• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

John August

  • Arlo Finch
  • Scriptnotes
  • Library
  • Store
  • About

Search Results for: book rights

Scriptnotes, Ep 162: Luck, sequels and bus money — Transcript

September 19, 2014 Scriptnotes Transcript

The original post for this episode can be found [here](http://johnaugust.com/2014/luck-sequels-and-bus-money).

**John August:** Hello and welcome. My name is John August.

**Craig Mazin:** My name is Craig Mazin.

**John:** And this is Scriptnotes, a podcast about screenwriting and things that are interesting to screenwriters.

Craig, did you buy your iPhone last night?

**Craig:** You know I did, at 12:01.

**John:** Did you go to Apple or where’d you go?

**Craig:** Verizon. That’s my secret move.

**John:** We went to Verizon as well. So we tried the Apple move, it didn’t happen, so we went out on Verizon.

**Craig:** Apple, even when I went to bed at 1 o’clock —

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** “Oh, we’re working on our story, we’re going to…” I’m like what is going on with? So did you watch the —

**John:** The live stream —

**Craig:** Oh my god.

**John:** Was just a mess.

**Craig:** Did you do it through Apple TV?

**John:** We did both through Apple TV and also streaming through the computer, yeah.

**Craig:** On the web. Okay, so I didn’t even bother with the website. I just went down to Apple TV.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** When it finally started to work —

**John:** It was beautiful.

**Craig:** It was awesome. But that was well into it, like 40 minutes in or something. So if you could even get it to work, it would work for 20 seconds at a time and there was a Chinese woman speaking over the whole thing. How did they not get that right?

**John:** Yeah. That TV truck.

**Craig:** Oh man.

**John:** What I love about the time that we live in is that the TV truck had its own Twitter feed within like the first three minutes of that going on. And the TV truck was just like tweeting out some good stuff.

**Craig:** Oh, they were, like “We know…”

**John:** Yeah. Or no, just like TV truck just like, you know, hey guys, what’s going on? It’s like, you know, did something happen today? [laughs]

**Craig:** [laughs]

**John:** And we live in a glorious time.

**Craig:** Or somebody invented the TV truck.

**John:** Somebody invented the TV truck Twitter feed.

**Craig:** Oh, I thought there was actually somebody on the TV truck who’s like, we know, we’re working on it.

**John:** No, no, no, it was just —

**Craig:** So an Apple TV truck that came out there and —

**John:** I love that they anthropomorphized the TV truck.

**Craig:** That’s so funny.

**John:** And they’re like, what’s going on?

**Craig:** Hey guys, why is everyone upset?

**John:** Yeah. I think it’s pretty cool.

**Craig:** And it was very annoying.

**John:** [laughs] But the Chinese woman next to me is so sweet.

**Craig:** Right. [laughs]

**John:** She won’t stop talking.

**Craig:** There’s a Chinese woman and then the Chinese woman went away, which was amazing, but then a very quiet German man started —

**John:** Snuck back in there, yeah.

**Craig:** Yeah, did you hear him?

**John:** Yeah, it’s good.

**Craig:** And then it was start and stop and start and stop. But then finally, they got it and it was working great.

**John:** Whenever you do something where like everything has to work perfectly immediately with no practice, you’re going to run into some issues.

**Craig:** But it’s Apple. I mean, just to put it in perspective, they have more money in reserves than probably 50% of the nations on earth.

**John:** Yeah, but I mean —

**Craig:** And yet they can’t get that right?

**John:** Well, they’re not a broadcaster though. So it’s one thing if you’re like NBC and you’re running the Super Bowl.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** Like you’re going to have a lot of people with tremendous experience, but to have to be able to do this and then be able to keep it all secret, that’s the challenging thing they were trying to do.

**Craig:** I get that. That is exactly what the guy who just got fired said —

**John:** [laughs] Absolutely.

**Craig:** Right before he got fired, because you know somebody got fired.

**John:** If my Tim Cook impression were ready —

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** I would explain it in Tim Cook words about sort of how —

**Craig:** “It’s really unacceptable.”

**John:** Unacceptable, yeah.

**Craig:** “So interesting how you failed.”

**John:** [laughs]

**Craig:** [laughs]

**John:** So the important thing is which iPhone did you get.

**Craig:** I got the “small.”

**John:** Yeah, that’s what I got.

**Craig:** The iPhone 6, the non-plus version, which is still bigger than this one. So they had a very useful graphic on the website where you could see, okay, here’s what it looks like now, here’s the 6, here’s the 6 Plus. Well, that thing just looked ridiculous to me.

**John:** Yeah, but it won’t look ridiculous a few years from now. We’ll have come to accept it that —

**Craig:** You think so that everyone’s going to walk around with these —

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Dinner plates, as Rian Johnson calls it?

**John:** Mm-hmm.

**Craig:** Ryan got the dinner plate.

**John:** Yeah, of course.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** Because he loves to read scripts on his phone. And one of the things we had to do this week is scramble to get Weekend Read to work right on the big phones. And so —

**Craig:** On the Plus.

**John:** Yeah, and also on the 6.

**Craig:** Oh, right, because —

**John:** It’s also bigger, so.

**Craig:** Was it really hard to do?

**John:** It was challenging to do because Apple hadn’t given you a good warning that — they give you a warning that bigger screens were coming in a very general sense.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** Didn’t tell you how big the screens were and they didn’t tell you that you had to sort o recreate all your graphics at three times resolution.

**Craig:** Ah.

**John:** And so that was a lot of scrambling to get that to work.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** And make sure — and you’re testing these apps when you don’t actually have the phone to put them on. And so that’s really challenging.

**Craig:** But were you able to do it?

**John:** We were able to do it.

**Craig:** Well, that’s interesting.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** And how many people work here? [laughs]

**John:** Oh, we have about three and a half people who work here.

**Craig:** Three and a half people work here, huh?

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** I wonder how long it will take Final Draft.

**John:** Ah, we’ll see.

**Craig:** Probably a couple hundred years.

**John:** That’ll be fine.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** It’ll be fine. Today on the show, we are going to answer a whole bunch of questions. But first, we need to do a little bit of follow-up. Last week, we talked about the possibility of new t-shirts.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** And t-shirts are going to happen. So if you’re listening to this podcast on Tuesday, likely hopefully the store should be open, store.johnaugust.com.

**Craig:** That fast.

**John:** That fast.

**Craig:** Wow.

**John:** To preorder your t-shirts. So we’re doing the same thing we did before. Basically, Craig is nodding his head towards Stuart. This is basically Stuart’s realm. Stuart will have to be taking all those orders and he writes them down on little tickets and he puts them on little hangers.

**Craig:** That’s right. [laughs]

**John:** So what we do with our t-shirts like last time, we do preorders for two weeks. And then at the end of those two weeks we see how many t-shirts we need to make. We make those t-shirts and we ship them out all at once.

**Craig:** Stuart sits in — there’s a basement here and we give him a little visor, a little green visor and he’s got one of those little adding machines like the guys in Brazil.

**John:** Mm-hmm.

**Craig:** And it’s real dusty down there.

**John:** Well, the pneumatic tubes though, I think that was really the innovation and —

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** It’s quite good. So one of the little things comes in and he has to sort them into their little things.

**Craig:** And then he hits a belt, ding, and then —

**John:** There’s a crow who we trained who sort of helps him out and who could sort of like recognize the types and he can come put them into the different boxes.

**Craig:** That’s what that crow does? I thought it just squawked at him to keep him motivated. [laughs]

**John:** Well, also it takes care of like the other rodents down in the basement but it’s just, you know —

**Craig:** It’s just him and his —

**John:** His companionship.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** I mean, I’m not a monster.

**Craig:** It gets cold down there and he asks for extra coal and we say no. [laughs]

**John:** [laughs] No. Like sell more t-shirts and then you can have more coal.

**Craig:** But he’ll never get more coal.

**John:** So if you’d like to keep Stuart warm, you can check out store.johnaugust.com and see the t-shirts we have for sale.

**Craig:** [laughs]

**John:** So there’s a Scriptnotes t-shirt that Craig just saw, the pencil sketch version of the design.

**Craig:** Oh, so cool. I mean, I can’t say what it is, can I?

**John:** Oh, people can go to the site to see. I think we can describe because we’re a podcast of words, so we should be able to use our words to describe, so describe it.

**Craig:** Well, this is so cool. And who did this?

**John:** This is done by Simon Estrada who is just the best.

**Craig:** Okay, so Simon Estrada, well done. So it’s in the Sons of Anarchy style. It’s like a motorcycle t-shirt. It’s really cool. It’s got Scriptnotes in that crazy motorcycle script and then what appears to be an exploding typewriter on fire which is so cool. [laughs] And then underneath it, it says, “The podcast of umbrage and reason.” It’s just bad ass in the most ridiculous way. [laughs]

**John:** [laughs]

**Craig:** I mean, because what’s funny about it is that nobody is less bikery than screenwriters.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** I mean, a screenwriting biking club would be pathetic.

**John:** Yeah

**Craig:** That’s why I like it.

**John:** The Venn diagram of screenwriters and hardcore motorcycle enthusiasts.

**Craig:** Yes.

**John:** It’s not much overlap there.

**Craig:** No, but that’s why I think it works.

**John:** Right.

**Craig:** That’s awesome.

**John:** So if you’d like to check that out, you can go to the store and see what that looks like. Also in the store we’re going to have Highland t-shirts. If you want a Highland t-shirt, we’ll have those. And we’re going to try a hoodie. And so we can’t do — a Scriptnotes hoodie doesn’t really make sense because there’s — we wanted to do an embroidery, like a little embroidered hoodie thing.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** And there’s no way to sort of do a good Scriptnotes logo that could actually fit in embroidery that would translate. We’re going to try the Brad from johnaugust.com, my little logo for my site.

**Craig:** Okay.

**John:** So if you would like one of those hoodies, you can get one of those hoodies. The only warning I’ll say about the hoodies is that we have to hit a certain minimum in order to actually make those hoodies. So there’s a chance that you could order that hoodie and we could say, you know what, we’re not going to make those hoodies, we’ll refund your money.

**Craig:** Got it. And that basically comes down to Stuart again, just can he —

**John:** How —

**Craig:** Can he spin enough flacks?

**John:** Exactly, his little hands that work on it.

**Craig:** We don’t give him a wheel, you know.

**John:** So orders start today, Tuesday, September 16th. Orders end Tuesday, September 30th and then we are going to be shipping the shirts starting October 8th. So you’ll have it in time for Austin.

**Craig:** What an empire. Oh yes, and so you’ll have to report back to me and let me know how everybody — oh, there’s your cat again.

**John:** Yeah. That’s not my cat. That’s Patricia Arquette’s cat.

**Craig:** Got it.

**John:** That’s Patricia Arcat.

**Craig:** That’s Patricia Arcat.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** That’s right. I remember Patricia Arcat from last time.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** I think she and I have the same birthday.

**John:** Oh how nice is that.

**Craig:** Did I mention this last time?

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** I can’t —

**John:** You know, you don’t see movies, so you haven’t seen Boyhood yet, have you?

**Craig:** I have not seen Boyhood yet, I’m sorry. I did see…I saw…I’ve seen some lately.

**John:** [laughs] You saw Guardians of the Galaxy?

**Craig:** Yeah, I saw Guardians of the Galaxy. I watched actually, this is embarrassing, so I haven’t seen Boyhood but the other day I wasn’t feeling, you know, I got the stomach flu.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** So I was in my office and just feeling very bad. And I sat on my couch and I went to Apple TV and I dialed up All About Eve.

**John:** I haven’t seen All About Eve for so long. I love All About Eve.

**Craig:** It’s great. It’s just great.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** It’s great. They don’t make them like that anymore.

**John:** Yeah. And so when I watch All About Eve, I’m like, someone should make a musical version of All About Eve. And of course, they did. It’s called Applause and —

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** It’s apparently not a good musical.

**Craig:** No, but there’s a couple of good songs in Applause.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** But yeah, no —

**John:** But it lends itself so well to that sort of backstage drama. A great version of an All About Eve musical is a great musical.

**Craig:** Absolutely, yeah. It is a shame that it didn’t kind of go better for them.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** But great stuff.

**John:** My Apple TV this week was Match Point which I had somehow never seen, which I loved. You know, that Scarlett Johansson, I think she has a real career in front of her.

**Craig:** You know, we’ll see. We have to wait.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** I like to wait at least 20 or 30 years.

**John:** Just to let us know.

**Craig:** Like just last week I thought to myself, I think Jodie Foster, she’s okay.

**John:** Yeah, so you put her on a casting list.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** Like let’s take a look at this young woman and see if —

**Craig:** She’ll stick around.

**John:** I think she could be really good.

**Craig:** Yeah. Dustin Hoffman?

**John:** Oh, there’s one to watch.

**Craig:** No, no, I think he’s crossed over to good.

**John:** Okay.

**Craig:** He’s good but I can’t, you know, these new ones like Brad Pitt or whatever, I can’t —

**John:** No, no.

**Craig:** No.

**John:** Yeah, whatever happened to the classics, whatever happened to the classic actors? [laughs]

**Craig:** [laughs]

**John:** I completely flamed out, I’m like, who’s any actor who’s of the time before that? He’s no Charlton Heston is really what I’m going for.

**Craig:** I wish that you could have all seen, [laughs], the panic on John’s face as his brain moved super fast.

**John:** You can see the panic on my face if you join us at the Slate Live Culture Gabfest.

**Craig:** Oh yeah.

**John:** On October 8th at the Belasco Theater. There’s still some tickets left for that. So Craig, in the midst of his stomach flu this week, he emailed me to say like, man, is the Slate thing still on? I’ve got bad stomach flu, I don’t think I can make it.

**Craig:** For some reason I thought I hadn’t —

**John:** You’re a month off. You traveled though time.

**Craig:** I had it in my calendar that it was this week.

**John:** Yeah, it’s not. It’s October 8, so you can come join us for that.

**Craig:** October 8. Well, hopefully I won’t be throwing up and —

**John:** So there’s a link in the show notes for that.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** So let’s get to these questions.

**Craig:** Throwing up is the worst.

**John:** I haven’t thrown up since sixth grade. I’m not sure I physically can. I’ve tried.

**Craig:** That’s amazing to me.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** So you haven’t even gotten gastroenteritis or any food poisoning or anything?

**John:** I’ve gotten some food poisoning but it never came up that way.

**Craig:** Really?

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** But you didn’t feel even nauseated?

**John:** Yes, I felt incredibly nauseated and really wanted to throw up, I just can’t.

**Craig:** Oh, you’re one of those.

**John:** I actually can’t throw up. I can put my finger down my throat and do everything but I cannot actually get it to come up.

**Craig:** Really?

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** That’s the best proof we have yet that you’re not human. [laughs]

**John:** [laughs] Indeed.

**Craig:** You’re entirely synthetic.

**John:** All my little robot parts would come spilling out.

**Craig:** You’re just completely synthetic.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** All right, let’s hit the questions, shall we?

**John:** All right.

**Craig:** All right.

**John:** Ryan from Chicago writes, “Given the trend towards sequels, why are stories based on existing material still being shoehorned into single features? Ender’s Game is a good recent example. The story is naturally broken into two parts, pre and post battle school, and the extra space would have given the filmmakers time to explore some of the more interesting aspects of the novel.”

**Craig:** Good question. There’s a risk reward analysis that has to go on here. You’ve got a book that theoretically you could tell in two movies. But what that means is that the first movie ends with sort of a cliffhangery thing.

**John:** Mm-hmm.

**Craig:** The ending is a big part of the experience of the movie. So Star Wars: A New Hope is the first of a trilogy but it ends. It’s got an ending. If that had been a book, people would have been like, why is this book ending so soon? Why isn’t there more book? Okay, I see, we’ll start it up again.

And Ender’s Game may have not had, you know, it says it’s naturally broken into two parts but does that first part end in a satisfying way?

**John:** Exactly.

**Craig:** And if it doesn’t, then basically you’re saying, come back for the rest of the story and people might go, no.

**John:** The last Harry Potter was split into two parts. And there was a lot of — tremendous amount of material was — the ending was sort of cliffhangery but you could sort of do it at that point because you already made seven movies, you’re going to come back for the eighth. You’re already that committed. I think my sort of two points.

First is, adaptations in general are really tough. You have to look at sort of, this is a book that works really well as a book. But what parts of this book are going to work really well as a movie? And they may not translate very directly. And so —

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** I’m not familiar with Ender’s Game and sort of how it worked as a book. But they made their choice about sort of what they thought people wanted to see from that, what they thought would work.

The second sort of big fundamental issue is you can’t make two movies until you make one movie. And so, to come into it saying like we have to make this as two movies, well good luck with that.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** And so you have to pick the movie you’re going to make and you’re probably going to try to make one movie before you can plan the sequel.

**Craig:** Yeah, unless you’re dealing with an existing property that is already divided up.

**John:** Yeah, Lord of the Rings is a classic example.

**Craig:** Lord of the Rings. Now even in Lord of the Rings, the Weinsteins had the rights and did not want to roll the dice and say, yeah, we want to do it as three movies because you’re right, you’re green-lighting three movies, not one. And if the first one is a disaster, what are you going to do with the other two? Just not make them and they just never get continued? So eventually Peter Jackson left and went to New Line and New Line rolled the dice on that and obviously to great success, so.

**John:** Going back to Harry Potter, Steven Spielberg was originally interested in directing Harry Potter and so he was involved with the very early versions of it. Apparently, he really wanted to combine aspects of the first two books and J.K. Rowling said no.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** It has to be the books as the books. And so that’s an example of like trying to rearrange things that you think would make a better movie and the author of the book say, no, it has to be this way.

**Craig:** It’s remarkable. You know, good for her.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** I mean it’s tough to say no to Steven Spielberg and I suppose I would always in the back of my mind think, well, what would that have been like though with Steven Spielberg. One of the most remarkable directorial achievements I think ever in film history is Christopher Columbus’s casting of the first movie.

**John:** Incredible.

**Craig:** Incredible. I mean, to get three kids, each one of them perfectly right not only for the first movie but as human beings who would then be able to not fall apart [laughs], bloat, do drugs, go crazy, look the right way the whole way through. Incredible.

**John:** Yeah, I think you also have to, you know, credit Chris Columbus but also David Heyman, the Producer to —

**Craig:** True.

**John:** Sort of keeping that ship running and keeping it intact. Because beyond those first three kids, you look at like the Neville Longbottom we got. Look at all those kids —

**Craig:** Right, perfect.

**John:** You know, all those kids —

**Craig:** Perfect —

**John:** You know, Malfoys.

**Craig:** Yeah, Draco, perfect.

**John:** The adults, they kept coming through —

**Craig:** The adults. Perfect.

**John:** Even when they had to change out Dumbledore, seamless.

**Craig:** Seamless and perfect.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** The casting was outrageously good top to bottom. They made no mistakes. And I also give Christopher Columbus a lot of credit for setting the look of the movies. Did he make the best of the Harry Potter movies?

**John:** No.

**Craig:** No. And I don’t think Christopher Columbus would say, “Yes, I’m, you know what, Alfonso Cuarón is, I’m just as good of a director.” No, some people are better than others. Alfonso Cuarón is one of the best ever —

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** At everything. I’ve never seen a bad Alfonso Cuarón movie. But Christopher Columbus did so much right in that first one, so much. And they were there supervising the initial music by John Williams. I mean, all these decisions that were made were right.

**John:** Yeah. Well, looking at a giant franchise like that, you really are starting like a company, a business that is going to go on — it’s like Apple Compute. And you have to make these fundamental decisions quite early on and sort of live with the ramifications of these decisions.

**Craig:** Live with them.

**John:** And in the case of these kids, they had to pick these kids and then they decided, you know what, we’re just going to open a school and we’re just basically have to educate these kids the whole time through because they’re basically always going to be working on these movies. So those kids, you know, they’re in school most of the day.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** Especially, you know, having made Charlie and the Chocolate Factory in London, you get those kids for like two hours a day. And so it’s really tough to —

**Craig:** It’s hard to make those —

**John:** Make your schedule.

**Craig:** But my god, the way that they just, everything worked out for them, incredible. All right, next question. Wade writes… is this all Wade’s question?

**John:** Wade has a long question.

**Craig:** Woo-hoo. Well, I’ll kind of…yeah.

**John:** But I mean, leave in Wade’s question because I think it’s actually interesting.

**Craig:** Okay. Wade writes, “I’ve been a writer-director for over a decade now and I’ve done everything I can think to do. I went to film school, crewed for free, written nine spec scripts and polished them to death, picked up three options, two of which I did for free. And all of which died before they garnered a budget.

“I started a production company and produced two feature films using my own money. Several of my scripts are placed in the quarter finals of decent competitions. And my first feature took awards at both festivals that it aired at. So I’ve been given just enough hope over the years to affirm my suspicions that I’m not delusional, I’m actually good at what I do but not enough to really drive the point home.”

Okay, so that’s part one of the Wade question trilogy. Part two. “I recently saw a lead that a literary manager of note was looking for contest winners, so I sent my first blind query in years and got a nibble. But in the end, he passed, commenting that the script was engaging, had some pretty strong writing but he wasn’t passionate enough to fight or get the story made. My second feature that I produced myself on a shoestring budget is about to finish and hit the festival circuit and once again I’m reminded that I have no friends or ins or powerful allies in the industry. I have lots of friends in the industry that I deeply respect but they’re all scrappers like me fighting to make it happen. And my friends are getting younger as I’m about to cross into that magical 40s era of my career that you both have been chatting about of late.”

It’s funny that 40s is now a good thing.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Whereas when we started it was considered old and bad. Okay, the exciting conclusion of Wade’s question, “It’s possible that my second feature will open doors but it’s also possible it will meet a fate similar to my first film: get a little recognition but ultimately not sell. I’m trying to avoid the emotional wreck that would be made of me if that happens. I feel like I’m a little stuck. I don’t think I can afford to pour my family’s resources into a third produce-it-yourself project and have no prospects to introduce me to real managers or agents. How the eff does someone with no friends in the industry acquire,” I think he means effing, not offing, “effing representation in this industry?”

Oh my, well, what do you think, John?

**John:** The reason why I wanted to have his questions sort of in full is that I think it tells, you know, an interesting and full narrative about sort of people who I don’t think we hear from enough, which is that frustration of like, it’s not like somebody just wrote a script and like, eh, screw it, I’m not really a screenwriter. This is a person who’s been plugging at it for quite a long time and he’s had some success but hasn’t had enough success to sort of keep rolling.

And so this is a person who classically has been doing the kinds of things we talk about doing. It’s like he didn’t just write one script, he wrote nine scripts. He went off and made a feature. He went off and made another feature. And it’s still not all clicking. And I think sometimes we see the success stories and we see sort of like, oh these are the people who did all the right things and then it all worked out. And we don’t see the not success stories.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** And so I wanted to sort of talk through Wade’s sort of real situation and sort of what the possibilities are here.

**Craig:** It’s frustrating to obviously to think about. And first of all, thank you for sharing all that with us. A couple of things come to mind. I’ll take the second one first. Ultimately, real friends in the industry is an overrated thing. I think you’re looking at that as the piece of the puzzle you’re missing and therefore that is the piece of the puzzle that is at fault here. And it’s not actually.

You said you placed in the quarter finals in many decent competitions. Well, if you had been a winner of one of those, you wouldn’t need these friends. Friends would come find you. That’s just sort of the way it goes, you know. You took awards at a couple of smaller festivals, which is fine, but if your film had gotten into one of the larger ones, again, you wouldn’t need the friends, they would come to you.

So the real question then is to evaluate what’s going on with the work and why, for instance, a literary manager said, yeah, you know, engaging, pretty strong writing, but he wasn’t passionate enough to fight to get the story made. Okay. I’m going to take you at your word that you’re pretty good. And I think that that’s actually quite possible. I’m not shining you on. I think a lot of people out there are pretty good.

The frustrating part about our business is that it’s not enough to be pretty good. You have to take a pretty good person and have them do pretty good writing on something that is an idea that fits them right. You know, like on American Idol they’re like, that song choice, it’s all about song choice because they can all sing and then it really is about song choice. Like what opens you up and shows your personality and is fun and interesting and effective. It may be that you’re writing the wrong things. That’s one possibility.

Then the other one, which is a little dimmer admittedly, is that pretty good isn’t good enough and that you have to be a lot good and that you have to be special and that you have to write things that people look at and say, okay, well, nobody else could write this.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** I don’t know, what do you think, John?

**John:** I think there’s some aspect of luck that we’re not talking about maybe enough in the show which is that as I look back in my own career, I worked really, really hard, I wrote good things and people liked them. But there were certainly moments of which I had sort of good luck. And it’s very easy to imagine, having just seen Match Point, I’m going to use the metaphor that Woody Allen uses in that, which is that the tennis ball hits the top of the net and it falls over one way or it falls over the other way and the whole game is won or lost based on that.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** And there are some situations which the right person read the script at the right time, it was just everything sort of worked out just right. And so Go was an example of that where like everyone had passed but one person said yes and that one person who said yes was just enough to get it sort of going and rolling. You haven’t had that luck. You haven’t had that lucky break.

But it’s also possible that, looking back, you haven’t created situations which you could be lucky. You haven’t met those people who could have sort of read that thing or you have been reluctant to show that thing or you haven’t reached out and read someone else’s script to sort of help them out. You haven’t sort of done all that work. But that’s all the past. And I think some of what I’m reading here is kind of that sunken cost fallacy which is that sense that in writing these nine spec scripts and making these things, you’ve built this identity for yourself as a writer-director and you are incredibly reluctant to give up on the very specific nature of that dream that you’ve had for a long time.

But if you were to be able to start fresh here now and say, “I can do anything I want from this moment forward,” what would you say? And if you want to use any of that stuff from before, that’s awesome. But you also have permission today to move forward and decide what is it you’ve most want to do right now because you’re not burdened by all those things in the past. And that can be a good thing, too.

**Craig:** Yeah, all of the things in the past are necessary to get you to wherever you are now. And either the cumulative experience is what ultimately synthesizes into something that people really love and gets you a lot of attention or it synthesizes into a decision that actually you want to try other things and that this is not how you want to keep going. That’s up to you obviously. That’s a very personal thing.

You know, I’m not a big luck guy but I am a probability guy. I’m a math guy. And I think that every script has a certain factor to it, a percentage factor, a probability that somebody will like it. And as we’ve said before, actually in a weird way, the odds are on our side because we just need one hit. That’s it. One hit. You swing a hundred times, if you connect once, you win. Just like on Go.

A lot of these things have, I assume, been seen by lots of people and read by lots of people and no one’s hit. That means that there’s, it’s just the factor there wasn’t happening. That it’s less about luck and more about the material, which by the way, this is why people cling to those stories. The, you know, Confederacy of Dunces story. Nobody wanted it, everyone hated it, I killed myself but then, Pulitzer Prize, you know. Okay, you know, once in a century but [laughs] —

**John:** Yeah. That story is notable because it is the exception and there’s a hundred other examples —

**Craig:** That’s right.

**John:** Ten thousand examples that didn’t happen.

**Craig:** Yeah, I think that your advice to give yourself the permission to start fresh is exactly what you need, is exactly what Wade needs, because regardless of how competent you’ve been till now, it’s not working.

**John:** Yeah. There’s a screenwriter we both know and I was talking with her and she said she had sort of hit a point in her career that she was getting really frustrated. And so things were getting made that she wanted to get made and she was having some issues and so she decided to take a real honest hard look at her writing. She read a lot of other people’s writing and she decided, you know what, my writing may not be as good as it was and I’m going to work on getting my writing better, which is one of the only times I actually heard a screenwriter say that. But it was a really honest self-identity questioning move on her part.

And she said it really worked, it really helped, and it really made her look at sort of what are the words she’s putting on the page, what are the stories she’s trying to tell, what are the choices she’s making. And in some ways, it is that break from who she was before and what she wants to be doing next.

**Craig:** Yeah, that’s exactly it.

**John:** Next question comes from M. Robert in Texas who writes, “Years back, a movie came out that was based on a very popular TV series. Needless to say, the movie did not do well. I’ve begun writing a movie, which I believe tells the story from a different perspective. Am I wasting my time without first getting permission from the creatures of the TV series itself?” Well, creators of the TV series itself. I think it would be great if one of the creatures of the TV series…

“Or do I need to have a screenplay written before I approach them about a second go at this franchise? This happens all the time with the Hulk movies. But at what point am I working for not because I need to gain permission to pursue my vision?”

**Craig:** This does not happen all the time. I don’t know what he’s talking about. The Hulk movies were not written on spec by people. They were commissioned very carefully.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** You know, this question comes up a bunch.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Made me kind of curious about, first of all, like M. Robert, like is it monsieur Robert or like M. Robert? Anyway, I like with the way it opens, “Years back, a movie came out that was based on a very popular TV series. Needless to say, the movie did not do well.” Why is that needless to say? I think that’s needful to say actually.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** It’s not like, oh those TV series, they never work out.

**John:** No.

**Craig:** No, nobody ever, The Addams Family movie, bomb.

**John:** Bomb, yeah.

**Craig:** Well, it did pretty well.

**John:** Yeah, it did.

**Craig:** I think that you aren’t going to get permission from the creators or creatures of the TV series itself. They don’t know you and there’s no reason for them to give you their precious intellectual property. You can absolutely write a spec screenplay based on this. Just be aware that you have now narrowed your potential buyers to one.

