• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

John August

  • Arlo Finch
  • Scriptnotes
  • Library
  • Store
  • About

John

Hollywood interns aren’t essential

July 14, 2011 Film Industry, Follow Up

Nicole Iizuka ([@nicolemiizuka](https://twitter.com/#!/nicolemiizuka)) took issue with [my remark](http://johnaugust.com/2011/suing-to-get-an-agent-contd) that “All the interns in Los Angeles could get Raptured tomorrow and the town would function just fine.”

I asked her to prove me wrong, and she answered the challenge [on her blog](http://www.cakeandheels.com/2011/07/why-hollywood-interns-are-indispensable.html).

It’s a nicely put-together post. You might want to open it in another tab and read it. Go ahead. I’ll be here.

Are you back? Great. Here’s where I think she’s right.

**1) Internship is a useful filtering mechanism.**

When hiring assistants, Hollywood looks for internship experience. It’s not as much about what the applicant has learned on those internships, but the fact that she worked someplace without burning the building down.

An internship means a reference. A name. A phone number. Prospective employers want someone they can call to answer the most important question: “Would I regret hiring this person?”

**2) Assistants like having interns working for them.**

In my last assistant job, I supervised three interns. And yes, when you’re at the bottom of the totem pole, it’s nice to bring in someone below you.

But did I *need* interns? No.

Because I couldn’t be certain they’d actually show up, all the work I assigned them was, by definition, inessential: reading scripts we didn’t particularly care about, compiling file boxes that would be shipped off to storage forever. And yes, interns answer phones when assistants run to the restroom. But so does voicemail.

These two points conceded, I don’t think Nicole has made a convincing case that Hollywood would fall apart upon Intern Rapture.

> First off, there have been numerous cases and articles stating the obvious, that businesses heavily rely on a young and eager staff of free labor to keep their bottom lines at bay. While there is a general sense of deep coffers when it comes to the industry, excess spending by studio executives, actors, directors and producers living luxurious lives, in reality most companies barely budget a meager salary for their underpaid and overworked assistants. Add to that a seemingly insurmountable list of daily tasks, and companies’ unwillingness to hire more employees; we are left in a place where interns are an absolute necessity.

Without links to these cases and articles, she appears to be begging the question; interns are indispensable because they’re indispensable.

> If they disappeared tomorrow, riots would break out, people would quit their jobs or suffer mental breakdowns and the generally smooth operation of the daily grind of Hollywood would go into chaos.

And after everyone’s done rending their clothes, all the things that interns do right now would be divided into three categories:

1. Stuff assistants will now do
2. Stuff we’ll hire freelancers to do (e.g. writing coverage)
3. Stuff that just won’t get done

Of these, I think #3 would be the biggest category.

Revisting my first conceded point: Without interns, where would Hollywood find qualified assistants?

Answer: At top-tier schools, same as always.

The problem isn’t a dearth of qualified candidates. The filtering aspect of internship is simply a way of separating the awesome wheat from the only-okay wheat. College already got rid of the chaff.

While it’s true that ultimately no one in Hollywood really cares where you went to school or what grades you got, an Ivy League education is always going to be a helpful pre-filter. Right now, young Brown grads land internships with alums. If there were no interns, those same Brown grads would land interviews for assistant jobs.

When you take out the bottom rung of the ladder, there’s still a ladder.

Without internship experience, these newly hired assistants would have a rougher first couple of weeks. But they’d survive. And so would Hollywood.

The Intern Rapture is a thought experiment. None of this should be read as an attack on interns or the idea of internship. Interns work hard, and often benefit from exposure and experience.

There are fair criticisms to be leveled at the current system, which benefits young people who can afford to work for free. But at the same time, Hollywood internships help level the playing field; nepotism and a brand-name degree don’t count for much when you’re making copies and coffee-runs. Either you can write good coverage or you can’t. Internships are an opportunity to prove yourself.

I was an intern from a Midwestern university. I parlayed my first internship into a paid reading gig because I worked harder. I made myself useful.

But there’s a wide gap between “useful” and “essential.” I don’t think Nicole has demonstrated that interns — either individually or collectively — are actually vital to the workings of Hollywood.

