• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

John August

  • Arlo Finch
  • Scriptnotes
  • Library
  • Store
  • About

Search Results for: outline

Scriptnotes, Episode 713: Your First Produced Film, Transcript

December 10, 2025 Scriptnotes Transcript

The original post for this episode can be found here.

John August: Hey, this is John. Standard warning for people who are in the car with their kids, there’s some swearing in this episode.

[music]

John: Hello, and welcome. My name is John August, and you’re listening to Episode 713 of Scriptnotes. It’s a podcast about screenwriting and things that are interesting to screenwriters.

Often on this podcast, we speak with writers who have decades of experience in the industry, and while there’s definitely wisdom to be gained there, it’s perhaps not so relevant to listeners who are just getting started in the business as it operates now in 2025. Today on the show, we are talking with a writing team who graduated from Loyola Marymount in 2018 and then went through a variety of jobs both inside and outside the industry. This year, their first film debuted, KPop Demon Hunters, was a worldwide phenomenon, top of the Netflix charts, culturally inescapable for a while this summer. Welcome and congratulations to Danya Jimenez and Hannah McMechan, our guests on Scriptnotes. Welcome, guys.

Danya Jimenez: Thank you.

Hannah McMechan: Thank you.

John: I’m excited to talk with you about your journey from film school to now because it’s much more recent than a lot of other guests have been, but also just the process of going from, I’m in film school to now I’m being paid to write, to I now have a thing coming out in the world where people can see. I want to talk about day jobs. I want to talk about moments where you thought about giving up. I want to talk about collaboration and your process of working together.

In our bonus segment for premium members, I want to talk about what Hollywood gets wrong about Gen Z and portrayals of Gen Z and things that could be better or just misassumptions that are going to happen here. Let’s get started. Talk to us about where you guys first met, what you guys were writing separately. Danya, let’s start with you. Why did you end up at Loyola Marymount? What was the process that got you there?

Danya: I realized later on that I wanted to write for TV and film. All of my friends were doing political science, business. Those were the degrees that they were chasing after. I remember telling my college counselor that I was going to do the same thing, and she was like, “You cannot do that.” She was like, “I will actually talk to your parents because this would be a huge mistake.”

John: What did this counselor see in you that you weren’t seeing yourself?

Danya: I don’t know. That’s a really good question. I think she just saw that, oh, we had a lot of fun writing my college essays, they were very creative, and I never said, “We should be more serious.” I think she was like, “Oh, you should just do this.” She knew that I would never do my homework. I would always watch TV and film up until like 4:00 AM, and then that’s when I would get to do my homework.

John: You were procrastinating film buff, and she thought, “Well, that should be a film student.”

Danya: Yes. She put all of the pieces together before I did. I also didn’t even know that this was a job that you could have.

John: Nor did I until I actually was in college. It’s good that somebody tipped you off with this beforehand. You were aware that movies were written probably, but not that it was a job you could have.

Danya: Yes, I was like, “That’s not my business. I don’t know who’s doing that, but it certainly would not be me.” It wasn’t until I watched, this is the randomest movie to mention, but I always give it a shout out, No Strings Attached.

John: Sure.

Danya: I watched that a few times, and I was talking to my dad about it. I was like, “Yes, that job seems incredible,” even though he’s having the worst time in that movie being a writer’s assistant or a writer. I don’t even know. My dad was like, “Yes, that’s a job that you can have. I think you could do it if you wanted to.” I was like, “Oh, I should look into that,” even though, again, he was miserable in that, and I was like, “I want to do that.”

John: Hannah, talk to us about this. When did you decide, “Okay, maybe film school is the thing for me”?

Hannah: I was like a more serious type writer girl. I was really into novels. I remember being so young, I truly think whenever Microsoft Word first came out-

John: Oh, Microsoft Word’s been out forever. Microsoft Word is older than you, but-

Hannah: Oh, yes.

John: -you were writing. You were always typing.

Hannah: Yes. I remember being a child, child, and just writing books on Microsoft Word on my parents’ computer.

John: Books, how many were you writing?

Hannah: I was doing chapters-

John: Incredible.

Hannah: -of just, I don’t even know what because it was so long ago, but I really loved it. Then I started hearing as I got older, like, “Oh, you can’t make money writing books.” Then I was like, “Oh, well, how can I make money writing”? Then at the same time, I also loved movies and TV shows, but I also didn’t know that that was a job. Then I think when I was applying to colleges, I was like, “Oh, maybe I combine it? Maybe it’s easier to break into the film industry,” is what I was thinking at the time. I was like, “Oh, this is a smart practical choice is to, instead of writing novels, I’ll try to make it in the film and TV industry,” which realized later was not the case-

John: Absolutely.

Hannah: -but at the time, I was like, “This is better than novel writing.”

John: Hannah, what was the first screenplay you read?

Hannah: I actually think it was The Social Network, because we had to read it in one of our film classes in college.

Danya: Wow. I can’t believe you remember that.

John: Was that the same for you, Danya? Did you read any before that?

Danya: I could not even guess. What my first script was that I read, I have no idea. I just remember scripts that I did read when I was younger, like in internships and stuff like that. I read Nocturnal Animals. It was random.

John: Interesting one to be the first screenplay you read.

Danya: What’s the other one that was with Shailene Woodley, and it’s a really short script because it all takes place on a boat, and I think it’s 40 pages long?

Hannah: Oh.

Danya: It was all–

Hannah: She’s stranded in the water?

Danya: Yes. That one was really interesting to read, too.

John: Growing up in the age of the internet, you could have Googled and found scripts for anything, but you didn’t really do it until you had academic requirement to start doing it, and I’m always curious about–

Hannah: I think I truly was like, movies are made while they’re shooting it. They just have an idea. I didn’t know that scripts were a thing.

John: Nor did I. It is weird how we grew up reading plays in English class. There’s a play, and all the actors are saying the lines are in the play. We’re in plays, and we see all that stuff. We just don’t associate, oh, there’s the same underlying document behind a movie until you read it, and you’re like, “Oh my gosh, that’s the script.” The first script I read, I’ve said this on podcast many, many times, was Steven Soderbergh’s script for Sex, Life, and Videotape was published in a book along with his journal, and so I could actually watch the videotape and flip through the thing.

Oh my gosh, everything they’re saying and doing is there on the script. It’s such a revelation. It’s just like, “Oh, there really was a plan. There are blueprints behind this building.” It’s so exciting to see that. You guys both decided to go to school to do that, and often on the podcast, we are dismissive of what you learn in film schools, but tell me what you learned in film schools and how it was helpful and how it got you guys together. Danya, to start with this, what are the classes you were taking in Loyola Marymount film program? This is undergrad, basically, right?

Danya: Yes, undergrad. I really liked the film history ones, watching in the theater all the old movies, even though I did not talk shit on it. We just did a LMU Q&A session after watching K-pop, and I did say that I fell asleep a lot in that theater, but I did enjoy watching all these old movies that I wouldn’t– or even not old movies. I watched In the Mood for Love in that theater, and I remember being like, “Holy shit, this is the craziest thing I’ve ever seen.” Just so beautiful.

John: Let’s talk about that. One of the advantages of going through a film program is you’re required to watch some things that are outside of your normal area of interest, which can be really good. It also helps you develop your taste, what you find interesting, what clicks with you, and if something’s not clicking with you, makes you introspect and figure out why it’s not clicking with you. You’re forced to respond to things you would otherwise never see, so that feels good. When were you first writing, though, in these programs? Hannah, what was the first thing you needed to write? Was it a general film and TV degree, or was it specifically a screenwriting degree that you were getting?

Hannah: Our school was specifically screenwriting-

John: Wow.

Hannah: -which is cool because there’s not a lot of colleges that offer specifically screenwriting, but I think we didn’t immediately jump into write a full feature, write a full pilot. It was we were doing scenes at first.

John: That sounds like the right plan. Can you give me a sense of what is the prompt for a scene? What would you need to go off to to write? Was it within a genre, or was it, “Here are the characters”? Talk to me about that.

Hannah: I’m trying to remember.

Danya: I’m surprised you remember that. I’m like, “Yes, that totally–“

Hannah: You know my memory. I don’t know if he– I’m saying “he” because most of our professors were men. I’m trying to remember if there was a prompt. I don’t know if there was. I think it was whatever you want to write about, write a scene, and there might have been a theme of like, “What is the emotion? Here’s an emotion that you guys should be writing about.”

Danya: Oh, yes, I just remembered this. That brought me back.

Hannah: Yes, but they were pretty vague. I think everything was pretty vague. I feel like the best part of going to film school was your friends more than the actual curriculum. Not to say that the curriculum isn’t great because they do force you to write, but it’s not like you’re really being taught anything that you don’t already have within you. They’re just forcing you to have a deadline, so that forces you to write, which is the hardest part.

Danya: Even structure, you can look these things up. You can buy books, but yes, the professors were great. They’re very supportive, very friendly, I would say, which is different from, I don’t know, what I heard about most film schools, that it’s very cutthroat. Ours was very like, “We’re all here together. We’re all going to do it collaboratively.”

Hannah: Yes, which made everybody in the program really close to each other, which helped later, because then you all get into the film industry together and you’re all helping each other versus having weird animosity towards each other.

John: Drew and I both went through the Stark program at USC, which is a graduate-level producing program. We definitely learned a lot in the class, but it was having that group of 25 students who were doing the same things, who were graduating at the same time, was incredibly helpful in terms of just the shared knowledge you had and the connections you had entering into the industry.

I do want to go back to, though, the writing you were doing in those classes, because we had Scott Frank on the podcast talking about theoretically if he were to open up a screenwriting school, how he’d want to do it, and it was very scene-based, that he was frustrated that a lot of the film and TV education about writing is like, “Okay, now write a pilot. Now write a feature.” It’s just like you need to start on a granular level with what is happening in a scene, what are these two characters attempting to do, how do you build out from that? Any of the things you wrote in that class or while you were in film school, did they become anything? Did they become samples? What was helpful about that writing? What came out of that?

Danya: Oh, yes. Honestly, a lot of the things we wrote there, not that they were produced, but they got us our agents, managers. They’ve gotten us jobs before.

Hannah: Yes, we still send stuff that we wrote in college as a sample for staffing. I will say nothing that we wrote separately has ever been sent out into the world or is usable, but once we started writing together, it was like, “Oh, these are good things, let’s keep using those.” Yes, there are things that to this day will get us staff that we wrote senior year of college together.

John: Meeting up with your writing partner in college is a very classic way things start, but you guys are separate students, so you both had to do your own work, but when did you start actually writing together?

Danya: We would have our own assignments that we were technically writing on our own, but we were both writing them together behind the scenes. I think one of our professors knew that we were doing this.

Hannah: Yes, but that didn’t start until senior year, but we found out that we should write together junior year. Then that senior year is when, yes, once we came back from study abroad, we were like, “We’re going to cheat the system and write all of our things together so that we can use them when we graduate.”

Danya: I remember getting our grades back for our scripts, and if one of us got a better grade, I was like, “Well, that’s annoying. We wrote that together.”

[laughter]

Danya: “It’s not fair,” but yes, it was worth it.

John: Talk about the early dynamic of being a writing team and what’s progressed over the years, because we’ve had a lot of teams on the show, and sometimes one person’s at the keyboard and one person’s at the side. Sometimes they completely write separately and then they pass documents back and forth between each other. What are you guys like? What works well for you? How did you discover what works well for you?

Danya: We kind of do it all, just depending on the deadline and the project. If we think it’s more comedy-based, then we will try to write it together because we will riff.

John: In person together?

Danya: Yes. Always try to do it in person, but we’ve started doing Zoom.

Hannah: I know. If things are piling up and there’s a lot of things that are due around the same time, then we’ll just split it up and do it completely separate, and then we’ll swap, but if we have time, it is a comedy, and so we want it to be really fun, then we’ll really try to write it together just because it turns out so much better if we’re riffing off of each other in person versus by yourself writing a scene. It just is never as funny.

Danya: Yes, or we’ll write it separately and just deal with the structure part, which is what sucks. Sorry. Then we’ll get together and punch it up, and that’s a reward for doing it by yourself.

John: Write it separately. Write scenes separately and stick them together or just completely different takes on how to do something and then you have to figure out what the–

Danya: Oh no. We’ll split it in half. We’ll be like, “I’ll do the second half, you the first half,” or we’ll do scene by scene.

Hannah: We’ll do the structure together. We’ll outline the whole thing just so that at least we’re on the same page about that, and then, yes.

John: Divvy up the scenes. The very few times I’ve had to write with a partner, that’s the approach we’ve taken, and you agree on outline, then you’re doing separate scenes. Most of the times, it works well together, as long as you realize, “Oh, that beat you were going for on yours, I also did in mine,” and so something has to move back and forth, but you can figure it out.

Hannah: The hard part about that, too, is if you’re writing and then you’re like, “Oh my God, I have this really cool idea, and so now I’m going to seed it in here, and so I need to make sure that she knows to pay it off later.” I feel like stuff like that, like runners, jokes that you want to be building off of, that’s really hard to do separate because then it’s just like you’re setting up a whole thing that’s never going to be paid off in the exact way that you’ve seen it in your head.

Danya: Yes. Also, it’s fun reading each other’s pages and being surprised by jokes.

Hannah: That’s true, yes.

Danya: We’ve been crying, laughing at each other’s things just as a little surprise.

John: Let’s go back to you’re graduating from Loyola Marymount. You’re here in Los Angeles. Are we both from LA? Where were you coming from?

Danya: I’m from Orange County.

Hannah: I’m from right outside of Yosemite.

John: Okay. You graduated. You’re deciding to stay in LA. You’re not moving back to where you came from?

Hannah: No.

John: Is that now what happened?

Hannah: Oh my God. I’m like, I could not go back to my town. There’s like 5,000 people in the whole place. I think we both were very delusional, and that has helped us, and so I think we both were like, “We’re going to make it. We’re obviously going to make it.” Once we started writing together, the pilot that we wrote together our junior year, got us into the Black List Women in Film Lab our senior year of college. After that, that just fed into our delusions because we were like, “Well, we’re amazing writers, and they think so,” so yes, when we graduated, we were very much– and after we got into that program, we sent cold emails to everyone in the industry with that script.

John: You say everyone in the industry. How many people were you sending emails to?

Danya: Oh, so many people.

John: More than 100?

Danya: IMDbPro is scary to have access to.

Hannah: It was probably like 200 emails.

John: Wow.

Danya: Just copy and paste. It wasn’t like a cover letter that we’re–

Hannah: No.

Danya: No. Just generic.

John: You’re saying, “Hey, we’re this writing team. We’re in the Women in Film Black List program.”

Hannah: Yes. That was in the subject line so that they opened it, actually.

John: Short thing about who you are, what zone you’re in terms of how they should consider you and that script, or what were you sending through?

Hannah: Yes, we sent the script that we went through the program with.

Danya: I think we sent it as a link so that people wouldn’t see an attachment and be terrified of the email. It was like a secret insert.

Hannah: Yes, we were really strategic about it, and we tried to only email assistants at agencies and management companies instead of the actual agent and manager, so, hopefully, the assistant would open it, read it, and be like, “I’m going to recommend this to my boss,” which didn’t end up happening for some places, but it worked out because one of the places we sent it to, he turned out to be the head of Lit at Abrams. We didn’t know that we had accidentally sent it to him, but he was the one that actually opened it, brought us in. This was our senior year.

Danya: We were still in college, yes.

Hannah: We were still in college. We graduated with an agent hit-pocketing us. I think that was like, “Oh, we’re on the right path. We’re not giving up, because everything’s kind of–“

John: I just wanted to define terms for people who don’t know. Hit-pocketing means that they haven’t officially signed you as a client, but they’re– put you out there in the world, and if that deal happens, then you’re going to be a client. Just sort of a not full and official, but sort of yes, we’re rooting for you. It’s a common way for things to start out as an agency relationship. Talk us through that interest from Abrams, that sort of sense because it’s got to be just weird to be a college senior who has an agent and it seems like, “Oh, this is all going to click and work.” Was there jealousy among your classmates? Were you not sharing that news? It feels like a big deal.

Danya: Yes. We were living at the time with all of our best friends in one house, and we’d be like, “Okay, here we go, off to Beverly Hills.” I think everyone was happy for us. Everyone in the house was doing different stuff. We had actors. We had directors. No one was a writer, really.

Hannah: Yes, but I will say, even though we technically were signed, and we also got a manager, too, because he hooked us up with our manager, we thought, “Oh, we’re going to immediately be working in the industry,” but that didn’t happen. For the first eight months that we were post-grad but signed, we were really confused, we were like, “How can you be signed and not have [crosstalk]?

John: Yes, be working. Totally.

Hannah: Then we became substitute teachers. I feel like it was a weird contradiction of we’re these fresh-out-of-college signed writers, which feels very hard to do, but we’re substitute teaching. It was a weird disconnect where we were so excited and felt so good about ourselves, but also we’re going to teach kindergartners that were pooping their pants every day and writing after work.

Danya: If there was jealousy, it was immediately gone once they saw us waking up at–

John: Yes, because that’s the natural toiling of it all.

Danya: Oh, yes.

John: A couple questions about substitute teaching. First off, can you be that unqualified and be a substitute teacher? Because you don’t have to have an education degree.

Danya: Oh, absolutely not, and you should not be teaching. I’ll say that. I was teaching high schoolers, and I was like, “I should not be here.”

John: I think of substitute teachers are often babysitting, but you don’t even have the necessary skill set for that. How do you get hired as a substitute teacher?

Danya: It is so easy.

John: What do you do?

Danya: The first thing you need is a bachelor’s degree, actually.

John: You got that.

Hannah: Yes.

Danya: Then you need to take the CBEST test.

Hannah: That’s basically like the PSAT. It’s the easiest test in the world. It takes like an hour. It’s truly probably like second-grade level stuff.

Danya: We were stressed about it, though. I remember we were at the laundromat doing a practice test as we were doing our laundry.

Hannah: We were stressed, but that’s because we’re really bad at science and math.

Danya: Yes, that’s true. Not a strong suit.

John: I love taking tests, and I miss taking tests. I loved standardized tests. Now I’m thinking, like, we’re going to take the CBEST test. You’re going to be a substitute teacher. Absolutely. It’s my calling.

Danya: It’s honestly a really fun job. It was traumatic in a lot of ways, but so fun.

John: Does it pay at all?

Danya: Yes.

Hannah: Yes.

John: How much do you get for a day of substitute teaching? Like if filling in at a kindergarten, filling in a high school, are you making–

Hannah: I think it was literally like $150 a day, which at the time we were like, “Oh my God, you can’t get this anywhere.”

Danya: You’d be done early. You’d be done latest 3:00 PM.

Hannah: Yes. Then we’d go to WeWork after–

Danya: Which we had a free membership.

Hannah: Yes, through the Black List because we love them. They’re our biggest supporters. We would go to school 7:00 AM, off at 3:00 PM, go write our own stuff on the side. We did that for eight months, which at the time felt like no one had struggled as long as we had, which is so not true, but at the time we were like, “Oh my God, this is taking forever. When are we going to make it?” Then we finally got our first paid writing gig and luckily never had to go back to substitute teaching.

John: Let’s go back to the Black List Women in Film program. What did it actually consist of? You applied to it with this script. You got into the program, but what were you actually doing in the program? How often were you meeting? Who were you meeting with? What were the things you were doing over the course of that program?

Danya: We were meeting, was it twice a week for a month, I think, and we would go to Hollywood to NeueHouse. They were there first, which was super fancy. It was way more social, I would say, than working on your script that you got in for, which I think was incredible because that’s what we were there for, to make all these connections. We didn’t know what agents and managers were, the difference between them. We didn’t know what generals were. They did a lot of mock generals for us with actual execs. They had showrunners come in and talk to us. We had like– who did we have come in that was so cool?

Hannah: Jenny Connor.

John: She’s great.

Hannah: Yes, she’s great. Ah, no, I’m not going to remember anybody’s name.

Danya: Like Sex and the City, Mad Men.

Hannah: Yes, just really, really big showrunners and cool execs from every studio, and they just put all of us ladies in front of them and really just taught us how the industry worked. Once we got in, it was like, “Your script, who cares? We’re going to teach you how to operate.”

John: All the other things. It was teaching you the business and the ethos of it, just how it feels to be in the industry, which is really important also because you’re coming right out of undergrad, so you’re still fresh baked in terms of you’re not used to the working world, and so it’s good for you to have that exposure. Let’s now fast forward to, you’ve been substitute teaching. You are now, is it your agents, your managers? Who is getting you into the media, into your first paid job?

Danya: We actually got that through a student at LMU, who’s– honestly, she was more of an acquaintance at the time. She was one of our best friend’s friend, and she was the youngest assistant at Sony at the time or something. I’m pretty sure she was doing that while she was a senior in college. Her boss, Alex Zahn, who’s now at Netflix– Her name is [unintelligible 00:24:08], by the way. She’s also still in the industry. She told us that Alex was looking for a Latino script. Super vague. We’re like, “No worries.”

John: Yes, sure. Absolutely.

Danya: “We’ve got you,” which we didn’t. We actually had never written a feature together at that time. We went to a diner and wrote a feature in a week, and we mean it when we say a week because it was bad. It was a long pilot. There was no descriptions. The action lines were so, so basic, but her boss read it and liked it, and so he’s like, “I’d love for you guys to come in.”

We went to Sony and me and Hannah were like, “Wow, we are selling this thing. We’re doing it.” Then he was like, “Yes, this script is not going to happen. However, I have this rewrite assignment that I think you guys would be good for.” We’re like, “Okay, totally.” We pretty much pitched on this rewrite for, I want to say like two weeks. We were just going back and forth, because he really needed to trust that we could do it, so we were doing way more than I think a normal rewrite would require before being hired.

Hannah: Yes. I think he just really liked us and liked how we wrote, but also knew that we were so young and so inexperienced that if he was to convince his boss to hire us, he would need basically the entire script written before we got hired, and so he really put his neck on the line for us, which is incredible. We owe so much to him because if he had never given us that first writing credit, I don’t think we would have been validated to get anything else after.

Danya: It also gave us a lot of confidence, I feel like, because it was a studio job. We were going to Sony. I don’t know. As far as we feel.

Hannah: Yes, that wasn’t our agents at all. It was just our connections from college and hearsay. I also think what we did in the beginning that helped so much is if we truly heard anything that anyone was looking for, we went and we wrote it in a week because that’s how crazy we were, and I think that that’s something that you really have to be willing to do is to actually not sleep for a week and write something, even if it’s bad, just because I think that not everyone does that, and they don’t have the material when it comes time to give it to someone.

Danya: It’s also a lot easier to do with a writing partner because you’re both being anti-social losers together. Especially when we were really young and all of our friends were going out partying and stuff and we were just like, “Here we go, to WeWork on a Friday, on a Saturday.”

John: The Friday nights at home writing in my early 20s were very productive, but also very anti-social. It’s a real reality. You guys are 22, 23 as you’re starting to do this. That is the era which is like you don’t need sleep. You just crank, and that’s great. This project at Sony, it’s a rewrite at Sony. You get this job to do a rewrite probably at scale or something. It’s a small amount of money, but enough money, and it’s an actual, real job job. What was it like going from, “Okay, we can write a script” to like, “Okay, now we have to deal with notes from a person who’s actually telling us what they want and what to do”? Did you end up feeling good about the script that was finally delivered?

Danya: No. It was as good as I think we could have made it with the concept itself. It was not something that we would normally write ourselves. It was more of like a melodrama. The first draft that we wrote was horrific. We sent it to our manager and he was so panicked. We have the chillest manager, like such a, sorry, Drew, frat star. He called us at, I want to say 11:00 PM and he’s like, “Okay, we’re going to go through this whole thing and figure this out,” because it was so, so bad. I think the night before we had to send it in, we rewrote the entire thing.

Hannah: Yes. It was definitely the most stressful experience of our life, having to go from writing for fun to writing for paid work, and yes, because we hadn’t really written features before and we were hired for a feature, the first draft was 135-something pages.

John: That’s long.

Hannah: It was just so meandering. We had no idea what a structure for a feature was supposed to be because the only other one we had written was that diner script that we wrote in a week to get this project. Yes, our poor manager was like, “This is due next week?” and we were like, “Yes.” He’s like, “Oh my God.”

Danya: We didn’t know that you could push– He gave us four weeks, which is–

John: That’s a crazy amount of time.

Danya: It’s a crazy amount of time, and we didn’t know that we could be like, “Hey, actually, I think we need more time,” so we were like, “Fuck, okay, it’s due tomorrow. A hard deadline, we’re going to get a bad grade.” I don’t know why we were so [crosstalk] about it.

Hannah: Yes. We didn’t know anything.

Danya: No.

John: You’re now paid writers, and so you’re getting some money, not enough to get into Guild or get insurance or any of that stuff yet, but you’re getting some money. Then were you just taking other meetings? How are you going from that? I have to suspect that both your manager and your agent are very excited they can now market you as people like, “They’re coming off a job at Sony.” It makes it much easier for them to get you on the list for other things. Were you aiming for other feature stuff, for TV staffing, anything? What was your mandate to them?

Danya: We really wanted to staff on a show bad, because we’re pretty social, and I think at the time, it was like Pen15 had just come out.

John: Oh my God, what an incredible show.

Danya: We were like, “Obviously, we’re going to get on that.” That was our mindset. Yes, we were like, “Please submit us places, anything. We’ll do anything.” We did roundtables. We did punch-ups.

John: Let’s talk through for people who are listening. Roundtables, you’re bringing in a bunch of writers to look at a script that is somewhere in development, or maybe it’s heading into production, and so you are talking through the stuff, making suggestions for things that can improve. Sometimes you’re even doing a little reading of the script there as you’re starting to do the work, versus punch-ups, which is you’re just looking for joke, joke, joke, joke, joke. Both of those are one-day situations, they’re paying you a grand, a couple grand, not much.

Danya: No, even less than that.

John: It was an opportunity for you to be in the room with other writers and executives who were noticing, like, “Oh, they’re funny,” or whatever, and hopefully they’re going to use you for other projects down the road.

Danya: Yes, exactly that.

John: They can be a grind, they can be a trap, they can be a problem, but it’s very reasonable for you guys to have taken those jobs when you took them. You have the money from this one Sony rewrite, and you’re just stringing that along and trying to find the next paid gig. What ended up being your next paid gigs?

Danya: We did one roundtable for American Pie Girls’ Rule. That was like a female youth pass because two older men had written it. Our friend actually ended up being in the movie, Natasha Behnam, which was really cute. Then we did one youth punch-up for that animated movie. What’s that called? Ron’s Gone Wrong?

Hannah: Oh my God, I forgot about that. Yes, we did.

John: When you say that kind of punch-up, how long were you working on that?

Hannah: I think they just sent us the script. Yes, that one, we didn’t have to go in person. They just sent us the script, we read it, and we gave–

Danya: No, we did go. We gave notes in person. Remember, that’s where we met Andrew.

Hannah: Oh, okay, but we got the script ahead of time and got to read it and then come in prepared. Then I think the next thing we got was the Disney Channel writers’ room, which that truly felt like the first real, real job because you’re going in every day, nine to five. It lasted, honestly, almost a full year.

Danya: It was a Disney Channel show, so lots of episodes, but then also the pandemic extended that.

Hannah: Yes. We got our own episode, which was so cool to get at that age. I think we were– were we 23 or 22 when we got hired for that?

Danya: Yes.

Hannah: It really felt like, “Okay, this is finally, we’re set a little bit in the industry.”

John: One challenge, though, of course, is you’re splitting a salary, so it’s great that you’re getting paid some, but it’s going half and half, and money goes out to your manager and to your agent, so it’s challenging on those fronts to make that all connect, but it’s great that you have an ongoing, having a sense that this is your actual job that you’re showing up for is so validating and so important. What are the steps between here and KPop Demon Hunters, and did you have any sense that it was going to be a thing, thing when you were first meeting on it?

Danya: While we were in the Disney Channel writers’ room, that– wow, you’re going to be so happy with it. Hannah’s always dying to tell this full circle moment. Actually, you know what? You tell it.

Hannah: Okay.

Danya: This is your moment to shine.

Hannah: It’ll finally hit.

Danya: Because everything’s been set up.

Hannah: I know. It’s already been set up.

Danya: You don’t have to do it. Okay.

Hannah: Normally, I have to set up the diner script, but we’ve already set it up. That diner script that we wrote in a week for that one exec, we continued to edit that and work on it over the next year or so because we did really love it. The first draft was awful, but eventually it got to a good place, and we submitted it to the Sundance Feature Lab. We got into the Sundance Feature Lab with that script while we were in the Disney Channel writers’ room, and so we went out there. Luckily, our showrunners let us take a week off. We went out there, and one of our–

John: Is this while it was still in Utah, or had it moved to Colorado at that point?

Hannah: Utah?

Danya: Yes. Park City, yes.

Hannah: Yes, Park City.

John: Park City. This is the winter lab or the summer lab?

Danya: Winter.

Hannah: Winter. It was 2018 or 2019?

Danya: 2019. Yes, it was in January of 2019.

Hannah: Yes. Right before the pandemic. This was when we were hearing that it was in Washington for the first time. That was that Sundance.

Danya: It was actually Ground Zero at that time.

Hannah: Yes.

Danya: We knew a lot of people.

Hannah: We didn’t realize that was Ground Zero. Anyways, one of our mentors at this program was Nicole Perlman.

John: Who’s fantastic. She’s been on the podcast before.

Danya: Oh my God.

Hannah: Nicole is terrific. She did Guardians of the Galaxy. She’s worked a bunch on really beloved sci-fi fantasy shows, and she’s an absolute dream. One of the things that I’ve adopted from her is the idea of a writing sprint, which is basically you set a timer for 60 minutes, and the next 60 minutes you’re going to write. Nicole pioneered, just on Twitter, she would say, “I’m starting a writing sprint at the top of the hour. Who wants to join me?” and so you just join in. It’s good to have other people were writing along with you.

Danya: She’s so cool. We owe her, honestly, everything.

Hannah: We do. We always keep forgetting to thank her. We’re always like, “We should thank her.”

Danya: This is our moment. Thank you.

Hannah: Hopefully, she listens to this. She was our mentor, and she read our script, which our script was raunchy, rated-R, live action. She was like, “You know what? You guys would be perfect for this movie that I’m EPing called Untitled KPop Demon Hunters,” which the name has never changed, and that was five years ago. We were like, “That’s so interesting. What is it?” She’s like, “It’s a kids animated movie about K-pop.” We were like, “That is not what we do. That’s not really what we want to do, but we’re also 23, and so we will do it.”

John: Always say yes. Yes.

Hannah: Yes.

Danya: Yes, always.

Hannah: She recommended us to Maggie, the director. We came back from the program, and we immediately pitched, went to Sony, pitched to Maggie and the producers. Our pitch was terrible. It really, really sucked. It was not an animated movie.

John: Let’s talk about why. You read the script. You read Maggie’s existing script.

Hannah: No, there was no script.

John: There was a concept space. Okay, but not a script. All right.

Hannah: Yes, it sucked because animated movies, they need to be big. I guess that was the main thing.

Danya: Also, we had just written one feature at this point. That’s important to note. It was live action, and it was for Sundance. Now we’re being asked to go in and pitch on a Sony animated movie. Millions of dollars. Huge difference. I think what we pitched, if it were live action, it would be less than $1 million. I think it took place in one home. The finale was a pool party.

Also, the K-pop aspect of it was all wrong, too, because we had watched maybe one video and we thought, “Okay, they’re dancing in this one video.” Obviously, in other videos, they have instruments. Duh. We pitched all of them with guitars, drums, all this stuff. Maggie was like, “Okay, so no to all of this, essentially, but I like your guys’ voice.” She was writing a movie about three girls in their 20s that were roommates and best friends and coworkers. At the time, we were also living together. It was just a really easy match, I would say.

Hannah: It was a personality high.

Danya: It was a personality high.

Hannah: It worked out so well because we felt so connected to the girls. Everything else, she was kind of like, “You can learn about K-pop. You can learn about what it means to write for animation, but I like your voice. I like your vibe. That’s what I’ve been looking for,” because I think she’d been interviewing a lot of older men with the right credits and stuff. I think what she couldn’t find was the voice.

We really lucked out, because we didn’t have the credits, and we didn’t have the structure or even a good pitch, but we had the vibe. Then, yes, everything else came later. We learned about K-pop later. We learned about how to write for animation later, all that stuff. Yes, in the beginning, it was just like, she was like, “I trust you. I’m going to take a chance on you,” and it worked out.

Danya: I will say it’s also very important to mention that we did become K-pop stans. I don’t want anyone to come for us. She told us to watch maybe one K-pop video and maybe a K-drama. It’s called a K-hole. There’s obviously the drug one and then there’s a K-pop one. We entered K-holes, spent thousands of dollars on our boys, tickets, merch.

Hannah: Yes, just so that no one thinks we’re not K-pop stans.

Danya: Yes, we are hardcore stans. Also, I watched so many K-dramas. They’re still some of my favorite shows, K-dramas.

John: Awesome. One of the other challenges in Kpop Demon Hunters is that you have a trio of heroes and each of them have their own storylines and things they need to service. I did Charlie’s Angels, and they share a lot of kinship between the two of them. It’s a really challenging thing to do because every scene has to support multiple things. It has to support individual character stuff of one of the three, their group dynamic, and move the plot forward, and you have to have surprises and reveals. It’s a challenging structural movie. At the time that you were coming into it, it was just a Sony theatrical movie or had already sold to Netflix? Did you know where it was headed?