**John:** Yup.

**Craig:** One.

**John:** One.

**Craig:** [laughs]

**John:** And so there is a track record of writers doing this. And so there was like a spec Wonder Woman feature that sold. It didn’t get produced but it sold and sort of that happened. Aliens vs. Predator, there was like a spec script that got purchased at a certain point. Jon Spaihts’s movie that became Prometheus had some kind of thing like that. It wasn’t really directly based on it but it was sort of got pulled in. I don’t know what the whole history of that was.

**Craig:** Yeah, I think that was one of those where he wrote a script and then they incorporated it into the, but this happens. I mean, look, Kelly Marcel wrote Saving Mr. Banks.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Only one possible buyer.

**John:** That’s absolutely true. And that turned out pretty well for everyone concerned.

**Craig:** On the other hand, all these people that we’re talking about are professional writers with track records who have sold things before, they have agents, you know. It’s not like they’re saying, “I have a script here that I can only sell to one person, but first I have to figure out how to get that person to call me back.”

**John:** Well, realistically, if you’re writing the script, you’re probably not writing to get that specific movie made. You’re getting that script written because it could be a good script to read. And so ultimately you’re reading this as essentially a writing sample. You have to really go into it thinking like it would be great if Warner Bros wanted to make this thing that they own and control, the S.W.A.T. movie or whatever. But realistically, you’re writing this because you want to have a great writing sample.

**Craig:** Okay. Well, if you’re writing it for a great writing sample, then that’s a different deal because then really what you have to do is write something that’s creatively ambitious, something that turns a familiar icon on its ear. If you just write sort of a faithful adaption of something then —

**John:** No one’s going to care.

**Craig:** Nobody’s going to care.

**John:** This is actually an interesting trend because in television for many years it’s been common place for writers to write a spec episode of an existing TV show. So I want to write a one hour drama so I’m going to write a one hour, an episode of The Good Wife.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** And that will be my writing sample.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** And so writing, doing that as a feature is sort of a more ambitious step, but there is potentially, you know, clutter-busting in the sense of like, did you read that incredibly insane version of The A-Team that that guy wrote?

**Craig:** Yeah. Like if somebody wrote The A-Team and it was just The A-Team on their day off —

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** And this weird drama between the characters just to sort of say, look how, you know, post-modern and interesting I am.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** I suppose, I mean, I remember years ago when I first started in Hollywood, there was a story of a guy that got a job on Northern Exposure because he wrote a Northern Exposure spec in iambic pentameter.

**John:** Great.

**Craig:** Which is like, okay, cool.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** I mean, it’s like all these interesting things. But that’s not — I don’t think what’s going on here.

**John:** No.

**Craig:** I think that Monsieur Robert from Texas is saying, “Look, I know a better way to write Wild Wild West as a movie, so I’m going to do it.”

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Well, basically, it’s not going to work. I don’t think…that does not sound like a good strategy to me.

**John:** Okay. Yeah.

**Craig:** Okay. Next we’ve got John Sherman The [TV Writer].

**John:** Mm-hmm.

**Craig:** That’s not John Sherman comma the [TV writer]. His name is John Sherman The [TV Writer].

**John:** There’s many John Shermans, so this is The [TV Writer], John Sherman.

**Craig:** This is The [TV Writer], John Sherman.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** John Sherman The [TV Writer] asks, “I was listening today about your contemplation of new t-shirt colors and, full disclosure, I’m a proud owner of one in rational blue. I’ve also suggested the color indebtedness red.” That’s not bad. I like that.

“This evening, I came across a tidbit aka titbit about Hanx Writer.

**John:** Hanx Writer.

**Craig:** Who’s Hanx Writer?

**John:** Tom Hanks has this iPad app that looks like a typewriter.

**Craig:** Really?

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Tom Hanks?

**John:** Tom Hanks, the Tom Hanks.

**Craig:** But it’s spelled Hanx.

**John:** I know, it’s crazy.

**Craig:** Hanx, and I pronounced it honks like, because to me —

**John:** [German accent] Hanx Writer.

**Craig:** Well, because it was like, you know, Hans Blix.

**John:** Mm-hmm, totally.

**Craig:** Yeah, it’s just like, it was like Hans Blix smashed together.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** “And then I started wondering, Craig, you love technology. John, you make technology. You are clearly both forward-thinking people even going so far as to openly questioning contemplate exploding the slave to pagination format of the screenplay itself. So why the typewriter? Don’t get wrong, I’m all for paying homage to the struggles of our forbearers, but that was for them. This is for us. Anyway, what I’m getting at is there are no better icon to represent us as writers today.”

What do you think, John?

**John:** Yeah, it’s interesting because like the new Scriptnotes t-shirt has still a typewriter on.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** It’s sort of exploding typewriter, but it’s still a typewriter. I guess when we were thinking about the logo for Scriptnotes, we wanted some sort of icon and it’s very hard to find an icon that feels like a screenwriter because any writer could be a pen, but like what is that pen doing? That pen could be writing anything.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** And so screenplays sort of came in a typewriter age. And so therefore —

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** We think about typewriters, but I’ve never typed a screenplay on a typewriter.

**Craig:** Yeah, it’s retro, bro.

**John:** It’s real retro.

**Craig:** Yeah, just chill out man, it’s retro. It’s cool.

**John:** Yeah, we’re typing a lot. He does point out that, “And more than the icon, I’m bothered by the use of the clickety-clacky typewriter sound that dominates the theme song for Showtime’s comedy series Episodes since the show is so much about present day writing and that sound is just an audio artifact. It is very much a needle scratch kind of thing.”

**Craig:** Right, it’s needle scratch.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Everybody still knows what needle scratch is.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** My daughter has never once played a record on a turntable. She knows what the needle scratch means.

**John:** I’m sure I’ve said this on the podcast before, but my daughter is reading Curious George. And I said, what is that thing that Curious George is spinning on? She’s like, “I don’t know.” It’s a record player. Yeah.

**Craig:** Oh, I thought it was a pottery wheel.

**John:** Yeah. I watched Ghost this week also.

**Craig:** Oh, Ghost.

**John:** Have you seen Ghost lately?

**Craig:** Yeah, it’s great.

**John:** Yeah, it’s great. It’s so different than you think. Whoopi Goldberg just like in Aladdin how Robin Williams shows up 40 minutes in.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** She shows up super late in the movie, but then she’s incredibly important in the movie.

**Craig:** Got an Oscar.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Maybe we should do that one.

**John:** Let’s do that one. I’m happy to do that one.

**Craig:** I mean Ghost is like — I mean Bruce Joel Rubin, woo, the Ghost and Jacob’s Ladder.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** How about those two? Totally different movies. Both brilliant.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** All right.

**John:** Right.

**Craig:** Put that one on the list.

**John:** Maisha in Toronto writes, “I’m an aspiring writer with absolutely no money. No exaggeration, I just withdrew the whole $2.25 from my checking account and the bus home is $3 and I’m at the Apple store right now waiting for my mom to pick me up.”

**Craig:** This is awesome.

**John:** “Worst, my computer is completely broken. I want to know if it’s theoretically possible to write with Fountain on your iPhone. My idea was to buy an Apple keyboard and download the Fountain app, but I want to know which program would you suggest writing in first.”

It’s Highland.

“Using a little iPhone, the keyboard might look really silly, but if it’s possible to do it, I will. Any suggestions on how to use Fountain with the iPhone or what programs to write in would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.”

So did your page just get broken?

**Craig:** No, no, no, I just feel so bad for Mysha.

**John:** Yeah. So Maisha is broke. So what’s interesting is that people get broke. And because you’re broke, I think we have this image of like a starving artist. And an artist is just like a painter who’s like, you know, giving money to draw paints, or it’s like drawing or busking. That’s all sort of romantic, but we think after this typewriter and computer discussion, we think that, well, you have to typewriter and a computer to be a screenwriter. It’s like, no, you really don’t. You have to have a piece of paper and a pen and some place where you can type up the things you’ve written.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** I think if you want to type on your phone, you can do that. Apparently, Fifty Shades of Grey was written on a Blackberry.

**Craig:** Yeah, I believe that.

**John:** Yeah. So you can write in any medium you want to write in. So you can handwrite these things. You can type these things. You could type in notes on your phone if you had to.

**Craig:** She wrote the novel, Fifty Shades of Grey in a Blackberry?

**John:** I think that’s true. Kelly Marcel will be able to tell us.

**Craig:** That’s hysterical. [laughs]

**John:** I think it’s amazing. I think it’s just wonderful. I think it’s an indication of where we are in this time because like it feels like..it feels so right.

**Craig:** I’m done. I’m done. I want to be flung off the planet. I want —

**John:** [laughs]

**Craig:** I don’t want —

**John:** Turn up the speed, Craig. We’re ready to go.

**Craig:** Centrifugal force no longer applies to me. I’m good.

**John:** Right.

**Craig:** I’m good. I could fire down space. You know, Maisha is Canadian.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** She’s in Toronto. First of all, I didn’t know that Canada let people get this poor, but okay. One thought I had was this: even here in antisocialist United States, we have public libraries that have computers connected to the Internet. If you have public libraries there in Toronto with computers connected to the Internet that you are allowed to use for a span of time, WriterDuet is a free program, I mean at least the, you know, the limited version of it is free. It saves your stuff on the cloud and it’s a fully functioning screenplay formatter. And then when it’s all done, it exports out to, you know, all the classic formats.

So that could be something. Just go to a place with a public computer and just do your script in WriterDuet. You just log in and out, so nobody can read your stuff. That would work. And then you don’t have to buy a keyboard. I mean, like if you have and you’re saying, you have negative 75 cents.

**John:** Yes.

**Craig:** You’re so poor, you can’t afford to have nothing.

**John:** [laughs]

**Craig:** You can’t afford free things.

**John:** Yes.

**Craig:** Because you have negative 75 cents. So don’t buy anything. Don’t buy an Apple keyboard because you don’t have — you have negative 75 cents.

**John:** Yeah, don’t buy that keyboard. I will say specifically like you have an iPhone and like it’s hard to imagine sort of life without an iPhone, so I would say keep your iPhone. WriterDuet is a possibility. I think Google Docs might be a more —

**Craig:** Yeah, sure.

**John:** More immediate possibility because you’re going to be able to access that on your phone as well as on a public computer and sort of all your stuff can sort of be there in the cloud and it’s essentially going to be free. You can write in Fountain, on anything that can like generate letters, you can write in Fountain on.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** So you can write that in Google Docs.

**Craig:** I feel like it’s so hard to write on a small factor device.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** It just, it’s just hard, you know. There is something about the thumbs of it all and not doing a proper keyboard, it’s just —

**John:** The other thing I would say is people have this sense that I have to buy something in order to do something or I have to, you know, I have to have all this gear, this accoutrement. The same thing when people have a baby, they always think like, oh, I need to go Babies R Us and buy all these things.

**Craig:** First baby.

**John:** First baby. First baby, they think that.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** And the second baby, they don’t think that.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** And second baby, you realize like, god, just borrow stuff from other people who already have stuff. And so someone in your life Mysha probably has a keyboard you can use or honestly just like a crappy old computer you can use because you don’t need any kind of good computer to be able to write the screenplay.

**Craig:** The crap we bought when my son was born and then when my daughter was born we were like —

**John:** Did you have heated baby wipes? That’s the indulgence.

**Craig:** I actually put my foot down on that one. I was like, no. No heated baby wipes. We didn’t have that. But we did have like all these fancy like crib bumpers and like 14 different mobiles. In the end, you don’t need any of that stuff, you know.

**John:** You don’t.

**Craig:** All of the warm, the lights and the things and the baloney.

**John:** It’s all baloney.

**Craig:** Baloney. You know what kids like? Whatever is within their hand’s reach and then they shove it in their mouth.

**John:** That’s great. A block, they love that.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** A good wooden block.

**Craig:** Wooden block.

**John:** The only thing that I’ve always constantly been told is like, oh, you can’t get that second hand is a car seat.

**Craig:** I know.

**John:** But I’m not sure I entirely totally believe that either because like last year’s car seat was —

**Craig:** I know because, technically you’re like, “You don’t know if it was compromised in a crash.” Like, I kind of do know.

**John:** I kind of do know.

**Craig:** And I mean I bought a new, well, the other thing was that between the time my son was born and my daughter was born, they had kind of perfected that latch system.

**John:** Yeah, the latch systems are so much better.

**Craig:** So I had to get a new one anyway just because the latch system is great. I mean, putting in that first car seat was —

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** I mean —

**John:** It’s such a horrible like sitcom cliché, but it’s actually incredibly hard.

**Craig:** It’s hard.

**John:** And you’re always scraping your fingers and doing just awful things.

**Craig:** The seat is designed… — Now, that I’m telling you, somebody comes along and does like a proper design of a car seat.

**John:** Like the Nest people, the Nest people do a proper car seat.

**Craig:** Yes, they will make a ton of money because car seats are the — everybody with a kid must have one and they are crap. They’re crap, all of them.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** They’re ugly and they’ve got scrappy bits and then the prices.

**John:** I know it’s expensive. The one other bit of car seat advice I’ll give because this is really a podcast about car seats —

**Craig:** Yeah, car seats and —

**John:** And child safety.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** If you’re traveling some place with a kid who’s still in a car seat, you get this roller thing that attaches to the car seat and so you can push the kid through the airport. So they basically can sit in their own thing —

**Craig:** Yeah, we had that thing.

**John:** It’s a wheely thing. It’s just —

**Craig:** Yeah, that thing is pretty cool.

**John:** The best.

**Craig:** But, you know, I don’t have to worry about that now because my kids walk.

**John:** Ah, you’ve got walking children.

**Craig:** Both of my kids have braces.

**John:** Yeah. That’s nice, well done.

**Craig:** How about that?

**John:** You’re bragging there.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Because I can afford braces.

**John:** “I have braces for both of my kids.”

**Craig:** Both of my kids have braces.

**John:** They don’t have to share. They each have their own braces.

**Craig:** But no, I’m saying that’s how old my kids are now. They’re both braces age.

**John:** Yeah. Oh.

**Craig:** Sick. Okay, let’s see. Last but not least, we’ve got Chris from LA writing, “I have a couple of related questions I was wondering if you guys could help me with.” We will see.

“I have a script that is being optioned by a producer with a director attached that everyone seems to agree has good commercial potential if done right. Since this is all happening this week, there is no financing yet. But we are looking to shoot it in the $500,000 to $1 million range. Since I don’t have an agent, lawyer or manager…” And I’m already getting nervous…

“It’s up to me to determine the conditions of my deal with them.” [laughs] I’m sorry, I’m not laughing at you, although, technically, I’m in fact laughing at you.

“So here are my questions. One, is it appropriate for a screenwriter to ask for a producing credit if they’re going to be heavily involved in development and production? If so, is there a certain credit that’s most appropriate. I want to stay involved in production for all the reasons you would think.”

Let’s see. “Producing credits, I’ve been told, can be pretty arbitrary and I don’t expect full credit as producer, but would asking for a co-producer or associate producer would be acceptable or is that taboo if you’re already the credited writer? What percentage of backend is appropriate to ask for? Since this is a low-budget project, I think it’s smarter to take a minimum fee upfront — I’m not entirely sure what that is in a project this size — and have some stake in the finished product.”

This question is a bit like, look, I’m not a doctor, but I’ve opened myself up.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Now, can I take out my spleen? Do I need the spleen? Do I clamp the spleen off? Also, there is blood pooling. Do I sup up the blood? Or is it good that it’s pooling? What do you think?

**John:** So what I think, Craig, is that the phrase to underline here is $500,000 to $1 million range. And that’s a smaller movie than you or I have actually ever made. And so —

**Craig:** I made one that was that small.

**John:** You made one that small?

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** Okay. So at that level, it’s not unheard of that this person doesn’t have a writer’s agent or a manager. This person should have a lawyer to go through these things.

**Craig:** Yes.

**John:** And the lawyer, and you’re going to pay a lawyer to go through this thing and sort of — and you want the lawyer who does this deal all the time because this is a very specific kind of movie you’re making. And the person that you hire, she will know what is sort of typical, what’s possible and will make sure that everything gets done, the to the degree it needs to get done.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** So I can answer some of your questions. Yes, it’s appropriate to get a producer credit if you’re going to be involved in the production of the movie. On Go, I was as a co-producer. Co-producer, associate producer, that’s good and fine. You could be a producer-producer if you’re actually producing the movie.

**Craig:** I would avoid associate producer because on films that really —

**John:** It really means post, I think. I think it means post production. What do you think it means?

**Craig:** Oh to me, it means sort of the producer’s main assistant.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** So associate producer is not a great credit for you as the screenwriter.

**John:** I would agree.

**Craig:** Yeah. No, you can ask for producing credits of course. And then in terms of backend versus upfront fees, that is a very complicated situation. Backend just doesn’t mean anything.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** It’s all about the definition of backend.

**John:** So classically, the tiny movie that actually had a backend that was meaningful is The Blair Witch Project.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** And the people who were, you know, the actors who were involved with that backend on that did tremendously well because of this. It was actually genuinely a profitable movie. Your movie will not be profitable, almost no chance that your movie will classically turn a profit, but that’s okay.

**Craig:** Right. That’s not what it’s about.

**John:** That’s okay. The goal is that you’re going to be able to make a movie. So Chris and this question is probably a month old, so maybe well past this point.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** But you need to find a lawyer who does this kind of thing a lot.

**Craig:** Absolutely.

**John:** And so what I might look for is if you’re going through the trades and you’re looking for little tiny movies that sold places, look for who negotiated those deals. That might be a person and when you call or email that person just like, hey, I have a movie being set up with this production company that’s a known production company. I really need someone to figure out my deal for me.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** That’s how you approach that.

**Craig:** The other way to go is to talk to your director and say, “Hey listen, I need a lawyer to do my stuff. Is there somebody at your lawyer’s firm who would take me on?” You must have a lawyer to do this. You cannot do this on your own. It’s foolishness.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** True foolishness.

**John:** I mean don’t spend more money that you’re going to make on the movie for your lawyer. Clearly, you have to set some limits there.

**Craig:** You won’t need to. It’s not rocket science. It will take them two or three hours. And you should not have a principal at the firm. Get a fairly young lawyer who understands basically what the deal is and maybe you’ll end up spending $1,000 or something.

**John:** Yeah. And the reason why they hopefully will want to make your deal is because they want you as a client from this point forward.

**Craig:** Right, exactly. That’s how it works.

**John:** The other thing I’ll say is that movies of this scale, you don’t think of them as being WGA movies, but they totally can be WGA movies.

**Craig:** Yes.

**John:** And so another place that you should take a look at is the Indie deal that the WGA has.

**Craig:** The low budget agreement.

**John:** And so the low budget agreement should be able to cover this kind of movie.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** And with this kind of movie, there may be options which they don’t pay your money upfront. They could pay your money in the backend. But they can give you credit protections. They can give you things like potentially residuals or health for this project which would otherwise seem impossible.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** So definitely worth looking at whether this movie can be done under the low budget agreement.

**Craig:** Agreed. Agreed. Agreed.

**John:** Cool. It is time for One Cool Things.

Mine this week is a website that I fell into a great click hole for this last week. Every Insanely Mystifying Paradox in Physics: A Complete List.

**Craig:** Oh, neat.

**John:** And so basically it’s just a webpage that has a link to all the Wikipedia articles about the crazy sort of paradoxes. And so we talked about Fermi’s Paradox on the show before which is why we don’t see evidence of alien cultures when they should be out there, but they’re not.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** There should be clearly tremendous number of alien cultures, but we don’t see them. So there’s reasons why we may not be seeing them. But the other paradox is a lot of them involve time travel, so obviously it’s sort of the father paradox, the grandfather paradox, the twins paradox.

But some of them are, and Schrödinger’s cat. But some of them are like actually just completely new to me. And so —

**Craig:** Give me a new one.

**John:** What was one of the most recent new ones? Bell’s theorem which is a quantum physics, quantum physics violates other things that, you know, sort of —

**Craig:** Yeah, I love it.

**John:** Yeah. And so it is really challenging in the sense that a lot of these also involve sort of time zero in the sense that all of our equations, they should be able to work the other way around. And yet some of them can’t work the other way around. And so what is it and so why do we always perceive time as moving forward when it really could move the other way as well? Second law of thermodynamics should, you know, indicate the direction time zero, yet things go crazy.

**Craig:** It’s so sick. The universe is so sick.

**John:** Well, it’s also, we may fundamentally be asking the wrong questions. We have this perception —

**Craig:** We don’t get it.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** We just don’t get it. We know we can’t see it.

**John:** We don’t, we’re smart enough to realize like, oh the sun is in the center of the universe, and yet there may be some fundamental things that we’re just like not getting and we may not really have the mental capacity to figure them out.

**Craig:** Well, my favorite one is the whole this is a hologram.

**John:** Yeah, and how do you prove it?

**Craig:** We are essentially a computer simulation. I believe that.

**John:** My daughter who’s nine, she’s going to bed, and she’s like, “Papa, I really think that maybe this is all like a computer game and that we’re all just living in it and that we’re not real.”

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** And I’m like, well, good night.

**Craig:** There you go. That’s right.

**John:** That’s right.

**Craig:** That’s right.

**John:** That’s right. Click.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** But the game has rules.

**John:** The game seems to have rules.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** Yeah. But I mean sometimes the rules seem to be violated. And that that’s what this website is about, so these sort of questions like, oh yes, but these things don’t quite make sense.

**Craig:** If we were a computer program and let’s say things got upgraded, we would never know.

**John:** No.

**Craig:** And it would happen in the blink of an eye.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** We would literally never know that the color, like I look at this table in front of us and it’s yellow.

**John:** Mm-hmm.

**Craig:** But yesterday, it could have appeared a totally different way to me. I may not have even existed yesterday.

**John:** No.

**Craig:** All my memories, all of them. Wow.

**John:** Yeah, so there’s another thing that sort of propagated through a couple of months ago which is arguing that rationally we probably are a computer simulation. And the computers are simulating us in order to sort of perfect their own programming. And so that we’re basically constantly being wiped and sort of restarted so that the computer intelligence can become more intelligent.

**Craig:** I’m okay with that. It’s fine.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** It’s better than…I’m just glad that we’re living in this stage of the software as opposed to like the Middle Ages.

**John:** Mm-hmm. Well, if the Middle Ages happened, Craig?

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** We have no idea the Middle Ages happened.

**Craig:** Correct. Obviously, it couldn’t have happened. That’s just ridiculous.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Well, my One Cool Things are so much more mundane, which is, this is a great contrast this week. So John, are you a big shaver? You’re not as much of a shaver —

**John:** I don’t grow a big beard.

**Craig:** You don’t grow a big beard. So, I have my Mediterranean blood and I grow a big beard, but I shave it. I don’t like having a beard. It gets super itchy.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** So I shave, but I hate shaving. It’s annoying. The worst way to shave your face is with an electric razor. That’s just dumb. I don’t understand people who use electric razors. They hate themselves and the way they look as far I’m concerned.

**John:** [laughs]

**Craig:** That should be like Gillette’s shaver. They’re motto should be, “You hate yourself and the way you look.” Okay. But Gillette makes very good razors, like proper razors. And so, there’s the thing like they keep adding razors. Soon there will be like 20 razors.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** And every time they come up with some big new thing, I’m like, shut up. And then I use it. And it’s like, oh it’s better. So this new one, the Gillette FlexBall, it’s so dumb because it’s just basically —

**John:** Oh yeah, I’ve seen the ads for it.

**Craig:** It rocks back and forth.

**John:** It’s like the Dyson Vacuum cleaner.

**Craig:** Correct. So they put it on little pivot head. And it doesn’t pivot in all directions. It only pivots left and right. But then the head will pivot up and down. So effectively, it’s pivoting in a certain rotational range. It’s better.

**John:** I’m sorry.

**Craig:** No, it’s better. You know, I used to get cut under my chin every time.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Now I don’t. So Gillette FlexBall razor is a very good product. Along with that, is a very cheap product and one of the greatest things available to any man and woman.

**John:** Right.

**Craig:** Because women shave their legs and armpits and so forth. And so forth.

**John:** And so forth.

**Craig:** A styptic pencil.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Everyone, every adult should own a styptic pencil. I don’t know what’s in styptic pencils. I know that I have one that I’ve had — I think I got it in college. It’s like a stalagmite.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** I think I paid $0.89 for it. So the styptic pencil business to me is the worst possible business because you make a product, you sell it for a dollar.

**John:** And no one ever needs it again.

**Craig:** And no one ever buys it again.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** But it essentially cauterizes any small cuts on your body within seconds. And it’s so useful.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** You’re running at the door and you’ve got 14 —

**John:** There’s the toilet paper stuck to your face.

**Craig:** Well, I don’t even do the toilet paper.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** I just take out my old crusty like —

**John:** Dab yourself with it.

**Craig:** I mean I just dab, dab, dab. And you feel it burn. And the burn is wonderful and then you’re good to go.

**John:** I’m looking up what is a styptic pencil made of because I want to know what the elemental —

**Craig:** I mean it seems like it’s some sort of salt. It’s like a crusty salt.

**John:** Yeah, what they are and how to use them. So it’s any short medicated stick generally made of a powdered crystal from an alum block. So it’s alum, so like pickling. You’re pickling your face.

**Craig:** That’s right.

**John:** Yeah, that’s fair.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** It’s a reasonable choice.

**Craig:** Face pickling.

**John:** Now, do you have to shave with shaving cream or can you just wet, dry, wet, whatever?

**Craig:** No, I shave with shaving cream.

**John:** Yeah, see I don’t even need to do that.

**Craig:** Wow.

**John:** I can literally just like, I can be in the shower and like [slip, slip, slip], I’m done.

**Craig:** You shave like the way I shaved when I was 12.

**John:** Yeah, exactly.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Oh, here’s a hair. But I can see, you have like a little mustache.

**John:** Well, that’s three days of me not shaving.

**Craig:** Are you kidding me?

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** I hate you.

**John:** Yeah. I can’t grow a beard though, so —

**Craig:** This right here is 50 minutes of me not shaving. Yeah, I shaved 50 minutes ago.

**John:** That’s our whole show this week. This is quick and easy.

**Craig:** I mean that was fun.

**John:** Yeah. Scriptnotes is produced by Stuart Friedel.

**Craig:** Boo.

**John:** It’s edited by Matthew Chilelli.

**Craig:** Yahoo!

**John:** If you have a question for Craig or me, you can write to ask@johnaugust.com. Little short questions are great on Twitter.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** Craig is @clmazin and I’m @johnaugust. If you would like a Scriptnotes t-shirt, you should go to store.johnaugust.com and see the t-shirt designs there. It’s a Sons of Anarchy thing that Craig seems to like and I like a lot too. You only have until September 30th, so don’t dally on those.

If you would like to join us for the Slate Live Culture Gabfest, you should come. And that is happening in Los Angeles. It’s downtown. And you can find the date and all the details if you click through the show notes here. That would be fun.

And finally, if you would like to have a dirty episode of Scriptnotes, you should become a premium subscriber. You can go to scriptnotes.net and that is where you can log in, and it’s $1.99 a month, you get all the back episodes.

You can find us on iTunes. Just search for Scriptnotes. While you’re there, subscribe and you can leave us a comment. We love to read your comments.

**Craig:** How are those comments going by the way?

**John:** They’re going well. You know what, we have a little time. Let’s pull up some iTunes here and see what people have written. Cory Orion wrote, “Fantastic. Five stars. The podcast is the best. Best investment of my time. Best investment of my money in their subscription app.”

**Craig:** Well, this guy obviously loves it.

**John:** This guy loves it. So we talked about sort of if we hit a thousand premium subscribers —

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** We’re going to do the dirty show.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** And that so far, we’re rocketing up.

**Craig:** Oh really?

**John:** So I think we’re going to have to do the dirty show pretty quick.

**Craig:** People love dirtiness so much that they’re now — now, they — we knew this.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** We knew this would happen.

**John:** So if you would like to become a premium subscriber, you’ll get some occasional bonus episodes including one from last week. So the bonus episode from last week is the overtime stuff from the Aline show.

**Craig:** Oh, it was pretty funny.

**John:** It was pretty good.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** Yeah. I listened to that.

**Craig:** Drunken chit chat.

**John:** Yeah. Drunken chitchat about all sort of things. Spanx.

**Craig:** Spanx.

**John:** And D&D.

**Craig:** And people are like cancel subscription.

**John:** Cancel subscription.

**Craig:** Cancel and cancel and cancel. Spanx and D&D. Oh, those go together.

**John:** But the premium subscribers get all the back episodes, back to episode one which is fun. So you can hear it back when we didn’t know what we were doing.

**Craig:** Right, according to Aline we didn’t know what we were doing

**John:** We had no idea what we were doing.

**Craig:** Right. The boss of the podcast.

**John:** Oh lord.

**Craig:** What’s with her?

**John:** What’s with her? Hi Aline, we love you. You scare us.

**Craig:** Yeah. Dude, now you say this. Now you talk. Hey.

**John:** Hey.

**Craig:** Hey.

**John:** Hey.

**Craig:** Hey. We know what we’re doing.

**John:** Other bonus things, like we’ll have this interview Simon Kinberg coming up. So there’s other stuff on there.

Dan Jammon writes about episode 153, “Long time listener. As if I didn’t love you enough, your Björk digression from this particular episode had my howling in the gym with delight. Such a pleasure to hear you both share your thoughts and your mutually exquisite taste confirmed yet again. This time in a manner very close to this listener’s heart. To prove I listened, I decided to share this comment with you on iTunes as mojo rather than tagging you both on Twitter. Much love to both of you from the Windy City.

