John:** MacGuffin classically is that plot device the hero is going after, but it doesn’t even really matter what they’re going after. It’s just the reason why the plot is there.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** I have your wife.

The president’s daughter, which if you really stop and think about it, like oh god, how often does the president’s daughter become a thing?

**Craig:** I mean, it just gets…

**John:** And the best topic for me I think is Faux Action Girl, which they define as it sort of seems like she’s a badass action chick, and everyone sort of treats her like that, but if you actually look at what she does in the movie, she’s not an action chick at all. She’s sort of dressed like an action chick, but she actually is kind of useless and doesn’t do anything for herself.

**Craig:** I think someone saw The Avengers, huh?

**John:** Uh-huh.

**Craig:** I mean, look, I can’t say that it’s wrong to tell a very simple traditional narrative where you’re saving a princess in a castle. There’s something almost sweet about it. I mean, you guys did it with your videogame. With Karateka.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** But where it gets sick, I think, is when it’s not a choice. When it’s just — there are these things that happen called sub-choices, where you never get to the area of choice. You don’t make a — you know what, we’re going to do a traditional simple sweet story where Mario finds the Princess in a castle. It doesn’t even occur to you that there would be another thing to do.

And this is an area where I actually am very proud of my particular genre, because I think comedies have often been ahead of the curve on this one. Not to say that female driven comedies haven’t really exploded in the last four or five years, because they have. Even in romantic comedies, where women are the protagonists.

So, let’s go all the way back to a super, super down the middle romantic comedy like While You Were Sleeping. She is not a damsel in distress in that movie.

**John:** No. She is driving the story.

**Craig:** She’s driving the story. And, to me, comedies — so, that’s why, when I look at damsel in distress movies, I kind of shrug and I just think, really, that’s, I mean, I don’t know. There’s just so much more…

**John:** They’re not the things you’re writing, but even sometimes if the girl is the central character, she ends up being in damsel. So, you look at Dorothy in The Wizard of Oz. She ultimately gets trapped there with the witch and it’s not until everyone else shows up that she’s able to do anything. It’s sort of like dumb luck that she throws the bucket of water.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** But she gets trapped there.

Bella in Twilight. She’s theoretically the lead character in Twilight, but she’s just there to be rescued most of the time.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** We talked about Indiana Jones and what a great character Marion is, except this incredibly competent woman ultimately becomes a captive.

**Craig:** Right. And by the way, the screenplay I’m writing right now has a very competent woman who ends up captive. [laughs] And I think possibly chained to a rock. And you know what? I made that choice because the truth is the male character, who is the lead of the movie, must save her. But that’s what I needed.

**John:** So, I’m actually writing something at the same time too which in outline form one of the main guys needs to save his girlfriend, or believes he needs to save his girlfriend. And I looked at it again and I looked at it from the perspective of damsel and it’s like, oh, god, I’m trying to find a way to not do that, because…

**Craig:** Yeah, but you do it.

**John:** …it’s simple and simple is lovely, but it may not be the right choice.

**Craig:** Well, listen, then the point is we’re making the choice. And I guess that’s what I would say to people out there. I’m not here to tell you that you can’t write a damsel story anymore, because damsels don’t — women that I know aren’t damsels, but men aren’t heroes either. Okay? And, by the way, women aren’t heroes. Nobody is a hero or a damsel.

In Identity Thief, it’s clear who the damsel in distress is for the entire movie and it’s Jason Bateman. And basically Melissa is torturing the man. But at no point is she, I mean, there’s a point where they get thrown into the back of a cop car and she’s the one rescuing them.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** But that was a choice for that, and this needs the other way. But make the choice.

**John:** Make the choice. And sometimes there are, I want to point out a few movies that have made the choice and sort of found ways to address the damseling that could be useful if you’re facing that situation yourself.

Pepper Potts in the first Iron Man. So, she is the girl in the film, and there’s the expectation like, oh, she’s going to be in danger, she’s going to be at risk. But she’s never actually damselled. She’s trying to do something and she ends up getting shot rather than being held as a captive. And she was being a hero. And she’s being a hero through that situation, so she’s an integral part of the story, but she’s not the object of what he needs to save.

**Craig:** Yeah, I mean, I can’t say that not capturing the damsel, but shooting the secretary instead is necessary a huge step forward for female kind, but…

**John:** Absolutely. I bring it up because she is not the primary focus of these people going after each other. And she’s not being used as bait or as a chick at the end it, which I think is at least useful. So, a female hero being shot is not the worst thing to happen.

**Craig:** [laughs] — Says John August in service to advancing the cause of feminism. Go ahead and just shoot them.

**John:** Shoot them. So, Daphne in Scooby Doo. And so I had the pleasure of being involved in Scooby Doo. One of the things I enjoy about Scooby Doo is that Daphne, that character, she is always being held hostage, she’s always getting tied up, and she’s always in trouble. And so in James Gunn’s version of it, he hangs a lantern on it and he says that character, like they bring up the fact that she always gets held captive and she actually now will train herself and so she’s a stronger, tougher fighter because of that.

So, that’s a choice sometimes, too, is to acknowledge the fact that this is expectation of what’s going to happen to her, and hang a lantern on it, and then subvert the expectation.

**Craig:** Mm-hmm.

**John:** And so everyone will approach every movie with a set of expectations. They will approach the expectation in an action movie that this girl could become captive, so address it, and subvert it if that works in your story.

**Craig:** If that, yeah.

**John:** Shrek does the same thing. Where you see she’s a beautiful princess, she’s going to be in trouble. No, she’s going to call that idea out and say, “Nope, that’s not going to happen to me.”

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** Finally, Sansa in Game of Thrones. And TV is a little bit different because it goes on for so long, but without any spoilers, Sansa, even as we leave this current batch of the series, she is sort of the Princess in the Tower. She’s stuck there and yet while in a general sense there’s a quest to try to get her out of her situation, she’s doing other stuff herself. And so she’s not the sole goal of male characters going to try to save her.

And so she’s part of a very elaborate web of intrigue and decisions and plots, but it’s not just about her being a princess.

**Craig:** Well that’s an interesting concept for me at least. I like the idea that you can present a damsel in distress. And I do think of the character of Sansa as a damsel in distress. And then watch her evolve naturally as a character out of it. Even in movies you can do this.

So, like everybody, I worship The Godfather, and The Godfather Part II. And even though The Godfather Part III has parts that don’t match, obviously, to the quality of the first two, there is one thing about it that I think is extraordinary, and that’s the evolution of Connie.

Because in the first movie she is truly a damsel in distress. She’s being beaten by her husband, and Sonny goes and rescues her. I mean, she gets beaten up by her husband. And in the second movie she is a mess and she blames Michael for ruining her life. And she’s just a heap.

In the third movie she becomes this dragon woman, this amazing force who is holding the family together. Is the spine in Michael’s back. And who is the one that essentially creates the continuity of the line so that the Corleones will forever reign. And that is an amazing thing to watch.

I love that about the third Godfather movie. And I don’t know where the Game of Thrones will take us, because I haven’t read the books ahead. I don’t want to. I like watching them on the show now. But I hope that Sansa evolves. It’s fun.

**John:** Absolutely. So, none of this should be taken as a plea to sort of keep female characters out of danger. Danger is good. Danger is great. The issue comes when you take a character who is in danger just to propel the plot along, especially if you are taking a woman who is previously portrayed as being competent and deliberately making her incompetent at some moment in the third act, or kidnapping her in some moment of the third act so that the male character can go rescue her.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** It’s just such a trope and I think it diminishes what stories can do and I think it sends a really weird message for people watching movies that this is how life should be. And that no matter how competent you are as a woman, eventually you’re going to have to have a man come rescue you.

**Craig:** Right. And I would also ask/suggest that in the spirit of changing language to change the way we think or approach things, that we stop referring to grown women in movies as girls.

**John:** Yes.

**Craig:** It’s just lame. And I occasionally have to catch myself, because it’s common parlance, you know, “He meets the girl.”

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Oh who’s going to be the girl in the movie, you know, it just — but it’s like why is that the one thing we’ve kept from 1930s Hollywood lingo?

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** You know? Because while we’ll say “boy meets girl,” he plays a guy, we’ll say that, “a guy.” So, this man, but she’s the girl. She’s always the girl. So, I say maybe adults deserve woman at this point.

**John:** I agree.

Let’s go to our first question. This first one comes from Joe in Brooklyn, New York.

**Craig:** Hey, Joe, what’s up?

**John:** “I had a question about credits. If a writer gets a script made into a film, but is unhappy with the final product, can he get his name removed from it? Directors have the Alan Smithee pseudonym to follow back. Do writers have something similar?”

**Craig:** Yeah, we do. If the movie is not a Writers Guild covered film, then I think frankly it’s a matter of your individual contract, and if it’s not mentioned in the contract than you’d have to negotiate for a pseudonym. Your right of attribution, that’s a moral right, a Droit Moral, that we don’t have here in the United States. And overseas it’s entirely up to you. Here in the United States where we have work for hire, the Writers Guild and the contract that we have with the companies states that under movies that are created through Writers Guild contracts, we are allowed to use pseudonyms unless I believe we’re paid more than $250,000. It’s somewhere between $200,000 and $250,000.

At that point if they paid us that much, we don’t have the inalienable right to take our name off the movie. Their argument being you must be somebody that was worth something to us. Now we have the right to say no to your request to take your name off the movie. Let’s say we really want to say that John August wrote this movie, or “From the writer of the movie Go,” or whatever they want to promote, they’re not going to just let you on your own decide to take your name off.

You have to ask. In all cases, the pseudonym that you use needs to be registered with the Writers Guild so that it doesn’t duplicate the actual name of another person or the pseudonym that has been used by another person.

We don’t use Alan Smithee. Alan Smithee — it’s remarkable to me that frankly the Directors Guild allows that to perpetuate. I actually think it makes them look terrible.

**John:** Yeah. It’s petulant to me.

**Craig:** It’s petulant and it also is obvious. There are some very famous pseudonyms, Cordwainer Bird I think is the one that Harlan Ellison has used before that people in the know understand mean a certain person, which to me it sort of defeats the purpose of a pseudonym. It’s not longer pseudo.

Alan Smithee defeats the purpose of a pseudonym. For writers, we get to choose our own, and I know writers that have chosen to use pseudonyms. Easier to just not see credit, although if you use a pseudonym you will get the associated residuals and production bonuses and so forth.

**John:** Yeah, which can be very useful.

**Craig:** Yup.

**John:** So, this $250,000 cap, I always take that to mean that at a certain threshold the studio believes that your publicity value is actually useful, and so therefore they want the ability to promote that. And I have seen movies where I don’t think they necessarily care about the writer’s name, but they’d love to be able to say, “From the writer of…something.”

**Craig:** That’s exactly right.

**John:** And that’s why they want to be able to do that.

**Craig:** And they picked that number, basically, and that’s how these negotiations work, because the contract covers everyone. So, obviously they wanted that number to be as low as possible, whereas the Writers Guild will want it to be as high as possible. I think $200,000 to $250,000 is unreasonably low, frankly, but it was set many, many years ago and we have other fish to fry when we deal with those guys.

**John:** Agreed.

Next question comes from Tucker. He writes, “You mentioned on a podcast a long while back that you often have to go away from your family on a retreat of some kind to ‘break the back’ of the script. I ask because I’m working on my first studio job at home, with a family around me, and they don’t understand why I’m acting like an insane person when ‘little things pop up that need to be done.’ Can you call Wells Fargo and chat with customer service for an hour? Can you handle the AT&T repair guy who needs to be chaperoned? Can you, can you, can you?”

**Craig:** Mm-hmm.

**John:** “I wish I was at some desert hotel somewhere.”

**Craig:** [laughs] Well, you know, I do think at some point we should do — there’s an entire podcast to be done about the spouses, the poor, poor spouses of writers. I think that Tucker has got a false dichotomy here. So, retreating and going into the desert is not the same as not being in your house with your family around you.

You can be around the corner. You can be at a Starbucks if you need to. I do believe that you must separate from your family and your children for certain hours of the day in order to get your work done. That’s not selfish. Everybody else gets to do it, so why don’t we?!

