• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

John August

  • Arlo Finch
  • Scriptnotes
  • Library
  • Store
  • About

Film Industry

The problem of multiple screenwriters

September 10, 2003 Film Industry, QandA

On the first CHARLIE’S ANGELS, you came on after the original writers, and, though numerous writers worked on the script, you stayed on the whole time and were credited along with the first team (whose script, save for the opening scene, has no resemblance to the movie). On the second film you were the original writer, but another writing team came on after and shares screenplays credit. In the end, is it better to be the last writer on these types of projects?

–Barney

In the end, it’s better to be the only writer on a movie. That’s how it was with GO and BIG FISH, which turned out to be the best movies I’ve been involved with in any capacity. Unfortunately, One Writer per Movie doesn’t happen as often as it should. The problem is that any sort of absolute maxim – there must only be one screenwriter on a film – is unrealistic and probably detrimental.

The CHARLIE’S ANGELS movies show how the process works, for better and for worse.

I came on to CHARLIE’S ANGELS after the writing team of Ed Solomon & Ryan Rowe had done a draft. In fact, they weren’t even the first writers. The studio had hired others to write different versions as far back as the early 90’s. But Ed & Ryan wrote a brand new draft that had elements the studio liked, notably the opening sequence on the plane. The rest of their script revolved around cloning supermodels, and definitely reached further into the AUSTIN POWERS/MEN IN BLACK school of wide-angle comedy. I was brought on board when Drew Barrymore and Nancy Juvonen joined the project, with the mandate of finding not just a new plot, but a new tone.

I worked for the better part of a year on the script, which very closely mirrors the final movie. Just before production began, another producer informed me that they were planning to bring in a roundtable of comedy writers to “look for jokes.” After some heated words, I quit the project. During production, a revolving door of very talented writers came on board for a week at a time, making surprisingly few meaningful changes to the script. In the end, none of these subsequent writers sought credit on the movie, so Ed, Ryan and I agreed to share writing credit. It was all very civil.

I went into the sequel knowing it would be difficult. Although I have great affection for each member of the team individually, the combination of personalities makes it very turbulent – anyone on the production would agree with me. Both for the good of the project and for my emotional self-preservation, I adopted a judo-like attitude about my writing. I rolled with the changes, happy to try anything, and worked to build consensus among the many powerful voices. Ultimately, I was asked to squeeze the plot of the proposed third Charlie’s Angels (including the Madison Lee character) into the storyline, and I balked. The writing team of Cormac and Marianne Wibberley were hired to do the job, and did the best anyone could at an impossible task. I came back after them to patch some cracks, but ultimately remained frustrated the movie would be so overstuffed and underdeveloped.

Unlike the first movie, there wasn’t a slew of writers on the project, just two others. The arbitration for credit was remarkably civil, and the Wibberlys and I recorded a commentary track together for the DVD.

The CHARLIE’S ANGELS movies show the pros and cons of multiple writers on a project. The first movie would never have been made with Ed & Ryan’s script, so it’s hard to argue that hiring a subsequent writer (me) was detrimental. In my opinion, the second movie would have been considerably better had certain changes not been made, but if hiring other writers kept the production from falling apart, maybe that was ultimately for the best.

In the end, it’s hard for me to be too high-and-mighty about protecting the original writer. I’ve worked on BLUE STREAK, JURASSIC PARK III, MINORITY REPORT, THE RUNDOWN and other movies as the second, third or eighth writer. In many cases, it’s perfectly clear why these movies need rewriting. But I’ve refused work where I felt the studio was dumping a writer arbitrarily, and sought out the original writers wherever possible to find out what happened.

Nominated screenplays

September 10, 2003 Film Industry, QandA

When a Golden Globe or an Oscar is awarded to a writer, is it based on just
a viewing of the movie, or do the judges actually read the screenplays?

–Robert Baker

Not only is that a really good question, but strangely, I’ve never even stopped
to think about it until now.

While studios sometimes do send out certain screenplays to Academy or WGA
voters (as Disney did with THE ROYAL TENNENBAUMS this year), in the vast majority
of cases, voters are making their decision based only on the movie they saw,
rather than the script.

Anyone who’s been through the process of making a movie knows that a brilliant
script doesn’t necessarily translate into a brilliant movie. The screenplay
is a crucial first step, but the words get filtered through a director, actors,
editors and hundreds of other people who inevitably change the execution if
not the intention of the writer’s work.

If an actress improvises a horrible line of dialogue, the screenwriter inevitably
gets blamed. If the editor and director shuffle scenes so that logic falls
apart, it again looks like the writer’s mistake. So it’s no surprise that the
awards for screenwriting inevitably go to scripts that, for whatever reason,
turned out to be really good movies. That is, the movies where everyone else
didn’t screw up.