**Craig:** What did we say about Björk?

**John:** I don’t remember.

**Craig:** Human behavior.

**John:** Yeah, [hums].

**Craig:** Yeah. She’s very strange. [hums] It’s probably what we did last time.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** [humming] God, I love that video. And it was like a big, it was a big bear. Wasn’t the bear eating somebody? Eh, we already did this digression.

**John:** “Craig Mazin is super cool, but I find John August really intimidating, like a high school principal. That said, it’s great to hear two working writers tell war stories in such an intelligent, informative, and passionate way. There is no show that comes close to these guys. I learn something every time I listen.”

**Craig:** [laughs] A high school principal.

**John:** Oh no, that’s fine. Someone’s got to make sure the school runs properly.

**Craig:** That’s right. I appreciate your comment. It will be filed. Please, now, back to class.

**John:** Yes.

**Craig:** Back to class. Principals are always telling you to go back to class.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** You are a little bit like, I can see that. You would be an excellent high school principal.

**John:** I’d be an excellent high school principal.

**Craig:** I would be the worst high school principal.

**John:** I think you’d be really good. I think —

**Craig:** Oh really? I think I would be dragged in front of the school board on a weekly basis. “Did you say this?” Yes.

**John:** Yes.

**Craig:** Yes. “You called this kid an idiot?” He was. He’s an idiot.

**John:** I mean school counselors can call a kid an idiot, cant they?

**Craig:** I don’t think they’re allowed. I don’t think you’re allowed to call a kid an idiot.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Particularly the school counselors. Now we know you’d make the worst school counselor ever. You think your job is to belittle them. They come in and they’re like,” I’m being bullied and picked on.” Well, it’s because you’re an idiot.

**John:** You can say that you made an idiotic choice.

**Craig:** Yes. [laughs] But still that’s the worst job of being school counselor ever. So —

**John:** You made an idiotic choice.

**Craig:** And then you just look at them.

**John:** To throw that rock at the child.

**Craig:** You look at them totally calmly with sort of dead eyes. “Well, you’ve made an idiotic choice.” “Wah-wah, I want to transfer.”

**John:** Yeah, I’m now like Gotham villain. I’m the principal.

**Craig:** The principal. Yeah, exactly. Yeah, that’s right. You’re the principal. You’re Batman’s newest foe.

**John:** Craig, thank you very much for a fun podcast.

**Craig:** Thank you, John.

**John:** Bye.

Links:

* New shirts are [available for pre-order now through September 30th in the John August Store](http://store.johnaugust.com/)
* [Applause](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Applause_(musical)), the All About Eve musical, on Wikipedia
* [Get tickets now](http://www.slate.com/live/la-culturefest.html) for October 8th’s live Slate Culture Gabfest with guests John and Craig
* [Fountain](http://fountain.io/) is a plain text markup language for screenwriting
* [WriterDuet](https://www.writerduet.com/)
* WGA [Low Budget Agreement](http://www.wga.org/uploadedFiles/writers_resources/LBAhandout.pdf)
* [Every Insanely Mystifying Paradox in Physics: A Complete List](http://sprott.physics.wisc.edu/pickover/physics-paradoxes.html)
* [Gillette Fusion ProGlide with FlexBall](http://gillette.com/en-us/products/razor-blades/fusion-proglide-flexball-razors/fusion-proglide-manual-razor-with-flexball)
* Styptic pencils on [Amazon](http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00E5QJC04/?tag=johnaugustcom-20) and [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antihemorrhagic)
* Leave us a comment [on iTunes](https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/scriptnotes-podcast/id462495496?mt=2)
* Get premium Scriptnotes access at [scriptnotes.net](http://scriptnotes.net/) and hear our 1,000th subscriber special
* [Outro](http://johnaugust.com/2013/scriptnotes-the-outros) by Scriptnotes listener Rajesh Naroth ([send us yours!](http://johnaugust.com/2014/outros-needed))

Scriptnotes, Ep 160: A Screenwriter’s Guide to the End of the World — Transcript

September 4, 2014 Scriptnotes Transcript

The original post for this episode can be found [here](http://johnaugust.com/2014/a-screenwriters-guide-to-the-end-of-the-world).

**John August:** Hello and welcome. My name is John August.

**Craig Mazin:** My name is Craig Mazin.

**John:** And this is episode 160 of Scriptnotes, a podcast about screenwriting and things that are interesting to screenwriters.

Craig, you and I are both writing scripts. We’re both in our first drafts. I just crossed page 60. Where are you at?

**Craig:** Oh, well, see, you’re lapping me because this is really where the difference in our processes is driven home.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Because you like to go kind of get a fast draft out and then you go back, whereas I am painstakingly whistling this thing. So I am currently on page 41, I believe but feeling —

**John:** Okay.

**Craig:** Feeling very good about it, feeling very good.

**John:** Yeah, it’s important to have a good 40 pages.

**Craig:** Yes, yes, I’m —

**John:** That’s nice.

**Craig:** Happy with the 40.

**John:** Today on the podcast, we are going to be talking about the end of the world, which is one of my favorite topics of all things to discuss. But before we get to that, we have some housekeeping to take care of.

First off, Craig and I were both on the nominating committee for the WGA board and we were the people who interviewed people who wanted to be on the WGA board and sort of asked them why they wanted to be on the board. And it was four nights of fun and hilarity.

**Craig:** [laughs] Yes, yes, high —

**John:** At the WGA headquarters.

**Craig:** High stakes fun and hilarity.

**John:** So on previous podcasts, you and I have endorsed candidates. We said like, well, these are some people who are running and these are people who we think are fantastic and you should vote for.

**Craig:** Yes.

**John:** But this year we cannot do that.

**Craig:** No.

**John:** Specifically because we are on a committee, we are not supposed to endorse anybody. So the only thing we can endorse is that you should absolutely vote for the candidates of your choice. If you are a WGA member, you have received a packet in the mail that has all the candidate statements along with statements from people who are endorsing those candidates. You will not see me or Craig’s name on any of those endorsements, but we definitely think you should vote for people because it’s an important election. It’s always kind of an important election. There’s always stuff to get done.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** You should read those candidate statements and really think about who you want to be representing you. And you actually have an opportunity, if you’re listening to this podcast on Tuesday, tomorrow, Wednesday, there is a Candidates’ Night at the WGA, so you can go and listen to them speak and ask them questions.

**Craig:** Yes. You can listen to them and point your finger at them and boo and cheer. It’s like a zoo. It’s great.

**John:** Yeah. You know, weirdly, like a lot of people bring fruit to it. I don’t know that’s a good idea but —

**Craig:** Rotten vegetables, yeah. Why did people throw rotten vegetables? First of all, the forethought like, okay, we’re going to go out to the theater tonight in 1920 and we paid, you know, paid money for this but we’re expecting that at least one or two of the acts will be so bad we’ll want to hit them with stuff. So who’s going to bring, but we’re poor and vegetables are kind of hard to come by in the Lower East Side, so whose got just rotting cabbage?

**John:** Well, I think rotting cabbage isn’t that hard to find. If there is cabbage that doesn’t get consumed or cabbage that you could pull out of the ground and the maggots have already gotten to it —

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** That’s the kind of thing you bring to the theater.

**Craig:** Do maggots eat cabbage though?

**John:** No, they really don’t.

**Craig:** No.

**John:** It’s some sort of like — there’s probably a cabbage worm.

**Craig:** Oh, like a fungus rot?

**John:** Yeah, that too, yeah.

**Craig:** So you just gather it up and then you’re like, “Oh yeah, where are you going? I’m going to the theater that’s why I have this bag of just stinking refuse.”

**John:** Yeah, because, you know, I’m broke and poor but I’m going to pay for a ticket to see —

**Craig:** Well, I still love the arts, yeah. [laughs]

**John:** I still love the arts.

**Craig:** But I —

**John:** I mean, you have to support the arts.

**Craig:** But I also hate the arts so much that if somebody just doesn’t make me happy, I’m going to [laughs] hit them with stuff.

**John:** Mm-hmm.

**Craig:** It never really happened. I think that was just made up in the movies, right? I mean, nobody ever did that for real.

**John:** I’m sure people threw garbage at, like, candidates they didn’t like or like political figures they didn’t like.

**Craig:** So great.

**John:** But I don’t know. I mean, The Gong Show was an extrapolation of that idea but —

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** The Gong Show was just a unique cultural moment that never needs to be repeated.

**Craig:** Oh, I don’t know. I mean we’re trying, right, because America’s Got Talent, they have their little “Eh” and there’s an X or something like that which is really just a gong..

**John:** Yeah, that’s true.

**Craig:** But The Gong Show was great because there was an enormous amount of power in any particular judge. Anyone hitting the gong, that’s it, right, you’re done.

**John:** Mm-hmm. Yeah.

**Craig:** So if Jaye P. Morgan’s not into you, it’s over.

**John:** Yeah. Yeah, the old game shows were different and in some ways better. I mean Kitty Carlisle could just postulate about sort of what someone’s profession was. I’m guessing it’s Kitty Carlisle. I’m sort of making that name up but, to tell the truth.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** And that was kind of a fascinating show because like who are these people, the people on Password, like we don’t have kind of that level of celebrity anymore.

**Craig:** No, I know. There was all this wonderful sort of, where a celebrity became a professional game show person.

**John:** Yeah, Paul Lynde.

**Craig:** Paul Lynde or Charles Nelson Reilly, I mean they were just kind of… — Or who’s the woman on Match Game who really was just famous for being on Match Game. I don’t even know what she was famous for.

**John:** Is she the one that Kristen Wiig is sort of impersonating or like —

**Craig:** No, no, she’s, you know, I wish that [TS Fall] were here. He would know.

**John:** TS would know something.

**Craig:** TS would know. Yeah, you know, the old game shows were great. I don’t know, these new things, they’re. I don’t know. I really, oh, you know, it’s funny, The Gong Show, Rex Reed was on The Gong Show a lot. That was before he became an enormous asshole.

**John:** Yes.

**Craig:** Yeah. An enormous drunken asshole.

**John:** Yeah, it was certainly good training.

**Craig:** In my opinion, in my opinion. [laughs]

**John:** [laughs]

**Craig:** I don’t really know if he is. That’s just my feeling.

**John:** Yes. It’s also possible that everything was just better back then because it was our youth and everything seemed better —

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** If we actually were to look and compare it on The Game Show Network, we’d say, oh you know what, it was actually kind of terrible. You know, another thing that was better in our youth was Scriptnotes t-shirts. And so we used to make Scriptnotes t-shirts and we sold them to people who liked them and it was nice. And so our first batch of Scriptnotes t-shirts were the Umbrage Orange and Rational Blue.

And we sold a whole bunch of them and people really liked them. And we also did a batch of black. But that was about eight months ago. And so my open question to you, Craig, but really to the audience is, should we make more t-shirts? And so if you would like to have more t-shirts, on johnaugust.com, the same place where you may be listening to this podcast, there’s just going to be a poll saying like, hey, should we make more t-shirts. And if we should make t-shirts, what color should they be because we’re happy to do them if people actually want them.

But we won’t do them if people don’t want them. So that is a question I am positing to the readers. You can also chime in on Twitter if you would like but we are considering making t-shirts in time for, possibly Austin, but more likely for the holiday season. So if you would like a t-shirt, that is something you can weigh in on.

**Craig:** Is Jaye P. Morgan still alive, do you think?

**John:** I think of JP Morgan being the banker. Is that a different person we’re talking about?

**Craig:** Well, it’s Jaye, J-A-Y-E P. Morgan.

**John:** Oh.

**Craig:** So she was a —

**John:** It’s a she?

**Craig:** Oh yeah, Jaye P. Morgan. Oh my god.

**John:** Well, I’m Googling this right now because this is —

**Craig:** Jaye P. Morgan.

**John:** Fascinating information.

**Craig:** Yeah. No, see, Jaye P. Morgan is still alive. She’s 82 years old. She lives apparently, oh no, she was born in your home state of Colorado.

**John:** Yes.

**Craig:** And she was like a singer and an entertainer. You know, back in the day, you could be an entertainer. That was your job.

**John:** Well, looking at the Google Images, she’s having a conversation with Kermit the Frog which seems like exactly the kind of thing an entertainer would do.

**Craig:** Absolutely. So Jaye P. Morgan is still alive. If you guys out there say, yeah, we should go ahead and make some t-shirts, we’re sending a free t-shirt to Jaye P. Morgan.

**John:** Well, that was never even a question.

**Craig:** She made me so happy.

**John:** Aw.

**Craig:** She did.

**John:** Yeah, anybody who makes Craig happy rather than angry —

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** Deserves a t-shirt.

**Craig:** Deserves a t-shirt.

**John:** A place where people could wear their t-shirts if they wanted to is the Slate Culture Gabfest. We can actually announce what this thing is now. So on October 8th at 7:30 PM in Downtown Los Angeles, we are going to be joining our friends Julia Turner, Stephen Metcalf and Dana Stevens from Slate for the Slate Culture Gabfest.

And so it’s a fantastic podcast. It should be a fantastic night. Tickets are on sale now. So it’s actually their event. We are just going to be guests, which I’m so excited not to have to host something.

**Craig:** Yeah, we just show up and we’re brilliant, huh? Is that the idea?

**John:** Yeah, that’s the goal. So we’ve back and forthed about what our topics are going to be. I think it’s going to be fun. A chance to talk about what it’s like to be creators of content versus critics of content and consumers of content. So I’m excited to have this chance to be on stage with them.

**Craig:** Yeah. For those of you who might be thinking, ah, I’m on the fence, should I go or not, let me just underline for you: I’m going to be on stage with a film critic.

**John:** That’s true. Fireworks are promised. And the whole thing is sponsored by Acura, which is just kind of great and odd but wonderful.

**Craig:** Acura. Oh, that’s right —

**John:** Yeah, we never have sponsors on our show, [laughs] so it sort of feels — it feels fun to sort of say like, brought to you by Acura.

**Craig:** [laughs] We’re such namby pambies.

**John:** [laughs]

**Craig:** That the only time we’re ever sponsored by anybody, it’s a charity. We never make any money for any, like we’re so… — It’s funny because it’s not like you and I are particularly anti-corporate or anything like that.

**John:** No.

**Craig:** We’ve just kept this whole thing very, very pure. And it’s so odd, yeah, that Slate, liberal Slate, will be sponsored by Acura this evening. The Japanese Daibutsu.

**John:** Julia actually emailed like she’s like, “I know you guys don’t like to take sponsorships, is it going to be a problem?” Like, eh, like it’s no problem.

**Craig:** It’s your show, so.

**John:** It’s your show. We’re happy to be there.

**Craig:** Oh, I said Japanese Daibutsu, I didn’t mean that. A Daibutsu apparently is a giant Buddha, [laughs] so I mean the other thing, like what’s the word for the Japanese business, word for corporation?

**John:** I have no idea.

**Craig:** I’m looking it up right now.

**John:** Okay.

**Craig:** It’s like Zen — it’s zaibatsu.

**John:** Ah.

**Craig:** Okay, that’s a totally, totally reasonable mistake. So I said Daibutsu and I meant zaibatsu.

**John:** Yes, but in Tokyo, that could get you shunned or killed.

**Craig:** I mean, no one’s going to kill — I think the whole point of Buddhism —

**John:** I guess, no, if you call the corporation a Buddha, they’re probably not going to kill you.

**Craig:** And Buddhists just don’t kill you. That’s why they’re the best.

**John:** Yeah, but the thing is that they’re not Buddhas. They’re zaibatsus, not Daibutsus, so.

**Craig:** Well, the zaibatsu people may also worship a Daibutsu. This is the best episode we’ve ever done. And I have to assure people, neither one of us is high right now.

**John:** No, god, no.

**Craig:** No.

**John:** We’re recording this at 1:24 in the afternoon.

**Craig:** On a Friday.

**John:** Yes. So let’s go to our main topic because this is a thing that I’ve definitely noticed for a long time and you and I have gone through this topic before. And I would posit that there’s actually a thing I would call, a variable I’d call the Armageddon delay which is how long it takes a group of screenwriters gathered together to not talk about the end of the world.

**Craig:** Yup. I have witnessed

**John:** It’s this thing that just inevitably comes up.

**Craig:** It does.

**John:** And so we’ve had long online conversations about, specifically the longest one I remember is what do you do in the event of a zombie apocalypse. And I blogged about this. Basically, what is your plan when the zombies attack. And you are way out there in La Cañada, so you have a completely different game plan than I do here in the center of Los Angeles.

**Craig:** Yeah, for sure. So last week or a couple of weeks ago, I joined a writer named Will Staples.

**John:** Mm-hmm.

**Craig:** He wrote a few of the Call of Duty games. And —

**John:** Yeah. And he has the best name ever.

**Craig:** Will Staples.

**John:** Yeah. He’s heir to the Staples fortune, right?

**Craig:** I don’t think so.

**John:** No?

**Craig:** I don’t think so, yeah, or the Staples Center which is also the Staples fortune, nor the Staples Sisters. I think —

**John:** I just think it’s bizarre that there’s an office supply place called Staples that’s named for staples.

**Craig:** Well, it’s also just seems like a dumb name because I mean the whole point is like Amazon, look, we’re as big as the Amazon.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Staples. It’s pretty much what you would think. We got Staples.

**John:** Another Los Angeles chain, a food place, a food service place is called Smart & Final. And it’s like, that’s weird. It’s like it just feels sort of like two adjectives. No, it was named after a man named Smart and a man named Final.

**Craig:** Are you kidding me?

**John:** No, it’s real. There’s a Smart and a Final. And they were grocery stores and they became this sort of warehousey thing over time.

**Craig:** And, you know, Ralphs is not Ralph’s.

**John:** No.

**Craig:** The man’s name is Ralphs with an S. And then keeping with the whole Smart & Final thing, the Outerbridge Crossing, which is a bridge connecting Staten Island to New Jersey, it’s named after a man named Outerbridge.

**John:** Yeah. It just happens to be a bridge —

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** That’s named after Outerbridge.

**Craig:** How about that? Anywho —

**John:** Wouldn’t the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis say that, you know, that the word itself sort of creates the reality? You know, essentially having your name be Outerbridge means that you were destined to —

**Craig:** Design bridges?

**John:** Design bridges perhaps?

**Craig:** Perhaps. I mean it certainly doesn’t explain you or I, although our names are nonsense.

**John:** My name’s made up. My name’s made up, so.

**Craig:** Well, your name’s made up but your real name and my name are very similar actually.

**John:** Yeah, yeah.

**Craig:** And they’re just nonsense. They mean nothing.

**John:** No, mine does mean something. My original name is a kind of bird in German.

**Craig:** Yeah, but that’s German. We —

**John:** Yeah, we live in America.

**Craig:** We’re in America, man. We won the war, bro. Anyway —

**John:** Back to Will Staples.

**Craig:** So Will Staples puts together this group of writers. I was there, Alec Berg of Silicon Valley —

**John:** Mm-hmm.

**Craig:** And Nicole Perlman.

**John:** Oh yeah, Guardians of the Galaxy.

**Craig:** Guardians of the Galaxy and we’ll be having her on the show soon. And we all went out to the Angeles gun range —

**John:** Mm-hmm.

**Craig:** Which is out in like by the Hansen Dam. You don’t know where that is.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** But anyway, we were joined by some military folks. I cannot say of what type. And they’re active duty military folks. And we just —

**John:** They were not Nazis, they were —

**Craig:** No, they’re American military folks —

**John:** Okay.

**Craig:** Of a certain stripe. And we were instructed on shooting all sorts of gun, sniper rifles and .50 caliber Barretts and Israeli machine guns. It was amazing. It was just an incredible day. But it struck home how my strategy, my surmised strategy, is absolutely the correct strategy for where I live. Get up into the Angeles Crest Forest, it’s just full of gun nuts. [laughs] Get around some gun nuts, hunker down, it’s mountainous territory.

**John:** Mm-hmm.

**Craig:** You can see a lot. So, you know, in warfare, you want the high ground. So we get up high, load up on guns and ammo, look down and theoretically I think we should be okay.

**John:** Yeah. That’s a very reasonable — you know, you’re picking a defensive location. You are, you know, barricading but you’re barricading smartly. In the middle of the city, it’s tougher to say what is the right choice to do because certainly for an earthquake we’re well set up for, like we have our supplies and we can get out and —

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** And lord knows we have solar panels, we can sort of do a lot of stuff here at our house for a good long time. But it’s not ideal for a zombie apocalypse because I live like in the heart of the city, so.

**Craig:** That’s right, John.

**John:** I think we’re going to have to just bail and just get out of the city.

**Craig:** And my feeling is always that if you live like where you live, your primary strategy should be an efficient painless suicide.

**John:** [laughs]

**Craig:** Because you’re not going anywhere. I mean, you’re just not.

**John:** Yeah, our emergency kit definitely has the cyanide in it. So I want to talk about sort of why — I’ll just give a quick rundown of sort of what we’re talking about when we’re talking about the end of the world because it’s just such a dominant theme in all of our recent literature really, movie literature, TV literature, written literature.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** So 28 Days Later which is very much the scenario we’re describing, World War Z, The Road, Revolution which is just like all the power goes away, The Walking Dead, End of the World, Shaun of the Dead, Day of the Dead, Terminator which is basically the rise of evil robots.

**Craig:** Yes.

**John:** Planet of the Apes which in this most recent version, is essentially —

**Craig:** Dead dirty apes.

**John:** An outbreak that kills everybody.

**Craig:** Apes.

**John:** Did you see the most recent Planet of the Apes?

**Craig:** What do you think, John?

**John:** You see nothing. You just see nothing. The Hunger Games in terms of, you know, in the movies, it’s not especially clear what has happened to the world that’s put in this place. I guess in the book it’s more clear sort of what happened but like there was I think an environmental catastrophe that sort of led to the world falling apart in that specific way. Outbreak, again, is an outbreak of a disease. The Day After Tomorrow, climate change again. Terra Nova by our friend Kelly Marcel —

**Craig:** Yes.

**John:** Which is basically not… — Well, the world is ending but therefore we’re going back to a primitive time.

**Craig:** With the dinosaur she did not want.

**John:** Yes, yes, lots of quality dinosaurs.

**Craig:** Yes.

**John:** Mad Max, you can’t get sort of more end of the world than Mad Max.

**Craig:** Yes, very, very end of the world.

**John:** And then there’s the things that are sort of in between. So like The Leftovers, which I’m enjoying the series, it’s not the end of the world but it’s just the world is bent in a way that is so irrevocable that it feels like everything has changed.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** And then to some degree you can also even look at like the space epics like Battlestar Galactica which is about the end of the world and the migration to a new place. So we do this a lot and I sort of want to talk about why we do it so much.

**Craig:** Well, there’s something I think inherent to the human condition. We are fascinated by our own mortality for obvious reasons. We also contain a certain amount of inherent self-loathing.

**John:** Yes.

**Craig:** And I think that’s part of the human drive to improve the world around it and to improve itself, right? Humanity is constantly trying to make humanity better, trying to make the world better. We occasionally screw up as we do it but we have that instinct. And that instinct I think is driven in part by the opposition of our self-loathing. I hate the way humans are now. Let’s fix things.

**John:** Yes.

**Craig:** So we will dwell sometimes on the parts of our nature that is awful and come up with ways in which humanity has destroyed the world. Very frequently in the movies you’ve cited, humans have caused this.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Even when the machines rise up to beat us, it’s because humans made Skynet and got lazy. And you can see this over and over that really it’s our fault. We did it.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** And then, of course, when it comes to the idea of zombies, we are externalizing time.

**John:** Mm-hmm.

**Craig:** And particularly when the traditional zombies are slow-moving zombies, they’re just time. They’re just sands in the hourglass. We are all of us running from this very slow zombie called death and it starts shambling after us once we are born and it eventually catches up to us and bites us.

**John:** I think you’re hitting on some of the key themes that are going to be, you know, endemic to any discussion of the end of the world which is mortality, which is the sense of we all know that we’re innately going to die but we want to apply it to everyone at once. And so it’s mortality, but it’s also scale in the way that movies and TV shows and books, they take — generally, they take ordinary experiences and then they heighten them. They push them beyond sort of normal expectations. And so an individual person dies, well, that’s sad and tragic but what happens when everybody dies.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** Well, at a certain point, it stops becoming just, you know, exponentially more tragic and just becomes, wow, it’s completely new framework for how you have to think about sort of what’s there and what’s next.

I think you also hit on that sense of it’s self-loathing but we also have this inner question about like, well, what would I do if I didn’t have all these things.

**Craig:** Mm-hmm.

**John:** In sort of a stoicism that kicks in where I don’t need all these trappings around me. If I can get back to a primitive, more simpler time, I could be great. I could be a king in an earlier time.

**Craig:** Mm-hmm.

**John:** And that I think is a fascination as well. It’s that question of, what would it be like if I were in a time back before we had all these things.

**Craig:** Absolutely.

**John:** Even back to Twain’s like, you know, a Connecticut Yankee at King Arthur’s Court, that sense of like what it would be like to be transported back to a place that was simpler.

**Craig:** And this is particularly seductive for writers.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Writers typically don’t grow up as the head of the cheerleading squad or the quarterback. When writers sit down to imagine starting with a blank slate, they very often drift into a classic conflict between might makes right, and rationality and what we would call enlightened wisdom.

**John:** Yes.

**Craig:** And of course, the screenwriter, the novelist, they [laughs] tend to represent the power of the mind and goodness as opposed to I’m going to hit you over the head and drag you away. If you want to look at the cleanest, simplest version of that, screenwriters are Piggy in Lord of the Flies and the people that used to beat up screenwriters are Jack [laughs] from Lord of the Flies.

**John:** Yeah. Even if you take a look at Lost, which is not the end of the world but it functions the same way where people are stripped away of all of their normal things, it’s a chance to take a look at those archetypes in very clean circumstances because in normal daily life, none of us are like a hero or a villain and we’re all like in line together at Starbucks. But when you take away all the trappings of society, you’re able to look at those stereotypes as archetypes and those drives much more cleanly because there’s not everything else surrounding them. So, you know, by stripping away everything else, you can sort of see what is there.

**Craig:** Yes. Yeah, you know, it’s a truism that so much of what we do during the day is an expression of how we survive. Our survival instinct. Almost never in a day are we making a decision that actually impacts our very survival, but the survival instinct is always there. Is your survival instinct to create a consensus and an alliance based on mutual respect? Is your survival instinct to lash out and defeat? [laughs] Is your survival instinct to lie and cheat? Is your survival instinct to be noble and heroic? That will come out so much more clearly when in fact every choice you make impacts your actual survival.

**John:** I think the key point is that in daily life, your decisions kind of don’t matter that much. Really they don’t. Like, you know, are you going to invest in this or in this? Are we going to have takeout or are we going to cook food at home? It just doesn’t matter, whereas in the scenarios that we’re describing, every little decision matters tremendously because your survival depends on it.

And so you look at, you know, Rick, Lee and the group in The Walking Dead, you know, literally the decision to do we go into town to try to get some more food or do we wait until, you know, some later point, all the decisions are life or death all the time. And in our daily life, we don’t really experience that. And I think there’s an attraction to feeling that danger. That’s the reason why we go to movies and to watch TV shows is that sense to escape our daily life and to imagine ourselves if those decisions we made were actually important, mattered.

**Craig:** Which, by the way, that’s why I’m not a huge fan of the zombie genre, the survive the apocalypse genre. When the genre creates a situation in which every decision is a matter of life and death, I get fatigued by it.

**John:** I do too.

**Craig:** You know. I like the stories where, I mean, like even a Mad Max, I mean he’s driving around, he’s pretty happy and then he runs into some trouble, you know.

I like situations where there’s some sort of stasis. I mean, a typical zombie movie just gives us the world, everything is fine, you fools you don’t know what’s coming, you fools. It’s very anti-human. Zombie movies hate humans by the way. That’s the point of zombie movies is that humans are stupid. But oh, these two or three are noble and so they will continue the humanity forth. It’s very confused. But everything’s fine and then everything goes to hell and then a few people make it out. But it’s all fatiguing to me. And I recognize other people love it but —

**John:** Well, I think part of the fatigue is the futility of it all is that in most zombie stories there is no perceived end to it, like it’s going to suck forever.

**Craig:** Right. [laughs]

**John:** And therefore like, you know, you were joking about sort of like the suicide pills, but like in many ways, like that probably would be the most reasonable course of action because there’s no destination to get to that is actually going to be safe.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** And that becomes an exhausting aspect of two characters who are living in it but also the people who are, by proxy, living in it through watching your story.

**Craig:** Yeah, there’s nowhere safe and there’s also nowhere interesting.

**John:** Mm-hmm.

**Craig:** I mean the world now, the best you can do is find some terrible, uninhabited island that zombies can’t get to where you’ll just sit there for a while. And then, by the way, you’ll die anyway one day. So it’s such a direct metaphor for mortality that it’s just kind of vaguely depressing. And I’ve already accepted that I’m going to die one day anyway, so, you know, meh.

**John:** Meh.

**Craig:** Meh.

**John:** So another kind of end of the world scenario tends to be climate change like some, the cataclysmic event has happened to the world, so either an asteroid has smashed into us, there has been an extinction level event that killed everybody but like they’re not walking around as the dead. And that I find more interesting in some ways because you’re adapting to a new reality but that new reality is not trying to kill you at every moment.

**Craig:** That’s right. I’m totally with you. I’m fascinated by people’s responses to things. It’s interesting to watch characters respond in various ways to a disruption of stasis that can be overcome.

