• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

John August

  • Arlo Finch
  • Scriptnotes
  • Library
  • Store
  • About

Words on the page

Writing fight scenes

July 19, 2011 Charlie's Angels, QandA, Words on the page

questionmarkHow much should one describe a fight scene in a screenplay? How specific should you get? What do you leave for the director/choreographer to figure out?

— Evan

answer iconAlways remember that you’re writing a movie, not a screenplay. Even though you only have words at your disposal, you’re trying to create the experience of watching a movie.

When two characters are talking, that’s easy. Dialogue is straightforward.

When two characters are fighting, that’s hard. Action sequences are the most difficult and least rewarding things a screenwriter writes, but they’re essential to many movies.

I’d direct your attention first to a scriptcast I recorded: [Writing better action](http://johnaugust.com/2009/writing-better-action).

My advice there applies to any situation in which characters are running around, doing things.

Keep sentences short.

Use sluglines to break things up.

Keep our attention so we’re not tempted to skim.

When you have two characters fighting, you’re not going to write every punch. Rather, you need to get specific on how this fight feels different than every other movie fight. What is it about the style, the environment, the stakes and the story that makes this battle unique to this movie and this moment?

The original script for the 2001 Charlie’s Angels sequel (then called Charlie’s Angels Forever) called for Alex (Lucy Liu) and The Thin Man (Crispin Glover) team up in a generic suburban house in Las Vegas.

Here’s what the minimal version of the scene would look like:

INT. HOUSE – DAY

Alex and The Thin Man take on a dozen CARULLO FAMILY THUGS, smashing the house apart in the process.

When every goon is down, Alex disarms The Thin Man. A tense moment, then they suddenly kiss.

ALEX

Who are you?

It’s short, and you’ll find examples like this in many screenplays, including some that have been produced. But it’s cripplingly unspecific. As readers, we have no idea what we’d actually see on the screen.

Will it be scary? Goofy? Gruesome? Realistic?

The actual scene I wrote was a lot longer:

INT. BEDROOM – DAY

TWO THUGS open the closet doors, pawing through racks of dresses as they look for their prey. But they haven’t yet checked

UNDER THE BED,

where a knife-wielding hand suddenly lashes out, cutting one thug’s Achille’s tendons. The goon SCREAMS as he falls. Gun in hand, his partner flips back the comforter to carefully look underneath.

But there’s no one there.

Confused, he glances up just in time to see the Thin Man kick him across the face.

Hearing the commotion, two more GOONS crowd into the room.

Ripping the clotheshanger pole from the closet, the Thin Man uses it as a quarterstaff. Not only does he take down those two thugs, he also drives it

THROUGH THE WALL

to peg ANOTHER GUY in the hallway.

INT. KITCHEN – DAY

Still holding Chico the Chihuahua, Alex takes on one THUG after another, using all the tools at her disposal. One guy gets hit with the freezer door, while another gets a face full of flour and a frying pan to the head.

Alex may not be much of a cook, but she’s great in the kitchen.

Needing both hands free, Alex puts Chico into a ceramic cookie jar. A beat later, the dog pokes his head out from under the lid, wanting to watch the fight.

Rolling back over the counter, Alex swings a hanging plant to knock out a pursuer. Be it a waffle iron, rolling pin or barbecue tong, anything Alex touches becomes a weapon.

INT. BATHROOM – DAY

A THUG goes flying through the glass shower door, which SHATTERS. Wrapping his hand in a towel, the Thin Man grabs a large shard and uses it as a glass sword.

INT. LIVING ROOM – DAY

On the table, the iMac’s progress bar shows that Betty’s interminable download is nearly complete. Alex faces two more thugs. She kicks one through the wall. Just then we hear...

AOL VOICE

File’s done!

Alex picks up the iMac and SMASHES it into the second thug, who goes down. Just when she thinks she’s finished, she hears a

SHOTGUN PUMPING

behind her. She turns to face one last thug, the LEADER. He keeps both barrels trained on her.

THUG LEADER

Kung-fu this, bitch.

Alex knows she’s toast. But just then, we hear a THWICK!

The cut was so fast we didn’t really see it, but then the Thug Leader’s head separates from his body. Both parts fall, revealing

THE THIN MAN,

who carries his improvised glass sword, now blood-stained.