Danya: No. All we knew was, yes, Sony theatrical. That’s what our contract said.

John: Was your contract for a number of weeks, a number of drafts? What did your contract look like?

Danya: Everyone else on the project was paid weekly. Ours was for a treatment, a script, a rewrite, a polish, like a standard live-action movie. Very different how you do animated movies and live-action, which we didn’t know at the time.

John: I’ll say that, actually, I haven’t done a lot of animated movies, I generally am contracted on drafts and revisions, but it’s absolutely true that most of those people are on there weekly because it’s just this long, ongoing process. The challenge of you guys being on a draft basis is that those drafts can stand out for a very long time and they cannot pay you as frequently as they should pay you. How long were you working on KPop Demon Hunters? How many months, years was it?

Hannah: We were on it for the first two years, and then we were off it the third year when it sold to Netflix. I think Netflix wanted new writers to come in and take a look. Then we were off it for a year, and then they brought us back the fourth year. Then we were off it again the last year, the fifth year. I guess it was a total of two and a half, three years.

John: Isn’t it so strange when you leave a movie, I’ve done this a lot, you leave a movie, you come back and you’re like, “Oh my God, it’s grown a lot, but it’s also grown in weird ways,” things you don’t expect and decisions are made like, “Okay, well, that is what we’re doing now.” It must be exciting to actually see illustrations and probably temp reels and you got to see pencils and probably tests for a lot of things, and yet it’s almost a movie, but it’s not quite a movie. It’s a weird state when you come into movies that way.

Hannah: We loved seeing the animatics, the character designs, the set designs because you just don’t get to see that in live action.

Danya: Working with the storyboard artists and seeing what they bring to each scene, you’re like, “God, you’re so funny and smart. That’s exactly what it should be.”

John: Yes. During the two years you were originally on KPop Dream Hunters, then you were off and so on, what other work were you doing? I assume you were going out for a bunch of meetings. What was that life like? It doesn’t stop while you’re employed. Tell me about that.

Danya: It was the pandemic, so we had a lot of time. Didn’t have to do anything social. We were working on the KPop movie. We were still in our Disney Channel room. Then we were also working on the Diner script because Amazon and Macro optioned it. We were doing that with them. Three projects at once for the first two years

Hannah: Yes, which was really challenging, but because it was the pandemic, we were able to juggle it all. Eventually, the show ended and the Amazon project ended, so then we were just KPop. That was extremely time-consuming, so that took up all of our time towards the end. Then we got on another TV show. We did a Ren & Stimpy reboot, writer’s room.

Danya: We did a Paramount Plus script that never went anywhere, but they did pay us.

Hannah: We did a Lord Farquaad origin story for Dreamworks. Just a treatment, though. Never made it to script.

Danya: Oh, we did a Cheech & Chong biopic that also did not go anywhere. So many things die.

Hannah: Everything dies.

Danya: Everything dies.

John: Through all this other work, because KPop Dream Hunters was not a Writers Guild-covered movie, are you guys WGA yet? What got you into the guild?

Danya: The Disney Channel room got us into the guild originally, but we have been in and out of the guild so many times because we did not make the requirements.

Hannah: Yes, because we kept going to animation.

John: That’s really one of the giant challenges. As you’re dividing your work between two different places, you don’t earn enough in either space to give them health insurance.

Hannah: Yes. Well, the most recent show we did, luckily, has us in the WGA for a while. It’s the Matthew/Woody show that we were co-producers on. So many random things in between that paid the bills but never actually went anywhere.

John: That’s a screenwriter’s life. That’s the reality. Most of the things you do are not going to get produced, but if they’re putting money in the bank account and keeping a roof over your head, those are the jobs you take. Hopefully, they’re building towards other things down the road. If that project doesn’t get made, at least you’ve got something out of the experience or the connections or something else that’ll help you out for the next thing past that. Drew, we have some follow-up from previous episodes. Let’s start with, back in 7/11, we were talking about breaking in. We have two guests here who have more recently broken in. Let’s see what the instinct is here.

Drew: An aspiring adult woman writes, “Sam’s question about how to break into the industry at 34 really hit home for me. I appreciated the brutal honesty of Alina and John’s response, but damn, it also sucks. I’m also 34, living Sam’s goal, working as an assistant at a production company, and I feel stuck in a different way.

I’m so close to everything yet still so far. I’m utilizing every connection I have and will continue to forever, but I’m frustrated by the people long past retirement age not passing the torch. Of course, the industry is changing and there is uncertainty in the air, but I believe so much of the problem is that the 65-plus crowd is not stepping aside and letting a new generation be the adults in the room. We just have to keep writing. Keep writing, Sam.”

John: All right, so much to unpack there. I want to start with the last point about people stepping aside. I’m not sure that it’s writers in their 60s who are the problem, but it may be decision makers in their 60s who are not hiring new people may be one of the factors that’s, I think, really at play here. It’s great having two of you in front of me because you’re both in your early 20s, and this is a writer who’s 34 and is experiencing a different thing.

You had the ability just to sort of get out of college and go right into it, which is what I was able to do, too. I know there’s such an advantage to being in your ramen days where life is cheap and you don’t actually have big expectations of things. It’s nice to just be young and hungry and write the script in a weekend because you need to get that done. You must have classmates who are starting to be frustrated by the inability to sort of get headway here. What are those conversations like and what do you find people doing?

Hannah: Close to home question. I think our advice always to everyone is find a way to do this that’s not paid because, obviously, you have to do other things to make money. You have to work a restaurant job or work an assistant job or freelance stuff, and you need to be doing those things so that you can survive. I also think if you only do that, then some people can just completely– they’re not even doing the thing that they love to do anymore because they don’t have any time to do it or they have no energy to do it.

I feel like it’s so important to be like you just have to keep doing the thing that you love and the thing that you want to do, even if it’s an improv show or a short film that you wrote and you funded yourself and you shot on an iPhone. We know people that are doing that and are making their own content for really cheap. That’s incredible. You have to keep doing that.

Danya: Hopefully people that you know that you’re friends with are, I don’t know, farther along in their careers that can watch one of your short films and be like, “Wait, that was really good. I want to send this to someone.”

Hannah: We’re also constantly sending our friends to our manager. We use our manager as our personal, “You have to help our friends get reps.” We threaten him. We’re like, “Send these people out, find someone at your company.” He’s doing the work of multiple managers because we’re like, “Now you need to go find other managers to rep our friends.”

Danya: I feel like we’ve said this to a few people, but having a writing partner, even if it’s not permanent, is so helpful because it’s someone holding you accountable. It’s like when you sign up for a workout class, you’re like, “Oh, it’s early, I’m cold, I don’t really want to go.” If Hannah’s at the workout class and I’m like, “She’s waiting for me, I got to show up, I have to go.” It’s just so much easier to do anything. I don’t know if it works for everyone, but it certainly helped us write even when we really don’t want to.

John: Going back to this question here, she’s saying that she’s working as an assistant at a production company and she feels stuck. One of the challenges is that being an assistant there, you have some access, you have some, but you’re also probably completely exhausted and your days are spent doing all this other stuff and you probably don’t come back home with a lot left in the tank to be doing other writing. As your substitute teaching jobs, they weren’t the ideal jobs, but you were saying you got done at 3:30 in the afternoon and you actually had some more time left, and you didn’t spend your whole day writing. You spent your day doing other things.

My summer that I spent between my two years at Stark working at Universal, I was just filing papers. It was completely mindless. When I came home, I had not used my brain at all and I could write at night and it was actually still possible. I would encourage this writer to look at what is the setup that she’s in right now and is it allowing her to get writing done. So often I think underneath of this is that people start to resent writing because their career isn’t happening, and really what they are sort of should be resenting is that circumstances of their life is not permitting them to spend all their time writing, and that’s reality. We have another question here from Beth.

Drew: Beth says, “I love hearing you guys talk about ways to break the inertia and moving from the thinking about writing into writing. I find it helpful and sometimes it just gives me the confidence to put pen to paper, but the one layer to this problem I don’t really hear anyone anywhere talk about is trying to overcome this obstacle when you also have ADHD. I wanted to write in and see if you come across any writers who’ve had to change their process to overcome obstacles such as this where conventional writing tips just don’t work or maybe work 50% of the time.”

John: I saw you guys exchange a look. Does that resonate with you at all?

Danya: I have that. I have ADHD. I love to word vomit on paper and then edit later because I think if you just put anything out there, even if it’s so disorganized, so bad, it feels so much better to go back and edit that than slowly write something that’s perfect. I would not get anything done if I wrote that way, and Hannah’s the opposite. Hannah has to write everything perfectly immediately. I also will do a plug. Not that this is my device, but Brick, if you are distracted by your phone, is really nice.

John: Brick is the little gizmo which you tap your phone on and it basically locks down your phone so you can’t be pulled away by it.

Danya: Yes, exactly. That’s been really helpful. I mean, not that anyone needs to be on medication, but I am on medication and it is helpful. Mostly, yes, just vomit draft. That’s the first thing that I try to do. You really have to psych yourself into it. It’s like jumping into a pool. You just have to do it. Once you start, it’s easier to keep going, and me and Hannah will do this and I know it’s not healthy to do, but we won’t pee. It’s something that is like a reward to us because any distraction is actually huge if you have ADHD.

Hannah: We won’t eat. We’ll be like, “We have to finish this and then we’re allowed to eat.”

Danya: Which that one’s really bad. Peeing is a middle ground.

Hannah: I will say also, I think having a writing partner with OCD helps as well because if it’s ever too getting off in all these random places, my brain is very much one track tunnel vision. I typically will pull back to the immediate task at hand.

Danya: Also, if you’re stuck on one thing because of the OCD person, it’s good to have someone be like, “We got to move on or else I’m going to have a freakout.”

Hannah: We keep just suggesting writing teams. It’s great.

John: Maybe a good solution for a lot of people is that both the coach, the accountability, we’re in this together, just having a buddy will help you there. Listen, ADHD is a real thing and there’s medications for it. There’s other ways to address it. I want to make sure that people aren’t using it as a wave away excuse. Writing is also just really hard. It’s uncomfortable to start writing. It is for everybody, no matter how your brain is set up. It’s just not a pleasant thing to get started doing.

I think Beth needs to take some time and try some different ways to see what is actually productive for you, what tends to work. Whether it’s done as intent to do a vomit draft, great, or as more focused, like, “I’m going to get this right the first time,” whatever it is that is actually getting words on the page for you is a solution that’s good as long as it’s overall healthy and you’re not doing other dangerous things to yourself. Give yourself some grace to understand that it’s going to be a process, a journey. Not every day is going to be fantastic, but you’ve got to– writers write. You need to find some way to actually get those words down on the page.

Danya: There’s also one other thing that just reminded me. Sometimes what we’ll do is we’ll send voice notes to each other and then you can just copy that and paste it. Even though it’s so bad and not accurate, that’s also so helpful to just have actual words on a page and then you can edit it later.

John: Yes. I’ll do the same thing. There’s a dictation program I like called Aqua Voice. It’s really good for if I’m going into a pitch and there’s things I need to talk through, I would just hit the button and just word vomit all the things I need to say in it. Then on the call, I actually have that to refer back to because it’s a practice for it and I can see the text that’s there. That’s nothing I’m going to send to somebody, but it’s just for your own purposes and it’s getting it out of your head and onto something that you can edit again or touch again if you need to. Let’s take a question from Hunter. He’s asking about taking a semester in LA.

Drew: I’m a writer and law student in Baltimore. I’ve written a few scripts and I’ve made a few connections in the business, but I recognize that I’m at the very beginning of my career and there’s a long way to go. I have an opportunity to take some law school classes at UCLA as a visiting student, which would mean spending a semester in LA. I have family I can stay with there. I can work my current job remotely, attend classes, spend the rest of my time trying to write and network. Do you guys think this is worth my time?

Danya: Absolutely.

John: Some enthusiastic nods on this side.

Danya: For sure. That sounds like you have to. It would be weird if you didn’t.

Hannah: Yes. It would be weird if you didn’t. I think being in LA is so important. A lot of things have become virtual now, and it’s a lot easier to live other places and try to make it in the industry now. It still feels like such a place where you’ll go to a coffee shop or a bar and you’ll run into someone that works in the industry and you’ll become friends with them and it’ll just be a very natural type of networking that isn’t so official and business-like if you’re living here and you’re going out with the people and you’re hanging out with the people that work here.

Danya: Yes. Also, the friends that you’re going to make in that class are going to be so helpful to you even if you don’t think so in the moment. We have gotten so many things just from friendships, whether that’s from college or just the bars, coffee shops, people you’re talking to, and also, I’ll say this, Generals. If you can go on Generals while you’re here in LA, going in person is so much better than virtual because you’re just creating a real relationship with someone versus something through a screen. It’s just not the same at all, and it’s fun to go in person. You’re getting a sense of the city, the entertainment industry.

John: We’ve been doing the podcast for 14 years now, and I would say, over the course of the 14 years, it’s never been less important to live in Los Angeles, but it still actually is really helpful. Just in terms of getting a sense of what this is like and, Hunter, you’re also getting the sense of would you even want to live in LA? You might have this fantasy of what LA is going to be like, but then you get here and it’s like, “Oh, it’s actually not what I was hoping for. It’s not a thing that I want to do.” Yes, I think you owe it to yourself to come out here and try, and a summer semester feels great.

Cool. All right, now it is time for our One Cool Things where we recommend stuff that we want our listeners to know about. I’m going to just do two quick ones here. First is Pluribus, the new series by Vince Gilligan. It’s just delightful. It’s so weird and so specific and wonderful. I’m not surprised it comes from Vince Gilligan’s brain. I’m three episodes in as we’re recording this. It’s really strange, but not– we just talked about whatever happened to weird. It’s not weird for the sake of being weird. It’s just really good and unusual and specific. Check out Pluribus. It’s on Apple TV.

Second thing is just a comfort food watching for me, which is Claire Saffitz. Claire Saffitz is a chef baker who used to be on Bon Appetit, their video channel, but now she does her own stuff at her house. The video I’ll put a link in the show notes too is she makes dirt bombs, which are basically donut holes, but done in a muffin tin. She’s just such a good baker and she has such a good quality, a joy to her cooking. Check it out. They’re approachable recipes.

The other thing she does is she does this thing where she recreates KitKat bars or something like that. She has to figure out how to make something that very closely approximates junk foods. They’re remarkably difficult. I love that she will research carefully and shows the hard work that goes into experimentation, even in the kitchen.

Drew: Oh, I love watching this.

Danya: I loved her.

John: Yes, she’s the best. Two One Cool Things, Pluribus and Claire Saffitz, basically any video that she does. What do you have for us for one cool thing?

Hannah: I have two things as well. The first one, I’m going to sound like such a kiss-ass, but–

Danya: It’s real though.

Hannah: It’s real. I recently watched Chernobyl.

John: Oh, yes. That’s a good series.

Hannah: I have since become insanely obsessed with that whole situation. I’ve bought books on the meltdown. It’s a hyper fixation now because of that show. That’s one. I’m sure everyone’s already seen it, but on the off chance, you haven’t seen it yet.

Danya: Yes, I’m three episodes in.

Hannah: If you’re like Danya and you’re wondering, I’m like, “Watch it. It’s incredible.” The second thing is–

John: It’s not that good. It’s fine. It’s whatever. I don’t know. There are things to it.

Hannah: Of course.

John: I’m struck by the fact that you watched Chernobyl and was like, “I need to know more.” I watched Chernobyl like, “I’m good. I’m full. I’m done.”

Danya: Thank you for saying that because I feel crazy. Hannah’s like, “How could you not want to buy 8,000 books and listen to podcasts and watch more?” I’m like, “Yes, I don’t–”

Hannah: There’s something about radiation that–

Danya: Really hits?

Hannah: It really hits for me. I’m absolutely fixated on it. I haven’t read the books yet, but I don’t know how they’ll live up to the show.

John: Why bother reading a book when there’s already a series made of it? You’re not going to be able to do anything with it.

Hannah: You’re right.

John: That’s why, honestly, that’s one of my worst tendencies is if I’m reading a book and then I look up and someone already has the film rights, I’ll stop reading the book. Sometimes.

Hannah: No. Well, see, that’s genuine curiosity on my end because I’m like, “I’m not going to do anything with this. I just want to know more.”

John: Yes. She’s better than all of us. All right.

Hannah: The second thing is also everybody already knows about her, Chapell Roan, but a song that I love of hers from one of her super early albums from 2020 called Love Me Anyway. It’s an incredible song. I think everyone that loves Chapell should listen to it because it was her, yes, a song before she hit it big. It still hits.

John: That’s great. Chapell Roan is such a fascinating artist because she’s clearly a super mega talent and wasn’t quite recognized for how good she was and the album tanked and then she sort of redid her vibe and became the phenomenon that she is. She’s still the same person, and the difference between Chapell Roan as the icon artist and her trying to maintain a private identity that’s separate from that. It’s all fascinating and interesting. It’s just hard to be an artist these days. Danya, what you got for us?

Danya: Okay. I have two things. I changed one of them. Being crazy. I’ll do this one first. While we were in Texas, our EPs, Rhett Bair and Dave Finkel, got us really, and by us, I mean mostly me, really into Buster Keaton. I got really obsessed with the teens of Hollywood. I was in the 19-something.
John: Very early days of film. Yes.

Danya: Exactly. There’s this book that I read that was recommended to me by them. It’s called The Parade’s Gone by Kevin Brownlow. It is such a great book. It’s around 600 pages. It does take a minute to get through. If you are at all interested in the origins of Hollywood as the entertainment industry or just Hollywood and LA history. It is so interesting and seeing who created what jokes, what stunts. Even like Mary Pickford, we went to Musso & Frank last night and we tried her Alfredo pasta. I’ve been dying to try it.

John: How was it?

Danya: It was actually delicious.

John: That’s great, because so often the legendary things are actually not that good in person.

Danya: No, this was exactly what it should have been. Yes, really recommend this book if you care about history.

John: Hunter, when Hunter comes to visit LA, if it’s necessary, should go to Musso & Frank’s because it’s an iconic place.

Danya: Yes, absolutely. The pasta is around $24.

Hannah: Split it with someone.

Danya: Split it with someone. Then the other book that I’ll recommend is called Manhunt. It’s by Gretchen Felker-Martin. It follows the aftermath of a plague that turns people with high testosterone into feral beasts. The story follows two trans women as they hunt these creatures for their, I’m sorry to be crude, balls. They’re men’s balls because that’s where they can get estrogen to prevent them from turning into these creatures themselves because they’re trans women.

There’s also TERFs that are trying to kill them. I don’t know if anyone knows what TERFs are, but they don’t believe in trans people. It’s so graphic, but so incredible. It obviously explores transphobia and survival, community, gender. It is so, so good. One of the best books I’ve read in a long time.

John: That’s great. Cool. I like that you both had two. Sometimes we were lacking for One Cool Things, and now we got six One Cool Things in one episode, which is nice. All right, and that is our show for this week. Scriptnotes is produced by Drew Marquardt, edited by Matthew Chilelli. Our outro is by James Llonch. If you want an outro, you can send us a link to ask@johnaugust.com. That is also the place where you can send questions like the ones we answered today. You’ll find transcripts at johnaugust.com, along with a sign up for our weekly newsletter called Interesting, which has lots of links to things about writing.

You’ll find clips and other helpful video on our YouTube. Just search for Scriptnotes and give us a follow. You’ll also find us on Instagram @ScriptnotesPodcast. We have T-shirts and hoodies and drinkwear. You’ll find us at Cotton Bureau. Most importantly, we have the Scriptnotes book, which you can find at bookstores everywhere. Those are your copies. Those are galley copies. Those are for you to take home. They have typos galore, but the real hard covers don’t have the typos in them.
You will find the show notes with the links to all the things we talked about today in the email you get each week as a premium subscriber. Thank you to all our premium subscribers. You make it possible for us to do this each and every week. You can sign up to become one at scriptnotes.net. We get all the back episodes and bonus segments, like the one we’re about to record on what movies get wrong about Gen Z. Hannah, Danya, thank you so much for being on ScriptNotes. Congratulations on KPop Demon Hunters and your career.

Danya: Thank you.

Hannah: Thank you so much.

[Bonus Segment]

John: All right. The two of you get hired on for KPop Demon Hunters and other projects because you know how young people speak because you are young people yourselves. You must see a lot of movies and TV shows and feel like, “Oh, that does not feel authentic to me.” What are some things you’re noticing that are the things that drive you crazy about how you see your generation portrayed on screens?

Hannah: The first thing off the top of my head is when you see lingo being used because obviously this thing has normally been written two years ago by the time it makes it to screen. I feel like Gen Z lingo changes every six months, like what is cool to say, what’s not cool to say. My little brother, he is always telling me that’s not cool anymore. I’m like, “Five months ago, you were saying it all the time. What do you mean it’s not cool anymore?”

I think that the way that stuff is filtered through so quickly now and lingo goes out of style immediately. Then you see it in a TV show two years from now, the thing that the kids were saying two weeks ago, or sorry, you know what I mean. I really think older writers and all writers in general, even us, should not be using the cool lingo of the moment because we’ve seen so many shows where they’re like, “That’s fire,” and, “That’s lit.” That is from truly three, four years ago. You cannot be putting stuff. It has to feel timeless, honestly.

Danya: It’s so interesting because I’m rewatching Dawson’s Creek. I watch a lot of the ’90s, 2000s, I guess, YA shows. They do the exact opposite. They have all of these kids speak as if they are philosophy majors in college. It’s just so interesting. I’m like, “What happened?”

John: That’s a Kevin Williamson thing. It was new as he was doing it.

Danya: I almost feel like that’s better because you’re not talking down to these people that you’re trying to get to watch your show. It’s almost like, I don’t know, I feel like the shows that we watch where they’re using this lingo, I’m like, “Are you making fun of them? That’s what it looks like because you’re doing it in such an inaccurate way that it comes off like that.

I also think what happens a lot is that you’re trying too hard to create content for them and you’re trying to guess what they would want versus these kids who are now watching Dawson’s Creek. They’re rewatching these classics that are not meant for them really because they just want authentic stories that are just interesting. I think trying to create something for a specific demographic is just really hard, and I would avoid that.

Hannah: Yes. I think the biggest thing is not making fun of any certain demographic because I feel like you can really tell when Gen Z is written and they’re made out to be these really flippant, dumb– I feel like it’s hard for older people to write Gen Z without being a little condescending. The only times that I feel like it works well is when they’re actually being really nice to them in terms of how they’re portrayed. I’m trying to think of shows that have done that. It’s not common. It’s normally not common to see them portrayed in a good light.

Danya: Yes. I know what you’re talking about.

John: Clueless is one of my favorite movies. I think one of the bad lessons you can learn from Clueless is that all teenagers speak with this very heightened, incredibly both erudite but overwhelmed with specific in-group lingo. It works so well in Clueless because it’s just masterfully done, but to try to do that in other things, it’s going to fall apart. It’s just not how actual human beings speak in a normal way. Either trying to, you’re saying, use lingo vernacular that’s going to be dated incredibly quickly, disaster, or try to create this fever bubble of how people speak. In most situations, this is not going to work.

Hannah: Oh, that made me think. The one that I’ve seen do so well, even though they were using lingo and stuff, is Eighth Grade.

John: Oh, yes. For sure.

Hannah: So good. I don’t know how he did that. I guess it was a bit of a period piece. He was saying, “This was the lingo of this time period. It’s not current anymore,” which I think if you’re going to do it, that’s how you have to do it. You have to do it like 10 15, where it’s like, this is what it was like during this time period, but it’s not current anymore.

Danya: I feel like comedians do a good job of that because of the style now, which is so observational in a really intense way, more so than ever, that I’m like, unless you are paying that much attention and absorbing how they speak, then you can’t really comment on it because it is so niche. It’s really hard to get right.

John: I would also say I get frustrated by broad stereotypes of, “Oh, a Gen Z person is like this,” in terms of how they address authority figures, what they do. It’s true that there are some generational differences in terms of how groups interact with each other, and there’s weird conflicts between millennials and Gen Zs and all those kinds of things, but every character is a specific individual character. That logic behind why they’re doing things should make sense, no matter where they started.

Gen Z is the first generation who grew up not just with the internet, but also with phones, constantly being able to access things. I think I’ve noticed is that sometimes older writers will have the wrong assumptions about how often kids will reach out to their parents or reach out to other people. The sort of constant communication, I have a daughter who’s 20, and that sense of always being on and being connected with people. That is a different thing than a previous generation. That sense of you could be independent but still always be in contact with your tribe is such a different experience.

Danya: Yes, completely agree with that.

Hannah: Yes. I think that’s another thing is that a lot of Gen Z, honestly, aren’t on their phones as much as I think is portrayed in media. There’s so many different ages of Gen Z, too. It’s like you can’t group all of Gen Z into one type of person because there’s the Zillennials and there’s the baby, baby Gen Zs. I feel like the phone thing is such a common trope. I also feel like some Gen Zs are going against the phone and wanting to go back to flip phones and iPods and cameras. What are they? The point-and-shoot digital cameras. Yes, I feel like it’s always going in a circle.

John: Think about the dialogue you’ve written for your movies. When you’ve come in to do a pass on younger characters, what are some things you’re seeing in those dialogue blocks? You’re like, “Oh, let’s actually turn that back.” Are you doing anything different about how characters are talking over each other, how they’re interrupting, the politeness and permission they’re giving each other? Is there any general patterns you’re noticing that after you’ve done your pass on things, it reads a little differently because of choices?

Danya: I feel like we haven’t done a pass in a while.

John: To your Diner script. Your Diner script is raunchy young women. Is there anything about that script that you think is specific to this generation where if it was made 10 years before this or 20 years ago, it would read a lot different?

Hannah: I think one of the biggest things is we really don’t like trauma porn. I think that that might be an older thing, maybe, if I’m trying to find a pattern. I think that something that maybe is Gen Z or younger is that a lot of the stuff that we write, our people are in really serious, intense situations, but they have some levity around it. They’re making jokes around it or they’re very self-aware of themselves and the situation and are trying to be optimistic even if it is a really rough situation that previous writers maybe would have shown in a very dark, depressing light.

Danya: Yes, I think that’s true.

John: I think, and this is a cliche but also has an element of truth to it, is that Gen Z individuals, they’re aware of themselves as a brand or at least how they’re putting themselves out in the world. They have a concern about reputation and presentation that is specific to the area in which they grew up in.

The curation, again, I don’t want to minimize everything that everyone’s on their phones, but the idea of curating your identity, being very measured about what you’re putting on the grid versus what you’re putting on stories, that’s probably something you can think about in terms of how the characters are responding as well, too, in terms of what they’re sharing at work versus what they’re sharing with their friends, that those tensions are always natural.

Hannah: Yes. Honestly, I don’t know if we’ve written something. A lot of the stuff that we write is almost in a different reality to where I’m trying to think of the times that we’ve actually had phones and social media in our scripts. It’s not actually that often.

Danya: It’s not. I think we try to be true to technology. It’s there. We use it.

John: I came up with 100. It exists and the phones are a thing, but you’re also finding reasons for why people are interacting face-to-face because it’s better for the movies.

Danya: Yes. I think we’ve used FaceTime before, kind of a cheat.

Hannah: Yes. Anything that can be as visual as possible. I feel like I’m trying to think of what– when we used to do those youth passes and we’d go in and you’d see what was written for the young characters, I feel like we would literally just take out anything that felt like it was lingo. Anything that was like–

Danya: Some jokes were old, if you could believe that. Jokes themselves were like, “Wait, what? This is like–“

John: Nicole Perlman has a term called the clam, which she may have told you about, which is basically a joke that just sits there as a joke. It doesn’t do anything. It’s just a clam.

Danya: There was also, I can’t remember if this was from one of our roundtables, but I think there was a misconception of physical comedy being dead. We’re like, “It is so alive. It’s crazy how alive it is.” I remember the men being shocked that we were like, “We need to add more of that.”

Hannah: That’s true. I think that might be actually a common misconception about Gen Z is that a lot of the comedy is dialogue-heavy, really talky-talky, quick, banter.

Danya: It’s like Gilmore Girls-esque, fast. You’re just like, “What’s happening? It’s too much.” I do think, perfect for Gilmore Girls, not for me.

Hannah: Yes, I think that we do like Naked Gun and dumb Talladega Nights and Hot Rod and all those movies that are really dumb, dumb comedy.

John: If you look at the comedy that’s coming out of Los Angeles, the clown tradition is a real big thing right now. Again, it’s a thing you need to be there in person to see that’s a special kind of quality that feels real and tactile, which is the opposite of sort fake digital stuff, which may be part of the reason why it’s doing so well. Thank you guys again. It was great talking with you.

Danya: Oh, thank you so much for having us.

Hannah: Thank you. We had so much fun.

John: Great.

Links:

  • Danya Jimenez and Hannah McMechan
  • KPop Demon Hunters on Netflix
  • No Strings Attached
  • The Black List x Women in Film Episodic Lab
  • Nicole Perlman on Scriptnotes, episodes 164, 222, 373, 381
  • Brick
  • Pluribus on Apple TV
  • Claire Saffitz makes Dirt Bombs
  • The Parade’s Gone By by Kevin Brownlow
  • Manhunt by Gretchen Felker-Martin
  • Chernobyl on HBO Max
  • Chappell Roan – Love Me Anyway
  • Preorder the Scriptnotes Book!
  • Get a Scriptnotes T-shirt!
  • Check out the Inneresting Newsletter
  • Become a Scriptnotes Premium member, or gift a subscription (now with fewer emails!)
  • Subscribe to Scriptnotes on YouTube
  • Scriptnotes on Instagram
  • John August on Bluesky and Instagram
  • Outro by James Llonch (send us yours!)
  • Scriptnotes is produced by Drew Marquardt and edited by Matthew Chilelli.

Email us at ask@johnaugust.com

You can download the episode here.

Scriptnotes, Episode 712: Something Wicked This Way Comes, Transcript

November 18, 2025 Scriptnotes Transcript

The original post for this episode can be found here.

John August: Hey, this is John. Standard warning for people who are in the car with their kids: there’s some swearing in this episode.

[music]

John: Hello, and welcome. My name is John August.

Craig Mazin: My name is Craig Mazin.

John: You’re listening to Episode 712 of Scriptnotes. It’s a podcast about screenwriting and things that are interesting to screenwriters. Today on the show, we welcome back one of our favorite guests and guest hosts.

Craig: Yes.

John: Dana Fox is a writer and showrunner whose credits include, taking a breath here, What Happens in Vegas, Couples Retreat, Ben and Kate, How to Be Single, Cruella, Home Before Dark, The Lost City, Wicked, and the upcoming Wicked: For Good. She’s also my former assistant and one of my very favorite people. Welcome back, Dana Fox.

Craig: Ta-da.

Dana Fox: John and Craig are my favorite people. I have to say it right away. Get it out of my system.

John: We’re recording this in our office on a very rainy day. Behind you is the couch, which you would often take naps on.

Dana: I assume you were going to have it bronzed, but it’s just the same couch. It’s still here.

John: The same couch. Lambert is now taking a nap on your couch.

Dana: I saw it, and I had a Pavlovian response to it. The second I saw it, I thought I was going to fall asleep on it.

Craig: The gravity just takes you in, and you just want to lie down and not work.

Dana: Hold me towards it and made me disappoint John because I wasn’t awake to answer his phone.

Craig: Look at you now.

Dana: It’s because he let me nap that I think I did so well in the business.

Craig: [laughs] Okay. Well, something has to explain it.

Dana: I just needed to sleep a little bit. I was so tired. I needed to prep.

John: Look at you now with those headphones on. As Craig said, you do look like Princess Leia.

Dana: Thanks, guys.

Craig: Exactly like Obi-Wan, you’re our only hope, Princess Leia, because you’re wearing a Princess Leia–

Dana: She was a real hero of mine, so thank you for that. I really wanted to be her.

John: Carrie Fisher, of course. Incredible.

Dana: Oh my God, she’s incredible, and the most amazing writer.

John: Did you ever meet her?

Dana: No, I never did. I would have lost my mind.

John: I went to a birthday party for a friend that was at her house. She was exactly as cool and weird as you would want her to be.

Dana: A dream.

John: A dream. An absolute dream.

Craig: Nice.

John: Today, with you on the show, I do want to talk about Wicked, obviously. I also want to talk about character suffering, whether the ’90s were really a great movie decade, or whether this is all just our nostalgia. We’ll get into that.

Dana: Amazing. Am I the character who’s suffering or characters that I write?

John: You will be. There’s a listener question about character suffering.

Dana: Oh, okay. I thought you were talking about me. I was like, “I’m now suffering.”

John: Well, we’ll get into suffering because in our bonus segment, I want to talk about the promo circuit because you’re on the promo circuit right now, and Craig’s been through the promo circuit. It’s just exhausting.

Dana: It’s intense. I’m really tired.

John: It’s a mark of success that you have to do the promo circuit, but it’s just it’s a lot.

Dana: Yes, and you became a writer because you enjoy pajamas and glasses and never doing your hair, and then you’re on–

John: Not being looked at, basically.

Dana: Never having a single person look at your face.

Craig: Yes. That’s my favorite thing in the world.

Dana: Craig, that is the best thing in the entire world. Then you’re on the promo circuit and all the wrong things are happening. People are looking directly at your face.

John: Sitting next to you is the Scriptnotes book, the Hardcovers, which just came in. We’re so excited to hold them. Craig, have you gotten yours up in Canada yet?

Craig: I have not received it in Canada yet. I don’t even know if you guys have my address in Canada.