And you know they don’t understand what it means to be yanked out of your own head when you’re in it, either because you’re suffering in your head, or you’re succeeding in your head. The last thing you want is to be pulled out of it. And you can be irritable and it’s not good for them and it’s not good for you. And, you’re right, they don’t understand.

What they do understand is daddy is working. And daddy goes around the corner to work. Or daddy goes into the backyard. Or daddy goes down the street. You don’t have to go to the desert.

**John:** I think you’re right about the sense of a writer needs to take responsibility for how he or she is both being a writer and both being a member of a family. And so that daily work balance is going to be an ongoing negotiation between the writer and the family.

Tucker, I think, is sort of asking two questions. He’s asking that daily life question. That first paragraph, though, was about breaking the back of something. And that’s something I actually do. And even before I had a family, I would go away to barricade myself in a room to get started on a script, and I still do it to this day.

To me what’s so helpful about going someplace else to start is that I’m out of my normal environment, and so I’ve shown up someplace to do nothing other than work on this thing. And every waking moment can be about that thing.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** And I’ll often go to the place where the movie is going to be set so I can sort of live in that environment and sort of see what that’s like, although I’ve often gone to Vegas to do it, too, because Vegas midweek is really cheap. And when you get completely stir crazy in your room in Vegas you can just wander and go someplace else. And you can be alone around a lot of people very easily in Vegas, especially I’m not drinking, I’m not gambling, so I’m a weirdo in Vegas, but it’s kind of great. And there’s food, and all that stuff is lovely.

**Craig:** You’re right. Aside from the context of your relationship with your family, you may be the kind of writer that needs to separate from reality itself and enter a bubble world in order to enter your bubble world. I get that. I can enter bubble world wherever. You can put me on my roof and I can do it. But there are a lot of people that really benefit from that.

I know Rian Johnson just spent quite a long time in Paris because he was breaking the back of his next movie and he needed to essentially go separate from everything and, you know, we don’t give ourselves enough credit for the relationship between the way we’re feeling in the moment around us and how we’re feeling when we’re writing. This is why writers drink. This is why they do all sorts of self-destructive things because, frankly, it makes the writing easier.

It doesn’t make your life easier. So, if you can find safe ways to do it, like sitting in a room in Vegas and not killing prostitutes, then I say absolutely.

**John:** So, my breaking the back process is I will generally hop on a plane, be someplace, and every waking moment is about that script or about one boring book that I’m allowed to go to. So, I don’t turn on the TV. I don’t turn on the iPad. I don’t turn on my phone. And it’s only about that. And what’s useful is I’ll wake up in the morning and I will force myself to hand write a scene before I’m allowed to get out of bed.

I will have breakfast, and I will force myself to hand write a new scene before I can do the next thing I want to do. And so in that process I can write 17 or 20 pages by hand in a day. If I do that for three or four days, I’ve got 45, 50 pages of my script started. And that’s usually breaking the back for me. Once I feel like I have — I’m writing out of sequence, so I’m not necessarily just writing the first act. But I really know who those characters are. I know what the world is. I know what the voices are. And I’m back into sort of full writing mode.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** Because a lot of times between big writing assignments, I’m not writing that much. And so sometimes I just need to actually sort of build up some steam and sort of get those muscles back working.

**Craig:** Yes.

**John:** Then it’s much easier for me to get started doing stuff. I try also not to put all those pages together right away. I want to get up to like 60 or 65 pages of sort of knowing that I have that much material before I start pasting all those things together and seeing the whole script. If I do that too early, if I start looking at the whole script too early I will start editing and moving commas around and I will never get the full thing bit.

**Craig:** You know, and for me, that is part of it. Part of the work that I do. What’s interesting is that while we can agree that separating from people while you’re in that space is a good thing, even if you just are going around the corner, or if you’re going somewhere else, what we also know is that we’re very different. All of us are very different.

I’ve heard so many different — everybody it seems has their own unique approach to tricking themselves into writing and part of the struggle of being a new writer is you’re figuring out what works for you. And so, unfortunately, you’re just going to have to figure it out.

**John:** Yes. You are the guinea pig and the scientist.

**Craig:** All at the same time.

**John:** Next question is — I didn’t write down the person’s name, but it’s about speccing a pilot. He writes, or she writes, I think it’s a he: “I’ve been trying to start a career as a screenwriter for the last 18 months. And though I’ve gotten some positive feedback, I have not yet secured representation from a manager or an agent. A producer approached me recently about writing an outline for a spec TV pilot, which I did.

“He liked the outline, and now wants me to write the full script for the pilot.”

**Craig:** Oh, does he?

**John:** “And is asking what I expect in terms of compensation.”

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** “I looked at the scheduled minimums in the WGA basic agreement.”

**Craig:** Rational.

**John:** “But I have gotten the distinct impression that the producer is not willing to pay me the amount that document stipulates.”

**Craig:** What?! [laughs]

**John:** “His company is not a WGA signatory. And I’m not a WGA member, so I feel like I have no leverage here. I want to do the job because it would be my first paid writing gig, but I don’t want to undervalue myself. I feel clueless about what I should do next.” Craig Mazin…

**Craig:** Mm-hmm.

**John:** …help this person out.

**Craig:** [stifling a scream] Okay. So, look, everything that has happened is as I have foreseen. [laughs] Of course you want to be a paid writer. Of course. And of course. You don’t want to undervalue yourself. And of course you feel clueless about what’s going on. And of course the producer has presented himself as somebody who knows exactly what’s going on. And of course he wants you to write this for free. Of course.

You know why? Because all that makes sense for him. The one thing that he has over you is he’s not an artist who is — I don’t want to use the word desperate. He is not an artist who craves approval for the art. He is a businessman who is going to make money off of you. Okay?

So, he is in a great space because he can ask for these things with no problem, knowing full well that you have an emotion involved that he doesn’t have to deal with. Please resist this emotion.

Here’s the deal: in your letter you say “I feel like I have no leverage.” Incorrect. You have all of the leverage. Let me repeat. You have all of the leverage. Not 99%. 100%. And the leverage is that you own the writing. It is yours. The copyright is yours.

Everything that is attached to it, and every decision that will be made, up until the point where you assign copyright to somebody else, all of that is yours. And his game is to convince you that you have nothing. [laughs] Do you see how this works? Pretty amazing. So, friend, here’s the deal. You can do whatever you want. What you can’t do is work for hire.

Work for hire means I don’t have the copyright anymore. Somebody else has the copyright and they’re commissioning the work for me. That’s what you do when you run into a studio. You dig? And that is a Writers Guild job, and there are minimums, and credit protections, and health, and pension, and all sorts of great things, residuals and so on.

Until that moment, you do not sell it. You can option it. Haven’t sold it yet. Okay? Or, you can write it and shop it around. And then is somebody is in love with it, they can take it into a studio. But you do not sell it. A financier may come along and say we want to do it independently, non-union. Great. Here’s my lawyer. Work out what I get when this movie — and now I’ve got a backend on this thing. Whatever you do, just remember you have all the leverage.

**John:** Yeah. So, what Craig is making the strong distinction between is a work for hire, which is what writers do when they work for a studio. They are a work for hire and you are assigning copyright to that person and they are paying you to write.

**Craig:** Yes.

**John:** That is a very different thing from here’s writing something. This producer may ultimately option that thing you write and try to set it up at a studio, or you may just honestly have a handshake, like a shopping agreement essentially. “I’m allowing you to take it to these places and that person may be able to set it up.”

So, you value their interaction. You value their notes. But don’t value their money because it’s not going to be that much money. So, write the thing so you own it. And once it’s written, if that person still wants to do something with it, you can have that conversation about an option agreement, some sort of shopping agreement. But do not write for this person for less than this amount of money.

**Craig:** And as always, please seek the advice of an attorney.

**John:** So, this is a related question. Toby writes, “I’m writing because I have achieved a level of success that is not quite amateur, but not quite big time pro. I have been paid and I am patterned with a bestselling novelist to adapt his next release. However, I have found the biggest problem a writer of my level has is the pressure to work for free is unrelenting.”

**Craig:** Hmm.

**John:** “I would say that almost 100% of my non-general meetings have been with producers who have property they want to turn into a screenplay. These producers are people who have had at least one producer credit to their name and seem to have credible projects with life right, novel rights, etc. They’re just unwilling to pay any money for a draft.”

**Craig:** Oh, imagine that.

**John:** “To illustrate my point, I’ve included an mail exchange with my former manager in which he is asking me to extend an option on a spec script of mine that he originally optioned for free. He clearly wants the script but is unwilling to pay for it.”

This is a quote from this manager. “Reality is that it will be unrealistic for you to think that anyone will pay an option for this script. It is simply not done anymore. I also have spent an undo amount of time on all of our projects…”

**Craig:** Undue amount. Undue amount!

**John:** Oh yeah. An undue amount.

**Craig:** Undue. It wasn’t due.

**John:** Yes. Oh, it’s actually the wrong kind of due, that’s true. “Not to mention the notes I give to make your script better early on. I offered my services on this one as a gesture of good faith for all the time you’ve spent.”

**Craig:** Argh. Argh.

**John:** “But I don’t think you’ve ever really accepted the fact that there is no monetizing the time we spend in this entertainment game unless the projects go.”

**Craig:** Ugh.

**John:** Craig Mazin, do you find any part of that quote to be true?

**Craig:** It’s actually amazing how it’s all the opposite of true! Every word is the opposite of true. What a con artist! What a con artist.

First of all, let’s go backwards. “I don’t think you have ever really accepted the fact that there is no monetizing the time we spend in this entertainment game unless the projects go.” Wrong! There is no monetizing it for you, the not writer who doesn’t write stuff, unless the projects go. This is just me, me, me, me, me, but it’s not about the writer because we get paid all the time for movies that aren’t made.

You know why? Because there’s a value to what we do that is so important that they’re willing to give us money for stuff that they don’t even know they want to make. But, go back a little further. He has “spent an undo” — misspelled — “amount of time on all of our projects Not to mention the notes I gave to make your script better early on.”

Dude, screw off. We don’t need you. Okay?

**John:** Yeah. By the way, those notes you were giving, that was to build this relationship that you are now throwing under the bus so you can get a free extension on this offer.

**Craig:** Right. You joined with me in partnership. And the partnership was this: You’re going to help me. I’m going to write a script. I’m going to get paid, and you’re going to get 10%. Isn’t that wonderful? And now you’re complaining that I’m making choices that might keep you from your belief of how we’re going to get your 10%. And suddenly all these things I did for you were favors.

No they’re not. And this is why managers make me sick sometimes, because they do this nonsense. They play these nonsense games. And because their business is crunched, crunched, they psychologically abuse the people they are supposed to be protecting. This is an abusive email.

And I’m so glad. The only thing that keeps me from not driving to Toby’s house and killing him is that it says “former manager.” Thank god.

But, listen, guys, this is tied into the same email before. I don’t care. And I have never met a writer, a successful writer, who cares about what these people need. I’ve got my own problems over here. I’m trying to write screenplays. And it’s hard. I don’t care what the producer needs. I don’t care what the manager needs. They’re supposed to be helping me! That’s the point.

Is that selfish? Eh, I guess I’m selfish. All I know is that if I write a hit movie, they end up getting so much more money than I do that I guess I can feel okay about it. [laughs] So, that’s the story. I get paid now. They get paid later. I get paid a pretty good amount now. They get paid crazy amounts later if the movie works. And I’m cool with that, but then please don’t play games with me.

**John:** Let’s go back to an earlier part of Toby’s letter where he writes that he is in these rooms with producers who have rights to things and would like him to write a script, but they don’t want to pay him to right that script.

And this is a thing that you and I all have friends who are in similar situations. Even Kelly Marcel, who was on our last podcast together, the Saving Mr. Banks was kind of that situation where she wasn’t really paid to write this script originally.

**Craig:** I don’t know if that’s true.

**John:** Well, she said in the podcast. I asked was this essentially a spec script you were writing for this producer. And she said, “Yes, there’s no money in British film.”

**Craig:** Oh, okay, yes, that’s true. And by the way, in England, yes, I remember that now. You’re absolutely right. And in England, there is such a different deal going on, because there is no work for hire and it’s a whole crazy thing. And I don’t understand how British law works, but here…

**John:** So, I would say in general, I’ve been in these kind of situations, even sort of at this point in my career. When that comes up, what they really need to be expressing this to you as is like, “Let us partner on this thing.” And I think if you’re considering coming in to write thing, it can’t be a work for hire because they’re not hiring you.

