• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

John August

  • Arlo Finch
  • Scriptnotes
  • Library
  • Store
  • About

Search Results for: residuals

Scriptnotes, Episode 603: Billion Dollar Advice, Transcript

July 26, 2023 Scriptnotes Transcript

The original post for this episode can be found [here](https://johnaugust.com/2023/billion-dollar-advice).

**John August:** Hey, this is John. Heads up that today’s episode has just a little bit of swearing in it. Hello and welcome. My name is John August.

**Craig Mazin:** My name is Craig Mazin.

**John:** This is Episode 603 of Scriptnotes, a podcast about screenwriting and things that are interesting to screenwriters.

Craig, you and I both know that it’s never been easy to be extraordinarily wealthy in America. You monopolize the railroads, you’re called a robber baron. You perform a few hostile takeovers on public companies, bankrupt them after laying off thousands of workers, and somehow you’re the bad guy.

**Craig:** Yeah, I know. Isn’t that a shame?

**John:** It is. Today’s billionaires I think maybe have it even worse, because they get dragged on Twitter for buying Twitter and ruining Twitter. Orcas have finally learned how to capsize their yachts. Today, I thought maybe we could offer some guidance for the billionaires and other folks who are looking for a safe and tranquil place to put their money, which is the film and television industry. This episode is for the dreamers, the builders, the doers, the absurdly rich. It’s also a history lesson in the way things used to work and could maybe work again, with independent studios making things for distributors. To help us look into all of this, we have a very, very special guest, Craig, Akela Cooper.

**Craig:** Fantastic. Hi, Akela.

**Akela Cooper:** Hello. Hi!

**Craig:** Hey!

**John:** Hey! Akela Cooper, you are a writer for film and TV. Credits include Malignant, Star Trek: Strange New Worlds, Luke Cage, and the breakout hit M3GAN.

**Craig:** That’s pronounced me and three-gan.

**Akela:** M-three-gan.

**John:** Me and three-gan.

**Akela:** M-three-gan.

**Craig:** M-three-gan. That is M-three-gan.

**John:** M-three-gan.

**Craig:** If I know one thing in this world, it’s that that movie would have done even better had it been pronounced M-three-gan. I think in some countries it may have been pronounced M-three-gan. Go on.

**Akela:** I was going to say, that’s one of those writer things, where it’s just like, no, you guys, it’s really Megan. At a certain point, I’m like, oh no, I have lost the narrative on this. It is M-three-gan.

**Craig:** It’s M-three-gan. It’s M-three-gan. There’s going to be M-four-gan. It’ll be M-three-ga-four-n. M-three-ga-four-n is what’s going to happen.

**John:** M-three-ga-four-n.

**Craig:** M-three-ga-four-n.

**John:** Akela Cooper, you are also a WGA captain, who I first met on the picket line in front of CBS. I was so excited to meet you. I think I gasped audibly, because I loved your movie. Your name I’d seen for a long time. I got to see you in person and shake your hand. Akela Cooper, welcome-

**Akela:** Thank you.

**John:** … to Scriptnotes.

**Akela:** I love that the picket line is just bringing people together. Even at the rally today, everyone was like, oh my god, I turned left, and I seen someone I haven’t seen in 10 years. I turned right and I seen someone I haven’t seen in five years. It’s like a writers reunion.

**Craig:** That’s what you think good news is. For me, I see somebody I haven’t seen in 10 years, I’m like, “Oh, no. I gotta go hide behind a very slender tree. I’m going to turn sideways and pray.”

**John:** Akela, we barely know each other. I mostly know you through your work. I was looking through IMDb, and I thought we might actually start with getting an origin story. I might guess your origin story just based on this really expensive credits list I see here of the things you’ve worked on. It feels like you worked your way up in a way that a bunch of our listeners are really aspiring to, because I look back over your 10-year arc. You’re starting off on, first credit I see a credit for is Tron: Uprising. Presumably, you were a staff writer. Was that really your first job?

**Akela:** That wasn’t my first first job. It was my first credit, which was animated. Shout-out to Christopher Mack at the Warner Bros Writers’ Workshop, may that rest in peace. Oh, wait, no, I had gotten staffed on V, the reboot of the ‘80s miniseries on ABC that went a season, and then actually, in between seasons I needed work. Chris Mack was like, “Hey, I know Disney is doing a Tron animated series. You want me to put you up for it?” “Yes.” I ended up getting a freelance actually.

That’s where I first met our lot coordinator, Bill Wolkoff, who was my boss on that. It was just the three of us in a room. There was another executive story editor who was on there. We broke this episode, and then I went off and I wrote it. Then years later, it aired. My staff writing job was on V. Unfortunately, I never got a credited episode on that, just because a whole lot of fuckery happened on that show.

**Craig:** I love that song. That’s my favorite Led Zeppelin song.

**John:** Akela, you bring up a really good point, because I misassumed that Tron: Uprising was your first job because a staff writer isn’t guaranteed a credit in IMDb or anywhere else for being a staff writer on a show. It’s only if you actually get an episode that you get a credit on that you’re necessarily going to show up there. You had a whole extra year or work before you show up in a public record for this.

From that point forward, I look through your credits here, you’re climbing that ladder. There’s a ladder. You’re climbing up it, because you go on to Grimm, Witches of East End, The 100, American Horror Story, Luke Cage, Avengers Assemble. Each of these steps, you are… I see you getting a story editor credit, which is the next rung up from staff writer. I see you getting a co-producer. I see you just rising up the ranks, supervising producer to co-AP. That’s sort of the dream process, right?

**Akela:** Yes.

**John:** You kept working up show after show. They’re all in a genre. They’re all very specific sci-fi, fantasy spaces. Was this by plan? Talk to us about how you’re moving from show to show.

**Akela:** It was by plan in that I wanted to hit that next level. As an elder millennial, I feel like I’m… Sadly, we all know this is what we’re fighting for now. I’m part of a last generation that was able to work my way up the ladder and learn each step of making a TV show as I went along. I certainly hope we win on those fronts, because I think we’re doing the next generation of writers a disservice by cutting them out of the process, as streaming has.

I was part of the CBS Writers’ Workshop and the Warner Bros Writers’ Workshop, and that’s what they told us. It’s assistant, and then hopefully you make it to the table and you become a staff writer.

Then traditionally in network you would have to do 22 episodes before the studio would bump you. On V, I had done 13. When I went to the next show, which I believe was Grimm, NBC was the one that was like, “You didn’t do 22, so we’re going to make you be staff writer all over again.” I had to do staff writer again. Then I did 22 episodes of Grimm. Then I got the story editor bump.

Just from there, I kept hitting those 22 episodes on the network side, and so that helped when I transitioned to streaming, like on Luke Cage, where at this point now I think it’s co-producer. I have the experience. You gotta give me that title.

As it was explained to me, you get the episodes, and then either the series is renewed and then you get a bump automatically in your contract, or if you go on to another show, it’s like, I’ve got all this experience behind me, you give me my bump.

There were some bumps along the way, because I do remember specifically for The 100, it was a difference of do you want the title or do you want the pay. I’m like, “You’re going to give me that fucking title, because I’ve earned it.” I actually ended up taking less pay just so I could get the title, because I knew I was going to need that title going forward, especially as a Black female writer in this business. I took the title over the money. Again, going from The 100 to Luke Cage, it helped.

**Craig:** That’s a good lesson right there in delayed gratification. Any time somebody offers you money or blank, take the or blank. There’s a reason they’re offering you money. It’s a trap. Just think it’s a trap every time, because you’re right, if you can hang on… I almost think they’re counting on people being desperate and taking the money instead, because yeah, once you get the higher title, yeah, you’re going to get more money starting next time, and then building off of that, more and more and more. Well chosen. Good on you.

**John:** The other choice I see that’s really smart here is you were not only doing television. You were also writing features this whole time through. Were you consciously working in long-form scripted, and were you always trying to make features in addition to this stuff, or were they opportunities that came up along the way? Because even before Malignant, you have Hell Fest, you have other stuff you were working on. What was your split there? You were doing TV, but you were also trying to do features?

**Akela:** I focused on TV. I ended up going to USC in the grad program, which at the time was feature-focused. Then I fell into TV. I loved TV, but I had no idea how it worked. Then I found out at USC. It’s like, this is how it works. I’m like, this is amazing. While I was focused on working my way up, I wasn’t really writing features. I was writing spec episodes. I was writing pilots. At a certain point I was also writing short stories, just to have something else in my quiver when they needed to send out samples.

It wasn’t until I got on Luke Cage that it’s like, okay, I think Luke Cage, I made co-producer of Season 1. It’s like, woo, I’ve made mid-level, which is huge. It’s a huge thing to get your foot in the door as staff writer. Then getting that bump is also huge. Then when you make it to mid-level, that’s when I was like, yeah, break out the Prosecco. At that point, I felt comfortable in that I had a body of produced work, so I didn’t have to write as many specs anymore. At that point, I was like, I’m not writing specs anymore. You can see that I’ve had episodes produced.

**John:** You weren’t writing spec television episodes, but then you could actually focus back on doing features, because everyone can always read a feature and say, oh, look at how good her writing is.

**Akela:** Yeah. It had been an itch that had been growing. It’s like, now that I have this time, and now that I am at this level in my TV career, let me go back and take some time to write features. While I was on Luke Cage, I had had two horror movie ideas that had been knocking around in my brain. I’m like, let me get these down on paper. I had a system where if the Luke Cage writers’ room started at 10 a.m., I would show up at 9 and then work for an hour before the room started, just on the outline and then eventually the script. I wrote two spec scripts that way while also working on Luke Cage. I would work at home after work as well, and sometimes on the weekends.

I went to my TV agent, ICM at the time. May that rest in peace. It got absorbed by CAA. I went to my TV agent and was like, “Hey, I’ve written some features, and I’d like to write movies also.” He introduced me to a wonderful agent on the feature side. Then he sent out those spec features. That led to a meeting at Atomic Monster. That worked out very well for me.

**John:** That’s awesome.

**Craig:** I love the fact that you were there… Anytime anyone, but particularly generations younger than John’s generation and my generation, anytime anybody is showing up early, working early, working on weekends, betting on themselves, I sing. I sing. It’s just wonderful. It’s wonderful to see, because it does pay off. It does, honestly. It’s just very exciting to hear somebody betting on themselves like that and then the way it pays off. Well done.

**Akela:** I actually knew the editor of Get Out. We’d met somewhere. I forget now. He had reached out, and it’s like, “Oh, she’s writing features now? I’m being brought on to direct this movie. Would she mind coming on board and doing a rewrite?” That’s how I got on Hell Fest.

**John:** I once had your work ethic, where I actually could get up early and do a thing. I don’t have it anymore. How did you keep energy in the tank to do this writing before your actual writing job? That to me is so tough.

**Craig:** She’s young, John. She hasn’t died inside like we have. Look at her. She’s vital.

**Akela:** Why thank you.

**John:** You’re not a teenager. You still have that young 20s energy, even a ways into your career.

**Akela:** I think I was mid-30s 2015. I am not good at math, but I think I was, because I’m 41 now. Elder millennial, as they say, or whatever the fuck they’ve designated us. They can never seem to land on anything.

**Craig:** Maybe we’ll take you. Maybe Gen X will just pick you up. You’re worth picking up.

**Akela:** At one point, I was part. It was the tail-end of Gen X. Then it’s like, no, we’re going to call you the Pepsi Generation. Then that didn’t stick. Then they forgot about us. Then millennial and Gen Z became a thing. It’s like, hey, what do we call the people between ’78 and ’83? Who the fuck knows?

**Craig:** That’s a pretty specific range there.

**Akela:** That also shifts. There are so many people who will be like, “No, it’s ’79 to ’84.” Wherever it is, I’m smack in the middle at ’81.

**Craig:** Wait a second. I have a question for you, Akela. Do you have children?

**Akela:** No.

**Craig:** There it is. There it is. There it is.

**John:** There it is.

**Craig:** That’s why she’s not dead inside.

**Akela:** As you can see behind me, Craig, I have a cat. I actually have two cats.

**Craig:** I was just guessing, based on the cat and the coolness behind you and the lack of just crap everywhere that belongs to children that put it there, even though this is mommy’s office and you told them not to go in there and they did anyway. John and I, as parents we are the worst about promoting parenthood, because all we ever do is talk about how kids are why we’re so tired. They just haul you out.

**Akela:** That is also where I get time.

**Craig:** Man, you just made one great decision after another, as far as I’m concerned.

**John:** I do look at what I see in your background of the Zoom here. Everything there is breakable by a child. That Predator statue-

**Craig:** Oh, gone.

**John:** Gone.

**Craig:** Gone.

**John:** Gone.

**Akela:** That’s Pumpkinhead.

**John:** Oh, it’s Pumpkinhead. Thank you. I couldn’t see it clearly.

**Craig:** It does look like Predator from here.

**Akela:** I have one of those too, but he is in storage right now. In the before times, when we had in-person offices in writers’ rooms, I have a box of all of my collectibles that are specifically for my office. My Predator is one of them.

**John:** I love it.

**Craig:** You’re a nerd?

**Akela:** Yes.

**Craig:** Love it.

**Akela:** Born and raised.

**Craig:** John and I are playing Dungeons and Dragons tonight, so you’re with your people.

**Akela:** I have played Dungeons and Dragons exactly once. I did have fun. It’s just like, hey, we’re going to do this campaign, and it’s going to be Sunday evening for four hours. It’s like, I wish I could, but no.

**Craig:** You just need to commit to that.

**Akela:** I’ve got a couple of people being like, “We’re going to do a one-shot at some point.”

**Craig:** Do one-shots. Exactly, do one-shots.

**John:** One-shots are perfect. That’ll be great. I want to talk to you about M3GAN, because I saw M3GAN in the theater with an audience who loved it to death. It’s just a fantastic movie and a fantastic ride. My question for you is, from its initial incarnation, did you know that tone was going to be there, that tone where it’s aware of its own absurdity and embracing it and also it’s going to have the jolts that you’re hoping for in a horror movie. When did the tone of it become clear?

**Akela:** The tone of it was Gerard. I wrote a straight horror movie.

**Craig:** Gerard Johnstone, the director?

**Akela:** Yes. The jolts and the scares, yes, those were intended. I’m happy a lot of them landed. The hilarious tone, that is Gerard’s New Zealand sense of humor. I was really, really happy when he was brought on, because it was a case of, I had seen Housebound when it was released on DVD, and I loved it. When the guys at Atomic Monster were like, “Hey, we found a director. It’s Gerard Johnstone,” I was like, “I know that guy. I saw his movie, and I liked it. Cool.” It’s one of those things where I didn’t have to go on IMDb and be like, who the fuck did they hire? He brought that sensibility. I was like, oh, wow, I love it. I love how we played together in that area, because he took what I wrote and then enhanced it in that way. It was so fun to see.

**John:** It’s always great when a writer has a happy director story, Craig.

**Craig:** It doesn’t happen frequently. Then again, so few films get made now, that one would hope that they’re all somehow happy. Can you talk us through the dance? It’s hard to write dancing. The M3GAN dance is astonishing. I feel like we’re buried in culture right now. There’s so much of it. It’s all noise, no signal. Then every now and then, something just pokes through in such a way that everyone goes, “Everybody, shut up and look at this!” In the trailer for M3GAN, when she starts dancing, there was just something about it. I’m curious how that kind of thing gets built in, even from the page, or whether it was on the page or now, and how that storytelling happens.

**Akela:** It was not. I love it. I love that it’s in there. It’s one of those things that writers are going to have to learn. You guys have dealt with production. On the feature side, when I was writing it, after I turned in the first draft, and I got notes from Atomic Monster and Blumhouse, the mandate was, “We cannot have M3GAN moving that much.” They didn’t know how they were going to build the doll and whether or not it was going to be practical or if it was going to be CG or what. It was like, no matter what, if I’m writing her moving, people are going to see dollar signs. I had to go back into the script and cut out “she runs” or she does this and she does that. It’s a lot of head movements. M3GAN will glance this way, and M3GAN will do that. I knew I could get away with that and-

**Craig:** Eyes.

**Akela:** Yeah, and her talking. As far as arms and limbs and doing all this, even the bully sequence, I wrote it like how Steven Spielberg had to visualize Jaws after Bruce the shark, which I took that name and gave it to Gemma’s first robot in honor of that. I wrote it that you would see her in quick flashes from the bully’s perspective. She would be behind a tree and then this and that.

When we cast an actress to actually physically be there, that just opened up a whole other world. I think it was a situation where, when they were doing location scouting, they really liked that office building, but then you get to that moment, and there’s this long hallway between M3GAN and David, and the question during production was like, how is she going to close that gap? It was like, what if she throws them off some way, somehow? It was like, okay, how is she going to do that? I believe Gerard said the idea of her dancing came to him at 3 a.m. in a dream.

**John:** Great.

**Craig:** Sometimes that works that way. Man, I wish we could show everyone that enjoys movies and television how often some of the things we love come out of the most mundane problem solving, not even problem solving of the romanticized version of how do we make this character interesting? It’s more like, we got to get the doll from here to there really quickly, in a way that makes logical sense, so that the guy down there doesn’t just go, “Bye.” What are we going to do? Then out of these things sometimes comes this fascinating magic.

**Akela:** I remember when I got to see a rough cut. It was a rough cut. They didn’t even have the ending on there. I was like, “What the hell?” Then I just started laughing with everybody else. I was like, “This is odd, but I think it works. Am I crazy? I think it works?”

**Craig:** Whoever the choreographer was, hats off, because I would watch it, and I don’t think my body could do that. There was something about the [indiscernible 00:20:25] that was just so bizarre. It’s interesting that you say that so much of the tone comes from the director. The movie to me only works insofar as I take it seriously. The fun parts are fun, and the campy parts are campy, but if there isn’t something real holding it all together, then it’s just not there. It’s just there’s nothing there. It’s a very ’80s movie in that regard. There were a lot of movies in the ’80s that were horror movies but funny, but horror movies. It was nice. It was such a great throwback to that era.

**Akela:** It was the same thing with Malignant. Obviously, when you’re writing, you’re going to put fun moments in there, because you don’t want it to be super dour. I had jokey moments and stuff like that, but the tone of M3GAN, yeah, that was Gerard looking, because he even hired his friend, who is an actor, is the cop who’s talking to Gemma and is like, “Yeah, that boy’s ear was ripped off and tossed far.” Then he starts laughing. It’s like, “I shouldn’t have done that.” That was an improv on the day. That was Gerard being like, “That was awesome. Let’s keep that.”

As far as Malignant goes, I didn’t sit down at the keyboard like I’m going to write a Giallo horror movie. It was just like, I’m just going to write a straight horror movie. Which characters can I use for humor? The cops. The cops. They wanted more humor, because I think in my original draft, her sister was a psychologist. Again, serious and straight. Then she became an actress towards production. It’s just for more of that humor that James wanted in that, because he very specifically I think wanted to make a Giallo horror film. I did not know that when I was writing it though.

**Craig:** It worked.

**John:** It worked. Congratulations on these films exist. Let’s segue to talking about how we can make movies and TV in a better and different way. Way back, Craig, in 2013, you and I did what was called A Young Billionaire’s Guide to Hollywood. Craig, you said, “This is not a good way to spend a billion dollars if your goal is to have $10 billion.”

**Craig:** I stand by that statement. That is correct.

**John:** A hundred percent. I would say that neither is building a rocket ship or investing in an F1 racing team. You do it because you want to do it. I think if you are a person with a ton of money who wants to throw a ton of money at something, throwing it at Hollywood is not the worst idea.

**Craig:** You’re right, although it does seem lately that large corporations have been investing in Hollywood to try and make 10 times their return, which has been part of the problem.

**John:** It has been a large part of the problem.

**Craig:** Because you’re absolutely right, it used to be, and this will tie into my One Cool Thing when we get to the end of the show, that very wealthy people would buy sports teams because they were very wealthy and they loved sports. If you could break even or make a little bit of money, fantastic, because the point is, I own a sports team. Mark Cuban’s like, “I’m going to buy Mavericks. I don’t care. I love basketball, and that’s how it’s going to go.” What you wouldn’t get so much is the AT&T buys the Yankees because they believe they can leverage it to synergies and blah blah blah. It does seem like some of the money that’s been moving around in our business hasn’t gotten the message that maybe this isn’t just about pure profit.

**John:** You’re talking about corporations, giant corporations swallowing each other to do a thing. I’m talking about, and this is actually something that really comes out of the genre area, is that once upon a time, we used to have independent studios who were making things. We still have some of those in the film side. We have Legendary, which I guess is now not as independent. We have A24, which has done really well for itself, Annapurna. We have Alcon.

**Craig:** There was Annapurna.

**John:** There was Annapurna. Annapurna was a thing. We have Alcon. We have Bold. We have these companies. A lot of times, those film companies are making their mark by producing less expensive genre pictures that do really, really well. In the case of M3GAN, it was a universal release. It could’ve been at A24. A lot of other places could’ve made that movie. It was not an expensive movie to make.

**Craig:** Blumhouse.

**John:** There’s Blumhouse.

**Akela:** Blumhouse, yeah.

**Craig:** That’s what Blumhouse is.

**John:** I think there’s a model for that. Also, I want to reach back to, once upon a time there used to be TV that was done that same way too. We used to have Carsey-Werner. We used to have Stephen Cannell. They weren’t bankrolled by the studios. They brought in their own money. They were able to make things and sell them off to companies.

**Craig:** Sort of, because those, you could make so much money back then. There are few people still making that kind of money now, like the Shonda type money. She makes her company. The studios that made television, Paramount and so on and so forth, would back your show. It would become this massive hit. Stephen Cannell had so many of those, or Aaron Spelling. Then those people would end up with a billion dollars and be like, “I don’t need Paramount now. I’m just going to do it myself.” They had been funded by the studios paying them a lot.

**John:** Things started in a place. Here’s where I think there may be an opportunity now. Just today, as we’re recording this, news came out that Warner’s is negotiating to sell some of the HBO content to Netflix. It tells you that this model of, we’re only going to make things for ourselves and we’re going to keep them inside our little walled garden, may be changing. People may be starting to make stuff for other people, which is really good news, I think, down the road. Akela?

**Akela:** Or it’s like we’ve come back around to what worked before, because back in that area, Fox eventually had Fox Network, but Fox Studio would still sell shows to CBS or ABC and vice versa. Then the goal was, hey, we’re going to get 100 episodes. Then it became 88. Then we’re going to sell it in a syndication, so that you can watch it when you’re at the gym on a fucking treadmill. Supernatural would run in perpetuity on TBS.

It was a system that worked. People made a living. You had your Stephen Cannells and Dick Wolfs. Also, as a middle-class writer, you could make a living, because guess what? You were getting residuals when they sold it into syndication.

**Craig:** You’re absolutely right. The headline, with the Captain Obvious Statement of the year, said, “According to sources, this,” meaning Warner Bros selling some HBO content to Netflix, “is a financial move.” What? Really?

**Akela:** I’m shocked. I’m shocked.

**Craig:** It’s not friendship is magic? This is fascinating to me. It’s really interesting that it’s happening with HBO, because HBO never was engaged in syndication. HBO was always walled off because it was funded entirely by subscriptions through paid television, and those subscriptions were beefed up through the arrangements with carriers, cable companies and satellite companies.

The ritual suicide that our business has engaged in over the last five years, to eliminate all those structures and make sure that everybody can lose as much money as Netflix does, has created a system where that doesn’t even happen anymore. It does make sense. Look, I don’t know if my shows are going to end up there. It doesn’t matter to me, as long as people watch what I do. I don’t see a problem with this. I guess the first thing they’re going to be throwing out there is Insecure. They’re going to put Insecure on Netflix. So many more people are going to watch Insecure on Netflix than ever watched it on HBO. I have no doubt about this. None.

**John:** It’s not just though that the streamers are saying, the stuff we made for our service will actually license to other places. If you’re Sony, this is really good news, because Sony is one of the few places that’s left that does not have its own streamer. If people are more willing to pick up a show that is owned outside of a service, that’s great news. The opportunities to take things that were made just for one place and actually get them monetized other places, it’s going to help everybody out.

**Craig:** Let’s remember that this was how it was even working five years ago, because Netflix was running Friends. Warner Bros had no problem licensing Friends to Netflix and making a gazillion dollars off of it. Then everybody was like, wait, why are we giving all of this stuff to Netflix and building Netflix up, when we could be doing this ourselves? Missing the fact that Netflix was paying them money for something that no longer cost them money to have. We spent all the money required to make Friends. It’s over. Our Friends costs for this year will be zero, and our income will be all of the money that Netflix sends us for Friends. This does make sense.

We will slowly but surely reinvent the wheel. They will call it something new. Eventually, they’re going to figure out how to take all these channels and conglomerate them into networks. We’ll get back to three networks. Nothing new under the sun.

**John:** Absolutely. There will be true streaming services like Netflix, like we’re used to, where there aren’t commercials. Then there’ll be the commercial version of Netflix. Then there will also be Crackle and Pluto and all the other services that are AVOD and selling ads. It’s okay. It’s okay for people to watch things where they watch them and where they end up. That’s fine.

Here’s my pitch though. I think this is an opportunity for the same people who are now trying to make the next deal with Shonda or Greg Berlanti or Ryan Murphy. If you’re a person with a ton of money, why don’t you go to Shonda and say, “Hey, rather than making that deal at that streamer, why don’t we just make a company? We’ll make all the stuff ourselves and license them out to these places.”