Dana: You guys, it’s so beautiful. I can’t wait to read it. It’s so gorgeous. Just to say, if I may, John and Craig are the people that I call whenever I don’t know how to do anything. I’m always like, “Hey, guys, I’m sorry.” Let’s say I started with a voiceover, and then I have to do a fade-in. “Where does fade in go on the page?” Nobody knows. It all looks weird.”

John: Basically, non-creative questions then.

Dana: No, that’s not true. I call you guys with every question I have. Now I just have the book, so there’s no excuse that I’m not allowed to call you anymore. I have to look at the book.

Craig: It’s true. Dana sometimes calls. She’s like, “But is 1 also a prime number?” It doesn’t even have to be about screenwriting. It’s about anything.

Dana: It doesn’t even have to be about screenwriting. Totally.

John: One of the goals with the Scriptnotes book, as you remember, is that we wanted a book that if you were to throw it across the room, you could hurt a person. I’ll say that the book has some sharp edges to it, which is nice, but it’s actually lighter than I’d expect. Isn’t it lighter in your hand?

Dana: It’s looking wild. It looks like a trompe-l’oeil. Is it a cake? You know that show?

Craig: Absolutely. It looks like it could be cake.

Dana: Is it cake?

John: It could be cake.

Dana: Yes, because you pick it up and it’s like, “Ooh, no problem,” but it looks substantial.

John: If you throw it in your backpack, it’s not weighing you down, but it is a substantial book. Also, it lies flat, which I didn’t know was going to happen, but actually it’s nice.

Craig: Oh.

John: You can actually open up it.

Dana: [gasps] You’re right. I’m doing it. Reader or listener, I’m doing it. This is great.

Craig: You called the podcast listeners readers.

Dana: I don’t know how to do this, you guys. I’m so bad at stuff. I called my phone the internet before to John. I said, I just kept pointing at it and going, “I have to internet it later.” He was like, “What is happening with you?”

Craig: Oh, Dana Fox.

Dana: I love you guys.

John: Thank you to everybody who sent in the pre-order receipts to Drew at askajohnaugust.com, because we love those and they’re a way for us to know how many people are actually buying the book. This past week, Drew, you sent all those folks a bonus chapter. How did that go?

Drew: Really well. People were really nice about it and sent glowing emails back, which felt nice to read.

Dana: I’m going to do a thing. Am I allowed to say this?

John: Please.

Dana: I’m going to do a thing on my ‘internet’, which is my phone, on Instagram. My handle is @inthehenhouse. I’m going to give away 20 copies. I’m going to send them to people.

Craig: What? Really?

Dana: To young people, students. If you’re a student, if you’re trying to be a writer, I want to send you one of these books because these men, Craig and John, are the greatest people of all time, that they’ve spent their time trying to help other writers be better. They believe ‘rising tides raises all boats’, and they’re generous with their time. I love them. I want to send 20 books to whoever needs one.

John: Fantastic.

Craig: I have never felt anything doing this podcast until this moment.

Dana: DM me on my internet.

Craig: I’m having feelings.

Dana: Are you having feelings, Craig?

Craig: I’m having feelings. That was beautiful. Thank you.

Dana: It’s the least I could do. I just think you guys are amazing.

Craig: That’s very sweet, and it’s very generous of you, unless you’re stealing the books. If you’re stealing the books, it’s not generous.

Dana: No. I’m buying the books and giving them away.

Craig: Oh, okay. That is generous.

John: The bonus chapter we sent out is on getting stuff written. It was a chapter that was originally going to be in the book, and the book was just 600 pages, so we had to make some beautiful cuts [unintelligible 00:05:46]. We cleaned it up, we’ve formatted it nicely, and we sent it to all the people who had pre-ordered the book and sent the receipts in.

Dana: It’s amazing.

John: We’re still going to send it out. If you pre-order it now, we will send it to you. Drew will send it to you today. If you want this bonus chapter, it turned out really well.

Dana: Great. I’ll take the bonus chapter. Can I get some bonus chapter later?

Craig: Absolutely.

John: She needs to get some stuff written. One of the questions we get frequently is, are Craig and I going to do the audiobook, or are we going to read the audiobook for the Scriptnotes book? The answer is hell no. We are not doing that. That is a job left to a professional.

Dana: Correct.

John: I’m so excited to introduce the professional who actually did read the Scriptnotes book.

Craig: Woohoo.

John: Graham Rowat is an actor, a narrator whose talents span Broadway stages, television screens, audiobook recordings. You’ve seen him on Broadway in Dear Evan Hansen, Sunset Boulevard, Mamma Mia!, Guys and Dolls, Beauty and the Beast. He’s also a friend and a longtime Scriptnotes listener. Graham Rowat, welcome officially to The Scriptnotes podcast.

Graham Rowat: Thank you for having me.

Dana: Listen to that deep voice, guys.

Craig: You can hear the Broadway right in there.

Dana: Listen to–

Graham: Thank you. Thank you for having me.

Craig: It’s so good.

Graham: [chuckles]

Craig: So good.

Dana: Get out of here. Your advice just got better. Everything you guys wrote in the book is better. Just look at that.

John: Come on, the gravitas of that?

Dana: Intense.

Craig: These shows that you’ve been in, just one great show after another. Congratulations. That’s amazing.

Dana: I know. Incredible.

Graham: I thought to myself, I know John gets to Broadway shows. How about the other guests on the pod today? Does anyone get to see Broadway that often?

Dana: Funny story.

Craig: Not as often as I’d like to. I live in Los Angeles, and now I live in Canada.

Graham: For sure.

Craig: I do see shows pretty frequently once they make their way to the Pantages or something like that, or I go to the bowl. I went for Jesus Christ Superstar, and I went for Into the Woods.

Craig: That’s great.

Graham: I love a show.

Dana: That’s great.

Graham: What can I say?

Dana: I love a show.

Graham: I love a show.

John: We mostly love that your voice is our book because when the topic of the audiobook came up and Graham graciously asked, “Hey, do you or Craig want to do it?” It was like, “Oh, it’ll be like four days in a recording studio.” You’re like, “Absolutely not.”

Dana: No.

John: I wanted somebody to do the book who knew the show, knew the voice of the show, had a sense of what this was like. I asked Graham who would do it, and they figured out how to make a deal for Graham to do it. Graham, I’m curious, what is it like to record this? Because the book is not Craig and I back and forth. It’s just, it’s a we voice behind it. What is your process? What is your instinct going into try to read this book?

Graham: Well, the first thing I did was I wanted to listen to every one of the episodes that featured the guests that are quoted in the chapters. It’s tricky because I want to find a neutral voice, but I hear you and Craig when I’m reading the book. There are distinct moments, too. There’s a chapter, the Die Hard chapter, where it is the two of you having a discussion.

Craig: Yes, it’s true.

Graham: The neutral voice is pretty much me. That’s always the easiest thing to work from and go back to. Then, when the two of you step out and actually are John and Craig, for example, there’s Craig’s whole chapter where he presents his approach to screenwriting, I tried to stay true to the Craig persona.

Here’s the thing: it’s a matter of very subtle changes because one of the very first things they teach you when you’re learning the old audiobook stuff is that anything too broad, that’s what the audience is going to be listening to, especially accents. They’re going to be sitting there thinking, “I don’t think that’s a very good accent.”

Dana: You decided not to do the Australian accent for Craig?

Graham: I didn’t. I gave him sort of the Maverick Ed McMahon energy.

Craig: Nice. Good.

Dana: Hot. Yes, sexy.

Craig: Not hot, no. McMahon, no.

Dana: Oh, I thought what the Ed McMahon energy was. I always thought it was really sexy.

Graham: No, young Ed McMahon. A real young, dashing Ed McMahon.
[laughter]

John: Graham, a question for you. We’re talking about the chapters that are interspersed with all the subject chapters are interview chapters. Greta Gerwig and Christopher Nolan, for example, we try to do a light edit on them so you can still feel their voice and how they speak. What was it like for you to figure out how to make them sound on that? They read differently on the page, so how was it actually articulating those?

Graham: Thankfully, and listening to the episodes and listening to the interviews allowed me to have an image in my head so that when I got to Greta’s chapter, I could make a very slight adjustment vocally. It’s more about the conversational tone that was a part of their interviews. If I can inject? A little bit of a more casual conversational tone in their chapters, I feel like that makes it more distinct. If I am doing a Greta, I have her in my head because I’d listen to her, so if I make a slight pitch adjustment and I just make it a little more casual, I feel like I’m doing her justice, and I’m making enough of a shift away from the neutral narrator.

Christopher Nolan was the tricky one because he’s the very first one up. I thought if he had been ninth or tenth in your list of guests and I’d reached him, I probably could have gotten away with a very subtle English accent. I think the listener would have been okay with that because they’d be like, “Well, he’s used up all the other textures. We can give him a break.” But because he was the first one up, I had a conversation with the producer when I recorded this; he was Chris [unintelligible 00:11:14] was patched in from Texas. I said, “Should we do it?” and we came down on the side of not doing an accent for Christopher Nolan.

Craig: I think that’s fair. I think it’s a smart idea, given the fact that it starts it off because some people who haven’t heard Christopher Nolan speak might think, “Oh, this entire thing is going to be read in an English accent.” Also, Christopher’s brother Jonah has no English accent.

Graham: It’s so fascinating how different they are.

Craig: I feel like the Nolan family, you’re allowed to do either English or American. You’re fine.

Graham: That’s a relief.

Craig: Yes, you’re good. They won’t be coming after you.

John: Well, Graham, we are so, so, so appreciative that you did the book. Thank you so much for reading it. For folks who want to hear Graham read it, it’s December 2nd, just like the main book is out. It’s available everywhere. It should be on Audible, but every place you can buy audiobooks will have it.

Dana: I have 42 Audible credits I need to spend. I’m going to use one of them on this.

John: This is the perfect thing. It’s also going to be fun for people who’ve listened to the whole show to hear our words and just a different person saying it, which is great.

Dana: Different way.

Craig: Love it.

Dana: That’s so great. I’m so excited. There’s no one I trust more for advice about screenplay writing than you guys. This is amazing that you’ve done this book.

Craig: Thank you, Dana. Whatever content we provided, plus Graham’s magically resonant voice, should be very effective. Everyone should write better after this. We don’t know what else to do, honestly.

John: Graham, thank you. Thank you so much.

Dana: Thank you. Nice to meet you.

Graham: It was my pleasure. Thank you so much.

Craig: Thank you, Graham.

Graham: Take care.

Dana: That’s a chill voice right there, man.

Craig: It’s a good voice.

Dana: My thing is I usually listen to voices like that to go to bed at night. I’m having an ‘all right, all right’ moment from just talking to him. I’m ready to snooze it up on that couch over there.

John: Do you listen to any of those sleepcasts where they just talk about nonsense that just goes on, it just melts away?

Dana: Yes, 100%. I like a little patter. I like a sleep timer, and then boom, I’m out.

John: We have some follow-up to get to. Drew, could you start us off with some follow-up?

Drew Marquardt: Martin writes, “I recently listened to John’s appearance on the Birbiglia podcast, and I was fascinated by his method of writing his screenplays in Las Vegas hotels. I wonder if John is aware that this technique of literary production was invented and/or perfected by one of the most successful writers of all time, Agatha Christie. I saw an image making the rounds last year, clearly a scan of an actual book, but I don’t know what book. The quote is attributed to an author named Christiana Brand, and here is the quote.

‘Agatha Christie once described to me her own particular method of getting down to work. She mulled over a book in her mind until it was ready. She said, ‘Well, we all do that.’ She would then repair to a very bad hotel. In a bad hotel, there was nothing to do but to write and plenty of time to do it in. The beds were so uncomfortable that you had no inclination to retire early or to get up late. The armchair’s so unyielding that you wasted not a minute in idle relaxation. The meals were so bad that there was no temptation to linger over them.
Any guests who would put up with such conditions must, of necessity, be so stupid that you couldn’t possibly make friends and spend precious moments in desultory chat. The book would be done in a matter of weeks, and you could pack up a few dull clothes, which were all you needed to bother to take with you and go off triumphantly home.'”

John: Dana Fox, this thing of me writing in hotel rooms, I think I did that while you were my assistant. Was I ever faxing you pages? Do you remember that?

Dana: 100%. A fax machine was involved at some point. I think, also, you did a thing involving trains at one point.

John: I took the train from LA to Seattle and wrote on the train, and then I faxed stuff back from the train. I’m not surprised that Agatha Christie has written this, except that this last April, I was in Aswan, Egypt, where she wrote Death on the Nile, and I was at the hotel where she wrote Death on the Nile. It was the Old Cataract Hotel. By the way, it is a luxury hotel.

Dana: Yes, she’s full of shit.

John: Maybe at this point, she was actually like-

Dana: The armchair was amazing. The desultory conversations occurred constantly.

John: We were able to tour the room where she wrote it. It’s like a three-room thing with a walk-in closet.

Dana: Fantastic.

John: Then a patio. So she’s kind of flying.

Dana: Yes. [chuckles] It’s kind of amazing.

John: That’s what I’m hearing.

Craig: Thank you for writing in about this. I’m not surprised that Agatha Christie has done this. Let’s move on to follow up on weirdness. Mike has a recommendation for a good, weird movie.

Drew: “You Want Weird? Friendship from Andrew DeYoung. My wife called it the worst movie she’s ever seen. I thought it was brilliant. We’re still married.”

John: I really liked Friendship, by the way. It should have been one of my One Cool Things. It’s a movie with Tim Robinson and Paul Rudd. It is just really, really strange in a way that I loved.

Dana: I remember seeing that and thinking, “I’m going to like that,” and then never seeing–

John: You’re going to watch it on the plane when you fly home?

Dana: That’s right. That’s a plane movie.

John: It’s a plane movie.

Dana: I like to cry on planes, too. Can I cry in that or not?

John: No. You will laugh and feel unnerved.

Craig: You can cry.

Dana: I like to cry, if possible.

Craig: At the end, if you feel like a good cry, just force it out. It’s funny.

Dana: Just force it out of you.

Craig: We were on a plane recently and–

Dana: Yes, we were on a plane recently.

Craig: I feel once we stopped talking to each other, we started to cry.

Dana: My daughter, who is 11, bought me a sweatshirt because she knows how much I like to sleep. I feel like this is the only thing I’ve talked about on this podcast is sleeping. She bought me this sweatshirt. It’s called ‘Comfrt’ but it’s missing a letter-

John: Of course, it has to be.

Dana: -because you couldn’t name it that.

Craig: ‘Comfrt’.

Dana: ‘Comfrt’. It’s so soft. Then you put the hoodie over your head, and you pull down an eye mask that’s inside the hoodie that clutches to your face. I was like, “Charlotte, this is crazy. I can’t wear this. It’s hot pink. I’m like an adult woman. This is crazy.” It’s got zippers all over for all sorts of things. It’s extraordinary.

John: Yes, life-change [unintelligible 00:16:50] [crosstalk]

Dana: Literally, there’s never been a better. It was absolutely life-changing. I’m asleep inside of it. I wake up, and I whip up my little eye things. I see Craig Mazin standing in front of me, going, “Dana Fox, what are you doing here on this plane?” We talked for so long on the plane. It was adorable. Everybody around us got involved in us. It was very cute.

Craig: You know what? You looked like a cute little Jawa.

Dana: Thank you.

Craig: Now you’re Princess Leia. Then you were a little Jawa.

Dana: I’m doing the whole series. I’m doing all of Star Wars.

Craig: If you want adorable, find Dana Fox in her slanket on a plane.

Dana: It’s pretty slankety. I tried to sell it to your wife. I was like, “I get kickbacks on every sale.”

Craig: I’m buying her one. I’m buying her a slanket.

Dana: It’s amazing. I was going to get it for you, but I learned about Craig that he doesn’t like sweatshirts that don’t have zippers. Good talk.

Craig: I need the pull-down. I can’t be trapped.

Dana: You need to get in and out of it that way. Are you the same way?

John: Yes. I really like a zip-up hoodie.

Dana: Are you claustrophobic at all?

John: Not especially. A sweater’s fine. I don’t like a pull-over sweatshirt.

Dana: Interesting. I don’t have many pullover sweatshirts either, unless they have an open neck, in which case I’m fine because I know I can escape.

Craig: That’s what you needed to know about screenwriting and things that are interesting to screenwriters.

John: Let’s just cut right to the heart of the matter. Let’s get right onto the craft and do some follow-up on cuck chairs.

Dana: What’s that?

Craig: Oh, cuck chairs.

John: In episode 710, we were discussing cuck chairs. I’m not even quite sure how we got to the–

Dana: That sounds like a swear word, like 100%.

John: Again, this is why we have a not safe for work warning on this episode. The cuck chair is the chair next to the bed for when the husband has another man sleeping with his wife, so he can watch a cuckolding.

Dana: It’s like an intentional cuckolding.

John: Yes. The cuckold sits in the cuck chair.

Dana: Oh, God.

John: You know the standard corner of the hotel room chair.

Dana: Yes, but the fact that it happens so much in this story that there’s a whole chair for it, as if so many intentional cuckolding situations where people are accepting the cuckolding is happening.

Craig: I got to say, this is a very popular thing.

Dana: Is it really? No, stop it.

Craig: No, no. The cuck chair itself, I don’t know if that’s particularly– This whole cuckolding thing, it’s massive.

Dana: I literally cannot think of anything I would like less than all of this. I have always wanted to be the kind of gal that gets invited into a three-way. I have had so many people invite whoever I’m with into the three-way in front of me without me. They’re like, I would love to take your boyfriend or husband into a three-way with me and mine. I’m like, “I’m standing right here.” I think they can tell I would be very annoying, and I would want to talk the whole time.

Craig: What? No.

Dana: Nothing sexy. I’d be like, “You guys, this seems complicated. I feel like we’re going to all have feelings later that we need to talk about.”

Craig: Actually, it feels to me like the cuck chair might be made for you because it’s not a three-way. You’re not involved.

John: No, so you’re just watching.

Craig: You’re just watching.

Dana: I’m the husband in the chair? Oh, okay.

Craig: Or the wife.

Dana: Well, then, all right. Maybe. Honestly, maybe.

John: You could [unintelligible 00:19:49] have enough.

Craig: You could spend your Audible things.

Dana: Can I put the little eye mask over my face while it’s happening so I don’t have to watch it?

Craig: If you’re not watching, is it really cuckolding?

Dana: I would like to hear it, honestly. Just not see it.

Craig: Oh, that’s fun.

Dana: I feel like that would be sexier.

John: I’m not sure if I mentioned it, as we first discussed in episode 710, but there is a great episode of Decoder Ring, which is specifically about the cuckold chair and cuckolding in general, which goes back to the history of where it came from in Elizabethan times to now, it’s where it all came from. We have some more specific follow-up, including previous guests who’ve done work in this area. Drew, help us out.

Drew: Yes, comedian Sarah Schafer is selling miniature cuck chairs. It’s not inflatable like we talked about, but I still feel like she beat us to the punch.

Dana: I love her. I’ve met her.

John: She makes miniature models, so she makes a miniature hotel cuck chair. We also talked about on episode 710–

Dana: How is this a thing, guys?

John: -that my other company needed to make an inflatable cuck chair. You just put it there when you need it, but when you don’t need it, you can just put it away.

Dana: You have a company that makes sex stuff?

John: No, not at all. I said we would never do that.

Dana: Oh, okay. I thought you said ‘my other company’ has to make it, like my already established sex chair company.

Craig: John has an entire sex toy company that he hasn’t mentioned.

Dana: I thought that’s what you were saying. It didn’t seem like that far of a stretch. I was like, “Oh, he does technology and sex chairs and stuff.”

Craig: It does seem like a stretch, Dana. It’s a stretch.

John: It’s a stretch. We do have Scriptnotes barware.

Dana: Okay, that’d be cool.

John: It turns out, on Amazon, we found two inflatable chairs that feel exactly right for this purpose. We’ll put the links in the show notes there. Craig, do you want to click through and see these? This is one inflatable chair. You see, it looks like a side chair at a hotel, but it has a logo on it.

Dana: You can carry it in the bag.

John: Absolutely.

Dana: Nobody has to know. Did I ever tell you about the time I checked into a hotel, the only time I’ve ever changed my room? Because I don’t think I’m good enough to get into a hotel room and change it, and say like, “This isn’t good enough for me. I need a better room.” I don’t believe I deserve that. One time, I checked into a room and I opened the minibar and there was a half-eaten sandwich and an open box of suppository laxatives.

Craig: No, you’ve got to move.

Dana: I was like, “I got to go.” I was like, “I love you. I can’t. I support whatever happened here. I’m open to it, but I got to go.”

Craig: Did you write the scene, though? That’s a great scene prompt. Half a sandwich, laxatives. What went wrong here?

Dana: I think you guys should make your listeners write it because I couldn’t figure out what had happened. It was like a murder scene.

Craig: Sandwich and laxatives at the same time?

Dana: To me, it was the sandwich that was so confusing. It was a half-sannie. Anyway, why are you eating if you’re sopped up?

Craig: Yes, that’s the one that’s really tripping me up. Well, I got to tell you, John, you found a great product here if you’re a cuckold. The only issue, as I can see, is that the recommended maximum weight capacity is 200 pounds. I got to figure a lot of cucks are going to be two-plus.

John: If you pop the cuck chair, that’s extra humiliating, right?

Dana: That might work for the person who wants to be in the cuck chair.

John: I think the second choice may actually be better because this is the inflatable beanless beanbag chair. Besides the bed, it’s pretty humiliating to be sitting in that. It’s loaded around.

Dana: Honestly, it looks pretty nice to me. I think it looks comfortable, no?

John: It’s also max weight 200.

Craig: Again, there’s a gap in the market.

John: Yes, for plus-size cuckolds.

Dana: Built-in possibility for humiliation seems actually in line with the cuckold chair, so it sort of feels like it works.

Craig: You know what? God bless everyone, by the way. If that’s what you’re into and everybody’s cool with it, who cares? I don’t care.

Dana: That’s how I feel. Do your thing, man. Get your sandwich in your cuck chair, and another thing, and you just eat half the sandwich.

John: 100%

Craig: You just have to recognize. I think it’s fair to acknowledge, we don’t king shame. Some kinks are innately amusing. That doesn’t mean we’re degrading you.

Dana: No, we’re happy for you that you found a thing that you like.

Craig: We’re not even laughing at you. It’s just the concept is funny. It just is. It’s funny.

John: Let’s bring it back to a more wholesome moment here. We have some follow-up here from Carrie.

Drew: Carrie says, “I wanted to thank John and Craig for being such calming voices. My dog absolutely hates riding in the car. She’ll often tremble the moment she gets in. However, I’ve found that if I have Scriptnotes on, she’s much less likely to be upset and instead settles for mild discomfort. The moment I get in the car with her, I turn on Scriptnotes, and if an episode ends while I’m driving, I’ll immediately rewind and keep listening. If I don’t, the moment it ends, she starts to huddle in the back seat. While I’d like to thank them for their invaluable writing advice, I also thank them for their pup whisperer skills.”

Dana: That’s really sweet.

Craig: Do you know, ‘settles for a mild discomfort’ is probably what the person with half a sandwich and the laxatives is thinking.
[laughter]

Dana: In the cuck chair.

Craig: Yes, in the cuck chair.

Dana: That’s actually amazing. Also, how sweet is that?

Craig: How sweet.

John: That’s really nice.

Dana: You guys, you have nice pup voices.

Craig: We have nice pup– Yes.

Dana: I believe this. You guys are really good dudes. Pups love you. Pups know you.

Craig: I’ll tell you, my dogs do not like driving around. Cookie does the same thing. She’s very trembly. Real me is talking, and that doesn’t seem to do anything at all. Maybe it’s John.

Dana: Not even podcast me. It’s just actual me.

Craig: Actual me does nothing.

Dana: Oh.

Craig: Oh.

John: All right. Enough banter before we get started. It’s the key topic here. Dana, congratulations on Wicked.

Dana: Thank you.

Craig: Woo.

John: Wicked 1 and now Wicked 2. This was a long journey.

Dana: Ooph. Yes.

John: Let’s briefly recap what the history of Wicked is. Obviously, there was once upon a time, The Wizard of Oz. It was a book. Then it was a movie. There was a book by Gregory Maguire called Wicked, which sold to Marc Platt, who wanted to do it as a Broadway show first. It is a Broadway show, correct?

Dana: No.

John: Tell me what I got wrong there.

Dana: I believe the idea was to make it into a movie without music.

Craig: Yes.

Dana: They started it as that. I’m pretty sure they maybe even had scripts. Then Marc left. He was running Universal at the time.

Craig: He was, yes.

Dana: He went to be a producer. He said, “The one project I want is Wicked.” He took Wicked. It was Stephen Schwartz that convinced him that Wicked needed music because, inherently, The Wizard of Oz was so musical. It was crazy to do this idea without music.

John: Yes, makes sense.

Dana: Thankfully, Stephen Schwartz convinced him to make it a Broadway musical first. Universal, weirdly, always owned it because they had originally bought it to make it into a movie. They owned part of the rights to the play. Then they made it as a musical first.

John: That’s right. The musical that Stephen Schwartz wrote the music for and Winnie Holzman did the stage play for was a massive hit. I remember seeing a pre– I was on Broadway but pre-opening with Kristin Chenoweth and-

Craig: Idina Menzel.

John: -Idina Menzel. It was great. You could tell this is going to become a thing. It did become a thing.

Dana: It almost felt redefining, I think, too, in terms of what Broadway was doing at the time. It felt almost part movie, part musical in the sense that it had a big hook.

John: Stephen Schwartz is a Broadway legend.

Dana: A genius. The greatest.

John: You’re talking about Pippin. To have somebody like Stephen Schwartz take something that could be a little bit more in the Disney commercial zone for what Broadway sometimes does, to just do this whole other weird thing that was very original in its own way. The whole thing about Wicked is, it’s not The Wizard of Oz, really at all. It’s such an original show and so weird. It’s a weird show with incredible music.

Dana: Oh, geniuses. A lot of them.

John: Talking story, the stage version makes huge changes from the book. The central concepts come through, but it feels really, really different in story and how stuff is structured. Correct?

Dana: Yes. I never read the book-

John: What?

Dana: -which turned out to be a bit of a mistake because I told my 12-year-old he could read it. Apparently, no way, no.

Craig: No. No.

Dana: Not a great idea. He was like, “Mom, some intense sex stuff happened in this book.” I was like, “Yes, I don’t know what it’s about, but I’ve heard it’s amazing.”

Craig: I don’t know about that.

Dana: The extraordinary Winnie Holzman and Stephen Schwartz got together and took the main idea from it, which they thought was so brilliant, which was like, “What if this story that you knew and you absolutely were positive you knew everything about it, what if the bad guy was not who you thought they were? What if the person that was good was maybe not actually as good as you thought they were? Let’s see what that story looks like.”

John: What if they were best friends?

Dana: What if they were best friends? Interestingly, actually, Winnie told me the other day, which I’d never heard before, originally, Glinda wasn’t actually that big of a part. It was in meeting Kristin Chenoweth and becoming obsessed with Kristin Chenoweth that they decided that it had to be a true two-hander, which I had never heard before. That was pretty interesting.

John: All these things that seem inevitable were not inevitable at the genesis of this.

Dana: Absolutely.

John: It’s that process of discovery. The stage show is a huge hit, tours the world, a bunch of different languages. We all know it and love it, but eventually we’re going to make it into a film. The decision to make it from one film to two films, I’d love for you guys to talk about that process.

Dana: I think Craig maybe was around when it was more choice, actually. He can maybe speak to that. When I got involved, I was brought in by John, too. It was already a fait accompli. It was already like, “We’re making this as two movies. We can’t question it, and we can’t go back. We have to just do it.” Craig, you knew more about that stage and development, right? Where they were deciding to make it two movies?

Craig: No, it was a condition that they wanted me to work on Wicked, and I said, “Okay, but it has to be two movies.”

Dana: See, that’s amazing because you’re a genius. You knew.

Craig: Well, I don’t know about that. I’m very familiar with the show, and I read the script as it existed. What I remember saying to Marc was, “Once she sings Defying Gravity, you have to go home. You can’t stay in the theater.”

Dana: By the way, when you’re at the play, sometimes people made mistakes and we’re like, “Bye, that was the most satisfying thing that ever happened. I’ll see you guys. We’re going to go to dinner now.”

Craig: Right. You can’t. You just can’t. Also, the second act of Wicked, totally, is quite different.

Dana: Correct.

Craig: There’s too much to shove into one movie.

Dana: The songs are so extraordinary because Stephen is such a crazy genius, that you try cutting one song–

Craig: No, you really can’t, and you shouldn’t.

Dana: You were like, “I miss that song. That song’s like a short song. I love it and I miss it.”

Craig: I said, I can outline, I can make two treatments for two different movies, and I can write a script from the beginning to the end of Defying Gravity, and that’s sort of how you, “Aah, boom,” and we’ll see you next time. Marc and the executives at Universal, separately, we’re like, “Not sure Marc will go for that.” Marc’s like, “I’m not sure the studio will go for that.” I basically was like, “Everybody, let’s just do it.” Then they all said yes, and that’s it. That was the last impactful thing I did on Wicked.

Dana: Well, it was very impactful, my friend, seriously, because it’s not an obvious choice. It felt so dangerous at the time.

Craig: It feels so obvious now.

Dana: Well, now it does. Everything feels obvious now, but at the time when we were living in it, it’s like they talk about World War II, and it’s like they didn’t know how it was going to end. Back then, they didn’t know. It might have not worked out. We sort of felt like, “Oh my God, this might not work out,” because, as Craig was saying, it was never the first movie. Whenever people saw the first movie, thank God they loved it; it was wonderful. Everyone kept saying, “Well, it was obviously the right choice to break it into two movies.” I was like, “That’s because you haven’t seen the second movie yet.” I was like, “Hold that thought until–”

John: Let’s talk about this because if the decision wasn’t to make one movie and see how it does, and then make the second movie, the decision was to make two movies at the same time, that was distinct movies that are joined.

Dana: Yes, which means you can’t screw anything up because the first movie has to be a success, because you’ve already shot the second movie.

John: Were they cross-bordered? Were you shooting scenes from two?

Dana: 100% cross-bordered, and this is the brilliance of John and the group that he had around him, all the HODs that were so extraordinary, and the brilliance of Cynthia and Ari, that they would shoot the end of movie one in the morning and shoot Wonderful from movie two in the afternoon. They’re in completely different costumes, totally different hair, different characters. They talk about how they had to use different perfumes depending on which movie they were in because they had to sense things to trigger who they were. They had different playlists for the two movies for themselves to listen to because throughout the day, they had to keep it straight. It wasn’t even just–

Craig: Because it was based on location, basically.

Dana: It was all locations, basically. We had 73 sets, and we were turning over sets constantly. These sets were enormous. Nathan Crowley, who’s our production designer, is a genius. He’s Christopher Nolan’s guy. He’s absolutely extraordinary. I’m obsessed with him. Everybody, go find an interview with Nathan Crowley. He’s the greatest guy ever and totally brilliant. His wife is also extraordinary. Obsessed.

John: You know that you’re making two movies, and we’ll get into this one in the bonus segment where we talk about– The promo circuit is like, last time you had to just talk about the first movie and not acknowledge the second movie.

Dana: This is why they were all sobbing in their interviews, and everyone’s like, “Why are these people crying so hard in their interviews?” It’s like, “Because we just finished For Good. We’re crying about For Good. We’re not crying about Popular. We’re crying about the second movie.”

John: Craig and I have not seen the second movie yet, and I’m excited to see it.

Dana: I’m so excited for you to see it.

John: One of the real challenges, as Craig was alluding to and that you were also mentioning, we remember what happens in Act 1. Act 2 races through a bunch of stuff. If you look at the Wikipedia summary of Act 2, it’s like, “Oh my God,” half a line is given to things, and so you have to make much bigger choices about storytelling.

Dana: That’s exactly right. That was the exciting challenge of it, that the second act of the play is 45 minutes long. This movie is 2 hours and 10 minutes or 14 minutes. We obviously created a lot of new material for the second movie. I always used to describe the feeling of the second act as its own movie. You walked in, you sat down with your popcorn, and you got hit with the two, three-act break, and then you went crazy from there. That’s what the feeling is of the second act, because that was appropriate for the play. Then you’re looking at, “Okay, this is a moviegoing experience. People are used to a one, two, three-act structure.”

John: You’ve got to ramp up.

Dana: You ramp up. You’re a little slow. You’re like, “Where are we now? Who are we? What are we doing?” That was the big fun of trying to figure out movie two is how do we remind people where we are? How do we get them used to how much has changed in the time lapse between the two movies? That was actually a big discussion, was how much time to have passed during the two movies. You’ll see when you see the movie. We landed on something I think is interesting.

Craig: 30 years later?

Dana: Well, no. You know what it was? What I realized with my brilliant friend, Lorene Scafaria, is that the experience of people watching the first movie was so intense for them that it actually impacted how we were all thinking about the second movie as we were working on finishing it, because it raised the bar so much. It was like the expectations got higher and higher every time people were like, “Oh my God, this movie is killing me. I saw it 42 times in theaters.” The press tour of the girls became part of the movie itself. That was their friendship in a weird way because they are friends and they’re so close. Watching them be in love with each other platonically and crying all the time about For Good, which nobody knew, created this intense feeling that we knew we had to have come through the second movie.

Part of the decision of how much time passed was, we were like, “Oh, it should be how much time passed for the audience.”

Craig: Exactly.

Dana: “It should be a year,” because the movies are coming out a year later. Then Winnie came up with some brilliant word for what a year was, which was like 12 clock-ticks of the–

Craig: Clock moons or something, yes. Yes, that’s it.