**Craig:** Correct.

**John:** They’re not paying you.

**Craig:** Correct.

**John:** So, it’s essentially like you are partnering up with them to try to develop this property into a thing that is a thing.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** And it’s a negation on both sides, because if they have some bundle of rights, well that bundle of rights is important for you to be able to write your essential spec script. And so that’s complicated. That doesn’t mean it can’t happen, but it’s going to be complicated. And that’s why you’re lucky to be, Toby, at a point in your life where you do have an agent and a manger and you have producer credits and you can figure this out.

**Craig:** That’s right.

**John:** And you are essentially becoming their partner, not just the writer that they’re hiring, because they’re not hiring.

**Craig:** And that’s the kind of push and pull of this. They have rights that they need turned into a screenplay and they can’t do it on their own. You have the ability to turn books into screenplays, but you don’t have the rights. Well, that sounds like a negotiation to me. And the product of that negotiation is an option. Right?

Now, the option could be for a dollar. It could be for zero dollars. It could be for $10,000. It depends, frankly, on where everybody is. And are there other writers they want for this? Or are you absolutely perfect? And is this a book that you absolutely love, or this is a book that you would do anything to write? Either way, when this idiot says that options simply aren’t done anymore, he’s lying.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Lying! He’s a liar. I know that this is crazy that there are liars in Hollywood, but there are liars in Hollywood.

**John:** Let’s end on a craft question. Matt writes, “I’ve read and seen two schools of thoughts and wanted to get your opinions on both. One states that the end of the second act should be the ultimate low point, the all-is-lost moment. The other states that it’s the time when the protagonist makes his decision to go forward with his new life, or fall back on his old ways. Which one is better? Which one gets shot down more by agents or producers?” What a bad way to end the question.

**Craig:** [laughs]

**John:** What is the end of the second act to you, Craig Mazin?

**Craig:** To me, it’s neither of the things that are put here. The way that these are described are typical for books and things written by people who essentially analyze. They’re after the fact thinkers. They watch movies. They read scripts. And then they try and find patterns in them and then present those patterns. But they’re not before the fact advice. We writers, we live before the fact. We must build it, right? So what’s before the fact advice?

For me, what’s roughly going on at that point in the movie is this: the character used to believe something. They believed it, maybe for bad reasons or good reasons, but it was the thing that helped them survive. It was a thing that they would have believed for the rest of their life on some deep fundamental level had the movie not occurred.

There is another thing they should be believing, and they will believe it by the end of the story. In fact, they will believe it so strongly that they will behave in accordance with it, even at risk to their own life. However, at this point in the movie, they have become aware that what they used to believe in is not true. And what they ought to believe in is simply too scary to comprehend. They are caught. And they are adrift emotionally and they are adrift almost intellectually and they don’t know what to do. They realize they can’t go back and they don’t know how to go forward.

**John:** I don’t disagree with you, Craig, but what I will say is that what you just described does feel kind of screenwriting book theory. I think it’s Craig Mazin’s screenwriting book theory, but it does feel sort of general framework-y in terms of like the generic sort of movie protagonist hero, this is where he or she is at in their situation. So, I’m in no ways diminishing sort of what I think that is largely true, I would just point out that did sound like it could be from a screenwriting book.

**Craig:** Well, I will say that that is a portion of a thing that there’s a bunch of stuff leading up to it, in fact, this was the thing that I did in Austin that is…

**John:** I was going to ask if that was…

**Craig:** It’s sort of not, at least as far as I know, not screenwriting book-y, but look at some point all these answers I suppose will sort of — I will say there doesn’t even have to be this in the script. You know what I mean? There’s no trap where you have to do this kind of thing. But to me when it happens, this is why. It’s not — I’m more concerned about why things happen and less concerned about that they should happen.

**John:** I would challenge you to take a look at the end of the second act from the audience’s perspective, which is we’ve watched this journey, we’ve watched this movie. Whatever has been happening, that thing has just ended. And now we’re into one last push. And to me, the end of the second act/start of the third act means that we as an audience are aware that we are on the final part of this journey. And that the movie is getting ready to reach it’s big conclusion.

**Craig:** Sure.

**John:** And so it’s a thing that as an audience, even if you’re not really aware of like character motivations and stories and how thematically things are working, you have a sense that like that thing is done and now we’re in this last stretch of the movie. And that can apply to almost any genre of movie you think about. You get that sense like this is going to be the last push.

And when it’s not the last push you feel like it’s jarring. And so it has to be setup just right that you can sense like that’s done, and now we’re in this last thing.

**Craig:** Well, you know, here. You and I are kind of like the proverbial blind men describing an elephant, because we’re feeling different parts of this thing. I always think about a movie working on three essential axes at any given point. There is internally what’s going on in the protagonist’s mind. There’s what’s happening between the protagonist and the people around him. And then there’s what’s happening externally in the world around all of them. So, I was kind of sort of talking about a very internal thing. You’re talking about a very external thing, too.

And both of those must be serviced. And, similarly, the interpersonal as well. But the question of how to create that moment, I think, oftentimes I find thinking internally gets you to what you need to make happen externally. But that’s me. You know, that’s just my…

**John:** Cool. And I think we’re at the point for some One Cool Things.

**Craig:** Ooh, I’m so excited.

**John:** Mine is really simple. So, it’s a podcast. Craig doesn’t listen to any podcasts other than our own podcast.

**Craig:** What’s a podcast?

**John:** But I listen to some other ones, and one of them that I like a lot is called Planet Money. It’s an NPR podcast. And they talk about financial issues, economic issues. It’s a good, chatty, really well produced podcast about those topics.

The reason why I bring it up this week is they’re doing a whole series of podcasts about they’re making the Planet Money t-shirts and they’re sort of going all the way back to like the growing of the cotton and sort of how the whole thing works, and how the whole supply chain comes together, which I find fascinating and in our very connected world, how this all works.

So, that series is just starting, but they’ve had little blips of episodes where they talk about even the process of like getting the money from, they Kickstarted it. So, like transferring the money from the Kickstarter PayPal to their own bank account took like four days. And why did it take so long? So, there’s a special episode where they just talk about the clearinghouse for checks and how that all works.

And it’s this incredibly bizarre, antiquated system that we have in the US that needs to be overhauled, and yet it would be very difficult to overhaul. So, I endorse the Planet Money podcast. That particular episode and especially the upcoming series on t-shirts.

**Craig:** And this is called a podcast?

**John:** It’s called a podcast. People listen to it on their mobile devices sometimes.

**Craig:** Hmm.

**John:** It’s actually the thing you’re doing right now, but you kind of just think we’re having a conversation.

**Craig:** I’m sorry. People are listening to this?

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Oh wow. Oh god.

**John:** There’s actually not an audience in front of Craig. He thinks it’s just a conversation between us.

**Craig:** I am mortified. [laughs] I have said things…

**John:** I’ve been recording this whole thing, Craig.

**Craig:** You’re supposed to tell me that. That’s against the law. And I am mortified. Some of the things I’ve said. Oh my god!

**John:** I know. Terrible, terrible shocking things.

**Craig:** Terrible, terrible shocking things. Well, my One Cool Thing this week is by far my one favorite, my most favorite Cool Thing of all the Cool Things I’ve done, which I think is 12 at this point.

And, John, do you know what my One Cool Thing is this week?

**John:** I don’t.

**Craig:** It’s you.

**John:** Come on. That’s too…

**Craig:** No, no. No, no, no, you’ve got to her me out.

**John:** Rawson Thurber already used, oh, he used both of us I guess.

**Craig:** Yeah, I know, and it’s totally different anyway. Listen, here’s the thing. So, I don’t know what people know of our story, but you and I have really gotten to know each other over the course of the podcast. We knew each other before the podcast, but we just sort of knew each other. It wasn’t like we hung out or anything. We just kind of knew each other.

And so we’re in Austin and I don’t know what it was, whether it was alcohol, or just whatever is going on in your life, but it was the best John August ever. It was such a great John August time. And at one point, and hopefully you remember, you came up to me, you saw me, you came up to me, and you hugged me.

**John:** I came up and hugged you from behind on the little Driskill balcony downstairs because I was saying good night to everybody and I felt like I need to hug…

**Craig:** Oh, sure, walk it back. Walk it back all you want.

**John:** I’m not walking it back at all.

**Craig:** Listen…

**John:** I would say that I was the bounciest, Tiggeriest form of myself at Austin.

**Craig:** Yes. You were great. It was so much fun hanging out with you. I had such a great time. And because we spend actually a lot of time together but not together, it’s such a strange friendship that we have because it’s a podcast friendship, but we were really — I mean, look, you may still hate me, but you were such a great friend over the course of that weekend. So, my One Cool Thing is John…

**John:** Aw…

**Craig:** No, my One Cool Thing is Austin John August. [laughs]

**John:** Thank you. Why can’t John be like Austin John all the time?

**Craig:** Well, that’s exactly right. And, you know, we were talking about doing our next, one of our next podcasts with Aline Brosh McKenna, the Joan Rivers of Scriptnotes, and she had this great suggestion that we should just drink through the whole thing. I really think we should. I think it’s going to be fun.

**John:** I suspect that may end up happening.

**Craig:** Yeah!

**John:** Yes. But first we’re going to have to go through our standard boilerplate. If you have a question for me or for Craig that is short, the best way to get to us is on Twitter. I’m @johnaugust. He is @clmazin.

If you have a longer question, like some of the ones we read today, ask@johnaugust.com is the best place to send those questions.

If you would like a t-shirt, they’re going to be at store.johnaugust.com, right now, hopefully, up and running. They’re black and they’re cool. So, we take preorders for two weeks, and then we make all the t-shirts, and we send them out. So, that way we don’t have to keep making t-shirts all the time. It’s just a one-time thing.

If you are listening to this podcast, this is a podcast we’re making, they are available on iTunes.

**Craig:** A what?! [laughs]

**John:** iTunes is this magical portal through which you can subscribe to things. So, subscribe to us in iTunes and while you’re there you can give us a comment. That actually weirdly affects sort of how we rank in the whole ratings of the iTunes universe. And that’s kind of useful because that way more people can find us. So, if you’d like to do that, we welcome those.

And we should actually probably read some of those aloud on the air, because those are kind of fun.

**Craig:** Oh, it’s embarrassing to me. Do you know I want to, down the line, could we do an Austin John August t-shirt. Because that is a great professional wrestling name, by the way. Austin John August!

**John:** That would be good.

**Craig:** This really feels good to me. I’m really digging this right now.

**John:** It’s very nice. One of the other sort of memes of the Austin Film Festival is that everyone with a shaved head sort of looks like me, or I look like everyone with a shaved head. So, there were a lot of false spotting of John August. Like John Hamburg sort of looks like me. And there was one guy who on Twitter kept saying, “I thought I saw John August, but it was actually a random person.” Then like right as I was getting in the van to go back to the airport, he spotted me and I shook his hand. So, it was nice that we finally connected.

**Craig:** I look like no one.

**John:** You look like Craig Mazin. That’s just what you should look like.

**Craig:** No, I’m visual noise.

**John:** You’re a special snowflake.

**Craig:** I’m just visual noise. [laughs]

**John:** [laughs] All right, thank you so much, Craig, and we’ll talk next week.

**Craig:** You got it.

**John:** All right, bye.

Links:

* The [John August Store](http://store.johnaugust.com/) is open for business!
* [Get your Big Fish tickets now](http://www.bigfishthemusical.com/), and use discount code SCRIPT (for November 23rd or otherwise)
* John’s post on [how we record Scriptnotes](http://johnaugust.com/2013/how-we-record-scriptnotes)
* T-Bone Burnett [in the Hollywood Reporter](http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/earshot/t-bone-burnett-silicon-valley-652114)
* [Anita Sarkeesian](http://www.feministfrequency.com/) and her Tropes vs Women in Video Games project
* Complex’s [The 15 Hottest Damsels In Distress In Movies](http://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2012/07/the-15-hottest-damsels-in-distress-in-movies)
* TV Tropes on [damsels in distress](http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DamselInDistress?from=Main.DistressedDamsel)
* MacGuffins on [TV Tropes](http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/MacGuffin) and [Screenwriting.io](http://screenwriting.io/what-is-a-mcguffin/)
* [Planet Money podcast](https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/npr-planet-money-podcast/id290783428?mt=2)
* Planet Money on the [American check system](http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2013/10/04/229224964/episode-489-the-invisible-plumbing-of-our-economy)
* Craig’s [One Cool Thing](http://johnaugust.com/onecoolthings) is [John August](http://johnaugust.com/)
* [Outro](http://johnaugust.com/2013/scriptnotes-the-outros) by Scriptnotes listener Matthew Chielli

Scriptnotes, Ep 115: Scriptnotes: Back to Austin with Rian Johnson and Kelly Marcel — Transcript

October 31, 2013 Scriptnotes Transcript

The original post for this episode can be found [here](http://johnaugust.com/2013/scriptnotes-back-to-austin-with-rian-johnson-and-kelly-marcel).