**John:** Yes.

**Craig:** One of my favorite books from childhood was — did you go through your Heinlein phase?

**John:** I didn’t really read the Heinleins. I read like short bits of things but I didn’t go through a big binge.

**Craig:** Well, so you didn’t soak in adolescent space fascism the way that I did. But he wrote this great book called Tunnel in the Sky. I loved this book. And I can’t believe no one’s done this yet. So producers listening to this, somebody go and get this book. Get the rights to this thing and make a series out of it. It would be an awesome series.

So the idea is that in the future, people have to go leave earth and colonize other places because earth is really crowded and that’s the way it goes. And there are special groups of people that go to new planets and kind of are the frontiers people to see like, okay, can we actually live here and if we can, then other people can show up. And so our young hero, he’s a senior basically in high school. All these kids are like really hardened teenagers and they’ve taken this super awesome survival class, right?

And what’s the final exam? They open a tunnel in the sky, a space portal, and they send you somewhere to a planet that no one has been to before or maybe they’ve scouted briefly and you have to survive.

**John:** Mm-hmm.

**Craig:** If you come back alive, you pass.

**John:** Yes.

**Craig:** If you die on the planet, you fail. And so they go there and of course something goes wrong. The tunnel doesn’t open back up in time and they’re marooned there and they must truly survive there. And what was so fascinating to me about the book was that they had to form some kind of society. And, you know, Heinlein was so like, you know, he was such a nut about that stuff.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** So it was really interesting to watch these people like create a constitution and it was very cool. Anyway, I like that sort of thing.

**John:** Well, I think, part of the reason why I like that type of fiction is that the villain is not this faceless thing that’s always going to be there. The villain or the antagonist is going to be someone else who’s in that same situation who wants different things, which is true in real life is that, you know, your antagonist just wants, it has cross purposes to you. And it could be the other group leader who is trying to get your stuff.

And you see that on The Walking Dead. We see like, you know, the real villains become like the mayor of that town or the sheriff or whatever his name was who is much more dangerous honestly than most of the zombies in the world. And yet, ultimately, you feel the fatigue of like, but there’s always going to be more zombies out there.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** And so in the scenarios in which like everyone has died and you’re starting to create a new society, Stephen King’s The Stand is an example of that.

**Craig:** Yes.

**John:** You’re trying to create a new society and so you don’t have to worry about the dead people. You only have to worry about sort of what happens next. And so as I read The Stand, or reading the sort of unabridged The Stand, I was so excited to see these groups coming back together and trying to figure out how to build society from scratch, which is a good segue to this book I’m reading right now, which I’m loving, which is The Knowledge: How to Rebuild our World from Scratch. It’s by Lewis Dartnell. And it’s talking about exactly that topic which is if everything did go away, how would you start everything over again?

**Craig:** Well, you’d use Sugru.

**John:** The Sugru would be, obviously, the first thing you would go to because you need to have good grippy handles on all the tools, the hoes that you’re now using for agriculture.

**Craig:** You’ve got to have hoes in a new world.

**John:** You’ve got to have hoes in probably two — two dimensions of hoes.

**Craig:** When things go bad, the first thing I go looking for, hoes.

**John:** Mm-hmm.

**Craig:** And the guy with the most hoes obviously is the most powerful.

**John:** Because his agriculture would be unstoppable.

**Craig:** [laughs] Because his soil will be so well tilled.

**John:** [laughs] Yes. He will have fertility.

**Craig:** Yeah. [laughs] Oh god, this is the worst.

**John:** Terrible.

**Craig:** This is either the best or the worst that I can remember.

**John:** Terrible metaphors stacked upon each other. So Craig —

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** I think, before reading this book, I’ve given it a lot of thought, and I always had this sort of vision in my head where I did get like transported back to year 0.

I’d be like, wow, you know, I would know so much and I would be able to therefore rocket, you know, science ahead, like people would benefit so much from everything I could tell them.

**Craig:** What year have you gone back to?

**John:** Let’s say I’d go back to year 0 or year 1.

**Craig:** Oh, they would stone you to death almost instantly.

**John:** Oh, they would stone me to death. But let’s say I’d go back to some place that likes me and —

**Craig:** No, you want to be somewhere in the, I would say, the 1600s, 1500s would be nice. Anything before that, if you start talking about atoms —

**John:** No, I don’t think even talking about atoms. I think you can talk about some sort of fundamental things. First off, you and I know, we know that there’s a new world. We know that there’s a —

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** We do know some fundamental things that could be very, very useful to people. But what’s challenging is we don’t know some fundamental things, like you and I don’t know fundamental things that are super crucial like, how to make steel?

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** How to sort of make furnaces. I kind of know how to make electricity. But I don’t know how to make the wire and the magnets that we’re going to need to forge the electricity.

**Craig:** No, what you’re describing is the difference between creators and consumers. We’re consumers of technology.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** We’re not creators of technology. So it’s literally of no use. It would be like if you went back in time and you were a very well-read person, you’re not going to be able to cheat Mark Twain by writing Huck Finn instead of him. You won’t be able to do it, you know. We will be, look, if I go back in time, I don’t care where I’m going. I’m just going to keep my head down, [laughs], try not to get burned at the stake, you know, I’m Jewish which is already an issue.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** You know, I’m just going to like keep my head down. Certainly, if I were going , like if you sent me back to a time when I thought I could do some good, I would try to do good. I would.

**John:** Right. So just so we’re clear, zombies, you head for the hills.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** To the past, you keep your head down low.

**Craig:** Keep head down low. Keep your head down. Remember, those people are not like us at all. Speak of the dumbest mob on the planet currently. Go to whatever country you feel has the dumbest, most ignorant people. Find them at their worst. That’s everybody back in the day. That is the entire world in the year 500.

**John:** The other challenge, I think, and I haven’t gotten so far in the book to know whether he actually addresses this, is clearly you need a critical mass of people in order to do any of the kinds of bigger projects that he’s talking about. So you can’t build a dam with just, you know, five people. You can’t make steel with five people.

But so much of what we’ve done historically has been on the backs of slaves. And so could you go back in time and, or yes, even go forward in time like let’s say everything falls apart. Could you rebuild civilization without slavery? And I would hope so.

**Craig:** Yeah, I think so.

**John:** But certainly it would be challenging.

**Craig:** I think so. But how awkward for us if the answer is, no, you can’t. Like, oh man.

**John:** Yeah, that slavery is just like a key, crucial component at certain point.

**Craig:** You know, we’re really progressive people, but ooh.

**John:** Ooh, but, [laughs] I’m going to have to make you my slave. Sorry.

**Craig:** I’ve got to own humans now. Oh well, sigh.

**John:** Sigh.

**Craig:** Yeah. Yeah, you know, I think we could do it without slaves. I feel pretty good about that.

**John:** Yeah, so a zombie situation or any situation in the future without medicine. So what do you do without, not just even without the technical knowledge but without the actual medicines and what do you do without the technology to be able to look inside a person? And so this book goes through like how to create x-ray machines, but that’s —

**Craig:** Oh no.

**John:** No. Challenging.

**Craig:** No, no. Yeah. The way to kind of handcraft an x-ray machine probably involves the cancerous death of the crafter. I don’t know. [laughs] I mean if the zombies come and I’m up in the hills, you’re going to want some basics, you know. There are medical basics which should keep you alive for awhile. But there’s simply no way to avoid the fact that even if no zombie ever breaches your perimeter —

**John:** Mm-hmm.

**Craig:** Life expectancy is going to plummet.

**John:** It is because mortality is not just, you know, that zombie biting you. Mortality is all the things that could kill you, but wouldn’t kill in normal society because there is disinfectant and there is a doctor and there is simple surgeries. So that impacted tooth could kill you.

**Craig:** Childbirth.

**John:** Childbirth, incredibly dangerous.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** Yeah, I wouldn’t recommend it.

**Craig:** No, there’s [laughs].

**John:** [laughs]

**Craig:** I’ve personally, I’ve watched it and I caused it to happen. But I —

**John:** Yes, and I’ve cut cords.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** But I wouldn’t want to do it in a non-medical setting.

**Craig:** No. No, I’m just befuddled. Again, I really do believe this. The same instinct that makes people want to write stories about how humans have destroyed the world, it’s the same thing that leads them to say, I think a home birth is better for my baby than a hospital birth. I don’t think the baby cares.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** There’s like a weird thing where people want to turn away from the modern because they suspect it. They feel that it’s all tainted by something quote- unquote, “unnatural”. But there’s nothing unnatural about humans doing stuff. We’d been doing it forever.

**John:** So I think that keys in to sort of my final point here, which is that, all these dystopian scenarios that we’re laying out, I think underlying most of them is this utopian ideal that’s there. And what you describe in terms of like, oh, it would be so much better without modern medicine or if, you know, we’ll be able to have natural things, the people would just chew willow bark instead of taking drugs.

**Craig:** [laughs]

**John:** There’s a utopian idea there. And I kind of applaud that utopian idea. But at the same, we need to recognize that that’s, you know, that’s not realistic. And you can’t get some of those few utopian ideals without all the stuff that feeds into making those possible. You can’t have perfect representational democracy and still get those power lines lit. Ideals are wonderful things, but the reality on the ground can be quite a different thing.

**Craig:** I completely agree. I think that one of the interesting things we see from culture and from stories about the end of the world and the recreation of a new world is that we tend to give more credence to dystopian visions. Because we feel like a self-critique is more valid, whereas utopian ideals seem sugary and silly and corny. But the truth is they’re both dumb. There will never be a perfect world nor is there going to be some horrendous awful world.

The world we have will continue to get better. I think things are better now than they’ve ever been before, as bad as they are. And I think things will get better. But there’s no utopia.

**John:** No. And there are dystopias in the modern world. But luckily, they’re pockets of dystopia that hopefully can be eradicated and they will show up somewhere else. So like, Somalia seems like a dystopia at times.

**Craig:** Liberia.

**John:** Liberia, yeah absolutely. And, you know —

**Craig:** If you go Liberia and Syria.

**John:** You look at some of the things that are happening in Iraq right now, there is huge pockets of terribleness, but that’s not the general state.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** But let’s talk about it from a writer’s point of view in terms of you are creating a story that is taking place in one of these worlds. And what of the crucial things because the world building you’re doing here is very important and there are useful short-hands and then there are some really dangerous short-hands. And, you know, we talked about expectation. And so if you’re doing a zombie story, you get a lot of zombie stuff for free. We sort of know basically how zombies work.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** And you have to be clear about the things you’re changing. So it’s no longer a spoiler, but in The Walking Dead series you don’t have to be bit, you know this right, you don’t have to bit in The Walking Dead series to become a zombie. You just will become a zombie when you die. And so that’s an important rule change they had to make. But kind of everything else with zombies they got for free.

**Craig:** Yeah, yeah.

**John:** Or 28 Days Later, like they are fast zombies. They have to make that clear. But that’s an easy thing to make clear.

**Craig:** We can see it, they’re fast, yeah. Those basic monster rules, sure.

**John:** Basic monster rules. But yeah, I think you have to extend beyond those, then take a look at like what is the overall world in which your story is taking place. And that could eat a lot of pages as you’re trying to describe it. And so you have to be very, very smart about what you’re doing and how you’re doing it.

**Craig:** Mm-hmm.

**John:** The initial images you’re showing will lead us to believe whether this is a Mad Max world or a Hunger Games world. And those aren’t the same thing.

**Craig:** Yeah. Or a world of your own making that’s just fresh and interesting. I mean, Snowpiercer, the entire world is a train.

**John:** Absolutely.

**Craig:** Yeah, you know, there are movies, I mean Blade Runner obviously was a huge influence on anybody that was trying to write some sort of dystopian future. I thought that Rian Johnson did a great job in Looper of just casually setting up a world that wasn’t, I don’t think of it as dystopian.

**John:** It’s not dystopian, no.

**Craig:** It’s just it’s kind of just the world. It’s just —

**John:** Yeah, it’s messed up in a way that would be realistic for the world to get messed up in.

**Craig:** That’s right, exactly, but not a dystopia per se. Yeah, you want to make sure if you’re going to write a world, a dystopian world, that you have some sort of point. And here is where I think a lot of dystopian movies go awry. They’re just too on the nose.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** You know, humanity must work together and stop killing the planet. I mean we get it. We know. Yes. Absolutely. [laughs] But surely, there’s something else to say.

**John:** So you have to look for what is the, you know, your movie can’t just be about this world you created. This world you created has to support the story you’re trying to tell. And so I think an example of a movie that does it really well is The Matrix.

**Craig:** Yes.

**John:** And so The Matrix is this, obviously, it’s sort of two levels of dystopia. Like Neo is in this sort of messed up world to start with. But then you realize like, oh it’s actually much more worse than you think. And it’s Neo’s story. And so that’s the backdrop for this journey that he’s going on throughout the course of the story. And it’s exciting because it works. But if it had just been that cool world, who cares?

**Craig:** Exactly. And part of what I see sometimes is that the dystopia is a straw dummy set up for the screenwriter to knock down. Elysium, the concept of Elysium was that very rich people lived on this space station floating above the planet. And then all the have-nots lived on the planet where they suffered. Well, that’s just, it’s too simple. You know, so you want to get —

**John:** It’s way too simple.

**Craig:** Yeah, if you want to get angry at the 1%, it could have been like space 1%. It’s just too obvious. And the whole movie feels like a rigged job for people to basically tell rich folks, you stink, which often times they do.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Of course, the people making the movie are all super rich. And the movie was made by a mega corporation. All of which just seemed very odd to me.

**John:** Yeah. But you compare that movie, it’s the same director to District 9, which actually had fascinating things to say.

**Craig:** Ah-ha. Yes, exactly.

**John:** And so District 9 could talk about immigration and squalor and —

**Craig:** Racism.

**John:** And racism. And it focused on a character who could move from one world into that other world and actually become a part of that world which Matt Damon’s character never did in Elysium.

**Craig:** Well yeah, and so part of what made District…9?

**John:** District 9, yeah.

**Craig:** District 9. I always want to say District 7, I don’t know why. But District 9, part of what made it so good was that it was getting into this really greasy stuff about what it means to be a policeman.

**John:** Mm-hmm.

**Craig:** And to be a policeman in a bad neighborhood. And to feel like you are both a part of and at war with the community around you. You have this sympathy and then this repulsion and disgust. Some of those people, you’re there to help. Some of those people are there to hurt you. You start to hurt them. That stuff is good, greasy stuff to get into.

**John:** Yeah, because they’re deep human themes but also completely relatable to modern experience.

**Craig:** And there’s conflict to it, you know.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** You can see how a human being becomes torn by the dilemmas of all this. But, you know, if you just get too on the nose with your conceit, then it’s just like, no! It’s a little bit, you know, I mean it goes back to The Time Machine, Eloi and the Ewoks, or whatever the other ones were. [laughs]

**John:** [laughs] Well, I want to step back for a second, when you say like you see the dilemma. Dilemma is another word for a choice. And the dilemma is you’re forcing your protagonist to make a choice between this way of doing things and a new way to doing things. And the choice that you want them to make is generally the one that’s going to cause them the most pain but is the one that’s going to lead to an outcome that’s rewarding.

Now I would also state that like the dystopia doesn’t have to be the thing itself. In some ways it can function like a MacGuffin. And so if you go back to Terminator, you know, Terminator is coming to kill Sarah Connor. So while we see these moments of dystopia before John Connor , wait, no.

**Craig:** Yes.

**John:** John Connor comes back, we see these moments of dystopia where like, you know, tanks are crushing human skulls. Most of the story is not that. Most of the story is this chase movie set in the real present day things against this incredibly dangerous killer robot.

So that dystopia is an incredibly important piece of set up and is a thing to avoid, but in order for the movie to resolve successfully she has to win and defeat this one thing. She doesn’t have to stop the apocalypse. That’s a part of what she’s doing. That’s the overall goal is just, you know, she learns to, she’s going to be carrying a baby who’s going to be this important leader. But she herself doesn’t have to stop Skynet within the course of this one thing. And it lets it be much more contained and let’s it be a story about human beings rather than this grand Skynet.

**Craig:** Yeah. And The Terminator is I think the best version of the zombie story anyway. You know, he can’t be reasoned with, he can’t be defeated. He will never stop no matter what. Very zombie-like, right? It just keeps on coming. You chop him in half, he keeps on coming. But he is defeatable.

And ultimately you can defeat it. And that’s why Terminator is I think a more interesting story ultimately than the general zombie story because we like stories where we triumph over death. At least, if I’m going to do a fantasy story, and all science fiction is fantasy. Terminator is fantasy and zombie movies are fantasy. If I’m going to do a fantasy story, I might as well — I’m an optimist, so I like fantasy stories about triumphing over death, even of course, in the end, though, everyone dies.

**John:** Mm-hmm. Yeah, everyone does die.

**Craig:** You die, she dies, they all die.

**John:** To wrap this up, I would say that, you know, you and I are both fans of life with a purpose. And therefore, hopefully death with a purpose as well. And so if in crafting these stories, you’re able to make that character’s existence meaningful in the course of the movie’s world, that’s success.

**Craig:** A good purposeful death is a wonderful thing.

**John:** I agree. Craig, I think that’s the end of the world for us here in the end of our show. Do you have a One Cool Thing?

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** Yeah? [laughs]

**Craig:** Yeah. I’m trying to decide between two. I think I’m going to go with this one. Have I talked about this, I don’t know, I always feel like I’m app heavy. So I was thinking like, you choose, do you want a One Cool Thing that’s an app or One Cool Thing that’s something you can hold in your hand and put in your mouth?

**John:** I’m going to pick an app for myself, so why don’t you do the thing you put in your mouth?

**Craig:** Okay. So I was over at Chicago Fire/PDs creator’s home, Derek Haas.

**John:** Yes.

**Craig:** His wife put out all this —

**John:** His wife is the best.

**Craig:** She’s the best.

**John:** I love Kristi. She’s the best.

**Craig:** She is the best. So Kristi put out all these things because we had all the kids together and she put out these things. And it was boxed water. Have you seen this?

**John:** Yeah, I’ve seen boxed water.

**Craig:** Yeah, boxed water. Okay, well you live in fancy town. I live, you know, in Mormonville where we don’t have boxed water. And so I thought it was pretty genius. I hate bottled water. I hate the concept of bottled water. I hate the bottles. I don’t understand why we don’t just drink water out of the tap. I’m the one guy left in LA that drinks water out of his tap.

**John:** I only drink water out of the tap. Out of the tap or out of like the filtered pitcher.

**Craig:** Okay, exactly. So I don’t understand, I mean, understand occasionally if you’re serving people or things and you don’t want keep filling stuff up, maybe then. Or if you’re going somewhere I guess. But people, it makes me nuts. Anyway, at least with boxed water, you’re not just filling the trash with all these bottles. It’s much easier to recycle. And you can squish it down. And it’s not a petroleum product. I just don’t … — What is the story with bottled water? Why did that happen? Why?

**John:** I think bottled water serves a crucial need when you cannot count on the safety of your water supply. And so for those purposes, I think bottled water is a great thing. And I guess if your choice is between drinking a soda and drinking a bottled water, the bottle water is healthier for you to be consuming. But in general, I completely agree with you. And that’s why we don’t have any bottled water in the house. And I either drink directly out of the faucet, well, I drink it in a glass.

**Craig:** Right. I will do it out of the faucet.

**John:** Every once in a while, I will do the, you know, the two-hand scooping thing.

**Craig:** Oh really? No, I just do the sideways head, like [lapping noise], like a dog.

**John:** Like the dog lapping.

**Craig:** Where you’re mostly just drinking air, but it feels good. I mean when I was a kid, we used to just drink water out of the hose.

**John:** Yeah. Yeah, you shouldn’t do that honestly because the plastics in a hose are not —

**Craig:** Oh, get out of here. Look at me, I’m as healthy as an ox.

**John:** [laughs] Yes. They actually make hoses, though, that are designed for drinking water that are safe.

**Craig:** I’ve just had it with this. You know what, now I want the world to end. Now I hate the world. Oh, your hose, we’ve got a special hose for your special body. I used to drink out of some nasty hose that was —

**John:** I used to drink out of puddles. [laughs]

**Craig:** [laughs] Yeah. And like our garden hose was smelted in the basement of some weird prison. And it was all coils and nasty chemicals and stuff and it was hot.

**John:** And we liked it.

**Craig:** It was delicious. And the end was like a rusty nozzle.

**John:** That’s good stuff.

**Craig:** Yeah. And look at me, strong.

**John:** Strong.

**Craig:** Strong like an ox.

**John:** You could not be stronger.

**Craig:** Strong like ox.

**John:** My One Cool Thing, I don’t think I’ve talked about it in the show before. And I’m curious whether you use it. It’s Waze. Do you know Waze?

**Craig:** I use Inrix.

**John:** Okay, so same —

**Craig:** Inrix was one of my Cool Things many —

**John:** That was your One Cool Thing a while back.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** So I finally got converted to Waze because I kind of didn’t understand the point of it and then I took a meeting at Amazon which is on the West Side in Santa Monica in the afternoon. I’m like, oh, why did I do this? I’ll never be able to get home. So people who don’t live in Los Angeles, you should understand the east/west divide in Los Angeles isn’t a we hate them and they hate us. It’s that it’s actually physically impossible to move from the West LA to East LA at certain times of the day or vice versa.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** It takes forever.

**Craig:** It’s also impossible to move North and South in various spots. It’s just impossible to move.

**John:** Yeah. It can be very, very challenging to move. So in my life, after about 4 PM, so like 4 PM to 8 PM, I will not try to sort of go out to Santa Monica or something like that. It’s just madness. But I took this meeting, I’m like, oh, crap. So it was only an hour, so I get out and it’s like, you know what, I’m going to try Waze.

And so the idea behind Waze is it’s like Google Maps or Maps on the iPhone where it’s telling you which way how to go expect that in real time it’s updating it based on how fast and slow these streets are moving, partially based on other people who are using Waze and calculating their speeds.

And so Waze will send you in these crazy ways, literally ways, to get you to your destination. But it actually works. And so I got home in like 35 minutes which is just impossible.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** But I took like the weirdest streets imaginable. So you just have to trust it, but it works.

**Craig:** Oh yeah. No, that’s the same thing with Inrix. I’ve been using it forever. And particularly for me because I live a bit a further afield than you do, it’s absolutely essential.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** There’s nothing that feels better than getting into my car, putting in, you know, and I’ve saved all the various locations that I want, but I can always put new ones in, and I go, “Okay, what’s the fastest way to get home?” And they show me the way I would have gone home which is a disaster and their way which is like 20 minutes faster. Oh, it’s the nicest feeling.

**John:** Blessed be.

**Craig:** Yes, yeah.

**John:** Alright. Well, that’s our show this week. So if you would like to talk to me or Craig about the end of the world or our plans for it, you can reach Craig, @clmazin on Twitter, I’m @johnaugust. Longer questions and statements can be directed to ask@johnaugust.com. We are on iTunes and so you should subscribe to us there. And while you’re there, you can leave us a comment and let us know about the show and what you think. You can also subscribe to Slate’s podcast there if you feel like it because that would be a nice thing to do.

The show is produced by Stuart Friedel who’s out sick right now. So I’m hoping he’s feeling better. Oh, Stuart.

**Craig:** Oh no!

**John:** Yeah, basically everyone in the office is sick except for me. So I’m just, yeah, yeah. So if they all, if it becomes an extinction-level event, it’s just going to be me doing the podcast, I guess.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** I’ll have to do it myself.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** Matthew Chilelli edits the podcast. Thank you, Matthew for that. I think our outro this week is going to be the one from, it’s actually the jingle from Stride gum which is exactly the same melody as the Scriptnotes melody.

**Craig:** Stride gum?

**John:** Wait, no, it’s actually Orbit gum. But anyway, I’ll put that on as the outro. But we would love more outros from our listeners. So if you would like to do a riff on our [hums], you can send it to ask@johnaugust.com or put it up on SoundCloud with a #scriptnotes and we will do it.

**Craig:** I was listening to a bunch of those. They’re really good.

**John:** They’re really good.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** So Matthew Chilelli who cuts our show has done a lot of the really great ones. But there is some competition there. There’s some really good people out there who’ve done amazing things.

**Craig:** Yeah, no, I liked a lot of them. I’m always impressed that people even do it all but they can do it.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** It’s amazing. Can we do a, find like, I don’t know, Stuart is out. Maybe Matthew can dig up a little clip of Jaye P. Morgan for the very end there.

**John:** We’ll try to find a little clip of Jaye P. Morgan being her Morganist.

**Craig:** So pretty.

**John:** Pretty in that old way. The way that people used to —

**Craig:** That glamorous old way. Yeah.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** The way people used to be pretty. They’re not anymore, it’s true.

**John:** So our last reminders. People should vote for the WGA board. If you would like a t-shirt, you should let us know that you would like a t-shirt. And just go to johnaugust.com. There’s still a few leftover t-shirts from way back when in the store but this is really a question for what t-shirt should we make next if we want to make t-shirts. And you should buy tickets for the Slate Culture Gabfest because it will sell out and then you will not get to see us. So there’s a link to all these things we talked about on the show at johnaugust.com/scriptnotes.

If you would like to listen to all the back episodes of Scriptnotes, those are available at scriptnotes.net and you can also get them through the app which is for Android and for iOS.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** Craig, have a great week.

**Craig:** You too, John.

**John:** Bye.

**Craig:** Bye.

Links:

* 2014’s WGA Candidate Night is [September 3rd](http://www.wga.org/content/default.aspx?id=5597)
* [Jaye P. Morgan](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaye_P._Morgan) is still alive
* [Get tickets now](http://www.slate.com/live/la-culturefest.html) for October 8th’s live Slate Culture Gabfest with guests John and Craig
* [The Knowledge: How to Rebuild Our World from Scratch](http://www.amazon.com/dp/159420523X/?tag=johnaugustcom-20) by Lewis Dartnell
* [Boxed Water](http://www.boxedwaterisbetter.com/) is better
* [Waze](https://www.waze.com/) gets you there with real-time help
* [Outro](http://johnaugust.com/2013/scriptnotes-the-outros) by [Orbit](http://www.orbitgum.com/) ([send us yours!](http://johnaugust.com/2014/outros-needed))

Scriptnotes, Ep 158: Putting a price on it — Transcript

August 22, 2014 Scriptnotes Transcript

The original post for this episode can be found [here](http://johnaugust.com/2014/putting-a-price-on-it).

**John August:** Hello and welcome. My name is John August.

**Craig Mazin:** Here, man, my name is Craig Mazin. Right?

**John:** And this is Scriptnotes, a podcast about screenwriting and things that are interesting to screenwriters.

Craig, we are trying to record this episode live. It’s nearly a week before this episode will come out, so it’s probably one of the most in advance episodes we’ve ever done.

**Craig:** Well, and also we’re doing this, so we’ve got these people listening along with us on Mixlr.com. So, they’re cheating basically. They’re hearing this early. Plus, they get to hear all the nonsense that we cut out, which I should say most of which is you saying things like, “Blah, blah, blah, that was terrible.” [laughs]

**John:** You’ll see all the false starts and the do-overs. But in many ways the 25 people who are in the chat room, they’re living slightly in the future, because they get to experience the Scriptnotes episode before anyone else on the planet gets to experience it.

**Craig:** That is exactly right. This is fun. I’m reading along with the things they’re saying. This is great. I’m going to have to stop because it’s going to be distracting.

**John:** You’re going to have to stop. It’s going to be very distracting.

**Craig:** It’s going to be very distracting. So, I’m leaving the chat room, but I’m excited that people are listening along with us as we do this live and not live at the same time.

**John:** So, today we talked about our topics and it’s going to be about the price of things. It’s going to be about Amazon versus Hachette, Amazon versus Disney. They’re all wrestling over what things should cost and what price people should pay. We’re going to look at the Weinstein Brothers putting a price on a free internship.

**Craig:** Yeah, man, there’s going to be a price for it, all right?

**John:** We’re going to look at animation studios who are trying to hold down the prices that they’re paying to their workers. And finally we’re going to try to answer some questions from the people who are sitting around in the chat room very patiently waiting while we figure out how we’re actually recording this episode.

**Craig:** So much. So much.

**John:** But first off we should start with some follow up and really some corrections. I always love in newspapers when they talk about the mistakes they’ve made and regretting the error. Well, in our last podcast we got to kind of do that because there were some significant errors at the end of the podcast last week.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** And I’ll blame it on jetlag, but anyway we need to sort of address them. So, you were talking about a Gentleman’s Guide to Love and Murder.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** And the actor in that is Jefferson Mays.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** But I said Jefferson Davis.

**Craig:** Correct.

**John:** Who, of course, was the role played by Sherman Hemsley in Norman Lear’s comedy The Jeffersonians.

**Craig:** Correct.

**John:** So, completely confused that.

**Craig:** Great 1990s era sitcom.

**John:** And Jefferson Davis, of course, was the president of the Confederacy, or you sad that it was Jefferson, he was the president of the Confederacy. But that’s not right at all. That was Robert E. Lee Daniels who was the director of films like Precious, Based on the Novel Push by Lyle Waggoner.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** So, we really messed up a lot of stuff there, but we regret the error. And we try to fix our mistakes when we see those mistakes.

**Craig:** Well, the good news is that we do. I mean, we take the time to get it right. We may not get it right the first time, but the second time around we’re very good.

**John:** We’re really good. We aim for clarity and just perfection.

**Craig:** I would actually say we’re the best.

**John:** We are the best. Yet, another mistake we made is that we said that we’re going to both be at the Austin Film Festival October 23 to the 26. That’s not actually accurate, is it Craig?