**Craig:** You already lost Ryan, because he went to-

**Akela:** He’s back at Disney.

**John:** He’s back at Disney apparently.

**Akela:** He’s back at Fox by way of Disney.

**Craig:** Disney-Fox.

**John:** Disney-Fox.

**Craig:** Fisney.

**John:** Akela, someone comes up to you with this offer. Do you do it? You have experience in film and TV. Would you?

**Akela:** Yes. If someone is going to be like, “Hey, I’m going to give you x billions of dollars.” Am I making my own network, or am I just making shows?

**John:** You’re Carsey-Werner.

**Craig:** Production company.

**John:** You’re making shows. You’re a production company. You’d do that?

**Akela:** Yes, in a heartbeat. We all have friends who have cool fucking ideas that do not get on air because of the bullshit way this industry works now. It’s so frustrating. It’s so frustrating. I’ve had this happen. I had this happen before the Strike, where it was like, streaming service not to be named was like, “Oh my god, we love your original idea.” I’m like, “Great, I’ve got heat on me. This is going to happen.” Then they took a week, and they came back, and it’s like, “We don’t know if it’s a sure thing, so can you go get a director and an actor attached to this?” It’s like, no.

**Craig:** Do the work of a production company, but you’re not going to be a production company. You’re not going to own anything, but do all the things that owners do. By the way, even if you don’t have any friends at all, which I’m working my way towards that-

**Akela:** Oh my gosh.

**Craig:** Even if you have one show that you make that is a big hit, if you own it, you are going to make vastly more money than if you don’t. The trick of it is, in the old days there was deficit financing of shows. Shows cost more than the license fees that they received from the networks to air them.

Paramount produces a show, and every episode costs, I don’t know, let’s just say a million dollars. It wasn’t that, but let’s just say a million. CBS says, “We’ll give you 500 grand for the rights to air that.” They’re losing a half a million dollars per episode until it hits that magic amount quantity, 100 back then, where you could sell them to syndication, and then boom, all profit all day long, and in perpetuity. If you’re a show like Seinfeld, it never ends. Deficit financing things is tricky for individuals to do, but yeah, in today’s day and age, where a lot of these shows are not producing 22 episodes…

**Akela:** If someone came to me, I would be like, obviously, I’m going to make my show, because now I don’t have to listen to nopes I don’t want to listen to. Again, my friends who have cool ideas that I would love to see as shows, that are different, that bring in different perspectives. It’s like, fuck it, let’s just throw shit at the wall and see what sticks. That’s what everyone else is doing, even though they try to pretend that by going into the past and figuring out what worked before and just repeating that until that horse has been beyond beaten to death, I would be different in that it’s like, I’m going to take a risk, and I know it’s a risk. I’m not going to fire myself if it doesn’t work.

**Craig:** That’s absolutely true.

**John:** Akela, part of what you’re describing might also be, you might want to do a process where rather than shooting an entire season, you might want to actually shoot an episode and see if it works.

**Akela:** What?

**John:** You might actually want to test that. Maybe we could figure out how to do that too.

**Akela:** What would we even call-

**John:** The flyer.

**Akela:** … that thing?

**John:** What would we call the one episode that’s-

**Akela:** If you’re getting in a plane and you’re guiding it, it’s like piloting something?

**John:** Like a pilot? Oh, a pilot?

**Craig:** No, no, no, I hate that. Let’s call it something better. Let’s call it a winger, because you’re winging it. It’s a winger.

**John:** It’s a winger.

**Craig:** The winger wasn’t great, so we’re not picking it up. This is where late-stage capitalism goes. We’ll make everything a pilot. Everything’s now a pilot. The whole season’s a pilot.

Listen. I don’t want to over-romanticize. The old system made an enormous amount of crap. Television was just awful for a long time. It was really a lot of crap. A lot of corny crap. They would make all these pilots. The pilot system, by all accounts, was pretty demeaning. It was this horrible rat race where everyone’s chewing at each other to be the last show that’s picked up from the pilot stuff. The fact that a lot of people were employed doesn’t negate the fact that the people that were in charge of picking pilots and then putting those shows together were kind of crappy shows, were subject to horrible amounts of testing. Networks are still doing people turning dials up and down. “I don’t like her. Her jawbone’s too pointy.” She’s gone. Next. Boom. It wasn’t all sugar and rainbows.

**John:** Craig, there’s a difference between a pilot and pilot season. Pilot season was terrible, because it was [inaudible 00:35:15]. It was artificial scarcity of actors and directors and talent and locations. The idea of being able to see what the thing is before you had to make the full thing is a huge benefit. We had the Game of Thrones guys on to talk about their pilot process and how much they learned shooting a pilot of that show, which was a godsend for them. We could take the best things about the previous system and the best things about the new system and marry them together, I hope, to make something better.

**Craig:** That sounds like a brilliant idea. Let’s do that.

**Akela:** Again, it was also a time where people would just try things. Occasionally, you would get something like The X-Files. That worked. I don’t think at the time that the studio was like, “Oh my god, this is amazing.” It was like, “It works. Slap it on Fridays and see what happens.”

**Craig:** Absolutely. Seinfeld and Cheers come to mind as two shows that were abject failures at the start, just full-on fucking failures, and then they weren’t. Once they caught on, and that’s a lot of television to make, sweating bullets, hoping that people finally catch on. Then they do. There were risks that occurred, and there were rewards that occurred. There was a lot of middle-of-the-roadism also, for sure. There was just some common sense that had been picked up over the years. Pilot season only existed because of cars.

**Akela:** They were sold in the fall.

**Craig:** They were sold in the fall, so that’s when the new show started.

**Akela:** Cars were sold year-round, but the new models would come out.

**Craig:** The new models would come out in September, and the car companies needed new shows to run the ads on. That’s why we ended up with what we ended up with. All that’s gone out the door. It will never go back to what it was, but you can feel…

It was almost like everyone looked around and said, “Nothing about what Netflix is doing makes sense, but obviously, it must make sense, so let’s do what they’re doing, because it couldn’t be that none of that makes sense.” Then they all started doing it. Then they were like, “Oh, no, it doesn’t make sense. It actually doesn’t make sense. We should stop and start going back to stuff that makes sense,” which they are now painfully doing. It seems like there is a painful course correction going on here. The pain is entirely self-inflicted by this industry.

**Akela:** It is. Everyone got enthralled by the idea of subscribers. I am of average intelligence. I will admit that. Sometimes things just do not make sense to me, like NFTs. What the fuck?

**Craig:** NFTs are stupid, and people started to realize that.

**Akela:** Has no one considered that if everyone has a streaming platform, there’s only so many subscribers to go around? What do they think is going to happen? Now we know. It’s imploding.

**Craig:** Now we know. If the only way you can keep your business afloat is by constantly growing your subscriber base, you’re going to run out.

**John:** You’re going to run into a hard cap there.

**Craig:** You’re going to run out. It just doesn’t work. Also, do you remember how expensive cable used to be if you threw HBO and Showtime on there? Oh my god. The bill was 250 bucks a month or something. Now it’s like, if I spend 15 and 15 and 15 and 15 and 15, I can get what I used to get for $300? Yeah, I’ll do that. They devalued their own stuff. They busted all the partnerships they have that created structure.

Again, not sugarcoating the way the past was, but at least from a financial point of view, none of this stuff makes sense to me. I’ve never understood it. I’ve always felt like, I don’t have to. It’s a little bit like I do what I do. Billionaires do what billionaires do. I don’t want a billion dollars. Let them go do that. It does feel like some obvious NFT style what is catching up to us all.

**John:** I see two listener questions here, which I think might be fantastic for our guest here today. Drew, can you help us out?

**Drew Marquardt:** Adam in London writes, “I’m wondering if you have any advice for what I call freeze-frame details in screenplays? These are the kind of details that viewers will only see on a second watch of the film. They might even have to slow down the film or freeze-frame it to see it properly. I’m thinking of the kind of little clues in movies like Hereditary or the subliminal flashes of Tyler Durden in Fight Club. These moments shouldn’t really register for viewers the first time around, so is it odd to signpost them to the reader in the script? Any advice on how you’d word such a moment?”

**Akela:** I usually do signpost them for the reader, just because again, having gone through this process, I’m not going to say executives have gotten lazier, but a lot of people don’t really read scripts, they skim them. Hopefully, your director is going to read it, but you run the risk of things being cut if they’re like, “Oh, we need to get the page count down,” or, “We need to get to this event faster.” I will underline or bold some things in the script, because it forces the reader, the executive, to look at that. This is necessary. If I need to, I can’t remember what script I did this on, but I will be like, hey, this is important.

There was a script recently, pre-Strike, pens down, but yeah, I had a moment where I’m like, “I’m going to highlight this. It will be important later.” Then later on it’s like, “Hey, remember that time I said this was going to be important? Here’s why.” I just want to make sure that the reader, before I’m even given those notes, knows that that moment is important. It’s more of an executive thing than a director thing, because again, I you’ve got a good director, they’re going to read the whole thing. I do highlight those moments however I can in my voice. I think the listener should highlight them in their voice.

**John:** Adam’s also asking about Easter eggs, so things that you might not notice that very first time you’re watching the movie. On a second viewing of Malignant, you might spot some little thing that you didn’t see the first time. That’s maybe not crucial to the initial plot, but it’s rewarding. Akela, can you think of any examples of that where it’s a piece of logic or a piece of something that you’ve put in a script that is maybe not essential for the first viewing of the film, but you need to make sure it’s there for the story to track and make sense?

**Akela:** Again, that would be in the script that I’m currently writing.

**John:** You’re doing it then.

**Akela:** Yes. I don’t say it’s an Easter egg, but in a TV episode, and again, I can’t remember, it was like, on second viewing, the audience should notice this. I have written that in TV scripts, I know.

**John:** I’ve written exactly that, that wording too. Craig, for what you’ve been working on, have there been any examples of things where you’re writing something which you know the viewer’s not going to really catch this the first time through, but will it be meaningful the second time, or that only in a later episode we realize that this line of dialogue is important.

**Craig:** If it’s important, it’s important. That’s how I think about it. If I needed to be in there, either for super fans or people who are obsessive, then it’s going in. Like both of you, I will call it out, so that it’s understood that it’s not just a random detail that should have the same weight as everything else. It is important, even though it seems maybe like it’s not.

Now, there are things that emerge almost always through production, because you capture something, and you’re not quite sure what to do with it, or you get an idea, and you’re like, “Hey, you, go over there, shoot this thing. I don’t know if I’m going to use it or not, but I might.” Then you do, because it’s good. It’s interesting.

One example from Chernobyl, this moment in the episode where it concentrates on the liquidators, the soldiers who went to go clean up Chernobyl, there’s a moment where one of the soldiers sings this traditional Russian song, which lo and behold, is sad. I think it’s called Black Crow. It’s beautiful. It wasn’t anything that we knew about. I didn’t know about it. Johan didn’t know about it. One of the actors was Russian and was just singing it one day, because he said this whole place where we were shooting reminded him of that. I was like, “Here we go.” Sometimes, those things happen.

Because that was a moment where someone was singing something in Russian, we had no expectation that anyone was going to think it was anything other than just some sort of, there’s Russian singing happening now, but not, oh, the lyrics are incredibly poignant and relevant. We just decided screw it, if people are interested, they’ll research it up, and they did. It’s a combination of happy accidents or things that you just, they’re important to you, and that’s enough.

**John:** Yeah. Drew, another question for us?

**Drew:** IMS in Toronto says, “I’m an outlier who doesn’t particularly care about character names. As an audience member, I always seem to forget them or confuse them, and as a writer, I try to avoid them as much as I can. I’m currently writing a story set in the near future, and I refer to all my characters by their profession, you know, reporter, doctor, professor, etc. Since the characters in the story don’t really know each other, there’s no good reason for them to refer to each other by name either. I believe most viewers wouldn’t even realize none of them have proper names. However, a reader told me I should definitely conventionally name the characters for the sake of producers. He says that being an unknown writer, I should avoid straying too much from established standards. He also says that should the script ever get produced, actors might be turned off by the fact that they be playing engineer versus a cool character name. I think that not having a proper character name plays well into a heightened futuristic vibe and vision for the show, but what’s your instinct on this?”

**Akela:** If you believe that in your future world, names are not important, that needs to become a part of the world. That is why they are just called engineer or doctor. Play that up so that the reader understands, oh, this is a world where no one has a proper name. Then you’re not getting notes from executives or actors, because my first thought was like, man, so many actors are going to be like, “What the hell? No,” if only for those IMDb credits, because even now, we’re told, even if it’s just someone who has one line, don’t just put bartender or lady coming out of the bathroom. Give that person a name so that it’s a human being on the IMDb credit.

**John:** I always love that IMDb credit which is like “guy pissing at urinal.”

**Craig:** It’s a great credit.

**John:** The best.

**Craig:** That credit is evocative.

**Akela:** I am someone who’s obsessed with character names. I literally a couple of days ago called my mom, because I’m writing personally, pencils down, something for myself, and it’s set in my hometown. I needed names from the ’90s. I was like, “Hey, can you go get my brother’s yearbook and just start taking photos of his classmates?” I build names off of that.

It is intriguing. That could also be his Wes Anderson thing. We all know a Wes Anderson movie when we fucking see one. If his thing is I don’t want character names, these characters are their professions, that’s a thing. That’s his thing. Again, just make it part of his specific aesthetic in that world, and I think you’ll be fine.

**Craig:** I agree. I actually love this idea. Let me tell you what I don’t love. What I don’t love is anyone who says any version of, “Because you’re an unknown writer, you should not do following.” Fuck that. You’re saying I shouldn’t do a thing that known writers do? If you’re successful and you do this thing, I, being not successful, shouldn’t emulate what successful people do. The thing that successful people do very successfully is not give a fuck about stuff like that. It’s an interesting choice.

It worries me that it’s a show as opposed to a movie, just because 20 episodes in, I do want to get to know people a little bit more intimately, but my guess is you would. At some point, you would. If we’re just talking about a script… Even for the actors, I think when the actor realizes, oh yeah, by the way, Pacino signed on to be Doctor, so it’s okay that we’re coming to you for Lawyer. I think it’s a really interesting thing.

I don’t know who the reader is. I don’t care about crap like that. I’m not interested in readers giving that kind of input. Story input, character input, flow of narrative, all that stuff. It’s when readers put on the “if I ran a studio” hat. You don’t. In fact, your name in my movie would be Reader, so yeah, do that part.

**Akela:** It is interesting. Sorry, I didn’t realize this was a show. I thought it was a movie.

**Craig:** He said show at some point, or she.

**Akela:** They.

**Craig:** They.

**Akela:** It was a show. That would be an interesting thing. Also, what happens when you have two doctors?

**Craig:** You have Tall Doctor and Short Doctor.

**Akela:** Yes, you have to start getting into descriptors. I’m fascinated with the person who asked the question was like, “The characters don’t know each other, so they don’t really address each other by name,” which okay, but if you have Doctor and Engineer talking about Architect, what are they saying?

**Craig:** That’s where I’m not quite sure, since it’s set in the future, even though near future, if this is just a convention that’s occurred societally or if it’s something that’s specific about this other planet or if it’s just that thing where this person says the characters in the story don’t really know each other. There’s no good reason for them to refer to each other by name either. I should say as an aside, one of my pet peeves is when people are constantly using each other’s names with them.

**John:** Their names when they wouldn’t be, yeah.

**Craig:** We just don’t do that. Sometimes I realize, oh my god, I’ve made it to the end of the script, and no one ever said this person’s name out loud, because they didn’t have to. At some point, we do need to know what it is. It would be one thing if IMS said, “They’re going to be called Reporter, Doctor, Professor, and they will never have a name beyond that.” That’s a super hard choice to make.

**John:** It’s a choice.

**Craig:** It’s a choice. If the theory is at some point we’ll learn their names, and actually that’s kind of a big deal, that’s fascinating. Then learning their name becomes really interesting, because when we find out someone’s name that we’ve been talking to or having a connection with, it’s a moment. It’s an interesting moment.

**John:** Absolutely. I agree with everything that’s been said. I think what we need to remember about a name though is it’s not just a thing, handy little handle for our reader, it’s also how people in the world can refer to each other. I think IMS is going to run into problems where they need to talk about that person to a third party, and you just have no way to do that.

Watching a Game of Thrones, most of the time I could not remember any of those characters’ names. We have shorthand in the house, but the tall guy, or the guy who’s traveling with her. You figure out that kind of stuff. You have ways to talk about people. You end up inventing names for people, even if the show itself does not give the person a name. They’re going to be finding ways to identify those people. Let’s do our One Cool Things. Craig, I see you’ve added a One Cool Thing, so I don’t want to take it away from you here.

**Craig:** You wouldn’t, but I don’t always have a One Cool Thing. I like that now it’s special. It takes me forever to watch things. I have been just getting the quiet, passive-aggressive stink eye from Rob McElhenney for months now, because I hadn’t watched his documentary show on Hulu called Welcome to Wrexham.

Welcome to Wrexham is the documentary story of the English football team, the footy club, that he and Ryan Reynolds purchased in Wrexham, Wales, and the story of this team that’s buried in a fairly low-level tier of English football, struggling to make it to get promoted to the next level up.

Finally, I couldn’t handle it anymore, and so I did it. I was going to do it anyway. You watch something for a friend. When you start, it’s a little bit homeworky. I was so in on this thing, within, I don’t know, seven minutes. I was so in on it. It is so well done. It is so charming. It is so sweet. It is not at all what you think it’s going to be. Yes, there is some fun bits of football, but I don’t care about soccer. I’ve never cared about soccer, and furthermore, I never will. What I am obsessed with, stories of economically depressed towns in the United Kingdom. Boy, do I-

**John:** Billy Elliot, yeah, right there.

**Craig:** Oh, Billy Elliot, how you claim my heart, or In the Name of the Father, or any movie that deals with the economically… The Full Monty. There’s so many. What a genre. I love that genre. This is true. This is real people. It focuses on a certain kind of segment of English society that we just generally don’t see. We see lords and ladies, and we see the royalty, and this is something else.

First of all, Rob and Ryan are both, not only on television, but in person, just lovely human beings. They’re just quality humans. What you see is what you get. They’re authentic, and you can tell. What they’ve done for this town and what has happened to this town is pretty remarkable. It is a delight. It is funny at times. It is exhilarating at times and very, very sweet always.

As a kicker for those of you who are Scriptnotes fans, they sent over a gentleman named Humphrey Ker to be their emissary. Humphrey is an Englishman. For those of you who are Scriptnotes fans, he is Megan Ganz’s husband, so Megan Ganz, who’s been on our show and who’s a wonderful person. I met Humphrey when we were all in those early, heady days of Mythic Quest, figuring out what that show was. Humphrey was on staff there as well and also played a part on the show. Big recommendation for Welcome to Wrexham. It is on Hulu. There are a lot of episodes.

**John:** There are a lot of episodes. There are a lot of episodes.

**Craig:** There are a lot of episodes, but they’re 25, 30 minutes long. They go down easy, quick, and you do not need to like either soccer or Britain.

**John:** Or human beings.

**Craig:** Really, or humans. If you like Rob and Ryan, I think you’ll be okay. In fact, if you like Rob or Ryan, you’ll be fine.

**John:** One of the two. A difference between you and me, Craig, so Rob is your friend, Ryan is my friend. I watched it the day it came out and then texted him.

**Craig:** Yeah, because you’re literally a fucking Eagle Scout. You are literally an Eagle Scout. Do you know how many badges I earned as a Boy Scout? Guess.

**John:** Two?

**Craig:** Zero, because I was never a Boy Scout, nor would I ever be. How dare you.

**John:** You should’ve been. My One Cool Thing is shorter and simpler. An article by Clare Watson in Nature called Evolution Keeps Making Crabs, And Nobody Knows Why.

**Craig:** What kind of crabs are we talking about here?

**John:** You know evolution. Evolution, things adapted to their environment. They change. You have trees of things that grow out. You see, oh, these would be all the crabs. For some reason, crabs have independently developed many, many times. They are not related in ways that they should be related. They will develop claws and pincers in ways that they work. There’s true crabs and not true crabs. There’s something about the biomechanical form of crabs that is-

**Craig:** I’m literally laughing every single sentence that you say the word crabs.

**John:** I say crabs. It’s great.

**Craig:** Every single one is funny. Keep going.

**John:** There’s something about crabs, Craig.

**Craig:** Yes, there is.

**John:** They just get under your skin. They’re an irritant.

**Craig:** You keep scratching at this, you’re going to get to something important.

**John:** You keep scratching, I’m going to get to something good here. How they work in multiple environments has given them some sort of evolutionary advantage. We keep coming back to crabs for some reason. I think at some point, we’ll be visited by an alien species, and they will probably be crab-like, because it just seems to be a very effective form.

**Craig:** Have you seen the South Park episode where they go underground and meet the crab people?

**John:** I do not remember a crab people episode of that.

**Craig:** Spectacular.

**John:** I’m sure. I’m sure it’s spectacular.

**Craig:** Crab people. Crab people. The headline here, we’ve discussed many times that people who write articles do not write the headlines that go on the articles. I can’t give Clare Watson credit for this. Clare Watson wrote the article that you’re referring to here. Somebody at sciencealert.com wrote this headline, Evolution Keeps Making Crabs, And Nobody Knows Why. That’s awesome. Nobody?

**John:** Nobody.

**Craig:** What? Where are all these crabs coming from, evolution? This is also delightful.

**John:** It is delightful. You look through the tree here, and you see, oh, why did it happen this way? We don’t know.

**Craig:** Nobody knows.

**John:** Crabs.

**Craig:** Crabs. People.

**John:** Akela, what do you have for us?

**Akela:** I guess overall it’s Arnold Schwarzenegger.

**Craig:** That works.

**Akela:** I’m a fan of documentaries, and I recently watched the Arnold doc on Netflix. Also just being an ’80s baby, Arnold Schwarzenegger was huge in my household. My dad is a huge Conan the Barbarian fan, so he watched it all the time. I love Terminator, Commando, Predator. We’ve talked about Predator.

**Craig:** Commando.

**Akela:** I’m just fascinated by that era. I’m also in the process of reading this book called The Last Action Heroes: The Triumphs, Flops, and Feuds of Hollywood’s Kings of Carnage, which is basically about that period in the ’80s between Schwarzenegger, Stallone-

**Craig:** Stallone.

**Akela:** … Van Dam, Chuck Norris, Jackie Chan. It is fascinating to just see behind the curtain of that and how much Stallone and Schwarzenegger actually hated each other. It was basically like evolutionary warfare. They were each other’s inspiration. I think after Stallone did Rambo, Schwarzenegger was like, “I need a movie like that.” Commando came out.

**Craig:** Commando happened. Did they talk about how Stallone ended up in, I think it was Stop or My Mom Will Shoot?

**Akela:** No, I haven’t gotten to that part yet. I am on-

**Craig:** It’s incredible.

**Akela:** He has just directed Staying Alive.

**Craig:** All I’ll say is, Schwarzenegger is an evil genius. That’s all I’m going to say. Let’s see if they get to it. It’s spectacular.

**Akela:** Oh my god, you watch the documentaries. I am on TikTok, and so sometimes there will be clips from old movies. There’s this interview with Schwarzenegger and Jesse Ventura, which I think is part of the behind the scenes on Predator. Jesse Ventura was like, “I went into wardrobe and I found out that my bicep was one inch bigger than Schwarzenegger’s. I was bragging about it.” Then Schwarzenegger was like, “Good, because I went in before him and I told the wardrobe lady to measure him and lie and say his bicep was bigger than mine, so that then I could go and bet him a bottle of champagne that it wasn’t true.” He is a mastermind. It’s so weird how cunning and charming Arnold Schwarzenegger is. He has done awful things. In the documentary, he actually owns up to all of that. That man’s mind is like a steep trap. It’s since he was a child too.

**Craig:** I will say that the bicep trick, it’s almost exactly what he does to Stallone, except on a scale that is so terrifying, and that led to an entire movie being made that should’ve never been made. It’s astonishing.

**John:** I love it.

**Akela:** I look forward to that. That’s what my Cool Thing right now is. Again, I just love ’80s action movies, ’80s horror movies.

**Craig:** Have you ever seen the little best of moments from Arnold Schwarzenegger’s DVD commentary on Conan the Barbarian?

**Akela:** A long time ago.

**Craig:** John, have you ever seen it?

**John:** You’ve talked me through them. It sounds amazing. I think over D and D we’ve talked about it. It’s great.

**Craig:** It’s so special. “Look at [indiscernible 01:00:27]. Look at him. Now he’s turning into a snake.” He’s just saying what you’re looking at. “Now he’s drinking the liquid.”

**John:** It’s descriptions for the visually impaired and blind. I love it.

**Craig:** It’s incredible. He’s so drunk when he’s doing it. He’s so clearly shit-faced.

**Akela:** One of the great things years ago was the musicals on YouTube of his movies, like Commando the musical. Oh my god.

**Craig:** I gotta check that out.

**Akela:** You have to watch this. It’s hilarious.

**Craig:** Love Commando.

**John:** We’ll add it to the list.

**Craig:** “Hey Bennett, why don’t you let off a little steam?”

**Akela:** It really is them singing. It’s like, “Bennett, John, I’m here again.”

**Craig:** What is his name? It’s John. What is it again? It’s a name that a man with a strong Austrian accent would not have.

**John:** Perfect.

**Craig:** He plays John Matrix. That’s his name, John Matrix, you know, a very popular name in [crosstalk 01:01:25], John Matrix.

**John:** Matrix.

**Craig:** “I’m John Matrix.”

**Akela:** It’s just at some point, he was so successful. People were just like, “We don’t care how he got the accent.”

**Craig:** It doesn’t matter.

**Akela:** It makes no sense how he has any of the jobs he does.

**John:** Love it.

**Craig:** Just the armory bunker that he has in Commando alone, which I loved. I loved that. I was like, “He’s got a special secret room full of all the weapons in the world.” Anyway, that’s our show.