Dana: She made up some crazy word for this, but we all know it’s a year.

Craig: 12 monthly [unintelligible 00:35:13].

Dana: Yes. The moon passages of the– Yes.

John: Talk about the writing process on this because you’re writing both movies simultaneously, or did you like, “Okay, we’re going to finish the scripts for the first movie and then start the script on the second movie,” or was it all blurred together?

Dana: I was pulled in by John Chu because he’s my favorite person on planet Earth. I told him, “Anytime you want me to do something, I’m going to say yes.”

Craig: Ouch.

Dana: Oh, no, you guys, I meant that I met after you.

Craig: All right, thank you.

Dana: He’s my favorite person on planet Earth who I met after you two.

Craig: Weird, late clarification.

Dana: In the podcast, we could put that before, as if I said it right before.

Craig: Now people skip.

Dana: Matthew, just swoop it out–

[rewind sound]

Dana: I love John and Craig,

[fast-forward sound]

Dana: Working with John, he’s the most extraordinary director, but he’s so collaborative, also, and he makes me want to be a better man. He’s that guy. I’m like, “I love you, John.” I told him, “I’ll do anything with you,” after he and I work together.

John: I want to back up because you worked with him first because he was a director on your TV series.

Dana: Yes, that’s right. He had shot Crazy Rich Asians, but it hadn’t come out yet, and I needed someone to direct the first two episodes of Home Before Dark, which is my Apple TV series. I met with him and he showed me the trailer for Crazy Rich Asians, which had not come out yet. From the trailer, I was like, “You’re a genius. This is going to hit. This is so universal. This is incredible. I love you. I want you to do this.” I was trying to hire him off of a trailer. I was like, “I don’t need to see anything else. I’m obsessed with him.”

He did the most extraordinary job on the TV show. He brought in Alice Brooks, who is the DP of Wicked, to do my show. He brought in Myron Kerstein, the most brilliant editor you’ll ever meet on planet Earth, to do my show. I got to work with all his people. It was extraordinary.

John: I want to stop you for a second because it’s just such a good reminder of the relationships you form and the trust you form and being able to see what a person is like as a collaborator. You were hiring him, but then he’s actually hiring you because he can see, “Dana gets it. We have a shared vision. I know that she can deliver this thing.”

Dana: Correct. Also, I think John’s very loyal. Once he gets his people around that he knows understands the way he likes to work, he wants to keep them close. I feel so lucky to be in his orbit, honestly, because he’s just extraordinary. I said to him, “I’ll do anything for you. I’ll drop whatever I’m doing whenever I’m doing it, and I’ll say yes.” He called me after I finished Lost City. He called me and said, “I have another one for you.” He had done In the Heights, while I did Lost City and other stuff. He said, “Okay, I have another one for you.” He said, “Do you want to know what it is?” I said, “No.” The answer is yes.

He was like, “I’m going to tell you anyway.” I was like, “No, no, no, let’s do a bit where I’d make part of the deal without even knowing what it is.” I thought that would be funny. He was like, “No, I’m going to tell you, you’re an idiot.” I was like, “Okay.” He said, “It’s Wicked.” I was like, “Oh my God, everybody loves– What is it?” He’s like, “Wicked.” I’m like, “Mm-hmm. I also am one of the people that loves Wicked so much,” because I hadn’t seen it. I’m literally the only American human who had not seen Wicked.

Craig: That’s crazy.

John: What did you say when he said Wicked, you’re like, “Wicked what”?

Dana: Well, I knew of it. I knew it was popular and famous and stuff, but I’m not super dialed in. I discovered Beyoncé two years ago.

Craig: I love it.

Dana: I was like, “You guys, we need to talk. This woman’s incredible.”

John: Oh my God, this is amazing.

Dana: This is always me too late on really important things. I started watching Lost in the last season and was like, “You guys, the Hatch.” Everyone was like, “We’re so over the Hatch, we don’t want to talk about the Hatch.”

John: I like, in a weird way, that you weren’t a Wicked–

Dana: I was not a mega fan. I didn’t know anything about it.

John: Sometimes it’s better to not be burdened by–

Dana: Winnie and Stephen now talk about how helpful it was to have me there, being irreverent and not being so precious, because I just didn’t know. It was the middle of the pandemic, so I couldn’t go to Broadway to see it. I googled everything I could find. I watched the entire play in shaky clips from France, Germany, whatever, blah, blah, put it all together. I was like, “I get it.” I read the play and I played Stephen’s gorgeous music. Whenever the song would come up as I was reading it, I would play the music, and I was like, “Gosh, this is so good. This is so good, the music.” I loved it.

I was, of course, impressed, and also, I had loved My So-Called Life so much. I loved Winnie’s work from that. He said, “We’re going to work all of us together. Me, John, Winnie, Stephen, and you. We’re going to get into Zooms, and we’re going to break both movies together,” which I’d never done before with a director. I was so excited to be able to do it because it felt like every day we weren’t just breaking the story or writing the script, we were making the movie because it was what he wanted to be doing, too. He was telling us about his vision as we were all talking it through. We spent 153 hours on Zoom before we ever started writing. I know it’s a lot. Craig looks so tired from the 153.

Craig: Horrifying, just so much–

Dana: I just looked over at him and he was like, “Girl, eugh.”

John: By the way, the bullet you dodged. All right, yes.

[laughter]

Craig: No, I did not dodge a bullet.

Dana: The bullet hit you squarely.

Craig: Yes, the bullet hit me pretty hard.

John: [laughs] You had all these Zooms before you started.

Dana: Before we even started writing, but that was the ideation period, where we broke them into two movies. We carded them digitally because we were all on Zoom, so we couldn’t see each other. We had digital cards that we had made, and then I started outlining from off those cards. I outlined both movies. Then John basically was like, “Okay, we’re going to split up Movie 1 between you and Winnie, and you guys are going to write it together.” We wrote Movie 1 together as quickly as we could to get it full because we had stages booked.

They were trying to make us feel that pressure. We wrote the first movie, and then I immediately pivoted. While Winnie did notes from John and Mark. I immediately pivoted and started writing the second movie. I wrote the second movie. Then from that point forward, Winnie and I were collaborating, but we were each in a different movie. When I was in Movie 2, she was in Movie 1 and vice versa, but we were still working with each other. It was like I would send her a scene from Movie 2 and be like, “This is hot trash garbage. How would Glinda say this thing, because I’d want her to blah, blah, blah?”

There was a lot of collaboration, but we were in two separate movies. That was how we got the work done. It was super collaborative with John and with Stephen. Then, being a fly on the wall to watch Stephen Schwartz do the two new songs for the Movie 2.

John: It was pretty great.

Dana: It was like childhood Dana lost her mind. It was amazing.

Craig: I have to say that this is a really good example of you’re a good writer. I think I’m a good writer. Some people should be writing certain movies, and some people should not. The thing is, I love Wicked. I love the show, but I was not the right person for that project. You were the right person for that project. That project needed somebody that not only was a writer but also, how would I put it, a clearinghouse, a diplomat, and an ambassador. For all of these people, and also somebody that really enjoys the collaboration of writing with another writer. I’m such a monk.

Dana: Yes, you’re so private. You just want to be in your little room and do your thing.

Craig: This is just a great example. I underscore this all the time, but just in case anybody’s confused, the credits for this movie are spot on accurate. I was happy to support those. I didn’t fight you. [laughs] They’re correct.

Dana: Yes. Winnie had done a lot of work before any of us came on. That’s why she has that solo credit. Only writers will understand that credit, which is Winnie’s solo because she had been working on trying to make this into a movie for 15 years before any of us were involved in the process. That’s why she has that credit. Then AND, which means she worked also with the team of me and her. It’s a weird-looking sandwich of a credit, but it does represent what happened. It was really an amazing experience.

It was very difficult because of all those personalities and all the different things, we all cared so much. Honestly, it was really hard, I think, because we cared so much. We wanted it to be so good. We all felt this profound sense of responsibility to the fans. Then after Movie 1, it was like ratcheted up to a million. The post-process of Movie 2, I would just sit around crying because I wanted to be worthy of people’s expectations of the second movie because it was so important to them.

Then also, the world has gotten even harder. I think people desperately need a time to sit in a theater quietly with their friends and their loved ones and their family and be able to express their emotions about what’s going on in the world or whatever, in a safe place to do that. I know the movie gives you that.

John: As they witnessed the rise of fascism, you see it reflected back in the movie, yes. There’s a potential to triumph over it.

Dana: Of course, we didn’t write it that way because it was five years ago that we started writing it. We didn’t know this was going to be what happened. I just think, unfortunately, the movie is so timely because this is timeless. There are always people looking for power, and they’re going to do it at the expense of the most vulnerable people.

Craig: Steven and Winnie, all the way back when they were first conceiving of the show, and this is something that Mark told me, that there was underneath it a pretty clear allegory for Nazi Germany, for fascism, for people getting disappeared, taken away.

Dana: They were writing it in the shadow of 9/11 and the persecution of the Muslim population in America. That was partly why World War II is so fresh on the mind. If we all remember, right after 9/11, it started to get really off.

Craig: Yes. Wicked, it’s really interesting how it has so many flavors and layers. On the top, it is pink and green, and it’s two best friends.

Dana: It’s floopy, yes, 100%.

Craig: It’s funny and weird. Then underneath it, there’s something bad, something bad coming.

Dana: I think that’s what people are going to love about the second movie, is that it still has all the pink and green and floopy, but it is really about something. It really has a lot of there-there. There’s a lot of there-there for both the consequences within the friendship. The political stuff, of course, is there, and it hits harder now because of what’s happening. The friendship is so beautiful. You feel like you’ve been on this crazy emotional journey. That was another real challenge of writing the screenplay of the second movie was, in the play, there’s all these reprises.

That you’re hearing that you just heard the A side of the reprise 20 minutes ago in the play, but in the movie, you’re hearing the reprise a year later. How do you get the audience to feel the feeling of that reprise the same way they would have if they had heard the A side of it 20 minutes ago? We were constantly thinking about how do we remind them of the things that happened in the first film so that that’s fresh in their minds. A lot of it had to do with planned flashbacks, but also unplanned flashbacks that came out in editing that I think were really strategic and really smart.

Craig: Dana?

Dana: My love.

Craig: What do you think my favorite song from Movie 2 is going to be? I know what it is. I’m just saying, what do you think of this?

Dana: I’m just going to say, I don’t know what I’m allowed to say or not say, but I think that No Good Deed–

Craig: You got the answer. That’s it.

Dana: That’s it. That’s the Craig one. Your brain will exit the back of your head and then come back into it at the end. It’s like the crazy– I lost my mind.

Craig: It’s such a good song. Look, I love For Good. I love it. It’s sweet. It’s adorable. It’s a nice wrap-it-up. No Good Deed is awesome. Having seen Cynthia in Jesus Christ Superstar and watching her turn it to 11.

Dana: You told me about how beautiful that was.

Craig: Yes. I can’t wait to see what she does with that.

Dana: I would reference the song you talked about, but there’s a 100% chance I mispronounce it.

Craig: Gethsemane.

Dana: Gethsemane.

[imitating song tune]

Dana: No Good Deed’s going to kill you. Buckle your fucking seat belt for good, though, because it’s–

Craig: Fuckle your bucking seat belt.

Dana: Buckle your fucking seat belt for that one because that’s a goodbye, everybody. I don’t know why. I hope this makes you, too, also feel really emotional when you’re watching it. Part of my emotional experience with the movie is that there is a feeling, a little bit, that Hollywood is dying.

John: It’s a big Hollywood movie.

Dana: This is a big, beautiful Hollywood movie from the old days. You can’t believe this movie got made.

John: They felt the giant sets.

Dana: I have chills. These giant sets that were real, and everything was real. If it’s out of focus, it’s because a person was doing it. There’s no AI. It feels so much like the movies that got us all to be in this business in the first place.

Craig: It’s going to be massive.

Dana: Oh, I hope so. It’s just so beautiful.

Craig: Hollywood is not dying. It’s just that it’s been the months after summer, the months between summer and Thanksgiving. The New York Times once again wrote an article about how Hollywood is dying. They’re like, “Yes, it’s always dying in September and October.” [laughter] That’s what it does.

John: You forget the article you just wrote about what a big summer it was for blockbusters.

Craig: Right.

Dana: Right. That’s a good point.

Craig: Thanksgiving and Christmas comes and kaboom. It’s going to be huge.

Dana: I hope that Wicked puts the paddles back onto the business too, and clear, and it’s like, [onomatopoeia] but the problem is they never seem to learn the lessons from the movies. They’ll go like, “But that’s just Wicked, so it doesn’t count.” You can’t learn anything from it because it’s Wicked.

John: Another musical.

Dana: Nothing’s ever been like this. You’ll be like, “Okay.”

Craig: Nobody knows, but you know what? You guys did a spectacular job, and I can’t wait to see the second movie. John really is a remarkably talented director.

Dana: I do need you to FaceTime me when both of you, after you see it, because I had a hard time talking about it. I was just wandering around the after-party just like a zombie, and crying in front of famous people was basically what it was. It was just so weird. I was just like, I couldn’t stop crying. It was wild.

John: It was the experience of the movie, but also the trauma of making it a movie.

Dana: I had some health issues during it that were really difficult. The narrative I had in my head was that Wicked was what killed me. Wicked is why I got sick. Then I realized while I was watching the movie that, “Oh, no.”

Craig: Oh, no. Here we go.

Dana: I just realized that Wicked actually saved me. It gave me stuff to do while I was feeling so sick. Every day gave me a reason to get up in the morning and try and care and feel something again. It is what ultimately made me feel better. It’s what got me better from the sickness. It’s not what killed me.

Craig: That’s fantastic.

Dana: That was part of why I was weeping around the stupid after-party, like an animal.

Craig: When you were working on it, before it was in production, you and your husband were in Calgary for some reason.

Dana: Oh, boy. That was a– Yes.

Craig: I was there, and the two of us were just–

Dana: That was my breaking point. That’s where I was like, “I might have to quit because I think I’m going to die.” I was like, “I have to.” You were working on The Last of Us.

Craig: On the first season of The Last of Us, which was chaos.

Dana: You were like, “This is crazy.” Yes, and I was like, “Our health might be in danger.” [chuckles]

Craig: Yes, we were standing in a park going, “We’re dying, right? We’re dying.” [crosstalk]

Dana: Yes, and you were so nice to me. I was like, “I think I’m dying.” You’re like, “It’s okay, because I’m also dying, so we could die together.” Then I encountered a bear, and there was a moment where I was like, “Maybe it should eat me.”

John: Wow, it would be a way to go.

Dana: I was like, “This would be a killer story, first of all.”

Craig: How would I identify with that?

Dana: Then I would get out of doing the rest of this work, which is so intense.

Craig: That is what like writing is so hard that a lot of times–

Dana: That you want a bear to eat you.

Craig: I have told my assistant a number of times, listen, at some point today, don’t approach from the front, but from behind, hit me with a hammer as hard as you can on my head, and just end this, so I don’t have to do this.

Dana: I’m so glad you and John say those kinds of things because– John less so because John is just like–

Craig: John’s healthy.

Dana: He’s just too healthy. I can’t talk to you, John. I’ll talk directly to Craig. I’m so glad to hear you say this, Craig, because you’re so brilliant and so talented. I always think of myself as just a really hard worker. That’s why my work is good. Not because I have any innate talent. I’m just like, I just work harder than everybody else.

John: No. That’s an eldest daughter thing.

Dana: I’m the youngest daughter.

John: You’re the only daughter, right?

Dana: I’m the only daughter, yes. I guess you’re right. I’m still the eldest daughter.

John: The eldest daughter.

[laughter]

Dana: Hearing you say that, Craig, I think that helps me, and also all your listeners who are trying to be writers, that you also feel that way is amazing. [crosstalk] I want to die every day. I’m like, “I cannot believe how hard this still feels to me.”

Craig: Yet, every time I have a chance to stop, and I could stop, I do not stop. I never stop.

Dana: Oh, I could stop tomorrow, and I don’t stop. I’m crazy.

John: No. You’ve set up nine more shows and movies. While you’ve been sitting here.

Dana: While I’ve been sitting here, I set up 42 new things. It’s like I have a problem. I literally have a Post-it note on my desk that says, “Say no.” Then I just said yes to all the things.

John: All the things. All right. Let’s answer some listener questions here.

Dana: Yes, please.

John: James in Vancouver wants to ask about torture.

Dana: We just talked all about torture. [crosstalk] We don’t need to talk about torture. James, that was your answer to your question.

John: You guys always talk about needing to make your characters suffer in order to see them go through the maximum amount of growth possible. However, how much suffering is too much? At what point does it veer into emotional torture porn as opposed to genuine trials and tribulations?

Craig: That’s a good question.

John: I think it’s a very good question. Torture your hero is fantastic. If there’s a moment where it’s like, “I don’t want to watch this anymore,” or it feels gratuitous, I’m going to stop. You have to make sure that you are giving your character some victories, some hope along the way. If it’s just despair, if it’s 1984, people are going to stop. Then you’ve failed as a storyteller, I think.

Dana: I also feel like you ask yourself, what do you want to go through? I have to close my eyes when torture is happening, actual torture is happening in things. I feel almost the same way about emotional torture, which is like, I want to stop just shy of that because I just think that’s gratuitous and weird, and I don’t need to see it. Also, we’re in a world and a time where everything feels like torture. I tend to go with what I feel and what I think the rest of the world is feeling because I’m also feeling it. Craig, what were you going to say?

Craig: I definitely like to echo the feelings that we have, but give people a way to go through these things somewhat safely. Torturing your characters has to be purposeful. Remember, you’re not just torturing them, you are choosing what to do to them. Therefore, you have a plan, and the plan is such that the torture must be matched to their ability to withstand it and then surpass it. The real question, James, isn’t how much should I torture them? The real question is, what would make this person’s victory feel really earned and satisfying?

Dana: That’s great.

Craig: That’s all.

Dana: That’s great. Also, for each individual character, the definition of torture is totally different. For my husband, the definition of torture is me chewing food that he can hear. Literally, that could be an entire scene where he’s tortured. He says it makes him want to actually murder me in cold blood.

John: Misthonia.

Dana: Misthonia. Yes, he has that thing. You can calibrate it based on who the person is because torture is something different for each person, but that’s so smart.

Craig: You calibrate it depending on the person, and you also calibrate it depending on the tone. In comedies, torture could be as “torturous” as, “The girl that dumped me is with the guy that beat me up yesterday, and I have to sit here and watch them dance.” That’s torture. It’s not Zero Dark Thirty torture. [laughs]

Dana: Yes, nobody’s strapped to a chair in that story.

Craig: Right, but sometimes you do strap someone to a chair, and that’s–

Dana: To a cuck chair. Bringing it back.

Craig: If they’re only 200 pounds.

Dana: We’re going to make it a runner. [crosstalk] Don’t worry about it.

John: To recap, when you’re thinking about torturing your characters, you’re thinking about what is it that you want. What is it that makes you feel uncomfortable or comfortable? What do you as the writer want? You’re thinking about the audience. Where is the audience in this? Also, crucially, you’re thinking about the character. What is it about this character and their journey that this torture is allowing them to grow and progress and do the things you’re going to do?

Dana: I particularly like what Craig says because that almost reframes it for me in a way that I understand that question even more, which is what will make their victory feel more earned, which is such a smarter way of saying what specific torture is right for this person and what level. If you think about it, in Wicked Movie 1, we realized, like, since it was ending at Defying Gravity, she can’t be defeating the wizard. That was what her I Want song was about, but she can’t defeat the wizard because she can’t do that until the second movie.

What she had to defeat was the part of herself that didn’t believe that she could do it. That led to all these discoveries of she was going to see herself as a child and all these different things. It led to different forms of torture for her in Movie 1 than are the ones that she experiences in Movie 2. It was all about making those victories feel earned and/or the bittersweet ending feel as sad as possible.

Craig: That’s a good question, though. You know what? Vancouver representing.

Dana: I love Vancouver.

John: One other quick question here from Zach. Was the 1990s a great decade for action movies, or am I just experiencing whatever generation thinks that the decade they grew up in has the best media? Some of the films that he’s listing here are The Fugitive, Bad Boys, Mission Impossible, Independence Day, Speed, Armageddon, Twister, Men in Black, and many others.

Dana: They’re all perfect.

Craig: Amusingly, none of those movies are even in the top 50 of the best movies of the 1990s. The answer is yes. The 1990s were incredible.

Dana: It’s insane. Yes.

Craig: I grew up in the ’70s and ’80s, and I’m here to tell you the ’90s were the best 10 years of movies that I’ve experienced in my life. When I look back at what they did there, it’s astonishing.

John: The danger is that we are all roughly the same age cohort and that we were in our young 20s there. You always think about that period of your life as being like, “Oh, that was fantastic.” The way we would test that is we should get younger people to watch movies of the different decades and have them–

Dana: Shouldn’t that be a follow-up question? [crosstalk] Can you ask your audience, to younger people, “Watch those movies and see if they’re bangers like we think they are”?

Craig: I have been showing great hits of the ’90s to my assistants and the office PAs and basically all the kids that are–

Dana: What do they think?

Craig: It’s been just one home run after another.

John: That’s great.

Dana: That’s great. Will you share that list, though? Share that list. Put that list out for me. Give me your top 10 because I want to watch them.

Craig: This list right here, all these movies are fun, but it’s like he’s not even listening. Pulp Fiction, Goodfellas, Silence of the Lambs. [crosstalk] I can just go on. Fargo. There’s so many incredible movies.

John: He was specifically talking about action in his days. Yes, there are incredible movies. 1999 was a banner year. You look at the movies that came out that year, it was absurd. Yes, you’re right.

Craig: You know what? Fair, Zach. You were talking about action movies. I’ll give you a pass on that. All those were great action movies. The Fugitive is like–

Dana: The Fugitive is a perfect movie. Have I ever talked to you about the movie? Okay, I want to tell. Super quick, though. We may have learned this because we went to the Stark program, so we may have learned this the same. I always learned structure was character, and it was all about how the character’s going through a specific journey. We learned there’s the character’s need and there’s the character’s want. The movie is all about where they start off the movie, where they want something, and they’re making a journey towards needing something.

Wherever they are along the way, those key plot points are always about whether they’re getting what they need or whether they’re getting what they want, that kind of thing. The other thing that I learned was that the protagonist is the character who changes, not the lead of the movie. It’s the character who changes, and the antagonist is the character who causes that person to change. The protagonist of The Fugitive is Tommy Lee Jones, of course. The antagonist is Richard Kimble because Harrison Ford, of course, is the lead of the movie.

Craig: He doesn’t change.

Dana: He doesn’t change at all. He’s like, “I didn’t kill my wife,” in the beginning of the movie. In the middle of the movie, he’s like, “I swear to fucking God, I didn’t kill my wife.” At the end of the movie, he’s like, “I fucking told you I didn’t kill my wife.” Tommy Lee Jones, the whole structure is key to Tommy Lee Jones’s arc in understanding that Richard Kimble is telling the truth.

Craig: Yes. This is all correct.

Dana: That helps me with structure more than anything else.

Craig: Nice.

John: All right. It’s time for our One Cool Things. My one cool thing is sitting between me and Dana. It’s a thing called the Owl, and it’s this little camera device. It looks like a speaker. It looks like a tall speaker, but it has a camera at the top that is a panoramic camera. We’re on a Zoom like we are right now with Craig, and Drew, and Graham. It is showing individual slices, individual shots of me and Dana, so that we actually look well framed in it. It is just a piece of magic. It’s the Owl.

If you’re doing any sort of situation where you have some people in a place and other people are on Zoom, it is a game-changer. When we’ve done other things like this, Scriptnotes, you have to move the laptop back far enough so that everyone can see each other, or there’s a camera up on the wall.

Dana: I’ve done so many things like this, I’ve never seen it work as well as it’s working right now. We’re all seeing each other’s faces. Everybody’s in the frame. It’s amazing.

Craig: It’s really effective.

John: What’s so smart about it is it has the panoramic view, and it shows you at the top, but it’s smart enough to individually slice out when someone is speaking to give them framed as a single.

Dana: I urge every studio to get one of these because all of those Zoom calls I have with you guys, where 27 of you are in one frame, I can’t do it anymore.

John: I was on a Netflix call, and literally, it was like a satellite shot of two executives at a table.

Dana: Yes, satellite, literally, like a Google Earth shot of the Netflix building.

John: It’s hard for me to read it in attention. I’m like, “All right. Do they get it?”

Dana: I was like, “Do they like it? Do they want it?” I can’t tell.

Craig: I’m going to get one of these for the production office. I’m going to get one tomorrow.

Dana: Oh, for the production office. It would kill for that. For production meetings?

Craig: Yes.

Dana: Everybody. Great.

John: Craig, for D&D, when we’re a hybrid, like while you’re up in Canada, game changer.

Craig: Yes. [laughs] John and I–

Dana: Did you just slip in that Craig is doing D&D?

Craig: No, we play D&D together.

John: Play D&D every week.

Dana: Oh, I thought you guys were making a movie together. It’s cute. You guys are cute.

Craig: We are. We’re adorable. We talk about torture. John and I were playing in a game on Thursday evening, where we were subjected to a three-hour pointless combat, where we ended up captured and shoved into a mine.

Dana: Oh, my God. Are you with other people in this story? Who else is in there?

John: Oh, my God. Who’s who? It’s me, and Craig, and Chris Morgan. We’ll talk about it. We’ll tell you after. We’ll sidebar.

Dana: Yes, sidebar. Chris Morgan made it in, though. We all know he was there.

John: Dana Fox, do you have a one cool thing to share with us?

Dana: I would love my one cool thing to be my husband’s podcast, which is called The Most Important Question. It’s mostly about climate change, and science, and all sorts of interesting stuff. Because it’s not a thing, I am going to say my one cool thing is heating pads. Because what it allows you to do is lower the temperature in your bedroom to 55. If you can’t see your breath, you’re not doing it right. Then you get the heating pad so that you don’t die. It allows you to keep the room as cold as you need to keep it. Amazing sleep.

John: Love it.

Dana: Please enjoy.

Craig: That’s good.

John: I also am a big fan of the heated seats in your car.

Dana: Stunning.

John: It can be the middle of summer, but you just want a little–

Dana: Summer? A little back warmer?

John: Yes.

Dana: Heat up that lumbar?

John: Absolutely. Loosen up your back.

Dana: Not getting back pain? Loosen it up?

John: Fantastic.

Dana: Love it. Great story.

John: The new car also has seat coolers, and so it blows air through the seat. Game changer, so you don’t have the sweaty back when you go into a meeting.

Dana: Not to steal another one cool thing, because I totally want to hear one. We also got the ID. Buzz. Let me tell you, this is the electric VW buzz that looks like the hippie thing.

John: You have 19 children.

Dana: We have 19 children. We put them in this hippie bus. We drive around, and it brings so much joy.

John: It’s a beautiful car.

Dana: It’s a beautiful car. We got the peel. People are like, “All right, all right.” Everybody becomes Matthew McConaughey when you drive by. You get peace signs. You get smoking weed signs. We’re in Virginia. We’re in southern places where nobody does shit like that. Everybody is so happy around this car. It’s the cutest thing. My husband got me a little bumper sticker on it. Surprised me one day. It says, “We can’t all come and go by bubble,” on the back of the car. It’s really precious. He’s a great guy.

John: Craig, what’s your one cool thing?

Craig: Yes, please. My one cool thing this week is a set of puzzles, a nice puzzle suite from Eric Berlin, who’s a pretty prolific puzzle constructor. He’s a big participant on one of the big teams in the MIT puzzle hunt that happens every year. This one is actually a great one if you’re thinking about getting into this sort of thing. It’s not far off, difficulty-level-wise, from the one that David Kwong and I ran back in the day at the Magic Castle. This one is called Have Fun Storming the Castle. We’ll include a link for you.

Dana: I went to the David Kwong at the Magic Castle one with you guys. That was great.

John: It was with him.

Craig: Difficulty-wise, it’s right about there. You should be able to get through it. Maybe you might need a hint or two, but probably not.

Dana: I’ve never felt dumber than when I was– I was like, “I’m so smart.” I came in, I’m like, “I’m so smart. I went to Stanford, I’m so smart.” I’ve never felt dumber than that night.

Craig: It’s because you use different skills. This one’s got eight puzzles and then one meta puzzle.

Dana: How do I engage in it? Is it online, or is it on my internet phone?

Craig: Yes, you can pick up your internet, get your internet out of your pocket,-

Dana: Okay. That’s my internet and whatever.

Craig: -turn your internet on. [laughs] Then switch your internet on.

John: Unlock your internet on your face.

Dana: Unlock your internet with my face. Copy that. I know how to do that.

Craig: Exactly. Then follow the link, and it will cost you a whole eight American dollars.

Dana: This is great. That’s a great one cool thing.

John: That is our show for this week. Scriptnotes is produced by [crosstalk]

Dana: Wait, hold on. Don’t do a thing. I love you guys. You’re amazing people, and I really love you, and I miss you, and you’re great, and thanks for being such great people.

Craig: Dana, you are just a permanent ray of sunshine. I can’t explain how happy I was to see Dana in her slanket on that plane. I was so happy.

Dana: Comfort. One of the vowels is gone. I don’t know which one. I can’t help you get the sweatshirt because I don’t know which vowel disappeared.

Craig: Like 70% of people that I know, if I had seen them on a plane in their slanket, I would pretend to have not seen them.

Dana: You would pretend that you had not seen them. 100%. No, I know. I get that about you.

Craig: I’m on a plane. I don’t want to do all that.

Dana: I felt so touched. I was like, Craig usually ignores people on planes. This is special.

Craig: Then Jack McBrayer just chimed in, and we had the best time.

Dana: We had the best time. I really do love you guys, and you’ve been amazing friends and mentors to me forever, and I appreciate you. Truly, I’m so grateful for you guys. It’s hitting me because I’m here in town for Wicked, and that took five years of my life. There are certain people in your life who just don’t leave and don’t stop being amazing, and it’s you guys.

Craig: I will say, Dana, I don’t know if I’ve been changed for the better, but I know that I’ve been changed for good.

Dana: I’m going to get you something. I’m going to get you a present. I’m going to get you some merch. Don’t worry about it.

Craig: I want merch. I want pink, and I want green.

Dana: I’m going to get you a mirror that has lights on it.

Craig: By the way, that’s how you know that no one’s ever sent me a mug.

[laughter]

Dana: I’m going to do it. I’m going to send you the mug. I’m going to send you the Owala water bottle. Everybody loves these water bottles. They did a Wicked collection. I got 72 of them for Christmas presents.

Craig: Good, because Melissa doesn’t have enough water bottles in her house.

John: No, it’s a huge shortage, yes.

Craig: We have a room that’s called Water Bottle Room.

Dana: By the way, I have 757,000 water bottles, and I somehow don’t have enough water bottles. There’s never the cap. It’s never the right thing.

Craig: This water bottle thing– Anyway.

Dana: They’ve got us by the balls. By the way, if anybody wants to have fun, look up Hugh Grant talking about water bottles. It’s a delight. I have a whole side career where I just watch Hugh Grant do interviews. It’s so fun.

Craig: Second one cool thing. I like that.

John: Scriptnotes is produced by Drew Marquardt, edited by Matthew Chilelli. Our outro this week is by Spencer Lackey. To view an outro, you can send us a link to ask@johnaugust.com. That’s also the place where you can send questions like the ones we answered today. You’ll find transcripts at johnaugust.com, along with sign up for our weekly newsletter called Interesting, which has lots of links to things about writing. You’ll find clips and helpful video on our YouTube. Just search for Scriptnotes and give us a follow.

You’ll also find us on Instagram at Script Notes Podcast. We have T-shirts and hoodies, and drinkware, but no cuck chairs. [laughter] You’ll find those at Cotton Bureau. You’ll find the show notes with links to all the things we talked about today in the e-mail you get each week as a premium subscriber. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you to our premium subscribers. You make it possible for us to do this each and every week. You can sign up to become one at scriptnotes.net, where you get all the back episodes and bonus segments like the one we’re about to record on the promo circuit.

Dana Fox, thank you again for joining us on Scriptnotes.

Dana: Thank you for having me. I love you guys.

Craig: Thank you, Dana.

[Bonus Segment]

John: Dana Fox, the reason we get to see you in person in Los Angeles is because you are here doing a promo for Wicked For Good. I just want to talk about the promo circuit because on so many levels, it’s a celebration. Congratulations, you made a movie. It’s out there in the world. You made a series of a new season of television, it’s out there in the world. Then, like, oh my God, you have to just schlep around and promote it. You have to do all the things.

Dana: It looks really fun when people see it, and everybody’s dressed up, and you’ve got all the hair and makeup, and everyone’s like, “You’re great, everything’s great.” It’s so hard. It’s like a job. It’s a real job, and it takes you away from the job you get paid for, which is typing on your computer.

John: You don’t get paid to [unintelligible 01:08:43].

Dana: For months, I didn’t work because I was promoting the first movie, and thank God, we had a lot of people who wanted to talk to us, which was amazing. I felt so lucky, and so I really wanted to take advantage of it. Then it was March, and I realized I hadn’t written a single word for the year. I was like, “Oh my God, I have to pack my entire year worth of work into the next couple of months because the next promo tour is about to start.” That was very intense.

