John August

Follow Up

Convert old Final Draft files, in five clever-but-tedious steps

Follow Up, Geek Alert, Screenwriting Software

Last week, I [urged](http://johnaugust.com/2012/pricing-fdx-reader) Final Draft to release a free converter app to let screenwriters move their old-and-busted .fdr files to the newer .fdx format.

A reader wrote in to say that Final Draft already has one. Sort of.

The evaluation version of Final Draft 8 — which supports both .fdr and .fdx — is free on the Final Draft website.

You can open an .fdr file, then save it as .fdx. The problem is, the evaluation version is limited to 15 pages.

[Mac Harwood](http://MacHarwood.blogspot.com/) has a solution:

> 1. Select the menu Format > Elements to bring up the Elements dialog box.
> 2. In the Font tab, select ‘Set Font’ and change the font size to ’1′.
> 3. Then press Apply Font/Size to all elements.
> 4. In the Paragraph tab, set ‘Space before’ to be 0, and then do the same for each element.

> Now the 200 page epic will only be a few pages, which you can save with the evaluation version.

This works, but the resulting file is a mess of tiny letters. His fix:

> Just open up the created .fdx file in your favourite text editor (I use Notepad++) and do a search and replace for all occurrences of “Size=1″ to a blank. Then save.

This workflow could save your life if you were stuck somewhere with an .fdr file and no way to open it, but it’s hardly a practical solution for screenwriters staring at folders full of old files. ((If someone out there finds a way to automate this crazy workflow, let me know.))

Erik Harrison offers a possible explanation for why a Final Draft converter isn’t forthcoming:

> There probably ISN’T a file format [for .fdr]. It’s likely just a binary dump of the state of internal memory at the time of save. Certainly that was true of a lot of word processors I used in the old day, and even still is true for Word in some senses.

If that’s the case, it helps explain why the new iPad app doesn’t support .fdr. In order to support the old format, the app would have to duplicate way too much of the full Final Draft.

What free gets you on Kindle

Follow Up, Snake People, The Variant

Last week, I [ran an experiment](http://johnaugust.com/2012/spelunking-the-kindle-market-contd) to see what would happen if I took one of my existing Kindle titles and made it free for three days.

[Snake People](http://www.amazon.com/Snake-People-ebook/dp/B004H8GF0U/) got a lot of downloads. Over the three days, it “sold” 654 times. It climbed the charts, topping out at #7 on Kindle’s free short stories list.

Since returning to its normal price of 99 cents on Saturday, it sold seven more copies. It no longer shows up on any of the best-seller charts. In no way did it catch fire.

However, if you compare those seven copies to how many it would have sold in a normal week — 2.2 copies on average — the free promo seemed to at least bump the needle. There was also a fair amount of spillover to my other Kindle title ([The Variant](http://www.amazon.com/The-Variant-ebook/dp/B0029ZAPRW/)), which sold 13 copies, up from its average of five.

In another week or two, I suspect Snake People numbers will be back where they were before the promo. I’ll post another update if I’m wrong.

So, was going free worth it? Hard to say.

It certainly increased sampling, and it was gratifying to see readers tweet about it, particularly those who stumbled across it on the best-seller chart and took a chance. I strongly doubt it cost me any buyers; the people who got it free hadn’t been holding off, waiting for a sale.

In the end, I’m hesitant to even label this an experiment because the numbers are so sketchy. I’d hoped to provide a graph showing how many copies were sold based on which spot it reached on the best-seller list, but I can’t. Amazon’s sales figures are maddeningly murky. You can’t be sure how often they’re updated, so any correlation is suspect.

As Snake People was rising on the best-sellers chart, the dashboard report would only show five more copies had sold. An hour later, 100 more sales showed up. Were those additional sales the cause or effect of moving higher in the best-sellers chart? There’s no way to know.

Most writers are probably better off writing new stuff than spending a lot of time gaming the Kindle publishing platform. That said, the spillover effect from one free title to other paid titles probably merits some attention, particularly for authors with many titles available for sale. If I had 15 books for sale on Kindle, rotating free sales periods among them would be a way to increase exposure and probably bring in new paying readers.

Spelunking the Kindle market, cont’d.