**Craig:** It’s half true. I’m sorry, guys. I can’t go this time because one of my best friends in the whole world is getting married that weekend and it’s a small wedding and I and my wife will be in attendance. It’s on that Saturday.

And I thought about trying to squeeze in, like maybe if I just fly out Thursday night and I leave Friday afternoon or Friday night, but it was turning into a disaster and I couldn’t figure out how to make it work. So, unfortunately this Austin — it will be the first one I’ve missed in a number of years, but I’ll be back next year for sure, no matter what.

**John:** But we already promised them a Scriptnotes episode. So, we talked about sort of who would be the perfect person to take Craig’s place if Craig could not be there.

**Craig:** But that person was not available so you got…[laughs]

**John:** We got Kelly Marcel.

**Craig:** Yeah!

**John:** And so I’m so excited that Kelly Marcel will be co-hosting the live Scriptnotes that we’ll do in Austin.

**Craig:** Yes, it’s good. You guys are a great team together and it’s always good to — she’s very good at the podcasting thing. Not everybody is, by the way. Although we’ve never actually had a bad guest, I don’t think. Even Richard Kelly, it’s a little tough with Richard Kelly sometimes because he’s Richard Kelly, but that’s the way Richard Kelly is. You know when you get Richard Kelly that that’s what you’re going to get. You’re going to get Richard Kelly. So, that was actually great. But we’ve never had a bad guest.

But she’ll be very good and very funny and you guys will be — you’ll do well together.

**John:** While we’re talking about podcast guests, is there anything you want to tell me, Craig?

**Craig:** Okay, so listen, you’ve done this to me and I didn’t say a word. Okay, not a word. Am I proud of what I did? No. [laughs] But I think that I deserve at the very least the forgiveness that I gave you when you whored yourself out there like a trollop to The Nerdist podcast and to god knows what else. I mean, I think you’ve done 12 podcasts.

**John:** I’ve done a few podcasts.

**Craig:** So, I strayed and I happened to do one. I was in New York and I did Brian Koppelman’s podcast. By the way, so Brian Koppelman’s podcast is called The Moment. And I knew that, but I had never thought twice about it. I just thought, okay, well Brian Koppelman has a podcast called The Moment. And he asked me to come on to The Moment and I said, great, I’ll do The Moment. And I showed up for The Moment and we started talking and he was asking me questions and he kept asking questions like, “So was that the moment do you think when…”

And then I realized, “Ooh, oh The Moment is actually about a moment.” That’s the point of this whole thing is that he’s talking about a moment. But I had no idea because, of course, I don’t listen to any podcasts. So, I found out what The Moment was during The Moment.

**John:** So, I would have guessed that his podcast was six seconds long based on his Vine videos. But apparently it was 90 minutes.

**Craig:** It’s lengthy. And I don’t know how he worked this out. I think it’s because The Moment, which sounds vaguely, I don’t know, there’s something intestinal about it, but whatever, like I’m having a moment.

**John:** I was thinking it was sort of more like a moment of orgasm: a moment of just like clarity and sweat and light.

**Craig:** [laughs] That’s exactly what happens to me when I have an orgasm. First comes the clarity. Then the sweat. And then the light. The light is the weirdest part.

His podcast, The Moment — clarity, sweat, light — is associated with ESPN and Grantland. And because it’s ESPN and ESPN is part of the Disney family, we recorded this thing in a proper recording studio at the ABC building in Manhattan. So he’s got like a pretty professional setup, or so I thought. But here’s what happens. You’ll love this.

So this guy brings you in and you have to get your identification and sign in and go through the thing, and go up the stairs, and a man meets you in a lobby that’s essentially a man-trap frankly, because you can’t get down and you can’t get out.

And then an engineer meets you and he says, “Hi, how are you doing, my name is so-and-so.” Great. And he takes you into this proper control both and you go into a proper recording room and you have real microphones and headphones and all the rest. And the guy hits some buttons and then he leaves. He leaves.

So, really what they’ve done with Brian is they’re like, “Here you go buddy. We’re going to hit record and then we’re out of here. And then you just hit stop.” So, it’s kind of professional but also kind of like, “Somebody hit record for Brian, and then we go home, get a beer.”

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Yeah. But it was fun. I enjoyed it. And once I learned what The Moment was about — the moment — then I had a nice moment.

**John:** [laughs] Well, it’s very good. Brian Koppelman is a talented screenwriter and certainly a person who has the best interest of screenwriters at heart. So, if you’re going to cheat on the Scriptnotes Podcast with anyone, Brian Koppelman is the right person to do it with.

**Craig:** Yeah. I feel like we both have hall passes for Brian Koppelman.

**John:** Next bit of follow up, a couple of weeks ago I talked about Goodnight Moon and a terrific piece written about Goodnight Moon and sort of how it’s really very smartly written. Listener Randy Mack pointed me to a McSweeney’s piece by Sean Walsh which I thought was fantastic called A Sparknotes Guide to Goodnight Moon, which is one of those sort of classic study guides to Goodnight Moon, which is of course much longer than the actual book of Goodnight Moon. So, I’m going to put that in the show notes.

But this was a quote from that that I thought was terrific:

The moon in this piece acts as a traditionally feminine sign. Here, the bunny’s final “goodnight moon” demonstrates his completion of his rite of passage and his development into a full man bunny. The moon, which visually appears on every page, grows larger and more pronounced is a chanting feminine voice, haunting and disturbing his world. Just as he must overcome his sexual desire for the woman who says “hush,” the bunny must resist the impending femininity outside of his safe confines.

**Craig:** [laughs] That’s exactly what my kid said to me when I read the book to him. He’s like, “Daddy. Daddy, I have to overcome my sexual desire for the woman who says ‘hush.'”

Uh-huh.

**John:** Uh-huh.

**Craig:** Uh-huh. That was very funny.

**John:** What I love about that writing is it reminds me so much of those papers I wrote in college where like I got to keep filling up pages and so you try to dry a meaning out of things that are just completely meaningless.

**Craig:** I have to say, just as a side note, it just kills me to witness the death of clear writing in academia. It wasn’t always like this, but it certainly was like this when you and I were in college. And I think it’s just become calcified into something that’s permanent in a dreadful way. And I don’t know who to blame, other than academics themselves, for buying into this nonsense.

But very famously there were some guys that wrote a computer program that essentially assembled an essay that was grammatically correct in some strict sense, but full of nothing but argle-bargle nonsense academia words. And it was accepted for publication by a number of very fancy academic journals. It’s just embarrassing. It’s embarrassing. And this would be, if I were in charge, I would be a benevolent dictator, but not with this. With this there would be some kind of terrible purge by fire.

**John:** Yeah. When I was in college I was split between my English major, which was writing those argle-bargle papers, and like my post-modernism class, and I was a journalism major. So you had to write incredible clear things for journalism. And that was much better training, I thought.

**Craig:** That is far better training. Far better. There’s really no function. There’s no purpose, function, or value in that kind of over dense fruitcake writing. I don’t mean fruitcake in the la-di-da. I mean fruitcake like something that has too much mass for its shape. [laughs] It’s just — it’s just too much. It’s too much.

**John:** Yeah. It’s too much candy, fruit, and nuts and not actual substance.

**Craig:** It is. You could make a list of words, I mean, semiotic — semiotic means something. That is to say it used to mean something and now in an ironic way it is a signifier but it actually means nothing. It means nothing anymore.

**John:** Yeah. It means that you can stop paying attention.

**Craig:** That’s right. You can turn your brain off. Yup.

**John:** Our last bit of follow up is a question from Mario who writes, “In the excellent…”

**Craig:** Mario!

**John:** Mario.

**Craig:** Mario!

**John:** “In the Rocky Shoals episode during the discussion on the topic of tone, Aline brings up,” Aline Brosh McKenna, the best, “she brings up that she will sometimes write things characters might be thinking but are not saying in order to help make the tone clear.”

**Craig:** Yes.

**John:** “How do you go about properly formatting this kind of thing? Do you put it in parenthesis? Quotation marks? Do you italicize it? Or is the fact that it’s written in a block of action and not in dialogue enough for readers to understand what it means?”

**Craig:** That’s a good question. I do this, too. And it depends on the moment and how I’ll do it. I won’t put it in quotation marks or italicize it, but I will choose typically between either a line of action or in parenthesis. For instance, this very day I wrote an exchange where someone says, “I’m from London.” And a woman and a man are listening. And the woman says, “Oh?” But in parenthesis it says (Ooh!). And the man says, “Huh?” And in parenthesis it says (I hate you). So, that will give the actors plenty of context. Certainly it will give the reader plenty of context as to what’s going on there. But you could also do this is action, too.

You could write something like, “John is disgusted. John, ‘Well that’s just terrific.” You know, sure, no problem.

**John:** Yeah. So a parenthetical is perfect if you’re trying to color the delivery of a line. And so if what they’re saying may not be obvious based on the word choices, because they’re trying to express them and that’s not how they’re actually feeling. But that intermediary line of action is a great place to express what’s sort of really going on.

Because if you’re watching the movie you would see that he’s disgusted. You would see that he’s like, you know, shooting eye daggers. That’s all a valid choice.

So, rarely do you have to format anything special.

**Craig:** That’s right.

**John:** Craig, a question for you, though. This is something I just ran into in the thing that I’m writing. I needed to sort of ellipses a line of dialogue but I needed to make clear what it was that they were going to say.

**Craig:** Ah.

**John:** Have you ever done that? Where you put that in brackets afterwards, like the part that got cut off at the end of the sentence?

**Craig:** I’ve actually never done that.

**John:** It was the first time I’d ever done it.

**Craig:** But I’ve seen it. And I can see in certain situations where it would be of value. But I always feel like, well, it’s hard to act that. You know, I always think about the actors and I can understand how to act putting in parentheses (I hate you) and then the line is “Oh, that’s interesting.” But I don’t know how to act “I’m not sure if I…” and then in brackets [can marry you].

I think in part it should be somewhat evident from the first part of it. But I can imagine a specific situation where you’re kind of jammed into where it’s like, yes, actually, this is appropriate. The actor would understand why I put that there, etc.

**John:** So, the exact situation I was in is there is a police officer, there is a woman who has come on the scene, and there is an hysterical woman. And our hero character is saying to the police officer, “Can you get rid of this woman.” And so it’s just, “Can you…” but in brackets [take care of her].

**Craig:** Get rid of this woman. My instinct, what I would do, and what you did there is absolutely fine. I think what I would probably have done is say, “Can you…” and then a line of action “He signals his partner to get rid of her.”

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** But it’s the same. And, frankly, you know, it’s all about just how to get things to.. — The only thing I would advise is if you’re going to do it in an action block, it’s good for it to kind of be descriptive as the third person omniscient.

If you’re doing it in parentheses or in brackets then it is good to do it as unspoken dialogue, dialogue that they’re thinking in their heads like “I hate you” as opposed to “He hates him.” That kind of thing, you know.

**John:** All right, let’s get to our topics of the day. So, Amazon is having an interesting week, or a couple weeks. They seem to be having disagreements with several of the people who are supplying them things.

First off is Hachette, a big publisher. And this has been an ongoing fight where they are disagreeing about the price of eBooks. So, Amazon has tried to price books, eBooks, at $9.99, because that’s what they want to sell things for on Kindle. And they have stopped selling certain Hachette, a big publisher’s titles, because they cannot come to an agreement on price.

And so we’ll have a couple links to different articles about this in the show notes. But, Craig, I’m curious what your first thought is when you see this dispute between Hachette and Amazon.

**Craig:** I have grown increasingly wary of Silicon Valley’s disdain for content. They are so unconcerned with anything that isn’t about an increasingly efficient capital machine, something that generates profits for them. And I don’t begrudge them that. That’s what businesses do. But they are ruthless and ruthless almost in a self-destructive way. They’re kind of devouring the very basis of the things that supply them.

And this is an example. I understand why they want to do this, but look, the fact of the matter is Hachette is also a business. They’re allowed to make money. Their authors, more importantly, are allowed to make royalties. And just because Amazon wants to sell something at a price doesn’t mean it gets to.

**John:** I agree with you. So, I generally approach this from the perspective of like, well, that’s business. And so Hachette and Amazon have probably been negotiating and arguing about this for a long time. But I get annoyed when it spills out into the public and they try to fight in public.

And I got annoyed the same way with Comcast and CBS, or was it Time Warner and CBS? Anyway, the cable company that was fighting CBS in New York City, where they tried to make it a big public battle rather than sort of the private negotiation that business actually is.

Business is about you have certain costs of making something. And you are going to look at those costs as part of your price and you are going to charge a certain price to people. That price may be a price that a retailer is willing to accept. It may be a price that a retailer is not willing to accept. Amazon totally has the right not to sell Hachette books. Hachette has the right not to sell Amazon its books for the price Amazon wants.

But this whole public campaign, Amazon went off with this Readers United website.

**Craig:** Oh please.

**John:** And they’ve quoted Orwell and sort of misquoted Orwell. And they’re trying to make the case that books, eBooks, should cost $9.99 because they have so much lower cost than a hardback book would be, or even a paperback book would be. But it’s interesting because to me you never really comment on the costs of things unless you’re saying that things should cost less.

**Craig:** That’s right. They’re not making an argument of value.

**John:** No.

**Craig:** They’re looking — what they’re doing is they’re looking at books as widgets and they’re saying, listen, uh, yeah, somebody sprinkles magic fairy dust on wood pulp and glue and I suppose that’s what makes words that people are interested in. But really what we’re talking about is wood pulp and glue. And you guys have eliminated the wood, pulp, and glue, so you should charge us less to run these books on our website and retail these books.

And the answer is no. No, that’s not what gives the book value. Frankly, one could argue that books have been undervalued for a long time and that this is a way to return value to them. The value is in the content. It’s not in the card stock or any of that.

God forbid the price, the real price — not the adjusted for inflation price — but the real price of content should go up. God forbid. God forbid that creators should make more money. That’s like — that’s literally something that never enters the algorithm of these people. But it’s true.

And, you know, if Amazon feels so strongly that books should be $9.99, they should sell them for $9.99 and make no money off of them.

**John:** Well, that’s honestly what’s been happening though is Amazon has been buying them and selling them at a loss to try to establish a price in people’s heads that $9.99 is the right price for them.

**Craig:** Well, they made their bed. That’s it. They made their bed. By the way, Amazon does this all the time. There was a really interesting — I read an article about a guy that decided he was going to sell diapers online. It was actually a pretty interesting business of selling diapers online. It was just something people weren’t buying online and he figured out a way to do it. And Amazon basically offered him a bunch of money to buy his company. He said no. We really like our model and we’re doing very well.

So, then Amazon decided to compete with him and to destroy him. They began selling diapers at a loss because it was more important for them to carve out competition and create another monopolistic beachhead than it was to actually make a profit.

And, frankly, Amazon struggles with profits from what I understand because they seem more interested in just selling everything and eliminating competition than they actually are interested in making money. So, they’ll do things like this. They’ll sell books for $9.99 because they imagine some world where eventually everybody will have to sell them for less to Amazon, right. But that’s not the way it works. And I hope, honestly, that Hachette and all of the authors they represent stick it to Amazon on this one.

I’m so tired of Amazon. By the way, I buy stuff from Amazon every day. So, I’m the worst. [laughs]

**John:** Yeah, I want to talk about the hypocrisy of that because —

**Craig:** The worst. I am such a hypocrite.

**John:** No, I would argue that there’s hypocrisy but there’s also reality. And so I buy stuff off of Amazon and so I had a tweet last week about my frustration with this Readers United thing and said like, you know what, I’m not going to be buying any Kindle books for awhile until this gets settled out, because that part of the business is frustrating to me.

And yet at the same time there is Amazon links on my website.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** I bought some composition books for my daughter on Amazon. I don’t fully disagree with all that. Lord, I had a meeting at Amazon this last week. I had a meeting at Amazon on Monday. So, I think there’s parts of the business that are fine and good.

Another blogger made the point that basically there are no good airlines either. Like no matter what you’re going to have a bad experience with an airline. So, if you sort of refuse to go on American Airlines, eventually you’re going to run out of airlines, because you’re going to have a bad problem on every airline. It’s the same kind of thing with Amazon. Eventually you are going to probably want to buy something and Amazon may be the best choice for it.

**Craig:** Amazon, I just wonder if one of these days Amazon doesn’t find itself in the situation that Microsoft found itself in. Which ironically in the prologue to the era of Microsoft’s waning, they were nabbed for antitrust. And they went through a very long, difficult antitrust litigation with the United States government, more severely with European nations.

And the whole time they were like, wait a second, you don’t understand. We’re not a monopoly. We’re doing this stuff because we have to survive and we’re going to die. And everyone was like, shut up, you’re Microsoft. And it turns out actually, yeah, they really were kind of in a little bit of trouble.

I think Amazon is going to run into the same thing. I’m not sure that this whole price thing — somewhere, something in the back of my head says that there’s something funky about this, that deciding you’re not going to — you’re going to sell some people’s products for this price but not other people’s products because you don’t like them or something. I don’t know. I don’t know if that’s — we’ll have to ask some antitrust lawyer what he thinks. Or she.

**John:** Luckily because we have people in the chat room, the blogger I mentioned is actually Marco Arment. So, I knew there was someone, so the point I was making about you can run out of airlines to fly, that was Marco Arment whose post I read.

**Craig:** Good job, Marco.

**John:** Good job, Marco.

The more recent and sort of more directly affecting screenwriters aspect of this is Amazon’s disagreement with Disney about pricing of DVDs and Blu-rays. So, this comes to Captain America, a big hit movie. And Million Dollar Arm. And Muppets Most Wanted. All the Disney movies they have disagreements about what price they want to sell those movies at.

**Craig:** That’s right.

**John:** So, it’s worth talking about what a list price is, because the list price is not the wholesale price. Amazon is paying a certain amount for those discs. And Amazon as a retailer can negotiate what price they’re paying for it. If they don’t like the price they’re paying for it, they can choose not to sell it. And, again, I think that’s fine. There’s no requirement that they need to sell it. But it gets frustrating when it gets public that they’re not doing it, or when they pull the buy buttons off and make it seem like a movie is not coming out, that’s a challenge.

And it’s a challenge because they’ve become so dominant in the home video industry. If you’re not selling your movies through Amazon, that’s going to be a problem. It’s going to cost you.

**Craig:** That’s right. And, again, acting like a bully and that’s part of the nature of capitalism and competition is. It’s hard to blame them for this. It’s also hard to blame Disney for taking a hard line on this. I think the trick with these situations is that the retailer giant, so in the case of say walk in and buy, that would be a Walmart, and online it’s Amazon. The retail giant is one entity. There is a group of people, publishers, or movie studios that are creating a product and they really can’t combine forces the way that Amazon can be consolidated with one policy.

**John:** Absolutely.

**Craig:** Because that’s antitrust.

**John:** That was exactly what happened in the publishers with Apple. It was decided that they were colluding in making their deal with Apple and they all had to pay fines.

**Craig:** That’s right. Now, what we’ll see in another topic we’re about to approach is that frankly there is a lot of squidgety dealing going on between what ought to be free and clear competitors in the entertainment business. And I suspect that that’s probably the case here, too. I mean, look, Warner Bros got into it with Amazon. Now Disney gets into it with Amazon. I would be shocked if they hadn’t shared some information. Frankly, the guy that used to run Warner Bros is now running Disney. [laughs] I imagine Alan Horn knows a little something about what happened to Warner Bros. So, anyway, it’ll be interesting to see.

Obviously I root for the studios in this case because the more they get paid for a DVD, the more that you and I get paid for residuals.

**John:** It will also be interesting to see what’s the landscape five years from now. Because if you noticed, Disney has their iPad app now. So, your kid can watch all the Disney movies through the iPad app. And that’s a way for Disney to get around having to deal with retailers. They can be their own retailer.

**Craig:** Yeah. Yeah. Amazon won’t be here forever. That much I know. But things will change. Sears once roamed the earthy like the mighty dinosaur. But, you know, they’re not going to be here forever. And they certainly can’t survive forever as this kind of monopolistic pressuring giant because eventually people just get so angry. And they begin to turn to other things. And as other things become easier and easier to access, they’re going to run into trouble. Plus, they have to make money somehow, right?

I mean, you can’t just keep undercutting everybody.

**John:** Well, but there’s also the aspect that they can just keep growing. And sometimes it’s just being able to keep growing in new directions in new areas is a substitute for actual profits.

**Craig:** That’s right. And, by the way, that’s exactly what they’ve done. I mean, they have been cancerous in their growth, which like cancer, cancer is a very impressive cell. You know, a cancer cell will just go and go and go. But eventually it unfortunately kills the person that it’s growing in. And I’m just kind of curious to see, at some point they’re going to run out of this growth space. These kinds of practices are going to start to alienate the people that support their pipelines of products and content.

I don’t know. I mean, look, they’re going to be around for awhile. Don’t get me wrong. I’m not sitting here saying Amazon is going to be falling apart any day. But they’re starting to act like jerks in a way that companies act about five or ten years before things start getting bad.

**John:** Speaking thematically, I wonder if the truism, the dramatic question and irony that power corrupts ultimately can be played about a corporation. And so the way corporations are people, classically in literature you see someone who rises up and he’s a good noble hero and then there’s a corruption in the third act. You see that in Game of Thrones. You see that in classic mythologies.

I admire Amazon. And I admired Amazon’s arrival Jeff Bezos I think is really, really smart. I admired Google’s beginning. I admire sort of what they were able to achieve. And yet I look at both Amazon and Google and I have concerns about what happens down the road with them.

**Craig:** I think that’s a good point. I mean, when these companies begin they begin as antitheses to what is the standard. They exist in opposition to something and struggle with something. They are in defiance of something. And they grow in that principled way. And they attract people because they’re principled and because they’re saying not “we’re great,” they’re saying “we’re better.”

Right? Everything that you’re used to, these big slow-turning Titanic like giants. We’re better because we’re smarter and we’re new and we’ve figured it out. But eventually they become the big giant. It’s inevitable. And their stance becomes defensive and they’re entirely about stifling what is new because their business model is tied to the infrastructure that they have intertwined with, you know?

**John:** In the Readers United piece they cite George Orwell. And you usually think of 1984 with George Orwell. And in fact Amazon famously a couple years ago pulled 1984 off people’s Kindles because they didn’t actually have the rights to it. And that was a huge brouhaha where like they had literally reached into Kindles and pulled that book back.

But maybe the better analogy is George Orwell’s Animal Farm. Because if you look at the end of Animal Farm, the animals had this revolution and they had all these great ideals and they published their ideas on the barn wall. But ultimately they end up sort of betraying their ideals. And I’ll be curious whether five years, ten years from now we are applying those same lessons to these companies, or companies that I admire like Apple right now. I wonder if we’re going to be seeing that same kind of thing happen.

**Craig:** It’s interesting. Apple for whatever reason, I mean, listen, there’s plenty about Apple to be concerned about and to not like, but there’s a certain rebellious nature to them in some way. Amazon and Google feel — this is all feeling — but they feel like the man right now. They feel like the man. And they feel like the man in part because they’re doing stuff like this.

Apple has always stood apart from all these other businesses because they have made their own software and their own hardware that are meant to work together and that’s it. Right? Microsoft was always about jamming together 4,000 companies worth of tiny bits of plastic to sell to you at a lower price. And, if it works it works. And Apple has always been kind of pure about that sort of thing. Granted, you know, I’m not saying they’re perfect. They are —

**John:** I’m not saying they’re perfect either.

**Craig:** No.

**John:** Another company that has strong ideals is the Weinstein Company.

**Craig:** “Yeah, oh wow man. Thank you. Here. I’m really glad to hear you say that, all right.”

**John:** So, a friend sent a link to this thing which I thought was terrific. So, Charity Buzz is a site that — I would actually encourage everyone to go to Charity Buzz. There are auctions on Charity Buzz and you can win these auctions and sometimes they’re really great experiences. Classically Tim Cook was a person you could have a 30-minute meeting with Tim Cook as a Charity Buzz auction that went for a tremendous amount of money. But even like local schools, like my daughter’s school will have Charity Buzz auctions for things.

We Charity Buzz auctioned backstage at Big Fish.

**Craig:** Cool.

**John:** Well, the Weinstein Company for some charity did a charity auction of an internship, an internship with the Weinstein Company. And you can bid on your chance to become an intern for the Weinsteins.

**Craig:** Oh my god.

**John:** Craig, how much would you pay to be an intern with the Weinsteins.

**Craig:** Oh my god, I suppose I would pay up to negative $100,000. [laughs] I mean, I guess down to negative $100,000.

This is unreal.

**John:** So, the estimated value according to Charity Buzz is $50,000.

**Craig:** Hold on a second.

**John:** Let me read you what actually happened.

**Craig:** Who comes up with that number, by the way?

**John:** It’s the person who is supplying it.

**Craig:** Exactly.

**John:** So here is what you’re getting. “Bid now on a special three-month internship at the Weinstein Company in New York City or Los Angeles.”

**Craig:** “Either city. You can go either New York or Los Angeles. Whatever one you want, man.”

**John:** “And in the department of your choice and learn all the ins and outs of the movie business.” So, a three-month internship with them.

**Craig:** [laughs] That’s it. All of them. All the ins and outs of the movie business, all of them, three months.

**John:** So, this is an unpaid internship.

**Craig:** Yeah. Unpaid.

**John:** Student must be enrolled in college. Intern can receive college credit. Travel accommodations are not included. Start date is TBD and based on a mutually agreed upon time. It’s valid for one semester for US residents only. Cannot be resold or re-auctioned, transferred, and travel accommodations are not included twice.

Troubling, I think, because we’ve talked before on the podcast I think about the challenge of internships. And that unpaid internships tend to favor the wealthy, honestly, or kids who don’t need to work because they can afford not to work.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** But this is sort of a rare case where like you have to pay to have this internship.

**Craig:** Yeah. It’s a little sick. I mean, look, it goes to charity and anything something goes to charity everybody kind of goes, ah, you know, it’s for charity. So, some rich guy wants to set his kid up at the Weinstein Company for three months because he thinks that’s going to help him in the movie business or something. And he wants to pay, I mean, currently at time of recording the current bid is $13,000 after six bids. But we’ll see where it goes.

Okay, fine, you’re going to give a bunch of money to — this supports the American Repertory Theater. Fine. Where’s the harm? Where’s the harm?

Well, you know, here’s the harm. It’s not really harm, it’s just a lack of good. I wish honestly that the Weinstein Company would have said, hey, you’re not going to enjoy a three-month internship. You can enjoy a three-month, I don’t know what you’d call it, like an insider’s look where you can participate or you can sit in on — some promise of doing something other than making copies all day and getting lunches and coffees because your dad paid $40,000. You know what I mean? There has to be… — Look, I did an internship that was when I was a junior in college, that summer after my junior year I did an internship through the Television Academy.

And it was a competition. There wasn’t obviously money involved or anything. It was a competition. And to their credit, they gave you a stipend of $600 a month for two months which was enough to pay my rent. And they placed you with interesting people. And, for instance, I was placed at Fox Broadcasting at the network. And while I often did do things like copy stuff and so on and so forth, I also got to go to the big meeting with Barry Diller and Peter Chernin and Jamie Kellner and watch as these people debated and argued over how they should craft their slate and what the ratings were and all the rest of it. And that was fascinating. And access to that was kind of unimaginable for a 19-year-old kid to have.

This is not going to be that. [laughs] This is not going to be that at all. I mean, look, god bless them for giving this money, but I just think they could have offered something a little better than an internship. First of all, enjoy a three-month internship at the Weinstein Company is like, [laughs], you know, enjoy your nine-month stay here in Abu Ghraib. [laughs]

**John:** Yeah, it feels wrong to me. I think internships are, and we talked about this on the show before. I think internships can be very valuable for the interns. I think they can be valuable for the companies, probably to a lesser degree, but valuable. I think they can be valuable overall for the industry because it’s a chance for people who think they may want to work in the industry to see what the industry is actually like.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** And the people who discover that they love it, hooray, they love it. And they are going to be motivated to work in the industry and the people who discover that they don’t really want it, they can go off and do other things. So, I think it’s a really — internship overall is a really good thing for the industry and for the people involved.

But paying for access to it feels not especially great.

**Craig:** Creepy. Also, look, if you’re a studio and you really are interested in giving people — giving young people a taste of what Hollywood is like and how the business works, don’t do it for people that do this. Do it for, you know, I would have been much happier to see somebody say, hey, you know we’re going to donate money and we’re going to send some kid that doesn’t have access to this kind of thing, who isn’t, whose dad or mom isn’t wealthy.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** Because, I mean, look, the internship thing is out of control. And this leads lovely to our — lovely into our next topic. Loverly.

**John:** Yes. Which is something you had highlighted for this episode which was this revelations that in the bigger Silicon Valley wage suppression lawsuits there was actually stuff that came out about people working in animation.

**Craig:** Right. So, there’s a real problem here. We know that animation, feature animation, is not union. It’s not WGA. I don’t even know if it’s SAG to that extent. There’s a small amount of animation that’s covered by the WGA. That would be some primetime animation like The Simpsons and Family Guy and so forth.

But there’s this case now. They’re calling it the “Techtopus” — as an octopus — Techtopus wage-fixing cartel scandal. And they thought that they had come up with a settlement for this thing and the judge had kind of thrown the settlement out implying this isn’t good enough. And essentially what they’re talking about is the revelation that there has been what these businesses have called a no poaching agreement between the major animation companies. So, we’re talking about DreamWorks, Disney, Pixar, very specifically I think between DreamWorks and Pixar. That was kind of the big one.