**John:** That’s our show. Scriptnotes is produced by Drew Marquardt.

**Craig:** Wahoo!

**John:** It’s edited by Matthew Chilelli.

**Craig:** Woo-woo!

**John:** Our outro is by Nora Beyer. If you have an outro, you can send us a link to ask@johnaugust.com. That’s also the place where you can send questions. You’ll find the show notes for this episode and all episodes at johnaugust.com. That’s also where you can find the transcripts and sign up for our weekly newsletter called Inneresting, which has lots of links to things about writing.

We have T-shirts and they’re great. You can find them at Cotton Bureau. Craig, I forgot to send you, I think I did text you the new Scriptnotes T-shirt. Did I send it to you?

**Craig:** I don’t think you did.

**John:** You can picture the CBS Special Presentation, right?

**Craig:** (sings)

**John:** Imagine that with the word Scriptnotes coming in and that color pattern.

**Craig:** All I want to wear. Just get me an entire wardrobe of that.

**John:** They’re absolutely gorgeous. You will love them.

**Craig:** That was before your time, Akela, I’m guessing, the CBS Special Presentation intro music? (sings)

**Akela:** I think so, yeah.

**Craig:** That was such dopamine for ’70s kids.

**John:** Oh my god.

**Craig:** That meant something fucking incredible was about to go down.

**John:** Was about to happen.

**Craig:** Whether it was like, it’s Rikki-Tikki-Tavi or it’s whatever, it’s some animated awesomeness or some just incredible thing.

**John:** Not a Bond movie, because CBS didn’t have the Bond movies, but something great like that was going to be on. So good.

**Craig:** Something awesome. It would spin. Crack. Crack for ‘70s kids.

**John:** So good. So good. You can sign up to become a Premium member at scriptnotes.net, where you get all the back-episodes and bonus segments, like the one we should record, although we’re running out of time. Akela, are we willing to talk about the writers’ programs you went through before you started your staff writing career? Because I’m really curious how those went for you and what you think about the changes there.

**Akela:** Yes.

**John:** Akela Cooper, thank you so much for coming on Scriptnotes. It was an absolute delight to get to talk to you about Schwarzenegger and genre and how to change the film and television industry.

**Craig:** Thank you.

**John:** You’re an absolute hero [indiscernible 01:03:52].

**Akela:** Thank you. This was fun.

[Bonus Segment]

**John:** Akela, so you, before you started as a staff writer on V, you had gone through film school. You’d also done two different writing programs. Can you tell us about what you learned in those different programs and how they helped or did not help you get started as a television writer?

**Akela:** They both helped tremendously. As somebody who’s a little bit socially awkward, I did the CBS writers’ program first, and it was really helpful in helping to set expectations for staff writers when we are on the show. For lack of a better phrase, a lot of times, staff writers don’t know how to act in the writers’ room. That can often be to their detriment, which will lead to them not being asked back. We had people who would come in. Showrunners would come in and talk to us about expectations and answer our questions, like, is this okay, is that not okay.

It was just a great experience in how to navigate potential scenarios and also just building a network of people that we could reach out to, whether it was like… I’m actually still friends with Carole Kirschner, who runs the CBS writers’ program. I had a great mentor in Leigh Redman, who was at CBS at the time. If ever I felt lost, I would be like, “Hey, can you guys help me out here? I don’t know what I’m doing wrong,” or on that level.

We also did mock writers’ rooms. It was like, hey, we’re going to break an episode of Grey’s Anatomy. John Worth came in to talk us through that, show us the ropes of what a writers’ room does and how it operates before we actually got into one. It set us up for success.

Warner Bros operates in pretty much the same way. It was just another bite at the apple. It’s like, okay, this is what you do for this situation, and this is what you do for this situation. Warner Bros was also very helpful in getting most of us representation. I got my manager through the Warner Bros Writers’ Workshop, which I still have today. I think he and I are going on 14 years together.

**John:** A question for you, Akela. You are a huge success. You came out of these programs and are a huge success. Of your cohorts who are in those programs, how many of them are workings as writers today, top of your head? A bunch?

**Akela:** A bunch. In CBS, I can say Aaron Rahsaan Thomas was a showrunner for SWAT on CBS. From CBS, he ended up getting on Friday Night Lights. Janet Lynn did a bunch. She did Bones, I think after CBS, meaning that’s the job that she got coming out of the program. She’s been working her way up. Those are the two off the top of my head. I think there’s another one who ended up in animation, who was with us in our program. He was doing well in animation. Warner Bros, Lilla and Nora Zuckerman, who were the showrunners recently on Poker Face. Now I need to look up all of our class. Most of us are working.

**John:** That’s a pretty good hit rate. It feels like it was a good investment for these programs to have spent the time and money on you guys to make sure that you had this training, because now you’re able to make shows for these networks, which is amazing. Now, talk to us about what you learned in those programs versus learned at USC and film school? You went through a graduate screenwriting program?

**Akela:** Yes. Love USC, as someone who had no connections to the industry here. It was helpful for me. I know a lot of people don’t need grad school. You don’t have to spend that money. Again, I went to USC for feature writing, not knowing there was… At the time, there was a nascent TV program. I got into that, because we would have to take one class. I ended up discovering this whole new world that I did not know existed beforehand.

USC is what got me into television. It opened my eyes in that way. I had a lot of good professors who were very supportive, because a lot of people think that USC, especially at the time, was like, “This is where you go to make several blockbusters. They don’t care about art or anything like that. That’s what you go to NYU for.” Our professors were like, “No, write what you want to write. Write what you are passionate about.” They were very nurturing and encouraging in that aspect and just teaching us.

As far as features goes, I did need to learn structure, because I had written scripts in high school and college. They’re trash. It was very helpful. There’s a structure, first act, second act, third act. You can break it up into five acts if you fucking feel like it. There’s a structure to movies.

Also, even with USC, it’s like, nothing else matters if no one cares about the characters. That was the big thing at USC. It’s like, you gotta get your audience invested in your characters no matter what you are writing. It was a really good experience in setting me up to learn the basics before you start going off and breaking the rules.

**John:** Akela, can I guess that USC was really good in theory and how to get words on the page, but these programs were how to actually be a working writer in the business? Is that a fair difference?

**Akela:** USC was like, you had deadlines and you had to turn in pages, but CBS and Warner Bros is like, you got two weeks usually. It doesn’t matter, when you’re on a show, what you are going through. You gotta turn in your scripts. It’s a machine. Of course, this was network television that they were focusing on at the time. It’s like, once that production train is moving, they’re not going to stop for you as a staff writer, so you have to learn how to hit your deadlines and make your showrunner’s life easier.

**John:** Craig, you have never been a big fan of organized education over screenwriting or television writing. Hearing this description of the writers’ programs at these studios, what’s your instinct? What do you feel?

**Craig:** They’re proper vocational programs. It makes absolute sense. In most, we’ll call them crafts, trades, there is a job training that is run either by an employer, which in this case is what this is, or they’re also apprenticeship programs that are run through unions. What you don’t do is spend $80,000 a year to have somebody lecture to you about arc welding. You instead are employed and trained as an arc welder. You learn how to arc weld from folks in the arc welders local whatever. Then you start arc welding.

I am fully in favor of all vocational programs like this, but particularly these programs that are run by the companies, because they’re certainly not going to be leading you down a primrose path. They’re going to be teaching you how to work for them. That’s what they’re there for. Big thumb’s up to any vocational program. Not so much of a thumb’s up to expensive graduate programs.

**John:** Akela, what is the status of these programs right now? Some were canceled. Some were reinstated. Do we know where these programs are at right now?

**Akela:** I believe CBS is still going, but Warner Bros has been dismantled due to-

**Craig:** I thought they brought it back. I thought there was an outcry.

**Akela:** There was. From what I understand, I don’t think it’s going to be the same thing. I could be wrong. The program, as far as I knew it, is no longer there.

**John:** Of course, one of the issues also is how our industry works, is that these programs can train a bunch of writers inside their programs, but those people are going to be working for all the other networks. I can see someone looking at this as a cost on a balance sheet and saying, oh, why should we be paying to train writers for Netflix or for other people. It’s short-term thinking, but also that’s the frustration.

**Akela:** I think CBS joined, because when I did CBS, they didn’t pay for you as a staff writer, which is a point of contention, but Warner Bros. The idea was that Warner Bros didn’t want their own farm system. We were like Triple-A baseball. They were going to invest money in us.

On V, because I got V through Warner Bros, they paid for me. My salary did not come out of the show’s budget. That’s what that means. I think they would do that for two years, because they do want to start you off as a staff writer, and hopefully you get on a hit show and you work your way up and then they’ve got a showrunner down the line. The original idea of the Warner Bros Writers’ Workshop was that, yes, they’re going to do what you say, John, they’re going to invest money in us, and then years later they’re going to have a trained showrunner within their camp.

**Craig:** I think Universal’s feature development program works similarly, where they’re like, look, we’re going to put you through this program. You’re going to learn these things. We’re basically giving you a blind script deal for something. We can also put something on you. We can assign you something. The point is, you’re going to write something here. You’re going to write it for… There are definitely ways to make it function.

The expense of these programs is couch change. It’s not an actual number that is relevant to the operation of these companies. No offense to Mr. Zaslav, but every time he sneezes more money comes out than the amount that any of those programs cost. If they want to say that, they can say it, but that ain’t why. It’s usually because it’s a hassle to make a program, find people to run the program, deal with people having issues with the program, and then figuring out who should be in the program. It’s annoying. Doing things is hard. It’s so much easier to not do things than to do things, so they don’t want to do things. This is worth doing. It would be hard for anybody to defend not doing it with any excuse other than, “I don’t want to.” That’s the only actual legitimate excuse I can imagine.

**John:** Akela Cooper, thank you so much.

**Akela:** Thank you.

**Craig:** Thank you, Akela.

**John:** Bye.

**Craig:** Bye.

Links:

* Akela Cooper on [IMDb](https://www.imdb.com/name/nm4868455/) and [Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/akelacooper/)
* [Paramount Writers Mentoring Program](https://www.paramount.com/writers-mentoring-program)(formerly CBS Writers Mentoring Program)
* [Warner Bros. Television Workshop](https://televisionworkshop.warnerbros.com/)
* [M3GAN Dance Scene](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1c7XccFwJrQ)
* [Episode 122: “Young Billionaires Guide to Hollywood”](https://johnaugust.com/2013/young-billionaires-guide-to-hollywood)
* [Ben Affleck And Matt Damon Launch Production Company With RedBird Capital’s Gerry Cardinale](https://deadline.com/2022/11/ben-affleck-matt-damon-launch-production-company-with-redbird-capital-1235178013/) by Bruce Haring for Variety
* [Warner Bros. Discovery In Talks To License HBO Original Series To Netflix](https://deadline.com/2023/06/warner-bros-discovery-in-talks-to-license-hbo-original-series-to-netflix-1235421444/) by Peter White for Deadline
* [The Carsey-Werner Company](https://www.carseywerner.com/) on [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Carsey-Werner_Company)
* [Чёрный Ворон (Black Raven) – Chernobyl OST](https://youtu.be/-q23tuds2ZU)
* [Evolution Keeps Making Crabs, And Nobody Knows Why](https://www.sciencealert.com/evolution-keeps-making-crabs-and-nobody-knows-why) by Clare Watson for Science Alert
* [Welcome to Wrexham](https://www.fxnetworks.com/shows/welcome-to-wrexham) on FX and Hulu
* [Arnold](https://www.netflix.com/title/81317673) on Netflix
* [The Last Action Heroes](https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/668268/the-last-action-heroes-by-nick-de-semlyen/) by Nick de Semlyen
* [Commando: The Musical](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8FFQ_g8OoQM)
* [Get a Scriptnotes T-shirt!](https://cottonbureau.com/people/scriptnotes-podcast)
* [Check out the Inneresting Newsletter](https://inneresting.substack.com/)
* [Gift a Scriptnotes Subscription](https://scriptnotes.supportingcast.fm/gifts) or [treat yourself to a premium subscription!](https://scriptnotes.supportingcast.fm/)
* [Craig Mazin](https://www.instagram.com/clmazin/) on Instagram
* [John August](https://twitter.com/johnaugust) on Twitter
* [John on Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/johnaugust/?hl=en)
* [John on Mastodon](https://mastodon.art/@johnaugust)
* [Outro](http://johnaugust.com/2013/scriptnotes-the-outros) by Nora Beyer ([send us yours!](http://johnaugust.com/2014/outros-needed))
* Scriptnotes is produced by Drew Marquardt and edited by [Matthew Chilelli](https://twitter.com/machelli). Our intern is Halley Lamberson.

Email us at ask@johnaugust.com

You can download the episode [here](http://traffic.libsyn.com/scriptnotes/603standard.mp3).

Scriptnotes, Episode 595: Correctable Crises, Transcript

May 30, 2023 Scriptnotes Transcript

The original post for this episode can be found [here](https://johnaugust.com/2023/correctable-crises).

**John August:** Hey, this is John. I have a pre-correction to this episode you’re about to listen to. Later on, I refer to Jesse Alexander of Succession. The quote is actually by Lucy Prebble, another executive producer of Succession. That’s it. That’s my mistake. Enjoy the episode.

Hello and welcome. My name is John August, and you’re listening to Scriptnotes, a podcast about screenwriting and things that are interesting to screenwriters. Today on the show, we answer listener questions on the craft and the business of writing from our overflowing mailbag. In our bonus segment for premium members, what do you do when a coworker is nice but incompetent? We’ll discuss one of the trickiest workplace situations.

Craig is traveling this week, but luckily, we have someone extraordinarily qualified to take his place. Danielle Sanchez-Witzel is a writer-producer whose many credits include My Name is Earl, The Carmichael Show. Her latest show is Up Here, streaming now on Hulu. Welcome, Danielle.

**Danielle Sanchez-Witzel:** Hi. Thanks for having me, John. I’m happy to be here.

**John:** Danielle, you and I only know each other because we’re both on the negotiating committee. We’ve been sitting in these giant rooms across tables from each other. It’s so great to talk to you about what you do.

**Danielle:** I am so happy we met that way. I knew of you, just to be clear. I just didn’t know you until I got into that room. Happy to be doing something that’s not negotiating, to be perfectly honest with you, John.

**John:** Absolutely. We had a question last night at the member meeting about what does the negotiating committee actually do, what do you do in the room. I tried to answer that, and I feel like I kind of flubbed it, honestly, because I was trying to segue to talk about something else, but I was trying to quickly get through the negotiating part. Because I have a podcast, I’m going to take a second crack at it here. I’m going to try to explain what happens in the negotiating room.

I think I have this fantasy that it’s going to be like an Aaron Sorkin movie, like The Social Network, where people get these devastating lines and there’s rhetorical traps that are laid, that spring and change everything. It’s not like that.

**Danielle:** It’s not. It’s not like that at all, no.

**John:** No. It’s more like those foreign streaming shows that people tell you to watch, and they’ll say, “It’s really, really slow, but you’ve gotta stick with it, because you’ll think that nothing’s happening, but eventually it all happens.” You’re like, “Oh wow, that was actually really impressive, but it was subtle.” It’s one of those maddening but subtle kind of processes for me. Has that been your experience?

**Danielle:** Absolutely. I was really glad that question was asked at the meeting last night, because I think it’s such a fair question. I don’t know if our members wonder about it, but clearly that member did, so I imagine more perhaps do.

This is going to sound crazy, but something that really surprised me when we first walked into the room is that we’re literally sitting across a table from each other, just the visual. The table is pretty narrow, and we’re just sitting across from it.

This is my first negotiating committee I’ve ever been on. I know that’s not true for you. I’m really giving first impression kind of a take. I don’t know why I was surprised by being so close to the AMPTP members. I think what you’re describing in terms of vibe and pace is pretty accurate.

**John:** We have incredibly smart people on our side. Staff does almost all of the talking in the room when we’re actually in the room with the other people. Then we get back to our caucus room, and that’s the chance where we get to actually say clever things as writers and tell jokes and make important points.

One of the important points I really loved hearing you talk about was your experience making these last two shows. In addition to Up Here, you also have Survival of the Thickest, this Netflix show. You were talking about how challenging it’s been to make shows as a writer-producer these days because of structural changes of the industry, that the experience of doing My Name is Earl is just so vastly different from what’s happening now with these new shows. Could you give us a sense of that, what it’s like to be making a show in 2023 and how challenging it is for you as a showrunner?

**Danielle:** Absolutely. I have spent a majority of my career making broadcast network shows. I have to say I’m really grateful for that experience. I know young writers will understand what I’m saying, because what I had access to… Somehow we separated writing from production, and so this next generation of writers isn’t getting access to what I had access to on every show I worked on, on My Name is Earl, on New Girl, a brilliant staff of writers who were there for the entire time of making the show.

Pre-production, when there’s no production going on, when you’re just in a writers’ room coming up with ideas and stories and writing scripts and rewriting scripts, tabling scripts. I work in comedy, so the table is really important.

Then during production, which overlaps in broadcast network, so now you’re actually shooting the show and you’re making the show and the writers are still there. A writer or two is on set, covering the production, while a writers’ room is continuing to do work, continuing to rewrite, continuing to write stories.

Then in post-production, which I think is the thing that writers are really not getting access to anymore, maybe even in broadcast network, and that’s obviously watching cuts and giving notes. There’s a ton of rewriting that happens in pre-production, especially in comedy, but I think drama too. We’re rewriting jokes. We’re rewriting ADR. There’s so much you can do if you’re on an actor’s back. I’m sure savvy television watchers know, like, “That line was ADR. There’s no way that’s what they said here.” It’s the final phase of storytelling.

I came up in my career being a part of that, all of that, that whole process, and having a whole staff to be able to be there, to work on all phases of the show, including when I ran The Carmichael Show, which was a multi-cam broadcast network. I am so grateful that I had this amazing staff of writers who was there to help me. It’s very hard to run a show. It’s so much work. Writers are a vital part of the entire process. Now I am exclusively making stream. Up Here was, as you said, a show for Hulu that I did with a very talented group of Broadway superstars, Tony winners. They needed one person who had never won a Tony, so somehow I got added to that group. We’ve separated for streaming.

Even though that was a 20th studio show for Hulu, meaning 20th makes shows for broadcast network, so as a studio they understand what this model was, for some reason streaming, because it’s less episodes, somehow the industry companies thought, “You don’t need writers for as long of a time, because it’s less episodes.” Both of the shows I just made were eight-episode orders.

There’s this new model now. Any young writers who have experienced this, who might be listening, you know what it is. You can have writers for somewhere around 12 to 20 weeks, 20 if you’re lucky. That’s it. Then they all go away. Again, if you’re lucky, maybe you get to keep one writer who comes to set with you or continues the process with you, but that’s it.

This machine that has worked so well for so many generations and produced the best shows in the history of TV stopped working that way. All of a sudden, it just got cut off for a reason I can’t tell you. I can’t tell you why, because we’re the ones who make it. We know how to make the product. I don’t know how exactly over the last five, six years this industry practice started.

It became this thing where you’re supposed to try and write all the scripts and get it all right before you hit production. It’s impossible. It’s not how the sausage is made. That’s not how we do it. That’s not how we’ve ever done it. It’s left showrunners to have to do everything, again maybe with one pal, with one super talented pal, do all the rewriting, get all the scripts ready, now handle all the production, and then overlap with post and do all of that while you’re just a crew of one or two people.

On Survival of the Thickest, which is the Netflix show, the last show I made, I was very lucky that my star is also a writer, co-creator of the show. Guess what? She’s acting now. I had one other writer, a really talented woman named Grace Edwards, who thank god was there with me.

The process is the process for a reason. I really got worn down. I know there are a lot of showrunners who are having to do this who are really worn down. Plus a lot of writers who aren’t getting access to what they need know they could be valuable to the process and are being told, “We don’t need you anymore.” I assure you I’m not the one saying we don’t need you anymore. I’ve been screaming, “I need them. I need them,” and I was told no. I was told I couldn’t have them. That’s the state of the industry through my eyes, at least.

**John:** I’ve avoided TV for most of my career, mostly because I was afraid of the doing 19 jobs at once problem. I was hired on to do a show called DC very early on in my career. I had no business being a showrunner on it. I was trying to prep an episode, shoot an episode, write an episode, post an episode, and do all these things at once. I couldn’t do it. I said, “Oh, TV’s not for me, at least not for me at this point in my life.”

I thought, oh, this change to shorter orders, the ability to write all the scripts at once and then just do one thing at a time seems really good, until you surface all these problems you’re describing, which is that by separating these things so completely, you don’t have any support to actually make the show.

Those writers who should be learning about all the other parts of the process, they’re gone. They’re hopefully on other shows. They are just not part of the process anymore. It’s not only hurting the show that you’re making right now. It’s hurting all the future shows that these other writers are going to be making, because they will not have the experience. They’ll be just as clueless as I was when I was trying to make my first show, because they will not have had production experience. We have people who come to these member meetings who say, “I have written on three shows, a full season on three shows. I have never been to set.” That is a crisis in the making.

**Danielle:** Absolutely. I have told the companies I work for that this is going to hurt them. I don’t know that anyone’s believed me. Maybe I’m not talking to the people who really have the power to change it.

The truth is that the business model has worked for a reason. I think there was this misunderstanding of shorter order creating a new world that isn’t truly how to make a thing. I think it would be interesting to see what people think about the quality of TV. I know that’s something we think about creators so much and as writers and the people making these worlds is that we want it to be the best it can be. I know I don’t have the resources to do what I used to have the resources to do. I know that that is going to affect all kinds of things. At the end of the day, we’re making a product to entertain people. You want that to be the best product it can possibly be.

It’s frustrating at every level. I don’t think there’s a writer who isn’t frustrated in episodic television right now, because it is a collaborative process. That’s what it is. We’re taking collaboration away quickly. It’s like you can collaborate for a little bit, but then you’re done collaborating. It’s just not how to do 8 episodes or 10 episodes or 22 episodes.

It’s a big issue in our industry that we’re looking to fix for everybody. I do think it’s a win-win. I think the companies will win if we fix this and we will win if we fix this at the end of the day in terms of how to get it done.

**John:** It’s almost important to point out that what we’re describing is not impossible. I was looking at an interview with Jesse Alexander, who runs Succession. They were asking him, “How do you have so many great lines in every episode?” He said, “We have two to three writers on set at all times.” That’s the great answer.

**Danielle:** That’s the great answer. Jesse’s great answer.

**John:** It is a short season, and so theoretically, you could’ve written all of those ahead of time, sent everybody home, and had Jesse Alexander run the whole thing by himself. This is a person who recognizes, no, we actually need the writers here to do the work of writing in production. I’m sure those writers were involved in every step of post-production too. I know they overshoot stuff. You’re always making decisions about how to shape the episode in post.

This is a very, very successful show that has a sizable writing staff that is involved throughout production in a short-order season scenario. It’s very definitely doable. This is the right solution for Succession. I think it’s the right solution for so many shows. If we can make some changes in our contract that makes it more clear this is how we really need to structure these things, it’s going to be better for television but also for everyone who needs to make shows.

**Danielle:** Absolutely. Absolutely. It’s good to hear that. In success, maybe you’ll get more of what you’re asking for. It’s like, how do I succeed if you’re not giving me the tools I need in the first place? I’m supposed to succeed by the skin of my teeth, and then if there’s any sort of succeeding, then you can have what you need. I’m really happy to hear that. That’s the truth. I think Succession is one of the funniest shows on television-

**John:** Agreed.

**Danielle:** … although it’s not billed that way.

**John:** Technically a drama, but yes, it has comedy bones to it. Let’s tackle some listener questions. I’m sure we’ll be threading in some more of our thoughts about television throughout this. Drew, do you want to start us off with a craft question?

**Drew Marquardt:** Yeah, let’s start with Patrick. Patrick asks, “How much pressure should we be putting on ourselves as writers to make sure something is purely original? I recently saw an obscure international film from the ‘50s, and it sparked an idea that would involve borrowing the initial premise and taking the story in a different direction, one that they wouldn’t have been able to explore in that period of time.

“The idea didn’t leave me, and now I have an outline for what I think could be a great drama. It’s my own story, but it would have a ringing similarity for anyone who has also seen the film that inspired it. I’m torn between whether this is a reason to not move forward with the idea and wondered where you consider the line between taking inspiration and ripping off someone else’s work.

“Part of me wants to justify it by saying writers do this all the time with genre pieces, Die Hard onto something or something in space, so why can’t I with a character drama? Part of me feels icky.”

**John:** Patrick, yeah, I get the sense of feeling icky about these things, but you’re also right to be pointing out that all art is iterative. Everything is inspired by things that happened before. I think you’re worried about like, am I borrowing too directly from this obscure movie that most people haven’t seen? Danielle, what’s your first instinct here for Patrick’s quandary?

**Danielle:** I wish I knew whatever inciting incident it was that he wanted to, because it might matter. I do think a gut feeling of ickiness is trying to tell you something. I think writers are paid for their gut. I say this a lot. I like using your gut as a bar for, “I think the story should go this way, this way.”

I think if there’s something you’re feeling icky about, then maybe there is one piece of this, and again not knowing the specifics, that might need to change a little bit more than what the plan is.

We’re never reinventing a wheel. It’s just through different eyes and different perspectives and interesting characters who maybe haven’t told a story before. If a lot of the story is personal, I would think you’re in okay territory. I would just ask yourself, what is the icky thing, and can whatever that thing is that’s making you feel a little bit icky change enough so you don’t feel that way?