**Disclaimer:** The following podcast contains explicit language. There’s also a Q&A at the end where there wasn’t a microphone in the audience, so we’ve cut out all the questions. So, at the end of the episode if it seems like it’s kind of choppy and we’re jumping forward, that’s because we don’t want you to hear a bunch of silence. Enjoy!

**John August:** Hello and welcome. My name is John August.

**Craig Mazin:** My name is Craig Mazin.

**John:** And this is Scriptnotes Live at the Austin Film Festival.

[Audience applauds]

**Craig:** They did that very well.

**John:** They did it incredibly well. This is clearly our smartest audience by far.

**Craig:** Yeah. It’s the first good audience we’ve ever had.

**John:** It really is. You put them all to shame. So, we did our first live podcast here at the Austin Film Festival last year. And our guests were Aline Brosh McKenna and Franklin Leonard and they were terrific. So, we knew we couldn’t top that, but we knew we wanted to do something else that’s new and great.

**Craig:** Emulate it.

**John:** Well, yeah, we’re like Apple and we have to have a new thing every time, and so this is our new sort of keynote address is the Austin Film Festival.

**Craig:** I think we can top it, actually. I think we have topped it. And I think we’re going to top it.

**John:** I think it’s going to be a pretty good show today.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** We have a little bit of housekeeping. And housekeeping is a thing that happens on every podcast essentially where you have to talk about the things that are going on in the world. My housekeeping is really simple.

I wrote this musical called Big Fish that’s running on Broadway right now. It’s going really well and people seem to like it and that’s great. But one of the producers is Jimmy Buffett. And Jimmy Buffett is wonderful. I’ve spent a lot of time in rooms with Jimmy Buffett over the last six months. And he’s like, “John, it’s great to see you!” He’s really excited about the show and it’s terrific. He’s from Alabama.

He asked the producers, “Hey, can I get a discount code for all the Parrotheads to come see the show?” And they said sure. And I’m like, oh, okay.

But I had a discount code if you recall during previews and that was great. And I had a bunch of people come. And that was fantastic. So, I said like, “Can I get a discount code, too, that’s as good as Jimmy’s?” And they said, “…Okay, fine.”

And so the discount code is SCRIPT. So, if you’re going to go see Big Fish in New York, on Broadway, up till about the holidays you can use the SCRIPT code either at Ticketmaster or literally at the box office. And tickets are like $85 rather than $140.

**Craig:** Why don’t they just become Parrotheads?

**John:** Because then they’d be Parrotheads. I really think there is — I want to separate the audience between Jimmy Buffett people and Scriptnotes —

**Craig:** I really don’t. I want that shit to be mingled up. I want to see your people…

**John:** Yeah, you want the mixture.

**Craig:** …and people who love Cheeseburger in Paradise. I want to see them all.

— Are we cursing in this podcast, by the way?

**John:** Apparently we are now.

**Craig:** All right.

**John:** No, sit over there. Sit over there. Sit over there. No, you’re not up here yet.

**Craig:** Worst guest ever.

**John:** Worst guest ever. Sit on the side.

**Craig:** Do you know how hard it is to be both late and early at the same time?

**John:** Rian Johnson pulled off the impossible trick.

**Craig:** Unreal.

**John:** Today we — well, we needed some great guests if we were going to do a live show here in Austin.

**Craig:** So, we got one great guest. And then we got one…

**John:** Well, Craig, this is actually conversation — pull out your phone because I sent you half of this. Craig is completely unprepared for what we’re doing.

**Craig:** As per usual.

**John:** As per usual. So, we had to figure out who would be our guest at the Austin Film Festival.

**Craig:** I don’t have internet here.

**John:** Okay, so we’ll share a phone.

**Craig:** Aw, nice.

**John:** Nice.

This is September 7, 2013. This email thread began at 9:50am. It started with Erin Hallagan. Is Erin here? Erin Hallagan?

**Craig:** She runs the whole thing, by the way.

**John:** She runs the whole thing, the Austin Film Festival. She emailed me to ask, “Do you want to bring a guest on your podcast at the conference?”

I said, “Yes. We’d love Rian Johnson.”

Erin writes back, “Great. I’ll see what I can do. He’s already got a busy schedule. He is directing the Vince Gilligan script reading and we have yet to solidify the rehearsal schedule. Just in case, do you have any backups?”

I write back, adding in Craig, so he’s CC’d. “Craig, anyone you’d especially like for a guest at the AFF Scriptnotes? I asked about Rian. Who else?”

**Craig:** And I said, “I’ll make Rian do it. Screw him. He’s doing it.”

New email to Rian. “Rian, you’re going to be our guest for our live Scriptnotes podcast in Austin and that’s that. Agreed? Agreed.”

**John:** Rian Johnson at noon. “What day? I demand information and satisfaction?”

Craig emails back…

**Craig:** “Erin, please inform this man. Oh, and to be clear, I don’t give sideways shit about your rehearsal schedule, Johnson. This is one hour. You can do it. Drinks on me, and cigars, and drinks, but in the evening. This will be in the day. You’ll do it.”

**John:** So Erin Hallagan writes back. “Okay, now I’m worried about the three of you being in a room together.”

Rian, “You heard the man, you’re confirmed. You’ll have the biggest room on the biggest day for the biggest event, right?”

**Craig:** Nice.

**John:** Now, notice, “Saturday, October 26, 3:45 to 5pm.” Mmm. “Stephen F. Austin Ballroom.” So, two of those things are correct. So, it’s not 3:45pm.

**Craig:** Yeah, why is that?

**John:** I don’t know. They scheduled us against other big things, yet, we filled the room.

**Craig:** I don’t know. It looks pretty good. We should probably give them some sort of podcast value now for their time sitting here.

**John:** Yes. So, let us welcome this guest who we badgered into being on our show. The director of Brick, The Brothers Bloom, and, oh yeah, Looper. Rian Johnson, come up.

So, Rian Johnson, welcome. And thank you. And I said the director of, but it’s really the writer-director of these films. And I think of you as a writer-director, but in a weird way I think of you as a director-writer. You’re one of the few people who I associate as like a director who writes, rather than a writer who directs. Do you distinguish those two skills at all?

**Rian Johnson:** I don’t know. I mean, they are obviously really different, different things, but I mean, I grew up just kind of — my directing training, if you want to even call it that, was just making movies as a kid. And when you’re getting together with your friends on the weekends to make a movie, there’s not a writing and then a preproduction and postproduction. There’s just making a movie.

And in a certain way that’s still the way that me and this group of friends that I have that make these movies together, still approaching this in a way. It’s all kind of one continuous process, well, I guess. [Rian rambles quickly in another language].

**Craig:** That last part was interesting.

**Rian:** That was for you.

**Craig:** Reminded me of that part in Looper that I did not understand.

**Rian:** Nice!

**Craig:** I have a question for you. It seems to me that you must divorce yourself from a screenplay to some extent when you’re directing a movie. Hard to divorce yourself from yourself. But, where do you feel that happening, or is it that as you write you are essentially kind of marrying what you know you’re going to be doing and so there’s not a lot of internal conflict when you finally get there?

**Rian:** Yeah, I think that’s absolutely true. I don’t know if you guys have found the same thing, but when you get into production, you really do have to let go of the preciousness that you had when you were writing and just approach what’s working and what’s not in front of you.

The same way I think when you get into post-production, start editing, you have to divorce yourself from the man on set who forced everyone to stay up three extra hours to get that scene that you thought you needed, that was so important. And when you’re in the editing room you just hit one button and it’s gone because that’s what’s best for the movie.

So, yeah, I think there definitely are these firewalls, but I think because it’s such a lengthy process in filmmaking, that’s maybe a really healthy thing, I guess.

**John:** While you’re writing a scene, do you have a good sense of visually what it’s going to look like when it’s going to be all done? Are you seeing the finished product? Talk us through that process for you.

**Rian:** I typically am. Not to say that what I’m thinking when I’m writing ends up being it, but usually when I’m writing I am playing the movie in my head and seeing the shots. And a lot of times I’ll write around a particular visual image. It’s actually kind of hard for me to write a scene unless I can see how it’s going to be shot in my head, whether or not that ends up being the way we do it or not. And maybe that ties back to, again, it all just being kind of one process of making a movie.

**John:** Can we talk about what you’re doing now? Because after Looper, obviously everyone in this audience wants to know what the next thing is and sort of how far we are away from the next Rian Johnson movie. What is the process now? What has this been for you, figuring out the next movie?

**Rian:** It’s just been slow and painful, probably like the process of everyone in this room, I hope, so we don’t feel so alone. It’s like, yeah, we’re all just kind of — I don’t know, I didn’t have a —

When I came out of the second movie I made, The Brothers Bloom, I had this idea for Looper that had been sitting in a drawer for ten years. So, I could pull that down and start working on. I didn’t have that coming out of Looper, so I kind of started at square one with this thing I’m writing now. And so, yeah, I’ve just taken way too long at this point. It’s been about a year of working on the script, and writing it.

**Craig:** And you have a particular pressure that other directors don’t have. You only really direct what you write, at least you have so far. I won’t say what the movie was, but there was a movie that you could have done that I really wanted you to do and you said no, which bummed me out. Because I am fascinated by Rian Johnson the screenwriter, and fascinated by Rian Johnson the director.

Would you ever consider directing somebody else’s screenplay?

**Rian:** Yeah, I hate writing so much, in a way I would love that.

**Craig:** Right.

**Rian:** Like it would be just doing the fun part. And I’ve read — the thing is, I’ve read screenplays that I haven’t written that are better than anything I’ll ever be able to read in my life, but it’s especially when reading those and confronted with that option that I just kind of realize, you know, for better or worse, what turns me on about the whole process. And what I’m in it for is that thing, going back to making movies as a kid. Just starting with an idea and then seeing it through all the way to the end. So, you know, for better or worse, that’s kind of, yeah.

**Craig:** Well, so far for better, I have to say. I mean, all the movies have been really good.

**Rian:** Eventually for worse. It’ll be worse at some point.

**Craig:** Yeah, obviously —

**Rian:** I’ll get a lot worse.

**Craig:** This may be the moment.

**Rian:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Yeah. Well, you just talked about how you don’t know what you’re doing next.

**Rian:** I have no idea.

**Craig:** This might be — you peeked.

**John:** So, Rian, you talk about collaborators. Who are the people who you trust to read that first draft, who you show, “This is what I think I’m doing next?’

**Rian:** Well, it’s just close friends, basically. So, besides my producer, who’s also my close friend, Ram Bergman. I have my friends Dan and Stacy Chariton are a team writing, a screenwriting married couple, and they’re a screenwriting team. And I’ve known them since college. And we know each other so well that we can just be completely honest. And so bounce stuff back and forth.

And, yeah, and other friends. I think the closer relationship you have with someone, the better. Because taking notes is such a weird, complicate thing. And deciding to, both being brittle with yourself in terms of taking in honesty, but also keeping in your head that everybody has their own unique perspective and what they’re saying is not necessarily — you’re so desperate for another voice when you’ve had your head down in the cave for so long. It’s easy to go the other way and think that everything everyone says to you is the truth, is the sun shining on you for the first time.

**Craig:** You’ve happily experienced a lot of praise for the work you’ve done. When you are praised, A, do you agree with it, and B, how does it make you feel?

