
Congrats, [Vermont](http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30089125/).

Congrats, [Vermont](http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30089125/).

Update: Yes, I had forgotten Connecticut. Every apology.
It’s that time again:
> Script Frenzy is an international writing event in which participants take on the challenge of writing 100 pages of scripted material in the month of April. As part of a donation-funded nonprofit, Script Frenzy charges no fee to participate; there are also no valuable prizes awarded or “best” scripts singled out. Every writer who completes the goal of 100 pages is victorious and awe-inspiring and will receive a handsome Script Frenzy Winner’s Certificate and web icon proclaiming this fact. Even those who fall short of the word goal will be applauded for making a heroic attempt. Really, you have nothing to lose—except that nagging feeling that there’s a script inside you that may never get out.
It’s like [NaNoWriMo](http://www.nanowrimo.org/), but for scripts. If it helps motivate you to actually write, give it a shot.
You can find all the info at the [Script Frenzy site](http://www.scriptfrenzy.org/).
Clay Shirky’s piece [Newspapers and Thinking the Unthinkable](http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/03/newspapers-and-thinking-the-unthinkable/) is worth all the links it’s been getting:
> When someone demands to know how we are going to replace newspapers, they are really demanding to be told that we are not living through a revolution. They are demanding to be told that old systems won’t break before new systems are in place. They are demanding to be told that ancient social bargains aren’t in peril, that core institutions will be spared, that new methods of spreading information will improve previous practice rather than upending it. They are demanding to be lied to.
He’s writing specifically about print journalism, but it’s hard not to extrapolate the argument to all our paid and unpaid media. What does television look like ten years from now? We don’t know. We scramble to establish bulwarks and business models, all the while quietly suspecting that we’re going to guess wrong.
> The newspaper people often note that newspapers benefit society as a whole. This is true, but irrelevant to the problem at hand; “You’re gonna miss us when we’re gone!” has never been much of a business model.
Shirky’s article is a great candidate for the [Readability bookmarklet](http://lab.arc90.com/experiments/readability/), by the way.