**John:** I also wonder if Patrick needs to do a little bit more research about this premise and maybe familiarize himself with the idea there’s probably other movies that are doing a similar kind of thing.

**Danielle:** That’s a good idea.

**John:** This may be the first time you’ve encountered this dramatic question being asked in a film, but I bet it wasn’t the first time this was asked. If you do research on this film, you might even find out that this was inspired by something else that came before it.

I’m also thinking back to, I don’t know if you ever saw the Todd Haynes film Far From Heaven. It’s a Julianne Moore movie set in the 1950s. It was very much done in the style of the 1950s, but in a way that you couldn’t have done, addressed those questions in the time.

There’s something about recognizing that you are taking a period idea and examining through a lens which is transforming. It definitely could actually have the same beats as an original thing but actually become so different because of the lens you’re looking at it through that you may not be giving yourself enough credit for the amount of transformation you are enacting on this work.

I get it, Patrick, but I think you need to be a little kinder to yourself and really look at why this idea is so compelling for you and just do some more research around it, but probably do it, because those ideas that you can’t shake are the ones that are definitely worth pursuing.

**Danielle:** I would definitely say write it. For myself, I’ll come up with a million reasons why I don’t write something. Don’t let it stop you. Write it. You could always rewrite it too if you ever hit a bump. I think that’s great advice, John. Don’t let it stop you. I think write it. Just write it.

**John:** Write it. Just write it. Let’s try another one, Drew.

**Drew:** Michelle in San Francisco writes, “Over the years, John and Craig have taught us so much about feature structure, but now that I’m trying to write a limited series that’s six to eight episodes, I’m at a loss for what the structure should be. Could you guys talk about how a TV series should be structured, especially a limited series, and not just the pilot, but the following episodes as well?

“Does each episode need to have the four acts that many people talk about, or is that just the pilot? Do characters really need to have their own arc within each episode or is it okay to just write one long story and delineate episode breaks where there’s a nice cliffhanger-y type endpoint and where it makes sense in terms of page count?”

**John:** Danielle, we have you here to answer this question, because this is what you’ve been doing. Talk to us about the process of structuring your eight-episode series and what you’re thinking about in terms of how much story fits into each episode, act breaks. I don’t know, for Hulu you may actually have to plan for act breaks. For Netflix, you don’t. Talk to us about that structuring of episodes within an eight-episode order.

**Danielle:** Interestingly enough, Netflix now has ads. I don’t know if anyone out there is… I don’t think there is any longer a streamer where that isn’t the case. We were not asked at Netflix to structure in acts, but I structure in acts. I am a writer who always structures in acts.

I think you are always in good shape to think of it in terms of acts, to think of each individual episode in terms of acts and then think of the whole piece, if that’s 8 episodes total or 10, also as one long story, the way that she’s suggesting.

I was given advice early in my career. Things were a little bit more straightforward when I was given this advice. Look at a few limited series that you admire and break it down. Just do a breakdown yourself. Write down each little scene. Just bullet point. For you, look, where do act breaks seem to be, are there act breaks, are there not act breaks. The truth is, I’m sure if you did three or four limited series that you really liked, they wouldn’t all follow form so literally, but I think you need to know form to be able to break form.

I would certainly say, especially early in your career, yes to all the questions, even though you want the answer to be no, because wouldn’t it be easier if every character didn’t have to arc and every episode didn’t have to have four acts?

I learned something interesting. The first streaming show I did was a show called Up Here for Hulu, which is a half-hour romantic comedy musical, Broadway musical. I was working with Bobby Lopez and Kristen Anderson-Lopez, who are the most prolific, talented people, let along songwriters, I’ve ever met. They’re two of the most talented people I’ve ever met. Steven Levenson, we co-wrote the first two episodes. He wrote the book for Dear Evan Hanson, as well as he did Fosse/Verdon for FX. Tommy Kail, who directed Hamilton and also did Fosse/Verdon with Steven… Anyway, these are amazing Broadway musical people who I admired, who I was so excited to work with.

Believe it or not, I am answering this question. I’m on topic. John, I haven’t left the topic. I’m on the topic.

**John:** I have full faith in you.

**Danielle:** It was interesting to do a first streaming show, which is kind of like what this person is writing in asking about. What do I do if I have eight episodes? Something that Bobby and Kristen and Steven really taught me was… They’re like, “We’re going to make eight mini musicals. Each episode is going to have to work on its own as a musical,” which is just a way of storytelling. Basically, they’re saying it has to work as a story on its own, with these elements of music. Then they’re all going to have to make one long musical. It’s all going to have to add up to one long musical. Again, same as I think what this person is asking about a limited series, it all has to add up to one long movie, or however you want to think about it.

What that does, and what that did for Up Here, and I certainly used it to make Survival of the Thickest, and I think every streaming show moving forward I’ll really get, but it was interesting to think of it in Broadway musical terms, is four or five is a midpoint. That’s the middle of your movie. That’s the middle of your story, and so you’re looking for something to really change significantly. There is some sort of moment that’s going to shift your world.

However you’ve learned the craft of storytelling, whether that’s save the cat or you have an MFA or whatever, you learned how a movie breaks down or what works, and so I think you look at it those ways. Even though it sounds daunting, and all the questions you asked are like, does it have to do this, this, this, this, and the answers are yes, it really just needs a beginning, a middle, and an end. That’s what it needs. It needs to play that way.

I think no matter which way you approached it, if you thought of it as a long-form eight-episode, which seems daunting to me, but if you just wrote it with no act breaks and no anything, I think you would find that your brain naturally put them in, because you know a story has to turn.

Even if you’re just a watcher of television or movies, you understand story structure. You know what’s happening. You know when you need to feel what you need to feel and when you need to shift things.

The answer is yes, but I think there’s just no other way of doing it, because I’ve always wanted to be that person who can just sit down and not need an outline. I just want to write, man. I just want to let it flow, man. I’m not that person. I believe that maybe there are a handful of those people out there in the world. Structure is storytelling. Even little kids, when you tell them a story, you read them a book, there’s some amount of structure. They understand what a story is.

I would really just think of it as beginning, middle, end, but apply those rules, because they’ll help you. For me, act breaks help me understand balance. Is the story misbalanced? Is there too much at the top and not enough at the end? Is there no middle? For comedy, it’s three-act. We work in more of a three-act structure, although sometimes it’s a four-act structure. You just need to understand, am I turning things, is it interesting. For me, that’s act breaks. That’s how I get it.

**John:** In Episode 584 we had Taffy Brodesser-Akner on to talk about Fleishman Is in Trouble. She was adapting her own book into the limited series. It was fascinating to hear her talk about. The limited series is exactly the book. Everything that happens in them happens in both. Figuring out how you break those into episodes and how there’s growth and change within an episode, and it feels like this episode has really started, this episode has finished, is a thing she had to learn.

She was lucky to have Susannah Grant and Susannah Grant’s producing partner on to really help with that initial stage of figuring out how to structure this into individual episodes and how to make the gross of the characters and gross of the story really make sense over that limited time, which seems like it would be so different than going back to earlier shows you worked on, like My Name is Earl or The Carmichael Show. You might have some sense at the start of the season, like, this is where we’re going to, but you’re really probably thinking much more episode by episode, aren’t you?

**Danielle:** Absolutely, yeah. I think it’s called episodic TV for a reason. I think that in those scenarios, we’re making 22, 24, 26 episodes in a season, and broadcast network is designed… I’ll speak a little bit more for comedy here, because I think there are dramas where this wouldn’t apply. I don’t remember what the numbers were or what they said, but a viewer who loved the show watches every third or fourth episode on broadcast network.

**John:** Wow.

**Danielle:** That may be an antiquated way of thinking, but I know when I was coming up in my career, that’s what we were told. It has to be designed to drop in and see it this week but not see it next week. They really have to be self-contained episodes, even though our favorite shows that we grew up watching, pick your favorite show, had arcs, usually love stories. That’ll take you through Jim and Pam and Sam and Diane for me, for my all-time favorite show, which is Cheers. You could miss some and still get it.

I think that the streaming model is different, and that’s not how people are consuming it, and that’s not how it’s meant to be consumed. You shouldn’t be able to miss the third one, because I think you’re supposed to be told one long story. I think the goal is completion, for people to watch all of your episodes. That’s not necessarily the goal of broadcast network, by and large. I think cable is probably a little bit more of the streaming model than not, storytelling-wise. I think that you’re meant to sit down and watch every one.

**John:** I think in cable you see both kinds of things. You definitely see the ongoing progress of some storylines, but there’s also shows like the USA shows, which were very much, you could catch one, not catch one. There’s not huge growth between the two of them if you missed that one episode. Both things can work.

I loved Star Trek: The Next Generation growing up. It was one of my very favorite shows. Watching the third season of Picard, which is basically just Star Trek: The Next Generation but if it was done as a limited series, you have to watch it in order because there’s very specific builds and revelations and tweaks. It’s just fascinating to watch the difference between how a show works if an episode is all self-contained versus an ongoing limited series. They’re both great, but it feels like Picard is definitely the 2023 version of how you would tell that story.

**Danielle:** What’s amazing for I think us as storytellers is that all of those options are on the table. It really is, what do you want to tell and how do you want to tell it? Okay, then here’s the form for you.

I think we’re spending a lot of time talking about what’s not working and what’s broken in the industry. There’s a lot of exciting, amazing things as storytellers for us out there. We just need to get the ship righted a little bit. It’s amazing that there’s a lot of outlets and a lot of ways to tell stories now, completely different from when I started my career, you tell me, John, but I think in features and in television, both.

**John:** Obviously in features, the writers had traditionally less direct say in this is my vision for how stuff is going to go, whereas TV showrunners often had that sort of initial creator entrepreneurial vision for what a thing is. In features, we also have independent film. We have the ability to make things at incredibly small levels and just really experiment with a form. That’s a thing that is sometimes more challenging in TV, because you have to find a home for that thing versus being able to make it on your own and sell it. Drew, let’s get a new question.

**Drew:** Danielle, you mentioned love stories. We have an email from Marvin in Germany. Marvin writes, “I’m a young screenwriter currently working on my first big project. Without going into too much detail, there’s a love triangle in it. I was wondering, how can I analyze for myself or for the demands of the scene if it’s really necessary to explicitly show the action? Should I go into those intimate scenes or just hint at them without showing too much? Sometimes in romantic films, I like to see the protagonists finally getting together, but on the other hand, intimate scenes are often kind of sexist, and I don’t want to put my actresses and actors in a weird position where they need to flash.”

**John:** Explicitness. There’s a new TV adaptation of Fatal Attraction I’m really excited to see. I’ll be curious both how explicit the show is on screen but also what those scenes look like on the page, because I feel like most of the times when I see something made in 2023, what’s on the screen is also reflected on the page.

Danielle, what do you see? How explicit are you seeing stuff being written in scripts? Obviously, the comedies you’re making, maybe it’s not such a factor, but what are you thinking?

**Danielle:** There was a show called Normal People, which was an adaptation of a book for Hulu. That was really the first time as a creator I started thinking about… Because I spend so much time doing broadcast network too. We were not showing anything on broadcast network. When I watched that show, it was so intimate and beautiful and beautifully acted and beautifully shot and beautifully written and a really true adaptation of the book. That was the first time I had read… There was an article I think that came out after about an intimacy coordinator, which is a crew position now that I think we didn’t always have and now I think we always have.

When I was talking earlier about listening to your gut and that we get paid for our gut, which doesn’t sound elegant but I think is true. You as the writer, this person who’s creating this world, I think will ultimately need to listen to their own instincts about what is necessary to tell the story.

I agree that we have seen so much sexist content for decades in movies and this. In the ’80s, which was my era of growing up, watching movies, there was always boobs. It was just like, oh, here’s boobs. It’s going to be boobs. If it’s a comedy, there’s going to be boobs. Why? Why is that the case? I think that there are so many interesting ways to tell a story and tell an intimate scene.

What I would encourage this writer to do is think of it through a different lens. How have you not seen it? What have you bristled at that you’ve seen? What is the story you’re telling? What is the intimate moment that you might want to tell that maybe isn’t nudity at all, or maybe it is but it’s just in…

I thought Normal People, just to go back to the original point, just did something, made these two characters… The whole series was about connecting and connection and that these two people keep being drawn back to each other. The intimacy was really necessary and I think well done.

I appreciate that this writer is thinking about ultimately putting an actor in front of a camera, because now that I’m making streaming, having shot recently with my partner, co-creator, and muse of Survival of the Thickest, a stand-up named Michelle Buteau… That is based on a book of essays that she wrote. There’s a really funny chunk in there that’s about sexual encounters and when she was single. We’re inspired by a lot of what there was.

You write a certain thing, but then you get there to shoot it, and you’re like, “Oh, my goodness. Now we’re really doing this.” When I’m asking two actors to go be brave… Michelle is the bravest of the brave, and an amazing actress, comedically and dramatically.

One of the things that we were excited about doing with that show, in terms of what I’m suggesting, thinking about it through different lenses or whatever… If you’ve not seen this, Michelle is a plus-sized, beautiful woman, which is where the title Survival of the Thickest comes from. We wanted to show her in intimate scenes. We wanted her to be the star, the one who is in the love triangle and is having sex and is having all of these encounters, because we felt like that wasn’t being shown enough, that that’s just not the person who is always front and center in a show, especially as a woman. We wanted to make sure that character was a very sexual character, not that the show is super R-rated or anything, but it was really important to us, so we had a reason for it.

I guess my best advice would be, have a reason for what you’re doing and know why you’re doing it. If there is no reason, then you’re right, it will be gratuitous and unnecessary.

**John:** If you’re writing a love triangle story, there’s good odds that the sex that you want to put in the story is not going to be gratuitous. Then you have to think about, what is it about this moment that’s going to be interesting? What am I actually going to want to look at and show in this thing?

Ultimately, anything that’s going to show up on screen needs to be on the page. It can be awkward at times to put that stuff down there, but someone has to make those decisions. If you don’t make those decisions, those decisions are going to be made for you by somebody else, by directors or other people, and it may not be what the story actually needs. I think you have to start with what’s on the page.

Then it gets to a process of a director, an intimacy coordinator, and actors, and hopefully you involved as well, about what is the story point of this moment, to make sure it’s really reflecting the goals of the scene.

I would just say, again, follow your gut, but I also say be brave. You’re telling this story for a reason. Make sure all these scenes are really helping to tell the story you’re trying to tell. Let’s do a simpler question, if we can. How about something on intercutting?

**Drew:** Jared writes, “Formatting question. I’m intercutting between two different conversations occurring at the same time, say between Bob and Steve and Sarah and Tina. After I’ve established scene headings once for each conversation, it looks very odd to then just have a string of conversations without anything in between. It might be difficult for the reader to discern who is talking to whom, especially if only one person speaks before jumping to the other conversation. Would it be preferred in this multi-party intercut to just include scene headings every time the conversation switches?”

**John:** Danielle, what’s your instinct here? What do you tend to do when you’re having to intercut between two different conversations or two different scenes?

**Danielle:** It is tricky, and it’s a frustrating as a writer when you’re like, “I just need you to understand what’s in my head. I just need you to understand what’s happening here.” I don’t think that there’s only one way to do it. I think there’s multiple ways to do it.

I just try and make it as easy as possible for the reader. I think a lot of times readers skip action that might be explaining, which sounds crazy, but I just think they skip action that might be explaining it to you. I feel like scene headers probably just really will get the eye and the brain to go, “Now I’m in a different setting. Now I’m in a different setting. Now I’m in a different setting. Now I’m in a different setting.”

I understand that it may hurt the rhythm of the page a little bit, but I think clarity is what’s important. You don’t want someone to have to go back up and go, “What did I just read? I don’t understand. Where is anybody, and what’s going on?” You want your reader and ultimately your audience to be smart, but you also have to prepare for if that’s not the case.

**John:** I agree that you need to make sure that a person who might skip that little notification that we’re intercutting two scenes still gets the point of what’s going on there. You can obviously bold the intercutting there if it’s helpful.

What I find is often most useful is, rather than doing a full INT. BAR, NIGHT and INT. HOUSE, DAY, that you’re cutting between those two spaces, just go like, “Back at the bar,” dash dash, “Back at the house,” because whenever you see an INT., I think you naturally think, oh, it’s a whole brand new scene, we’re in a whole brand new place.

If you’re just intercutting between two places, doing the intermediary slug line, it’s not really a scene header, might be a way just to let the reader understand, okay, that’s right, we’re jumping back and forth between these two conversations.

It’s again one of those things you’re going to feel on the page that you won’t know until you see situationally how it’s going to work. If these are two-page scenes and you’re intercutting between the two of them, that’s more probably a scene header situation for me. If it’s quick rapid fire between two things, then the shortest little things are going to be probably your friend.

Cool. Let’s try two more questions. What do you got for us, Drew?

**Drew:** Carl asks, “How can I warn a reader that I’m not being cliché, but I want the viewer to say in their mind, ‘Ugh, so cliché.’ For example, a boy goes back to their hometown and sees his former hometown love. Their eyes lock, and the viewer thinks it’s the standard love story scene a thousand times, but within a few beats it’s made clear that this isn’t the case. Should I be worried about a reader losing interest and putting the screenplay down upon reading the cliché or am I over-thinking this?”

**John:** Danielle, this must come up all the time in comedies that you’re writing, which is basically you’re playing with a trope. You’re definitely trying to set up the expectation like, oh, it’s this kind of thing, but it’s not this kind of thing. How do you deal with that?

**Danielle:** I think in comedy, I will make the action line funny. I will say, “Sit with me here. It’s not going to do what you think it’s going to do,” in a parenthetical or something, if that feels appropriate to you. I don’t know exactly what this piece is, but if that feels appropriate.

I’ve worked a with lot of stand-ups. Like I said, Michelle Buteau is the last person that I just worked with. She writes the funniest action lines I’ve ever read. It’s almost like you’re having a dialog with her in her voice.

I think that you can be entertaining, and I think you can get your point across by… If you’re trying not to be cliché but you have this tone you’re trying to achieve, if you can achieve that tone in an action line, I think that that can be really helpful for you and might entertain the reader.

I don’t know if it’s pages of cliché until you get to the turn, but I’m assuming it’s not. I’m assuming it’s fairly quickly that you get to the turn. I also wouldn’t be too worried about a reader tuning out because it’s something they’ve seen. Everything is something they’ve seen before to some degree, with twists in there. I wouldn’t be too worried about that, but I would suggest trying to get it across in the action line.

**John:** Totally. Carl says here it’s like a boy goes back to hometown, sees the hometown love, their eyes lock. You’re going to have moments in there where you can really signal to the reader, yes, this is the most cliché moment possible. By setting that up, the punchline for how it’s not going to be that is going to be more rewarding. You’ll be fine. Don’t worry about that.

The ability to communicate tone through scene description is such a crucial craft skill you pick up over time and one of those things which, if this were a show rather than a movie, you’d learn the house style for how you do these things.

It’s fascinating to watch how in a given show, the scripts, they have the same voice. They have the same way of working, and you start to understand how to read those scripts. If you read a Lost script, the Lost scripts, no matter who’s writing them, all sound like they’re from the same person, because their house style develops. Part of that house style will be how ironic you are, what happens in the scene descriptions, how much caps are being used, and teaches you how to read those scripts.

If you were doing this as a feature, you have to do all that work from the start, basically letting the reader understand how to read your style, your script. That’s why those first couple pages are so crucial, to make the reader feel confident that you are going to be leading them on a journey that’s going to be worthwhile.

Drew, I said a craft question, but I see a business question here which I actually have the answer for, so let’s skip ahead to our Australian Sam.

**Drew:** Sam in Australia writes, “I loved your recent episode with Megana and her cluelessness about how to write a check. I feel her pain pretty hard. I’m a writer based in Australia who wrote on my first US show a couple of years ago. I was completely delighted to start receiving those glorious residual checks from the WGA until I learned that there’s absolutely no way in my country to cash them. All the big Australian banks have stopped taking overseas checks, rightly believing that they should become extinct, and so now I’ve got about six residual checks sitting on my desk staring at me. I tried sending them to my US agent, but they got lost in an accounts vortex, and I had to get a lovely man at the WGA to reissue them before they were lost forever. Why can’t residuals be electronically transferred? Surely that would be cheaper than all that postage.”

**John:** Oh, residuals. Danielle, do you love residuals?

**Danielle:** Oh, me. Who doesn’t love residuals? With all my heart I love them.

**John:** You open your mailbox. You see that green envelope. You’re like, “Oh my gosh.” There’s just some money in there. You don’t know what it’s for. You don’t know how big it’s going to be. It can be just wonderful and something you’ve forgot you ever worked on. Suddenly there’s a residual check. It’s a nice thing.

**Danielle:** Absolutely.

**John:** The problem that our Australian friend is having here is that Australia basically doesn’t deal with paper checks anymore. It’s just not a thing that exists there. I asked on Twitter for other international listeners what they’re doing, and actually some Australians wrote back in. The best advice I got was to just get a US account and deposit all of your residual checks there in a US account and then transfer the money out. That’s probably good advice for most situations, but it could be a weird case of tax things, so don’t do that until you actually check with somebody who actually knows about taxes for that.

I also got a recommendation from a guy named Jason Reed, who says, “The only bank I’ve found that’ll process US dollar paper checks is RACQ Bank. Just make sure to do it within 90 days of it being issued.”

I don’t know how much longer we’re going to have paper checks, residual checks. It’s a thing that does come up. Without tipping anything, I think both the studios and the writers would love for this to happen. It’s just a matter of getting it all figured out and how to make sure we do it in a way that has clear accounting. Danielle, what’s your thought? Your weekly checks for working on a show, are those still check checks or are those direct deposited for you right now?

**Danielle:** I know you want me to know the answer to this, John. How is that money collected? I think they’re paper checks.

**John:** I think they’re still paper checks. I think that they’re probably going through one of the payroll services companies, and they’re still paper checks. That’s a thing that, yes, it can and should change. Drew’s checks I know are electronic. Correct, Drew?

**Drew:** Correct.

**John:** We were able to figure that out. We go through a payroll services company that was able to direct deposit into his account. It’s tough because as writers were working on a project or with a company for a short period of time. It’s not like we are a years-long employee of the Disney Corporation, where we can set everything up. There’s only a couple payroll services companies. It feels like it’s a thing that we should be able to figure out, because they know who you are and they know your tax ID number. It should be doable.

**Danielle:** Absolutely. I pay myself digitally, because a lot of writers are their own companies, their own LLCs.

**John:** That’s right.

**Danielle:** I don’t give myself a check. I know that much. That just goes right into the account.

**John:** We love that. Those are a lot of good questions. We still have plenty of good questions left over, so Craig and I will tackle those later on. Before we get to One Cool Things, I have a correction for last week’s episode.

I talked about Jefferson Mays and that I’d seen him in I Am My Own Wife. I said that he’s written I Am My Own Wife, which is crazy, because I know he didn’t. Doug Wright, who I know from Sundance, he wrote I Am My Own Wife. He’s an incredibly talented playwright. He is the person who wrote I Am My Own Wife. Jefferson Mays is a talented star of it, but Doug Wright is the playwright who wrote it. Doug Wright also has Good Night, Oscar, starring Sean Hayes, on Broadway. Doug Wright, not Jefferson Mays.

I was wrong. I just want to make sure that it gets publicly into the record that I was wrong just this once, on an episode that Craig is not a part of and not listening to. It’s time for our One Cool Things. Danielle, what do you got for us?

**Danielle:** I have an Instagram account. Glucose Goddess is her name. She is a French biochemist. She has one book out and another book coming out I think in May. I am always looking for ways to be healthy, because I think this job certainly does its best to challenge that, to challenge staying healthy, especially when you’re in season, making a television show.

Her account is all about keeping your glucose spikes level and not having huge spikes, which sounds like a very small thing. This isn’t about weight loss. This is just about general health. Apparently, your glucose levels have a lot to do with disease predictors and all kinds of things. I don’t know how cool it is, but she’s very cool. It’s a very fun thing.

Her first book is 10 hacks about keeping the spikes level. I’m trying them for fun, because I’m like, what could it hurt? What could it hurt? I’m feeling really good using her hacks. That is my Cool Thing, Glucose Goddess on Instagram.

**John:** Nice. I would say something that is not helpful for glucose spikes would be the candy closet in the negotiating room.

**Danielle:** A hundred percent, but you know what I’ve been doing? I’ve been looking at the nuts. The other thing is… I’ll just keep telling you about her hacks. If this is interesting to no one, I apologize to your listeners. She’s not an anti-dessert, anti-sweet. Again, this is not about weight loss. This is about general health. If there’s something in the candy closet I want, one of the hacks is to have savory snacks but save the sweets for dessert. What she would suggest is I put that candy bar in my purse, and after dinner, with a full meal, I eat the dessert. Even that is like, yeah, that candy closet, there’s a way to do it.

**John:** There’s always a way to do it. My thing is also a food-related One Cool Thing. I think I’ve talked before on the podcast that my favorite pancake recipe is this one that Jason Kottke has up on his blog, which is a buttermilk pancake recipe. It’s really great. It’s really great if you have buttermilk, but so often you just don’t have buttermilk and you want to make pancakes. I found this other recipe, which is also really, really good, that uses just milk, but you also put two tablespoons of white vinegar in it, just to sour the milk, to curdle the milk before you make it, which sounds like it would be disgusting, it would taste vinegary.