Books, Follow Up, Snake People, The Variant

I’ve written several times about my experiments with self-publishing on the Kindle, mostly concerning my short story [The Variant](http://johnaugust.com/variant), which briefly hit #18 on the overall bestsellers list.

Overall, I found Amazon’s ebook tools satisfactory, but the price structure was [frustrating](http://johnaugust.com/2009/spelunking-the-kindle-market):

> Amazon doesn’t distinguish between free and paid content on their Kindle bestseller list. In fact, 19 out of the top 50 books are free. There’s nothing wrong with free, but it’s a semantic and tactical mistake to include them on a “bestseller” list.

They’ve fixed that.

Free books are now listed separately, and with the introduction of the KDP Select program, self-publishers can finally price a title as free for up to five days. (Before this, only major publishers could set the price at zero.)

snake people coverAfter reading [David Kazzie’s post](http://wahoocorner.blogspot.com/2012/01/how-kdp-select-saved-my-book.html) about his experience with KDP Select, I decided to try it out on another one of my short stories, [Snake People](http://www.amazon.com/Snake-People-ebook/dp/B004H8GF0U/), which had gotten nice reviews but never achieved the traction of The Variant.

To enter KDP Select, you have to promise that the title isn’t available for sale anywhere other than Amazon. Unlike The Variant, I wasn’t selling Snake People as a PDF, so there was nothing to take down.

Dropping the price is handled through a pop-up box called the Promotions Manager. The only option listed for me was “free book,” but the system seems to be designed for more-extensive campaigns. You’re allowed to be free for up to five days total, divided however you want.

Snake People went free yesterday (February 1st), and as of this writing sits at #20 on Kindle’s free [short stories list](http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/digital-text/157087011/ref=pd_zg_hrsr_kstore_2_4_last), with 75 copies “sold” in the last 24 hours.

The list is everything
—

From our experience with [Bronson Watermarker](http://quoteunquoteapps.com/bronson), we’ve learned that where you fall on the lists has a huge impact on sales. The higher you’re ranked, the more people see you. The more you’re seen, the more you’re purchased. Winners keep winning.

The pure ranking matters, but even more important is where the page breaks.

For Bronson, we made the front page of the Mac App Store in the “New and Notable” section. For the two weeks we were there, our sales were ten times normal. Once we fell to the second page of “New and Notable,” we quickly regressed to the mean.

I realize that writing about Snake People while the experiment is still running will inevitably corrupt the data. Some readers will click and buy it because hey, [it’s free](http://www.amazon.com/Snake-People-ebook/dp/B004H8GF0U/ref=zg_bs_157087011_20).

And that’s okay. I mostly want more data to answer correlation questions: If 75 copies lands a title at #20, how many copies is the #1 short story “selling?”

In my initial experiments with The Variant, I was able to estimate how much Stephanie Meyer was bringing in off of her Twilight books. (A lot.) I’m curious what the numbers mean in Kindle’s new free ecosystem.

So if you haven’t checked out Snake People, [go get it](http://www.amazon.com/Snake-People-ebook/dp/B004H8GF0U/) before the promotion ends on Friday. I’ll publish a follow-up on Monday with numbers.

Shine on, you Kubrick theorists

Directors, Follow Up

When I [criticized](http://johnaugust.com/2011/cinematic-geography-and-problem-of-genius) Rob Ager’s analysis of spatial impossibilities in The Shining, I didn’t realize the extent of [wild theories about Kubrick’s film](http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/29/movies/room-237-documentary-with-theories-about-the-shining.html?_r=2&src=me&ref=movies):

> “Room 237,” the first full-length documentary by the director Rodney Ascher, examines several of the most intriguing of these theories. It’s really about the Holocaust, one interviewee says, and Mr. Kubrick’s inability to address the horrors of the Final Solution on film. No, it’s about a different genocide, that of American Indians, another says, pointing to all the tribal-theme items adorning the Overlook Hotel’s walls. A third claims it’s really Kubrick’s veiled confession that he helped NASA fake the Apollo Moon landings.

Of course, we’ll never know Kubrick’s true intentions, because he’s dead.

*Unless he isn’t.*