**John:** Craig basically wants to know —

**Rian:** Everything you said was so positive. Why do I feel so uncomfortable right now?

**John:** Craig basically wants to know what’s it like to get a good review.

**Rian:** [laughs]

**Craig:** What’s it like for somebody to look at you and smile?

**Rian:** [laughs]

**Craig:** Is that nice?

**John:** What is human kindness like?

**Craig:** How do your species handle this strange thing?

**Rian:** So, no, I’m trying to —

**Craig:** What I’m trying to get to is your self-loathing.

**Rian:** Yeah, let me dig half an inch and get to that for you.

**Craig:** Yeah, thank you.

**Rian:** Give me one second. No, the thing is though, and we’ve all — you guys have good reviews and bad reviews. You get them both. And the truth is that —

**Craig:** Uh-uh. No.

**Rian:** [laughs] You know, at the end of the day, I don’t know, the old, the cliché is true that you can read 99 good reviews, and if there was one bad one, that will be the one that you believe. And I think that’s just an inherent thing.

At the same time, I don’t know, I remember reading an interview with the Coen brothers where they asked them if they read their own reviews, and this was, I think, around The Man Who Wasn’t There, like around that time. And they said no. They said at a certain point you feel like you’ve read everything that can be written about your stuff and you’re not surprised by anything and so you just don’t have the urge to.

And I think that’s maybe the nirvana that we can all hope to get to someday. That genuine point where —

**Craig:** You just don’t care.

**Rian:** Yeah. Where you actually don’t care. Because it’s impossible not to read. You know, you’ve worked so long putting this thing out there and no matter what skill you put out there, and no matter what scale you’re reading it on, whether it’s the comments on your Vimeo account, or a review in the New York Times, it’s impossible not to read it and get torn up about it.

And, I don’t know, I don’t know that the notion of taking criticism and that making you a better filmmaker, I don’t know, it’s a very complicated thing.

**Craig:** I just wonder sometimes does praise start to frighten you to an extent because you got such a good response from Looper, for instance. I mean, Brick also. I mean, all the movies. But Looper really connected with people. And I wonder does that factor in when you sit down to write the next thing? Are you feeling like the guy who just hit a home run and now you feel like you have to do it again?

**Rian:** Well, no, but the thing is like The Brothers Bloom got very mixed reviews. So, when I sat down to write Looper I was terrified because of that, and pressured like, geez, I might just have one more chance at bat. I need to really make this one work. And so I think no matter what the reaction to what you did next, you can choose to carry that with you in an unhealthy way into the next process, or you can choose to do your best to kind of block it out.

**Craig:** Well, I choose unhealthy. What about you?

**John:** Oh, yeah, I’ve chosen to not read reviews at all.

**Rian:** Do you really?

**John:** Yeah.

**Rian:** Do you actually? That’s fantastic.

**John:** Starting with Frankenweenie, I haven’t read any reviews. And so sometimes you just sort of flip past them and you get a sense for what that is, but I didn’t read them. Because I knew Frankenweenie got mostly good reviews, but I knew exactly what you said. I would fixate on the one bad review.

And with Big Fish, even though we were opening in Chicago and doing all that trial stuff, so there was stuff to change and to fix. It was still a fluid thing. I didn’t want to fixate on that one reviewer’s criticism of that one song or that one moment because I would give way too much value to that.

And so constructive criticism and sort of notes that can actually improve things are great, but having it in print in a publication was not helpful to me.

**Rian:** Now, you’re really active on the internet though. Is that really, or when it’s just one click away, or in your Twitter feed —

**John:** Yeah. You always know it’s just there. And so there’s the threads you don’t open and the pages you don’t go to because you know it’s there and it’s waiting. And it’s tough because you’ll get a Google News Alert with your name in it and so you’ll see like, is that —

**Rian:** It’s evil. You can’t do that. No. Do you have a Google? I can’t. No.

**John:** I do that. It’s dangerous.

**Rian:** So how do you not do that thing, because that’s literally showing up — ?

**Craig:** I mean, that’s everything. That’s a steady stream. I mean, I don’t do it. Somebody sent me a link because I said something about my former college roommate, your Senator, Ted Cruz.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** And it was not, yeah, it was a bad thing. And someone sent me an email like, “Ha-ha, look at this.” And they sent me just the link to the article, an essay someone had written on a website. And the title was Craig Mazin is the Worst Person in American History.

Not the worst person say in English history. We’ll be meeting her shortly. But I felt really good that I was the worst person. That’s Google for you. How do you — ?

**John:** So, I got off the plane from — we had our opening night in Chicago, sorry, opening night in New York, so the real opening. Like it’s all done. It’s locked. It’s final.

And so I did not read any of the reviews, but they were going to come out that night. And so the flight lands on Monday morning in Los Angeles and I turn on my phone and the very first email is from a good friend who said like, “Fuck that guy at the New York Times. He doesn’t know what he’s talking about.”

So, I’m like, Oh no! Oh, no, that’s just not good at all. And so I went through this —

**Craig:** That’s the stupidest. Who sent that to you?

**John:** I’ll tell you after the event. It was such a well meaning thing, but like I had no exposure. And so because I had put myself in this bubble, this bubble of ignorance, I assumed that everything was bad. And so I just went into this really dark depressing place until finally my husband, who is very smart, said like, “Okay, I’ve read all the reviews. And let me tell you what they are.” And he broke them down for me in a way that was incredibly helpful and constructive.

**Craig:** My wife wouldn’t have done that. She would have been like, “Yeah, a lot of them are really…”

**John:** [laughs] They’re bad.

**Craig:** “There were some good ones, but those don’t count.”

**John:** No. They don’t count at all.

So, I would just say like my plan for ignorance did not completely succeed, too. So, there’s no perfect way to get through that.

**Craig:** Rian, one last question for you for all the folks here. You are a great inspiration, I would imagine, to a lot of people who are starting out. They don’t live in Los Angeles. They don’t have a bunch of money to make a movie. They aren’t going to be getting their script to some big movie star. But you didn’t have a lot of money and you weren’t in LA. Well, in Brick I guess you were at that at USC or something.

**Rian:** Yeah.

**Craig:** But you made Brick, and you really did make it. You made it. And I’m just curious for all the people here what advice you have for them in terms of believing in themselves as self-starters and self-finishers.

**John:** Yeah. I mean, the one, and I remember when there were many. Like I wrote Brick when I was 23 and we didn’t make it until I was 30. And I was trying to make it for all those years and failing. So, I basically spent my twenties over and over getting and losing money to make this little movie.

And I remember asking people who had made indie movies, like how do you do it? And I would always be so frustrated by what I thought was the bullshit answer of, you know, “You got to just stick with it. You’ve just got to be persistent.”

And now having made one and also knowing a lot of people who have made them, I mean, the truth is it’s that thing where the road rolls up behind every different person who does it. There is really no trick. And I find myself giving that same answer, which I now know isn’t bullshit. The only universal advice that is absolutely true is just persistence. I really think if you have a story you love, if you’ve worked on it, and honed it, and it’s good, and you stick with it, it’s going to get made and it’s going to get in front of people.

The one practical thing I will say, after years and years of trying and failing to get the movie made, I met my producer, Ram Bergman. And the one huge thing he kind of set me right on is he said, “You’re going about this completely wrong. You have talked to some line producer that you know and they have given you a budget. They’ve given you a number which you now say, ‘I need this number to make my movie.’ And you go out to look for that amount.”

And he says, “Chances are you will never get your movie made doing that. What you need to do is look at what you can get your hands on right now in terms of money and resources and then back into that number and figure out how to make the movie for that and go and make it now.”

And he was absolutely right. And once we switched to that, that’s how — that’s when we made the film.

**Craig:** That’s a great answer. Terrific.

**John:** That’s a great answer. Let us bring up our second guest who is really Craig’s guest.

**Craig:** Yes.

**John:** And so Craig basically would not stop talking about this person who needed to be on our show.

**Craig:** Kelly Marcel is a fantastic screenwriter. She has a movie coming out this Christmas directed by our collective good friend, John Lee Hancock, called Saving Mr. Banks. I don’t know if you guys have seen the trailer for it. Well, apparently Rian has.

No need for false applause. I promise you real applause is forthcoming when you see the film. It’s excellent. It’s going to make you cry. And it’s a great Hollywood story. I don’t know if you guys love Mary Poppins the way I love Mary Poppins, but it’s the story of Pam Travers who wrote the Mary Poppins books, coming to Los Angeles to basically battle — a battle of wills between her and Walt Disney. And Tom Hanks plays Walt Disney and Emma Thompson plays Pam Travers. It’s an amazing cast.

And it’s a wonderful movie. And she’s also writing a very smaller film called Fifty Shades of Grey.

**John:** It’s about moral ambiguity and I think of the Cold War?

**Craig:** I think it’s honestly about colors. I think it’s about grey. So, it’s a paint-based, smaller.

**John:** Oh, it’s that famous color blind painter. That’s what it was.

**Craig:** It’s about Escher. And, anyway, she is a wonderful lady with the best accent ever. Ladies and gentlemen, Kelly Marcel.

**John:** Kelly Marcel! Hi Kelly.

**Kelly Marcel:** Hey!

**John:** Hey!

**Kelly:** Hey!

**John:** Hi! So, we were going to do this whole thing where you had like a Southern California accent and that we pretended that you were not British, but you’re actually British, aren’t you?

**Kelly:** Yes, I am. And my audition wasn’t very good this morning.

**Craig:** Well, you got a couple of sentences down that were okay, and then they fell —

**Kelly:** Just fell apart.

**Craig:** Yeah. You’re American is not as good as my British. [laughs]

**Kelly:** It’s true. He’s great.

**John:** I have not seen Saving Mr. Banks, but you guys have? Both of you?

**Craig:** Yes, we’ve both seen it. Yes.

**John:** So, can you give me the backstory on how this movie came into your life and what the genesis of this is for you?

**Kelly:** Yeah. There was a British producer called Alison Owen who came to me in England and I had just left a TV show that I created called Terra Nova because they wanted to put dinosaurs in it and I didn’t want them to. [laughs] And so she was like, “Oh, you wrote the dinosaur show. You should write this thing about Mary Poppins.”

I was like, all right.

No, she told me the story of Pam Travers which I didn’t know and it’s a really, really fascinating story. And there was this originating script by this Australian writer called Sue Smith who had sort of done a birth to death biopic of P.L.’s whole life, which is completely fascinating but enormous.

And in the middle of it was this little story where she goes to LA and Alison had felt that was the film and asked if I could kind of reimagine it. And I thought it was great. I thought it would never get made because it had to be full of Poppins songs and we were going to put Walt Disney in it and I just thought we’d get a cease and desist order from Disney, but decided to write it anyway because I thought it would be a really lovely sample and honestly just couldn’t leave it alone.

**John:** Great. So, at this point you’re working with just this producer, so Disney is not involved?

**Kelly:** No.

**John:** And is she paying you to do this, or is this a spec essentially for you to be writing?

**Kelly:** There’s no money in British film. So, yeah, essentially it was a spec.

**John:** So, after you have the script, what is the next step for this entering into the world of a makeable movie? What happened?

**Kelly:** Do you know, it was really quick. I only wrote this script just under three years ago, so it’s a amazing that it’s coming out now. And basically what happened was the Black List. And so the script kind of went out, a lot of producers were reading it, people really loved it. It ended up on the Black List and Disney were like, “What’s this film that has our founder in it and all the Mary Poppins songs? We need to shut this down.”

And then they got hold of it and thankfully were really smart and lovely and decided to make it with our lovely John Lee instead.

**Craig:** The lovely John Lee.

**Kelly:** Yeah, it was really the Black List.

**Craig:** I’m sort of fascinated by your career arc for obvious reasons. I mean, you did start on —

**Kelly:** It’s just the sex thing, isn’t it? It’s the Fifty Shades of Grey. That’s why you’re fascinated.

**Craig:** Yeah, we’re working up to that. So, you start with science fiction.

**Kelly:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Alternate world science fiction, not including dinosaurs.

**Kelly:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Then you have a biopic, a period piece biopic that’s sort of a Hollywood story, but really a story of family tragedy, and past and redemption. And then the movie about paint. So, my question is not, “Oh, isn’t that interesting.” I mean, it is interesting. My question really is do you have a genre or do you care about genre? Or do you feel attracted — something about particular stories that could go in any genre?