**Danielle:** It sure does.

**John:** It doesn’t. It’s really good. Actually, it’s very close to the buttermilk pancake recipe and really simple. The pancakes are crispy on the edges in just the perfect ways. If you’re looking for a pancake recipe, I’m going to recommend this. It’s just on All Recipes. It’s delicious. I’ve made it twice, and I highly recommend it. I think pancakes are probably not good for the glucose of it all.

**Danielle:** Can I tell you what she would say?

**John:** What would she say?

**Danielle:** Then if you’re interested, you’ll look it up and see what this means. She would say put a little clothes on your carbs. Put a little clothes on your carbs.

**John:** Does that mean eat a protein with it?

**Danielle:** Yes. You’ve decoded it immediately. She’s just done a ton of research. I like her because she’s coming from a science background. It’s really cool, the experiments she’s done and the science that she… It would drastically change what happens when you eat those delicious pancakes if you put a little bit of clothes on them.

**John:** Hooray. Danielle, before we wrap up here, remind us where we see your programs. Up Here is currently streaming on Hulu?

**Danielle:** Currently streaming on Hulu. All the episodes are up. Watch the eight mini musicals and the one long musical that they all add up to. Then Survival of the Thickest will be premiering on Netflix later this year, 2023.

**John:** Fantastic. That is our show for this week. Scriptnotes is produced by Drew Marquardt. It’s edited by Matthew Chilelli. Our outro this week is by Alicia Jo Rabins. If you have an outro, you can send us a link to ask@johnaugust.com. That’s also the place where you can send questions. You can find the show notes for this episode and all episodes at johnaugust.com. That’s also where you’ll find transcripts and sign up for our weeklyish newsletter called Inneresting, which has lots of links to things about writing. We have T-shirts and hoodies. They’re great. You can find them at Cotton Bureau. You can sign up to become a premium member at scriptnotes.net, where you get all the back-episodes and bonus segments, like the one we’re about to record on people who are incompetent but nice. Danielle, you are nice and not even remotely incompetent. You are so, so competent. Thank you so much for joining us here.

**Danielle:** Thank you, John. It’s such a pleasure to be here. I know there are so many writers who are fans of this podcast. I just think it’s incredible, what you guys do, providing this kind of information. It was such a pleasure to hear your advice.

**John:** Hooray.

**Danielle:** Thank you.

**John:** Thank you.

[Bonus Segment]

**John:** Okay, our bonus segment. It’s a blog I started reading. I don’t even really quite know why. It’s by Jacob Kaplan-Moss. He’s mostly writing about HR and management stuff and things that happen, hiring and firing of stuff.

This one post I thought was really smart, because he talks about how among coworkers or people you’re hiring, people you’re managing, there are two axes you can look at that factor in here. You can look at how good someone is at their job, are they good at their job, or are they bad at their job, and are they nice to work with, so are they nice or are they a jerk.

He breaks it down into four quadrants, that you have people who are good at their job and nice to work with, and those are superstars. You just love them, because they’re so great to have those people. You want all those people around you. You also have people who are good at their job but are kind of jerks. Those would be the brilliant assholes. You might put up with them, but oh my god, they’re hard to work with. You have people who are bad at their jobs and jerks, and you just fire those people. It’s great to fire them.

The most difficult category for his post here was, what do you with somebody who is really nice to work with but just bad at their job? I thought we might spend a few minutes talking about those folks and times in my life where I’ve been that person and how we think about that, because Danielle, you definitely have more experience managing people than I do. Is this a useful quadrant theory for the kinds of people you encounter working on sets, working in rooms? Does this resonate at all with you?

**Danielle:** A hundred percent, and it made me laugh, which is my favorite thing about a graph. I think it’s very funny. Wait, I have to go back to… Which person have you been? What are you saying?

**John:** I’ve been the incompetent but nice.

**Danielle:** No.

**John:** Here’s an example of me being incompetent but nice, because also, I worked as a temp a lot. I was given an assignment to work at this bank in Colorado, maybe Fort Collins, somewhere, or probably Louisville, close to where I grew up in Boulder. They sat me down at this desk. I was just the person at the front desk who just directed people where to go. Within an hour of sitting at that desk, I had set off the silent alarms and the police came. I had no business doing that, being there. I didn’t last long at that job.

**Danielle:** That’s an amazing visual. I love it.

**John:** That’s example.

**Danielle:** Love it. I love that. I think managing people, it’s the craziest thing about all these crazy things that there are in Hollywood. The fact that we’re just, especially for episodic writers, we’re writing in a room, we’re telling jokes, we’re eating the candy, because there’s candy closets on TV shows too, and then all of a sudden you’re in charge of everybody and you’re supposed to be able to manage writers in the writers’ room, but also like you said, the crew, actors.

Not to bring it back to our original point, but hopefully you have had the training to do all that stuff, because if you hadn’t, what kind of chance do you have? I loved this thought. I loved this graph, because I think we’ve probably all worked with, even if you weren’t in charge of the people, people in all of these quadrants.

My rule of thumb with regard to, not even just managing people… This is how I decided to conduct myself when I got to Hollywood. I think I credit my parents for giving me a wonderful foundation of how to treat people and how to demand to be treated. I have three older sisters who are really great role models. I feel like it’s somehow accredited to the foundation. The way I translate it in my head is, whoever I’m dealing with, whatever the hard situation is, I want to be able to run into them in a restaurant a week from now or six weeks from now or six months from now and not have to hide, and be able to say-

**John:** Oh, wow.

**Danielle:** … hello with my head up and have them say hello back to me. When I was working for people in difficult situations, I always thought, okay, I need to go have an honest conversation, be very respectful, and know if I run into them, I don’t want to have to hide, and I don’t want them to hide from me.

Once that became the reverse and I was managing people, I thought the same thing. I was like, okay, whatever happens, you’re going to want to be able to… This is a small town. Comedy is small. You’re going to want to always have good relationships with people.

I’ve definitely worked with people, not just writers, the crew, worked with people who fall into this category. As a manager, I think my job is to make sure that I’m providing for you everything you need to be your best, and I’m creating an environment where you can be your best.

If I’m doing both of those things, which is not a perfect science, because I think we do the best we can, but those are basic philosophies of mine, if I’m doing both of those things and you’re wonderful and you’re not doing well, then I think the next thing I owe to you as a good manager is to come tell you you’re not meeting expectations, whatever those expectations are.

I need to clearly state, “You’re a wonderful person. Everyone loves being around you,” which I’ve had this conversation before, but fill in the blank. Whatever job it is you’re doing here on my show as part of this crew isn’t hitting the mark and here’s why. You have to be able to state where it is that they aren’t being what you would hope they would be, filling a role you’d hope they would fill.

Then you’d give it time. You give it time and you hope that it improves. Then if it doesn’t, I feel like where does that person go? That person ultimately in my world gets fired, but only if they didn’t improve, and only if I really gave them a chance to understand where something was lacking. I think that that’s where that person goes for me.

**John:** We’re mostly a writing podcast, so let’s talk about, let’s say there’s somebody in your room, hopefully a normal room, not a tiny mini room, but whatever. There’s a writer who’s working under your employ who’s just not cutting it, who’s falling into this incompetent, is nice but incompetent category. What are some things that would make you feel like this person’s not living up to their end of the bargain? Is it how much they’re participating in the room? Is it the actual quality of the drafts they’re turning in? What are some things that might lead you to have that conversation with them?

**Danielle:** It could be both of those things. One thing is they’re just not getting the tone of the show like everyone else. That could be in room participation, like you said, or in drafts, like you also said, that I have seven people in a room, and six of them are really pitching things that are getting in or at least make sense or are landing with me or feel like they’re in the world of the show, and one person is not hitting that target. The target should be fairly generous, certainly in the beginning of something, but their things are just not the same tone.

With comedy, every show has a tone, a very distinct tone. Maybe you’re collaborating to make it, but once everyone’s on the same page, which as a writer I think you would know… Look, all of our pitches get turned down all day long, myself included. I turn my own pitches down all day, like, “That’s not good. That’s not good. That’s not good.” You know when you hit one that’s good.

If you find yourself in that position where you feel like nothing’s getting in, then it shouldn’t necessarily come as a surprise if someone were to tell you, “Let’s talk about what this show is and the direction that it’s moving and why is everything you’re pitching dark or sad,” or I don’t know, I’m just filling in the blank of whatever this is. “This is trying to be light.”

I would say it’s about is it hitting a target, is the script hitting a target, are the story pitches hitting a target. That’s at least the most difficult one to deal with, because it’s the most nuanced.

If you’re just not doing work, if you’re just not spending time on a draft, but you’re nice, but you’re not working hard, that’s a much easier thing to deal with. You’re just not working hard. You’re not working hard enough. Most people are working hard I think in this category and just not hitting the mark.

I think the conversation would be… Give them specifics. “You pitched this, and we were talking about this storyline. You pitched this. We were talking about this storyline. You did this with the B story that you were sent off with, but really that’s outside of what we were trying to send you off to do.” I really think you have to be specific with people if you want them to improve.

Anyone in this little quadrant I would want to improve, because if I like them, that’s a lot. If they’re fun to be around and everyone likes them, that is really valuable, especially in a writers’ room. That’s something that really matters. My first hope would be that I could get this person on course.

I think my advice to someone who might be receiving this information is to try not to be defensive, even though that’s a painful thing to hear. I’ve been told I’ve been off course. There have been jobs I haven’t gotten that I wanted and all those things. There’s so much rejection in our business.

The best thing to do would be to receive it and really think about what is it, what is happening, because I think there are a lot of things that can improve and are correctable. Not everything, but if given an opportunity, I would expect that person would try and listen more and get on track for where the show was headed, because being nice is great, but the quadrant that’s the talented asshole, that person’s working all the time. That’s the truth about Hollywood. That person is working all the time.

**John:** Let’s get back to the things that are correctable and things that aren’t correctable, because this blog post is really talking about some sort of tech management kind of thing. Some of the solutions that he offers are like, okay, maybe this person needs more training or they need to take a break to do a thing.

In the case of a writer who’s in the writers’ room, some of what you’re describing sounds like a person who just doesn’t get it. I worry, I wonder, and maybe you have much more experience about this than I do, if a writer just doesn’t get it, doesn’t get the tone, doesn’t get what it is that you need, is that correctable in your experience? Have you been able to have that conversation and get that writer back on track?

**Danielle:** I think it depends how far off they are. Again, I’m really focusing on the creative, because that’s the hardest, most nuanced part of it, because I think if you’re talking too much, if you’re cutting people off, even if you’re likable and you’re doing those things, which is conversations I’ve had, those are a little bit easier. You know those things are correctable. You choose to do it or you don’t.

I think the sad reality of this is, if someone is way off, they’re not going to get back on. That person in that quadrant is going to be fired from that show. There are a lot of talented people who have been fired from shows because they didn’t fit that, especially if they were nice. They didn’t fit that. They didn’t fit the thing that you were trying to do. It depends on the level too.

I’ve been very lucky to work for showrunners who were really mentors. Greg Garcia, who’s a creator of My Name is Earl and many other shows, really mentored me. Everyone I’ve worked for, from my first job to the last time I was on staff, I’ve been really, really lucky. I know there are a lot of people who are really unlucky, who’ve worked with some people who suck and who aren’t looking at the next generation and aren’t considering how they got to where they got. I’ve been wildly lucky to work for people who have really taken the time to talk to me when I was young, to give me responsibility when I was young, and to let me see things. I think it is especially correctable if it’s a younger writer who just no one stopped and told them.

My parents grew up in East LA, but I always joke, I’m like, “It’s as far away from Hollywood as it could possibly be.” If you have nothing to do with Hollywood, you have nothing to do with Hollywood. I had no role models coming in. I had no nepotism. I wish I did. I have a niece who’s writing now. I’m all for nepotism. Let’s go. Let’s bring the whole family into the business. I had nothing. I had nothing and no one to look to. Luckily, I got my MFA at UCLA, because I’m a nerd, and so school was the road to be like, “I don’t know anything about Hollywood. Let me see.” Unless someone is kind enough to tell you, you might be off in terms of how you’re pitching your tone or whatever because nobody stopped to tell you.

I took a class at UCLA taught by a man named Fred Rubin, who changed my whole world. It was a sitcom writing class. It was actually in the MFA program. I was in the producers program, but they let us in. They let us audition in. Andrew Goldberg was in my class at UCLA taught by this guy, Fred Rubin. It just opened a world for me.

I was always trying to figure out, what is the dream? My parents set a goal for my sisters and I, “Wake up every day and love what you do.” When I took Fred Rubin’s class, everything just clicked. I was like, “Oh, this is it. This is what I’ve always anted to do. This is what I’ve been training to do with my loud, funny family where the best joke won the night.” It was like this, this, this. I was so lucky to find him, to find his class, to have someone tell me. There I had school, and then I had great mentors.

I want the door to be way, way, way, way open. When you way, way open the door, you have to also prep people and make sure that someone is stopping and telling them. I think we have amazing people, especially in the Guild, John, some amazing people who are mentoring young writers and really working for the cause of making sure people understand. It’s all related. We’re talking about eliminating so many things from the process and people not having access to production, writers not having access to production and post, and they only have 12 to 20 weeks, and then they have to go find another job.

I guess what I’m saying is, bringing it all back to this idea and the people who in the quadrant, they just might not know. The way of mentorship is really… We’re at a very dangerous brink here of losing being able to show people how to do that. I do think that there are things that might appear to a showrunner to be like you just don’t get it, when really someone didn’t stop and say, “Here’s what we’re trying to do. Do you even know that that’s… ” I don’t mean in a condescending way. I mean truly in a like, “Here’s what we’re trying to do. Here’s what the mission is. Here’s what TV writing is.”

There was a really cool guy that got up and spoke in the meeting last night and was just talking about what his experience is. He was writing on Zoom from his apartment in Brooklyn with no heat. I hope that was a very nurturing environment. Someone’s got to tell you how to do it. Someone has to tell you what the expectations are.

That’s the version I think in this chart that can really be addressed. I think if we look hard enough, what you might be doing is dismissing as so out of the box something that you could bring in if you could just get them aligned. The fact that they’re not thinking like everyone else is great, would be hugely helpful to your show and to the characters, but you’ve got to understand what’s going on and why they’re missing the mark. I guess that’s what I’m saying. I think a good manager investigates that, versus just being like, “You’re nice, but you suck,” because that might not be the truth.

**John:** Circling back to our initial conversation about these writers being cut out of the production and post-production process, I think you’re going to see a larger group of people who are now suddenly having their own shows, who are nice but incompetent at certain functions of it because they’ve just never been exposed to it.

They don’t know how to cover a set. They don’t know how to do post and how to look at that director’s cut and not vomit, and instead, recognize these are the things that aren’t working. It’s not that the director is incompetent. It’s just that it’s not what you need for the show and how to have that conversation with the director and then the editor to get to the cut that you actually need. There’s going to be a whole generation of these writers who just don’t have the experience.

That’s a case where having a mentor who could say, “Okay, that didn’t work. Let’s talk about why that didn’t work. Here’s what you need to know about this part of the process.” I just worry we’re not going to have people to do that mentoring and the time to do that mentoring. I just don’t know we’re going to have a structure where that makes sense. I just really see a train wreck coming 5, 10 years down the road, probably less than that, if we don’t really address some of these problems right now.

**Danielle:** I know. It’s happening now. I think you talked about it a little bit earlier. We hit it already. There are co-APs that haven’t been on sets before. If they have, they’ve only been on set, which is a great only. At least they’ve been on set, I should say. It’s very hard to teach someone post. You understand post by doing years and years of posts.

**John:** It’s feel.

**Danielle:** There’s so much instinct that is happening in the storytelling. I am so grateful that I could look at something that someone, let’s say an executive, might deem a mess and go, “This cut is terrible. Whatever cut this was, it’s terrible,” and I can just see my way through it and be like, “I know it’s not. I was there when we shot it. It’s not terrible. What you’re not getting, I can fix, I can fix with ADR. I can just zero in on what you’re not getting. I know I can fix it.”

The only reason I can do that is because, just to take one of the many shows I’ve worked on, but New Girl. Just one of the most talented staffs I’ve ever worked on, and I only worked on one season of that show. We watched every cut as a group, and then we did notes as a group, and then we wrote jokes. You had to give Liz Meriwether and Dave Finkel and Brett Baer, who are the amazing people who ran that show… Liz created it, obviously, and Finkel and Baer ran it with her. You had to give them jokes. We were rewriting.

I went to work on it because I was such a huge fan of it. I was like, “I love this show.” I think generations continue to love that show. So much work was put into the craft of that show. Post, it was fun. We watched it together. There was a viewing of a cut. Then whether it was your episode or not, we all pitched jokes and did all of these things.

Those are the things that it’s impossible to teach someone. It’s not impossible to teach someone some things to understand about post, but that is a skill that comes from experience. We did the same thing on My Name is Earl, which was a show that used VoiceOver. So much work was done in post, so we saw so many cuts together and had notes on everybody’s cuts, because that’s just what you did, because writing is still happening. I think that’s the thing that we’re really trying to get across is that writing is happening through this whole process.

**John:** From your description of it, it sounds like the process of making those two shows, you got through it for eight episodes, killing yourself. It was not sustainable to do more episodes, to do a second season. It wouldn’t have worked. It took everything you had to get what was there.

**Danielle:** Yeah. I didn’t run Up Here. Steven Levenson is the one who killed himself. I don’t want to speak for him, but I think I can. I was there. I was there watching. The person who was running the show has everything on their shoulders, all of the rewriting. I was available to him, but he didn’t have another writer. He was doing everything.

Like I said, I had Grace Edwards on Survival of the Thickest, and I had Michelle Buteau, but again, she was supposed to be acting in front of the camera, but she was still doing writing, because there was just so much.

When I hear what you said Jesse Armstrong said about Succession, the idea that I could have three writers on that set… Our staff was amazingly talented. We had stand-ups. We had all these different perspectives. We were tiny but an amazing staff. If I could’ve had all of them, that would’ve been the best version. If I could’ve had three writers on that set, it would’ve changed everything. It would’ve changed everything. There were three very talented writers there every day, but they were being asked to do 27 things.

I’m so used to the system where you can call a writers’ room and go, “This scene isn’t working,” or, “We need this,” or, “You know what? We figured out this actor. We need to write into this for this talented actor who wasn’t even cast, by the way, when we had our room.”

There’s almost so many flaws that we can’t even talk about them all. We’re not really doing table reads in comedy. Some shows have figured out how to do some. I managed to get some done, but I didn’t get all eight done. I didn’t have the cast. There are so many things that are very correctable. We’ve done it before. We know how to do it. I don’t think they’re very costly.

The upside, everything that you’re saying, and the concern you have and you know I share and everyone on our negotiating committee shares, as well as the thousands of members that we have, is these are big concerns. We can’t let his happen, because if this happens, what is the future? The young writer who stood up and worked for The Bear, what does it look like for him? Like he said, this is about his next 10 years, his next 20 years.

I had my last 20 years, and I’m still struggling in this system, but I know I’m going to survive. I know I’m going to survive, because I can make demands that everybody can’t make. Even in that, I can’t make all the demands. Even in that, I’m told no. I know I’m not going to make another show this way, but that’s not going to be true for everybody else.

It’s the reason why I said yes to be on a negotiating committee. I’m so comfortable on my couch doing nothing, including not doing podcasts. I’m just comfortable sitting on my couch watching TV under a blanket, but I’m getting out into the world and doing things because I’m so motivated for change. This can’t be how we move forward. It can’t be how we move forward. I think we can change it, and I think we will, John. I think we will.

**John:** I think we will, you and me and 10,000 members and some good fortune.

**Danielle:** That’s it.

**John:** We’ll change it.

**Danielle:** That’s it.

**John:** Danielle, thanks again.

**Danielle:** Thank you.

Links:

* [Danielle Sanchez-Witzel](https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1294678/) on IMDb.
* [Up Here](https://www.hulu.com/series/up-here-3cf5b24c-f13d-4943-8c73-e0e27de4cff5) on Hulu.
* [Succession Podcast, S4E2 with Lucy Prebble and Laura Wasser](https://youtu.be/xvcVqDDceKU) from HBO.
* [Incompetent but Nice](https://jacobian.org/2023/mar/28/incompetent-but-nice/) by Jacob Kaplan-Moss.
* [Glucose Goddess](https://www.instagram.com/glucosegoddess/) on Instagram.
* [Non-Buttermilk Pancake Recipe](https://www.allrecipes.com/recipe/162760/fluffy-pancakes/)
* [Get a Scriptnotes T-shirt!](https://cottonbureau.com/people/scriptnotes-podcast)
* [Check out the Inneresting Newsletter](https://inneresting.substack.com/)
* [Gift a Scriptnotes Subscription](https://scriptnotes.supportingcast.fm/gifts) or [treat yourself to a premium subscription!](https://scriptnotes.supportingcast.fm/)
* [Craig Mazin](https://www.instagram.com/clmazin/) on Instagram
* [John August](https://twitter.com/johnaugust) on Twitter
* [John on Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/johnaugust/?hl=en)
* [John on Mastodon](https://mastodon.art/@johnaugust)
* [Outro](http://johnaugust.com/2013/scriptnotes-the-outros) by Alicia Jo Rabins ([send us yours!](http://johnaugust.com/2014/outros-needed))
* Scriptnotes is produced by Drew Marquardt and edited by [Matthew Chilelli](https://twitter.com/machelli).

Email us at ask@johnaugust.com

You can download the episode [here](http://traffic.libsyn.com/scriptnotes/595standard.mp3).

How Writing Credits Work, Rebroadcast

Episode - 193

Go to Archive

March 28, 2023 Scriptnotes

In an extensive deep-dive, John and Craig attempt to create the definitive explanation of screenwriting credits. How are they determined? Who has copyright? And what really happens when a screenplay goes to arbitration?

In our bonus segment for premium members, we look back on the 2023 awards season and pitch a potential awards show of our own.

Links:

* [WGA Additional Literary Material Credit](https://www.wga.org/contracts/credits/manuals/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-new-additional-literary-material-credit)
* [Scriptnotes, Ep 20: How credit arbitration works](http://johnaugust.com/2012/how-credit-arbitration-works)
* [Jurassic World Script Credits Resolved; Helmer Colin Trevorrow Speaks On Arbitration Process](http://deadline.com/2015/04/jurassic-world-script-credits-resolved-colin-trevorrow-speaks-on-arbitration-process-1201406086/) on Deadline
* [Big Fish poster](http://netdna.webdesignerdepot.com/uploads/2013/04/BigFish.jpg)
* [WGAw Screen Credits Manual](https://www.wga.org/uploadedfiles/credits/manuals/screenscredits_manual18.pdf)
* [WGAw Credits Department contact information](https://www.wga.org/the-guild/about-us/contact-us/departments/credits)
* [WGAw residuals look up](https://my.wga.org/home/Login.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2fhome%2fresiduals.aspx)
* [Get a Scriptnotes T-shirt!](https://cottonbureau.com/people/scriptnotes-podcast)
* [Check out the Inneresting Newsletter](https://inneresting.substack.com/)
* [Gift a Scriptnotes Subscription](https://scriptnotes.supportingcast.fm/gifts) or [treat yourself to a premium subscription!](https://scriptnotes.supportingcast.fm/)
* [Craig Mazin](https://www.instagram.com/clmazin/) on Instagram
* [John August](https://twitter.com/johnaugust) on Twitter
* [John on Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/johnaugust/?hl=en)
* [John on Mastodon](https://mastodon.art/@johnaugust)
* [Outro](http://johnaugust.com/2013/scriptnotes-the-outros) by Rajesh Naroth ([send us yours!](http://johnaugust.com/2014/outros-needed))
* Scriptnotes is produced by Stuart Friedel and [Drew Marquardt](https://www.instagram.com/marquardtam/), and edited by [Matthew Chilelli](https://twitter.com/machelli).

Email us at ask@johnaugust.com

You can download the episode [here](http://traffic.libsyn.com/scriptnotes/193Bstandard.mp3).

Scriptnotes, Episode 586: Against Vagina Monsters, Transcript

March 16, 2023 Scriptnotes Transcript

The original post for this episode can be found [here](https://johnaugust.com/2023/against-vagina-monsters).

**John August:** Hello and welcome. My name is John August.

**Craig Mazin:** My name is Craig Mazin.

**John:** This is Episode 586 of Scriptnotes, a podcast about screenwriting and things that are interesting to screenwriters.

Today on the show, we welcome back one of our earliest and most frequent guests, Aline Brosh McKenna, who has just made her feature directing debut.

**Craig:** Woo!

**John:** Hey, Aline.

**Aline Brosh McKenna:** Woo woo woo!

**Craig:** Welcome back, Joan Rivers of Scriptnotes.

**Aline:** I’ve been doing a lot of interviews, so I’ve answered to every kind of name. I got Aline [AY-leen], I got Aline [AH-lin-ee], I got Aline [ah-LEE-nay], I got Borsh. I got McKeena. I’m answering to everything these days.

**John:** If people listened to Scriptnotes, they would know that your name’s Aline.

**Craig:** I do like Aline Borsh. That’s pretty great. I might start calling you that.

**John:** It’s good stuff. We’ve now all directed feature films. It’s great.

**Craig:** Jeez.

**John:** We’re going to talk about feature films and feature filmmaking and all that stuff. We have a bunch of TV stuff to talk through and a zillion listener questions, so we’ll get into it. Aline, I would propose that in our Bonus Segment, you and I could interrogate Craig about this third episode of The Last of Us, which we just watched. We’re recording this a week ahead of time. I also want to dig into Craig’s inexcusable decision not to have Bill and Frank do any jigsaw puzzles during their years in isolation.

