• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

John August

  • Arlo Finch
  • Scriptnotes
  • Library
  • Store
  • About

QandA

Women, screenwriting and confidence

August 8, 2012 Film Industry, Follow Up, Psych 101

Continuing the podcast discussion on the comparatively low number of female screenwriters, listener Elana writes in to call attention to Deborah Tannen’s book, Talking from 9 to 5: Women and Men at Work:

> In the book, she at one point floats the theory that the Glass Ceiling is actually an issue of how confidence is perceived in different groups, and how groups are socialized to express (or not) that confidence starting in childhood. Women, she theorizes, are socialized very early to not speak too well of themselves, whereas young boys are both subtly and overtly rewarded for boasting about themselves a little bit.

> I’ve often wondered if the above is at play in screenwriting. So much of screenwriting as a career is not really about the words on the page but much more about how you come into a room and tell terrified people that you can save their asses and fix their franchise. Even at the level of interest [in the profession], I wonder if this is a factor. Perhaps even to submit to the Nicholl or to you guys, or to ask an agent to read your material, one needs to feel comfortable donning the mantle of “I’m probably pretty awesome”? Maybe, even to get interested in screenwriting in a minor way, you have to believe that you are crazy amazing and can beat insane odds.

> I am just speculating, but I would be prepared to believe that men, on a population level, are more likely to do that than women. That might account for some of the difference in interest levels.

To me, this speaks to the importance of modeling. Often, you don’t aspire to become something until you see someone like you achieve it. The best way to get more female screenwriters (and directors) is to raise the visibility of those we already have.

Better yet, don’t write anything at all

July 31, 2012 Words on the page, Writing Process

I quite like Colson Whitehead’s tongue-in-cheek [writing advice](http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/29/books/review/colson-whiteheads-rules-for-writing.html?_r=3&src=me&ref=general&pagewanted=all):

> **Rule No. 6:** What isn’t said is as important as what is said. In many classic short stories, the real action occurs in the silences. Try to keep all the good stuff off the page.

> Some “real world” practice might help. The next time your partner comes home, ignore his or her existence for 30 minutes, and then blurt out “That’s it!” and drive the car onto the neighbor’s lawn. When your children approach at bedtime, squeeze their shoulders meaningfully and, if you’re a woman, smear your lipstick across your face with the back of your wrist, or, if you’re a man, weep violently until they say, “It’s O.K., Dad.”

> Drink out of a chipped mug, a souvenir from a family vacation or weekend getaway in better times, one that can trigger a two-paragraph compare/contrast description later on. It’s a bit like Method acting. Simply let this thought guide your every word and gesture: “Something is wrong — can you guess what it is?” If you’re going for something a little more postmodern, repeat the above, but with fish.

How the summer movie season expanded

July 30, 2012 Film Industry

Dustin Rowles looks at how studios learned to look beyond the [summer release schedule](http://www.pajiba.com/box_office_round-ups/six-movie-milestones-that-helped-shape-blockbuster-boxoffice-release-schedules.php):

> They were releasing too many tentpoles in a short period of time, and they were cannibalizing each other. The studios adjusted. The box-office release schedule evolved. The summer season expanded. Months that used to be dumping grounds became profitable. Big budget films were finding unusual times to exploit audiences.

> Gradually — and we’re still in the midst of this expansion — studios began to realize that Memorial Day through the first of August and the holiday season between Thanksgiving and Christmas were not the only times a a studio could release a $100 million film. They could also make money in January. And March.

Horace Deidu came to many of the same conclusions — [with charts!](http://www.asymco.com/2012/02/07/hollywood-by-the-numbers/) — when he looked at movie release schedules. The summer pattern is still dominant, but an increasing number of titles have made $100+ outside of that window.

In fact, for 2011, the only months that didn’t have a $100+ title were January, September and November. And November was an oddball — it’s traditionally a big month.

Writing better bad guys

July 24, 2012 Story and Plot

Chuck Wendig has 25 things [you should know about antagonists](http://terribleminds.com/ramble/2012/07/24/25-things-you-should-know-about-antagonists):

> Antagonists who do evil just to do evil are basically big fucking cartoons. They’re Snidely Whiplash. They’re Cobra Commander. They’re Pageant Moms, Nancy Grace, Rush Limbaugh. In other words: boring, unbelievable, and totally untenable. Give them motivations beyond “being the biggest dick I can be.” Yes, you can in certain modes and stories get away with this (see: Batman’s Joker, or nearly any killer in slasher films), but it’s hard, and it puts an even greater weight on the shoulders of the protagonist.

One of the challenges of screenwriting is finding the sweet spot between two opposing needs:

– You want your protagonist to be pushing the story, and not just responding to problems.
– You want your antagonist to keep making life as difficult as possible for your hero, constantly raising the stakes.

Basically, your protagonist and antagonist each want to drive the plot. They’re fighting for control of the steering wheel.

If you remember that [every villain is a hero](http://johnaugust.com/2009/every-villain-is-a-hero), it’s often helpful to look at the whole story from the other guy’s point of view. Don’t just ask what the villain wants. Ask what the villain needs. Look for an arc so that he can change as well.

That doesn’t mean you ultimately have to split your time evenly between hero and villain. You almost certainly shouldn’t. But knowing what that guy’s movie would be can help you find the best story overall.

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Newsletter

Inneresting Logo A Quote-Unquote Newsletter about Writing
Read Now

Explore

Projects

  • Aladdin (1)
  • Arlo Finch (27)
  • Big Fish (88)
  • Birdigo (2)
  • Charlie (39)
  • Charlie's Angels (16)
  • Chosen (2)
  • Corpse Bride (9)
  • Dead Projects (18)
  • Frankenweenie (10)
  • Go (29)
  • Karateka (4)
  • Monsterpocalypse (3)
  • One Hit Kill (6)
  • Ops (6)
  • Preacher (2)
  • Prince of Persia (13)
  • Shazam (6)
  • Snake People (6)
  • Tarzan (5)
  • The Nines (118)
  • The Remnants (12)
  • The Variant (22)

Apps

  • Bronson (14)
  • FDX Reader (11)
  • Fountain (32)
  • Highland (73)
  • Less IMDb (4)
  • Weekend Read (64)

Recommended Reading

  • First Person (87)
  • Geek Alert (151)
  • WGA (162)
  • Workspace (19)

Screenwriting Q&A

  • Adaptation (65)
  • Directors (90)
  • Education (49)
  • Film Industry (490)
  • Formatting (128)
  • Genres (89)
  • Glossary (6)
  • Pitches (29)
  • Producers (59)
  • Psych 101 (118)
  • Rights and Copyright (96)
  • So-Called Experts (47)
  • Story and Plot (170)
  • Television (165)
  • Treatments (21)
  • Words on the page (237)
  • Writing Process (177)

More screenwriting Q&A at screenwriting.io

© 2026 John August — All Rights Reserved.