And the idea of the no poaching thing wasn’t just, hey, don’t steal our people. It was, hey, don’t offer our people more than we’re offering them, because that’s going to start an arms race where we’re going to offer your people more than you’re offering them. And suddenly, oh my goodness, we’re paying these people according to the principles of competition which of course they love unless it applies to their workers.

And this is not cool. That is not allowable. That’s an illegal cartel. That’s why we have laws about things like that. And this wasn’t even something they were hiding, frankly. They were emailing each other back and forth quite openly and then when Sony started making animated films, and they weren’t aware of this, everybody called them up and they were like, hey Sony, did you not know how this works? We don’t do this, all right?

**John:** [laughs] Yeah, that’s a nice animation studio you got.

**Craig:** Yeah, shame if anything should happen to it. You know, Zemeckis starts up Image Movers and everybody is like, you know, he hires some guy. And pays him a little bit more. And then Ed Catmull at Pixar emails Dick Cook at Disney and goes, ooh, we got a problem with Zemeckis. He don’t get it. [laughs] And it’s just wrong. It’s wrong.

**John:** It is wrong. And so this is talking about animation and classically WGA writers aren’t covered in animation, so it’s been very hard for us to get any sort of leverage in terms of our prices being up. But when you’re talking about specialists who are doing very specific computer animation things, they are really valuable. They can do really amazing things, but their value is not — there’s no free market for them because if there’s only four shops that could pay them and they’ve all agreed not to pay any of them more, then that’s suppressing wages.

**Craig:** No question. And if you think about what we do, how terrible would it be — I mean, this was essentially the system that we as screenwriters got away from in the ’50s and ’60s with what they called the old studio system where you were owned by a studio. And some other studio wanted to hire you and there was kind of a gentleman’s agreement that you wouldn’t do that, or that you would put an actor out on loan as they said. But the idea being that you kind of capped the competition for wages by limiting the opportunity of the people that earned the wages. So, here’s an exchange in his deposition, Ed Catmull of Pixar says the following.

They’re asking him, the plaintiff’s attorneys are saying what do you mean by all these emails where you keep on talking about not hiring other people because of wages. And finally Catmull says, “Well, them hiring a lot of people at much higher salaries would have a negative effect in the long term.”

And the attorney says, “On pay structure?”

And he says, “Well, I’m just saying that if they… — I don’t know what you mean by pay structure. The, for me I just, it means the pay, all right? If the pay goes way up in an industry where the margins are practically nonexistent it will have a negative effect.”

And my favorite thing then is Ed, he finishes saying this and his attorney says the following, “This might be a good time for a break.”

And I can imagine that this woman, his counsel, drags him outside and beats him within an inch of his life for saying this, because it’s basically handing them the truth. But I really want to zero in on this: of course they’re trying to suppress wages, but what I love is this nonsense. “If the pay goes way up in an industry where the margins are practically nonexistent…”

Dude, come on! Come on! That is — why is it that Hollywood gets away with that nonsense more than any other industry. “Oh, we’re not making any money over here. Everything loses money.” Get out of her. Oh, yeah, Frozen, how much did they lose on that? Oh, yeah, Pixar, boy what a string of duds. I mean, come on!

**John:** Yeah. They can barely keep the lights on at Pixar.

**Craig:** Barely. The margins are practically nonexistent. After all of the movies, after all the Toy Stories and the Cars and the merchandising and the Bug’s Life and Up and yada yada, we’ve added it all up and what we’ve made so far here at Pixar is $5.

**John:** Yeah. Pixar apparently in their cereal bar they had to start going to like generic cereals. They can’t afford the brand names anymore.

**Craig:** Oh the humanity. [laughs] I mean, get out of here.

**John:** Craig, this is a very specialized world of the animation films, but I’m wondering to what degree the same kind of thing is happening in our world and it’s sort of the normal future in the television world. Because we are covered by the union, so we have scale. And scale is the minimum people can pay you for things.

**Craig:** Yes.

**John:** And lord knows I was on the negotiating committee. Scale is important and we want to make sure we can protect scale. But I do wonder if these same kinds of conversations are happening that are limiting over-scale opportunities for people in film and in television. It’s the way that you, in television you keep people from moving up from staff writer, to story editor, to producer. Where you just sort of have this tacit agreement like, yeah, yeah, please don’t hire them as something more than their previous thing because we don’t want to give them that bump.

**Craig:** Yeah, no question. They will always, just as water will try an seep through any crack available, the companies will always try and play whatever game they can to reduce their costs, reduce the wages that they pay. They will often do so by wriggling around inside of the rules. Sometimes they bend the rules to the point of stretching them to meaninglessness.

One trick is they’ll hire two writers for television staff but tell them we’re making you a “paper team.” You’re not a writing team, even though you don’t know each other, and you’re not writing together, we’re making you a paper team so that we can pay each of you half what you should be paid, because in a writing team the team gets paid what one writer gets and they have to split it.

Well, I mean, so there’s an example of cheating. What we have to prevent this kind of thing from happening that’s apparently rampant in the animation business, we have the union, and perhaps more importantly we have agents. So, there is this other industry that the studios hate, the talent agencies. And the talent agencies are motivated entirely by creating competition for wages, an upward pressure on wages because that’s how they make their money.

If I were a very talented person working — by the way, I’ve truly put myself on the “will never be hired” list at Pixar now, but okay — if I were a talented animator, storyboard artist/animator, etc, I would start trying to figure out a way to organize and to create a union. They desperately need a union. And then from the union I think the agents would then start to swoop in. Agents need a union. The union makes it so that the writers, the creators, the artists are earning enough to be attractive to agents. Then the agents come in and push it all upward, right, upward.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** So right now they’re being pushed downward without any protection. It’s terrible.

**John:** It’s a frustrating situation. Paper teaming is a real issue that happens in television. And I was just talking with a young writer who got the call saying congratulations you’ve been hired on this one-hour drama, we’re so excited. And then half an hour later he got a call saying like, oh, and we’re going to team you up with this other writer who is also a brand new writer who is great.

And he, to his credit, had the balls to say, “No. That’s not going to happen.”

**Craig:** Good for him. Good for him. And, by the way, you have to. You have to say no.

**John:** Yeah. And so on some level, well, they called his bluff and they gave him the job just for himself. That other writer didn’t get a job, but on the whole I think it’s better for everyone that he stood up and said like, “Listen, I’m not a team. You can’t do that.”

**Craig:** Absolutely. I don’t want a business where they spend the same amount of money but spread it among five times as many people. That’s not the goal.

**John:** Not good for anyone.

**Craig:** No, it’s not good for anyone. Exactly.

**John:** Because you’ve created an unsurvivable job.

**Craig:** That’s right.

**John:** If no one can make a living doing this task, then you’ve made it worse for everyone.

**Craig:** And, boy, I’ll tell you, they are getting dangerously close to that place right now. They really are. Especially in features, it is — don’t get me started.

So, the people in the forum now that are listening to us can ask question live.

**John:** Yes. CD Donovan writes, “Hi John, hi Craig, love the podcast very much. Appreciate what you guys do every week. I just moved here to LA, the third day in Los Angeles now. Here for grad school.”

**Craig:** Welcome, great.

**John:** “Screenwriting at UCLA. Any advice for surviving in LA and making the most of these next two years?”

**Craig:** Oh, that’s good. Well, you know, everyone is different. Everyone’s survival tactics and strategies are different. I can only share with you what mine were. You’re at UCLA, wonderful school, wonderful campus, great part of town in Westwood. Study, obviously study hard. See movies. Get to know people that are in your program. Gravitate towards the people that seem like they are substantive rather than the people who seem popular.

Popular people eventually go on to be like the third guy in charge of development at some company and the substantial people end up being multimillionaires. And the other thing I would recommend is to drink way less than everybody else is and get high way less than everybody else is because it’s just not going to help you.

**John:** You’re here in a graduate screenwriting program, so write. And you should look at these next two years as your writing years. And you’re never going to have another opportunity to write so much, be able to share it with the people in your little group to get feedback, to get going. So, write.

Try to take advantage of the fact that you’re around a bunch of film people to make some movies, because if you are just writing scenes you may not actually get the experience of shooting things and film school is about shooting things. You can crew on some things. You will learn so much from it.

**Craig:** That’s true. Well, we’ve got another question here from Ian Workheiser who says, “What movie or two would you say delivers the best lessons to screenwriters to read the script and watch?” So, I think he means to simultaneously read and watch or watch and then read, etc. What do you think, John?

**John:** I’ve said it many times on the podcast. The first script that I read along with the movie was Steven Soderbergh’s Sex, Lies, and Videotape. And that was — it’s a good movie. It’s a good script. They both work well together.

But I keep coming back to Aliens which was so important and seminal to me where I really could see the movie on the page. And then you watch the movie and it’s like, wow, you did what you promised you would do on the page. So, those are two examples for me.

**Craig:** That’s great. I think I may have mentioned this before. I am a big fan of Jerry Maguire. I think it’s a great example, I think, because Cameron Crowe wrote it and then Cameron Crowe directed it. So, you know that there is a purity of intention from the page to the movie and it’s beautifully done, just beautifully done. And, also, entertaining.

There are movies that are brave, there are movies that are subversive, that shake up the traditional storytelling and they’re wonderful, but when you’re starting out sometimes going down that path is a little bit like just being the punk band in high school that only knows two chords, but hey, it’s punk. Yeah, but also you suck, you know.

But Jerry Maguire is how to do a traditional narrative brilliantly and artistically and impressively. Such a good script. Such a good read. Really well done. So, that’s the one I would recommend.

**John:** Great. Josh Ernstrom writes, “Are there still paper scripts going around, or is it all digital?” It’s almost all digital.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** So, I would say the only times I’ve gotten paper scripts have been something that’s really locked down and so they have it printed on — you cannot photocopy this — it has watermarks. It’s on red pages. But even those are much rarer.

The most extreme example I got was a rewrite on something and they sent it over on a locked down iPad, so it was actually impossible to sort of get it off of the iPad. But it’s essentially all digital now. And I kind of miss, Craig, I don’t know if you miss this, but there used to be a number of years where you would call and say like, “Hey, send a messenger,” and then you would print your script and then inevitably you would like find a typo and you’d be scrambling to fix, get the new page in there before the messenger got there.

**Craig:** I know.

**John:** But there was something actually really refreshing about sort of like you have the script there, it’s sitting on your doorstep, you see the messenger come, and then you’re free. It’s no longer in your possession. And the email just isn’t the same.

**Craig:** Unfortunately the nice things about paper, they are no longer with us. You felt like you had achieved something when you printed your script out for the first time. You could hold it. It looked like a thing that other scripts looked like. There was weight.

But, yeah, the only time you’ll see physical scripts now are at roundtables, as far as I can tell, when people have to sit there and actually — you know, nobody has brought 12 iPads to a table. And for table readings when you’re about to shoot and you have your actors come in and read the script. Other than that, it’s all digital.

**John:** Yeah. Dee Mower writes, “I am close to landing an agent at UTA to rep my screenplay. Assuming he can place, how likely is it that I could get my agent to help me land an assignment based on a pitch? Are such assignments rare?”

**Craig:** An assignment based on a pitch? Or you mean sell a pitch? Oh, I see, he means like — or does he mean an assignment where you’re coming in and pitching on their assignment?

**John:** I think that’s what he means.

**Craig:** Okay. How likely is it that you can get your agent to help you do that? Well, if they’re your agent that’s kind of their job.

**John:** I wonder if he’s talking about the agent is sort of representing the script but hasn’t really agreed to represent him.

**Craig:** Oh I see.

**John:** But there’s a hip pocketing kind of thing.

**Craig:** Yeah. Then probably a long shot there because you can assume that that agent has plenty of other clients who are asking the same thing. Many of whom even have credits. I mean, we’ve talked about this before, but the contraction of both the amount of movies that are made and then the tremendous contraction of the ratio of development to production, which is approaching one-to-one has made it so that there is enormous competition for these rewrite jobs. And a lot of times, frankly, there is no competition. It’s just we want to rewrite this and we want this person to do it.

**John:** But I think he’s really talking more about the open writing assignment. So, how likely is it that they would send him out on an open writing assignment?

**Craig:** It’s not likely, I don’t think.

**John:** I think it’s likely if they really — if they’re really representing you and you are the right kind of person for that job, they totally will.

**Craig:** But if it’s —

**John:** If it’s just a hip pocket, then no.

**Craig:** No. I don’t think so. Yeah. All right, so we’ve got, let’s see. “Hi John and Craig. Can you talk about various writing teachers and gurus hating on VO.”

**John:** Yeah that voiceover problem. So, here’s the thing about voiceover. Voiceover is often terrible. Here’s what it is. Terrible movies often have voiceover. And because terrible movies often have voiceover, you start to believe that, well, voiceover is what made it bad.

No, voiceover was probably a patch applied very late to try to save a bad movie. But voiceover itself is not necessarily a bad thing. There’s many great movies that have voiceover.

**Craig:** Of course.

**John:** So, teachers do it because they don’t want to read voiceover in their student’s scripts, but there’s nothing inherently wrong with the idea of voiceover.

**Craig:** Let me be slightly less charitable, John. Writing teachers and gurus say this because they’re dumb. And they’re dumb and lazy. Okay, they’re dumb because they’re confusing — John is exactly right. Voiceover is a tool like any other. It happens to be the kind of tool that magnifies bad writing. Because there’s something about the narrator’s voice that demands a certain quality of writing. If you’re going to tell me that I’m supposed to listen to a disembodied voice, that disembodied voice better be pretty impressive. It should be good, right?

So, even a movie, like a broad comedy like Ted opens with voiceover. Patrick Stewart is doing the voiceover and it’s wonderful voiceover. It’s spectacular. And it ends with a great joke that honestly makes the movie work, right? But as a tool if you don’t write well, your voiceover will really stick out as awful.

So, on the one hand I think the writing teachers and gurus are dumb because they’re confusing voiceover with bad voiceover, but I think they’re lazy also because what they don’t want to do is then explain to you how to write good voiceover. And they can’t do that because they don’t know how. That’s the truth. They just don’t know how.

I think voiceover can be awesome — awesome! — if done awesomely. What a shock. What a shock. Eh.

**John:** Yes.

**Craig:** There I go. There I go.

**John:** If this were a podcast about cinematography and one of the things like teachers said like you should never use lenses below a 15 because it’s distorting, well that’s just crazy talk.

**Craig:** It’s crazy.

**John:** Because obviously there are times where you want to use a really wide lens.

**Craig:** Right. You want a fish shot. Yeah.

**John:** It’s a very long lens.

**Craig:** You want to do a fisheye lens. They’re instruments. And, yes, it’s true that there are things that people know can be overdone, of course. And if you overuse slow-mo you’re going to look silly. And if you overuse dialogue, long speeches of dialogue. But, you know, voiceover is such a — here’s the deal. These people are always looking for rules to give you because that’s what gives them the aura of knowledge. They are able to deliver something to you in exchange for money. That’s the real problem here. You’re paying them and they need to give you something.

If you pay me, here’s what I’m going to give you. You shouldn’t have paid me, because the truth is you can do this or you can’t do this. I can give you some help here or there, right? But really you don’t need to pay me. But they need to give you something, right, because they’re ripping you off. So, what do they do? They give you nonsense rules. “Never use voiceover. Never say we see. Don’t put things in parentheses. Never tell the reader where the camera goes.” Blah, blah, blah.

It’s all nonsense. Nonsense. Oh my god! [laughs]

**John:** The people who joined us for the live chat were mostly joining for that umbrage. So thank you for giving it to them Craig.

**Craig:** Woo-hoo.

**John:** I think it’s time for One Cool Things.

**Craig:** All right.

**John:** My One Cool Thing is a podcast called Crew Call by Anonymous Production Assistant. And the reason I found out about this podcast is because Stuart Friedel, my assistant, the producer of this podcast, was actually a guest on this podcast.

**Craig:** [laughs] Wait, I’m sorry, what?

**John:** Stuart was a guest.

**Craig:** Oh my god.

**John:** One of the Stuarts was a guest.

**Craig:** The world is changing so rapidly. I can’t keep up with the world anymore. Unbelievable. Good for Stuart.

**John:** Unbelievable.

**Craig:** God, amazing.

**John:** So, honestly what I like about the podcast is we talk about people who work in other parts of the industry, this is about people who work in other crew positions and who are so incredibly vital. So, to have a podcast for people who are interested in all of the other crafts and trades that go into making film and television I think is incredibly important.

**Craig:** It’s spectacular.

**John:** So, I salute this podcast. And Stuart’s episode is terrific, too. So, you can listen to that. He talks about making Scriptnotes and what he does on the show and running out and getting me coffee. And he only embarrasses me two or three times, so it’s pretty cool.

**Craig:** Oh, that’s wonderful. Oh, only two or three? Was I embarrassed at all? Because you know I don’t listen to podcast so I would never —

**John:** No, you weren’t embarrassed at all. He doesn’t say anything about you.

**Craig:** Oh, good. I prefer to be ignored.

Well, how could my One Cool Thing this week not be Robin Williams, the great Robin Williams who tragically took his own life. And this one — this was a hard one because it not only was tragic in and of itself because any suicide is tragic and because the suicide of a terrific artist sort of robs us all of something.

But he was really the first comedian in my life, you know. For those of us who are in our early 40s, Mork & Mindy came along and Mork from Ork came along and I wore the rainbow suspenders and he was that first, I know — [laughs]

**John:** I’m just picturing Craig with his rainbow suspenders. It’s great.

**Craig:** it’s adorable. It’s adorable. What I did not know were my gay pride rainbow suspenders. But he was the first standup comedian in my life and he was amazing and wonderful. And what I also — personally what I always appreciated about Robin Williams was the very thing that he often got criticized for, which was his sentimentality.

You could tell that he was very aware of his own pain and the pain of the world. He had an almost direct access to it, an emotional access to it. And he was able to convey that. And, yes, if sometimes some of the movies felt overtly sentimental or mawkish, it’s because sometimes life is a bit sentimental and mawkish.

Go to a funeral and see if you’re not sentimental and mawkish, but that’s part of life. And if it’s honest, I think it can be beautiful. And he sort of ran the gamut from the ridiculous to the gorgeous to the subtle to the dramatic. He could do anything.

Personally, my favorite Robin Williams movie is Awakenings. Maybe because I was a premed kid on his way to being a neurologist and I loved Oliver Sacks and all that. But I just though how amazing that this guy who could be Mork from Ork and who could do those incredible live performances where he would just go and go and never stop. And his mind would move a thousand miles a minute, to go from that to holding his own completely with Robert De Niro and delivering this beautiful portrait. And, a kind of character I always appreciate. A character in a movie who is the hero even though you don’t know he’s the hero.

You know, you think you’re watching a movie about a man overcoming this affliction, but you’re watching a movie about a human being figuring out how to be human. And he was just unbelievable. And, folks, go hug a funny person, you know.

This is — it’s sad. What funny people often do carry around this terrible hurt. And he will be terribly, terribly missed. A great, great, great performer and artist, the late Robin Williams.

**John:** I completely agree. So, by the time this podcast comes out it’ll be nearly a week that the news has past. And I hope that one of the things we take with us out of his passing is not just his legacy of great work and all that stuff we have there, but the real lesson of what depression is and that it’s a rough thing to struggle with. And if people can be more appreciative of what it is and the challenges people face when they are dealing with depression, hopefully we can help the people around us.

**Craig:** No question. No question. I had a friend recently who went through a really rough patch and, you know, got a little close to this situation. And suicidality and suicidal ideation is a very, very serious thing. And I think, frankly, people are starting to get it. I really do.

I think people are starting to get, the stigma is going away. I think the casual dismissal of depression is something that weak whiners do is going away. I think people are starting to get it. I can’t imagine, in a weird way, anything you could do that’s braver or stronger than harming yourself. Think about just what it would take to harm yourself. What you’re really saying is I’m in so much pain I’m willing to do this extraordinary thing to make the pain go away.

But, of course, there is a wonderful way to make the pain go away that has nothing to do with suicide and that gives you your life back. And I suppose that is really the strongest thing you could do, which is to fight. And to fight through it. And there are terrific medications that do work and there is therapy that does work and there are people that care for you that do very much understand this and who have been through it.

So, if you are depressed, do not be ashamed. Talk about it. You are not weak.

**John:** Yeah, if anything, if the shame of depression can be diminished through the acknowledgment that it really is out there and it’s a real thing that people are wrestling with on a daily basis, that would be progress.

**Craig:** It would. And it’s sad that it would take something like this to bring people’s awareness to it, but this is a problem that so many people are suffering with. They’re suffering with it silently. You don’t even know what’s going on. This is why we get surprised by these things. But I defy anybody — anybody in the United States — to say, no, there’s nobody in my extended family that has either been depressed or committed suicide. I don’t have a friend or anybody.

No.

**John:** No, not true.

**Craig:** No. It’s everywhere and it can be fought and it can be overcome. And I think at long last people are taking it very seriously. And, frankly, honoring what it means to be depressed. It deserves a certain amount of honor and respect as something very serious the way you honor and respect heart disease, or cancer, or anything like that.

**John:** That’s our show this week. The things we talked about on the episode, there will be show notes at johnaugust.com, so links to many of the things we talked about. We’ll include some links about depression and people who’ve written brilliant things about their own depression over the course of this last week. But also the Weinsteins Charity Buzz.

**Craig:** [laughs] Talk about depression.

**John:** An Amazon and everything else in this epic episode we did this week.

**Craig:** Yes.

**John:** Thank you to everybody who listened in live on Mixlr. That was fun.

**Craig:** That was fun.

**John:** We’ll try to do this occasionally.

Scriptnotes is produced by Stuart Friedel. It is edited by Matthew Chilelli. If you are a new listener and want to catch up on back episodes, we have a whole zillion of them. We have 156 prior episodes at scriptnotes.net. You can get to all of those back episodes for $1.99 a month.

**Craig:** $1.99 a month!

**John:** That’s a bargain at any price. You can spend $13,000 on a Weinstein Charity Buzz auction, or $1.99 a month.

**Craig:** $1.99 a month!

**John:** Pennies a day.

**Craig:** Pennies!

**John:** If you are a subscriber to those premium episodes, you can also listen to those on the iPhone app and the Android app. Look for those in your app store.

If you are on iTunes, please click subscribe and also leave us a comment because that helps people find our show. There is potential that we are going to be doing a live show later this fall.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** So nothing official yet, but maybe stay in Los Angeles is all I’m saying. Maybe stay in Los Angeles from now until the end of the year.

**Craig:** Yeah, just don’t go anywhere, at any time.

**John:** There’s a possibility, just in case.

**Craig:** Don’t go anywhere.

**John:** No. I am on Twitter @johnaugust. Craig is @clmazin. If you have a longer question for us, you can write to ask@johnaugust.com. And, Craig, I’ll see you next week.

**Craig:** See you next week, buddy.

Links:

* This episode was broadcast live [on Mixlr](http://mixlr.com/scriptnotes/)
* Come see Scriptnotes live with John and Kelly at the [Austin Film Festival](http://www.austinfilmfestival.com/)
* Brian Koppelman’s The Moment Podcast [with guest Craig Mazin](http://grantland.com/hollywood-prospectus/the-moment-podcast-brian-koppelman-and-craig-mazin/)
* [Sparknotes: Goodnight Moon](http://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/sparknotes-goodnight-moon) on McSweeney’s
* Slate on [How Gobbledygook Ended Up in Respected Scientific Journals](http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2014/02/27/how_nonsense_papers_ended_up_in_respected_scientific_journals.html)
* Christopher Wright [on Amazon vs Hachette](https://www.eviscerati.org/articles/2014/08/Amazon-v-Hatchette-Everyone-Wrong-Me), and Dave Bryant’s follow up [on the true costs of publishing a book](http://dave-bryant.livejournal.com/21544.html)
* John’s blog post on how [no one cares about manufacturing costs](http://johnaugust.com/2014/no-one-cares-about-manufacturing-costs)
* LA Times on [Amazon vs Disney](http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-amazon-disney-20140811-story.html)
* The Weinstein Company is [auctioning off an internship for charity](https://www.charitybuzz.com/catalog_items/597305)
* [Court docs show role of Pixar and Dreamworks Animation in Silicon Valley wage-fixing cartel](http://pando.com/2014/07/07/revealed-court-docs-show-role-of-pixar-and-dreamworks-animation-in-silicon-valley-wage-fixing-cartel/)
* The Anonymous Production Assistant’s Crew Call Podcast [with guest Stuart Friedel](http://www.anonymousproductionassistant.com/2014/07/31/personal-assistant-stuart-friedel/)
* Robin Williams’s obituary from [The New York Times](http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/12/movies/robin-williams-oscar-winning-comedian-dies-at-63.html?_r=0)
* The [National Suicide Prevention Lifeline](http://www.suicidepreventionlifeline.org/) and [National Alliance on Mental Illness](http://www.nami.org/)
* [Outro](http://johnaugust.com/2013/scriptnotes-the-outros) by Scriptnotes listener Brian Shane ([send us yours!](http://johnaugust.com/2014/outros-needed))

Scriptnotes, Ep 157: Threshers, Mergers and the Top Two Boxes — Transcript

August 15, 2014 Scriptnotes Transcript

The original post for this episode can be found [here](http://johnaugust.com/2014/threshers-mergers-and-the-top-two-boxes).

**John August:** Guten Tag and willkommen. My name is John August.

**Craig Mazin:** My name is Craig Mazin.

**John:** And this is Episode 157 of Scriptnotes, a podcast about screenwriting and things that are interesting to screenwriters.

I made a game time decision there. I was going to try to do the whole thing in German and I just couldn’t possibly do it. It was going to be brutal.

**Craig:** I decided just to do my name the normal way this time.

**John:** Yeah, which is good. That’s how Craig normally speaks. And so if you’re in one of those podcasting apps where you speed things up or slow things down, you might not be used to Craig’s normal voice. But that’s Craig’s normal voice.

**Craig:** Yeah. It was a little bit of a learning curve for me to speak this ridiculously quickly, but you had asked when we started.

**John:** Yeah. Well, because I’m a very fast talker. And it would have just been weird if you spoke the way you usually speak.

**Craig:** Have you ever listened to Dan Petrie, Jr. speak?

**John:** No, I haven’t.

**Craig:** So, I love Dan. He’s the greatest guy. For those of you who don’t know, he wrote Beverly Hills Cop. He also was the president of the Writers Guild multiple times.

**John:** Yes.

**Craig:** And awesome guy, but notoriously slow speaker, and with these incredibly long pauses known at the Petrie Pause. So, give me a simple thing to say and I’ll translate it into Petrie.

**John:** There is no toothpaste left in the tube.

**Craig:** Uh, there is…uh…No…toothpaste…uh…uh…left in…uh…the tube.

**John:** And you are throwing a little slice of Christopher Walken in there, too. That sense of like —

**Craig:** “Uh…’

**John:** That’s great.

**Craig:** Yeah, he’ll do it. Now, and imagine Dan Petrie running the board meeting, running the Writers Guild Board Meeting. They were long meetings.

**John:** Yes.

**Craig:** Uh…uh…[laughs]…uh….

**John:** Oh no. I would not have done well with that.

**Craig:** No, but you sound pretty good to me now. For those people who are wondering, you’ve been away. You were Germany and Austria, correct?

**John:** Both, yes.

**Craig:** So, sort of following the path of the Anschluss east, yes.

**John:** So, I’ve been back in Los Angeles for about 12 hours. I’m completely, wildly jet-lagged, but holding up okay. You have already been to Austria. You asked people on the podcast about a year ago maybe saying like, hey, I’m going to Austria, point me to cool things, and they did. And then I took some of the same recommendations and went back to Austria and Berlin, both of which I just highly, highly recommend.

**Craig:** Yes. I still haven’t been to Berlin, but Austria, quite beautiful. You’re just soaking in history everywhere you turn. It’s pretty remarkable. And then you also made it over to Salzburg.

**John:** Yes, and Salzburg was great. So, we did Berlin, Salzburg, drove across the country to Vienna, then flew back. And just loved it, great, the whole time threw.

**Craig:** Spectacular.

**John:** So last week was a rerun. This week we are back, real live, with a new show. And we have new things to talk about.

**Craig:** So much. So much to talk about.

**John:** Some suggestions from Twitter which we would have gotten to anyway, but thank you again for people who suggested topics on Twitter. We want to talk about True Detective and the accusations of plagiarism surrounding that. And really what does plagiarism even mean when you’re talking about a feature film or a television series.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** We’re going to talk about test screenings, and dealing with test screenings, and a writer’s function in a test screening. We need to talk about the majors, and what we mean when we say the majors in terms of studios, because with talk of consolidation it’s a real question of what is a major in 2014.

And finally we’re going to talk about the Canadian “about.” There was a great article I found which was going to be my One Cool Thing, but I think it’s actually worth a bigger discussion. Sometimes we make fun of how Canadians pronounce “about,” but there’s a really great post that explains sort of why that word is that way and why we tend to miss hear what they’re actually saying.

**Craig:** Huh. All right. Well, I’m suspicious, but open minded.

**John:** But you’ll love it. So, let’s get started. First off is True Detective, which is a show we talked about on the podcast previously because we both loved it.