It is a lot of work, and I hate to say that because you imagine normal people with their normal jobs sitting there rolling their eyes at me, being like, “Oh, getting makeup on is really hard.” It’s like I became a writer because I’m terrible at that stuff. I’m so bad at blow-drying my hair. What even is that? It takes hours. I don’t understand it. Then I see the girls, Cynthia and Ari, and I’m like, they look like they’re going to the Met Gala every time they step out. I’m like, that is a lot of work.

John: Hours to get to that place. I remember back when I was in Startup Program, you were just a couple years behind me. There was a writer-director who was talking about, like, “Oh, yes, I do that, but I’m going to have to do the awards season starting for this movie.” Oh, that’s presumptuous. They think that movie’s made up for the awards. He wasn’t wrong. He was just like, he’d been through it before. He knew that, “Okay, those are three months I’m not going to get back.”

Dana: I’m very superstitious, so if something goes well, I have to wear the same clothes. It’s gross. It’s like, I’m that lady. I can’t talk about anything in the future. I’m like, I’m done. The premiere’s on Monday in New York, and I’m going to do that and do a couple more interviews. I’m assuming I’m done because I can’t–

John: You’re not done.

Dana: Ooh, but I can’t say it out loud.

John: Let’s talk about the gendered expectations of this, though, too, because for you need to have a great-looking outfit. Hair and makeup, but also great outfits for things, where Craig and I don’t– We’re just sticking to our suit.

Craig: I got to tell you that [crosstalk]

Dana: No, I was going to say, have you seen Craig lately? Look at his glasses. He looks so cool.

Craig: They send over a stylist who’s a lovely man, and they send over a makeup lady. Now, for me, makeup is, “Can we please make your head not so shiny?”

Dana: That takes a life time.

Craig: That’s really what makeup is. “Can we do something about the eye bags?” It takes about 20 minutes, maybe 30, but–

Dana: I’m in there for two hours and 30 minutes.

Craig: That’s the gendered part, right? That is a big one.

Dana: Can we make her look like she doesn’t have three kids?

Craig: They send over a rack of clothes, and I’ve got to try things on and make decisions. I’m not good at that.

Dana: I think that’s nice that they do that. They’ve done that for me, and I felt so appreciated. I appreciate Universal so much for treating the writer that way in features because, Craig, you’re the writer in a television show, which means you’re like the king of the castle. I’m a writer in a feature movie, which means they’re like, “Who? What’s that girl doing here?”

Craig: They don’t have to do it, and it’s nice that they are doing it.

Dana: They don’t have to. It’s very nice that they’re doing it.

Craig: It’s also a sign of how much they respect and appreciate you. For me, it was interesting hearing you say you had to take all this time off. For me, that stuff happens while we’re in post. It starts happening, I would say, two brutal months, maybe three, and I’m working all day. Then you just have to go and–

Dana: For me, when I have an interview and I have to get glammed, that’s my day. He killed my whole day. Does it do that for you?

Craig: Most of the stuff that I end up doing are interviews. There’s the junket days and all that stuff. The phone interviews or Zoom interviews, I don’t need to do anything. When somebody’s coming for a magazine and they’re doing photographs or you’re going to an event, then, yes. I got to work on a Saturday now because I did this thing on a Thursday.

Dana: Part of the reason that I accepted the whole idea of the stylist and all that stuff was because Franklin Leonard from the Black List pulled me aside and was like, “Writers are always wearing black, they’re hiding, they’re in the background, especially women, and they look like publicists for someone else. Don’t do that.” He’s like, “Wear color, be out front, make yourself look good because that is part of raising the profile of writers in Hollywood.” That’s part of people understanding that we actually work on the movies. We do stuff.

Craig: I have this thing that I think I’ve successfully articulated to the stylist I work with, which is because part of his job is to try and get me to be a little bit more adventuresome in what I wear because I’m not. Where I draw the line is I’m like, okay, but when I’m up there, like we’re doing a FYC event and it’s me and the actors, it’s about the actors. More importantly, I cannot try to even seem like I think I’m as cool as them.

Dana: I’m trying to compare myself to Pedro.

Craig: Exactly.

Dana: 100%.

Craig: I’m Dad. I need to always be Dad. As long as you can keep me Dad, and let the actors have their beautiful aura of coolness.

Dana: As long as it’s clear that I am Ariana Grande or Cynthia Erivo’s nanny, then we’re fine. [laughter] I’m not up there to try to be like them. I do stare at them lovingly during all of the Q&As [crosstalk] and just tear up because they’re just so beautiful and lovely.

Craig: You’re so important to the movie, and John is so important to the movie and the editors and everybody. These events are entirely about the actors. I reiterate this, too. I’m trying to explain this. Because sometimes, especially when we do–

Dana: They do a lot of events where the actors are not there. These are more the craft ones, like the BAFTA.

Craig: Those are fun.

Dana: It’s about craft, and then they really do listen to what–

John: What’s so interesting about those roundtable-y things is that you are having genuine conversations, but you’re done up because you’re taking photos at the same time, and so you’re looking at stuff. I find if I get makeup for something, I feel it the rest of the day, my eyes get itchy, and I hate having it on. I have to scrub it all down.

Craig: What is that? Dana, why do our eyes get itchy?

Dana: It’s the powder in it. Do your eyes get itchy?

Craig: Yes.

John: Yes. From the–

Dana: You guys are allergic to something. You got to tell your makeup artists that they need to do sensitive skin stuff.

John: I think it’s just the powder that they use to keep my shiny head from–

Craig: I think it’s anti-bald powder. Because like John and I, our heads are bounce cards, basically. Whatever they use for that clearly makes your eyes itchy. Honestly, no man can complain about makeup. It’s just like–

Dana: Thank you for saying that, because I, as a woman, feel that I could have been president of the United States if I had not had to blow-dry my hair throughout my entire life, because that is how much time I would have gotten back. I could be the president right now.

Craig: Really, you should have been.

Dana: I mean, please.

John: Dana Fox for president. Once again, we’ve–

Dana: Solved it all.

John: We solved the problem.

Dana: We solved everything.

John: Dana, we love you. Thank you so much for coming on.

Craig: Thank you, Dana.

Dana: I love you both so much.

John: Bye.

Dana: Thank you. Bye.

Links:

  • Dana Fox on Instagram and IMDb
  • Wicked: For Good
  • Graham Rowat
  • Friendship
  • Comfrt travel hoodie
  • Sara Schaefer’s miniature cuck chairs
  • Pittman Inflatable Camping Chair
  • Inflatable Beanless Bean Bag Chair
  • What the Cuck?! | Decoder Ring
  • Wicked the book and the stage show
  • The Fugitive (1993)
  • Owl Labs’ Meeting Owl 3
  • Eric Berlin – Puzzle Snacks
  • The Most Important Question podcast
  • Heating Pads
  • VW ID Buzz
  • Preorder the Scriptnotes Book!
  • Get a Scriptnotes T-shirt!
  • Check out the Inneresting Newsletter
  • Become a Scriptnotes Premium member, or gift a subscription (now with fewer emails!)
  • Subscribe to Scriptnotes on YouTube
  • Scriptnotes on Instagram
  • John August on Bluesky and Instagram
  • Outro by Spencer Lackey (send us yours!)
  • Scriptnotes is produced by Drew Marquardt and edited by Matthew Chilelli.

Email us at ask@johnaugust.com

You can download the episode here.

Scriptnotes, Episode 709: Live at the Austin Film Festival 2025, Transcript

November 12, 2025 Scriptnotes Transcript

The original post for this episode can be found here.

[music]

[applause]

Craig Mazin: Are you guys being paid for this?

John August: I’m going to say, bringing in the warm-up act to get them in the mood, that was really good. It was worth all the hundreds of dollars.

Craig: Yes. Wow.

John: That was great. Thank you for that.

Craig: Sure. Thank you, guys.

[applause]

John: I would say it’s especially impressive that you’re here. Not only were we scheduled against a Rian Johnson premiere, also did you hear this? The Major League Baseball scheduled a World Series game. I’m telling you this now. They scheduled a World Series game against us. Apparently, it’s happening-

Craig: What?

John: -at this moment.

Craig: Yes. I have been told in no uncertain terms that I cannot check the score during this. However, I can tell you right now, it is tied up to two-

John: Which is exciting. Now–

Craig: -in the top of the sixth in Toronto.

John: What I will tell you is that people think, “Oh, John doesn’t like baseball.” The truth is, I like movies about baseball. I liked the episode of Moneyball. We recorded a deep dive on Moneyball with Taffy Brodesser-Akner. If you’re hungering for Craig and I talking about baseball, go back and listen to that episode. Be a premium subscriber.

Craig: I thought you were going to say, “We’ll just do it now.” I see.

John: We can’t recreate the whole experience.

Craig: I think you have agreed that before we get to audience Q&A, I can give us all another update.

John: Hold until then. If you are checking your phone along the way and something happens, cheer on the inside.

[laughter]

John: You can keep that to yourself and save it for the Q&A. All right. Craig, how many times have we done a live show here at Austin?

Craig: Oh, I would say at least twice.

John: More than twice. Eleven times we’ve done a live show here in Austin.

[applause]

John: That’s not counting three-page challenges. We’re doing another live three-page challenge tomorrow. Please come to that if you’d like to. If you want to read the scripts for the three-page challenge, they’re already up on the front page of johnaugust.com. You can read along and see how well-formatted they are on the page. Often, we come here and it’s just fun. It’s just not work.

Craig: Always a great time.

John: This year, we actually have an agenda. Craig, that agenda matches up to the cards that are on your seat.

Craig: I like that you’re acknowledging that I don’t know what the agenda is.

John: No. Craig, we’ve got to sell some books. All right. After 14 years of the Scriptnotes podcast, we now have a book coming out December 2nd. You might think, “Oh, December 2nd. On December 2nd, I will buy that book.” No. We need you to buy that book right now. You need to preorder that book. Here’s what preorders do. Preorders let bookstores know that, “Oh, people really like this book. Maybe we should stock this book.” It lets libraries know, “Oh, hey, maybe we should buy a copy for our readership.”

Maybe it puts us on a New York Times bestseller list, which would not be bad, would not be bad. No, Craig, I don’t know if you got this email, but from our editor, Matthew, who’s fantastic, we’re a month out, and he said, “The numbers look good.”

Craig: Oh, that’s horrible.

John: Yes, because we’re screenwriters, we know that good is bad. Good is not fantastic.

Craig: No.

John: Good is they’re okay.

Craig: There’s only two things, amazing-

John: Amazing.

Craig: -and horrible. There are 1,000 words for horrible. One of them is good.

[laughter]

John: Good. It’s funny that way. The English language is both vast and limited. I’m looking out over here. We have 400 people in this room. A show of hands, who in this room has currently preordered The Scriptnotes Book? Oh, that’s a lot of hands, but I also see a lot of opportunities.

Craig: These were all of the people that preordered the book.

John: More than that.

Craig: Good.

John: Yes. If everyone in this room ordered the book tonight, we have a real shot at getting on those lists that we want to be on, because how cool would it be to have a screenwriting book be on The New York Times bestseller list? That would be cool. It’s scripnotesbook.com. That’s where you see all the places where you can buy it. You can, of course, support your local bookstore. You can buy it through one of the online services. If you want a signed copy, Craig and I signed 500 copies of the book.

Craig: It was pretty screwed up because we thought we were going to sell 500 copies of the book. You guys got to really step up.

John: Yes, you got to buy all of them. Please, tonight, if you would, preorder the book. It really does make a big difference ordering it now versus December 2nd.

Audience Member: Just did.

John: Thank you very much. This man is a hero. All right, another here. If we get one more. All right, we got three. All right, I’m going to ask again at the end of the show how many people in this room have ordered that book tonight.

Craig: I may be able to afford the flight back to LA.

John: That’s the hope.

Craig: This is really great.

John: He bought a one-way ticket. This may be the thing that gets Craig home.

Craig: I commit.

John: You did commit.

Craig: I commit.

John: We have an amazing show tonight. We have a conversation about relationships and really not just what our heroes want, but what our heroes want of the other characters and that two-sided relationship. We’re also going to talk about career transitions, which feels really right for this audience because I see a lot of people in this room who may be transitioning from one career into a writing career. We have a guest who’s done exactly that. We’re going to talk about what that process is like, what that jumping off the cliff feels like. I’m so excited to get into all this.

Craig: It’s going to be great. Then there’s also some other fun stuff that we’re going to do in this audience Q&A.

John: We have another game in here that I’ll be thinking about if this next one is really keyed into who our super fans are. If you’re a super fan of Scriptnotes, this next one’s going to be for you. “Hi, I’m a super fan,” our first guest. Do you want to introduce her?

Craig: Yes. Our first guest is a screenwriter whose credits include Moana, Nimona, Ralph Breaks the Internet, and the Academy-nominated short film with the best title of any Academy-nominated short film-

John: Yes, I agree. I love saying it.

Craig: -or any Academy-nominated film of all time, My Year of Dicks. Of course, she’s a native of Austin, Texas, and a five-time Scriptnotes guest. We really should be getting these folks a nice smoking jacket. Welcome, Pam Ribbon.

John: Pam Ribbon. Oh my gosh.

[applause]

Pamela Ribbon: Yes. Where is my smoking jacket?

John: We need to get you one. Aline has the gold diamond one. You’ve been on the show a lot, and you’ve also been just a great guest again and again.

Pamela: Thank you. I pre-ordered Scriptnotes from Skylight Books, October 11th.

John: Yay. Thank you very much, Pamela Ribbon. In addition to the podcast, we have a newsletter called Inneresting. It’s interesting, but the second N is an N because Aline makes fun that I can’t say interesting with a T. It’s called Inneresting. We have a newsletter. Chris, our editor, came up this week with a post of his own that I thought was terrific. It’s talking about relationships between two characters and a sort of matrix on how much they are aligned and the affection between the two of them. It was a great way to think about relationships.

I want to pose to the three of us, let’s talk about relationships in our scripts and relationships between characters because we so often focus on what a character wants, but we don’t focus on what characters want from other people and how that misalignment is really a source of conflict in our stories. Who wants to field it first?

Pamela: I’ll say something that’s true. I hear in my head, Craig, I don’t know when, I’m sure it was a podcast, but not at my face, this feels weird, you giving me this advice, but you said all movies are about the human experience and the relationships. That is in my head whenever I start any story.

Craig: I got that from Lindsay Doran. Really, it’s Lindsay Doran in your head. She got it from Sydney Pollack. Sydney Pollack is in all of our heads now. He used to say when they were working on a screenplay that somebody else was writing, one of the questions he would ask is, “What is the central relationship of this story?” Which in and of itself requires us to focus in on which one matters the most. Then I guess the question is, when you think about that relationship, I know this is the way I think about it, do you construct characters, and then put them in a relationship, or do you construct a relationship, and out of that, figure out character?

Pamela: It depends on if your protagonist is already well-defined, then you want to find who’s going to drive that character crazy. If you know that it’s a world, then Planes, Trains and Automobiles of like, “How can these people have to be forced together and push each other’s buttons? I always try to figure it out mostly from the point of view, which is when you know what your theme is. Then everybody is orbiting around this concept of whether these two are going to make it.

John: When you think about relationships, so often you think about, “Oh, romantic relationships.” That’s the default thing, but any two characters have a relationship. They could be work friends. Craig and I have a complicated relationship, a good relationship but complicated. There’s tension.

Pamela: It’s a rom-com.

Craig: It’s simple for me.

John: Simple for you. What I think is crucial is that they may not be aligned. One person may have one perception of a relationship that’s different than the other person’s. It’s not just about looking at a relationship from, “Oh, what is this relationship?” It’s like, “What does this character think the relationship is, and what does the other character think this relationship is, and what changes over the course of the story, and how do each of them affect change upon that relationship?”

I want to talk about Nimona for a second because in Nimona, you have the central guy and the girl who’s not really a girl. Their relationship is complicated and evolves, and I’m sure evolved a lot over the evolution of the script and the story.

Pamela: Nimona is a very strong character. Moana had Maui. I’ll just say that you’re trying to balance whose film is this for that central relationship. You have someone who’s questioning everything up against someone who never questioned anything before and thinks, “This is the only way it is. This is how I grew up. My life is because of this system. Now, I’m starting to see that none of it’s real. Now, I’ve got the worst person, Nimona, with me to go through this,” and then you make that relationship test whether or not it’s even real. This was a movie about, like Nimona says, everything is broken. The whole system is broken. What if you just look past what you have been told not to see?

Craig: In that, you start to see how– We all understand that when a hero is facing off against a villain, they’re struggling over power. James Bond versus Blofeld, they’re fighting over who is or is not going to destroy the world. In all relationships, it seems, it’s worthy to pay attention to the power because one person almost always has more power in the relationship than the other. The question is which one, why, and then how do I flip it? It’s usually the case that just as characters change over the course of the movie, the relationship needs to change over the course of the movie.

You mentioned Planes, Trains and Automobiles. Steve Martin has all the power, all of it, until suddenly he doesn’t. That’s what makes that movie beautiful. Talk a little bit, if you could, about how you think about who has the upper hand and how that might help you as you’re wondering, I know what has to happen plot-wise, but what is this scene actually going to be?

Pamela: Oh, that’s such a good question. I think it’s someone very stubborn about their point of view, and they’re going to have to change. You throw someone at them that is an undeniable force of change. They’re just coming right at your heart. Usually, that’s who we put the sweet one as, the kind one, so that you’re rooting for this change. Whether or not they work out. That’s why Bing Bong dies. You want the thing coming at you. Spoiler alert.

John: Sorry. I’m sorry.

Craig: Sorry.

John: The movie’s out there.

Pamela: Score is three-two. I’m not going to tell you who’s up.

[laughter]

Pamela: Just kidding. I’m just kidding. I don’t know. I’ve talked to you the whole time. He’s right at his heart. You want someone who’s going to mess up that status quo of that relationship.

Craig: This is a demonstration of what power is in a relationship, what you just did.

John: We’re talking about power in a relationship, who is doing the thing to the other person. I want to direct us back to what does the character want from the other person? You see people talking about love languages. “What is it that a person is seeking from the other character? Are they getting it? Are they getting it in the way that they need to get it? How do they communicate what it is that they actually want? Does the character need to be seen? Does the character need to feel invalidated? Does the character just need a big hug?” You look at Wreck-It Ralph or you look at any of these characters, they need different things.

They have a hard time learning the language to talk to the other character. That’s actually some of the journey of the script. If they knew it from on page 35, there wouldn’t be a movie. The problem would be solved. It’s not just that they’re trying to change the other character. They’re trying to understand the other character and get the other character to see them as they see themselves.

Pamela: They also need that other character to be a true mirror.

John: That’s the construction.

Craig: That’s the– well done.

Pamela: That felt better than it should have.

Craig: There’s that Wizard of Oz theory that all of the characters are just fragments of Dorothy’s personality. One method is that you have a strong central character and the relationship that that character has with another one, and really all the relationships that character has will be in service of them changing. All of those people through the relationship and you letting them down, making them happy, you change. The other model is that the relationship is the story. Romantic comedies, the relationship is the story. They will tend to lean it towards one person who just needed to learn, but really, it’s the relationship. I have to say, I think in animation, they do a really good job of that. Better than, I think, live action.

Pamela: Also, we come at it so open-hearted. It allows for that love story to– I just keep thinking of the word shipping, because you’re rooting for these characters to just survive everything. Just a side note, my kid is 12 was like, “Hey, I just learned that shipping is about a relationship.” I said, “What do you think?” She said, “I thought it meant that you love someone so much that you go on the Titanic.” I was like, “That is what it means.” I was like, “You mean that you’d let someone be on the door?” She was like, “Yes.”

John: Oh.

Craig: Oh my God. You got that door kind of love. That floating door kind of love.

Pamela: That shipping.

John: He could have gotten on the door.

Pamela: [unintelligible 00:15:14] was the ship.

Craig: Oh, I thought that it meant like, “I love you so much, I will do one of those horrible cruises with you.”

[laughter]

John: I want to circle back to this question about animation, because I do feel like Nimona, Moana, these relationships are really well done in animation. I wonder if it’s partly just the process. The process of you’re going through iteration after iteration, you’re really seeing what’s working there, and you can narrow down and drill into it, versus as we shoot live action, “We shot that scene, we’re done. We’re not going to go back and reshoot that scene again.” That is an advantage.

Pamela: There were many Mauis, because you could take over the film pretty easily. Then you also have all the myths, and which Maui do you want? Is it the Maui who in the end lifts up all the islands and discovers Polynesia, or is he a broken demigod? One of the early versions, she was this big Maui nerd, and she was so excited that she had met Maui. He was just this defeated monster in a cave who didn’t want to be talked to.

John: That’s a good idea, but it probably didn’t serve the rest of the movie. The animation has the luxury of exploring the bad ideas and hopefully getting back on the right path.

Pamela: It gave him the movie, because she was just urging him to come out and come out and come out. There is a line in Moana where I’m like, “That’s the old version,” because she says, “Maybe we were all here for you to realize you’re Maui.” She handed him the movie for a second. I don’t know. I think you always want Moana to win so that when she loses, it is because she learned something from Maui.

Craig: The relationship reinforces who she is. It is far less interesting to watch somebody learn something on their own. It’s really less interesting to watch somebody learn something easily. Having somebody else point out that either you think you learned the lesson and you didn’t, or you haven’t learned anything at all, is helpful. I do think about John Candy confronting Steve Martin. Where you understand that Steve Martin, yes, Thanksgiving is about family. Sure. That relationship made me care about the statement, “Thanksgiving is about family.”

It would not have worked had you not, A, been invested in that relationship, and B, also being even. Steve Martin gets angry at John Candy reasonably. He’s infuriating. He has to be. He has to be. All of that comes out of relationship, as opposed to just characters next to each other.

Pamela: We also see ourselves in both of them. That’s why you want them to come together and heal the both terrible sides inside of you that they are at their worst at in a movie like that.

Craig: I have definitely done this with food. I’ve flicked it right off myself, John Candy style. Absolutely.

John: Now, I would say our feature bias is probably coming through here because we’re talking about feature films that have a clear arc. They have a beginning and an end, and things go through. I want to stress that the importance of relationships is obviously crucial to series television as well. You think about all of the individual relationships in The Office and the differences between them in Brooklyn Nine-Nine, how specific that is. Obviously, our great one-hour dramatic television, how important those are.

Kate and Jack, but also all the other survivors on Lost, you’re tracking where are these characters with each other at all times, and what do they need from each other, what are they trying to get from each other? It’s so tempting to think about characters’ individual goals, but there’s goals within each relationship as well.

Pamela: Craig, when you know you have to kill off a character–

Craig: Like Bing Bong.

Pamela: Like Bing Bong. When you know you’re having to take some character that has been established, so loved, so perfect that it’s the moment they must die, this is for both of you, but do you feel bad?

Craig: Yes, of course, because it’s about the relationship. That particular scene, I think you’re talking about what I think you’re talking about. Are you talking about–

John: Chernobyl, yes.

Craig: You’re talking about Chernobyl.

Pamela: Chernobyl. Remember when you had to kill everyone?

Craig: You’re talking about-

John: The Hangover III.

Craig: -the fourth diver in Chernobyl?

Pamela: I just think it was one, it made the trades. That’s a big death.

Craig: It’s a big death. I remember when Mark Mylod, who directed that episode so beautifully, we were sitting there without anyone. It was just the two of us in that room. We were looking around, “Where? Where? Where?” Really, what it came down to is, I think he needs to be here because she’s going to come in here, and they need to look at each other the entire time. They need to be this far apart. They need to be not so far apart that they’re too far apart, but not so close together that they’re too close together. Just the right amount of far apart because it is entirely about what it means to be connected to somebody in a relationship and be pulled away from them, as we often are with everybody in our lives.

You have moments of ebb and flow. You feel yourself drifting away from somebody, but it’s a rubber band. It’s not something that broke, and you then come back in that moment. All of it was focused through relationship. All of it, eyes, the whole thing.

Pamela: Someone mentioned Past Lives today. That’s it, right? You have a relationship that’s been established, and then a relationship that is mostly in the imagination and potential. Then you’re sometimes rooting for it to stay there.

Craig: Yes, exactly.

John: Let’s wrap this up by talking about technique. What we’re doing on the page to communicate where people are at in the relationship. Let’s think about how do we get insight into what the characters are thinking. Obviously, they can say things, but more importantly, we as an audience need to get a sense of each individual character, what they really want, and how do we find moments with each character separately so we can read what that is, or that we can, as an audience, understand a thing that they’re saying the other character doesn’t understand it the same way. That’s subtle, but it’s so important.

When you do that right in a scene, it really transforms what’s happening there. You think, “Oh, that’s the actors, that’s the performances, their chemistry.” No, if it’s not on the page, it’s not going to make sense. You have to be able to read it and get like, “I get why this is heartbreaking.” In Big Fish, I understand the dynamic between Will and Edward because I see each of their points of view, and I’m rooting for both of them. I’m rooting for the relationship to get all together to be healed, and yet, I know how hard it’s going to be because I understand how stubborn each one of them is.

Craig: Yes, when you’re writing a scene, especially between two people, which is my favorite, and it’s where you can focus it all down to relationship, every single thing somebody says should have an impact on the other person. Even if that impact is to make them think, “Oh, we agree, which is encouraging to me. I didn’t realize we agreed as much as we do.” That means they changed, and then mess it up, and then mess it up, and surprise, and go back and forth.

Every single thing that is said needs to have an impact. In our lives, we have conversations all the time where one person is saying the following, and another person’s listening along going, “Oh, that’s interesting. That’s interesting. Here’s something,” and the other person, “Oh, that’s interesting.” No one wants to watch that.

John: No.

Craig: No one.

Pamela: That’s for podcasts.

Craig: That’s for podcasts. That is what a podcast is. I feel hurt.

[laughter]

Craig: You did the thing. Everything, think about all of it. Never give yourself a break there, but all of it is an opportunity then, therefore, to make a conversation about the relationship, and then think about every scene. “Where were these two people in the beginning? How are they on the way out?” Animation, again, because it’s so expensive, every single moment has to be thought like that.

Pamela: $1 million a page. That’s what they said to me. They’re like, “Was this page good?” I’ll go work on that page. I can do some more. This is my improv background, but I always think find the game. Do they play your game? That’s when rom-coms take off. Sometimes, my favorite, bring it on, it’s toothpaste scene, not a line, not a line, but they’re brushing and spitting, and they’re looking at each other, and they’re teasing each other, they’re testing each other, and they’re playing a game. By the end of it, you’re like, “I want this. I want this to keep happening.”

Craig: That’s great. That’s a great example.

John: All right. It is time for our second guest. Would you like to introduce our second guest?

Craig: Yes, I would love to. Our next guest is a showrunner, educator, father, and PhD, so screw us, whose credits include Queen Sugar, The District, The Blacklist, and Bel-Air. Please welcome Anthony Sparks.

John: Anthony Sparks, welcome.

[applause]

Craig: Was anybody in the pitch contest last year, perhaps?

John: These three.

Craig: Yes, we were–

Anthony Sparks: The band is back together. Yes, we’re back and ready to ruin your lives again.

John: Anthony Sparks, in the little bio intro, we talked about your PhD and all these amazing things. Of course, I buried the lede. You were also in Stomp.

Craig: Exactly.

John: You’re a Broadway actor on Stomp. That is where you were starting to do your work, getting into writing. Are you literally backstage writing scenes? Tell me about that.

Anthony: I am. I actually sometimes call Stomp my first writing job-

John: All right.

Anthony: -because I was playing, basically, in classic nomenclature of theater, I was the wise fool in the show. When everybody else would ding, I would dong. The show is written but improved at the same time in pockets. I had a lot of improv. My job was to connect with the audience. The directors were crazy enough to rely on me to change my show every night. I must have done 1,000 Stomp shows. I never did the same show twice. I just had to hit the punchlines, which means I failed a lot on stage in front of hundreds of people, but I would also hit.

I started thinking, “What is my next act? I had always privately written in high school and things like that. I decided that I was going to be a writer next as a practical answer to some things and a creative answer to some things that I was thinking about. I literally started teaching myself how to write TV. I’m sad to say, I missed a few or was late to a few entrances because I was engrossed in my script backstage. That was my sign that, “Oh, maybe it’s time to leave.” [unintelligible 00:25:58] is always working on scripts backstage at Stomp.

Craig: When you said like, “I taught myself how to write TV,”-

Anthony: To a degree.

Craig: -to a degree, how–

Anthony: I’m sure a lot of people here are like, “This is the early aughts,” late 90s, and there are TV writing books and books about the TV business, but not as many as there are now. I was able to get my hands on a couple of books, and I read them. I started just dissecting TV. I started watching. At the time, I thought I was going to be a comedy writer because I had written this satiric play that was getting some attention in New York City that I would put up on my days off from Stomp. I was young and had a lot of energy and was glad to say that I used it.

Just the fact that you had to come at it from a structural standpoint, I knew dialogue, I thought, from theater and plays, and I knew the feeling of structure, but I didn’t know structure to the extent that you go into a writer’s room, you’re able to actually contribute to story advancing. I would say that’s a process that’s probably never-ending for all of us.

John: Sure.

Craig: I suspect that it wasn’t an accident that you were the person the director was relying on stage to change things. I’m sure there were quite a few people on that stage of the director would be like, “Never, ever.”

Anthony: No.

Craig: “You do the bang that lid there then,” and you had a sense of it already. It’s just that you needed then to figure out, “How do I get this instinct from instinct level to craft?” That perfect term.

Anthony: Absolutely. I can’t say that process was complete because is it ever, because otherwise, the same person who won an Oscar last year would win this year because they just repeat it. There is an X factor to writing. In terms of fundamentally understanding story, that process, so I was able to write to the point where I was able to get into fellowships. I was in New York. At that time, there was no TV writer business in New York. There is somewhat now. I was applying to the Warner Brothers writers program. I was applying to the Disney fellowship from New York, getting close but no cigar in some cases until finally, I got one.

Craig: Let’s pause there for a second because I suspect a lot of people here have gotten close but no cigar. I’m sure that’s a feeling you’ve all had. It’s a bad feeling because you don’t know if maybe there will ever be a cigar.

Anthony: Absolutely.

Craig: What keeps you going in the hopes of a cigar?

Anthony: Wow, that’s a deep question.

Craig: Yes, man.

Anthony: What keeps you going? I think there are some people who will go for those fellowships because they’re really hard to win. It’s $1,000, $2,000, $2,500 play. It feels like a crap shoot, and on some level, it is. I know plenty of writers who never got those fellowships who are king and queens of the world in TV and film. I also have met a lot of people who applied once, didn’t get it, and was like, “You can’t win anything.” It was one, you wrote one script. Maybe you think it was great. Maybe it actually was, but a person read it after they had a bad tuna sandwich and took it out on your script. It happens.

If you’re a writer, writers write, and you can’t stop after one script. You just cannot. You just can’t. Writers write. You keep putting the coins in the machine. For me, I applied once to Warner Brothers. I had just gotten married. I got married really young, and I had just gotten married, and I applied, and I didn’t get in. For whatever reason, they were having this one-day workshop on a Sunday in Burbank where they were going to talk about what we’re really looking for. I don’t know if that particular batch of scripts that year was really bad or whatever, but they were doing this outreach.

I said to my wife, “You want to go on a working vacation to LA, so I can go to this workshop on this talk in Burbank?” We did. We literally turned into a working vacation. We flew out here, and I went and sat in the audience and took a bunch of notes. There was hundreds of people there, asked some questions, and I went back and took that back, and I wrote a new script, and I got in the next year.

Craig: There are hundreds of people here who are going to be asking questions.

John: Absolutely, yes. Anthony, one thing that really impressed me about talking with you is that you worked really hard. You get knocked down, you pick yourself up. That’s fantastic. I think you also constructed a life that if your writing career never happened, you still had a lot of very meaningful things you were doing. Can you talk to us about the decision? I know you got staffed on a show, but then you also got into a PhD program. You’re balancing those two things.

Anthony: Exactly.

John: Now, you’re a doctor. Talk to us about that decision and what you’re thinking as you’re going through all this.

Anthony: My bio, to some degree, on a good day, looks like I had this master plan for my life. Indeed, I did think a lot about, my wife and I call it, composing your life. It was something that when we first came out here to LA, we went to go hear Maya Angelou speak, and she spoke that. I don’t know. For some reason, we were very impacted by that phrase, compose your life, which means just try to be intentional, try to put some things together. I am mostly a product of just being hard-headed. I should have quit my PhD program five times.

Craig: You’re not a good doctor?

[laughter]

Anthony: As a few professors was like, “You can leave.” I was like, “No, I’m Pearly Mae, boy. We don’t quit.” I am. I’m a hard-head South Side of Chicago by way of Mississippi kid. Those things don’t normally go together. There’s only 24 hours in a day. The day that I almost dropped my baby daughter because I was so tired was a moment where I was like, “I’m quitting. I’m doing too much. I’m exhausted.” This child is three months old. I almost just dropped her on a concrete ground.

Craig: They bounce. They’re fine.

Anthony: Yes. It only takes five seconds.

[laughter]

Anthony: Although there is a text chain today about these migraines that she’s having.

John: A little stressed. Almost, but did not drop his daughter.

Anthony: I did not drop her. What was the question?

John: Going back to finding balance.

Anthony: The balance.

John: There’s a moment where you’re like, “I’m trying to do too much. Also, I love that.” Choosing to do this PhD program and finishing this PhD program, you are giving yourself many opportunities. You’re giving yourself many opportunities just to see it on many different things. All your eggs are on in this one basket and your identity is this because your identity is as a professor you’re teaching, but you’re also a showrunner, and you’re a father and a writer who does his own things as well. You are composing your life like Maya Angelou suggested you do.

