Secret history of the Kleinhardt Gambit

questionmarkIn the second Charlie’s Angels, where did the phrase “Kleinhardt gambit” come from?

– Duane
Mount Pleasant

Duane is referring to this scene, near the end of the movie:

EXT. HIGH ROOF – NIGHT

Madison finds herself alone on a high, empty roof. Reeling, confused. A giant, blinking “LOS ANGELES� SIGN flashes.

A single telescope has been set up near the edge. Madison walks to it. Leans down to the eyepiece.

HER P.O.V.

On a distant rooftop, all of her gangster clients are being arrested by the F.B.I.

CLOSE ON MADISON

as she looks up from the eyepiece. Furious, but smiling. She speaks to the only ones who could be behind this:

MADISON

The Kleinhardt Gambit. Classic. Well done.

WIDEN TO REVEAL the Angels, approaching behind her.

NATALIE

Thanks.

SMASHCUT to a series of FAST FLASHBACKS:

MUSSO AND FRANK’S. SNAP ZOOM TO THE COAT CHECK ROOM. THE COAT CHECKER IS NATALIE, WITH BLACK HAIR AND SLINKY BLACK DRESS.

ROOSEVELT HOTEL, BATHROOM. THE HISPANIC DOORMAN QUICKLY RIPS OFF HIS LATEX FACE, REVEALING DYLAN.

(Those last three are separate scene numbers, by the way.)

Here, the “Kleinhardt Gambit” refers to the way the angels sent Madison’s buyers to the wrong rooftop through elaborate misdirection. The telescope is apparently not a key part of the gambit, but rather just to piss off Madison.

The action is pretty standard for Charlie’s Angels (or Mission: Impossible), so it makes sense that a fallen angel would recognize how she was duped, and would have a term for it. The term itself is completely invented, a ridiculous neologism. And believe me, there wasn’t a lot of deep thought going into it. The first combination of syllables that seemed reasonable got typed.

Science fiction does this constantly. What’s a flux capacitor? How did Kirk prevail in the un-winnable Kobayashi Maru? What are midi-chlorians, and how can we pretend we never heard of them?

Don’t be afraid to invent terms you think would exist in your fictional world. Done just right, jargon helps ground characters in their setting, much the way medical-ese makes you think those pretty people on TV could actually be doctors.

  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
May 2, 2008 @ 8:28 am | Comments (18)
Filed under: Charlie's Angels, Projects, QandA, Words on the page

18 Responses to “Secret history of the Kleinhardt Gambit”

  1. Jeff

    As Clouseau would say…”ahhh, the old Kleinhardt Gambit routine… and I fell for it!”

  2. Paul Ramos

    John, A flux capacitor is just a glorified oscillation overthruster.

    Sorry.. I couldn’t resist.

  3. carol

    Is this the shooting script of the screenplay or your spec version? I ask because there are so many camera angles included: smash-cut, widen, close-up, her POV, etc…

    Can we do this? This is allowed? I’ve been trying to cut mine way back and would love it if I didn’t have to.

  4. John August

    @carol:

    Other than the addition of scene numbers, there’s no difference between a normal script and a shooting script. That’s a pervasive myth.

    This scene has a lot of specific direction to clarify who sees what, but in general, the Angels scripts are pretty camera-heavy.

  5. mike prince

    The old Kleinhardt Gambit… that’s so money!

  6. Grumpy

    You embiggen that neologism with your cromulent invention.

  7. David Anaxagoras

    Let’s not overlook the practicality of real-world applications. I was once virtually blocked from using the laundry room for a full day by a man using what my friends and I have come to call the “Chazinsky Lawn Chair Maneuver”.

    Oddly enough, the man was also a screenwriter.

  8. Blair Shedd

    “What’s a flux capacitor? How did Kirk prevail in the un-winnable Kobayashi Maru? What are midi-chlorians, and how can we pretend we never heard of them?”

    While I can’t answer the other two (and midichlorians just make me cry) — my geek hat says that Kirk “passed” the no-win situation of the Kobayashi Maru by reprogramming the simulator so you could win. Granted, that doesn’t state exactly what he did, and technically isn’t truly beating it, but the explanation was in “Wrath of Khan”.

    Now, how did he program it? I imagine it was up, up, down, down, left, right, left, right, B, A, start. He then had thirty lives to do with what he wished.

  9. Synthian

    This is such an awesome string of comments. :)

    I think if we could just HARNESS all this geek power, we’d probably have enough collectively to cross the Time Meridian.

  10. james

    @ blair

    “select, start” ;)

  11. Kevin Lehane

    Blair, they explain that in the new JJ Star Trek. It involves Kirk and a Blue Girlfriend.

    It’s a great script and a funny sequence.

  12. Kevin Lehane

    By the way, John, may I ask why you choose to write the flashbacks in ALL-CAPS. I’m wondering if this is a stylistic choice or done for technical reasons.

  13. Blair Shedd

    james — Dammit! I forgot select! That actually happened to me a lot back when I was playing it… whoops.

    Kevin — Cool. I wondered if they’d touch on that.

  14. John August

    @Kevin:

    The all-caps was to save space. Those aren’t really new scenes, but single shots from things we’d just seen, so keeping them as long sluglines made sense.

  15. Kevin Lehane

    Ah, I see. Thanks, John.

  16. Mike Rinaldi

    The cosmis Roger Rabbit rip-off known as Jar Jar Binks was annoying, but at least he didn’t ruin the Star Wars mythos. It was those damned midi-chlorians!

  17. Madrugada Jones

    I’ve written some screenplays in the past and am now working on a (non sci-fi) novel. I’ve been tempted at several points to make up words just because they seemed right. Case in point, the word “ribbled”. This is not a word. But I wrote a scene where an old guy sits reading a novel and his hair is all askew, only I didn’t want to use the word “askew”. For some reason “ribbled” popped into my mind. Do you ever make up words in the expository/scene description parts of your screenplays?

    http://spinachflame.wordpress.com/

  18. Jeff

    Hey Madrugada, big Steve King does it all the time! Case in point, check out Lisey’s Story for some REAL voyages down the byways of the language. Can’t wait to the screen adaptation of that one… “smucking bool!!!”

 

About

This site is run by screenwriter John August. Mostly, he answers reader-submitted questions about the craft, but occasionally he goes on tangents that run far afield of writing and filmmaking. You'll also find info on past, present and future projects.

Follow Me

On Twitter: @johnaugust

Ask a Question

If you have a question about screenwriting or my movies that hasn't been answered, by all means ask. There are a few guidelines to follow.

Featured Articles

101: Some screenwriting basics


There are more than 900 articles on the site. You can find category archives at the bottom of every page.

Read Me

  • The Variant
  • A new short story available for download, Kindle and iPhone.

Feeds