**Craig:** Love.

**John:** Loved that show. And so this last week accusations came out and they sort of existed before this but there was a blog post that sort of summarized all the accusations that Nic Pizzolatto who created True Detective, and specifically in the character of Rust Cohle, which Matthew McConaughey plays, that some of what is sort of iconic about things that Matthew McConaughey’s character says are derived from work by a writer named Thomas Ligotti who I don’t know from before. But a writer who writes in sort of the weird science fiction Lovecraftian sort of sense.

And so this original blog post, there will be a link to that, shows examples of dialogue and then the original text from Ligotti’s work that sometimes seem like paraphrasing or closely match.

**Craig:** Mm-hmm. Yeah, that’s right. So, first things first, and just to be clear, this was sort of brought up — I guess this was initially brought up by a guy named Jon Padgett who is a — well, there’s two guys, Mike Davis who is writing for the Lovecraft E-Zine I guess, and then he was contacted by a guy named Jon Padgett who is the founder of the website Thomas Ligotti Online, which I suspect is about Thomas Ligotti.

**John:** It is about Thomas Ligotti.

**Craig:** And it’s not about Thomas Ligotti online.

**John:** No, it’s about the work, not about his online presence.

**Craig:** It’s not about what he does online.

**John:** Wouldn’t it be great if it were a meta site about Thomas Ligotti’s site.

**Craig:** Exactly.

**John:** That would be kind of great.

**Craig:** But then of course you probably reasonably be accused of plagiarism there. So, plagiarism, let’s first of all — I think you’re very smart to ask what does that even mean. And I know what I think it means. I’m kind of curious what you think it means.

**John:** So, to me plagiarism means trying to pass off someone else’s work as your own work. So, it’s intellectual dishonesty and trying to say that you created something that somebody else created. I think an important distinction we’re going to want to make at the start here is the difference between plagiarism and copyright infringement, because they can be — sometimes you can have both, but they’re not necessarily the same thing. Craig?

**Craig:** That’s right. Plagiarism isn’t a crime in the sense that copyright infringement is a crime. It’s against the law. There’s no law about plagiarism. Plagiarism to me has always been — I think your definition works very well. It’s a moral crime.

**John:** It’s an ethical crime.

**Craig:** Right. The difference between plagiarism and copyright infringement is a bit like the difference between harassing someone, being charged with harassment, or just being a jerk. It’s not nice to be a jerk, but it doesn’t necessarily mean that you’ve broken a law. Plagiarism may not life other works in such a specific way that it rises to the test of infringement, however we can say, look, you did in fact take so much without attribution and pass it off as your own that you are essentially committing a moral crime.

**John:** Yes.

**Craig:** The question at hand is that what Pizzolatto did?

**John:** And so it’s interesting when we talk about plagiarism, I think about it in generally two contexts: journalism and academia, sort of writing in those two fields. You can do plagiarism in other ways, too, but those are the two areas in which you sort of see plagiarism brought up. So, you’re writing a research paper, you did not properly footnote your sources. You paraphrase something without sort of giving it attribution.

In the case of journalism, there’s great cases. The Shattered Glass case, which is basically a guy who took a bunch of written material from other writers —

**Craig:** Actually, Shattered Glass, he invented things. That was his big problem, yeah.

**John:** That’s right. It was Jayson Blair who was the one who was fabricating stuff.

**Craig:** I think he also — his crime was fabulism, was just making stuff up that wasn’t true. Direct plagiarism, well, you know, Joe Biden sort of had this very infamous moment when he was first running for president way back when. That was essentially plagiarism. He stole a Neil Kinnock speech I believe.

**John:** And it’s become easier in some cases to detect plagiarism because we have software tools now that can look through and say like you actually copied these phrases from these things. And there’s — in the literary world you can also see things, like there’s several of these articles brought up this book, How Opal Mehta Got Kissed, Got Wild, and Got a Life, and that was a book that was actually published and then it was revealed that giant chunks had come from other books and they pulled it off the shelves. It was a big scandal.

What I found so interesting about this accusation with plagiarism and True Detective is I’m not even sure what it means, or that you can even ascribe the same kind of test to a filmed piece of entertainment the way you could to a written report that is handed in or a news story that’s in the New York Times.

It feels weird how — basically your defense against plagiarism is generally that you’re attributing your sources. And so you’re saying like, “Said this person,” or you’re putting in a footnote or you’re sort of saying where that stuff came from.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** Let’s say hypothetically Pizzolatto had used these things from Thomas Ligotti. How was he supposed to attribute those in a way that was meaningful, that gave credit to Ligotti?

**Craig:** Right. Okay, so correct in suggesting that plagiarism is a far more serious charge when you’re dealing with journalism. Even if you’re dealing with silly journalism. I mean, there was a recent uproar over a guy that wrote Buzz Feed Listicles, which are in the grand scheme of things completely insubstantial and insignificant. And yet he was plagiarizing. And they caught him. They caught him red-handed. And he plagiarized a lot.

And that is a more serious issue because journalism is purporting to express original, particularly original thoughts or commentary on things. We understand in entertainment there is to some extent when people say everything is a remix, we understand what that means. There are certain plots that get rehashed over and over. Drama gets rehashed over and over. We see the same kinds of characters. We know that movies sometimes seem just like other movies.

All of that is true. But, you ask an interesting question. What was he supposed to do? Before we talk about what he was supposed to do, let’s talk about what he did.

Because in this case I have to say I am uncomfortable with what he did. I am a little uncomfortable. Is it plagiarism? I don’t know. Because, again, very fuzzy term. But I’m a little uncomfortable and in a sense I’m uncomfortable because it’s not copyright infringement. When you see something that isn’t copyright infringement but looks a whole lot like something else, in and of itself that is a kind of evidence that there was a stealing, because there is a an attempt to cover ones tracks.

So, for instance, Pizzolatto writes through Rust Cohle, “There is no point. Nowhere to go. No one to see. Nothing to do. Nothing to be.”

Now, here are some lines from Ligotti: “Without the ever clanking machinery of emotion, everything would come to a standstill. There would be nothing to do. Nowhere to go. Nothing to be. And no one to know.”

Now, slightly different. [laughs] Ever so slightly different. Different enough, one supposes perhaps, to not be. But pretty damn close.

Now, let’s acknowledge that he’s, okay, so he’s gone ahead, he’s read that, it’s influenced him, and he’s now using that work to — Cohle is sort of channeling what this guy wrote. In and of itself you do that once or twice, I don’t even think that’s a problem at all. My concern is that there is an enormous — it seems like there’s an enormous reliance on one author’s expression over and over for one character and that character is so closely associated to you, the person who is borrowing, That’s the part that concerns me here.

**John:** So, Craig, I worry that you’re falling into some silent evidence issues here, because obviously these blog posts they’re citing all these examples of Rust Cohle’s speeches that involve elements of things he said. But for all we know, maybe he has 10,000 lines over the course of these eight episodes. That may be 1% of the lines he says are influenced by this. And there may be other, Nietzsche and other sot of writers who are also influencing, of reliance throughout those things, so you’re not seeing that.

Basically I’m saying if you saw the comprehensive list of every line of dialogue he said, and in cases where you could attribute it to being influenced by the writers of one of these other writers, I’m not even sure Ligotti would be in the top percentage of things that he’s saying, or at least the notable things that he’s saying.

**Craig:** Um, you might be right. You might be right. I think that there’s a difference between repackaging ideas though unique dialogue and repackaging ideas though non-unique dialogue. That’s the part that concerns me a little bit. And more to the point, through non-unique dialogue that isn’t in the public domain like Nietzsche, or Shakespeare, or the bible, but rather is the work of another author who has not only legal rights but more importantly to this case certain — just an inherent ethical right to his own work.

I am uncomfortable with this. I don’t think Nic Pizzolatto is a plagiarist, however, I think that he failed to appropriately acknowledge somebody that was a clear influence on a character for which Nic Pizzolatto up to this point has received total credit.

**John:** So, let’s say that you’re right, and let’s say that — it’s making you uncomfortable and you think that more attribution should be given, more credit should be given to this other writer. How would you do that? What would be ways that you could do that? If you were Pizzolatto, how would you reflect that?

Would it be something you’d put in the script? Is it something you say in interviews? What would you do?

**Craig:** Well, frankly, if I were — let’s put aside am I Pizzolatto. Let me say I’m a producer on this and I’m aware that the writer is being influenced to this extent by another writer’s work that is not in the public domain, I would suggest that you go and get the rights to that thing. That you cover your tracks there and that this person is fairly compensated and has the right to essentially be compensated for their contribution, which is seemingly a very real contribution from what I can read. That, to me, would be a fair thing.

If you don’t feel it rises to the test of that, then I just think as Pizzolatto had acknowledged, was it the Yellow King, that whole work, acknowledged it early on as an influence, he could have acknowledged this as an influence. I am concerned that he didn’t because maybe he was aware that some of this stuff had crossed the line from influence to kind of lifting.

**John:** Yes. I think that’s a lot of speculation. Because we don’t know all the interviews he did. We don’t know sort of when he talked about what things. All we know about what Pizzolatto said about Ligotti’s work and other things comes from there’s a Wall Street Journal interview where he talked at length about sort of Pizzolatto and this specific book and things like that.

But for all we know, he could have been talking about that during all the lead up into the debut of the show.

**Craig:** It doesn’t appear that that’s the case.

**John:** It doesn’t appear that that’s the case. But, again, we have no evidence that he has done it, but we have no evidence that he was trying to cover anything up. So, all we’re seeing is based on dates of when things got published, this is when he started talking about and started acknowledging that this was one of his influences in the piece.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** I want to go back to a thing that was in the original blog post between Mike Davis and Jon Padgett. They were saying that — I should also stress that the original author, Thomas Ligotti, he’s not the person who seems to be upset about this. He’s not the person who is talking to the press about this. It’s really this online site that’s doing that.

They said, well, he should have gone to Ligotti and gotten his blessing or his permission, or sort of gotten his okay to do it. And that’s a weird thing to say when you’re giving charges of plagiarism because that’s never been a requirement of using work in terms of plagiarism. Plagiarism is about not attributing things. So, imagine if you were a journalist and you had to get permission to quote somebody. That would be ridiculous.

**Craig:** Oh, no. Quotes are a totally different deal. We don’t own the rights to what we say. If a reporter calls me and I say something to him, it’s not in fixed form. And so there is no right or anything there. They can attribute it to me and if I challenge them on it they can just say, no, I took my notes and you did it. And that happens all the time.

This is a published work and there are specific lines in fixed form that are unique expressions and they have been — again, I don’t think that this is, certainly it’s not copyright infringement, but there are moments where it feels… — Here’s the thing: look, I don’t think that Nic Pizzolatto is a plagiarist. I think that the — I don’t think the umbrage that they have taken here is appropriate for what has occurred.

However, Nic Pizzolatto received a ton of praise not only all of the non-Rust Cohle dialogue aspects of the show, which are brilliant, but also in part for Rust Cohle’s dramatic philosophy. His nihilistic philosophy. The tenets of the philosophy have existed long before Mr. Ligotti and Mr. Pizzolatto. But the phrasing of the philosophy at times is very much Ligotti’s and I think that maybe there is something a little unfair about doing something like that knowing full well that you’re getting credit for it while somebody else isn’t at all.

**John:** Yeah. Okay, a couple of ways to sort of pull this apart. Let’s talk about it from the writing perspective and look at things that if Pizzolatto had done it a certain way in the writing we might not have had these issues come up. It could have actually hurt the writing, but we could at least talk about it. One thing I think would never have worked would be some sort of footnote. So, their suggestion is like, oh, if you just footnoted things the way you would in a research paper that would show where it came from.

Well, that’s not helpful because —

**Craig:** No.

**John:** Obviously what we’re filming is not the actual text that’s written there on the page.

**Craig:** That’s right.

**John:** So that is not going to be a useful thing. Rust Cohle could have said, “Have you ever read the work of Thomas Ligotti. Ligotti would say….” It could be some more artful way of actually putting Ligotti’s name out there in the context of that dialogue.

**Craig:** I don’t think that’s required. I don’t want my character having to make citations like that.

**John:** I don’t want that to have to happen either.

**Craig:** But I do think that certainly in the press notes for the show, the easiest thing would have been to say a lot of this character was influenced by the following: Nietzsche….Schopenhauer…the work of Thomas Ligotti, just to say, “Hey, I’m not trying to pull a fast one here.” When Rust Cohle says, “I think about the hubris it must take to yank a soul out of non-existence into this meat, force a life into this thresher,” that is a very specific expression. I’m listening to them thinking who is the guy — who wrote that? Nic Pizzolatto? Who is this guy? That’s amazing. Except that somebody else before him wrote, “We are meat. Why should generations unborn be spared entry into the human thresher? Every one of us, haven been stolen from non-existence, are being readied for the meat grinder of existence.”

Well, you see what I’m saying?

**John:** Absolutely. I totally see what you’re saying. And I think I’m uncomfortable in the same ways. What I would challenge though in your suggestion of in the press notes he should have called out Ligotti, that’s after the fact and that’s actually something that’s not necessarily possible for every writer to do. Every writer doesn’t get the chance to sort of go through and do the press notes on things and say like, “This is where stuff comes from.”

Yeah, it doesn’t take away the plagiarism aspects of it, because the actual text is what is being accused.

**Craig:** Even if you don’t have access to press notes, or anything like that, you have — everybody now more than ever can go on record publicly in the widest forum possible and say, “Hey, this was something that influenced me. If you guys like the way Rust Cohle talks, check out this book by Thomas Ligotti.” Because it’s not all of it, but it’s clearly some of it. And I don’t like the fact that I think I’m appreciating the expression of one person when I’m actually appreciating the expression of another, or at least their combined expression. You know what I mean?

**John:** I do know what you mean. I think the other challenge we’re facing here with Ligotti is Ligotti is largely unknown to most people. And so because he was an obscure person that no one was familiar with his words ahead of time, nobody knew that he was being quoted. When you quote Shakespeare, when you quote Nietzsche, when you quote those things, that’s free. I mean, basically, not only is it public domain but people know what it is.

You can even — you can quote things from other movies that’s fine because everyone knows what the reference is.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** My worry is that if we go too far down this path of sort of, the suggestion that you actually need to go get the rights to this underlying work, to Ligotti’s work in order to be able to make this Rust Cohle character, then we’re just going to be paralyzed and you can be paranoid that anything — any philosophy that a character speaks, wow, did someone else say that first?

I just worry that we’re going to get into the problem that rap ran into with sampling, or sort of —

**Craig:** Well, but hold on a second. Rap ran into that problem and then they had to solve it. Because it was a problem. And now people get paid. I mean, you can’t lift chunks of other people’s stuff and put it out there as our own and then expect that you don’t have to pay them.

**John:** But I think that’s a copyright infringement problem. You are literally taking a copyrighted material that you can clearly define, like I’m taking the actual audio of what you’re doing and reusing it. Versus the other musical example is like you can’t copyright a chord progression.

**Craig:** Right. That’s right.

**John:** A chord progression is a general statement of philosophy. And so I worry that you could draw the lines so narrowly that… — Listen, we can all, you know, we can have the full text of every movie ever spoken. So, I’ll bet in almost any movie you could find those lines of dialogue written in other movies. I just worry that it’s going to become paralyzing and that we’re not going to make bold choices because of worries about this kind of accusation after the fact.

**Craig:** It’s good to have —

**John:** I’m already a little nervous about that. You read a script that I wrote that I was clearly relying on this recognition of a certain cultural icon without being part of that cultural icon and that’s frustrating.

**Craig:** But it’s different. To me we know that parody and reference is acceptable. We even, I mean, everybody knows that Tarantino pastiches together god knows how many little bits and bobs from other movies he’s seen that maybe we haven’t seen. So, yes, he’s not the first person to have someone jab a needle into someone’s heart to revive them. But that to me, all that stuff is great and wonderful. And when Tarantino then says, “Oh yeah, that’s from this movie,” it’s not like he’s hiding it because it’s a movie. It exists and people know about it. And that’s all fine.

I don’t want to touch any of that. Nor do I want to suggest that you have to buy underlying properties because you’re expressing a similar philosophy or idea. I’m talking about what the — when you get down to brass tax, the specific arrangement of words. We are writers. That matters. And if you are specifically doing it with one person’s unread work that nobody knows about, and you’re pulling out repeatedly arrangements of words and then having your character say them in not exactly but just a little sideways, almost as if to say, “See, it’s not exactly the same.” That is concerning to me. And there has to be some line of concern, otherwise at some point people could just start lifting scenes, or lifting direct sentences. At some point there has to be something.

I guess my point is this: I’m not uncomfortable with Nic Pizzolatto did vis-‡-vis the work of Mr. Ligotti. I am uncomfortable with the silence that he maintained up until this point. And even now — now of course you can tell that he and HBO are in a legal defensive posture. But in a way I think there was information withheld because it was maybe a little inconvenient. And that’s the part that I’m uncomfortable with. And I’m happy to be wrong about this. Very happy to be wrong.

I hope that Ligotti comes out and says, “Hey, everyone relax. He called me. He loved my book. He loves my stuff. We had a conversation. I was like totally cool with him. Kind of building this character a little bit around some of the, you know, key phrases that I’ve used in my books to express this philosophy.” If that happens, I’m thrilled.

I don’t care about the business being restrained or any of that stuff. I more care about Thomas Ligotti and just making sure that he didn’t get kind of wronged in a moral way.

**John:** I get that as well. And so I think I’m uncomfortable with sort of how specific some of the sentences were in that comparison and when you bring up that thresher thing, yes, I think that’s a lesson for all writers to look at is like, wow, that’s a really great sentence and it’s not your sentence. And so the challenge is then to write your own sentence that is as great as that sentence and will be terrific.

And that truly is a challenge. I would also stress though that we have to always remember that writing a script and putting something up on the screen is a long process. It involves a lot of different people. So, even if you had the best of intention about sort of how you’re going to site, or sort of like how you’re going to include that author — my sort of ham-fisted example is sort of like how you have Rust Cohle say, “Thomas Ligotti, blah, blah, blah, blah,” through the process that stuff could drop away.

And so you could be facing a situation where in the edit something goes away that was kind of protecting you intellectually and morally and ethically about how you were using that preexisting work. And that can be a real challenge.

**Craig:** That can be a challenge. I will say, by the way, that if Pizzolatto had a Thomas Ligotti book on a shelf in Rust Cohle’s apartment, the debate is over. He’s acknowledged. I think what’s uncomfortable here is that it seemed like he was trying to maybe pull a fast one on us. That’s the part that makes me uncomfortable.

**John:** And I’m not willing to go there. I don’t think there was that intention.

**Craig:** I hope there wasn’t.

**John:** I think there wasn’t. So, we should say just for the record, this was as we’re recording this, the Pizzolatto statement that came out from HBO is quote, “Nothing in the television show True Detective was plagiarized. The philosophical thoughts expressed by Rust Cohle do not represent any thought or idea unique to any one author. Rather, these are the philosophical tenets of a pessimistic, anti-natalist philosophy with an historic tradition including Arthur Schopenhauer, Friedrich Nietzsche, E.M. Cioran, and various other philosophers, all of whom express these ideas. As an autodidact pessimist, Cohle speaks toward that philosophy with erudition and in his own words. The ideas within this philosophy are certainly not exclusive to any writer.”

**Craig:** Yeah. A lawyer wrote that. He’s not writing that. That’s a lawyer.

**John:** That’s a lawyer.

**Craig:** That’s such a lawyer covering his butt now. I mean, I have a feeling that there’s a far more interesting defense but he’s not allowed to make it because now the lawyers are like, okay, shutting everything down. Too much money at stake here. And I get that.

**John:** You get that.

**Craig:** Yeah, totally. That’s the way you got to do it.

**John:** So, on the topic of lawyers, let’s talk about the merger that almost happened this last week, or the last month. There was the talk that Rupert Murdoch’s 21st Century Fox, which I just hate saying that, it just feels so wrong.

**Craig:** I know! They should have kept it 20th Century.

**John:** That Fox was going to try to buy Warner Bros, which I’m really glad didn’t happen. So, I wanted to talk sort of what it would have meant if that had happened, and sort of what we in the town talk about as the majors and why I kind of think it’s important that we keep a good high quality number of majors.

Craig, what was your feeling about the whole Fox/Warner thing?

**Craig:** Well, I was really surprised. Look, I don’t own large multinational conglomerates for a reason. I don’t know how they function. But it did seem to me that there was a strange overlap of stuff there that would be hard to reconcile.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** They have two lots, for instance. They have two television production companies. Two film production companies. They have — it just seemed like an enormous amount of duplication. But, on the other hand I understand why they do these things. Essentially they become a mega studio. What I didn’t want to see was a continued streamlining of the business so that even fewer movies are made and even fewer writers are hired. That was the part obviously that was panicking everyone. I was amused by the WGA’s angry fist-waving only because it’s just — you know, sometimes there are missiles going off in the sky and ants are yelling at the missiles, like “go away missiles.” That’s not going to really do anything.

I mean, I understand why they do it. Just sometimes I giggle.

**John:** For people who don’t know what Craig is talking about, the Writers Guild did send out a letter to the membership from Billy Ray, Chip Johannessen…and who else was on the letter? Basically saying that the Writers Guild and specifically the Writers Guild PAC was very concerned about the possibility of this merger.

**Craig:** [laughs] Yeah.

**John:** And Craig is not a fan of the Writers Guild PAC.

**Craig:** Well, look, I just think that it’s — that’s right up there with a strongly worded letter from the United Nations. I just don’t see it having any impact. And frankly I was far — I mean, if I’m looking for somebody to root for in that circumstance it wasn’t the Writers Guild, it was Warner Bros, and specifically Jeff Bewkes who seemed totally disinterested in this. And the moves that Warner Bros made to essentially head off what could have turned into a hostile takeover.

**John:** Yeah. I think it felt really weird and wrong to me. And I didn’t quite understand why Murdoch wanted to do it. It felt like an acquisition for the sake of just “let’s make something even bigger,” and I didn’t see great things coming out of it.

Because you have to remember, and I should relate this back to on the blog two weeks ago I posted this really interesting organizational chart from Disney. I don’t know if you saw that, Craig.

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** But it was this historical organizational chart from Disney that showed way back in 1959 sort of how the whole studio was arranged and how these parts fed these parts and how it all fit together.

And you look at if Fox and Warner were to merge, there are just so many pieces that you don’t even think of. Like you don’t think that HBO and therefore Game of Thrones, that’s Warner’s. And so it’s not just you’re talking about the people who made the Batman movie, the people who make the X-Men movie are going to be in the same place. It’s like these huge networks that would be combined and I just don’t see how it could possibly have benefited honestly either studio or certainly not people trying to make quality shows.

**Craig:** I think that’s for sure. I think that Fox was looking, may have been looking at two big areas. One was the fact that Time Warner controls the delivery pipeline to homes. They own a very large and significant cable service that delivers content. That’s something that Fox itself doesn’t have.

**John:** Fox owns Direct TV, don’t they?

**Craig:** Oh, they do?

**John:** I thought they did. I may be completely confused.

**Craig:** I don’t know if that’s true.

**John:** I’ll look it up right now.

**Craig:** If that’s the case it would just solidify… — I mean, really what it comes down to I think is guys like Rupert Murdoch, they look at who the bigger conglomerate is and try and be as big as them. So, maybe he’s looking over at Charter or Comcast because he sees, okay, Universal and Comcast are teamed up. That’s a content creator and a content deliverer. And Warner Bros. Is a content creator and they’re a content deliverer. Fox, I don’t know, we’ll see what you turn up, but if they don’t have a delivery system in place that may have been the play he was making.

And the other studio I think he had his eye on was in fact Disney because Disney currently is three major studios, not one. They create all of their Disney branded content. Marvel, which at this point now is essentially as big a studio as any of these, I think, or at least it’s as big as something like New Regency. And then Pixar.

**John:** So, let’s do a run through of what we talk about when we talk about the majors. So, the majors in my listing would be, counting on my six fingers, is Fox, Warner, Sony, Universal, Disney, and Paramount.

**Craig:** That’s correct.

**John:** There’s other things we talk about kind of like majors, but they’re not their own independent majors, usually because they’re not distributing features. So, things like Legendary, New Regency, Alcon, MGM, Imagine, those are places that often are financing movies and they’re making movies, but they’re not like the full service deal. I can also be confusing because within these big majors there are many sub-labels. And so Craig was talking through Disney. So, Disney the labels you have — Walt Disney Pictures, Touchstone Pictures, Disney Nature, Disney Animation, Pixar, now Lucas Film, Marvel —

**Craig:** Oh yeah, I forgot, Lucas Film, of course, the Star Wars thing, too. Geez.

**John:** And, hey, are you counting DreamWorks as a major or not major at this point?

**Craig:** Well, at this point they’re not, no.

**John:** Because they distribute through Disney now, through Disney and through Fox.

**Craig:** Look, Legendary distributes — they had been distributing through Warner Bros, now they distribute through Universal. New Regency distributes through Fox. Alcon distributes through Warner Bros. MGM distributes through Sony, I believe. Imagine is through Universal. All of these, if you’re distributing through somebody then you are essentially a mini or a specialty label I would argue. Yeah.

**John:** Yeah. So, and it’s interesting, I was doing some introspection as I was trying to list the major, I literally think of them geographically. I start in the southwest, toward the west and sort of move towards Burbank. So that’s why I’m sort of thinking through like my Sony sweep, so you don’t miss one along the way.

**Craig:** That’s right.

**John:** The only one that’s actually in Hollywood is Paramount. Everything else is on the fringes.

**Craig:** Yes. That’s why I try to work for Universal or Warner Bros because they’re the closest to my house. It’s great.

**John:** Less driving. I can walk to Paramount. But I never work there.

**Craig:** Paramount is only like 25 minutes from my house. But, why? Universal, Warner Bros, 15 minutes away. Disney — think they’ll let me write a Star Wars movie, [laughs], if I ask really nicely?

**John:** Everyone we know is writing a Star Wars movie except for you and me.

**Craig:** I know. What do you think if I called up and I said, “Look, here’s the thing. I want to write a Star Wars movie and I’ll be totally honest with you guys It’s not because I’m a huge Star Wars fan, it’s just that you’re so close. You’re so close to where I live.”

**John:** Except as we know from our friends who are working there, the Star Wars movies aren’t really being written at Disney. They’re being written up in San Francisco which is a lot further.

**Craig:** Well, I would ask for, you know.

**John:** Oh, you’d ask for Kathy Kennedy and everybody to come down?

**Craig:** Yeah.

**John:** That totally makes sense. Because they would do that for you, Craig.

**Craig:** I like that I’ve reduced my chances from 0.000001% to 0.00000001%.

**John:** Yes.

**Craig:** But, there is a finite chance.

**John:** Yeah. There’s always a chance.

**Craig:** Always a chance.

**John:** [laughs] So, I want there to be, I don’t want there to be any fewer majors. And I don’t want there to be fewer majors as a screenwriter who writes features, but especially as a TV writer. You compress these things down too much and it just becomes madness. So, you want there to be lots of people there to potentially buy your stuff and to put stuff out there.

Because even though sometimes if you’re writing a spec feature script, it’s one of these financiers that’s actually buying the script, so it’s a legendary or it’s an Alcon. They still have to go through a studio. And so if none of those studios are — if you don’t have two of those studios excited about doing it, then you’re going to have a hard time getting that movie made.

**Craig:** Everything would suffer. It may not be the case that Rupert Murdoch’s bottom line would suffer, but our experience here in Hollywood as writers would suffer. There’s been a lot of complaining about what we call vertical integration. I don’t know if vertical integration is the worst thing in the world. It’s hard for me to tell. I can’t tell.

I know that it was bad when syndication fees started getting reduced because of sweetheart deals, although syndication in and of itself is kind of going by the wayside. But I’m not sure that it’s been a bad thing for feature writers, at least. The fact that Disney owns ABC, I’m not sure that affects my life as a feature writer. But if they eliminated one of the six buyers, I mean, the six major buyers, oh, that would be disaster.

**John:** Bad.

**Craig:** Disaster.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** And I didn’t understand what would even be in it for Warner Bros other than I suppose some crazy offer to the shareholders, but it seems like they effectively rebuffed that whole situation.

**John:** Which is a good thing.

**Craig:** For us it is.

**John:** It is. Craig, you suggested a topic of test screenings. So, what should we talk about with test screenings?

**Craig:** Well, this is something that had come up through Twitter. Someone asked the question, “How do you guys deal with test screenings?” And I thought, oh my god, what a great question because it’s the worst and/or the best.

**John:** I love test screenings because they are so — you’re never more nervous than when a test screening starts.

**Craig:** It’s the worst. So, let me walk you folks who haven’t experienced this particular hell through the test screening process. The movie is now at a place where it is ready to show to a test audience, the purpose of which to allow the filmmakers and the producers to get a sense of how it’s working with the audience, what’s playing well, what isn’t, and what changes could be made. Does there need to be some additional photography, etc.

It also gives the studio a sense of how much potential there is in the movie, as if it does really well in test screenings they will begin to think about making a large marketing push and really supporting the movie. If it’s a disaster they’ll just quietly let it wallow out there and die.

So, the test screening process, those of you who don’t live in Los Angeles aren’t familiar with these people. Those who do are. They’re people who stand around movie theaters and approach people that are in the target audience for the movie and that’s predetermined. These people usually work for a company called NRG.

**John:** National Research Group.

**Craig:** There you go. And they say, hey, do you want to see a free movie? And it’ll either be a blind recruit, which is, “It’s a Rated-R comedy, sort of in the vein of The Hangover.” Or it’s a non-blind recruit. “It’s called Identity Thief and it stars Jason Bateman and Melissa McCarthy. It’s a Rated-R comedy and it’s a road trip movie.”