Half a beat, then Alex rushes him. She spin-kicks and SHATTERS his sword, which falls to pieces on the floor.

Both unarmed and extremely dangerous, Alex and the Thin Man stare at each other, face-to-face, not sure what happens next.

Suddenly he grabs her, pulling her in for

A PASSIONATE KISS.

She doesn’t fight it -- at least not at first. But then the adrenaline wears off, and she pushes free.

ALEX

Who are you?

While I’ve included a lot of specific ideas about what kinds of things we’d see (shower doors, closet rods), I’ve left a lot of room for the director and fight choreographer to be creative (“Be it a waffle iron, rolling pin or barbecue tong, anything Alex touches becomes a weapon.”).

The scene as written gives a sense of what the final scene will feel like, even if a lot of the details change. That’s what you should be aiming for in a fight sequence.

Javier Grillo-Marxuach on craft

July 14, 2011 Television, Words on the page

The Tiny Protagonist has a [good interview](http://thetinyprotagonist.wordpress.com/2011/07/12/interview-javier-grillo-marxuach-of-lost-and-the-middleman-part-1-of-2/) with Javier Grillo-Marxuach (a writer/producer on Lost and many other shows), talking about how he got started and the craft of television.

I like his explanation of keeping the reader engaged:

> You know what a Gilligan cut is? It’s how on Gilligan’s Island, the captain always goes, “I’m not wearing the chicken suit!” and then bam –- he’s wearing the chicken suit. A Gilligan cut is very much a SMASH CUT TO. So if I have two scenes that are sort of languid scenes of characters, you probably don’t put a CUT TO. But if you’re doing a Gilligan cut, then you put a SMASH CUT, and instead of using a slug line, you turn your slug line into the captain wearing the chicken suit, and you describe the setting later. So you do things like that really to try to get the reader involved with the prose so they don’t just go from dialogue to dialogue.

To get a sense of his style, check out [Grillo-Marxuach’s site](http://web.mac.com/chaodai/Grillo_Marxuach_Design_Bureau/projects.html), where he’s posted a bunch of his scripts, treatments and pitch documents.

He also discusses one thing I’ve come to appreciate over the years: screenwriting does get easier with practice. What you lose in youthful energy you make up for in finesse:

> I find that, what experience gives you is craft, which means that when inspiration fails you, you can still build a pretty workable set of bookcases, even if they’re not the prettiest bookcases. And an ability to cope, mostly to cope with the psychological rigors of the job.

Formatting an interview montage

June 27, 2011 Formatting, QandA, Words on the page

questionmarkI’m writing a scene where my character is going on a series of interviews, but instead of writing out each individual interview, I want to do a montage of sorts, where different questions come from different interviewers.

The problem is I don’t know how to format it. Do I clearly mark it as a montage and just give each interviewer a different name, or do I have to go through and put each interview question under a different slug line?

— Trent
Iowa

answer iconYour instinct is correct. This is a classic montage, and is simple to do on the page. If you’re staying in one location — or a series of similar locations — you don’t need individual sluglines.

INT. CONFERENCE ROOM / A IS A INDUSTRIES – DAY [EARLIER]

MONTAGE: Randy meets with a series of INTERVIEWERS, beginning with WALTHAM GROEPNIK (50).

GROEPNIK

Consider an anthill.

RANDY

Okay.

GROEPNIK

Is it rational for the ants to work only for the benefit of the collective? Can an ant even be considered rational?

A beat. Randy blinks. Concentrates.

RANDY

What color are the ants?

CUT TO:

VIVIAN LAKELAND (25) is darkly seductive, but icy.

LAKELAND

What is your greatest weakness?

RANDY

I guess I’m late sometimes. I oversleep.

LAKELAND

Why would you admit to weakness?

CUT TO:

TREVOR KNIGHT (30) was probably a high school football star until he left the field mid-game, never to return.

KNIGHT

Would you say you’re a team player?

RANDY

Sure.

Knight makes a note on his form.

RANDY

Wait, no. No.

But Knight keeps writing.

RANDY

Yes?

QUICK CUTS:

GROEPNIK

If knowledge is the awareness of reality, how could you be aware of something unreal?