Anthony: The only thing I needed to do was to try it. I’m the son of a mom who had a sixth-grade education. It was very hard for me when USC offered me funding for five years to the total of about $300,000, like the little kid from the south side of Chicago. I’m like, “I got to try and make this work. Win one for the ancestors, seriously.” When my show unexpectedly got canceled, the thing that happened was I got staffed. I got the funding. I got the fellowship. I said no to the fellowship because I’m going to go write. My show got canceled. I was like, “Does health insurance come with that?”

There was a practical side to it. I said, “I’m going to start,” because I noticed my first year on the show that I was on as a staff writer, I noticed I was in my office a lot reading. I was like, “I could be reading a book and getting credit for this.” I didn’t know that that’s not how all shows operate. I have been the beneficiary or what results from saying yes to the door that happens to be open at that time.

Craig: I think that’s a wonderful thing. That’s certainly something that I think people who don’t come from privilege feel. The open door is not tempting. The open door is necessary because the doors are usually closed. What I love about your story is you took away some of the innate fear that, “I made it. I made it. I broke in.” People are always asking us, “How do you break in?” The answer is there is no breaking in. You get broken. You think you got broken in, and then show’s canceled, LOL. You had something else to do. You did not go, “Yes. I made it. I’ve arrived. The end,” because it is not a smooth path. I do think that it makes you a better writer when you’re not writing scared.

Anthony: Yes. It was a scary time. This happened because I said earlier today, I got staffed and I was like, “Hey, let’s have a baby.” We did. Then the show was canceled, but you can’t take her back.

[laughter]

John: Also, you weren’t stopping your decision to have a family based on, “If I get writing success, then I will start the rest of my life.” You started your life. That’s a crucial lesson to learn as well. I think sometimes we fall into– we write heroes, we write protagonists, and we assume they have to go through this arc and do all this stuff and have a plan for how it’s all going to be. If you’re not exactly on that plan, then it’s a disaster. That’s not real life. What I like is that you are just like, “No, I’m starting now. I’m starting on things that are important to me now.”

You got married young. You started having a family young, and that’s awesome. As we wrap up, though, I want to talk about teaching because Craig and I, people who have listened to the show, sometimes have opinions about university screenwriting programs, which can be challenging.

Anthony: As you should.

John: I’m really curious, what do you get out of it? What, as a professor, do you take from teaching? You don’t have to.

Anthony: Quite a bit.

John: You do it because you want to, I’m sure.

Anthony: I do it because I want to. It certainly isn’t the money. I am a product of a serious succession of teachers who just kept giving me shots, creating opportunities for me, believing that I was worthy of them. It did get into my bones, that that is what you do. You educate yourself, you learn, you earn, and then you return, as Denzel Washington once said. That is part of me, genuinely. That’s the Pollyanna part of me. The other part of me is that it’s a very practical way for me, not so much with money, but just in terms of I’m always engaged in story.

I don’t walk into rooms desperate because I’ve built out these other areas of my life without compromising my commitment to what it is that we all get to do. It also is practice for me as a showrunner when I’m not running a show. I have to break down story and teach it to people who are in a very different place than I am. I am a better, much better writer since I started teaching.

Craig: Amen. Listen, if everybody had your resume and your validity and your experience, then I would say everyone rush out to go to school. There are other ways to get me, we do this. There are other ways, of course, to do that. One thing I love about what you’re saying is I feel like doing this over the course of all these years made us better-

John: Of course.

Craig: -at what we do because we have to think about it.

Anthony: There’s no way. Many of us make our bones. Writers write a lot by instinct. You can be a great writer who writes by instinct, but I think at some point, when you’re writing and it’s your profession, no one’s waiting for you to feel the muse coming. That’s where craft kicks in to get you from those moments of inspiration to inspiration, which lifts something to a new level. In the meantime, it’s grinding it out. It’s craft. It’s thinking about– Absolutely. I’ve listened to your podcast. I’m ear-hustling. I’m trying to be cool and not be seen taking notes, but I’m definitely taking notes.

Craig: Ear-hustling. That’s the best phrase ever.

John: Ear-hustler.

Anthony: Everybody up here is worthy of being up here for lots of different things. Being a writer is a little bit of a lifetime student thing. Even when you do it well and you’ve had these accolades, hopefully, you’re always, at the end of the day, staring at that blank page going, fade in, “Oh, shit.”

John: Yes. Anthony, thank you very much for joining us here.

Craig: Thank you so much.

John: Great. Now it is time for one of our favorite, but also potentially terrifying segments where we invite the audience up to ask some questions of us and our panelists. Hello. What is your name and what is your question?

Jason: My name is Jason. You can all answer this. What is the first thing you do when you feel stuck in a script?

John: What is the first thing we do when we get stuck in a script? Pamela, what’s the first thing you do when you get stuck in a script?

Pamela: I complain. I complain about it. I walk around the house with this face. Everyone thinks I’m mad at them. I’m like, “I’m thinking.” I have my thinking face. Then you try to figure out why you’re so irritated because you think, I know how to do this. Why don’t I know how to do this right now?
What that is why you’re stuck. That’s the problem you’re solving. Then you go talk to someone else about your problem. Then they tell you their problem. Then you help them with their problem, and then they help you with your problem.

Anthony: Getting an outside perspective. When we’re writing, we’re making a thousand different decisions that we hope will somehow add up to something that is compelling and believable, so sometimes the outside perspective. If I can’t get that, I will sometimes step back and simply ask myself, what is the logical thing that would happen here?

I can get overly whatever in my head, and so break it. What is the simple thing? Not what is the interesting thing. That comes after. What’s the logical thing that this character would do or feel or say in this moment to at least make the dots connect, and then I can go back and try and find a way to make it–

I sometimes will say when I’m leaving a room, like, “Let’s do the boring expected version, get it up on the board. This will, in no way, be what’s in the script, but let’s at least make it make sense, and then we can go back and make it interesting.”

Craig: That’s great. Both of you, great advice. I sometimes feel myself trying to solve the problem, then I stop myself because you’re not going to solve it well if you’re trying to solve it because you’re thinking about it like a problem. Then I just go, okay, I’m going to forget about the problem. Let me just think about my characters. Let me just put them in different scenes. Let me play around in my head. Let me take a long shower. Let me think about this.

Let me also, and I’ve gotten much better about this, look at this as good news. It’s actually good news. We tend to think that if we’re stuck, we’re dying. We’re not. It just means we don’t see it yet. You will, and you will because you know you don’t have it. That’s how you know you will see it because you’ll know it when you know it. It’s coming. You just got to let it come.

Pamela: It’s the puzzle lover in you. I try to remind myself, this is just a puzzle I haven’t solved, and if this was a crossword puzzle, I wouldn’t be this mad.

Craig: Exactly.

John: For me, I make a deck of cards called Rider Emergency Pack, which is for this purpose. It’s the little things I do when I get jammed up in a thing. You can find it in stores or Amazon or wherever. The philosophy behind it is, sometimes you just really need to change your focus. A card will be magnified. What if you were to zoom in super tight on this thing or on this character or zoom all the way out? What if you were to change genres?

Imagine this is a spy thriller rather than this comedy that you’re writing. What would be the solution to that kind of movie? Getting yourself off this track that is jammed into this place and realizing, oh, there’s a whole range of possibilities I’m just not considering, that tends to help.

The other thing which is true for all of this is that when you hit a problem, rarely is the problem right where you’re at. The problem was a while back, and you probably just need to lay some different tracks to get around this thing that’s in front of you. You may be imagining a perfect solution to this problem that really does not exist. Really, to create a different situation doesn’t end up in the same place.

John: Cool. Great question. Thank you so much. Thank you all. That was honestly a paradigm example of an actual question.

Craig: It was a master class in asking a question. No pressure.

John: No pressure. Now, what’s your name and what’s your question?

Craig: Hi, I’m Im Tay. As an actor by training, I was taught that acting rests on a three-legged stool of imagination, relaxation, and concentration.

John: Wow, Craig.

Craig: I was wondering if there is a similar kind of philosophy when it comes to writing. If so, what’s the hardest leg for each of you and how have you worked to develop that?

John: Remind us of the three things that you were taught, so imagination.

Craig: Imagination, relaxation, and concentration.

John: Those are really great principles. I haven’t articulated something like that of what those things are, but those are all crucial things as we’re putting ourselves in a place and watching what happens, which to me is what writing largely is.

Pamela: To capture the true moment. I get that that relaxation part is so important because I was like, writers have an 18-leg stool. [laughter] Then we were like, “I think I have too many legs.” That key, I think, is the relaxation to let the moment come and to breathe with your script and to just be okay.

John: Honesty is somewhere in there. Are you being honest to the moment? Are you being honest to these characters? Are you trying to force a thing that’s not supposed to be there? Relaxation is probably part of that. Really, it’s like, is the scene true? Is the moment true or is it fake? Does it feel fake within the context of this script?

That’s a crucial thing for me, too, because sometimes when we’re talking about problem solutions, there’s a fake solution. There’s a thing which is, this is not honest to the thing. You’re always going to hate it because you know that you lied to get there.

Craig: I wish I had good stool legs for you. I think, ultimately, in acting, those are three great things to consider. None of them will help you if you’re not a good actor. All of them will help you if you’re a good actor. There is something that is instinctive to artists and craftspeople.

Sometimes the answer is to say, “Okay, I’m not good at everything as a writer. What am I good at? What is that telling me right now? Let me listen to that because that’s what I’m good at.” Follow that. The rest is absolute mystery to me. I got to be honest. I don’t know where I go. I don’t know how I do it. When I read things that I’ve written in the past, I’m terrified because I don’t know who wrote that and I don’t know how to do it again.

John: Same.

Craig: Don’t remember it. I was gone.

John: I’ll read something and I’m like, “Oh, that sounds like me,” but I have no recollections. I don’t know who these characters are.

Craig: That’s terrifying actually. There you go. It’s like an upside-down stool with one leg. Think of it that way. [laughter] That’s what it’s like.

John: Crazy. That’s crazy. Thank you so much for your question. Good question. Hello. What’s your name and what’s your question?

Joe: My name is Joe. Podcasting and screenwriting are clearly two different mediums. What is something you have learned about yourself either as a podcast host or a guest that is something you would not have learned during the creative process?

Craig: That ties into what we were saying earlier about educating is education. I know that I have had to think a little bit more clearly about some of the things that I do believe philosophically. It’s different than what is an inspiration in a moment when you sit back and you go, okay, there’s artsy-fartsy Craig, but then there’s also outline Craig who’s got a job to do and understands it needs to fit within a certain amount of time.

It needs to achieve certain things plot-wise. There has to be surprises and all these nuts and bolts things. I think doing this and being forced to talk about those things helps me codify and make some of those a little bit clearer in my own head. It’s like forced organization.

John: I would say I’m always riveted to being a segue man. I’m always moving on to the next thing. What that really is, is it’s recognition of being very present in the moment, but also always knowing where you’re headed and where you need to get to next. That’s also writing. That’s also what a scene needs to do. You need to set a sense like we are fully in this moment, and yet we’re going to the next thing.

Just the way a scene can just die and people are just sitting there and nothing’s happening, you don’t feel any momentum, you’ve got to keep the momentum there while still letting it be present for the characters who are in that scene.

Craig: That makes sense.

John: Great question. Thank you so much.

Craig: Thank you.

[applause]

Silas: Hi, there. Big fan. Sorry, I’ll be a little bit farther. My name is Silas. You guys did a podcast episode relatively recently, I don’t know how well in advance you record these, about short films. I’m a sci-fi writer. I’m a sci-fi fantasy writer, genre writer.

I sometimes have a really hard time balancing the line between being super obnoxious and explaining everything way too heavily, the whole Star Wars scroll thing, whatever, and people asking me, why are they doing that, what is happening. That’s a huge problem to have in short films where everything is super compact, needs to be super tight. My question is, how do you balance that line between exposition and mystery?

Craig: Sure. I’ll turn that over to you guys because we all deal with this one. Everybody needs to know things. Also, you don’t want them to know things.

John: You don’t want to spend a lot of time explaining things.

Craig: What are some of the things– I think about in animation, again, $1 million a page, what are some of the tricks you use?

Pamela: The story in Frozen is there were all these backstories and all these minutes they had to get rid of, and it changed into the line, was she born with it or was it a curse? That’s an interesting question. It gets answered, and now we know everything about why we’re here.

Trying to find a way to take all of that that you think they need to know, you think they need to know it, they don’t. They don’t think that. They want to know, what do I care about? I don’t care about the backstory until I know why they’re not in love, why they hate each other. Then I can start to learn all the worlds and what your currency is and why it’s a patriarchy or whatever it is that the sci-fi world wants you to know. That stuff is interesting for you to know what your tone is, but we don’t need to know all of it to care about your characters.

John: Silas, thank you so much.

Craig: Thank you, Silas.

[applause]

John: Hello.

Brenna Kwan: Hello. My name is Brenna Kwan. My question is, what is your opinion on, let’s say, sizzle wheels or proof of concepts from, let’s say, emerging filmmakers that’s created out of AI? Do you consider that as a red flag or–

John: Hey, it’s a good question.

Craig: I think everybody in here is going to give an answer, but let’s see what you say.

John: Let’s talk about sizzle reels in general. Sizzle reels, we’re cutting together stuff from other movies that give a sense of what this thing feels like. For directors who are putting together a project, sometimes it’s a really helpful way of showing what it is that you’re trying to do and sort of do this thing.

Where I get a little bit frustrated is when you have to do a sizzle reel for just a script that you’re not trying to direct, just to get someone to read the script, that’s really annoying. I really wish we could stop doing that because I think it’s a waste of time because you’re here to be a writer, not to be a sizzle reel maker.

Whether you’re cutting out of other films or using AI or whatever to do it, I just don’t think it’s a good practice for us to be in. So many strong opinions on use of AI and what things feel like, okay, well, it’s a person using that thing to do the job they would otherwise be doing to do.

I don’t have problems if a visual effects artist is using some new tool that uses some of the stuff in there. I just don’t want it to replace their job. I do feel like using a sizzle reel to do that kind of stuff, it’s just putting more of that stuff out there in the world, and I’m really frustrated with it.

Craig: I think it’s an indication maybe of lack of commitment, or even, dare I say, laziness. Remember, a sizzle reel is already taking what other people have done and putting it together to sort of go, it’s kind of like what these people all worked really hard to do, which is already sort of a cheat code, which is fine. Then to say, and also I just asked the slop machine to barf out somebody with seven fingers to help me, it’s indicative to me that maybe the heart isn’t in it.

John: I guess here’s my concern. If I see your thing, I feel like, “Oh, this was done with AI,” and then I’m going to read your script, it’s like, “Well, did she really write it?” I don’t think it reflects well on you.

Craig: Where does it stop? [chuckles]

John: That’s why I’m going to say no. I’m going to say it’s a no for me.

Craig: I’m going to say no. What do you guys think? Big pro, oh, Pam Ribon loves AI. Is that the headline here? [laughter]

Pamela: No. Just trying to get controversial. People listening, I am not nodding or excited. No, AI makes me feel scared. When I watch it, I get uncomfortable. What is it called? Sora? My husband will be like, “Look at this.” I’m like, “That’s a cyborg. We must run. We must run away from it.” I would worry that when you think this is going to explain how it feels, you have to worry about how it feels when it’s not real.

Craig: You might not feel the way you want it to feel. Is it budgetary? What is the reason behind why one would do this?

Pamela: I’m trying to recreate my pilot into a web comic or a Webtoon and to perhaps advertise for it. I was playing around with Sora, so that’s where the question stemmed from.

John: I can understand what the instinct is behind that, but I would say look for what Webtoons are doing, like the things you actually like that are Webtoons that you enjoy. Also, I would say, don’t turn your script into a Webtoon just because that’s a thing you can do, unless you really love that as a medium.

I feel like, so often, it’s like, “Oh, I couldn’t sell it as a movie, but we’re going to do it as a dramatic podcast.” It’s like, “Well, do you actually love dramatic podcasts, or are you just spinning your wheels because you want to do something?”

Craig: I hope that the robots don’t listen to this later and come after us. There’s that whole thing where you will be the one that they’re like, “Well, you live.” [laughter] Right.

John: Thank you so much for your question.

Brenna: Thank you.

John: Thank you for coming out tonight.

[applause]

All right. Let’s do two more questions. These next two, and then we’ll be done for tonight.

Craig: Two more.

Jordan: Hey, guys, I’m Jordan. My question is a little specific, but maybe we can make it a little more universal. Say you’ve got a great adult animated pilot that you’re taking out and you’ve gotten a little bit of feedback. You’re leaning towards serialized, but everybody’s telling you, “Well, we want episodic.” Do you go and do you rejig it?

You could go either way with it, really, but you’re leaning towards serialized. Do you go and adjust for the market, or do you write the thing that you want to write and just wait for it to be the right time for it?

John: I think you know your answer, but let me make sure that the rest of the crowd understands this. You have an opportunity. People like the thing you’ve written. You could make it serialized where you’re supposed to watch all the episodes in order, or episodic where you can watch them in any order whatsoever. You’re going to have a sense to me. You’re going to have a sense of what is more fun and interesting for you to write. Do that.

If the buyer says, “No, we really want it this other way,” and you get a chance to do it, do that. I think you have to both be steadfast and adaptable in this business. You have to be true to what’s important to you, but also flexible to actually get things done and get things made. We both know filmmakers who just, they made a great film, and then they were so steadfast about, like, “I’m not going to compromise a damn thing for my second film.” They’re not making films anymore.

Craig: There is no second film. I believe that there will be another thing. I never like to think that whatever I’m working on now is it. A little bit like the don’t put all your eggs in one basket.

Anthony: That’s a really great thing to remember. I think the business will go on without any one individual. [laughter] That’s really horrible to say.

John: Even if Ryan Murphy were no longer making all his things, we would still have a television business.

Anthony: Economically, it would take a hit.

John: It would take a hit, but yes.

Anthony: Sometimes people have to remember that. What can you do that feels like it’s not absolute betrayal to the center of what it is you’re writing that you can collaborate on?

Pamela: Also, why not try? Then if it doesn’t work, you can say, “This is why I really wanted it this other way.” I can see why you asked me to do this because The Simpsons or whatever, they’re all episodic, but BoJack worked for a reason. Once you try the way that they think they want or they need, maybe they need it. That’s the mandate. Try for the job that you can get, always.

John: Good luck. We’ll see you at a future AFF.

Craig: All right. Bring us home.

John: Bring us home. Who are you and what is your question?

Emmett Farnsworth Guzman: My name is Emmett Farnsworth Guzman.

John: Emmett Farnsworth Guzman is a fantastic name.

Emmett: Thank you. My parents gave it to me.

Craig: I think you invented television. Did you invent television?

Emmett: Actually, that’s my great-great-uncle.

Craig: Is it, really?

Emmett: He’s Philo T. Farnsworth.

Craig: That’s actually your great-great-uncle?

Emmett: Yes.

Craig: That’s amazing.

Pamela: What is happening? [laughter]

John: This man’s great-great-uncle invented television.

Emmett: They cast him right here.

Pamela: Really?

Craig: Philo T. Farnsworth.

Pamela: Why is he here? [laughs]

Craig: Are you hired?

Emmett: I feel seen right now.

John: You feel seen. That’s when we get back to relationships. You’re leveling, which is validations, feeling seen, feeling heard. We’re giving it to you right now. All right.

Emmett: I wasn’t expecting that.

Craig: What’s your question? Really, you’re [unintelligible 00:56:51].

Emmett: They really did. The thing is I’ve listened to an inordinate amount of you guys over the past year, starting from the beginning. Incredible. You have very terse words for people selling books. Why did you decide to write this?

John: Thank God someone finally asked the question.

Pamela: Someone got the question.

Craig: I’ve been waiting all night. I can’t believe none of these terse words. It was an open goal. None of you took the shot. It’s a great question.

Emmett: I have to.

Craig: John, can you explain why we have the book?

John: I would say our listenership kept saying, like, “Hey, you should make a book,” or, “You should put a book of your transcripts out there.” We literally did the math. What if we just did a book of our transcripts? It was impossible. It was bigger than this entire room to do our transcripts. It was like, “Well, what if we could do a best-of?” It’s the synthesized version.

The thing that happens to me and Craig constantly is like, “Hey, I have a question about blah, blah, blah.” It’s like, “Okay, we talked about this on episode, I don’t know, 346.” You can send somebody and say, “Oh, go back and listen to episode 346.” If I could just give you a book, this is what we’ve talked about.

Our Natalie and Luke, who have the galleys here, you can track them down and look over their shoulder to see what’s in the book. The book is very specifically synthesized versions of what things we talked about over the course of the podcast. It’s not like how to write a screenplay. There’s one chapter–

Craig: Called How to Write a Screenplay.

John: How to write a screenplay, literally. [laughter] Which is mostly about Finding Nemo, really. People love it. The book consists of distilled versions of all the things we’ve talked about, stuff about relationships and stuff like that. It’s not like, here are the plot points, and here’s all the Syd Field stuff. It’s not that kind of book. It’s a book about screenwriting and not how to write a screenplay.

Craig: John and his team, of course, did all the work. You guys know I suck. What I think is great about it is, and I don’t mind sounding like a jerk, we know what we’re doing. This is our jobs. This is our careers, our lives. We have spent decades working in this business as professional writers. We are still doing it to this day.

Sometimes we have hits, sometimes we have losses, but we are still here. After breaking into the business in the mid-90s, we’re still here. We must know something. That is actually a perspective that generally doesn’t exist in the 4,000 other books. They’re written by people that don’t.

John: I’ll also say that the stuff we don’t know, every other chapter is an interview with one of our guests who’s come on the show. It is Christopher Nolan, or it’s Greta’s coming in. We’re talking to everybody, Aline and everybody else, about their experiences that are very specific and that are not our experiences.

Craig: They’re not just us.

John: We don’t have the hubris to say if we actually know everything. We know a lot, but we also have guests who know-

Craig: We know so much.

John: -a ton of stuff that we don’t know, which has been great, too. It’s honestly so people don’t– give people a book. Do a book. Thank you for the question. Also, this is a time, a show of hands, who has pre-ordered the Scriptnotes book? [laughter] [crosstalk] I had to be informed.

Craig: Thank you. Thank you for that.

John: Thank you so much.

Craig: Thank you, everyone.

John: Thank you for the softball there. Thank you very much, Mr. Farnsworth.

Craig: It’s like he was sent by the publishing company.

John: Oh my God. That is our show for this week. If you want to hear this as a podcast, you can subscribe to Scriptnotes, and you’ll get this in the feed on Tuesday. Scriptnotes is produced by Drew Marquardt, who’s over there. He’s a superstar hero.

[applause]

This show will be edited by Matthew Chilelli.

Craig: As always.

John: God bless you, Matthew Chilelli, for making us sound better and smarter than we are. Our intro and outro, he also wrote all our music. He’s so fantastic. Thank you to Emily Locke and everyone at the Austin Film Festival. Who here is a Scriptnotes premium subscriber? Oh my God.

Craig: Thank you.

John: Thank you so much. You guys don’t realize it, but you keep the lights on at Scriptnotes. You pay for all the stuff.

Craig: Thank you.

John: Craig, where can they sign up to become a premium subscriber?

Craig: You can sign up to become one at scriptnotes.net, where you can get all the back episodes and bonus segments like the one we did not do tonight.

John: The Q&A will be the bonus segment when you listen to it, so no one else has to hear those great questions there at the end. This was our 11th live show.

Craig: Not a bad one.

John: Not a bad one.

Craig: Not a bad one.

John: Really good. I’ve loved it. You’re a great crowd. Thank you so much. Have a great night.

Craig: Thank you, guys, so much. What a great crowd. Thank you guys for coming out.

[Bonus Segment]

John: Pamela Ribon, you have been volunteering and he said yes to help us out with this game we’d like to play. This is another chance to win a galley copy of the Scriptnotes book. Here’s how this is going to work. We need to find two Scriptnotes super fans who will compete to see who gets the copy of the book. It’s already signed. It’s a galley copy. There’s only 20 of these in the world. We need to find that person.

Here’s the strategy for how we’re going to find super fans in the room. It’s also a chance to stretch a little bit because that’s a thing that people do. In this room, please stand up if you have listened to 10 or more episodes of Scriptnotes. That’s a lot of listeners. That’s fantastic.

If you have listened to more than 100, stay standing. Otherwise, sit down. 100 episodes. These are people who say they have listened to 100 episodes.

Craig: That’s a lot.

John: Who is wearing a Scriptnotes T-shirt? If you’re not wearing a Scriptnotes T-shirt, sit down.

Pamela: Wow. They all fall down. [crosstalk]

John: I see three.

Craig: Three, two. Two, three?

John: I see three. One, two, three.

Craig: Three. One, two, three.

John: All right. You guys stay standing. We have some tiebreaker questions that we figured out.

Craig: You’re one of the three.

John: You’re one of the three. Some of these, they start easy, but they get really hard. Of just the three of you, please, no one contribute. Just the three of you. Raise your hand if you believe that Craig’s least favorite condiment is mustard. Craig’s least favorite condiment is mustard. Raise your hand if you believe that is true. That Craig’s– three, two, one. You all got it right. What is your least favorite condiment?

Pamela: Mayonnaise.

Craig: If you want to call mayonnaise a condiment, it’s really more of a disgusting substance.

John: All right. On Scriptnotes’ three-page challenge, we often refer to a Stuart special. Raise your hand if you believe a Stuart special refers to starting with a flash forward. I would actually say it is a flash forward. You’re definitely in. What’s your name? Natalie is in. Now it’s between the two of you to see who’s the other– who’s going to face her off in the final thing. Just the two of you.

All right. Raise your hand if you think there has been a deep dive episode on Unforgiven. A deep dive episode on Unforgiven. You say yes. She doesn’t know. There has been one. It’s one we rarely refer to. All right. Coming up, Natalie, coming up.

Craig: It’s like The Price is Right.

Pamela: Oh my gosh.

John: All right. What is your name?

Luke: My name’s Luke.

John: Luke, hi.

Craig: Luke. Hi, Luke. Natalie, come on up.

John: Natalie, come on over here.

Craig: Natalie’s got the cool S Scriptnotes shirt, by the way, which is my favorite.

John: It’s Scriptnotes University and Scriptnotes Cool S.

Craig: Scriptnotes University and Scriptnotes Cool S.

John: Very good. Now, Drew is going to give you some signs. The sign will either say John or Craig. Pamela’s going to read.

Pamela: These are fancy.

John: Yes, fancy. You can tell we’ve thought a lot about this.

Pamela: Oh my gosh. We’ll tell you what they say in the back.

[laughs]

John: All right. We have some things that Craig and I have said over the years on the podcast. Craig and I don’t know what these are. Drew compiled all these. We have no idea. Pamela Ribon is going to read these things, so you have to decide, did John say it or did Craig say it?

Craig: This will be exciting.

John: This will be exciting for us. We can’t help you. We don’t know.

Craig: We don’t know. We can’t help.

John: All right. Pamela, the floor is yours.

Pamela: Thank you. I’m going to do my best to not let you know who said it by always sounding with, I have slight umbrage. Number one, “I don’t like it when you hold me accountable for the things I say and do.”

[laughter]

Craig: Oh, so fast.

John: Natalie says Craig. Luke says Craig.

Pamela: It is Craig.

Craig: Because I don’t like that.

John: Drew is keeping a score. The winner gets the book. This is important. All right.

Pamela: “No more being stupid. That’s dumb.”

[laughter]

John: Both Natalie and Luke say it’s Craig.

Pamela: It is Craig.

Craig: It’s dumb.

Pamela: Number three, “No undamaged woman owns a bar in Tibet.”

[laughter]

Craig: Such a good observation.

John: We have Craig. Luke says Craig. Natalie says Craig. What is the answer?

Pamela: It is John.

John: It is me. I suspect that’s from Raiders of the Lost Ark.

Craig: It must be from Raiders of the Lost Ark. Yes. Marion.

Pamela: I bet you sounded sweeter when you said it. Number four, “You can’t sink the same boat twice.”

John: Luke and Natalie, what do you think? Who said that? Why don’t you say that and I’ll say it to see which sounds better.

Craig: “You can’t sink the same boat twice.”

John: “You can’t sink the same boat twice.”

Craig: I think it’s John.

Pamela: It is John. That was hard because you could tell that was helpful.

Craig: Yes, exactly. [crosstalk]

Pamela: Which really are the same. They’re the same.

Craig: Also, I think you can sink the same boat twice.

Pamela: You sure can.

Craig: Of course you can. Get it back up.

Pamela: Bring it back up.

John: Bring up of the Titanic. Sink the Titanic again.

Pamela: That’s right. Do it twice.

Craig: Sink it again.

Pamela: It pops back up. We saw that in the Titanic. Number five, “I’m not one to toot my own horn, but I think that I could kill you.”

[laughter]

John: Both Luke and Natalie say Craig. What’s the answer?

Pamela: It is Craig. If John said it, there would be a lot of call-ins. There’d be a lot of emails.

Craig: I think I could do it.

Pamela: How’s John doing? Number six, “Acknowledgement is hype.”

Craig: Ooh, that’s deep.

John: Both Natalie and Luke are saying John. What is the answer?

Pamela: It is John.

Craig: John, yes.

Pamela: I’m going to do this since they’re so– [crosstalk]. It is a little–

Craig: [unintelligible 01:07:26] [crosstalk]

Pamela: It depends on if he’s complaining. The apology, it’s just hype.

John: I wonder if that was probably in reference to sexy Craig, wasn’t it?

Pamela: God. All right. I guess I could try sexy Craig for number seven.

Sexy Craig: Did someone say my name?

Pamela: “It’s a cross between a play and a yuck.”

[laughter]

Craig: Ooh, a split.

John: Oh, a split.

Pamela: Oh, we have a split.

John: Luke says John. Natalie says Craig. What is the answer?

Pamela: It is Craig.

Craig: I am shocked. Well done, Natalie. You know me better than I know me.

Pamela: Oh boy, sexy Craig. Number eight, “Anything can be a sex toy if you’re imaginative enough.” [laughter] Do you two know which one of you said it?

John: I have no idea.

Craig: I have a suspicion.

[laughter]

John: All right. I’ll try it out. “Anything can be a sex toy if you’re imaginative enough.”

Pamela: That’s your Play-Doh pitch.

Craig: “Anything can be a sex toy if you’re imaginative enough.” Oh, another split.

Pamela: Another split.

John: Luke says John. Natalie says Craig.

Craig: I think it’s John.

Pamela: It’s John.

Craig: It’s John.

John: Oh, I said it.

[applause]

Craig: Only because I think there are some limitations on sex toys. Just a couple.

Pamela: Talk to John.

Craig: Not many, just a couple.

John: Narrow-minded Craig.

Pamela: That’s right.

John: Once again.

Craig: It’s too little.

Pamela: Number nine, “If you want to see a twink navigate a chocolate river, you’re probably not going to the multiplex.’ [laughter] I just had to do that one in my voice.

Craig: God, I hope that was me. I really do.

John: Oh, a split. Natalie says John. Luke says Craig. I don’t know. What is the answer?

Pamela: It’s John.

John: It’s me.

Craig: All right. I’m jealous. I wish I had said that.

John: Was that Jen? Was that it?

Pamela: Do you want a score check? We’re about to do 10.

John: Yes, a score check. Where are we at?

Drew: Natalie’s up by one.

John: Natalie’s up by one. All right. That’s the only score that matters.

Craig: I wonder if anyone else is up by one. Okay, go on.

Pamela: Number 10, [laughter] “I’ve never done a Latvian escape room.” It’s hard to say.

Craig: A Latvian escape room.

Pamela: A Latvian escape room.

John: Latvian escape room.

Craig: Latvian.

Pamela: Latvian like the Latvian.

John: We both try it. I’ve never done a Latvian escape room.

Craig: I’ve never done a Latvian escape room.

Pamela: That’s tough.

John: Two Craigs.

Craig: I think you’re both wrong because-

Pamela: Two Craigs.

Craig: -I have done a Latvian escape room.

Pamela: That’s right. Two Craigs make it John.

John: John is the answer, right?

Craig: Yes.

Pamela: All right.

Craig: Oh, yes, I have. If I’m in Latvia, what else am I going to do? Latvia as a whole is an escape room.

Pamela: Do you think you were just saying it as a segue? You’re like, “I’ve never done a Latvian escape room.” Speaking of escape rooms, for the room that we’re in now. Number 11. We have five more.

John: Five more. Right.

Craig: Oh, God.

Pamela: “We’re not hiring people because of the size of their bones.”

[laughter]

John: Both say Craig. What is the answer?

Pamela: It’s Craig.

John: It’s Craig, yes.

Craig: It’s true.

Pamela: Number 12, “I couldn’t have been wronger.”

Craig: We’ve got a split here.

John: A split. Natalie says John. Luke says Craig.

Pamela: It’s Craig.

John: Ooh. Are we tied up? Drew, are we tied up?

Drew: Tied up.

John: We’re tied up. All right.

Craig: Damn.

Pamela: This is the World Series. Number 13, “Maybe try laughing at something funny.”

[laughter]

Craig: What does that mean? What was the context of that?

John: All right. Natalie says Craig, but Luke says John. Who said it?

Pamela: It’s John.

John: I said it? Oh, that was mean.

Craig: I knew it. I don’t think you were saying it to me.

John: Luke, you’re ahead. All right. Up by one.

Pamela: He’s up by one?

Craig: Luke is up by one.

Pamela: All right.

Craig: Luke is up by one.

Pamela: We have two left.

Craig: We have two left. This is actually a big deal.