But should it really be that way? While I would hate to see forests decimated
just to send 30,000 unsolicited screenplays out to Academy or WGA voters, it
would be remarkably easy to post .pdf versions of nominated screenplays online
so that voters could actually read the material they’re judging. I’m calling
my WGA representative this afternoon.

Update: I called. It’s being considered. There’s some issue of possible fairness,
because some writers have "publication rights" on their scripts, and others
don’t for various reasons. But I strongly believe that making great screenplays
more widely available will boost the profile of screenwriters worldwide.

Being rewritten

September 10, 2003 Film Industry, QandA

I have written a script for a producer who says he will produce the film this
year. How exciting for me until I found out he has brought on another writer,
whose re-write is terrible. This would be my first credit, and wondered if
my chances at having a career are better with a produced script I don’t like,
or should I change my name for this one?

–B.U.

What a horrible situation. I’m sorry to hear you’re going through this. If
it’s any consolation, even more experienced writers with multiple credits find
themselves rewritten badly at times.

[Ahem.]

First and foremost, I don’t think you should take your name off the movie
until you see how it turns out. I speak from experience when I say that many
movies which seem doomed to suckdom somehow turn out better than expected.
A writing credit on a decent movie is better than no credit at all.

Also, a quick search through IMDb will reveal that many of today’s most respected
filmmakers have less-than-respectable credits. Ron Howard directed GRAND THEFT
AUTO. James Cameron directed PIRANHA II. They won Oscars,
eventually.

Since I don’t know all the details, I’m going to make some assumptions about
your situation. I’m guessing you’re not a member of the Writers Guild, and
that the producer is not a WGA signatory. (A signatory means that the producer
has signed an agreement with the WGA promising to abide by certain rules of
conduct.)

There are two reasons the WGA could be important here. First, the WGA guarantees
its members the right to use a pseudonym. Theoretically, this producer could
decide to use your name even if you didn’t want him to. Second, the WGA determines
final writing credits for movies under its jurisdiction. Since you were rewritten,
the issue of who deserves credit could come up. If the WGA is not involved
in the movie, the producer often determines credit by himself.

For now, assuming your relationship with the producer is decent, I’d hold
tight and see how the movie turns out.

Good writing vs. the idea

September 10, 2003 Film Industry, QandA

If your screenplay is good enough will that guarantee it recognition or is
it more in the selling of the idea?

–Brett

A screenplay that is "good
enough" won’t get any recognition at all.
Unless it has an ingeniously compelling (and marketable) idea, a script has
to be ungodly well-written to attract much attention. Of course, the best scripts
have both a brilliant idea and brilliant execution, but that’s not your question.

Let’s say you decide to write a family drama. Unless it’s about a family of
killer robots, the "idea" of the story is not what will make it sell.
So you better have some fantastic writing in there to make it compelling.

On the other hand, the family-of-killer-robots script could conceivably sell
even with some sub-par writing, if it does a good job presenting the idea and
studios happen to be in the market for killer robots with a twist. Here’s the
big difference between the two kinds of scripts: if you write a extremely well-written
script that no one buys, you’ve still written a great script. On the other
hand, if you write a crappy script (even with a great idea) and no one buys
it, all you have to show for it is a crappy script.

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Newsletter

Inneresting Logo A Quote-Unquote Newsletter about Writing
Read Now

Explore

Projects

  • Aladdin (1)
  • Arlo Finch (27)
  • Big Fish (88)
  • Birdigo (2)
  • Charlie (39)
  • Charlie's Angels (16)
  • Chosen (2)
  • Corpse Bride (9)
  • Dead Projects (18)
  • Frankenweenie (10)
  • Go (29)
  • Karateka (4)
  • Monsterpocalypse (3)
  • One Hit Kill (6)
  • Ops (6)
  • Preacher (2)
  • Prince of Persia (13)
  • Shazam (6)
  • Snake People (6)
  • Tarzan (5)
  • The Nines (118)
  • The Remnants (12)
  • The Variant (22)

Apps

  • Bronson (14)
  • FDX Reader (11)
  • Fountain (32)
  • Highland (73)
  • Less IMDb (4)
  • Weekend Read (64)

Recommended Reading

  • First Person (87)
  • Geek Alert (151)
  • WGA (162)
  • Workspace (19)

Screenwriting Q&A

  • Adaptation (65)
  • Directors (90)
  • Education (49)
  • Film Industry (489)
  • Formatting (128)
  • Genres (89)
  • Glossary (6)
  • Pitches (29)
  • Producers (59)
  • Psych 101 (118)
  • Rights and Copyright (96)
  • So-Called Experts (47)
  • Story and Plot (170)
  • Television (165)
  • Treatments (21)
  • Words on the page (237)
  • Writing Process (177)

More screenwriting Q&A at screenwriting.io

© 2026 John August — All Rights Reserved.