**Kelly:** Yeah. I just, well, I very specifically didn’t want to get pigeonholed. So, after Terra Nova I was just being offered sci-fi jobs, like loads and loads of sci-fi jobs. And I kind of realized with Terra Nova, because it’s rubbish, that that’s not my genre.

**John:** Yeah.

**Kelly:** And so I didn’t want to make that mistake again. But, no, really it’s about — it’s just about stories that I want to tell and that I think are fascinating. And I kind of want to write everything, if it’s got an interesting core.

**Craig:** Define interesting core. I mean, I know what I always think about when I think about that thing. But what is that when you think about that interesting core?

**Kelly:** Well, so for me with Saving Mr. Banks, the thing that fascinated me mainly about it was our relationships with our parents and the kind of adults that we turn into because of them. And then with Fifty Shades of Grey I was really fascinated with the character of Christian Grey and the fact that he’s an abused child and that uses… — And is, again, a tale of redemption, in which he fails. But that he uses his physicality to try to redeem himself.

And I actually think that’s a really, really interesting thing.

**Craig:** Yeah, you know, I love that. I was talking earlier at an earlier thing about the idea of theme and how it just seems to me it makes it easier to write these things. That it suddenly isn’t so much about plot. I mean, Looper is a great example, too, of a movie that at first blush is just — it’s all plot. You’re struggling to follow your plot. You know, not in a bad way. In a good way. It’s a real great puzzle. But in the end we care because of that theme, that emotional core. I think that’s great.

And it’s funny that you say, because it’s so obvious in Saving Mr. Banks. A very emotional movie. But Fifty Shades of Grey, I wouldn’t have expected that it’s actually about childhood issues.

**Kelly:** Yeah.

**Craig:** And childhood. Well, good, now I’ll see it.

**Kelly:** Good.

**John:** But I want to get to this topic of theme, because this is another thing that came up on another panel that I was on. That sense of, Rian’s movies certainly, and I think the movies that I’m proudest of that I’ve worked on, there’s this kind of fractal quality to it. They’re thematically whole enough that you could take any one scene from them and cut it out and like put it in nice fertile soil and it would grow into a shape of that movie.

Like genetically it’s all part of one consistent thing. And that’s a thing I definitely find in your films is that they’re all of one piece and there’s a central idea, a central thematic idea that is whole. And I find it very hard to start writing until I kind of know what that is. If I don’t have some touchstone to go back to, like this is what the movie feels like, this is what the movie is, it’s very hard to do that.

And, yet, certainly the three of us, and you to a degree, you really don’t write for other people very often. You don’t go onto other movies. But the three of us will end up in situations where a movie is in production or is getting close to production and you have to come in and write as somebody else and help.

**Craig:** And help.

**John:** And that’s a challenging thing, too. So, we talked about this a bit at breakfast, but what is it like for you to come into a project that you did not originate but you needed to help out. What is that decision process for you?

**Kelly:** I don’t do it often. I really don’t do it often. And most of the time I’ll do it because it’s a friend of mine or something, so the two movies, I helped out on Bronson and I helped out on Mad Max because Tom Hardy is a friend of mine and I know how to work with him. And, also, who doesn’t want to work George Miller? I mean, that’s just amazing.

And I will really only go and fix something if I really, really know that I know how to do that. So, I do it very rarely. I’ve done one this year. I do like one a year, that I’ll go in and help. And normally it’s because it’s a friend and I know how to do it. But most of the time I say no.

**John:** Craig, what do you like when you go into a project that needs your help? What’s the conversation in your head?

**Craig:** I never think about — if I do that it’s not about helping the project. It’s about helping a human being. It’s very, very hard to make a movie. And I am so empathetic to a director, a writer, an actor, anyone who is adrift and confused and scared because they’re not on firm ground.

More than anything, I just want to help them. I want to help them, mostly the director. I feel like the director is the person — If you can help the director, you will help everyone else. They’re the ones that have to do that day’s work. And so I try and help them. And it’s impossible to come in and mimic other people’s voices. You can only write what you can write. But if you listen to what they need and help a person, generally speaking you’re okay.

**John:** Well, and I think that listening is the most crucial thing. Usually when a movie is in crisis, it’s often not really about the script. It’s about the personalities of the people involved. And you were brought in because you are a voice of reason who can get people to actually do the things they need to do to show up, to get out of their trailer, to get on the plane, to take that next step, and to sort of talk through things and figure out how we can make this movie together and what this movie ultimately is.

**Craig:** Sometimes I would go and just hold Rian. And that’s all he needed.

**Rian:** Like Temple Grandin, you are my cow squeezer. It’s true.

**Kelly:** [laughs]

**John:** One of the things I’ve found is that often I will enter into these situations where there are a lot of strong personalities with strong opinions. And I find myself in this game of listening to their strong opinions and their ideas, which are kind of genuinely crazy, and have to maintain eye contact and nod and answer, “Well, that’s one way you could go. That’s a way. That’s a way we could go.”

And I kind of thought that might be a fun thing for us to do right now is to talk through potential movies and doing this. And so this is not going to be scary for either one of you.

**Kelly:** Rian, he’s going to make us improvise.

**Rian:** Yeah. This doesn’t sound scary at all. Does it? Does it Kelly?

**Kelly:** Should we leave?

**Rian:** Yes!

**John:** So, what I’d like each of you guys to do, you can participate as much as you want, is think of a movie that you would like Craig and I to be coming in to help out on. You guys think of a movie. And then we have an audience member named Megan. Megan, can you come up here? Everyone, let’s give applause for Megan. Thank you very much.

What Megan has done is in these two envelopes —

**Craig:** You can’t stop him.

**John:** You can’t stop me.

**Rian:** I was told there would be no math.

**Craig:** [laughs]

**John:** In these two envelopes are some ideas that a producer, a director, a star, a big movie star, Will Smith, might have had about the movie that Craig and I have been assigned to work on, to rewrite, to help out on.

**Craig:** As a team?

**John:** We can be a team or we can be apart? Do you want to be a team?

**Craig:** Are we competing for a job?

**John:** Yes. We’re competing for a job.

**Craig:** Oh, okay. Now I’m into it.

**John:** Rian, you’re more scared, so do you want envelope one or two?

**Rian:** I’ll take two.

**John:** Okay. Give him envelope two. Kelly, what movie should I be going into to work on? Any movie at all. It can be a remake of something. What movie do you want to do?

**Rian:** Okay. I want you to do a reboot of Goonies.

**John:** Actually, I don’t know Goonies well enough, so give me —

**Rian:** Oh, for god’s sake.

**Craig:** No, I totally know that. Can I do it?

**John:** Craig can do it.

**Rian:** Wow, right? Really?

**John:** Goonies are good enough for Craig.

**Craig:** I’ll take his job.

**Rian:** Okay. I want you to do, it’s a reboot of Goonies but it’s set on a colony on Mars.

**Craig:** Got it.

**John:** Now, I need you to open up that envelope and pick one of the things in there and say like, “Oh, and another thing is…” Add one of those elements.

**Rian:** [laughs]

**John:** [laughs]

**Rian:** Another thing is that in this future society all the grownups are clones of Jaden Smith. The actual Jaden Smith.

**Craig:** This is a great movie!

**Rian:** Yeah.

**Craig:** So, what am I supposed to do now?

**John:** Now run with that. Go with it. You got to wing it, Craig.

**Craig:** This is what I would actually do in this situation?

**John:** Yes. This is what you need to do in this situation.

**Craig:** Here’s what I would actually do. Okay, got it. You want to do a reboot of Goonies, which I think is fantastic. I love Goonies. And talk about a move that’s ripe for a reboot. You know, it’s sort of set in the eighties, but it’s universal. It’s children on a treasure hunt. That’s so exciting. With bad guys that are old fashioned bad guys, but they’re funny bad guys. And that dude, you know, that’s all great.

Here’s what I think we’ve got to really talk about. Mars. And Jaden Smith.

**Rian:** What about my son do you want to…?

**Craig:** Mr. Smith. Sir. My feeling is you get one great thing to build a movie around. It’s confusing to people if you try and build a movie around three great things. That’s three movies all smashed into one. Well, here are three great things. Goonies.

**Rian:** You are so good!

**Craig:** Mars. And Jaden. You don’t want to wear a hat, on a hat, on a hat. I say go Goonies. Maybe Mars. Hold back Jaden. Like a right hook for the sequel. Like a right hook for the sequel.

**Rian:** [laughs]

**Craig:** Did I get the job.

**Rian:** That’s my guy. I’m sold.

**Craig:** Yeah!

**John:** Awesome.

**Rian:** Let’s do this. I’m in.

**Kelly:** Yes!

**John:** Well done. Now, Kelly Marcel, do you have a movie that you would like me to talk about rebooting, remaking, working on?

**Kelly:** I’d like you to go in and fix and Waterworld.

**John:** Oh, absolutely. Done. I’m set.

**Kelly:** Using Charlize Theron.

**John:** I can’t imagine how she got entered into the mix.

**Kelly:** And, I’m not joking.

**John:** Ah, yes. Yes.

**Kelly:** And you have to incorporate Verizon mobile phones.

**John:** Fantastic. So, some backstory. This actually happened on the second Charlie’s Angels. There were Cingular cell phones that we had to get Cingular cell phones somewhere into the movie.

So, Charlize Theron and Waterworld.

**Kelly:** And Verizon.

**John:** And Verizon. Well, here is what is so fantastic about Waterworld is that it’s a world covered with water.

**Kelly:** Ha!

**John:** And it’s one of those titles that it’s so self-explanatory. It’s a water world, so you already know what that’s like. And everyone loves the ocean and it’s nothing but ocean from top to bottom. All the way through the movie. And so that’s going to be fantastic.

**Kelly:** [laughs]

**John:** [laughs] You have this civilization that is so primal and yet there are echoes of a previous civilization. For example, you could find a Verizon cell phone someplace and not know what it was because that was a previous technology. But what if you got that cell phone to work. And that is the beacon that is leading you to a promise land. That cell phone, you’re triangulating from the cell phone to some dry land.

**Craig:** Yup.

**Kelly:** Yeah.

**John:** That is fantastic. Now, the villain of this piece kind of needs to be Charlize Theron. Because Charlize Theron as like the evil mermaid queen is kind of unstoppable. Because we know she’s strong, we know she’s sexual, but you know you don’t want to cross Charlize Theron.

**Kelly:** Yeah. You don’t.

**John:** You just don’t want to cross Charlize Theron. So, I think it’s an opportunity to go from the world, the surface, to really dig deeper into woeful terrain of Waterworld by adding Charlize Theron.

**Kelly:** This is the best Waterworld ever.

**John:** Thank you.

**Craig:** Wow.

**John:** So, Craig was terrified of this idea and begged me not to do it.

**Craig:** Well, it just seems to me that we’ve convinced them screenwriting is basically a bunch of bullshit.

**John:** No. I would say that the profession of screenwriting, the profession of being in those rooms and saying, yes, is often that though. Because you and I have both in situations where we had to say, “Uh-huh?” And then you leave the room and you’re like, What just happened?

**Craig:** Yeah. It is true that you’re never allowed to make this face in a meeting. So, you get really good at figuring out how to say no to things while it looks like you’re saying yes. “Absolutely.” And then you start to slide it here, or slide it there.

No, not that is absolutely true. There is a skill to that, but it’s far less important than actually being a good writer. I’ve never met Charlie Kaufman, but I’ve listened to him speak. I can’t imagine that he doesn’t go — but he’s so good that it doesn’t really matter.

**John:** Yeah. That panicked gasp face. For the people who are actually listening to the podcast and don’t see Craig’s face, if you can imagine sort of like a fish that got hit really hard. That’s the face Craig is making right now.

**Rian:** Just Google Image any promotional image of Craig and you’ll see it basically there.

**John:** That slack-jawed, What the hell is this? What the hell was that?

**Craig:** This dumb confusion.

**John:** Yes. But this kind of, bad ideas happen a lot. And sometimes your skill at getting the job or like making the train stay on the tracks is to listen through those bad ideas and eventually get people back onto a track that is useful and helpful and will somehow lead to a movie.