**Craig:** Not puzzles.

**John:** They could’ve had jigsaw puzzles, and not once, because-

**Aline:** They would! They would!

**John:** They totally would’ve!

**Craig:** No.

**Aline:** Yes.

**Craig:** No.

**Aline:** He would’ve handmade them.

**John:** Because Bill is methodical, and Frank is artistic.

**Craig:** I will explain to both of you why you’re both absolutely dead wrong.

**Aline:** I want to know what games they were playing.

**Craig:** I will tell you.

**Aline:** I feel like [inaudible 00:01:41] it’s like an old Monopoly set or something, or an old Battleship set.

**Craig:** You’ll find out. You’ll find out.

**John:** Content you can only get as a Premium subscriber.

**Craig:** Yes, totally worth the 4.99.

**John:** A hundred percent. Just for that one answer, yeah.

**Craig:** It is 4.99, right?

**John:** Yeah. For a year, it’s a lot cheaper. Just buy the year.

**Craig:** Guys, do the year.

**John:** Aline, Craig, did you see that Showtime and Paramount Plus are finally combining their thing down to one brand?

**Craig:** They’re Showmount Plus now.

**John:** Showmount Plus now.

**Craig:** That’s weird, because there hasn’t been any other kind of strange consolidation going on. There has been. What I’m excited for is in 12 years we’re all going to be working for HBO Plus Mountflixmazon.

**John:** On Mifflin Penguin Random House.

**Aline:** Isn’t it all going to be Silicon Valley? Aren’t we all going to be working for the tech companies? Why doesn’t Google have content?

**John:** They have YouTube, and that’s their-

**Craig:** They tried.

**John:** They tried.

**Craig:** They tried.

**John:** They had YouTube Originals. They had YouTube Red.

**Aline:** I see.

**Craig:** They do. Do they still do YouTube Red?

**John:** No, I don’t think so.

**Craig:** It’s been folded into other things, because the show I remember from YouTube Red was the new Karate Kid, Cobra Kai, but that’s on Netflix now.

**John:** It’s a Netflix show now. Ed Rosson had a show that was a YouTube Original as well and all that stuff.

**Craig:** Google I guess was just like, “We’re too busy making all of the money in the world in advertising. We don’t need to spent more on content.”

**Aline:** It is interesting though. These companies do have different culture from Hollywood. They really are run differently. I think the three of us came up in a time when it was like, insert name of studio chief. Let’s just say it was Bob. It’d be like, “Oh, Bob hurt his back, but he forgot his back pillow, so you don’t want to ask him today.” Or let’s just say the person’s name was Lisa. It would be like, “Lisa, her husband broke his tooth surfing.”

It used to be so personal. You were so in the zone. Especially this was true when you’re waiting to hear on TV stuff. It would be like, “Oh, the president of the network was supposed to read it, but his daughter accidentally cut bangs, and so he can’t possibly be reading it.” There is something about tech companies, where they don’t say things to you that are egregiously personal like that. There really used to be a sense of there were a bunch of delis. You went in and everyone screamed and grabbed a number. Now it definitely seems much more like Madmen.

**John:** It’s all corporatized.

**Aline:** It’s all behind glass. You’re being very polite. You have to show your ID. Craig has this look of a complete scowl on his face.

**Craig:** No, that’s my resting Jew face. I completely agree with you. I was just thinking how you can never say, “Oh, we can’t go pitch Netflix today because the algorithm’s wife’s husband broke his tooth.” The algorithm has no feelings whatsoever.

**John:** Not a bit.

**Craig:** That’s my agreeing with you face, Aline. Imagine what my not agreeing with you face looks like.

**Aline:** Oh, boy. I think Craig and I decided a long time ago. I use your agreeability index frequently. One is the most agreeable, and 10 is the least, right?

**Craig:** Yes.

**Aline:** I’m in a 6/7 zone. I’m in a 6/7 zone. Where are you?

**Craig:** I like to live in the 8. Disagreeability meaning your willingness to disagree with the general consensus around you.

**John:** Fascinating.

**Craig:** I have high disagreeability. I’m not looking to do it, but I have no problem doing it. Other people are like, “If nine people in this room all agree we’re doing this, I’m going to be like, ‘Yeah, I’ll do that too.’”

**Aline:** Where are you?

**John:** I’m probably more conforming in a lot of ways, but there’s definitely things I will stick out and-

**Craig:** You’re a 5.

**John:** I’m a 5.

**Craig:** You’re right in the middle. Most people probably are.

**Aline:** I think you’re a 4/5. Craig and I, if we’ve ever gone to have to order or pick a restaurant or go someplace with a puzzle group or whatever, Craig and I are definitely the least agreeable, for sure.

**John:** I’ll go anywhere, as long as there’s food I can eat. I don’t eat a lot of stuff.

**Craig:** As long as you can eat food.

**John:** As long as you can eat food. Showtime and Paramount Plus has become Paramount Plus with Showtime, which is I think what we’re already subscribed to, because we get Showtime through our Paramount Plus [crosstalk 00:05:57].

**Craig:** I think I’m subscribing to Showtime and Paramount Plus.

**John:** Maybe save some money.

**Craig:** What happens now? Cancel one of them.

**John:** Let’s segue to HBO and HBO Max, because it was announced this week that Westworld is one of the shows that they’ve taken off the service. They’ve now sold them to different FAST services.

**Craig:** Tell people at home what it is in case they don’t know.

**John:** Free ad-supported television, which we used to call AVOD, but FAST is the new name for it.

**Craig:** We used to call it television. When we were kids, it was television.

**John:** It’s streaming television. It’s on demand. It’s not continuously playing.

**Aline:** It’s like Pluto. Pluto is that, right?

**John:** Pluto is one of those. They sold these specifically to I think Roku and Tubi.

**Aline:** Can I ask you a question?

**John:** Please.

**Aline:** Our residual definitions for cable are pretty good, right? Cable broadcasts are pretty good.

**John:** Cable broadcasts are pretty good. Actually, AVOD/FAST is also pretty good.

**Craig:** It’s okay.

**Aline:** That was my question. Obviously, the aftermarket on streaming is bad, but now the streamers are moving to this thing which seems in every way to me to be cable television. Are our definitions good on those Tubi, Roku, Pluto?

**Craig:** They’re not great. They could stand to be improved.

**John:** They could definitely stand to be improved. Here’s my question though. This is not clear in any of the articles that I’ve seen. Is Warners licensing these shows to these services or is it some sort of partnership?

**Craig:** Licensing. It’s gotta be straight up [crosstalk 00:07:25].

**John:** If it’s straight licensing, then it’s actually not a bad thing, because what they would actually be calculated on is the license fee that Tubi or these places are paying. Yes, it can be hinky, just because it could be a package of shows, and you have to split up the package and the fees.

**Craig:** They already do stuff like that.

**John:** That already happens.

**Craig:** It’ll be complicated, and none of us will understand it. That’s the most important thing for everyone to know.

**John:** We’ll never understand it, ever. Aline, you get to a good point, that it’s a little bit more like what we used to have with residuals when they’d show up on other services. That was at least an income stream. The concern with the stuff that was made directly for streamers is there was no income stream for residuals after three years.

**Aline:** The definition which is rent at home I know is a great one.

**John:** I love that.

**Craig:** That’s the best one.

**Aline:** That’s the best one. It would be great to have something. That’s an on-demand… Anyway, somebody will sort it out, and we will be sorting it out shortly.

**John:** While we’re talking about things being a little bit more like they used to be, have you noticed that some of these streaming orders have gotten larger and larger? Daredevil’s getting an 18-episode season order. Andor was two 12-episode seasons. That feels more like TV.

**Craig:** Yeah. They definitely don’t do it like that at HBO. I know that much. There has been this thing. I have to say I would be surprised if it catches on. It just seems like from a business point of view, it seems a little crazy to just… For instance, Lord of the Rings, they renewed them before it even came out. I don’t know. Wait until one episode airs. That’s what HBO does. They’re like, “Just in case.” It makes sense. Even if you internally renew it.

**John:** You want that press bump.

**Craig:** However that works. I would be surprised if that trend continues, because these shows are expensive to do.

**John:** They are.

**Craig:** All of them.

**Aline:** Also, where do you add your value? Where are they getting the value? If they’re getting value from ads, then they’re going to want to do more episodes. Where are they making their money? The 25-episode season, when you’re doing traditional advertising, that’s a big windfall for them.

**John:** One argument maybe is they’re making more money by reducing churn. If they have 18 episodes of a Daredevil season, and they’re releasing those once per week, you’re going to have to keep your Disney Plus membership up for at least half the year, and that helps.

**Craig:** It’s this weird calculation they have to do, where they go, “Okay, we are going to keep people or make money off of ancillary markets or ad-supported on another tier, the more episodes we have. However, the more episodes we ask our creators to make, theoretically, not always, but theoretically, the quality begins to decrease, because it’s just —

**John:** They can’t make the same kind of show.

**Craig:** No. The more time and energy you put into something, theoretically the better it gets. You have this 8-to-12-episode season model for your prestige. Let’s all show up and buy a subscription because it’s part of the culture. Then you have these other kinds of shows that could be making a terrific amount of money for them, some of which can be excellent. There’s still great stuff on network television. It’s an interesting calculation, and thank god I don’t have to be the one making it, because that would be bad.

**Aline:** Talent is also driving it, because from their point of view, the value they get from having done eight episodes and then being able to do two movies in the year two, in a lot of ways that’s where… They all want to be flexible now. They all want a slightly limited order.

Man, I really have such respect for the days of sitcoms kicking out 120, 150 episodes. We did 62 on Crazy Ex, which is actually, I discovered this week during my Girls rewatch, is the exact same number of episodes as Girls. It was a lot. It felt like a lot. It’s so nothing compared to Raymond, Friends, Office, hundreds of episodes.

Writers are very nimble. They really are. I think writers have done a very good job of… We’re all pivoting as fast as we can to whatever the new model is. I think there are so many opportunities now to go places. I think there’s an upside to finding a spot that can really support your piece and really understands your piece. There was a thing in broadcast where you felt like things were getting less special handling.

I think now there’s more attention being paid to everybody coming together to craft this. You could feel it. You can feel that when they’re making these investments, that yeah, if you’re making 8 or 10, you have a different level of scrutiny from if you have to make 25 of them. I’m assuming that people give you notes at some point or like, “Yeah, this looks good.”

**John:** Also, you literally could not create some of the shows that we’re talking about. You would have an impossible time trying to make 20 episodes of The Last of Us. You would still be shooting The Last of Us. It would be a different show.

**Craig:** Also, it’s just too expensive. That’s the other thing is there are certain shows that people expect to be somewhat cinematic in nature. They go to different places. They’re a spectacle. For a typical network show, like say the kind that our friend Derek does, there’s a fire station. That is a central set you could live on. You can roll 50% of an episode inside this confine. That’s incredibly helpful. Sitcoms, that’s all they were, by and large. It’s way easier to go through those episodes and shoot them. When you’re out there running around like you’re making the way we would make movies, there’s just no way to do 20. That would kill you.

**Aline:** We did bonkers stuff on Crazy Ex. We had episodes with 70 strips. So did Jane the Virgin, so many strips. I remember talking to Jenny about how she shot things in the hallway in her office. We shot things in Michael Hitchcock’s office, in our office. Our finale, there was a scene that took place in Guatemala. Guatemala was our PA’s parking spot. On our schedule, it said “Guatemala, dot dot dot, PA’s parking spot” on our strips. We just did so, so, so many. It was kind of a fun thing to feel like how crafty can you be.

**John:** Definitely.

**Aline:** How can you repurpose things. It was funny. Making it an inexpensive show, relatively inexpensive show, was actually great preparation for making a bigger movie, because I’m so used to cutting for budget, and I’m so used to making a tiara out of tinfoil, that when we were scouting for the movie, people would have to say to me, “Wait a second. Don’t pick anything yet,” because I was so apt to be like, “Oh, this is going to work. This is going to work.” It’s like, “Aline, this is supposed to be the seashore, and this is a conference room.” I was like, “No no no, we can do it. We can do it.”

It was like I had come up doing Summer Stock and then I got to Broadway. That really was Crazy Ex. We worked at the outer edges of our financial capacity just all the time and repurposed things and repurposed sets and two-walls and one-walls.

I’ve done a segue for you, if you’d like to use this as your segue. It was good preparation for doing something where I went from shooting seven pages a day to shooting two pages a day.

**John:** Let’s take that segue, and we’ll jump back to our follow-up in just a second. You came on the show before, talking about this movie. One of the things you did say before was that you had to unlearn some of the habits you had learned in terms of the thinking always about schedule, thinking always about budget, recognizing that there were people whose job it was to do the job you were doing as a showrunner, to make sure that the trains ran on time, and that your job as a director was just to get what you wanted. You really had to focus on the artistic side of it, and not so focused on all the business side of it all. Now that the movie’s done, and it’s going to be out on Netflix for people to see, tell us what day it drops on Netflix.

**Aline:** It drops on February 10th, Friday.

**John:** February 10th.

**Craig:** Why are we all rap artists now? Everything drops.

**John:** Everything has to drop. Everything has to drop.

**Craig:** We used to just put movies out.

**John:** When does it come out?

**Aline:** Craig, I’m dropping it. I’m hoping it blows up.

**Craig:** Exactly. We drop things. I don’t drop anything. I’m not cool enough to drop stuff.

**John:** When do your episodes of your show come out, what time of day?

**Craig:** They come out at 9 p.m. Eastern Time on Sunday evenings.

**John:** Aline, do you know what time of day Your Place or Mine comes out?

**Aline:** I don’t, and I need to find out. You know what? Someone asked me yesterday, and I don’t know. Man, what I love about HBO is it’s so on mama’s schedule, because I’m eating dinner at 6.

**John:** Exactly.

**Aline:** I’m watching my show. Mama’s taking her bath and going to bed. I always love that the HBO stuff is on at 6. It’s a delight. 9 o’clock is too late.

**Craig:** We get that benefit out here on the West Coast. We get to see stuff at 6 p.m. I’m actually now really fascinated by this Netflix thing, because it’s true, they always talk about what day something is going to be. Is it 12:01 a.m.?

**Aline:** I’m going to find out. Should I find out while we’re talking? Let me see if I can find out.

**John:** If you can figure out while we’re talking, we’ll do it and we’ll have an update live in the course of the show.

**Aline:** That’d be a live time… I’m going to ask right now. When things post to Netflix-

**Craig:** You don’t have to do it out loud.

**Aline:** … at what time? Do you know why I do that? Because in the writers’ room when I have to send an email or a text in the writers’ room, I feel like it’s so rude for them just to watch me type, so I often read it out.

**Craig:** You think yelling it at them while you do it is going to…

**Aline:** It’s always the answer. Always the answer.

**John:** Weirdly though, Aline has developed the ability that she could say one thing, type a completely different thing. While she’s basically firing this writer who’s in the room right now, she’s saying the other thing. It’s really an impressive skillset she’s developed over the course of seasons.

**Craig:** I need to learn that.

**Aline:** You can’t see that, but I’m making an eggplant parm right now.

**Craig:** Oh god, I wish that were true. By the way, I’ve made eggplant parm. You know what? It’s a huge pain in the ass.

**John:** It is, because you have to-

**Aline:** The draining and the salting [crosstalk 00:17:54].

**Craig:** The draining and the salting and the dehydrating, but it’s essential. Then when it’s good, it’s good.

**John:** It is good.

**Craig:** It is so annoying.

**Aline:** It is.

**John:** I’ll still take a chicken parm over an eggplant parm any day of the week.

**Aline:** I can’t believe I’ve never told this story on the podcast before, but one day on Crazy Ex, we were sitting around talking about our favorite foods. People were like pizza, doughnuts, ice cream, pasta, whatever. It got to me and I said, “At the end of the day, what I really love is a well-cooked vegetable.” Rachel looked at me and goes, “Don’t say that to people. Don’t do that.”

**Craig:** She’s right.

**Aline:** She goes, “Everyone’s going to hate you. Don’t say that. That’s not a good answer.” She’s like, “Just say butter pecan ice cream.” You know what the truth is? I love a well-cooked vegetable.

**Craig:** Aline, don’t say that to people.

**John:** Let me try to wrestle this conversation back to the making of your film. One of the things I’m curious about is… Up to this point, we’ve talked a little bit about production over previous episodes. You were shooting in LA for New York and other things like that. When it came time to actually promote a movie, you’ve promoted a ton of movies, big movies, and you know what that looks like. How does it look to promote a film that’s going to be debuting on Netflix? Does it feel the same scale? What’s the same and what’s different to you?

**Aline:** I’m in the zone of I can’t compare it to having a big movie come out as a director, because I’ve only been a screenwriter on those. Any whisper of information that I could glean as the screenwriter, I was so… All the information I could get was basically from the director or the producers if I had a good relationship with them, or sometimes the studio person would loop me in. Now I’m so super looped in that sometimes I have this moment of being like, “Oh, you want to know what I think of this spot or this clip or this?” It took me a while to get used to it.

Also, I can’t compare it to other marketing PR departments, but the people at Netflix are incredibly nice. Very, very nice, very on top of it, very helpful, very good communicators, so I have felt looped in at every step. I haven’t had that feeling of disorientation that I always had with movies as a screenwriter where I was always trying to… Like a mutated mushroom, I was always trying to get into people’s brain-

**Craig:** That’s weird.

**Aline:** … and figure out what was going on. Now I know what’s going on, so that’s been really nice.

**John:** One of the things that’s going to be different though about this film is that usually by Friday evening you would know did the film work or did the film not work, did the film do great or did the film tank.

**Craig:** Box office.

**John:** You’d get a read on the box. You’d hear the East Coast box office numbers. You won’t have that. You’ll have the reviews, which will be great. You’ll have Twitter reactions and social media stuff. You won’t really have a sense of how big the cultural-

**Craig:** You get numbers the next day. Netflix numbers are bananas. I don’t know what they’re based on. Honestly, I legitimately don’t. I don’t know how I would even interpret them. For other outlets, there’s a little bit more of a firm, “Okay, Nielsen says this many people watched it. Linearly, this many people watched it on the platform.” Then as the day goes on, or the week goes on rather, they keep telling you as people are watching. As a movie goes, it’s one episode that they will just continually accrue numbers for and keep filling you in on. It’s Netflix, so I fully presume that they’re going to let us know that 14 billion people watched it. That’s what they do.

**Aline:** I think they mostly give you good news. I think where it’s not performing, I don’t think they give it to you. I think I’ll know mostly if it’s working well. Those days of waiting for your movie to come out and looking at the tracking and calling your other friends and saying, “What does this mean?” and looking at the other. It was so stressful calling. The only way that I remember you would get box office is from calling the New Line box office number. That went up at 11:30.

**Craig:** We would call William Morris. They also had a little recording where you would call in on Saturday morning, and an intern was explaining your fate to you. You’re waiting for your movie. It’s like, “In fifth place. In sixth place. In seventh place.” You’re like, “Oh, no.”

**John:** Oh, no, not even there.

**Craig:** “In ninth place, your piece of crap.”

**Aline:** We’ve all had that feeling. We’ve all had that feeling. Somewhere in my saved emails folder, I have an email that Craig sent to me when one of the movies I wrote that bombed bombed. Craig wrote me this beautiful email. I just remember it was like, “Because you are Aline, you’ve written 15 screenplays in the time it’s taken for… ” It was a very comforting pep talk email because it was very public. It felt like you were just waiting to be defenestrated and it was terrifying, those bad box office numbers.

**John:** No matter what, you won’t have those, but you won’t also have the good box office numbers. That’s a point, a thing I would get to is, we’ve had friends who’ve released movies on Netflix. Rawson Thurber has movies on Netflix. They’ll have the big headlines about “the biggest thing ever,” da da da, but it doesn’t carry the same weight as $200 million.

**Craig:** Because they say that every movie does that.

**John:** That’s the problem.

**Craig:** Netflix is a little bit the boy who cried wolf.

**Aline:** We didn’t grow up with these barometers. I remember running into Rawson and he was like, “Red Notice has been seen by everyone who’s eaten waffles within the last year with their right hand, everyone on the planet Earth.” He had metrics that were so intense. I don’t know. It’s going to be a new experience.

Listen, I think the barometer for myself of what success is is a little different. I think we’re all different about that and what reactions bother us, what don’t. It used to bother me if I had a close friend and they didn’t see the thing I wrote. Now I don’t care at all. It used to bother me in the beginning, because it seemed so momentous to have anything come out that I…

I’ve gotten much more, I think, defining the success by the process. You’ve gotta somewhat let the rest of it go, because obviously, we can’t control it, and because it’s like, yeah, we knew what $200 million meant, we knew what $100 million meant, and now these things are…

We have a saying in our house. When we’re trying to figure out if someone’s famous enough for something, Will will say, “Maryann McKenna doesn’t know who that is,” his mom. I think it’s the same thing with success. If I call Maryann McKenna and try to explain to her how many minutes were streamed, they’re not those clear touchdown arms you’re looking for. You never want to do that anyway.

I think like what just happened with Craig’s, the third episode of The Last of Us, which you could feel… I like to think I was quite early to the twits with that.

**Craig:** Twits.

**Aline:** As I’ve been looking around, that episode got a huge reaction. I don’t know what its numbers will be or how they will compare. You can feel that it made an impact on people. I think in a world where we’re not leaving our house as much, we’re not going to the movie theaters, we’re not getting that box office, you have to define success differently.

Crazy Ex-Girlfriend was very poorly rated, but people thought about it and wrote about it. I was particularly honored by the number of people that wrote intelligent things about it the day after it aired. That was really, really an honor to go to those recap places and see how much care and effort people had put into it and how well they knew the show. That’s nice, because before the internet, you’d have a movie come out, and if it didn’t do well, it felt like it disappeared.

John Gatins, our friend, has a great expression. When you finish a movie, he always says, “You just wrote someone’s favorite movie,” because among the three of us, we’ve written some stinkers, for sure, but I’m sure we all have-

**Craig:** What?!

**Aline:** … someone who comes up to me and goes, “Hey, that stinker that you made was my favorite movie, and we watch it all the time,” or, “I’ve seen a hundred times.” I think there’s a lot of ways to define success that are different from the cold, hard metrics. That being said, I love the cold, hard metrics. Love them.

**John:** Let’s give one thing to our Scriptnotes listeners. Folks who have listened to this podcast from the beginning and know who you are, what’s one thing when they watch the film they can look for, like, “Ah, that’s the thing Aline told me about that I’m looking for, because she told me on this podcast.”

**Craig:** Add value to our podcast is what we’re saying.

**Aline:** I’m going to preview something for you. I’m trying to think if I have a Craig or a John reference in this. I don’t, because I definitely referenced Mazin in Crazy Ex. There is a line that Tig Notaro says, that she improvised in one of the scenes. We all laughed really hard. I was like, “That’s never going to be in the movie. It’s just too dirty. It’s never going to be in the movie.” Not only is it in the movie, it’s in the trailer. It’s a moment where she says, “I hope you have a good time going to New York. You might meet someone, so you better get waxed.” Reese goes, “Waxed?” Then Tig goes, “Waxed,” and points to her butt. Then Reese says, “Oh, that’s not going to happen.” That was a really funny improv, but I was like, “That’s never going to be in our PG-13 movie,” and it’s there.

**Craig:** It is.

**Aline:** You can thank Miss Tig for it, because that was an improv.

**Craig:** She’s amazing.

**John:** We love it. We have a little bit of follow-up to get to before, so let’s truck through that. Megana, help us out on the cereal mascot movie, because it’s something that Craig and I talked about. Why is there not a Franken Berry, Count Chocula-

**Craig:** Is there one?

**John:** Kind of there is.

**Craig:** Megana.

**John:** Megana, help us out.

**Megana:** Dustin from Atlanta wrote in and said, “The corporate food mascot film Craig pitched in Episode 585 kind of already exists as a horrific bargain bin DVD called Foodfight! The battle between the world’s most beloved brands and the forces of darkness features computer animation so hauntingly cheap that it shocks the conscience to see the celebrities and products who willingly attached their names to the project.”

**John:** Here’s who’s in this.

**Craig:** I just love “shocks the conscience.”

**John:** We have Mrs. Butterworth, Mr. Clean, Chef Boyardee, Charlie the Tuna, Chester Cheetah, the California Raisins, but also Christopher Lloyd, Hilary Duff, Eva Longoria, Charlie Sheen, Ed Asner.

**Aline:** What? What?

**Craig:** It’s all animated though.

**John:** All animated, yeah.

**Craig:** If you can sit there in your underwear and pick up a check for a hundred grand for a day’s work-

**John:** I can’t fault them.

**Craig:** I would. I would be Mr. Clean, no problem.

**Aline:** Wow. You stop at Mad Men before that.

**Craig:** You know what? That doesn’t shock my conscience. I guess he’s saying that the quality of the animation itself. Have you heard about this Christmas animated movie? I gotta find this article that I read. It was an animated movie. It is not just poor animation. It is impossibly poor animation. It actually did air on television.

**John:** Love it.

**Craig:** Once. There’s this whole cult that’s grown up around it. Basically, the people that did it, it was a very poor script, and then they used something like Microsoft slideshows, some off-the-shelf thing for children. I gotta dig this up. That one does in fact shock the conscience.

**John:** Further follow-up about state-sponsored script consultants. We had a person who wrote in to say like, hey, here in the Netherlands or in Europe, they have script consultants who are paid.

**Craig:** By the state.

**John:** By the state, who are editors. Holden wrote in. Megana, what did he say?

**Megana:** Holden said, “In discussing Lorenz from Vienna’s question on Episode 585, it appears all three of you missed a key point that should’ve been made. If a government is funding script consultants, it would be an easy way to control the narrative for various media projects, thus enabling the state to make sure it’s seen in a positive light.”