Pamela: Number 14, “It takes maybe five seconds to fully maul a child.”

[laughter]

John: Both say Craig. Is it Craig?

Pamela: Yes. He said it back there.

John: This is it. If Luke gets this wrong and Natalie gets it right, we’re tied. Otherwise, Luke’s won this game.

Craig: Let me just say, strategically, whatever he says, say the opposite. You can’t win otherwise. You’ve got to go for this.

Pamela: Shout out to Katie P. for these quotes. Number 15, “I’m excited for your socks.”

John: Ooh. We’ll try to give them a shot. “I’m excited for your socks.”

Craig: “I’m excited for your socks.”

John: Very similar, actually.

Craig: Luke, you’ve got to throw it out there. You’ve got to throw it down.

John: Three, two, one, show. Oh, so you say John. Luke says John. Natalie says Craig. What is the answer?

Pamela: It’s John.

Craig: It’s John.

John: Oh, the big winner is Luke.

[applause]

Craig: Way to go, Luke.

John: Congratulations. All right. Stay right here. All right.

Craig: You did great, though. I consider you my great supporter. Thank you.

John: Natalie, I’m going to give you a book, too.

[cheering]

Craig: I’m so glad.

John: That was really fun. Thank you, Pamela, for doing it.

Craig: Great job.

John: Well done.

Pamela: Do it anytime. I love impersonating you both.

John: Killed it.

Craig: Five seconds, John. Five seconds to maul a child. Accurate.

John: I’ve learned that I’m meaner sometimes than I thought I was, which is fine.

Craig: Yes, you are.

Links:

  • Pamela Ribon and Anthony Sparks
  • Austin Film Festival
  • Preorder the Scriptnotes Book!
  • Our Moneyball episode
  • Enter the Relationship Matrix by Chris Csont
  • Bring It On toothbrush scene
  • STOMP
  • Writer Emergency Pack
  • Get a Scriptnotes T-shirt!
  • Check out the Inneresting Newsletter
  • Become a Scriptnotes Premium member, or gift a subscription (now with fewer emails!)
  • Subscribe to Scriptnotes on YouTube
  • Scriptnotes on Instagram
  • John August on Bluesky and Instagram
  • Outro by Matthew Chilelli (send us yours!)
  • Scriptnotes is produced by Drew Marquardt and edited by Matthew Chilelli.

Email us at ask@johnaugust.com

You can download the episode here.

Scriptnotes, Episode 707: After the Hunt, Transcript

November 3, 2025 Scriptnotes Transcript

The original post for this episode can be found here.

John August: Hello and welcome. My name is John August and you are listening to Scriptnotes, it’s a podcast about screenwriting and things that are interesting to screenwriters.

I love talking to screenwriters about their experience getting their first movies made because it’s the difference between writing a script and actually creating a movie. Last year, we had Justin Kuritzkes on to talk about his experience with Challengers and Queer, back-to-back with Director Luca Guadagnino. Today, we’re here talking with Nora Garrett, the first-time writer of Guadagnino’s current After the Hunt. Welcome, Nora.

Nora Garrett: Hi, thanks for having me.

John: I’m so excited to talk to you because I think one of the reasons why I love this as an example is we have so many listeners who are working on their scripts, they’re aspiring writers, they’ve written some scripts but they’ve never gotten a thing made. And so that transition point between like, these are all the words I have on paper and this is a movie that’s actually existing in theaters, just talking through that process gives people a sense of the journey. Craig and I could talk about it and our experiences, but that’s not what happens in 2025 and you have just gone through this process.

Nora: Yes, that is true.

[laughter]

John: I’m sure there were moments that were great and moments that were surprising and fantastic and also terrifying.

Nora: Yes. Oh, I mean, there were so many moments of abject terror that I felt like I was just in a complete state of disassociation watching myself go through it and be like, be cool, relax. [laughs]

John: Yes.

Nora: Yes, it happened really fast. It’s interesting to be on the back end of it now looking back.

John: Cool. I want to talk about your journey as a writer, sort of getting up to this point, getting this in the hands of a director who actually made your movie with Julia Roberts starring. Because we have the actual script in front of us, I want to talk a little bit about the words on the page and your experience writing those words, but then seeing like, oh, those actual actors have to do these things and that whole process.

Nora: Yes.

John: And revisions, probably the most revisions you can also imagine. I saw from the cover page, you went to double white, so you went all the way through the colors.

Nora: Yes, we sure did.

[laughter]

John: We’ll also answer some listener questions. Then in our bonus segment for premium members, I want to talk about day jobs, because until very recently, you had a day job doing other things, and I want to talk about what your experience has been trying to have an identity as the person who is a screenwriter and a filmmaker and an actor, but also the day job of it all.

Nora: Of course.

John: Cool. Well, let’s get into it. You and I are both from Colorado, so.

Nora: Oh, my gosh. Really?

John: Yes. I saw that you were born in New York. Were you raised in Evergreen?

Nora: Yes, I was raised in Evergreen. Wow, where are you from?

John: Boulder, Colorado.

Nora: Oh, my gosh, amazing. Wow.

John: Talk to us about Colorado, because my experience of Colorado was that I had no idea how lucky I was growing up there. Then you go back and like, “Oh, my God, this place is so pretty.”

Nora: That was exactly my experience. Exactly. We moved from New York when I was four, but I was adamant that I was a city girl to the point where I have vivid memories of touring the houses that we eventually lived in Evergreen. I was telling the real estate agent, I was like, “I’m a city girl, I don’t belong here.” [laughs]

John: You’re four. Yes.

Nora: I’m four. I’m four. I think my father at that point was like, that’s when he was like, “I don’t understand. I don’t know what to do with this girl.” It wasn’t until I left Colorado to go to NYU and then came back from the city that I realized that this is such a gorgeous, bucolic place to live. My experience of Colorado, and I think it’s still true, is that it’s a pretty big artistic town in the middle of the country.

John: I grew up in Boulder. We had the Shakespeare Festival. For not being at a hub, we had a lot of cultural things.

Nora: Exactly. I was dancing at first at Colorado Ballet and then I transitioned to acting and I went to Denver School of the Arts, which is a local magnet arts high school. I think that there was a lot of local theaters and a lot of local theater that I was able to be involved in alongside the Thespian Convention and the Shakespeare Festival. I always felt like Colorado had a liberal and an artistic bent to it, even despite being in a landlocked state. [laughs]

John: Can you talk to me briefly about dancing? Because you’re the only person I know who’s gone from dancing to screenwriting. Dancing, my perception of it, especially ballet, is that it’s all about reducing differences between things, being flawless, and practicing thing until it’s absolutely perfect. Then I don’t want to say you’re interchangeable with other people, but there’s just no flaws to be seen. Did you love it? Why did you stop dancing? What got you out of dancing?

Nora: Sure. That’s a very astute observation. I think that I loved ballet. I loved it so much because of the regimentation that you’re talking about, I think. I think I was someone who really responded well to structure and that’s been true throughout my entire life. I responded really well to six days a week, very rigorous, two to three hours a day of ballet. I responded to the same rigor when I went to school and took that really seriously.

I think having parameters was important to me, but it’s a ruthless job. Ultimately, I stopped because I had sort of a prescient notion at the age of 13 that I was like, I’m never going to be a prima ballerina. The best I can hope for is corps de ballet. Just because my body simply didn’t do the things that they needed. I didn’t have clean lines. I don’t have hyper-extended elbows or knees or really good turnout. What I did get from that experience was a certain amount of discipline, regimentation, but also it was very performative. There was a lot of opportunity for performance at Colorado Ballet because it’s not like ABT where it’s super competitive to get in the nutcracker.

John: I shared your love of just being, for me it was like testing and standardized testing in school. I loved actually just being right and knowing that I finished the thing and I was done and I’ve gotten the correct answer. I loved that there was a correct answer. While I was always good at writing, and I loved being praised for writing, there was something just really comforting and nice about just like, oh, no, I got like 100% on the test, and that was really easy.

So much of what we’re doing now, there is no right answer and there’s no perfect word for this thing. There’s no perfect scene. You’re always dealing with the imperfection of it all. Going from ballet, which you’re right or you’re not right to acting, there’s no right performance. What was the transition there?

Nora: Yes. Again, really great questions. I feel like the ballet of it all, I mean it’s really just containers, right? I don’t know. I got familiarized with Anne Bogart’s work in college, but she’s a director who talks a lot about the container of something and specifically the container of archetypes. I think with ballet, there’s a really rigid container of steps, but there’s still room within those steps for expression.

A lot of ballerinas take acting lessons because you don’t have words, so you really have to give an ontological experience of emotion to the viewer. I think that with acting, I thought there was a right way, for sure. I was not able to enter into going from pretty much regimented dance to regimented acting classes. I was not able to segment my brain and be like, okay, there were steps that I learned and there were perfect ways to do things in this medium and there’s not in this medium. I thought those two things were transferable to my own detriment, really.

John: To some degree, in musical theater where there’s a track, and to learn a track, you have to drop in that thing, I have such respect for the swings who can come in and just go through any track and a thing, but it really is not directly comparable, the experience.

Nora: No.

John: We have a lot of guests on the show who’ve gone through improv classes. They always were recommending improv classes. The thing about that is there’s no time to stop and make the perfect choice. You just have to continue with what you’re doing.

Nora: Absolutely, yes. I think for acting, it’s something where you can really get into a point where I’ve certainly been there, where you just belabor the thing. I think that it took me a long time to realize that sometimes, especially for someone who can be really cerebral like me, it’s better to just get yourself into a different track and just go with the first instinct as opposed to trying to find the perfect choice.

John: We had Greta Gerwig on the podcast a while back and she was talking about coming out of the mumblecore tradition and how she loved and respected a lot of it, but she got really frustrated that there wasn’t a text to anchor yourself back down to. You felt like as an actor, it was just too terrifying to have nothing underneath your feet to get back down to and that she felt like she could actually push much further once there was a text underneath there.

I hear some of what you’re saying there. It sounds like ballet, yes, you’re getting every step right, but then you’re finding ways to express yourself within that. As an actor, if you have scripted lines, you know those scripted lines, you’re making choices about that rather than every other moment.

Nora: Right. I think that the best-case scenario as an actor is you get to the point where you know the lines so well that everything feels spontaneous within the structure of the memorization and within the structure of having the understanding of your character. Everybody gets to that point differently, which I think was something that took me a really long time to understand. Some people really need to focus on every single line and the motivation behind every single line in order to trick their brain into being spontaneous, and some people can’t do that. They have to just veer straight into the spontaneity. I think I was very convinced that I was like, no, there’s one method and I must find it. [laughs]

John: Was that the reason for going to NYU was to find that method, to find that answer?

Nora: I knew I always wanted to be back in New York, which based on my four-year-old dictums, I think.

John: It’s Eloise returning [unintelligible 00:09:52] and stopping that, yes.

Nora: Exactly. I read all the Eloise books. I read Eloise in Russia. She went to Russia.

John: Of course, she did. Yes.

Nora: Of course, she did. There’s hotels in Russia. I was very adamant that I was like, I’ve got to be back in the city. I belong in the city enough with like, I don’t know if you felt this when you left Colorado, but I met people who didn’t know what elk were.

John: Oh, yes, of course. Yes, absolutely. They’re not necessarily like, no, they’re these giant wild creatures who doesn’t wander through your backyard. Yes.

Nora: Yes, exactly. They’re bigger than deer. I was like, “Oh, yes, everybody knows what an elk looks like.” My first friends at NYU were like, “No, you know what an elk looks like. We do not.” I think I was in high school looking back on it. I think that I was told I was a talented performer. I don’t think that I was going off of a feeling of like, wow, I love this and I’m obsessed with this and I just want to follow this. I think I was chasing the feeling of being good and of being someone who was talented and had that sort of external validation. It wasn’t until I got to NYU that I was like, “Oh, I really love this.”

John: Can we talk about NYU? Because I visited New York in college and was like, “Oh, this is overwhelming.” Specifically, the NYU area is just an overwhelming place. My daughter did a summer program there in high school. She’s a city kid. We lived in LA and Paris. She’s like, “I can’t handle the street harassment. Just the daily life of it all was tough.” What was your experience coming from Colorado to a place like NYU?

Nora: My family lived in New York for a really long time, like my extended family. I would go back and visit. I think what I was super attracted to was the autonomy of it. I’ve always been someone who was like–

John: Yes, developing quickly.

Nora: Yes, very quickly. I think that I felt like a person who was an adult faster than other people, which not true, but I felt that way. I’ve always been really attracted to the notion of being there and you can get yourself wherever you want to go and you’re not reliant on anybody else to get you there. There’s a certain amount of autonomy in that respect that I wanted to have. I was desperate to get out of home. Not because of anything bad, but just because I was like, I want to be alone.

John: Also, you’re like the protagonist in your own story and you recognize that you have to leave home in order to have your great adventure.

Nora: Yes, exactly. Yes.

John: When did you read your first script? You probably read some plays in high school, but when did you get the first sense of that when it wasn’t like another classic play that you’re reading?

Nora: That’s a good question. I have to think about that. I read a ton of plays for a very long time, but also read a lot of books. That was my first introduction to writing was just being a huge nerd and reading a ton. I remember very distinctly learning how to use a parenthetical for the first time as a very young kid. [laughs] I think that it must have been in college because of– I want to say that I’ve read a script before this, but we did have a class I think my sophomore year of college, where it was acting for film within the container of, you’re at a school for acting for the stage.

We read The Talented Mr. Ripley. The goal of the class was to learn a certain filming technique as opposed to a theatrical one. We read The Talented Mr. Ripley seven times, I think, back-to-back. That was probably my first experience. I remember being really struck by how little was on the page compared to plays.

John: Let’s talk about that, because classically when I look at plays right now, there’s sometimes a lot of scene descriptions where it’s setting up to look at the thing, but then there’s pages and pages and pages of dialogue. What you’re saying, it’s like The Talented Mr. Ripley, and this is for an acting exercise, so it’s really about how are you able to communicate to when the camera’s enclosed, what is the edges of your frame? What was not there on the page that you were expecting to be there?

Nora: More, I think. [laughs] I just thought–

John: You thought it would be much more scripted in terms of every little movement, every step?

Nora: Yes. I thought it would be– it’s not only about stage direction, because I think also, I was very obsessed with the canonical plays. I loved Edward Albee. I loved Tennessee Williams. Tennessee Williams stage directions are verbose. It is just like a stack of stage directions or very stacked, rather, I don’t know. I think that going to reading The Talented Mr. Ripley, I was like, “Oh, this is so much about the actor’s performance.” I think that that varies script to script, because now I’ve read so many. In that one particularly, I was like, oh, wow, it really is about who you are as an actor bringing yourself to this, because it’s not the same type of roadmap, I think.

John: Also, you look at the differences between a stage play and a screen play. A screen play only needs to be filmed once. It only needs to be actually acted once. Those scenes, they’re going to do it once and they’re going to be done. You can experiment with that versus stage play. In theory, this is a set of instructions for creating basically the same experience again and again and again, no matter who’s in those tracks and who’s in those roles.

Nora: Exactly.

John: That’s an inherent difference between those two things. You’re reading The Talented Mr. Ripley. You start probably reading some other things. When did you start acting in people’s films? Were you acting in shorts while you were at NYU? What was the first time that you were on a set with a camera aimed at you?

Nora: Sure. I did start doing short films in school. I think they really started kicking off probably around the summer after my junior year because NYU and specifically Stella Adler, where I was studying, they have a very rigid– It’s so funny to look back on it now because the stakes felt so high, but they basically were like, “You’re not allowed to act anywhere beyond the confines of this school until your junior year,” which not everybody subscribed to. Again, I was the rule follower and someone who was very serious about this education. I felt like, okay, I’m not ready. I’m a nascent creature. Then I have to wait until one teacher tells me I can go off.

Yes, it was probably around summer of junior year. I have done so many short films, some of which have seen the light of day and some of which have not. I think that I’d probably be terrified watching them back now. I think it all started because I was dating a guy who was very into film. I think his friends were also very into film. They were these people who were involved in the acting school, but they knew they wanted to go to Hollywood. They knew that they wanted to be screenwriters. They had a–

John: They’re the worst. They’re terrible people.

Nora: I believe the term is film bros now. If I’d had that verbiage, I would have used it back then. They’re still my friends to this day, but they had an encyclopedic knowledge of film. I grew up watching Legally Blonde, Charlie’s Angels, Liar Liar, and The Big Green on repeat. I was like, those are my four. That’s what I’ve got.
[laughter]

John: [unintelligible 00:17:01] right.

Nora: Yes, exactly. They had seen everything. I felt like, “Oh, those are the people who make this,” but they were also very committed to making short films. Because I was dating this guy, and I was an actor, I got into that web.

John: We have a lot of listeners who are making short films. What advice could you give to them about having been in a bunch of short films and student short films and posts? What are good experiences? What are bad experiences? What are things you wish those directors had a better sense of when they cast you in something?

Nora: Great question. I feel like I would say really use short films as a sense of experimentation. I think I took everything very, very seriously. I felt like I never knew what short film was going to catapult me to fame. [laughs] That’s what I felt like. Honestly, I was like, “Someone’s going to see this, and then I’m going to be famous at the age of 20.” It’s just not that. You’re making stuff with your friends, and it’s really, truly a time to learn and expand and make really bold choices that may or may not work.

I think that when no one’s watching, it’s really the opportunity to veer into that and steer into that scope. I think as an actor, it’s a great time to learn about your own process and what works for you and watching yourself back, and trying to figure out the dissonance between, oh, this is what I meant to do, and this is what’s actually on the screen. I think everyone in the short film process probably feels that way. Yes, that’s what I would say.

John: I’m friends with some folks who’ve been making a bunch of short films using folks who are very good at social media. These are folks who film themselves constantly. I think that’s one of the things that’s going to be fascinating to watch 10 years from now is how many of those people graduate towards doing bigger, longer, expanded things. These are people who get a chance to iterate all the time.

I think what you’re describing is that they can just constantly experiment, but they’re not used to the sense of an ongoing narrative. They’re used to a 90 seconds, but if you have to tell a story in 5 minutes or 10 minutes, it’s just a different beast. Or if you need to work with a larger, more experienced crew, it’s not just you setting up lights yourself. It’s a different thing. I’ll be fascinated to see how that works.

I’d love to just push a little bit more on, you’re an actor who’s agreed to be in a short film. What are your expectations going in? What do the directors and people who are helping out to make the film need to know about? How do they make it a good experience for an actor?

Nora: Sure. Okay. I feel like some of my best experiences were when you knew that– It’s a couple of things. I think you want to feel like, especially with short films where it’s sort of run and gun and everybody’s doing a lot of different jobs, I think you want to feel like your voice is being heard and you’re being valued as a creative entity within the film.

I think it’s important that you know that you’re going to be taken care of throughout all the process, throughout all the extenuating processes after you film. I think it’s important to, and again, this might not be important to everybody, but I think it’s important that you know what cameras you’re shooting on and you know that those cameras are going to look really good, that even if this isn’t a perfect product, you’re going to have something that’s really good for your reel and that it is going to be edited and that there is going to be a final product that you can eventually see.

John: That it actually goes to you and it disappear.

Nora: Exactly. That’s happened to me before. I’ve shot shorts that never seen the light of day. I think it’s much more holistic when you understand that this is going to be something that you can watch because everybody needs it at that point. It’s not the same thing where you’re like, okay, well, I committed my time and energy for free. The promise of that is I’m going to have something to look at at the end of the day. I think it’s a matter of short films are so stressful. I do think there’s a certain way that you have to protect your cast from that stress.

John: Some of these short films you were making with friends, which is great and that’s a safer experience, but were there things where you just auditioned, like you saw, noticed, and you went and auditioned for, you submitted for, and you were just working with strangers?

Nora: Yes.

John: What is that like as a person? You probably didn’t have reps or you had no one on your team at that point. How are you making sure that this is going to be a good situation that you’re actually safe?

Nora: [laughs]

John: For example, would you only meet in a public place or would you go to a place-

Nora: Oh, sure.

John: -where there’s an apartment? I would just love some good advice.

Nora: Yes, of course. I mean–

John: I’m not thinking just for our actors who are listening, but for filmmakers, make sure people feel good about the experience.

Nora: I think something looking back on my experience, especially immediately post-collegiate when I was auditioning a lot for these– I was on Backstage, I was on Actors Access. I did a big cattle casting call for Columbia Film School, which was actually one of the best. I did the same thing for USC when I moved out here. Those were some of the best experiences because you’re meeting film students who are doing their MFA and you’re auditioning in Columbia and you know that it’s the container of the college, so you know that all these people are very committed to doing something and making something and have the resources.

I don’t know if I ever auditioned in someone’s living room. I’m sure I have, but I think for Friends, I think there’s a certain desperation of a young actor that really, at least for me, I would have done anything. You know what I’m saying? I think I would have gone anywhere, seen anybody, done anything, because I was like, again, I was just like, put me in pictures kind of thing. I was just like, “I’ve got it.” I think also there’s a lot of stuff told to young actors that is really hard and harmful. I don’t know if you watched The Rehearsal.

John: Yes.

Nora: Yes, but I was watching it this most recent season and it just broke my heart, because I was like, “These people just want the opportunity to be on HBO and it feels like, God, I really recognized myself in that.” I was like, “I would have done anything too. I would have made out with someone for 12 hours on a soundstage.” Because there’s a certain amount of you just really– you’re told for so long that this business is impossible and you’re told that you have to do whatever it takes and you’re told that no one’s going to make it. Part of doing whatever it takes is sometimes, I think, hopefully now it’s different, but compromising what you believe to be artistic integrity or just the integrity of self. Yes.

John: As an actor, you’re constantly waiting for someone else to pick you to do a thing. As a writer, you can just write your own thing. When did you start writing in screenplay form? When did that start off?

Nora: I always wrote since I can remember, and started with prose and really bad poetry. Got into slam poetry in high school, which is embarrassing, but I feel like I should say it.
[laughter]

John: If you say it enough, the shame will just go away. This is a part of your identity.

Nora: Exactly. That’s what I’m hoping. That’s what I’m hoping. I’m hoping that if I say it-

John: Slam poet.

Nora: -then everyone’s like, then I–

John: Former slam poet, Nora Garrett. Yes.
[laughter]

Nora: If you only knew. Yes. I got really deep into it.

John: Oh, yes. We’ll find it. We’ll find it. [crosstalk]

Nora: Oh, yes. It’s so embarrassing, but I loved it. I think the web series was the thing when I was graduating college. Everybody was making a web series. I was acting in a web series, and so I wrote a couple of web series. They were just bad. They were bad. I think it was also the Girls’ renaissance.

John: Oh yes, of course.

Nora: Everything was that feeling of like, oh, I am also an almost 20-something living in New York. I can also write about my life in this way. It’s only now that I look back and realize how detailed and nuanced and brilliant Lena Dunham is and how you can’t repeat that. That’s what we were all trying to do. Yes.

John: You’re writing those things and you’re writing stuff that you would shoot immediately after. At least there was a feedback loop. You could say like, oh, this is what was on the page. This is what it’s actually like to try to make the thing. This is what it looks like in editing. You do get a lot of experience that way.

Nora: Yes. My last semester at NYU, I did Stone Street, which is the film and television studio. That was really like we would write things and then shoot them in the studios. They looked horrible. They were just awful. I would love to think that I had the cognition at the time to have any creative feedback about the artistic process, but I think I was really just caught up in how starkly insane it feels to see yourself on film for the first time. I think it’s also when you make something and the distance between you making something and what actual film looks like is so vast that you’re just like, oh, this isn’t even that art form.

John: No. [chuckles]

Nora: This is literally like a camcorder. Yes.

John: Yes, absolutely. It’s an image on a screen, but that’s really about as close as we got there.

Nora: Right, exactly. You’re like, oh, these are pixels arranged in a way that they’re supposed to be arranged, but this is not film. Yes.

John: When did you write your first full-length feature-y script?

Nora: The truth is, is that After the Hunt was my first full-length feature.

John: That’s great.

Nora: Yes, that is the truth. [laughs]

John: Talk to us about the idea of it and going into it. I guess we should say that I saw it a couple weeks ago, but most of our listeners probably won’t have seen the movie yet. How do you describe it? Maybe describe what your initial intention was for it, and if it’s different than the final thing, tell us what changed.

Nora: It all started with the character of Alma, which is played by Julia Roberts in the film. Again, at the time, was not played by Julia Roberts. I thought, wouldn’t it be interesting if there was a character who had, at the core of their identity, a secret? This secret is something where I thought it could go one of two ways. I think I was also very obsessed with the notion of success and successful people, probably because I had been outside of the realm of success for so long, and I was trying to gamify the system in a way, but I was obsessed with the price of it, and not necessarily the external price, but the internal price.

I had just listened to a podcast called Liars, I think, a part of This American Life. Basically, the upshot of that was that statistically, people who are more successful in our patriarchal capitalistic society are people who are better at lying to themselves. That can ensure more success. I thought, A, I felt validated by that, but B, I was like, wow, what a fascinating notion? Again, what’s the cost of that? Because I felt like there had to be some sort of internal cost.

Alma was this character who I thought, okay, if she has this secret about something that happened in her childhood, but at an age where you’re coming online enough to understand what you’ve done, how do you metabolize that into your adult life and specifically when you start having adult relationships? Then how do you think about yourself when you start reaching for professional success? Does this lie, does this ability to obfuscate and compartmentalize really help, or is there an eventual consequence?

John: From that initial instinct, were you trying to feel like, well, what is the perfect vessel or vehicle to explore this thing? The Julia Roberts character is a professor of ethical philosophy at Yale. She’s uniquely obsessed and caught up with these questions of what is truth, how do you live an ethical life? She has this secret at the start of it. Was that baked into the idea initially?

Nora: Yes, it was baked into the idea initially. I think when I was thinking about the first logline, I did think about the professor and student relationship. Having her be a professor of epistemological thought or ethics was my tongue-in-cheek way of being like, oh, she literally teaches something that she has not fully synthesized within herself. It was the expansion of that initial feeling of the dissonance of someone who lies to themselves about their own experience.

John: Yes, so very classically, the people who study psychology or psychiatry often have their own stuff that they’re wrestling with and digging through. It makes sense to put it there. One of the things that strikes me so great about that setup is Craig and I have talked for years about how it feels like there’s a paucity of female characters who have to make ethical choices in movies.

The thing we always do for [unintelligible 00:30:09] is about Episode 483, Philosophy for Screenwriters. We were talking through that and that we don’t see it. In this case, your creative character was just so exactly wrestling with that situation. Tara was another example of that. When you have this central question that you want to explore, did you know what the genre was going to be? Because I’m not even quite sure what genre to put your movie in, the finished movie. What do you consider your movie?

Nora: Yes. I think the genre that it started out initially was the psychological thriller. Because I think that, to me, the question at the heart of a lot of psychological thrillers is what is real? I think that is something where that question, when you put it internal as opposed to external, when you’re like sort of what is real that I think, what is true, what is false, what is true, and what is false in what’s happening right now, that to me is the source of that almost psychosis or that feeling of just like, what can I trust? Then I think Luca was more interested in how do we create something that feels more like an adult drama?

John: Adult drama or melodrama, which is a word that has a negative connotation right now, but we used to make melodramas. Is there something delightful about the drama is the drama in a way?

Nora: Yes, of course. Yes. I think he was really interested in making the theatricality of a psychological thriller into something that felt a little bit more drawing room, a little bit more lived in. Yes.

John: Let’s talk about Alma and all the balls you have her juggling. She is a professor seeking tenure at Yale. There’s that whole issue. She has a graduate student, a PhD candidate student who is daughter-like to her, but also obsessed with her and is potentially a problem. She has a marriage which is okay but has some weird dynamics and strains in it. Her husband is a psychiatrist.

She has a best friend who’s also in the department and they have a complicated relationship, an Andrew Garfield character. She has some medical condition, which I’m not quite sure what it is weighing on her. She has a secret. She has a secret from before. She has a comfortable life, but a lot of things pull in her in different directions. In other stories, one of those might be sort of enough, but there’s a lot happening there. Then these aspects conspire to make things even more complicated for her. How much of that did you know before you started putting pen to paper?

Nora: I think something I should say is that I started writing this screenplay as part of a class that I was part of a group of female writers who we’ve all share our work with each other. One of them had written a rom-com and she told us all that she was like, I took this really great class. The whole thrust of it was that you’re just going to finish your first draft in 12 weeks. Basically, the idea–

John: That’s a classic sign-up kind of thing.

Nora: Yes, exactly.

John: A boot camp, like you’re just doing it.

Nora: 100%. You’re just doing it. I thought, okay, I’ll do that. That could be a great way to sort of put a container around something that can be a little bit nebulous sometimes, which is the work ethic.

John: [unintelligible 00:33:26] containers I’ve heard so far.
[laughter]

Nora: Yes, containers. [laughs] I do. I love organizing. I used to be a professional organizer myself. [laughs]

John: Oh, okay, great. Yes. We’ll get to that in the bonus segment.

Nora: Yes, exactly. A lot of these decisions, and we talked about this, you touched on it a little bit earlier, but a lot of the decisions had to be made really quickly. Part of that was really beneficial because you just got out of your own way. I think that it’s hard to look back and narrativize how much I knew prior. I would say that the triad of Julia Roberts’s character, Ayo Edebiri’s character, and Andrew Garfield’s character, who as Alma, Maggie, and Hank, that was something that I knew going in.

I think I wanted something physical, something that somebody could point to to see if this was someone who was very calm, cool, and collected on the outside. I wanted there to be something physical that you could point to that showed the degradation, the falling apart, or just maybe in more obvious terms that whatever you deny will show up in the body somehow, kind of.

I think also I was interested in substance use. I don’t know, just sort of that as somebody who was able to be high functioning across all levels while potentially being degrading to their body. I think especially as a woman and especially as a female character, women’s bodies are such where women are often made to take such good care of them. I was interested if you can take the Brad Pitt character where he’s constantly eating in half of his films and give that trait to a woman, which is, I realize, a horrible thing to make a female actress do. [chuckles] That notion of just hunger and a lack of concern for the body because you live such a life of the mind.

John: Great. Talk to us about the 12 weeks. Over the course of 12 weeks, did you finish the script? Did you get through it?

Nora: I did because, again, I love rules. I did finish it. Again, it was just really bad. I think all of it was a really good exercise in learning that just, I think for a really long time, I let great be the enemy of good. I was made to push past that and just realize if you get something down, it’s not the final iteration by any means.

John: Let’s talk about that, getting it from it’s finished to actually to good. What was the process there? Who were you showing it to? What were the drafts you were doing? What was that like?

Nora: I had shared a lot of my writing with a couple of really close friends, some of whom belonged to the cabal of people that I went to college with. I put the first draft away for a little while. Part of that was just necessity. I was in a period of time where I was changing jobs and I was applying for a bunch of different jobs and I was very financially stressed.

Part of that was by necessity and then part of it became just trying to not think about it for a little bit and return with a fresh perspective. Then I re-outlined, re-broke the second draft, re-wrote it, and then started sharing it. I started sharing it with a group of just really close trusted friends who had read a lot of my prose before and who I knew gave really good feedback and whose writing I also really respected. Then collected those notes, did another draft and another draft and then did a reading of it with my actor friends.

John: Yes, I was going to ask. Knowing actors, it felt like it would be a great way to hear some stuff and see what’s working there. What did you learn in that reading?

Nora: I don’t know if you have this, but there’s an enormous sense of terror and shame when people start reading your words out loud. [laughs]

John: Absolutely. All the things you’d never notice were like, oh, my God, that actually isn’t the text. There’s a missing word there. People are trying to make this line work.

Nora: Yes, 100%. Or I’m like, “God, I use that word so much, like container.” I’m like, “Oh, my God, what have I done? Why did I get obsessed with the word fruition? That makes no sense.” It’s, yes. After getting over the initial hot flush of feeling like this is so demoralizing and debasing, after that, I tried really hard to just step back.

I think it’s really important when anybody does a stage reading or a reading, it’s like I had actors who, it was during the actor’s strike, and so I got a lot of my friends who were actually really quite good, but they had no other job. It was amazing to just be like, wow, these are really good actors. If they are struggling with this moment or if this doesn’t sound right coming out of their mouth, then I know something needs to change.

John: Yes, if they can’t sell it, it probably is the line.

Nora: Exactly.

John: It’s not the person reading the line. Through this process, you got to a better draft. When did you get the draft in the hands of Imagine who ended up taking it? What was that process of I have this thing and now somebody needs to read this to try to make this?

Nora: It’s so funny looking back on that version of myself because I feel like–

John: Looking back, what, two years?

Nora: Yes, [laughs] looking back. It’s not long ago.

John: The younger me.

Nora: The younger me. No, but I think it’s– I’ve had for so long, I’ve been really timid and skittish about asking for favors, asking for help. The curse of going to an arts high school, the blessing and the curse is that I went to an arts high school and then I went to NYU. All of my friends, for the most part, there’s obviously attrition, but a lot of my friends are in the arts. You have this feeling of seeing a lot of people who you went to school with and you started in the same place and then suddenly you’re seeing people who are much, much, much more successful than you.

Again, that gap is one that can be difficult to close, but also, it’s that awkward thing of I don’t want to ask my friend to help me. I don’t know what, I really don’t know what changed. I didn’t have an agent. I didn’t have a manager. I had this script, and two of my close friends who have written a lot more than me in terms of screenplays, they were like, “I think this is good. I think you have something. You should start submitting it to competitions.”