**Craig:** Yes. I suspect that many of these folks, oh, should we do questions or should we do One Cool Things?

**John:** Let’s do our One Cool Things and then do some questions.

**Craig:** Okay, do you guys have One Cool Thing?

**John:** We warned you of this.

**Craig:** Rian, you’re made of nothing but One Cool Things.

**Rian:** Wow.

**John:** Also for people who are listening to this on the podcast, they don’t realize that Rian Johnson looks nothing like your expectation of Rian Johnson because he had Lasik.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** And so when I saw you at the airport, like I associate you with glasses. I associate you as being the villain in something, like the German villain in some sort of spy movie. And now —

**Craig:** And now you look like the German villain in a serial killer movie.

**John:** Yeah. You’ve changed everything. Rian Johnson, do you have a One Cool Thing for us?

**Rian:** One Cool Thing that’s out there that I would point? Anything. You know, actually I did a time travel panel this morning and I was reminded of a terrific little time travel movie that I think not a ton of people have seen called Timecrimes. And it’s a fantastic little jewel of a time travel movie. So, that’s my One Cool Thing. Go look up a movie called Timecrimes.

And I’m not going to say a thing about it except you won’t be disappoint.

**Craig:** Very cool.

**John:** Great. Timecrimes. Kelly?

**Craig:** Kelly?

**Kelly:** You can’t be a writer unless you read a lot. And I often am looking for inspiration, but I don’t want to like sit down with a huge book. So, there’s this brilliant website called Letters of Note. You might know it. Lots of letters from historical people, beautifully written, so it’s really nice to just have a quick read sometimes in the middle of the day when you’re stuck and you need to distract your brain. So, go there. It’s great.

**John:** Very cool. My One Cool Thing is a knife. Craig always mocks me for my One Cool Things, but they’re actually things I found incredibly useful. When I was at USC for film school I got paired up with this roommate named Nick Sarantakes who is lovely. He was like a history grad student and we have not spoken since that whole time.

But the thing is he had a really good knife, like a utility knife for the kitchen. And I kind of stole it. I kind of just took it with me when we were done. And it’s been my knife for this whole time but it broke and I had to replace this knife. So, this is the knife I found which I highly recommend to people: the Victorinox 40003 Wavy Edge Utility Knife with 4-3/4? Blade.

**Craig:** Do you see what I deal with?

**John:** Kelly Marcel is so cool that she has that same knife.

**Kelly:** I have that knife.

**John:** So people think you need a big, fancy shelf knife.

**Craig:** No one thinks that!

**John:** You do. You also need a knife that’s just the right size for like digging through vegetables and doing stuff. It’s the best knife. And you feel like you could…

**Kelly:** Kill someone with it.

**John:** Defend yourself with it. Yeah. You really could kill someone easily.

**Craig:** Yeah, Martha Stewart, hmm.

**John:** Craig Mazin. Your One Cool Thing?

**Craig:** Well, my One Cool Thing is sort of an — I’m attempting to create a business out of two people that run their own business that aren’t in business together. But I just wish that they were in business together. So, I’m creating a Voltron of people that don’t know each other. And I think I’ve mentioned both of these individually in the past maybe in One Cool Things.

But Kent Tessman is here. I saw Kent somewhere. There he is. Kent is the author of Fade In which is a fantastic screenwriting program. I use it. I find it to be vastly superior to all the other offerings out there, and cheaper, except for the ones that are free which I don’t like. And so he has this great product. There are also the guys here that do Writer Duet, which they’ve actually — I don’t know if the Writer Duet guys are here, but they’ve really advanced that thing.

You know, there’s the CollaboWriter or the or the Script-o-share, whatever, that just does not work unless, I don’t know, you happen to have a dedicated IP at your house and you understand how to open UCP ports or nonsense like that.

So, this thing actually works. It allows two people in two locations using a browser. And I just thought, wow, what if they created one company together and just destroyed all the other companies. Because mostly I’m interested in destruction.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** So, anyway, you guys should totally talk about that, smashing your company together and then having a program that you could write and then automatically upload and share and collaborate with someone else via the internet in real time and then automatically save back down to your computer.

I mean, anybody can get a knife!

**John:** Ah-ha!

**Craig:** That is unique. So, that’s my One Cool Thing.

**John:** Hooray! Because we are going to forget to do this, standard boilerplate here. If you have questions for me or Craig in normal time, short ones are great on Twitter. I’m @johnaugust. He is…

**Craig:** @clmazin.

**John:** And we will try to answer those questions. But these people are also on the Twitter. What’s yours?

**Kelly:** @MissMarcel.

**John:** @MissMarcel.

**Rian:** @rianjohnson.

**John:** And if you have longer questions for me or Craig, ask@johnaugust.com is the place to go.

This podcast and all future podcasts are at johnaugust.com, but even better on iTunes, so you can subscribe. Click subscribe. That’s great. Leave us a comment there, that’s fantastic.

We also will be having new t-shirts which we will be announcing next week. So, you will see that there are new t-shirts and they are in a color that you would not expect and I think you will enjoy them.

But this is the point of the podcast that I love so much because it’s questions. And so what I think might be best for questions is if you raise your hand and we will call on you. If anyone has a question for — the radical choice that we’re making! If you have a question for any of us here —

**Craig:** And the usual, can I make my usual disclaimer about questions?

Your question must be a question. Your question must not contain you pitching your material. Your question must end in a reasonable amount of time.

**John:** Yeah, so a good way to think about it is maybe there are 60 seconds that are going to be involving your question and our answers, so the shorter your question, the longer your answer. And I see a hand back there. Sir.

(NOTE: The questions themselves were inaudible and cut from the podcast.)

**Craig:** Sure. What notes that we get stand out as ones that we probably ought to reject. Is there such a thing?

**Kelly:** All of them.

**Craig:** [laughs] Tough. Tough.

**John:** Tough.

**Kelly:** I’m joking. Do them.

**Craig:** Consistently insane.

**John:** In general you need to figure out who the most important person is and do the notes of the most important person if they’re not going to destroy the project and the person actually has the right vision for what it’s going to be. The challenge I’ve found is something you get conflicting notes from multiple sources. And if you can get them to sort of create one set of notes, then they will fight amongst each other and resolve those issues so that you don’t have to resolve those issues for them. You can address one set of notes rather than ten sets of notes.

**Craig:** I don’t have any particular criteria other than this: if I think the note is stupid, I’m not going to do it. If I think the note is insightful, and smart, and will help me, even if the note starts to put me down a path of potential improvement that isn’t even suggested by the note, then I will listen to it. It’s simply for me. I’m very selfish about it. Will that note help me make a better story. There’s no particular kind of note that I reject offhand.

Rian? You don’t get notes.

**Rian:** I don’t get notes!

**Craig:** Yes, Rian doesn’t know what a note is. A note is a comment.

**Rian:** Oh?

**Craig:** That’s given to us.

**John:** Another question from this audience. You sir in the front.

**Rian:** Yeah, I…

**Craig:** Can you explain it? Very briefly.

**Rian:** The movie Primer? So, Primer is a micro-budget time travel movie made by a friend of mine, Shane Carruth, who is a tremendous director, he made a movie recently called Upstream Color which was one of my favorite movies of the past year. It was tremendous.

Primer is — we were just talking about it this morning actually. I’m a huge fan of Primer. I think that it’s often characterized as being a movie that dives head first into just the pure intricacies of time travel. And it does do that, but it does that and carries that through to such a pure extent that by the end of it it’s just this tangled mass of complexities and it becomes this cloud of white noise almost in the third act that’s impossible to follow.

And to me, from just my own personal experience — I’m not speaking for Shane — but for me, that’s kind of the point of it. And it gets you to this place where all the complexities of time travel just become this beautiful hum. And all you’re left with is kind of the base emotional discord between these two friends that have launched them into this rivalry.

I think it’s a tremendous film. I absolutely love it.

**John:** Right here, sir.

[Then]

I often do outline if I have to give it to somebody else. If I have to be able to talk through the whole moving with somebody else in a detailed way, I will do that outline so I can have a way to discuss them. And I’ve done some television pilots. And in television you’re required to outline. And I’ve always fought it and then loved it when I was done because you actually — I knew what it was and when you actually started writing it was actually really simple to write. But when I’m writing for myself I don’t always outline. I won’t do character bios unless it’s important.

What I will sometimes do is have characters just start talking to each other in scenes that don’t have anything to do with the actual plot of the movie, just so I can hear what the character’s voices are.

Craig? You outline.

**Craig:** Yes. I do. Sometimes I outline for sort of the same reason you do, to make things go easier for me. There are multiple people involved and I frankly don’t want any of them to be able to say — well, they’ll say, “Yes, great.” And then you’ll do the script and they’ll say, “Well why was that there?” Because we all agreed on it and, remember, here it is in paper.

But for me really I like just note cards. I like real simple note cards to just help me organize my thoughts. I do like to know how the movie begins and ends. I like to know how the character changes in relationship to the theme over the course of the movie. I don’t write character bios. I start to feel like that becomes Dungeons & Dragons stuff. It’s a little goofy.

I don’t want, frankly, a whole bunch of stuff that I’m not intending to impart to the audience. If I’m intending to impart it to the audience, I don’t need to write the bio. I need to figure out how to impart it.

**John:** Kelly?

**Kelly:** We had this discussion this morning and to Craig’s horror I told him that I don’t outline.

**Craig:** Argh!

**Kelly:** But what that results is really, really over-long scripts that I then have to cut down. And I probably should outline. And I think that’s probably the right way to do it. So, I just start on page one and then my characters tell me who they are, but I do end up with a really messy, shitty first draft and then have to go back in. So a lot of my work is rewriting.

**John:** Rian?

**Rian:** I outline. I’d say 80% of the process for the first draft for me is outlining. And the outline just gets more and more defined and concentrated. And then the very last thing I do when I know the entire thing is I start typing, but then I end up with an over-long shitty first draft that I have to cut way down. So, it’s probably the wrong way to do it and you should probably not outline.

**Kelly:** [laughs]

**John:** Right there. Yes, you.

**Craig:** Ooh! Good question!

**John:** I’m going to restate the question for microphones. Did Disney ask you to do any changes to Saving Mr. Banks based on their involvement once they came on?

**Kelly:** Do you know what? We were incredibly lucky and I think it’s because there was an already an existing draft and it wasn’t something that we developed at the studio. It was pretty solid when they got it. So, it was very difficult to change. If you start pulling a thread, the whole thing is going to come apart.

I don’t think John Lee and I really ever felt the hand of Disney on our shoulder. They were pretty amazing. They opened up their archives to us. I mean, Walt Disney drinks and smokes in this movie and it’s a Disney film. So, personally I think they were incredibly brave and they were very, very true to the original script which Craig has read and seen the finish version. They’re pretty much the same.

**Craig:** Absolutely. John shot the script. And he did a great job. But it was your script, your structure. It’s a very particular kind of structure that’s there and the scenes are there. And that moment, that weird moment that made me cry is there.

**Kelly:** Yeah.

**Craig:** That apparently just made me cry. I told her, “You know what made me cry?” And I thought she would go, “Oh, yeah, yeah, a lot of people say that.” And nobody. Apparently I’m the only one. She’s like, “Why would you cry at that?”

**Kelly:** So just a big girl.

**Craig:** [mimicking Kelly’s accent] So weird. You’re a weird little girl. Yeah. Stupid.

**John:** Right here in the front row.

**Male Audience Member:** Kelly, did Disney request any changes to Fifty Shades of Grey?

**Kelly:** Ha-ha! They just said please, please don’t do this.

**Craig:** [laughs]

**John:** [laughs] Is Disney excited about the fact that you’re writing Fifty Shades of Grey?

**Kelly:** No!

**John:** It must be odd that you are doing this Saving Mr. Banks, which is a Disney film about Walt Disney, and the next thing that is on your bio sheet is this project.

**Kelly:** Is porn.

**John:** Is porn. Yeah.

**Kelly:** Right. They, you know what? They were pretty cool about it. They were very congratulatory when I signed onto it. But we premiered Banks in London on Sunday and it was a very difficult process going down that red carpet and constantly being asked about Fifty Shades because it’s huge, but we’re at this family-friendly Disney film and, you know, I can’t talk about it. So, we really tried to make sure that I never talk about Fifty Shades in the same sentence as Saving Mr. Banks, which I just did.