**Craig:** If we’re talking about generally non-democratic states, theocracies, or whatever you would call Russia, kleptocracy, mobocracy, then absolutely. If you’re talking about Austria or Denmark or France, no. I think the consultants aren’t there to impress upon screenwriters the necessity to valorize France, for instance.

**John:** There’s definitely state funding of films, and sometimes through taxes and other things to do that. Sometimes that’s how you keep a local film market going, make it possible. There’s always going to be a question of political influence there. Yes, it’s good to be mindful of it, but I don’t think it’s the number one thing to be thinking about.

**Craig:** No, I don’t either.

**John:** We have a bunch of listener questions, but more important than any of those…

Craig and **John:** Megana Has a Question.

**Aline:** Megana has a question. Megana has a question.

**Megana:** Oh my god, I love that. Is that what harmony is? I always pretend I know what it is, but I truly have no idea.

**Craig:** Of course you do, Megana. Harmony is simply the blending of voices to create chords, like on a piano.

John and Craig and **Aline:** (singing)

**Megana:** It’s just that there’s multiple, okay. My question is, a few weeks ago we re-aired this 2013 segment where all three of you were talking about the process of finding your voice. Given that Aline has just directed her first feature, I’m curious what’s been your process for figuring out your professional ambitions? Are you guys doing the things you imagined you’d be doing 10 years ago, 20 years ago? How has that changed, and why?

**Craig:** Megana does have a question.

**Aline:** That’s a great question.

**Craig:** That’s heavy.

**John:** That’s a good question. Craig, I want to start with you, because go back 10 years to the start of the podcast, you did not seem to have an ambition of doing television. Television was not interesting to you. That’s been a professional change. What other ambitions have changed?

**Craig:** I don’t know if I’ve ever had really specific ambitions. I’ve always wanted to make stuff that people saw. I’ve been making stuff that people have seen for a long time, but I think probably what changed maybe about 10 years ago, ish, was a desire to make things that I would want to see, more than just things that other people would want to see. That’s definitely had a pretty fundamental impact on how I do things.

**John:** I would say I’ve always had the ambition of doing one of everything. If I see somebody else doing a thing, like, “I want to do that. People are having a podcast? I want to have a podcast.” I’ve always wanted to do those things. I think one of the things I recognize about that ambition is that sometimes you don’t get to the second one of those things for quite a long time.

I directed a movie, and it was a really good experience. I had opportunities to direct movies, and instead, I did a Broadway show, and now as I need to go back to actually direct another movie, it’s just been a long time. It took longer than it probably should’ve to get back to there. I don’t know that my professional ambitions have changed that much. I’ve always wanted to play in all the sandboxes, and that’s what I’ve been going for.

**Craig:** What about you, Aline?

**Aline:** I think for me it’s actually more of a personal ambition than a professional ambition, if that makes any sense. In connection to that voice episode, I came into the business feeling like I have a way of expressing myself that seems to make people laugh or be interesting. That’s really what I have.

Then just fighting to be heard and express myself in the way I wanted to, you have to sell things. You have to attach a director. You have to listen to the director. You are a screenwriter, so you are not the prime mover. As you guys know, I’m an opinionated gal, and I like things a certain way. I’m glad I learned these skills.

There was a way of being political that was very important as a screenwriter and as a woman, frankly, to learn how to speak other languages that could get you where you needed to go. One thing that has changed really since I became a showrunner was I felt like I could express myself as an artist comedically or as a writer, but also just be more me.

I’ve inherited from my mom a bit of a sense of I’m a magpie. I just pick up shiny objects and like to wear them. I have very few neutral items in my closet. I have a lot of colorful patterns and things that are fun.

**Craig:** Same.

**Aline:** Just like Craig, which is something that I’ve always always… Our big point of connection. On set, I started wearing the things that I enjoy, that make me happy. Actually, on the movie, it got to be a fun thing. We would talk about our clothes and what we were wearing or play music.

I think as a screenwriter, there’s a certain seemliness. There’s a certain lieutenant-ness that you built into your personality. You’re very diplomatic, especially if you’ve ever done a production rewrite. You’re the diplomat. You’re the person who’s bridging gaps. Not that I don’t still do that, but I feel that I’m able to do the things I want to do in a way that is the most me and not feel as inhibited. It also goes back to having immigrant parents and hairy arms and the things about growing up. I feel like I’m able to express myself better now.

There is a line in Your Place or Mine where Reese says, “As my drunk mother once said,” and there is no reference to her having a drunk mother anywhere in the movie. There’s no reference to her mother having alcoholism. It’s not part of her backstory. I just flew in the line, “As my drunk mother once said,” because it made me laugh, because it feels very true to life. It is something that you would learn about something through a blurt.

I think as a screenwriter, I would’ve pitched that to a director, and they would’ve been like, “That’s not in there. There’s no precedent for that. It doesn’t, strictly speaking, make sense.” It doesn’t. It makes me laugh. It made Reese laugh. It’s in the movie.

That ability to just say to people, “Hey, trust me, this resonates with me. I think it might resonate with other people because it resonates with me and I think this is funny and I think this is interesting,” and learning to really be that person, whether it’s being a showrunner or a director or frankly just a screenwriter when I still do that has been a journey for me to be my full self at work.

**Megana:** Thank you.

**John:** Let’s let Craig be his full self as you tackle this next question, because this one is so tailor made for Craig to answer.

**Megana:** Carl asks, “I’m a mid-level TV writer at the cusp of becoming upper level. I’ve made the decision to part ways with my agents. I’ve been with them for seven years. Although I like them, I think we’ve mutually lost that loving feeling. Correspondence is minimal. Phone conversations are quick and impersonal, even when they’re congratulating me on a new staffing gig. Anyhow, I’m fortunate to have been consistently working throughout my TV writing career. Now that I’m finding jobs on my own, I think it’s time to move on. I’m currently on a show, so I feel like the time to strike is now. My questions are, what’s the healthiest way to let go of my agents and do I fire my agents first, then find another one, or is it the other way around?”

**Aline:** These are my favorite Craig questions. My favorite.

**Craig:** I do enjoy these.

**Aline:** In fact, somebody was once having an issue with their agent, and I almost got you on speakerphone with them, because Craig’s agent advice is my favorite. Hit it.

**Craig:** Always fire your agent. You definitely are in the perfect zone for agent firing. You want to fire them. They have lost the loving feeling. You’re working. That means that it shouldn’t be a massive problem to find another representative, especially if you’re working steadily. I assume that you have another representative in your life, whether it is a manager or more likely an attorney. Pretty much all of us have an attorney. You want to talk to that attorney first.

My experience, full disclosure, I haven’t fired an agent in 15 years. I don’t always practice. I like my agents. What can I say?

I think the honorable way of going about things is you fire them first, and then your attorney lets the other places know, “So-and-so is available.” Then you look around and see who wants to meet. You have those discussions, and then you pick somebody. You may say, “What if nobody wants to be my agent?” I don’t really think that’s going to be a problem. It doesn’t sound like that would be a problem.

More to the point, they all talk. You may not even get a word out. You pick up the phone to call. Let’s say you’re at CAA. You pick up the phone to call somebody at Gersh. Before anyone answers the phone at Gersh, CAA will know. I don’t know how they… They’re fungus. They have threads underground, and they just know. My recommendation would be to talk to your lawyer, and then yes, you would want to normally let the first agent go and then start looking for a second.

**John:** Aline, same advice for you?

**Aline:** Yeah, that sounds all right to me. I’ll tell you where my brain went. I wanted to thank Craig publicly for making monsters that don’t look like vaginas, because every movie-

**Craig:** You weren’t listening.

**Aline:** When they finally unveil the monster, it looks like a big, slimy vagina. The monsters that you created in your show are so interesting looking to me. When you had that closeup of the guy from the side, I haven’t seen that exact shape of monster. I enjoy that. It always felt like in these movies, TV shows, you get to the monster, and it’s just a big, slimy mucus membrane with a big aperture. Thank you. That has nothing to do with the question.

**Craig:** You’re welcome. No, it doesn’t.

**John:** Actually, here’s how I think we tie this back in. I think you call up your current agents and start talking about how much you enjoy the monster design. As you get into these little bits, “Really, the reason I was calling is I don’t think this is actually the right setup. I don’t think this is actually working write. I’m going to be starting to look for other representation.”

**Craig:** You’re fired, but how about those clickers? Thank you, Aline. I have to give credit where credit is due. All of the amazing people at Naughty Dog, the company that made the video game, they are really responsible for… We have adapted it so that it can be done and be convincing in live action, but all inspiration was taken from them and their total, and I mean total, lack of vagina monsters. You will not see a single vagina monster.

**Aline:** You know what I’m talking about. You know exactly what I’m talking about.

**Craig:** Oh yeah. There’s this thing that happens somewhere along the line. I don’t know where it started, but in my mind I want to say Predator all the way back in the ’80s-

**John:** That feels right.

**Craig:** … where alien or monster mouths have split mandibles, so when they open, the whole mouth becomes basically this large, slimy orifice. It just keeps sounding like Stranger Things. The monster in Stranger Things, it does the same thing. The mouth opens and becomes four pieces.

**John:** Petals out, yeah.

**Craig:** Everybody loves the four-piece mouth. Our people are not monsters. Our people are sick.

**Aline:** They put something tonsilly at the top, which looks rather clitoral to me. I’m sorry, I’ve derailed the show.

**Craig:** Or you’ve finally put us on track, that after all this time, we finally have found what we’re… Listen. As everybody knows, I am an expert in female reproductive health. I’m, again, not licensed. I have not gone to medical school, and nonetheless.

**John:** I think we need to find a question that can really apply your female reproductive health to our listenership. Megana, do you have a question cued up that relates to female reproductive health?

**Megana:** Nat in LA asks, “My writing partner and I are repped by our first agent together and are approaching our first staffing season. I’m also pregnant with my first child. At what point do I communicate my pregnancy with our agent? We love our agent, trust them, but I worry that my pregnancy could come in between me and my writing partner’s career, either preventing us from getting work or making our first job complicated with a summer due date. I’d like to think my pregnancy won’t prevent us from getting a spot in a writers’ room. If worse comes to worst, my writing partner could represent us when I need to give birth, rest, etc, but I also know that pregnant women scare even the best of employers.”

**Craig:** That is a question about female reproductive health. If you trust your agent, I think it’s essential for you to tell your agent, because your agent is only, what, maximum three months away from finding out? They’re going to see you. Eventually, you will start showing. It will become clear. This isn’t something where you will want them to be shocked. I think part of an agent’s job is to handle that for you and advise you.

You’re absolutely right that people have been, I’m going to call it problematic, fully problematic about pregnant women in the workplace. It is against the law for them to discriminate against you for being pregnant. It is your right to be pregnant and not to have recriminations or exclusions. Your agent and your attorney will be the best advocates for you, so I would bring them in on this one as soon as possible. That’s my instinct.

**John:** I’m going to do a counterpoint, and we’ll let Aline be the deciding vote.

**Craig:** Great.

**John:** I don’t think you say anything. I don’t think you say anything until you are at a point in your pregnancy where it’s just going to be so obvious that you actually have to communicate it-

**Craig:** Interesting.

**John:** … because you do not know what opportunities you’re going to be missing, because it’s out there or because the agent feels like, “Oh, maybe I shouldn’t put that writing team on that list, because I know this is a thing that’s coming up,” or this thing could be shooting overseas or whatever. I don’t think you say anything. I think you’re only asking for trouble revealing something that doesn’t need to be revealed.

**Craig:** Tiebreaker.

**John:** Tiebreaker. Aline, help us out here.

**Aline:** I’m tending more towards John just in terms of it’s not really anybody’s business. There definitely can be repercussions. Whether they’re conscious or unconscious biases, there are going to be people who are going to be thinking, “Are they going to want to sit here? Are they going to then nurse?”

This is one of the hardest things for women to negotiate, because at the point where you’re in your reproductive years, you’re probably also in the building of your career years. If you’re very well established, things work around you. In your early 30s, you’re probably still…

I don’t think there’s anything wrong with telling your agent when you’re six or seven months, and it’s going to be very obvious to anyone that you go in to meet. You don’t want the agent to have heard about it from the person that you’ve met with for the first time.

I think at the point where you’re actually being sent up for jobs, you can say, “Hey, you know what? I’m due in May.” Then I think partly if you want to make it a non-issue, you have to act like it’s a non-issue. I really wish there was some guarantee that people are not going to be heinous about it.

The only thing I will say is that one upside to letting people know, letting bosses know, is that their reaction will be telling about what kind of experience you’ll have on that show. On our show, a lot of people got pregnant. We had people nursing in the room and pumping in the room. We had a little room that they could go into to pump or rock the baby. I know Jenji’s room was like that. It’s not industry-wide. If you are being hired by someone who seems like they’re going to be a big asshole about it and won’t hire you, you’re probably saving yourself from a crappy room.

**Craig:** Just to be clear, this question is about whether you tell your agent, not about whether you tell an employer.

**John:** I think you have to assume that if you tell your agent, it could get out there. What happens if that person does know? Did the agent tell them? Then you’re maybe losing a little trust in your agent.

**Craig:** I hear what you’re saying. Nobody wants to be the first person that gets mowed down on this thing or the 9,000th person that gets mowed down. We do need to change the culture somehow.

**John:** Absolutely.

**Aline:** Listen. You go to your agent. You say, “Yeah, I’d like to staff.” Then they come back and go, “Craig, August wants to staff you.” You go, “Oh, great. By the way, I’m pregnant. I’m due in May. Anyway, when’s my meeting?”

**Craig:** That’s my point is that that seems like you’ve disrupted your relationship with your agent, because now you’ve put your agent in a weird spot.

**Aline:** Your agent doesn’t need to know when they’re putting you up for jobs whether you’re pregnant or not. You can just tell them before you get an interview.

**Craig:** It sounds like the person asking the question is concerned about it. That’s what I’m coming from. She seems very concerned about it. Somebody needs to counsel her on this, other than us on a podcast. We don’t know her. We don’t know what level she is in her job. We don’t know how frequently they work. She’s saying she loves her agent. We don’t know who that agent is or anything like that. Ultimately, I guess what it comes down to is no matter what advice we can give, she’s going to have to follow her instincts on this.

**John:** I think instincts are important.

**Aline:** I would say when it feels pertinent. If you’re sitting in your house not working, your agent doesn’t need to know what’s going on in your uterus. If you are actually up for something, if you get a big movie job, and they’re going to want you to go somewhere, you go, “Great. Singapore, that’ll work. I’m going to give birth, and then I just need two months.” I just think it’s better to talk about it when it’s in the context of something that actually needs to be administered.

I have always had very close relationships to my agents, and most of them have been women. I would’ve erred on the side of like, “Hey, I’m pregnant. Let’s put our heads together and figure this out.”

There is no one right way to do it, especially because, as Craig said, culturally we’re still very bad. This is one of the things on which we are the worst. This bias is so deep. It’s not just our business. It’s really, really tough for women to be looking for jobs when they are pregnant or have newborns. People just have these preconceptions.

I just will say from my perspective, having worked with so many pregnant and nursing mothers, they were very devoted to their work, great workers, figured it out, made it work. Men too. There’s a lot of really devoted parents who want to go and hang out with their kid. We need to change the language around that too, because if a man’s having a baby, he’s not paying that same price, but then we also don’t give them the same opportunity to go and be parents.

**Craig:** We get nothing.

**John:** We get parental leave.

**Craig:** Yeah, now we do.

**John:** That was only in the last contract we got parental leave.

**Craig:** Yeah, the last contract. When my kids were born, there was no like, oh, you get to… Nobody cared.

**John:** Aline, as a person who’s staffed shows before, the fact that Nat would be coming in here with a writing partner, does that change your thinking about it at all? Does that maybe feel like, oh, at least I’ll have one of those people in the room? That’s my first question for you.

Second question is, now so much more is being done on Zoom, and so even if she were home, she could still be participating, or if she’s on bedrest she could still be participating. Do you think that makes it easier for her to be landing this job?

**Aline:** Yeah, the partner thing does make it easier, because people will perceive that you won’t go to zero. Working from home is still a thing. God, it’s really hard to work from home when the baby’s there. I got an office when my son was 18 months old, because it was just so hard to do it with him. It was actually easier for all of us if I wasn’t there physically. These are really personal choices.

We just are not a country that’s very good at laying out the most family-forward way to do this. You’re relying on individual bosses. It’s one of the things about Hollywood that’s still a little weird. We’re all in these individual fiefdoms with individual bosses. Again, when you meet with folks, try and make sure… If this is somebody who’s really anti-family in general, those can be really nightmare jobs.

**John:** Lastly, I’ll point listeners to, if you have more questions about pregnancy and working, Liz Hannah’s episode where she comes on and she talks about… She got pregnant while she was making her show and basically kept it from everybody and wore baggy clothes all the way through production, because she knew it was going to be a real problem. Basically, she did not want to be the showrunner, director who everybody was so obsessed about your pregnancy. Those are factors too.

**Craig:** No question. If your instinct is to do that, you should do it. Like Aline says, it’s your uterus, it’s your body and situation. If you trust somebody in your inner circle to bring them in and basically say, okay, just like my partner and I, if she has a partner at home, we know that I’m pregnant. You can bring a trusted partner in and say, “Now you know I’m pregnant, and let’s make that part of our internal planning before we go and do anything.”

**Aline:** “Can you find me someone that we know is not an asshole about these things, has regular hours, might be accommodating, has kids themselves?”

**Craig:** Exactly.

**Aline:** I’m sure you guys have talked about it on the show. The showrunners with bad personal lives are brutal to work for. Brutal.

**John:** It’s come time for our One Cool Things. My One Cool Thing is a game I just played this last weekend called Salem 1692. It is a good game that Craig will enjoy because it’s like Werewolf or Mafia. There’s a social deception or a social deduction game.

**Craig:** I do like that.

**John:** You are, as you might guess, either a witch or not a witch in Salem, Massachusetts. You’re trying to figure out who the other witches are. We played with seven people, which felt like the right number of people. It’s a card game. You have these alibis in front of you. You make accusations against people. It moves pretty quickly, which is a nice thing.

There’s an app on your phone that can do the moderator, do the Craig role in terms of telling people what to do. Ultimately, we found that once a person was dead, they should take over, and a human person should do it, but it’s a good way to get started. The box it comes in is gorgeous. It’s a fun, good game for any group of people that you’d want to play a board game with.

**Aline:** Invite me over, August. Come on.

**John:** Next game, you’re over here.

**Craig:** What about you, Aline?

**Aline:** I have a very short one, but I’ll add if you like that sort of thing, Mafia, The Traitor on Peacock, delightful.

**John:** I’m so excited to see The Traitor. Alan Cumming’s hosting it.

**Aline:** Oh my god. If you like that sort of game, you’ll like it.

**Craig:** I saw images of this thing.

**Aline:** I watched it. I got real bingey on it. I watched it in two days.

**Craig:** The thing about reality programs that I often get caught up on, weirdly, and that knocks me away from them, is the music. It’s like there’s one computer making the overly dramatic music for all of them. I just keep waiting for one of them to be like, “We’re going to go with jazz. Let’s just see what happens.”

**Aline:** This one is loosely set on Alan Cumming’s Scottish Highland castle. They do a lot of music which is riffs on that. It’s fun. It knows it’s silly. He knows it’s silly. He’s wearing fantastic outfits. It’s really pretty delightfully done. My thing is, as we all are trying to drink more water, and obviously, all of us growing up, we never drank a single glass of water, pretty much ever.

**John:** Never drank water.

**Aline:** Maybe a Dixie cup.

**Craig:** Water’s disgusting.

**Aline:** Dixie cup here and there. Here I am with my… I’ve discovered these Nuun. It’s a product. They look like Sweetarts. You put them in water, and they make it lightly carbonated. They have very few calories. They have electrolytes in it, whatever that is.

**Craig:** Thank god.

**Aline:** It tastes good, makes me drink a lot more water. I was getting a lot of La Croix guilt, because there’s just so many cans with the La Croix. It felt so wasteful. These little Nuun tablets-

**Craig:** How do you spell Nuun? How do you spell it?

**Aline:** N-U-U-N, Nuun. N-U-U-N, I think it is. Yeah, Nuun.

**John:** Mike has those too. They’re good.

**Aline:** They’re good.

**Craig:** Nuun.

**Aline:** There’s a variety of flavors. Six bucks and you get 10 or 12 drinks for that. When you don’t feel like drinking water because it doesn’t have any flavor, this feels like a little treat. It’s a little sweet. It’s not aspartame or sorbitol either. I don’t like fake sugar very much. It’s just a little splash of hydration and electrolytes.

**Craig:** Little zhuzh.

**John:** The three of us talked. I think we were backstage before the last live show. I’m trying not to drink on weekdays, because as I get older, it’s harder to recover from it. I’m always looking for something else to drink instead of a cocktail or instead of a glass of wine.

**Aline:** I have this theory now that I think we’re going to look back on drinking the way we look at smoking.

**John:** Maybe.

**Craig:** I won’t.

**John:** It was delightful. Do you have time to think of a One Cool Thing?

**Craig:** I think we got two great-

**John:** We had two good ones there.

**Craig:** We got two terrific cool things. I’ll be back next week with a great cool thing.

**Aline:** You’re a sufficer. You know that.

**Craig:** On this topic, I am an absolute sufficer.

**Aline:** What’s the opposite of a sufficer? Optimizer. Optimizer.

**Craig:** Optimizer.

**John:** Optimizer.

**Craig:** On this one, I’m [crosstalk 00:56:14].

**Aline:** Craig is, in this instance, a relatively disagreeable sufficer. I love it.

**Craig:** Correct.

**John:** Love it.

**Aline:** Sounds like we’re done, but John, and you don’t have to broadcast this-

**Craig:** We’re done.

**Aline:** … but two people told me that you’re working on something so huge that it cannot be discussed.

**Craig:** Oh my god.

**Aline:** Then someone else told me that they read a pilot that you recently read, and it was maybe the best television pilot they’ve ever read.

**Craig:** Wait, that he’s recently written or read?

**Aline:** Written. Sorry, written. Sorry.

**Craig:** I was like, why is that a compliment to him? Somebody said you read something that was amazing.

**Aline:** Somebody said that you’re working on something so huge it cannot be discussed and that they recently read a TV pilot that you wrote and it was one of the best TV pilots they’d ever read.

**Craig:** Is it true?

**John:** It’s true I wrote a TV pilot. I think it’s really, really good.

**Craig:** I’m excited.

**John:** I don’t want to jinx anything by revealing it. I’m specifically keeping it a secret from friends, because I think it would be really exciting just for it to come out.

**Craig:** Love that. Boom.

**Aline:** I’m hearing rumblings, and I wanted to pass that along to you, because-

**John:** Thank you. I love that.

**Aline:** There’s bullshit rumors. There’s bullshit when people say to your face, “Oh, I think this is going to do great.” You’re like, “Shh.” When you start to hear these things where people are abuzz… They were like, “Do you know anything about it?” It’s huge and stuff. Whatever it is, I’m excited about it.

**Craig:** That’s exciting.

**John:** I’m keeping a lid on some stuff.

**Craig:** Keep a lid on it.

**John:** Keep a lid on it.

**Aline:** Woo!

**John:** It could make it difficult to make Scriptnotes, but we’ll make it work.

**Craig:** Or we just let Aline do it.

**John:** Aline and Megana take over the whole show.

**Aline:** That’s it. We’re ready.

**Craig:** [crosstalk 00:57:53].

**Aline:** The John August hive is going to…

**Craig:** The hive will take over.

**John:** That’s our show for this week. Scriptnotes is produced by Megana Rao.

**Craig:** What?

**John:** Edited by Matthew Chilelli. Our outro this week is by Nico Mansy. If you have an outro, you can send us a link to ask@johnaugust.com. That’s also the place where you can send questions. On Instagram and elsewhere, where should we find you, Aline?

**Aline:** I am still on Twitter, alinebmckenna. I am on Instagram, abmck. My company had an Instagram, Lean Machine. I’m sickeningly online probably for the next two weeks. I have encouraged people who don’t want to hear about this movie to unfollow me. My Instagram is just littered with Your Place or Mine promo. I’m very sorry if you are a personal friend of longstanding. You are definitely looking at your spouse and being like, “What the eff is wrong with her?” I got a movie coming out. I’m trying to do something.

**John:** You were emailing while we are talking to the people in charge. Do we know what time is it coming out?

**Aline:** 12 a.m. 12 a.m., so basically Thursday night.

**Craig:** It’s right there.

**Aline:** 12 a.m. EST.

**John:** February 4th.

**Aline:** February 9th technically. February 9th technically.

**John:** February 9th.

**Aline:** February 10th, but now I’ve just found out midnight February 9th. You guys are going to stay up until midnight, aren’t you?

**John:** Stay up late on February 9th so you can watch it.

**Craig:** Just so people don’t get confused, let’s say 12:01 a.m. February 10th. I think that’s going to-

**Aline:** Correct. Correct.

**Craig:** Otherwise, everyone’s going to get so confused.

**John:** I want Netflix’s numbers to show at 12:01 suddenly a bunch of people. That twas the Scriptnotes factor.

**Craig:** The Scriptnotes factor.

**Aline:** I will tell you that the other day I was talking to one of our old-school friends, and he was saying, “I’m just really thinking about what works on different platforms.” Then there was a pause, and I was like, “Did you ever think we would say a sentence like that?”