Okay. So, depending, and then they get their audience, people show up. The movie is free for them.

**John:** Generally these screenings are held either on the studio lot but increasingly they rent out a theater — the rent out one of the houses in a big theater, so think a mall theater on like a Tuesday night.

**Craig:** It’s usually the case that you’re in a proper theater somewhere out there in a multiplex. They’ve given you a screen on a Tuesday or a Thursday or Wednesday, some off day. And in goes everyone and they all sit down. And then somebody gets up and says, “You’re one of the first audiences to see…” and they always let people know that it’s temp music and the sound may be off and the visual effects may not be done. And enjoy the movie.

And then people watch the movie and you, the filmmakers, and increasingly the writer is part of this group, sit somewhere in the back and watches people watching the movie. And when it’s done everybody fills out a form. And the form asks them all sorts of questions. Lots of questions. What was your favorite part? What was your least favorite part? What character did you like?

But the most — ultimately the thing that everybody concentrates on is a very simple question. Would you rate this movie Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair, Poor. Five, what we call five boxes. And when that’s all done there’s a focus group —

**John:** Oh, there’s another incredibly important field on that same form. Would you recommend this movie?

**Craig:** Right. Definitely, Maybe, Definitely Not. Yes, you’re right. That’s the other big metric.

Then, once everybody has filled out their forms they leave. The NRG folks have carefully, theoretically, selected 25 people usually to stay behind. And then they run a focus group. They ask them questions. What did you think of the movie, what did you like, how many of you rated it this, how many of you rated it that? And then they start letting people talk about what they liked and didn’t like and the filmmakers listen in on this.

**John:** So, those 25 people who are left behind, they bring those people down to the first two rows and then you as the filmmakers, you sort of sneak in and sit a couple rows behind so you can listen and actually hear what they’re saying. And it’s terrifying because someone will go off on a rant about some random thing and like why aren’t you shutting up that person. And the moderators, if they’re good, they will totally shut up that person and keep the conversation moving and flowing.

**Craig:** That’s right. [laughs] Sometimes they don’t do that and somebody kind of hijacks things. I was in a test screening once where Bob Weinstein actually yelled at one of the focus group people which was spectacular. I just thought that was amazing. Just yelled at a kid who was answering a question.

**John:** That’s awesome.

**Craig:** Yeah, like hey, not only do I yell at the directors, and the writers, and the actors, I’m now just yelling at random audience members. It was pretty great.

**John:** I like that he keeps it consistent. He doesn’t change it up. He’s one person. He’s himself at every moment.

**Craig:** It’s time to yell.

So, when the focus group is over, at that point the NRG people have done a fairly good job of very quickly tallying up all of the ratings for definitely recommend and for what we call the top two boxes — people that rated the movie either Excellent or Very Good. And those are considered the best indication of what people thought of the movie. And that’s when you get your number.

**John:** Yeah. You’re number is the sum of those top two boxes.

**Craig:** So let’s talk numbers. The norms, so that’s sort of, I guess, I don’t know if it’s the mean average or the median average, but the norm changes slightly depending on the genre. There are different norms for family movies. They’re usually higher. And then lower for Rated-R film and so on and so forth. But typically for the kinds of movies you and I have done, usually the norm is something like a 65. If you get a 65 you’re not in good shape. [laughs] The norm is bad.

**John:** Yes.

**Craig:** The norm is bad. It’s bad because it includes movies that were total disasters that got tens, you know. What you’re trying to get — here’s a very, very rough sense. If you’ve made a Rated-R comedy that is of the sort that might be a little polarizing, you’re looking to get an 80. If you can get an 80 you’re in pretty good shape. You get mid-80s, you’re in very good shape. You get mid-70s, you’re okay.

**John:** Below that you’re in trouble.

**Craig:** Below 70 you’ve really got problems. Low 70s, you’ve got some work to do. If you’ve made a family movie, a heartwarming family movie, you’re aiming for 90.

**John:** Oh yeah.

**Craig:** Like John Hancock — when John Lee Hancock tests a movie, I’m like, dude, you need a 98.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** If you make The Blind Side, this heartwarming story of a family that saves this kid and then he just triumphs over adversity, you need a 98. If you get a 95 it’s like an F.

**John:** Yes. Because that 2% means like racists. Who’s not going to like that movie?

**Craig:** Yeah. Racists or just like super grumpy jerks, who just hate joy, and you get those sometimes. And sure enough that’s exactly what they did was, I think, a 98. Okay, so, that’s kind of what you’re going for.

But there are times when it doesn’t work out that way.

**John:** Absolutely that’s true. So, that number is ultimately your take-away from that thing. That’s the thing that people are going to remember. But you will also take away that giant stack of forms. And sometimes those are actually really helpful because when you have questions about what was actually confusing people, you can actually look through those forms and see what it is. And so in those forms they’ll list their favorite moments, their least favorite moments, things that confuse them, characters — you sort of get to rate them on a grid. That can be useful if you’re looking at the next cut, if you’re looking at doing additional photography.

It’s also useful for the marketing people because they get to know what people really love about the movie.

**Craig:** That’s right.

**John:** So, I should back up and say the function of the moderator, the person who is running that forum, I found it to be such an interesting job and there was always one guy who was always doing it for us, a guy named Andy Fiedler. And so when I made The Nines I was like I want that guy to be the moderator on The Nines.

So, we actually cast him as the guy who is doing the test screening of the pilot that is in part two of the movie. So, if you ever want to see what it’s like to be in a test screening, and what it’s like to be in that moment, we have that in The Nines. And it’s literally the guy who would do that test screening.

**Craig:** Nice back door promo there, by the way. Way to go. Nice job.

**John:** Certainly. Absolutely. I’m going to get $0.50 from people streaming that on Netflix right now.

**Craig:** You have fifty cents coming your way.

The stack of forms that you go through is interesting. Very famously when you go through the forms you will find some that sink your heart and you weep for humanity. I think it’s Scott Stuber has one framed on his wall. It’s a form. So, there’s like a lot of questions about the movie and someone has answered none of them. They’ve just written across the form in the pencil diagonally, “More boobs.”

**John:** I’ve never seen this thing, but as you were telling this story I knew exactly that it would say More Boobs. It would have to say More Boobs.

**Craig:** More Boobs. Which in a way is one of the more informative ones of those survey submissions.

**John:** Like a Weinstein Brother, that person was expressing his thought consistently and clearly. And that’s really — there’s something laudable about that.

**Craig:** Well, also, he’s given you a path to success.

**John:** Now, Craig, you do more comedy-comedies, so I’m curious whether you do this thing that Seth Rogan does where they videotape the audience and so they can see exactly where the laughs are.

**Craig:** Absolutely. So, that’s something that goes all the way about the ZAZ guys, I think, from they started doing it back in The Naked Gun days, you know, with like VCRs and stuff. But, yeah, we record the audience. I did it with David Zucker. I did it with Todd Phillips. And you can put them in, first of all, huge benefit to it is that it solves debates in the editing room. Because what inevitably happens is you’re sitting in the editing room, the producer is like that joke didn’t work and the writer is like, no, no, no, I totally remember that, it got a huge laugh. And the director is like I can’t — I think it got an okay laugh, but maybe it went on too long and went past the laugh.

Okay, the audience in two sizes in night vision is in the avid and you can play it simultaneous like screens side by side.

**John:** That’s great. That was my question, whether you sync to that. That’s brilliant.

**Craig:** Absolutely. And then you go, okay, it did get a laugh, you’re an idiot, but it did go too long. Like the laugh ends there. Let’s cut away. These are the things that help maintain pace because you’re guessing, you know, and look — usually our guesses are pretty good. You get to a place where you have decent instincts about these things, but nobody bats a thousand, so those things are useful.

The biggest use to me when it comes to test screenings for comedies is that you begin to feel the movie for the first time.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** It’s a strange thing to say that you’ve watched a movie, you wrote it, you shot it, you edit it, you edit it over and over and over and over, you put it together you show it to people, and then just sitting in that room it’s like you’re seeing it for the first time.

**John:** It’s 100% true. And I think as a writer what I’ve gotten so much out of test screenings and being there with the audience is I start to be able to see — not just see problems but find solutions because I’m there in real-time with an audience and feeling it the way they’re feeling it.

And so my function is often, if it’s not the movie that I’m directly sort of involved in cutting, I’m the person who sort of is synthesizing the mood and I’m writing up the most notes and sort of the biggest batch of notes about this cut and sort of what the reaction is. And I send that through to the producers and the director saying like here is what we think we can do. And sometimes it’s incredible specific stuff like I think we could lose this half of this phrase, or get to this shot quicker. And sometimes I can see that just watching a cut just on a screen, but seeing it there with an audience you really get a sense of like, okay, this is how it’s playing in front of real people.

**Craig:** Yeah. You begin to see things on two levels. You might sit there and go, “Oh my god, this scene is so long and boring. I never understood how long and boring it was until I became a member of the audience.” Or “oh my god, the ending doesn’t work. Or, “oh my god, we’re in the wrong place at the wrong time.”

But then there are also these little moments that occur where after fine-tuning something in the editing room, you watch it with an audience and you go, wait — wait, wait, wait, that line, we should be looking at her when that line is said. We shouldn’t be looking at him. Little things. All that stuff comes out. I will say that the first test screening is perhaps the most harrowing, psychologically harrowing experience you can have in the entertainment business because you don’t know. You don’t know if you’re on your way to the gallows, or a parade, or a shrug.

**John:** Because it’s honestly like a live performance. Anything can go wrong at any moment. You really have no sense of how people are going to respond 30 frames from now, and whether that joke is going to play or not play. And once you’ve seen the movie with an audience, you get a pretty good sense. Like you may have better audiences or wore audiences, but it’s going to be one movie. It’s the same movie the whole time through. Here you just don’t know.

And I would say it’s the second most nerve-wracking experience. For me as a writer, if I haven’t been in the editing room beforehand, seeing that first cu is incredibly difficult for me too. Just like, “Ooh, that doesn’t even make sense.”

**Craig:** Seeing the first cut is injurious to everybody. I mean, the director watches the assembly and vomits everything inside of her out. the writer watches the director’s cut and vomits everything inside of himself out. But, you also know — but, okay, I still have control over this before it is witnessed and I am humiliated. That’s the part that’s rough. And in comedy it’s particularly brutal because it’s like you’re showing up at open mic night and you’ve paid a $100 million ticket to get in and everything bombs.

So, I usually, when I go to a test screening I bring a very small — the smallest dosage of Xanax there is and I have it in my pocket. It’s basically like a cyanide capsule. And if around the 35th minute it seems like the boat is sinking, I’ll take the Xanax. I’ve only had to take it once, but knowing it’s there so that I don’t curl up and die. And then alternatively there’s the experience of the home run. And that’s just awesome.

**John:** That was Go. I mean, the first test screening it was a 91 and then we knew we were going to go back and reshoot some stuff so it was like we’re good.

**Craig:** It’s such a great feeling. I think the best test screening I’ve ever been to in my life was the first test screening for The Hangover Part II. It was — I can’t remember, I think we scored a 91 or a 92, which for a Rated-R comedy is really hard to do.

**John:** It’s great.

**Craig:** It’s just hard. I mean, a Rated-R comedy where there’s exposed penises and stuff. It’s just — some people are going to get angry. And it was a rock concert. It was the greatest. And then you are able to relax. You’re actually able to make the movie better than you would have otherwise because you’re calm, you’re not tense. People aren’t angry.

Boy, when it goes bad. Oof.

**John:** Yeah. It’s a dark day when it goes bad. Because with good news people are willing to open up the purse strings, willing to let you go and do things and you have power. If it goes badly, you’ve lost so much momentum and power.

**Craig:** Oh yeah.

**John:** And they just get defensive and they start to —

**Craig:** They get defensive. And also the arguments become that much more difficult.

“So, what do we do to fix it?”

“Well, I think this is what we should do.”

“Really, do you? Guy that just made a movie that didn’t test well?”

“Oh, oh, I see how this is going to go.” Yeah.

David Zucker always said he never felt the need to sky dive because instead he goes to test screenings of his movies. It’s terrifying, but it’s very important. And it’s not the kind of thing where we sit there and custom tailor the movie in every way to the people in the audience. We don’t do that. It’s more for us to experience it with an audience.

**John:** The second Charlie’s Angels was not test screened and it shows.

**Craig:** Did they not test screen it because they knew?

**John:** No, I think it was just — they got into a weird protective state where they’re just like, “Oh, we know it’s really good and so we’re just going to do a little test screening just with like some friends.” They did sort of like a friends and family test screening. That can be valid, but you need to have I think a true —

**Craig:** Must. Believe me, I understand why you wouldn’t want to do it. And I can come up with 20 great reasons why you wouldn’t want to do it and they’re all lies to cover and protect from the misery of doing it.

**John:** I question whether Guardians of the Galaxy or most of the Marvel movies get real test screenings. I never see things leaking out about test screening that they’ve done. And yet they must be showing them to people so they know what’s working.

**Craig:** Well, it’s interesting. I was really surprised that things didn’t leak from — The Hangover Part II I thought, okay, stuff is going to leak. I mean, The Hangover was a huge movie. This is the sequel. Stuff is going to leak. Nope. People actually — because they say to people, don’t do it. And they don’t. They’ll go on twitter and say, “Just saw a screening of this. It was awesome.” They’ll do that.

**John:** Yeah.

**Craig:** But they don’t seem to talk about it. Obviously the people that recruit, they become particularly good at who they don’t want to let in there, you know. There are certain types of people .They just look at them and like, “Blogger, get out.”

**John:** Blogger.

**Craig:** Blogger.

**John:** So that’s test screenings. A good topic and a good conversation on that. My last thing that I want to bring up was this great article I read by Gretchen McCulloch and she wrote for Grammar Girl which is a regular column. But Gretchen McCulloch is a linguistic anthropologist. She has a whole blog about language and how we use it. And she had this fascinating piece on About and Aboot and sort of the whole ways Canadians pronounce certain vowel sounds, but I think I brought it up on the show, too.

When I shot a pilot in Canada, I’ve done two different shows that were in Canada. I would have to be very mindful about actors who were going to be cast out of Canada because sometimes I would actually need to change their dialogue so they wouldn’t say certain words because it would immediately give them away, at least to me, that they were Canadian and that the show was not taking place in Washington, DC but was actually being shot in Toronto.

So, the word that we always sort of make fun of for Canadians is about, which we say that they are saying “Aboot.”

**Craig:** No, they’re not saying Aboot.

**John:** They’re not saying Aboot. What they’re doing is, and what Gretchen sort of charts out is that they’re actually — they have a different diphthong for “ou” sounds that are in front of unvoiced consonants. So, an interesting thing she brings up is so we live in a house. But if a housemate stayed with us, we would be housing them.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** Or we would house them. That S becomes a Z sound in house. And if a Canadian were to pronounce those two words they would pronounce the first one, and I’m going to butcher this a little bit, house. They’d pronounce the second one, sorry, they’d pronounce the first one “hoose” and the second one house. I exaggerated it a little bit.

**Craig:** I don’t think. My impression of the Canadian is house. House. Are you going to your house.

**John:** I think you’re very close.

**Craig:** House.

**John:** Yes.

**Craig:** It’s about.

**John:** About. So, what it is, it’s called Canadian Lifting. And it’s a real term. Because it’s literally because they say, so “ou” is a diphthong anyway. Ou is two sounds blended together. In Canadian lifting the one that sounds sort of “ooh” like to us, they’re starting the vowel in a different place. And as they’re doing the diphthong, they’re starting the — the first sound is up higher and the tongue is literally lifted up higher to create a —

**Craig:** House. [laughs]

**John:** So, it’s actually just — there will be a link to it in the show notes. But I thought it was a really smart way of articulating something that I could sort of notice but I wasn’t quite sure —

**Craig:** What was going on there.

**John:** It’s so easy to over-apply it. I think that was actually one of the things, too. It’s so easy to think like, oh, every “ou” sound they’re going to do the “ooh” sound. But they’re not. It’s only on certain words and she actually articulates why it’s only certain words.

**Craig:** But can she explain why they’re constantly saying, “Hey buddy?” [laughs]

**John:** She can’t. She also can’t explain why in South Park their heads are two parked things that just bounce atop of each other. She’s not able to do that. It’s not magic.

But one of the other things she does do which I think is absolutely true is the reason why we in the US think they’re saying “aboot” and sort of mock them for it when they’re not saying that at all is because we just don’t have the diphthong that they’re actually using. And so our brains move it to the closest, nearest vowel that we have which is an “ooh” sound. So, they’re not really saying, “ooh,” but we don’t have a sound in our speech that is the sound that they’re making, and so that’s why we’re hearing it wrong because we don’t have that sound in our spoken language.

**Craig:** What’s so funny about the way I’m saying about? [laughs]

**John:** [laughs] That was good.

**Craig:** Thank you, buddy.

**John:** It’s time for One Cool Things. Do you have a One Cool Thing, Craig?

**Craig:** Ooh, One Cool Thing. Just out of curiosity, those guys are — they came up with the notion of, all right, so all the Canadians have flappy heads, which really they kind of retrofit to Ike, you know, because they decided that he was Canadian and he had a flat head.

But they all, not only do they — they’re calling people buddy, but they all sound like they’re from the 1920s. “Hey buddy.” There’s that old Hollywood way of talking. I don’t know. It’s very strange.

All right, so I was back east for a couple of weeks and I saw a couple of shows because you know me, Broadway Craig. I saw Violet, which is wonderful, starring the great, great Sutton Foster. Excellent Josh Henry. Very, very good show. And I also saw — but that’s a limited run, so that is a cool thing, but it’s not a cool thing that will be accessible after I think next week.

**John:** No, because I think actually tonight is the last night, as we’re recording this.

**Craig:** Yes, I believe it is tonight or maybe tomorrow. Tomorrow? I don’t know, buddy.

But the show I did see that I think is going to be around for awhile is A Gentleman’s Guide to Love and Murder, which was outstanding. Have you seen it?

**John:** I have not seen it. It was playing while we were doing Big Fish and people loved it. So, it seems madcap, and it’s still Jefferson — is it Jefferson Davis?

**Craig:** No, Jefferson Davis was the general in the Confederate Army. Yeah, I believe he was at Bull Run.

**John:** So he’s not a Broadway star?

**Craig:** No, no. He’s not even alive.

**John:** Well, I thought, I mean, they can just do — I don’t know. They can do magic.

**Craig:** Yeah, they might bring him back.

**John:** Because oftentimes on Broadway they’ll put a famous person in a role, like Tony Danza will be in Chicago, so Jefferson Davis could completely be. Oh, but it’s Jefferson Mays.

**Craig:** Jefferson Mays. Jefferson Davis may have an issue just with New York in general.

**John:** That’s true.

**Craig:** All of the freed slaves walking around may irk him. But Jefferson Mays is outstanding in the show. It’s a very funny show. Bryce Pinkham is also excellent, too.

It’s a strange thing. You want to say it’s a two-hander. It’s like a nine-hander, because Jefferson Mays plays eight different parts and Bryce Pinkham plays one. There’s just great performances throughout. It’s very, very funny. It’s based on this really, really old novel that was also the inspiration for the old movie Kind Hearts and Coronets, an old Alec Guinness film. But excellent, very entertaining, great time. If you are in the New York Tri-State area you should totally check it out. And if not, just wait, it’ll be on its way I’m sure to Chicago, LA, all over the place. It’s excellent.

**John:** Craig, when you were in New York in the past years did you get a chance to see One man, Two Guvnors, the James Corden?

**Craig:** No. And I heard that that was hysterical.

**John:** It was great. And so it reminds me of that because James Corden has to play multiple roles and the show is about the show as much as anything else. So it has that same sort of — it’s not really a musical, but it’s sort of a musical quality. I thought you’d enjoy it.

**Craig:** I probably would have. I probably would have.

**John:** You would have enjoyed it. But not it’s passed.

**Craig:** Now it’s passed.

**John:** My One Cool Thing is a book I read on my Kindle while I was traveling throughout Germany and Austria. It’s called How Jesus Became God, by Bart Ehrman, who is a historian who mostly focuses on New Testament and sort of early religion, early Christian religion stuff. And it was actually just fascinating because I had a general sense that Christianity in its very first century is not at all sort of like the Christianity we have today. And he does a really great job of looking at both the Gospel text and sort of the other texts that are sort of around that time and sort of demonstrate that the early apostles and sort of the early followers of Jesus did not perceive him at all in the same ways that we perceive him now.

And they did not perceive him necessarily as the son of God. They didn’t perceive him necessarily even as a divine being. But that sort of got retcon’d in over the years and centuries and over different rewritings of the stories. So, it was a fascinating book.

**Craig:** So they didn’t think that, for instance, Jesus could save you from a car crash or help you with your debt?

**John:** That was not a priority. Granted, there were not cars to crash. But a cart crash, perhaps.

**Craig:** Okay, so in terms of a cart crash, Jesus take the wheel.

**John:** Jesus could never really take the wheel because he was a person — there were wheels.

**Craig:** Right. So when Jesus was alive he could take the wheel.

**John:** He could take the reins.

**Craig:** He could take the reins. [laughs] Jesus take the reins. A very popular song in the year, what, 30.

**John:** In the year 30 it was all the talk.

What I found sort of most interesting about this, because I really come at this from I love Greek mythology and sort of classical mythology. And it’s interesting to look at — at the time the Christian religion is starting, there really were, sort of polytheistic religions were common. And even in monotheistic religions like Judaism at the time there were perceptions of divine beings who were not gods sort of all over the place. There were a lot more sort of angels coming in and doing stuff.

And so looking at sort of early Christianity from the background of those people at that time, it was not the uncommon for somebody to be semi-divine but not fully divine.

**Craig:** Right.

**John:** I just thought it was really interesting.

**Craig:** That is interesting. There’s a whole school of Jesus — my late father-in-law was really into this stuff. The Historical Jesus is a big book. I don’t know if you ever read that one. I think it’s by a guy named John Crossan. I may be messing this up completely, but it’s all really about, okay, what do we actually know? What’s real? What did he really say?

There’s this conference where the sort of Jesusologists get together and they kind of go through the bible and basically kind of like red line it. And they’re like, “Didn’t say that. Probably didn’t say that. Definitely said that.” Just based on the evidence. And apparently a lot of that stuff he didn’t say.

**John:** Even if you take as literal the Gospels, and the Gospels are the gospel truth, those were written way, way, way after his actual life. And so we don’t have the first person accounts we sort of think we do. And I think there’s a common perception that this is an account of exactly what happened at the time. It’s like, well, it’s not. This is a written down version of all the stories that were being talked about at the time. And some of those clearly relate to each other. But some of them really don’t relate to each other. When you see the contradictions between the Gospels, that’s because they’re multiple versions of the stories, just like there are multiple versions of the Superman mythos. It’s going to go different directions.

**Craig:** Oh yeah, I mean, look, people can’t remember emails they read 14 minutes ago. Now they’re going to put a bible together? Listen, you know where I’m on this. You know where I’m on this?

**John:** Where are you on this?

**Craig:** Oh, listen, man. [laughs] It’s just us. We’re just meat shoved through a thresher, or something, something. Something, something, something. Something. I got to go pick up some Ligotti and tell you what’s going on. But that’s what’s going on. That’s the story. There’s nothing but this, man.

**John:** Yeah. There’s nothing but this podcast.

**Craig:** God, I’ll tell you what. Honestly though, if I die — I’m going to die — when I die —

**John:** I’m not sure you’re going to die, Craig.

**Craig:** It’s possible. There could be the singularity. If I die, and I find myself up there in heaven, I am in so much trouble. Not for doing bad things, but the non-believing. Ooh.

**John:** Ooh, its’ so —

**Craig:** I’m going to have to tap dance my way out of that. I’m not sure how I’m going to be able to do it.

**John:** But here’s the situation though. Who’s to say that was the one religion you should have chosen when there is some other obscure religion that we’re not even paying attention to. Like, oh that was the one you were supposed to be doing. And none of us are doing it.

**Craig:** That’s right. Yeah, that was in the South Park Movie. Do you remember that?

**John:** Oh that’s true. Yeah.

**Craig:** When Kenny goes to heaven, and they send him to hell because he wasn’t the one religion, the right one. Do you remember what the right one was?

**John:** I don’t remember what it was.

**Craig:** Somebody goes, “Wait a second, we’re all different religions and we all got sent here. What’s the right religion?”

And one of the demons goes, “Uh, Mormonism. The answer was Mormonism.”

And everyone goes, “Ooh….”

**John:** “Ooh…”

**Craig:** “Ooh…I was so close.”

**John:** And like the Weinsteins, they are consistent in their Mormonism.

**Craig:** They love Mormons.

**John:** Yeah. They’re Coloradoans, that’s what it is.

**Craig:** I love Mormons, too.

**John:** Oh, God, I love them.

**Craig:** They’re nice people.

**John:** This was episode 157. That means there’s 156 back episodes of the show.

**Craig:** Oh my god, so many.

**John:** The most recent 20 are on iTunes, so please go to iTunes and subscribe and leave a comment because that helps iTunes know that we are a podcast that exists in the world.

If you want those previous episodes from 137 back to the dawn of time, those are on scriptnotes.net. And you can also subscribe there and for $1.99 a month get all those episodes. You can listen to them through your Android or your iPhone app. Look for the Scriptnotes app in the app store there.

Notes for today’s episode you can find at johnaugust.com/scriptnotes. And that’s where you’ll find links to some of the things we talked about. You’ll also find a link to our USB drive that has all those back episodes, too. So, if you just want them all in one little convenient package you can get them there.

And I think that’s it.

**Craig:** You get to go to bed now.

**John:** Hooray! It’s 2pm and it’s time to curl up.

**Craig:** Yeah, all right, well happy recovery and I’ll see you next week.

**John:** Thanks. Bye.

Links:

* [Did the writer of True Detective plagiarize Thomas Ligotti and others?](http://lovecraftzine.com/2014/08/04/did-the-writer-of-true-detective-plagiarize-thomas-ligotti-and-others/)
* [Nic Pizzolatto on Thomas Ligotti and the Weird Secrets of True Detective](http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2014/02/02/writer-nic-pizzolatto-on-thomas-ligotti-and-the-weird-secrets-of-true-detective/)
* [The Problem With Saying True Detective Was “Plagiarized”](http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2014/08/06/true_detective_plagiarized_no_nic_pizzolatto_did_not_plagiarize_thomas_ligotti.html)
* [Stephen Glass](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Glass) on Wikipedia
* Slate on [Why Biden’s plagiarism shouldn’t be forgotten](http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/history_lesson/2008/08/the_write_stuff.html)
* The New York Times on [How Opal Mehta Got Kissed, Got Wild and Got a Life](http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/27/books/27cnd-author.html?_r=0)
* [Fox Withdraws Time Warner Bid](http://online.wsj.com/articles/fox-withdraws-time-warner-bid-1407269617)
* Wikipedia on [the Majors](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_film_studio)
* Slate on [NRG](http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/the_hollywood_economist/2005/07/hidden_persuaders.html)
* [How Canadians Really Pronounce “About”](http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/how-canadians-really-pronounce-about?page=all)
* [A Gentleman’s Guide to Love and Murder](http://www.agentlemansguidebroadway.com/)
* [One Man, Two Guvnors](http://www.onemantwoguvnors.com/)
* [How Jesus Became God](http://www.amazon.com/dp/0061778184/?tag=johnaugustcom-20) by Bart D. Ehrman
* [The Historical Jesus](http://www.amazon.com/dp/0060616296/?tag=johnaugustcom-20) by John Dominic Crossan
* [Outro](http://johnaugust.com/2013/scriptnotes-the-outros) by Scriptnotes listener Rajesh Naroth ([send us yours!](http://johnaugust.com/2014/outros-needed))

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Newsletter

Inneresting Logo A Quote-Unquote Newsletter about Writing
Read Now

Explore

Projects

  • Aladdin (1)
  • Arlo Finch (27)
  • Big Fish (88)
  • Birdigo (2)
  • Charlie (39)
  • Charlie's Angels (16)
  • Chosen (2)
  • Corpse Bride (9)
  • Dead Projects (18)
  • Frankenweenie (10)
  • Go (29)
  • Karateka (4)
  • Monsterpocalypse (3)
  • One Hit Kill (6)
  • Ops (6)
  • Preacher (2)
  • Prince of Persia (13)
  • Shazam (6)
  • Snake People (6)
  • Tarzan (5)
  • The Nines (118)
  • The Remnants (12)
  • The Variant (22)

Apps

  • Bronson (14)
  • FDX Reader (11)
  • Fountain (32)
  • Highland (74)
  • Less IMDb (4)
  • Weekend Read (64)

Recommended Reading

  • First Person (87)
  • Geek Alert (151)
  • WGA (162)
  • Workspace (19)

Screenwriting Q&A

  • Adaptation (65)
  • Directors (90)
  • Education (49)
  • Film Industry (489)
  • Formatting (128)
  • Genres (89)
  • Glossary (6)
  • Pitches (29)
  • Producers (59)
  • Psych 101 (118)
  • Rights and Copyright (96)
  • So-Called Experts (47)
  • Story and Plot (170)
  • Television (165)
  • Treatments (21)
  • Words on the page (237)
  • Writing Process (177)

More screenwriting Q&A at screenwriting.io

© 2026 John August — All Rights Reserved.