**John:** Well done!

**Craig:** And we got it!

**John:** Way in the back, so speak up load.

[Then]

A great question. With so many choices of what we could use to entertain ourselves, what jumps out at you that makes you say this is a thing I need to actually spend time on?

**Rian:** Well, I’ve actually been going through a thing lately where I’ve been, you know, with all the options on Netflix and iTunes and everything you can watch at home, I’ve really been pushing myself to just get out there and go to the theater more. Not so much for the experience of the big screen and the technical stuff, but because if I’m at home on the couch watching something, it requires a Herculean effort at this point to not be distracted by something. To not have a second screen, or a phone, or to have something.

And I find increasingly a movie theater is the only place where the movie, no matter what the pace of it, has my full attention the entire time. And more and more I place a premium on that.

**John:** Craig?

**Craig:** For me it’s been defined largely by my children, because I like to — you know, I have a debt to my kids the way that my parents introduced films to me. I’m now in the phase where my son is 12 and my daughter is eight, where I can introduce films to them. And I get to enjoy them again. I get to show them Raiders of the Lost Ark. And I get to show them Jaws. And I get to deal with their weird Jaws insanity afterwards. Everything is Jaws and sharks, and sharks, and sharks, and sharks.

You know, my daughter, who is eight, is like, “Daddy, for Halloween I want to be like the half of the body, daddy.”

My son, I showed my son Raiders of the Lost Ark. My son looks just like my wife, who is very blonde and blue-eyed. And we were taking a walk and he goes, “Dad, I know what I want to be for Halloween. I want to be one of those guys from Raiders.”

And I was like, “What are you talking about? What guys?”

He goes, “You know, the guys with the uniforms.”

And I really thought long and hard about it because he would look so good, you know? And then I could just be back there, so he’d be up, ringing the doorbell, and I’d be back there like, “It’s okay, we’re Jewish.”

He doesn’t know. But now all of my choices that I make are really — so we do go to the theater a lot because I do want to go see movies with them and I want to experience them with them. And he keeps asking me, “Daddy, when I can see Godfather? When can I see Godfather?”

And I’m like, I don’t know what a good age is for Godfather. But you know what will ensue after that. So, that’s what grabs my attention. It’s no longer about me.

I mean, I still go and see movies, of course, and I love movies. And I just did a whole big crazy Breaking Bad binge watch that was awesome. And I met Vince Gilligan. I got my picture with Vince Gilligan. Ooh! Kelly and I were standing there. We were peeing. It was great. And Rian Johnson directed…

**Rian:** You’re creeping me out a little bit. [laughs]

**Craig:** But, anyway, so that’s what draws my attention. My kids.

**John:** Yeah, similar to Craig, I have an eight-year-old daughter. And I realized that like, Oh, she doesn’t know what Star Trek is. Like she’d already watched all the Star Wars and we’ve talked on the podcast about how she can’t distinguish the good Star Wars from the bad Star Wars. Like, oh my god, taste! And I don’t know how you teach her that.

But she also had no idea what Star Trek was. And so I was like, Netflix! And so the original series of Star Trek is there. And so I could sort of curate sort of her introduction to what Star Trek is and what that world is. And the decision to start with Kirk and that whole crew in the original series and then move to later ones. You start with later ones where the world is not as incredibly sexist and that.

So, it’s been fascinating to sort of figure out how you introduce Star Wars to a kid. And so that’s been a great afternoon because really most of parenthood is figuring out like, God, how do I pass the time? And Star Trek is an amazing way —

**Craig:** There’s other parts to it. I mean…

**John:** Well, yes, there are some other good things. There’s driving. It’s been amazing for me to be able to rewatch something that was so important to me in my youth with somebody who is experiencing it for the first time. So, that’s a great thing about Netflix in our life.

Anything you’d like to?

**Kelly:** Like Rian, I’ve just been trying to force myself to get out. I’ve been doing a lot of rewriting in London this year, so actually I’ve been going to the theater a lot and watching live performance which has been kind of amazing and made me want to go back to my theater roots a bit.

**Craig:** You run a theater, don’t you?

**Kelly:** Yes. Me and Tom Hardy. We run a theater in London.

**Craig:** What does that mean to run a theater?

**Kelly:** We don’t do anything. [laughs]

**Craig:** You don’t do the curtains and the — ?

**Kelly:** We’re supposed to be putting plays on, but we’re a little bit busy.

**Craig:** Right. Very good.

**John:** All right. We have time for two more questions, so I’m going to pick you, sir, as the first question.

**Craig:** Yeah, every time.

**John:** Yeah, that was Monster Apocalypse and Pacific Rim. I just turned in the draft of Monster Apocalypse for Tim Burton, which is a DreamWorks movie. And Stacey Snider called, who runs DreamWorks, and says, “There’s this movie Pacific Rim that is about giant robots fighting monsters. And it’s the same thing. Like we cannot do your movie.” And she was completely honest and upfront about sort of like we can’t be the second movie and it’s just not going to work. It’s this Armageddon/Deep Impact. Sorry.

And it was heartbreaking. So, the answer is yes. Although what I would generally say to most people, that’s a rare occasion. And so often you’ll see something in the trades that sort of sounds like your movie, but it really is nothing like your movie, at all. It’s just like there’ s a ghost in it, but that’s all the similar thing to it.

So, don’t stop just because you saw an announcement about something, because most of those movies never happen. Most of the situations, it just seems similar because it’s one sentence in Variety.

**Rian:** For a long time when I was writing Looper and getting it together there was a project that was at Disney forever called Gemini Man, which every time I would tell anyone about Looper they would say, “Oh, you know about Gemini Man, though, right?”

But, yeah, it just speaks to your thing of you never know what’s going to happen. I think that project got very close to getting made, but it didn’t end up being a problem.

**Craig:** And sometimes these movies come out and there’s two movies where they take over the White House. And there’s two movies that are animated about ants. And there are two movies about volcanoes exploding. And the truth is you do — you can get caught up in the, Oh, my idea! And they occupy their own space.

I mean, how many movies have we seen of a certain kind? How many car racing movies are there now? But they occupy their own space. So, it’s fine. I don’t worry about stuff like that. If it happens, it happens. What are you going to do?

**John:** Cool. Last question right here.

**Craig:** Cue music.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** [sings] “You’ll never find another love like mine.”

Of course. I certainly — I’ve been learning from John for a long time. The podcast itself probably isn’t where I learn as much, although when we talk about craft things I feel like every time we talk I get a different perspective.

It’s easy for us to just keep falling into our own rut, but hearing how other people do things is always going to influence, always. But really all of my writer friends, I have lots of writer friends, they all influence me and they all influence me through my work, I’m sorry, through their work.

And I’m not emulating anybody, but I learn something every time I see a movie. I learned something when I saw your movie. I learned something, god knows I learned a lot when I saw your movie. I mean, so I’m like a little sponge constantly picking up things.

I’ve watched all that Breaking Bad stuff and it actually really — watching Breaking Bad, I don’t write TV, but it was so cinematic. And I just felt, boy, I’ve really got to remember to be more cinematic. These little things. But, yeah, I’ve learned a ton from you.

**John:** Yeah. I’ve learned a ton from Craig, too. I rag on Craig a lot. So, people who listen to the show —

**Craig:** You do?

**Kelly:** That’s sexy.

**John:** Yeah, maybe a little bit.

**Craig:** You mean, privately? [laughs]

**John:** Exactly. Yeah, off mic.

**Craig:** When we’re not together?

**John:** Yeah, I’m throwing you under many busses.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** No. I have learned a lot from Craig. And so part of the reason why my impetus was to go to Craig to co-host the show was that Craig knew a lot more about sort of business/technical/right stuff, WGA stuff for sure, because he’s really good at that stuff.

But I’ve been surprised how disciplined he is about the actual craft of screenwriting and sort of that process. And getting the work done and being professional. And that has been a great education. Because really ultimately, unlike every other job in making movies or making television, writers are alone. And so we’re alone at a computer. There is no one else to talk to about the things that we’re doing.

And so to have weekly conversation with Craig, who is trying to do the same things I’m doing, is incredibly therapeutic. And so it’s been a remarkable sort of hundred and some episodes to talk through that stuff, too.

**Craig:** Isn’t that nice? Aw…

**John:** And, Craig, whenever I’m like at all nice to Craig, he gets all mushy.

**Craig:** It’s so nice.

**John:** I gave Craig a hug last night.

**Craig:** I know! I freaked out. I was like, Who is this?! Because it’s like, I mean, he really is my Vulcan friend. And I’m like McCoy, I guess. McCoy was always the worst because everybody finally would just say, “McCoy, shut up.”

And he’d be like, “All right!” And that’s me. But you’re like — he’s Spock. And so when Spock hugs you you’re like, What the…?!

**John:** Something wrong has happened.

**Craig:** This is so cool.

**Kelly:** It was really cute.

**John:** So much right has happened today. So, guys thank you so much for coming to Scriptnotes Live here.

**Craig:** Thank you, Austin.

**John:** This was awesome. Thank you. Thank our guests.

FOLLOWING APPLAUSE

**Craig:** Thank you. I needed that. Because I didn’t snort four pounds of coke like you did, apparently. What the hell?

**John:** Whoa, whoa, I’ve got energy. And…

Links:

* The [20th Annual Austin Film Festival](http://www.austinfilmfestival.com/aff/live/)
* Rian Johnson [on IMDb](http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0426059/) and his [blog](http://www.rcjohnso.com/) and [Twitter](https://twitter.com/rianjohnson)
* Kelly Marcel [on IMDb](http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2813876/) and [Twitter](https://twitter.com/MissMarcel)
* [Saving Mr. Banks](http://movies.disney.com/saving-mr-banks) opens this December
* [The Black List](http://blcklst.com/)
* [Timecrimes](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timecrimes) on Wikipedia
* [Letters of Note](http://www.lettersofnote.com/)
* The [Victorinox 40003 Wavy Edge Utility Knife with 4-3/4″ Blade](http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000I4RGG4/?tag=johnaugustcom-20) on Amazon
* [Fade In](http://www.fadeinpro.com/) and [Writer Duet](https://writerduet.com/) should collaborate
* [Primer](http://erbpfilm.com/film/primer), and [on Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primer_(film))
* Craig [met Vince Gilligan](https://twitter.com/clmazin/status/394199517169319936/photo/1)
* [Outro](http://johnaugust.com/2013/scriptnotes-the-outros) by Scriptnotes listener Lawrence Fehler

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Newsletter

Inneresting Logo A Quote-Unquote Newsletter about Writing
Read Now

Explore

Projects

  • Aladdin (1)
  • Arlo Finch (27)
  • Big Fish (88)
  • Birdigo (2)
  • Charlie (39)
  • Charlie's Angels (16)
  • Chosen (2)
  • Corpse Bride (9)
  • Dead Projects (18)
  • Frankenweenie (10)
  • Go (29)
  • Karateka (4)
  • Monsterpocalypse (3)
  • One Hit Kill (6)
  • Ops (6)
  • Preacher (2)
  • Prince of Persia (13)
  • Shazam (6)
  • Snake People (6)
  • Tarzan (5)
  • The Nines (118)
  • The Remnants (12)
  • The Variant (22)

Apps

  • Bronson (14)
  • FDX Reader (11)
  • Fountain (32)
  • Highland (74)
  • Less IMDb (4)
  • Weekend Read (64)

Recommended Reading

  • First Person (87)
  • Geek Alert (151)
  • WGA (162)
  • Workspace (19)

Screenwriting Q&A

  • Adaptation (65)
  • Directors (90)
  • Education (49)
  • Film Industry (489)
  • Formatting (128)
  • Genres (89)
  • Glossary (6)
  • Pitches (29)
  • Producers (59)
  • Psych 101 (118)
  • Rights and Copyright (96)
  • So-Called Experts (47)
  • Story and Plot (170)
  • Television (165)
  • Treatments (21)
  • Words on the page (237)
  • Writing Process (177)

More screenwriting Q&A at screenwriting.io

© 2026 John August — All Rights Reserved.