**Craig:** What works on different platforms.

**Aline:** Trying to figure out what works on different platforms.

**Craig:** Super Mario, it’s a platformer. Donkey Kong.

**John:** When’s it going to drop on streaming.

**Craig:** When’s it going to drop. That just sounds urological, doesn’t it?

**John:** You can find the show notes for this episode and all episodes at johnaugust.com. That’s also where you’ll find the transcripts and sign up for our weeklyish newsletter called Inneresting, which has lots of links to things about writing. We have T-shirts and they’re great. I think you’ll find them at Cotton Bureau. They’re basically all I wear.

**Craig:** That’s all I wear.

**John:** Hoodies also, so comfortable. Aline, do you have a hoodie? Do you have a Scriptnotes hoodie?

**Aline:** Sorry, I have very, very old Scriptnotes apparel. I have vintage Scriptnotes apparel.

**Craig:** What is happening over there?

**John:** Why’d you move your microphone?

**Craig:** Legitimately, what are you doing?

**Aline:** I put it to the side.

**John:** We still have a Bonus Segment to record. We still have a Bonus Segment to record.

**Aline:** Oh yeah. Oh, sorry. We have a Bonus Segment. Sorry. Sorry sorry sorry. I don’t have any current… We’ve taken a little break on this, but Megana and I are going to work on some female… You know what I think, Megana? Also a set. A workout, seamless sports bra and leggings set. Wouldn’t that be great? Like something you get from Outdoor Voices or Girlfriend Collective with Scriptnotes on it.

**John:** No idea.

**Craig:** Girlfriend Collective.

**Megana:** It’s going to drop soon. Look out.

**Craig:** It’s going to drop.

**Aline:** Like a Nikibiki vibe. If anybody knows what Nikibiki vibe… It’s a Nikibiki vibe.

**Craig:** I’m obsessed.

**John:** You can sign up to become a Premium Member at scriptnotes.net, where you get all the back-episodes and Bonus Segments. Matthew, god bless you. You’re going to have so much work on this episode. I apologize. Aline, thank you so much and congratulations on your movie.

**Craig:** Thank you, Aline. Congrats.

**Aline:** Woo!

[Bonus Segment]

**John:** We’re here for the Bonus Segment, and now we get to talk about Episode 3 of The Last of Us. Episode 4 will have already come out by the time this one’s dropped, so who knows?

**Craig:** Dropped.

**John:** Dropped. We’ve gotta say dropped as much as possible.

**Craig:** Everything keeps dropping.

**John:** What games would Bill and Frank have been playing? What activities would they have been doing, other than sex? They certainly don’t have puzzles. They totally could have had puzzles.

**Craig:** Neither one of them are interested in jigsaw puzzles, because jigsaw puzzles aren’t puzzles.

**Aline:** Wrong.

**Craig:** I am correct. Here’s what I think happens. My dad had this setup in our basement of a World War II reenactment on maps with little pieces and things. He was solo playing this war scenario game. I think Bill would absolutely be doing that. When Frank shows up, Frank is like, “No no no, I don’t want to do that. Let’s start with some simple things like Charades.” I think that they would’ve absolutely played Charades. I think it’s a fun thing to do. It doesn’t take up any resources.

**John:** Playing Charades just with each other, I guess.

**Aline:** How do you play Charades with two people?

**Craig:** You write a bunch of things down. Frank is only doing the charading. Bill only guesses. Bill doesn’t act. Bill doesn’t perform. It’s really just can Bill guess these things. I think they’ve done something like that. I think they might play cards. I don’t think they’re big on board games per se. That’s not how they connected. Neither one of them does crossword puzzles, which is a huge shame. Terrible shame.

**John:** Of the two of them, Bill would be more likely to do crossword puzzles.

**Aline:** You don’t think there’s an old Scrabble set knocking around there that they’re playing with?

**Craig:** They may have tried a couple of times.

**John:** Bill’s mom has Scrabble.

**Aline:** Rock ‘Em Sock ‘Em Robots?

**Craig:** No. You know what? There probably would be this old, musty Parcheesi that perhaps they pull out every now and again.

**John:** Yeah, because he would’ve also had his childhood games, because that’s apparently the house he grew up in.

**Craig:** It is the house he grew up in. He’s so into his survivalist stuff. Games are frivolous and will distract you from your goal, which is of course to defeat the forces of Armageddon.

**John:** Indeed. I want to talk to you about the filming of the episode, because I was curious, how many days did that episode take? There’s a lot happening. Aline measured how many strips were in an episode. The number of strips, number of setups and scenes in that were so vast. A lot happens.

**Craig:** Not as vast as some of our other episodes. I think that one was pretty on target for what our… Generally, our episodes were between 18 and 22 days of shooting. That one was probably around 19 or 20, I’m guessing.

**John:** What we’re seeing for the house-

**Aline:** Whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa.

**John:** Eighteen to 20, that’s a lot of days.

**Aline:** Eighteen to 20 per episode?

**Craig:** That’s right.

**John:** Crazy Ex-Girlfriend, you had all that time.

**Aline:** We had seven.

**Craig:** You were half-hours, in fair. You were half-hour.

**John:** They were not a half-hour show. They were an hour show.

**Craig:** You were an hour.

**Aline:** They were an hour show, 44 minutes, 42 minutes.

**Craig:** Forty-four minutes, okay. This was 72 or 73 minutes.

**John:** It was lengthy.

**Aline:** It was a whole ass movie. That’s why I tweeted what I did. John, you were wanting to ask something, because what I wanted to say about the episode is, have you guys done testing with dials? You’ve done testing with dials, right, [crosstalk 01:05:10]?

**John:** I’ve done dials, yeah, for a pilot.

**Craig:** I’ve never done it. I’ve heard about it.

**Aline:** I’ve done it. People really tend to… They’ll crank it. You’ll see somebody crank it. If you have dials in our house when Will and I watch something… Man, we are PB and J. I love the setup. I love the first 10 minutes of every action movie. Epilogues are my favorite. In every action movie or genre piece, there’s always the rest, where they make a campfire, whatever. I love those purely human, non-genre things.

The first two episodes are much more propulsive in genre stuff, which I do enjoy, but I am the one who’s always waiting for those human moments, because that’s what my work is. That’s what I love the most. This for me started with some genre stuff. I’m enjoying it. I love it. Literally, that episode to me is like a jar of honey-laced… I’m just rejecting drugs. It’s just like a big box of sprinkles, and I’m going to eat them all, because that is exactly what I love, which is watching human behavior in extreme.

**Craig:** I’m glad you liked it.

**Aline:** It is the best piece of anything I’ve seen about what it felt like to live through a pandemic, which is like, there’s just us here, these little decisions, I’m rotating the plate in a certain way, and that means something, and just all the human, human moments.

For me, it was very moving, because I’ve been married for 25 years, so pandemic or not. We’re empty-nesters now. It’s just two old people in a house, puttering around and saying, “Do you want the spring beans or do you want the green beans or the asparagus?” I really related to that.

Knowing that Craig’s been married a long time and how much he loves his family and the sweet, emotional, human, but also very concise way in which Craig is a sweetheart. I really do have to find this email that Craig sent me when my movie bombed. There’s just a particular way in which Craig is kind, and it’s very un-flowery. It’s very concise and simple.

The thing is, if the writing is too emotional, I won’t cry. There was so much space left for me to cry. I don’t cry very often in TV shows. The characters I love so much, but there’s just a particular kind of humanity that I find in Craig’s work that is this simple… Also, two more things. It’s funny. I really hate when these more masculine genres… No one’s funny. No one’s farting. No one’s giggling. No one’s barking a shin. It’s like, guys, that’s not what life is.

Then the other thing is, my god, every heavy genre thing is shot like Fincher. All these people owe Fincher money. It’s like that blue, brown, gray, milky. I love the way this show is shot with, when there’s bright sunlight, there’s bright sunlight. There’s vegetation everywhere. It doesn’t have an onerous stylistic overload, which I feel like a lot of these pieces really have. There’s something that feels almost very totalitarian. You’re trying to do a dystopia, but you’re dystoping me. This one is like, no, this is what the world is like, and there’s still sunshine, and there’s still strawberries, and there’s still wine to be poured.

When I love something, I really… Will will tell you. I was so excited about it because of all those things, but it really, really made me cry.

**Craig:** That’s very sweet. I’m very glad.

**John:** I have an actual question for you. What has impressed me most about-

**Craig:** That was outrageous, wasn’t it?

**John:** Sorry.

**Craig:** That was the most dismissive thing I’ve ever heard in my life. “I have an actual question.”

**John:** In addition to a phrase, I have a question. One of the things I enjoyed most about the episode was that we went through this long thing with Bill and Frank. It was gorgeously done and detailed and precise, but the fact that actually it had a purpose to pay off into the Ellie storyline. At what point did you know that was going to happen? From the initial conception, that was always going to be there?

**Craig:** Had to be.

**John:** Had to be. What did change though over the course of the writing, because one of the things you talked about on the podcast is sometimes you’d get really smart notes from people. Were there any things that you got notes on for the first draft to this last draft that things grew and changed and improved?

**Craig:** In all honesty, this largely was there in the first draft.

**John:** From the start.

**Craig:** There were changes that I made primarily for some practical considerations. Basically, that was what I wrote.

**John:** Great.

**Craig:** It was just sort of there.

**John:** It’s lovely when that happens. I’ve had a couple of movies where it’s happened, and other times there have been discoveries along the way. I was curious whether there was something that was a development, like someone’s like, “Oh, but what if… “

**Craig:** I have to tip my hat to HBO. They read it and they were like, “We love this.”

**John:** Great.

**Craig:** “Here are a couple of little things.” As we go, like I said, for budgetary purposes or location purposes or whatever, you have to change some things here or there, but it’s pretty much whatever.

**Aline:** It’s the biggest departure from the game, right? How did you decide to do that?

**Craig:** Yes. In the game, your perspective is always pinned to Joel, or later in the game, the perspective shifts, and you play as Ellie. Your perspective is always pinned to one or the other. You never leave them.

In the game, you must share the perspective of Joel as he arrives at Bill’s town. There is no Frank. Bill is angry and grouchy. He’s got the town rigged. The whole thing becomes a mission of figuring out where a car battery is, to get, to put in this car. It’s very mission-based because you need game-play. The character’s terrific. It’s just very different. It’s serving a different purpose, because the nature of that medium is quite different.

You do eventually find Frank, but in the game, Frank is dead. You don’t even see his face. You see his feet, because he’s hanged himself. He and Bill, you eventually figure out… Bill mentions him as his partner, and you just presume in a heteronormative way he’s talking about business partner or smuggling partner. It turns out, no, it’s a romantic partner. They basically broke up, and one of them lived on one side of the town. One of them lived on the other. They stopped talking to each other completely.

Then Frank was trying to leave, got infected, and killed himself and left a note behind that was the most bitter note ever. It was like, “This happened, and anyway, I’m better off. I’m glad I’m dead. It would be so much better being dead than spending one more day with you.” That relationship was presented in the game as a negative omen for Joel, like this is what happens to you if you don’t let anyone in.

**John:** Would a player always have found that, or could you have gone through the section and never discovered that?

**Craig:** You will always discover Frank, but that note is something that you have to choose to pick up and read. It’s one of the hallmarks of how Naughty Dog does their games. Those notes are gorgeous. There’s all this great stuff in it.

I thought that because we can shift perspective, we had an opportunity to, first of all, tell the story of what happens over 20 years through the lens of a relationship, which is generally what interests me, and then also to see a success.

These two guys love very differently. One is about improving the world, and the other is about protecting what matters to him, which is one person. They take care of each other, and they complement each other perfectly. They get to grow old together. They take care of each other. When it’s time to go, they go out on their own terms. As Nick Offerman playing Bill says, “I’m old. I’m satisfied, and you were my purpose.” To me, I needed the audience to understand that you can win. This is a brutal world. Aline, good news, there are going to be a lot of the dial turning scenes for you.

**Aline:** Cupcakes. Cupcakes.

**Craig:** Many, many more cupcakes coming, but it’s a tough world out there. The whole thing is about challenging Joel to open his heart up to this kid and what happens if he does and what are the risks and costs to him, but you can do it.

Like you said, there’s no point in doing the Bill and Frank story if it doesn’t have any direct bearing on Joel’s character and his relationship with Ellie. There have been a few people who just missed it. I don’t know how exactly, because it’s pretty clear. Bill leaves a note. Bill would never write the things in that note if he hadn’t met Frank. The note is about Frank. What he’s saying is, “You and I are here for literally only one reason, to protect the one person we love.” Joel has failed twice now. He’s failed to protect his own daughter. Now he’s failed to protect Tess. This is his last chance is this kid. If that note isn’t there, he’s a different man. That is why that story’s there.

**Aline:** That’s what is so great about TV is that you can take that detour and you have that time and you have that real estate. I’m always surprised if people don’t use it, or frankly, they overuse it. Sometimes things are so incredibly un-propulsive that you’re like, dude, give me a story, something. That balance between moving forward and resting is so…

You could probably do a podcast about that, an episode about that, where you move forward and where you rest. You need to let the audience rest. A lot of times, they just don’t let you. That’s why I often fall asleep in big budget movies, because when they get to the monsters, the vagina monsters and the flying caterpillars, I’m out. I’ve lost my human rooting interest.

**Craig:** How can we not call this episode vagina monsters and flying caterpillars?

**John:** I think so.

**Craig:** That’s pretty much what’s going on here.

**Aline:** That’s really what I care about, and so I really miss that. It was so funny, because one of the things that you do, Craig, that’s so confident, is that you don’t over-expositoritize. That’s what I was saying to you. That’s even in the racking, that you don’t rack. It’s like you can see it. You can see it. Then you had mentioned Bill and Frank a bunch even in the first two episodes. When I realized who it was, I turned to Will and I went, “That’s Bill and Frank.”

**Craig:** That’s what we’re going for.

**Aline:** I think that we sometimes forget how important it is for an audience to discover something. That’s one of the reasons it’s really important not to be noted to death, because when you’re noted to death, what people are doing is like, explain, explain, explain, rack now, rack now, explain exactly who they are. I am Bill. I am Frank. An audience is smart, and they’re going to get it.

The joy that I had when I realized, oh, this is who they’ve been talking about this whole time… What is this? What is the meaning of this? How are they going to meet? How is this? Because I trust you as a storyteller, I was like, oh, this is going to… To watch where the touchpoints, where the bones were going to drop in…

I think in action and genre particularly, it just gets bony towards the end. It’s just all fish bones. It’s like, let me still have my… When you go back and look at movies, even Die Hard or Rocky or things like that, you’re shocked at how little happens. So much happens in our movies now that it’s just like, I feel like there’s a point that usually comes at minute 62 where I’m just punched in the face for 20 minutes. I will get overloaded and fall asleep.

One of the things, Craig, is that because you come from writing comedy, because you come from writing things that weren’t super dramatic or whatever, I think you have a confidence in your comedic resting abilities. All the best stuff in most of these movies is… My favorite thing in Bourne Identity is when he washes her hair in the sink.

**Craig:** You are going to continue to enjoy this show, I think, because that’s definitely so much of what we do. It’s not to say that there aren’t going to be some sequences, including some enormous ones. The reason I wanted to do this show in the first place, it’s always primarily been about relationships.

The first couple of episodes are always hard, of anything, because you are building a world, introducing people, causing trauma, staging plot, and then motivating the things to begin. I will say that at this point with that episode, the first act of the season has concluded. We now begin the second act. We are ready to go with Joel and Ellie on this journey.

**Aline:** Felt that. Felt that with the car driving away. I felt that.

**Craig:** There are more, “Oh, that’s what that means,” to come.

**Aline:** You want a mix, right? You want a mix of things you’re discovering and things that are fed to you helpfully, because the other thing is I get very confused. I’m every joke TikTok about the mom who’s like, “Who is that? What is that? Who is that?”

The episode, spoiler alert, where you’re like, “When you step on the mushroom thing over here, it’s going to activate the other thing,” I was like, I’m just now counting down to when we activate all the outdoor mushroom people, which is not a sentence I’ve said ever before. I think it’s fine to do also the Mac and cheese story stuff.

In some point in Devil Wears Prada, she says, “If you can last here a year, you can have any job you want in the publishing business.” We say it one time, but it gets you through. You’re wanting to go, “Just quit, lady. Quit complaining and quit.” It’s such a good illustration for people of, you want to have those very clean, clear things, and then you want to have those delightful discovery things. To me, it feels like this is a chef who’s been cooking a very long time and has a lot of confidence and is not sweatily…

I’m just going to mention one more thing. Thank god that the people who are supposed to look like shit look like shit. I’m not kidding, because one of the weird sexist things is that when you watch a show, the men look like shit, and the women look like they stepped out of a hair and makeup trailer. Thank you for making… The women are supposed to look like shit. They look like shit.

**Craig:** I don’t know if I would go that far, but I would definitely say that we tried to keep everybody fairly realistic in the world. One of the things that was interesting about this episode is that we could depict two men not looking like shit, because they had a shower, they had clothes, they had resources.

**Aline:** That was nice. That was nice.

**Craig:** I did have this crazy moment on set where I had… We didn’t shoot our episodes in order.

**John:** How late in the season was this shot?

**Craig:** After the episode I directed, we went into this one. Then we went back and did the one that was the week before, because we needed time to put a lot of the effects in place. This one, we were like, “This isn’t as effects-heavy. We can do this one first.” I’d just come off directing that episode.

Every day, poor Anna Torv had to have this puffy eye thing stuck on to make her look all beaten up, which was incredibly uncomfortable. She was a real trooper about it. I get them out of the trailer. They come to set already ready to go. They just go back and get their touch-ups while we’re setting up after blocking. We’re doing this, and we come to the scene where they’re having their lunch, which is a flashback. Anna walks on set, and I’m like, “Oh my god, you’re beautiful.”

**John:** It was fun to see her out of all the distress makeup.

**Aline:** Again, that’s important. Her looking like you would, filthy, I’m sorry, but that’s a feminist act.

**John:** It was important for her to look great at that moment.

**Aline:** How many times in these movies where the man looks like a man would look and the woman looks like she’s had a vanity pass. Exactly what you said, which is then when someone gets a shower or a meal or does their hair, it has impact.

**Craig:** You notice it. Connie Parker was the head of our makeup department. She did such a good job. Makeup is like magic to me. She did such a good job of putting makeup on without ever seeming like anybody was wearing makeup, which is hugely important, especially when we’re talking about aging Pedro, because we aged Pedro every morning to play an older version of himself.

When we’re doing multiple versions, Anna Torv just got beaten up. It’s the next day. She’s not quite as beaten up. Now we’re going back in time. She’s not beaten up at all. As we go through this story, keep an eye on us, Aline, and keep giving me the makeup reports.

That was something that was important to me. There are shows that everyone, men and women, everyone first of all is gorgeous, and their hair is perfect and their makeup is perfect and everything is perfect and the lighting is perfect. We tried to be be more realistic.

**Aline:** The hardest I’ve ever laughed at that was… What’s the movie that Kevin Costner made in the West that was such a… Dances with Wolves. Dances with Wolves, people look generally pretty grubby. He looks pretty grubby. People look like they might in the West. Cut to Mary. What’s her last name? She has a several-thousand-dollar Jose Eber haircut. She has the most fabulously feathered hair. It’s incredible. It’s like how you would possibly have cut all those precision layers and then curled them with your round brush.

I’m very, very sensitive to that kind of thing. It really pulls me out. The women waking up with their full makeup on, all those things really pull me out. I think you don’t need it. You don’t need to add levels of un-reality. Again, I feel like this comes from confidence and from Craig being a competent chef who’s left in the kitchen to do what he needs to do. You don’t have anybody saying to you, “We got this beautiful woman. When is she going to rip her dress into a mini dress?”

**Craig:** That’s why she’s here, to be beautiful.

**Aline:** I’m going to be embarrassed if-

**Craig:** There are no mini dresses. Hair cutting will occur.

**Aline:** Great.

**Craig:** We talked a lot about hair and hair cutting and how would they be cutting their hair and what it would mean for them and all sorts of things like that. We try as best we can to… Look, in the second episode, Ellie wakes up, and pretty much the first thing she says is, “I have to pee.” No one ever has to pee in movies or television, but we do. We have to pee. The first thing I do when I wake up, I don’t know about you guys, I pee.

**John:** You go pee.

**Craig:** Anyway, our people pee.

**Aline:** No, I turn to the very handsome man in bed with me, and I’m fully made up. Then I start kissing him, even though I haven’t brushed my teeth.

**Craig:** Exactly.

**Aline:** I keep my bra on. It’s bonkers what we accept. I think what’s smart, Craig, is you’re in a genre world. You have enough tropes to go around. You don’t need to add extra ones. That’s what I really admire. Genre is there to give you those guardrails. When people ask me about romantic comedy, it’s like, sure, I’m going to have some of the things that you associate with the genre, just like you’re doing a zombie thing. Dead people looking weird are going to go argh across the frame, for sure.

**Craig:** They’re not dead.

**Aline:** That doesn’t change that you can still have a reality and emotion and talk about human beings. Genre gives you some nice guardrails with which to do it. I think Craig has an exceptional understanding of genre. If it’s identity thief, it’s going to use those conventions as a guardrail. To me, it’s like you’re going to use your genre pass on the zombie stuff, and by the way, do it well. I think that the enoki mushrooms are-

**Craig:** Not vagina monsters.

**Aline:** They’re not vagina monsters.

**John:** I think all Aline and I are saying is that it was a terrific episode.

**Craig:** Thank you.

**John:** A puzzle may have been too much, but it would’ve been fantastic.

**Craig:** Would’ve ruined it.

**John:** That is our episode.

**Craig:** Fantastic.

**John:** Thanks, Craig.

**Craig:** Thank you.

**John:** Thanks, Aline. Bye.

**Craig:** Thanks, guys.

**Aline:** Bye.

**Megana:** Thank you.

**Craig:** Bye.

Links:

* [Watch Your Place or Mine](https://www.netflix.com/title/81045831) on Netflix at 12:01am on 2/10/23
* [Showtime and Paramount+ Merging, With Rebrand Planned](https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/paramount-showtime-merger-linear-streaming-programming-changes-1235312987/)
* [‘Westworld’ Gets New Home As Warner Bros. Discovery Strikes Roku & Tubi FAST Channel Deals](https://deadline.com/2023/01/westworld-gets-new-home-as-warner-bros-discovery-strikes-roku-tubi-fast-channel-deals-1235245347/)
* [Cancellations Of Completed Seasons Of TV Series; Experts Weigh In On Whether Trend Will Continue](https://deadline.com/2023/01/write-offs-completed-seasons-tv-series-experts-weigh-in-on-trend-1235242805/)
* [Salem 1692](https://facadegames.com/products/salem-1692) Game
* [Nuun Hydration Tablets](https://nuunlife.com/pages/products)
* [Get a Scriptnotes T-shirt!](https://cottonbureau.com/people/scriptnotes-podcast)
* [Check out the Inneresting Newsletter](https://inneresting.substack.com/)
* [Gift a Scriptnotes Subscription](https://scriptnotes.supportingcast.fm/gifts) or [treat yourself to a premium subscription!](https://scriptnotes.supportingcast.fm/)
* [Aline Brosh McKenna](https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0112459/) on [Twitter](https://twitter.com/alinebmckenna) and [Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/abmck/)
* [Craig Mazin](https://twitter.com/clmazin) on Twitter
* [John August](https://twitter.com/johnaugust) on Twitter
* [John on Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/johnaugust/?hl=en)
* [John on Mastodon](https://mastodon.art/@johnaugust)
* [Outro](http://johnaugust.com/2013/scriptnotes-the-outros) by Nico Mansy ([send us yours!](http://johnaugust.com/2014/outros-needed))
* Scriptnotes is produced by [Megana Rao](https://twitter.com/MeganaRao) and edited by [Matthew Chilelli](https://twitter.com/machelli).

Email us at ask@johnaugust.com

You can download the episode [here](http://traffic.libsyn.com/scriptnotes/586standardv2.mp3).

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Newsletter

Inneresting Logo A Quote-Unquote Newsletter about Writing
Read Now

Explore

Projects

  • Aladdin (1)
  • Arlo Finch (27)
  • Big Fish (88)
  • Birdigo (2)
  • Charlie (39)
  • Charlie's Angels (16)
  • Chosen (2)
  • Corpse Bride (9)
  • Dead Projects (18)
  • Frankenweenie (10)
  • Go (29)
  • Karateka (4)
  • Monsterpocalypse (3)
  • One Hit Kill (6)
  • Ops (6)
  • Preacher (2)
  • Prince of Persia (13)
  • Shazam (6)
  • Snake People (6)
  • Tarzan (5)
  • The Nines (118)
  • The Remnants (12)
  • The Variant (22)

Apps

  • Bronson (14)
  • FDX Reader (11)
  • Fountain (32)
  • Highland (75)
  • Less IMDb (4)
  • Weekend Read (64)

Recommended Reading

  • First Person (87)
  • Geek Alert (151)
  • WGA (162)
  • Workspace (19)

Screenwriting Q&A

  • Adaptation (65)
  • Directors (90)
  • Education (49)
  • Film Industry (489)
  • Formatting (128)
  • Genres (89)
  • Glossary (6)
  • Pitches (29)
  • Producers (59)
  • Psych 101 (118)
  • Rights and Copyright (96)
  • So-Called Experts (47)
  • Story and Plot (170)
  • Television (165)
  • Treatments (21)
  • Words on the page (238)
  • Writing Process (177)

More screenwriting Q&A at screenwriting.io

© 2026 John August — All Rights Reserved.