I submitted it to the BlueCat Screenplay Competition and I got excoriated. The feedback was so bad. [laughs] I remember reading it and I was just like, “Whoa, okay.” [laughs] I think they issued some boilerplate statement that’s like, “We suggest you reapply or suggest you take this writer’s notes.” I don’t think he gave me notes. I think he was just like, “This is bad.”

John: You’re on the website now.

Nora: [laughs] Yes, exactly. Well, to me, it was a wonderful indication of like, wow, somebody can hate your work, hate it, and other people can really like it. There’s something crazy making in that because you’re like, “What is good?” I can’t say what’s good.

John: It’s a person who wants to get the checkmark of success. Like, no, you want an objective measure, and that there’s just no objective measure of any of it.

Nora: Exactly. It is that thing where it’s like okay, obviously, when the film comes out, we’ll see. There’s a big feeling of just like, “Okay, you hate my writing, and this person doesn’t hate my writing.” I think that I read the feedback, and I had that moment where you’re like, “Oh, I’m horrible. Everything I do is bad.” Then I thought, I don’t know, my friends like this, and I trust them, so I’ll take the cogent notes, the salient notes, and then I’ll just keep going. Again, I think that that’s an older version of myself would have completely capitulated and just been like, “You’re right, blue cat.”
[laughter]

John: “I’m embarrassed to tell this to you. I’m sorry for wasting your time.”

Nora: Yes, exactly. I asked a friend of mine who was representative. I asked him if he knew of anybody who might want to represent me, and he set me up with my now manager, Sidney Blank. I remember our first meeting really clearly because I was at my grandmother’s house in New York. I was helping my grandmother through knee surgery at the time and also working for Meta. I took off of Meta for an hour and a half to have this meeting.

I truly thought this script would be a sample. I truly thought because it’s the exact opposite of what everybody was telling me they wanted and what everybody was telling me to write, which is that it’s really talky. A lot of conversations, there’s a lot of $5 words, it’s very cerebral at times, there’s no major set pieces. I was pretty certain I was like, this would just be a really good sample, and I’ll be able to get in rooms, hopefully.

John: Getting a room on a succession-like show would be a dream with a script like this.

Nora: That was the dream, 100%. I was like, “Hopefully, I get a manager, and then hopefully, I start working in rooms.” Sydney was the first person who said, “I really think we can make this into a movie.” That was, I think, December of 2023, I think.

John: Yes, so recent.

Nora: It’s so recent or maybe two. I don’t know.

John: What are years?

Nora: What are years? It was very recent, though. Then that next year, which I think it– yes, God, I think it was 2023. Alan Mandelbaum at Imagine had just made Fair Play. Sydney knew Alan and thought that he would respond to the script and thought that it was in the lane of what he was looking to do or had done and was interested in. Incredibly lucky for me that she was right.

John: That’s great. Imagine read the script. Did they meet with you before they bought the script? What was the process?

Nora: I remember that meeting really well. Yes, they met with me, and I met with them, really. It’s also so funny going from auditioning and trying to get agents in this town and the stark difference between having meetings in people’s offices. I had a meeting once in like an ante room of CAA once, not even in an office with a door at 6:00 AM. It was so bad. Then suddenly going into meetings in boardrooms and I was like, “Oh, this is a very different process. This is a very different feeling of courtship.” Whereas before I’d been in the position of me trying to really sell myself.

It was a meeting with Alan and Karen Lundgren and Joyce Choi. Immediately, Alan just had really smart questions and a lot of incisive ideas and passion for the piece, which again, I was still at a point where I was just like, I can’t believe any of this is happening.

John: My first paid job was also Imagine. I went through there. Colorado and Imagine. Time shifted or something.

Nora: I have a podcast called Schmitschmoats.

John: It’s so good. It’s rising up the charts quickly. At this point, they’ve purchased your script, they’ve optioned your script, or what it will be?

Nora: No. It was just a meeting of– Then Sydney wanted me to have the experience of other people who were interested in meeting with him. I had a couple of meetings and then Imagine was pretty persistent about wanting to do it, so we decided to go with him.

John: That’s great. Did you do drafts for Imagine before you went off to find a director or did you go straight to Luca? What happened?

Nora: No. I think this was so atypical across so many different lines. It’s hard to say that because obviously, I don’t have another experience to draw from. I think that Luca is a director who moves very quickly. Once he signs on to something, his confidence is such where it was lovely to borrow from it. He’s like, “This is getting made. We’re going to get it made within the timeframe that I have.”

The process of it getting to Luca was one of those ones where it feels like a very charmed Hollywood experience where I didn’t even know that production companies had reps, but Imagine’s repped by CAA. Alan had come to the meeting with a list of directors that he thought would be right for the piece. Luca’s name was right up there at the top. They asked me after we decided to work together to hone in and find a smaller list of directors. I made a list of four people who I thought, okay, if these people even see this in their inbox, it’ll be the best day of my life, and Luca was in that little grouping.

We sent the script to his agent who happens to be married to Julia Roberts’s agent. Imagine really wanted things to be we keep it in the director sphere first, get a director attached, and then we go out to cast. The way it happened because of obviously their proximity, it got slipped to Julia Roberts. Then she actually came on first because initially, Luca had a scheduling gap. No, he had a film that was going. Then that film, for whatever reason, didn’t happen. Then he came on.

John: That’s great. Talk to us about your first meeting with Luca, your first meeting with Julia, for which she was involved in those early decisions. I just remember it is just so strange talking to a big director about this thing. You feel lucky to be in the room, but also, you’re trying to like, how am I going to both make the movie that I want to make and the movie that you clearly want to make?

Nora: I think it’s really difficult being a first-time screenwriter in some ways because– especially coming from the acting world and just having zero understanding of your positionality or power in these rooms. I think I felt like, “Wow.” I feel so lucky to be here across the board. Again, it all happened so fast that it’s hard to look back and be like, “Oh, what was–” It just felt like such a no-brainer choice. This is happening now. I think it would have been insane for me to, at that point, be like, “Luca, no thank you.” That’s crazy.

I think that the first meeting with Luca was actually so wild because I used to work at the Chateau Marmont. I don’t want to spoil things, but I used to work there, and he was staying there at the time. Our first meeting was there, and my old manager was there. I remember walking past the hostess stand where I used to stand until 1:00 AM every night, and he was there. I said it was like a meeting with Luca Guadagnino and he was like, “What?” This is a crazy experience of just being like, this is a place that I’ve been so many times in such a different capacity, and now I’m meeting with this person here.

I love Luca as a director, and I’d seen almost all of his films except for A Bigger Splash. I almost put off the meeting because I was like, I have to see A Bigger Splash. Then, of course, the one film he mentions in the meeting was A Bigger Splash.
[laughter]

Nora: I was like, “Oh, no, I knew it.” I think I was just trying to remind myself that I could speak cogently about this material because I had written it even in the face of someone who I was like, you’re just such a behemoth and someone who I really admire and respect and I have no idea.

John: It should be obvious, but you forget like, “Oh, that’s right.” I’ve actually been in all of the sets that are in this. I’ve been inside this entire movie for years, and so I really can describe everything that’s in here and why everything is in here. I might be defensive, but I actually do understand it. It’s not like if this script had plunked down in your lap and you put your name on it and went into that meeting, you wouldn’t have the ability to talk about what’s really inside it. You’re the only person who’s already seen the movie, which is- A hard thing to remember.

Sometimes as you’re talking to directors for the first time or actors, you forget like, “Oh, that’s right.” They’ve never been inside this. They’re just trying to find their way in. You had this meeting where they’re immediately like, okay, these are some big things that we’re going to approach and change and fix. What was the process of working with them?

Nora: I think Luca immediately felt like the ending did not work. I think that he was really interested in teasing out more of the thorny dynamics between the characters and the thorny social dynamics and really exploring the socio-political world in which these characters were in. I think that something I was scared of when all this was initially happening is I’d heard so many horror stories of people writing scripts and then studios getting involved and everything getting denuded and the teeth being filed down and everything becoming so commercialized.

I think something that was really special about having Luca at the helm of this film was that he has such a backlog of reputation and wonderful work that he’s really able to silo his creative experience and make it into what he wants it to be. I think he was really interested in punching out those themes and making things a little bit more gray, a lot less certain.

John: Entering the movies, if it’s worth the psychological thriller, there’d be probably a clean answer to how somehow these things sort out. My experience with watching the movies, I went to a 10:00 AM screening in Culver City with just myself, and I didn’t have anybody to talk about it with afterwards.
Fortunately, I grabbed a sandwich nearby, and there were three women who’d just seen the movie, too, and I heard them talking, so I could join their conversation as– Let’s talk about these three things because it very much is one of those movies where you want to have some discussion about what really happened there. For a movie about ethical philosophy, there are various shades of gray in terms of what people are doing and what the outcomes really are and how people got to the places they got to.

Nora: Yes.

John: Can we take a look at some pages from the script? This is how we’re starting the movie. This is the initial scenes as they’re meeting all the different characters. I want to just talk through some of your descriptions of who these people are. Emma Hoff, the Jill Robbins character, 51, beginning a typical day. We don’t give any specific more information with her at this point, but we’re going to see a lot of specific behavior from her. Frederick Mendelson, her husband. Can you read the description for him?

Nora: Sure. Frederick Mendelson, Alma’s husband, 53, handsome but fatigued, graying all over.

John: Great. I get it. Next, we have Hank Gibson. We meet him in that parking lot.

Nora: Hank Gibson, 40, Alma’s colleague, handsome and smart and scrupulous with both, having worked his way up the ladder at Yale from a lower-class background.

John: That last clause, having worked his way up, that’s not evidence that we can’t see that on screen, but we’re going to see it in his behavior later on. That’s just the cheating that we embrace in a screenplay.

Nora: I take advantage of that. [chuckles]

John: Next, we’re meeting Maggie Resnick.

Nora: Maggie Resnick, mid-to-late twenties, who bears a striking resemblance to Alma, if not an appearance, then an energy.

John: Cast in the movie, played by Iowa Deberry. Her being Black becomes an issue in the movie, but did you know it at this point? When you first wrote the screenplay, you didn’t know that.

Nora: No, I didn’t know it at the point. When I initially wrote the script, there wasn’t any specific notion of race.

John: Next, we have Patricia Engler.

Nora: Forties, a professor, emeritus of philosophy, the type of woman who is always losing her keys, her wallet, her badge.

John: Who is eating from a to-go container of soup and texting at the same time. It’s delightful. Again, it’s the specificity that I’m loving about these things. Then we’re meeting her almost in class. We’re going through a montage of scenes before we get to the opening title card for After the Hunt. We’re meeting Fabiola, not a housekeeper. She’s hired to help. She’s to do everything in person for the family. She would be the nanny if they had kids, but they don’t have kids. We’ll try to put this first three pages up, so people can download them.
There’s a lot of behavior, a lot of setting of worlds and establishing this two-professor family that makes a good income and has a very specific kind of New Haven’s apartment life, which was not in New Haven at all, right? It was actually in London?

Nora: It was actually in London, yes. Something that Luca is very rigorous about research. He has a research that he’s used on, I think, a lot of his films and used again on this one. He is very adamant about verisimilitude. He is a wonderful set designer who makes-

John: The sets are incredible. They feel so incredibly, again, specific. They’re always jammed. All these people are hoarders until you get to one point very late in the movie where we’re at a place that is incredibly spare and spartan.

Nora: Yes, exactly. That was all Stefano. It was to the point where it felt like immersive theater, where it’s like you’re walking-

John: You’re asleep no more.

Nora: Exactly. You’re walking around the sets and you’re opening drawers and you’re like, God, there’s actually what you would have in your drunk drawer if you were a philosophy professor in New Haven in 2019. This was what it would look like. He was very meticulous about that. I think that that’s a wonderful thing for actors to have, for sure. A lot of this initial scenes was something that Luca wanted as just a way to set up entering into these characters’ lives prior to feeling like, oh, we’re just at the fulcrum point.

John: Talk to us about the language, because we’re catching glimpses of them in class, and they’re just talking in what’s almost– It’s legalese or medicalese. It’s almost incomprehensible to what they’re saying to each other because it’s all just signifiers bouncing back and forth. To what degree did you know that as you were writing the first draft? How much of this came in later on? What was that process?

Nora: My cousin is getting her master’s in philosophy at Stanford. I really plumbed her experience and also literally some emails that she’s gotten from professors about announcing talks. The language that’s in the script is a very sanded-down version of the opacity that exists in that world. It is legalese. It’s jargon. Something when I was taking philosophy classes ad hoc, postgraduate, I was like, wow, this is really interesting because to me philosophy is something that is really a question of how to live and how to live morally and how to live well and how to live with integrity, which is a question that everybody has to answer. The barrier of entry is so high with these texts because they are so verbose.

There’s a part of me that loves the idea of you can say in a whole book what another person can say in five sentences, but there’s another part of me that feels like, “Come on, guys, just say the thing.” I did not have Alma teaching a lot in the initial draft. That was something where Luca really thought if this is someone who’s supposed to be at the top of her field, we should see her doing what she does. That required a crash course in philosophy beyond what I had already learned myself.

John: It also creates structural issues because you need to find where do those scenes go in a natural way that’s advancing the actual overall plot that we believe that she’s teaching this class differently because of the situations that are happening just before this and are happening after this.

Nora: Exactly, yes. How can we use those scenes that otherwise would be cut and dried boilerplate teaching scenes to heighten tension or add drama?

John: The tension reaches the boiling point. This is from page 80 of the script. This is a confrontation between Maggie and Alma just outside of a library at Yale. It starts with Alma coming up to Maggie who’s talking with their partner Alex and pulling her aside and becomes an actual full confrontation. It’s a centerpiece scene. Was this always in the script? Is that the thing that came along in the process?

Nora: Portions of it were always in the script, certainly towards the end of the scene. Some of the language in it is actor improv that was gleaned from rehearsals.

John: Oh, great.

Nora: Yes.

John: Talk to us about the rehearsal process.

Nora: Talk about being completely thrust into a world in which you’re just trying to have to tamp down your terror the entire time. Julia Roberts hosted us at her home for rehearsals.

John: Is it in New York City?

Nora: No, San Francisco. She’s lovely and so warm and disarmingly so. We had one Zoom prior where she gave notes on the script, so it at least wasn’t like a complete cold meeting. Luca basically ran it so that obviously, the actors were all very busy, so we had to stagger who was involved in rehearsals. Sadly, the only person who could not come to rehearsals was Michael Stuhlbarg because he was on Broadway acting. It started with just Julia and Andrew Garfield, Luca and I, and then slowly but surely, then Io came, and then it was Chloe, and then it was all of us.

John: How far in advance of production was this? Months?

Nora: Gosh. Not terribly far. I would say May, and then Luca went into prep in June. We started shooting early July, I think.

John: I’d love to read through some of this back half here because you’re at the point in the movie where people can more clearly state the themes and what their actual thing is. It’s not couched in specific language, or it could be a little more direct. If you put me at page 82, I’m nowhere near the actor. Anyway, Deborah is. I just want to read through some stuff here. She says, “I don’t feel comfortable having this conversation with you anymore.”

Nora: “Not everything in life is supposed to be comfortable, Maggie. Not everything is supposed to be a lukewarm bath for you to sink into until you fall asleep and drown.”

John: “There are no rewards in death for spending your life suffering as much as possible.”

Nora: “You’ve constructed a life that hides your accidental privilege, your neediness, your desperate desire to impress. At least I have the self-respect to be obvious about what I want. You, you lie all the time, living in an apartment 10 times cheaper than what you can afford, dating a person you have nothing in common with because you think their identity makes you interesting, fawning over me because you think my affection offers you credibility, another adoptive mother to replace your own insufferable one. It’s all a lie. It’s no wonder everyone thinks you lied about Hank, too.”

John: Again, it’s a moment where you actually can pull off all the niceties and things. You’re also answering an audience question. I was watching like, “Wait, if she’s rich, why is she living in that crappy apartment?” It’s rewarding the audience for that question you asked. You’re actually answering that question that was never audibly asked before. It’s like, “Why are you doing this thing?” Getting to express these, you’re not entitled to comfort, is an aspect too.

It’s almost like the audience is not entitled to a nice, tidy ending. It’s setting up, hopefully, the right invitation for the audience about what they’re going to get to because the question of what exactly happened, what all this history was and stuff like that, they’re going to be answered but not answered to the degree that here’s the clear, it’s not the sixth sense. It’s not Citizen Kane Rosebud. It’s not that kind of clear answer.

Nora: Initially, it was. Certainly, the drafts that were circulated was very much like you got the answer. I think you’re absolutely right that it is a sense of a metatextual working that Luca wanted to create, which is that these characters are saying these things to each other and the audience is having the experience that the characters might be having.

John: Well, congratulations on the script and on the movie.

Nora: Thank you. Thank you so much.

John: We have some listener questions that I think might be appropriate for you to help us answer.

Nora: Great.

John: Anita writes, “When is it appropriate to dramatize a scene versus having a character merely telling a story to other characters? How long can you go with a character who’s talking through something that happened to them without actually having to break in to show that?” A script I just turned in, I ran into that situation too. It’s like, okay, what’s too long where I don’t actually need to show the thing? I don’t know.

To me, it’s just, it’s the instinct. I’m like, is the audience going to be okay sitting in a place for a long time without doing it? Like Big Fish, there are some things where we do flashback and show the story, but there’s other times where you just tell the story. If it can be a half a page of dialogue and we feel like we could hold on to the after that long, I think my instinct is to stay. What’s your instinct?

Nora: I think it’s a difficult question. It was something that I thought about a lot with the script because there’s that feeling of how long can you hide the shark in Jaws. You know what I’m saying? How long can you make it? There’s going to be some sense of dissatisfaction, I think, when you reveal something, even if eventually, you move towards satisfaction in the end. There’s a sense of what the audience creates or what they bring to it is always going to be a little bit more juicy than finding out the real thing. I think I try to hold for as long as possible without being annoying.

John: The other thing to keep in mind is that if we have a character telling something, there’s still ambiguity. Is that character being honest? Is it not? Once you show something, the audience is basically saying, oh, it’s trusting the filmmaker. It’s showing the actual real truth. That’s not the case. You’re going to have to do a little more work to undo that dialogue.

Nora: Absolutely. Yes. I think it’s about rewarding people’s faith while creating as much tension as possible.

John: Let’s take one last question here from Nami. “I recently rewatched the first episode of The Twilight Zone, and it was building tension and releasing it and building and releasing over and over again. I was wondering if you could talk about how to build tension, if you have examples of movies or scenes, as well as how you tackle it or think about it.”

Tension and suspense comes when you feel like a thing is about to happen, but you don’t know when it’s going to happen. It’s the buildup to a sneeze. It’s the buildup to anything that triggers your mechanisms like, “Oh God, something bad is going to happen.” It can be as simple as the Hitchcock, there’s a bomb underneath the table, and you see the countdown underneath the table, or a longer-term thing where you’re just like, oh, there’s this sense of dread.

I think one of the issues that we’re living with as a society right now is that sense that there’s an overall tension. You feel like things could break at any moment. You’re just not quite sure when it’s going to happen or what it’s going to look like. In movies, you have to be always thinking about it as the writer. Are you adding to it? Are you dissipating from it? If you’re cutting into something that is unrelated, is that unrelated cut going to increase the tension because we’re still worried about what happened before, or is it dissipating, letting the tension out of a moment?

Your movie has a lot of tension in this building up to just mysteries that we’re trying to figure out. A lot of checkouts guns are being loaded in your movie. Any more instincts about tension and suspense?

Nora: First of all, I love The Twilight Zone. Again, I think it’s a delicate dance between feeling like what you have to pay off versus what is it perhaps more interesting to leave hanging, or what can you get away with not paying off and still satisfying your audience or still giving them a sense of agency as opposed to befuddlement.

John: All right. It’s come time for our One Cool Things. Do you have a One Cool Thing to share with our audience?

Nora: Sure. I’ve been really interested in Substack, recently. I think that it’s a great little corner of the internet when there’s a lot of scary corners of the internet. I also think it’s really great to just read Flash prose without deep commitment and also get inspiration. Jessica Tofino is a writer who runs a great Substack called Flesh World. It’s a lot about the beauty space. I’m really obsessed with optimization culture, especially as it pertains to physical appearance. There’s another man who writes, I think his title is Good Reader, Bad Grades. He writes flash fiction. I just started reading him, and I love it. It’s really tightly told and very evocative.

John: That’s great. A couple of things to respond to on there. Flash fiction as a concept can be great. These are little short bits. It’s almost the textual equivalent of TikToks where it’s just like, here’s the idea, you’re in and you’re out. Daniel Wallace, who wrote A Big Fish, has a book of flash fiction that is just delightful. I respond to it the same way. It’s like, just one more, just one more, just one more.

Substack is so fascinating, too, because there’s so many really good writers on Substack. Anytime you mention Substack, people are like, “But what about the Nazis?” It’s a tough thing where you can be frustrated by the business model in the space and that it’s corporatizing a bunch of independent voices, and yet also the time when publishing and media is struggling so much that people are actually being able to make a living writing is something worth celebrating.

Nora: See, this is a great example of how siloed the internet could be because I didn’t even know about any of that. [laughs]

John: Oh, that’s great. Literally, I’ll post something on Blue Sky about this post that I really liked, and the first comment will be like, “Oh, too bad. It’s on that Nazi platform.” I’m like, “Oh my God.”

Nora: Oh God. No, everything is ruined. I have to think of a new, cool thing.

John: The scolding that happens in popular culture is true, and that’s also part of your movie, too. Your movie is building off of reactions to me, too, but just the general sense of there’s no good way to be a decent person in the world.

Nora: No. I think it’s also a certain sense of, God, there’s nothing that seems particularly clean in this world now. Everything is touched, everything is tainted in some way, and it’s like how do you enjoy what is available to enjoy?
[laughter]

John: Well, not directly related, but my one cool thing is The Good One podcast by Jesse David Fox. We had Jesse on the show many months ago talking through comedy. The Good One podcast, it’s scripted, but it’s talking with- funny people about how they do their work. One episode I really liked recently was Ben DeLaCreme’s episode.

Nora: I love Ben DeLaCreme.

John: He’s an incredible drag performer who also does a Christmas show but talking through the behind-the-scenes of RuPaul’s Drag Race but also the bigger issues of being a creator who also has to think about producing and the overall notions of what is this space that we’re trying to do. You’re always grappling with, well, what is drag anymore? If drag isn’t dirty, is it still drag? All these issues. Just a great, smart conversation. One of many good episodes of The Good One podcast.

That is our show for this week. Scriptnotes is produced by Drew Marquardt and edited by Matthew Chilelli. Our outro this week is by Nick Moore. If you have an outro, you can send a link to ask at johnaugust.com. That is also a place where you can send questions like the ones we answered today. You’ll find transcripts at johnaugust.com along with a sign-up for our weekly newsletter. Those are called Interesting, which is lots of links to things about writing.

You’ll find clips and helpful video on our YouTube to search for Script Notes and give us a follow. You’ll also find us on Instagram @ScriptnotesPodcast. We have T-shirts and hoodies and drinkwear. You’ll find all those at Cotton Bureau. You can find show notes with links to all the things we talked about today in the email you get each week as a premium subscriber.

Thank you to our premium subscribers. You make it possible for us to do this each and every week. You can sign up to become one at scriptnotes.net where you get all those back episodes and bonus segments like the ones we referred to and the new one, we’re about to record on day jobs. Nora Garrett, thank you so much for coming on Script Notes.

Nora: Thank you for having me.

[Bonus Segment]

John: All right. Let’s talk about day jobs because you are now a produced screenwriter, but for a long time, you were doing other things along the way. Let’s talk about some of the different day jobs you’ve had, some pros and cons of a person who needs to keep a roof over their head but also have brain space and time to do the things they want to do. What day jobs have you had over your life?

Nora: What day jobs have I not had? I was a personal trainer. I was a personal assistant. I was a professional organizer. I was a data analyst. I was studying to be a paralegal. I was a waitress and a cater waiter and a hostess.

John: That’s good. That’s a whole range of things. Let’s talk about the service industry side first, because you mentioned how at Chateau Marmont, you had been a hostess at Chateau Marmont. Then you’re going there for a meeting, which is a very classic moment. That’s a movie moment right there.

Nora: Very movie moment, yes.

John: As a hostess or as a waiter, some pros I can imagine is you leave the job, you’re off the job, you’re done. Great. You probably have a little bit more flexibility when it comes for auditions, which is the thing you were having to do.

Nora: Yes. Being a waiter was one of my favorite jobs.

John: What kinds of restaurants were you waiting at?

Nora: I worked at Dominic’s before it closed down, may it rest in peace. It was a great restaurant. Then I worked at Crossroads, the vegan restaurant, which was– That was one of those environments where the chef was really totalitarian. You had to call him chef. That was my first experience of that. Then I worked at Little Dom’s and Chateau Marmont.

John: In picking those jobs or in giving those jobs, were you trying to optimize your hours to make your life manageable in a way that you could also write and do other things? Talk to us about that decision.

Nora: Yes. I always really enjoyed the flexibility of being able to be on a schedule that wasn’t a nine-to-five because not only could you get everything done that one needed to do during the day at a time where it wasn’t completely clogged with other people, but also, I liked being able to have my days free to write, to audition. The hard thing about working in the service industry is it’s like your days are free, but also, you’re working very late. There is that counterbalance of like there were times that I would write when I got home from work because you’re just so wired. You’re up until three, and then you’re sleeping until noon.

John: Talk to us about you’re waiting on these people. You’re waiting on decision makers. You’re waiting on parents, people who could be reading you, who could be casting you and things. To what degree is that a factor, or you just stop thinking about it?

Nora: I think the great gift of entering into this industry as an actor is the lack of control that you have in that profession is huge. The amount of control you have as a writer feels like the greatest relief in comparison. The thing that was always really difficult for me about being an actor was this feeling of like I can’t just go home and practice my instrument. I can’t go home and play violin, but you can go home and write. Then you have a product, and you have something that you can look at and read over and edit, and it’s immediate and pleasurable in that way.

There was a huge sense of frustration and a huge sense of, I think, impotence. Bradley Whitford, I think, talks about that. I think it was a commencement address at Juilliard or something like that. This idea that you have so much passion and desire and drive and need, and then you have this blockade of being like, “Well, if no one’s going to let me do this, I can’t do it.” I think it’s important to find something that’s lovely about working these type of day jobs in this city of Los Angeles is that almost everybody is trying to do the same thing as you. That can be demoralizing at times, or it can be really lovely to think like we’re all in the same boat, and so we might as well try to do something together.

John: If you were a waiter in Denver who dreamed of being a professional actor, well, you’re just delusional.

Nora: It’s like you’re in the wrong city.

[laughter]

John: Let’s talk through some of the other day jobs. Personal trainer? Was it personal shopper or a personal assistant?

Nora: Personal assistant. I wish I was a personal shopper.

John: That would be incredible. Personal trainer, I have many friends who are trainers, like my trainer, but other friends who train folks. Yes, you can set your schedule to some degree, but you’re always relying on other people showing up, not showing up. It doesn’t stop, I suspect.

Nora: No. Personal trainers do not get paid enough to teach classes. The people teaching your Pilates classes, your HIIT classes, they do not get paid enough. I was teaching a class that was-

John: You weren’t doing one-on-one clients. You were doing classes.

Nora: No, because I worked at a very fancy place where you had to teach the classes with the students. It was dance cardio because I used to be a dancer. It was very Jane Fonda adjacent. The reason I stopped is because I got a stress fracture in the middle of one of my classes. Being a dancer, I was like, it’s fine. I’ll go for another hour. I did. I was like, I’m in a lot of pain. That was the reason that job ended because I had to be in a boot after that. That was a crazy experience because it’s just I’ve never worked out so much in my life.

John: I have actor friends on Big Fish who would teach spin classes and things like that. It’s like, Jesus, your body.

Nora: You don’t even feel good. You’re a receptacle for food, and then you’re just constantly sweating.

[laughter]

John: Data analyst. This was at Meta.

Nora: This is at Meta.

John: Was that your last day job?

Nora: That was my last day job. I had taken a break from working in restaurants to be an assistant for the longest gig I had an assistantship for, which is about five years.

John: Assistant to what kind of person?

Nora: I did a couple. I did actresses, and then I had a stint with producers at CBS and then produce director. I bobbed around.

John: This was personal life stuff? Basically, get me this thing, deal with the plumber, that kind of assistant thing?

Nora: It was both personal life stuff, and it was also all of my on-set experience. I’d been on set a lot, which was invaluable. It was also partially writing experience as well and staffing and reading and coverage and all of that kind of stuff.

John: If you’re working, imagine like an actor on set and you’re a personal assistant for them, what is your relationship between it? Your first responsibility is to that person, but you also have to deal with the crew and production itself. How does that interface work?

Nora: It’s really difficult. I think being a personal assistant is one of the most fraught jobs because it’s all of the intimacy of an intimate relationship without any of the perks. I think it’s really difficult to hire someone to basically be a facsimile of you. Once they get good at it, I think there’s all sorts of identity politics that happen where you’re like, “I want you to be able to write my emails,” and you’re opening up your life to someone. I think it’s really difficult on both sides.

John: This does tie back into your movie then, of course, because I share everything with you. You don’t share anything back.

Nora: Exactly. This notion of like, oh, I’m being collected in some way, but I’m also collecting. I think the weird, tacit understanding of being a personal assistant is that obviously, most people who become assistants are trying to replicate a guild thing where you’re like, okay, I’m going to learn from you.

John: I’m the apprentice and you are this.

Nora: Exactly. That’s a difficult thing because you have to, I think as a boss, have to understand that your assistant has ambition. At the same time, if they’re really good, you don’t want to lose them. It’s a really strange dynamic. I think it’s difficult on both sides.

John: That gets us to meta. You just apply to an open job?

Nora: I went down the LinkedIn rabbit hole where I was– I mean, God, just throwing cover letters into the void. I think I was just at a point where I went back to restaurant work. I went back, and I was a counter service waitress at Pine & Crane.
Going back to a restaurant at 31 is much different than in my twenties. My body was just getting wrecked. I was getting really mentally exhausted and feeling really bad about myself, especially compared to my friends who had enough disposable income to go on vacations and do fun things. I was like, “Okay, someone’s got to give. I’ve got to figure something out.” I started the LinkedIn route. I was actually recruited by meta because of some editing work that I had done for a nonprofit.

John: Some video editing or some text editing?

Nora: Some text editing. Yes, some text editing and development that I had done for a nonprofit. They’ve recruited me to be a data analyst.

John: Let’s talk through your advice to, let’s say, the next Nora is moving out from New York to Los Angeles and is looking for a day job so that they can act or write. Where to first? Do you think restaurants is the right, best first place? What’s your instinct?

Nora: I love restaurants. I think especially because it’s where I earned all my friends. It’s where I earned. It’s where I met all my friends. I had to work. I think especially most people who are attracted to this business are people who really thrive on novelty. The lovely thing about a restaurant is that every day is different. You really observe human behavior from close proximity. It gives you a lot of wonderful skills of memorization but also performance. As depressing as it is to have spaghetti sauce on your hands and under your fingernails for five days out of the week, it’s like there’s also some type of brilliant resilience in that.

John: Cool. Awesome. Thanks for this.

Nora: Thank you. Thanks so much.

Links:

  • Read along with our excerpts from After the Hunt
  • Nora Garrett
  • After the Hunt
  • Episode 667 – The One with Justin Kuritzkes
  • The Rehearsal
  • Flesh World by Jessica DeFino
  • Big Reader Bad Grades
  • BenDeLaCreme on Good One
  • Preorder the Scriptnotes Book!
  • Get a Scriptnotes T-shirt!
  • Check out the Inneresting Newsletter
  • Become a Scriptnotes Premium member, or gift a subscription
  • Subscribe to Scriptnotes on YouTube
  • Scriptnotes on Instagram
  • John August on Bluesky and Instagram
  • Outro by Nick Moore (send us yours!)
  • Scriptnotes is produced by Drew Marquardt and edited by Matthew Chilelli.

Email us at ask@johnaugust.com

You can download the episode here.

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Newsletter

Inneresting Logo A Quote-Unquote Newsletter about Writing
Read Now

Explore

Projects

  • Aladdin (1)
  • Arlo Finch (27)
  • Big Fish (88)
  • Birdigo (2)
  • Charlie (39)
  • Charlie's Angels (16)
  • Chosen (2)
  • Corpse Bride (9)
  • Dead Projects (18)
  • Frankenweenie (10)
  • Go (29)
  • Karateka (4)
  • Monsterpocalypse (3)
  • One Hit Kill (6)
  • Ops (6)
  • Preacher (2)
  • Prince of Persia (13)
  • Shazam (6)
  • Snake People (6)
  • Tarzan (5)
  • The Nines (118)
  • The Remnants (12)
  • The Variant (22)

Apps

  • Bronson (14)
  • FDX Reader (11)
  • Fountain (32)
  • Highland (75)
  • Less IMDb (4)
  • Weekend Read (64)

Recommended Reading

  • First Person (87)
  • Geek Alert (151)
  • WGA (162)
  • Workspace (19)

Screenwriting Q&A

  • Adaptation (65)
  • Directors (90)
  • Education (49)
  • Film Industry (489)
  • Formatting (128)
  • Genres (89)
  • Glossary (6)
  • Pitches (29)
  • Producers (59)
  • Psych 101 (118)
  • Rights and Copyright (96)
  • So-Called Experts (47)
  • Story and Plot (170)
  • Television (165)
  • Treatments (21)
  • Words on the page (237)
  • Writing Process (177)

More screenwriting Q&A at screenwriting.io

© 2026 John August — All Rights Reserved.