LAKELAND

(lighting cigarette)

Why do you bore me?

KNIGHT

What is the largest criminal organization in the world?

Randy thinks for a long moment.

RANDY

The Girl Scouts?

Knight smiles. Nods.

For production, the AD would likely break these out as a series of scenes (e.g. A24, B24, C24) on the board, but it can stay the same on the page.

If your character is going out for a series of interviews in different locations — Company A, Company B and Company C — you’re generally better off using sluglines the first time each of these is introduced. Once you’ve set up all of them, use INTERCUT (just once) to signal the reader that you’ll be cutting back and forth.

Write the way you speak

May 6, 2011 Psych 101, Words on the page

As he loses his voice to cancer, Christopher Hitchens writes about the idea of [literary voice](http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2011/06/christopher-hitchens-unspoken-truths-201106?currentPage=1):

> To my writing classes I used later to open by saying that anybody who could talk could also write. Having cheered them up with this easy-to-grasp ladder, I then replaced it with a a huge and loathsome snake: “How many people in this class can talk? I mean, really talk?” That had its duly woeful effect.

> I told them to read every composition aloud, preferably to a trusted friend. The rules are much the same: Avoid stock expressions (like the plague, as William Safire used to say) and repetitions. Don’t say that as a boy your grandmother used to read to you, unless at that stage of her life she really *was* a boy, in which case you have probably thrown away a better intro. If something is worth hearing or listening to, it’s very probably worth reading. So, this above all: Find your own *voice.*

College was the first time I started writing how I speak.

Or, more accurately, college was when I stopped trying to write the way I thought I *should* write. Whether through explicit instruction (topic sentences, Roman outlines) or imitative insecurity (we all had a Hemingway phase), any unique quality in my prose had been flattened. The occasional quirks were mostly borrowed from Spy magazine, whose pithy precision I worshipped without really understanding.

A freshman year newswriting class probably changed me more than anything. J54 taught us how to align fact-bearing sentences in a deliberate pyramid structure so that the story could be truncated at any point without losing its meaning.

We learned the rules. We wrote the articles. The process was almost automated; given the same facts, any two news writers should generate very much the same story.

I hated it. I revolted. Why should I waste my time writing something anyone else could have churned out?

Writing isn’t harder than speaking, but it’s lonelier. It’s a conversation with someone who isn’t there.

When you’re writing, you end up hearing your own voice a lot. I think that’s why so many people struggle with it. We don’t like to be alone with our thoughts. They scare us. But in the same way people don’t stutter when talking to a dog, it helps to envision a friendly reader at the far side. Let writing be talking with someone you like.

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Newsletter

Inneresting Logo A Quote-Unquote Newsletter about Writing
Read Now

Explore

Projects

  • Aladdin (1)
  • Arlo Finch (27)
  • Big Fish (88)
  • Birdigo (2)
  • Charlie (39)
  • Charlie's Angels (16)
  • Chosen (2)
  • Corpse Bride (9)
  • Dead Projects (18)
  • Frankenweenie (10)
  • Go (30)
  • Karateka (4)
  • Monsterpocalypse (3)
  • One Hit Kill (6)
  • Ops (6)
  • Preacher (2)
  • Prince of Persia (13)
  • Shazam (6)
  • Snake People (6)
  • Tarzan (5)
  • The Nines (118)
  • The Remnants (12)
  • The Variant (22)

Apps

  • Bronson (14)
  • FDX Reader (11)
  • Fountain (32)
  • Highland (73)
  • Less IMDb (4)
  • Weekend Read (64)

Recommended Reading

  • First Person (88)
  • Geek Alert (151)
  • WGA (162)
  • Workspace (19)

Screenwriting Q&A

  • Adaptation (66)
  • Directors (90)
  • Education (49)
  • Film Industry (492)
  • Formatting (130)
  • Genres (90)
  • Glossary (6)
  • Pitches (29)
  • Producers (59)
  • Psych 101 (119)
  • Rights and Copyright (96)
  • So-Called Experts (47)
  • Story and Plot (170)
  • Television (165)
  • Treatments (21)
  • Words on the page (238)
  • Writing Process (178)

More screenwriting Q&A at screenwriting.io

© 2025 John August — All Rights Reserved.