Javier Grillo-Marxuach on craft

July 14, 2011 Television, Words on the page

The Tiny Protagonist has a [good interview](http://thetinyprotagonist.wordpress.com/2011/07/12/interview-javier-grillo-marxuach-of-lost-and-the-middleman-part-1-of-2/) with Javier Grillo-Marxuach (a writer/producer on Lost and many other shows), talking about how he got started and the craft of television.

I like his explanation of keeping the reader engaged:

> You know what a Gilligan cut is? It’s how on Gilligan’s Island, the captain always goes, “I’m not wearing the chicken suit!” and then bam –- he’s wearing the chicken suit. A Gilligan cut is very much a SMASH CUT TO. So if I have two scenes that are sort of languid scenes of characters, you probably don’t put a CUT TO. But if you’re doing a Gilligan cut, then you put a SMASH CUT, and instead of using a slug line, you turn your slug line into the captain wearing the chicken suit, and you describe the setting later. So you do things like that really to try to get the reader involved with the prose so they don’t just go from dialogue to dialogue.

To get a sense of his style, check out [Grillo-Marxuach’s site](http://web.mac.com/chaodai/Grillo_Marxuach_Design_Bureau/projects.html), where he’s posted a bunch of his scripts, treatments and pitch documents.

He also discusses one thing I’ve come to appreciate over the years: screenwriting does get easier with practice. What you lose in youthful energy you make up for in finesse:

> I find that, what experience gives you is craft, which means that when inspiration fails you, you can still build a pretty workable set of bookcases, even if they’re not the prettiest bookcases. And an ability to cope, mostly to cope with the psychological rigors of the job.

Final Draft and Lion, friends again

July 13, 2011 Follow Up, Screenwriting Software

With Mac OS X Lion due any moment, Final Draft has released version 8.0.2, which should [allow it to launch](http://johnaugust.com/2011/final-draft-wont-work-under-lion):

> Final Draft v.8.0.2 has been engineered to run on OS X 10.7 (Lion). It’s available as a free download [HERE](http://www.finaldraft.com/support/software/final-draft-8.php).

> **V.8.0.2 is the only version of Final Draft that will work on this operating system. Final Draft v.7 and older will NOT work on Lion.**

> The free 8.0.2 installer is an operating system-specific patch with no new features or fixes other than 10.7 (Lion) compatibility.

You have to log in with your FD registration number to get to the installer, which feels clunky in the age of auto-updaters. But it’s otherwise painless.

I don’t have a Lion beta to test it against, but the updated app seems to work properly under 10.6. Upon launch it asked me to activate again, which gave me a moment of panic. The online activation worked without incident, however.

Final Draft won’t work under Lion

July 12, 2011 Screenwriting Software

**Update:** [Final Draft and Lion, friends again](http://johnaugust.com/2011/final-draft-and-lion-friends-again)

Last week, Final Draft sent out an email to customers:

> Apple has announced they will release their latest operating system, Mac OS Lion (OSX 10.7) this July. Many of our valued customers are Mac users, so we feel it is important to let you know how this Mac OS update will affect your version of Final Draft software.

> **Final Draft version 8 Users:**
> A FREE update for version 8 users will be available at www.finaldraft.com/downloads/software-updates.php for registered users. If you plan to upgrade your operating system to 10.7, update Final Draft version 8 first for an optimal user experience. Without the update, changes in the new Mac OSX 10.7 will prevent Final Draft version 8 from launching. Once you update your version 8 software, you can activate and run the Final Draft application on your Mac. The new OS will not allow the Final Draft application to run for other users on a given computer unless those users also install and activate Final Draft while logged in under their own user name. If you do not intend to upgrade your OS to 10.7, there is no need to update your version of Final Draft.

Wait, huh?

How do you define “optimal user experience?” Oh — the app *won’t even launch.*

Yes, that does seem sub-optimal.

The included URL takes you to a placeholder page saying that a revised version (8.0.2) is coming soon. So it seems odd to include it as a clickable link. Sending users to a “News” or “Updates” page feels like a much better destination. ((I won’t even mention the 2007-style .php extension on the URL. Except in this footnote.))

To be fair, many Mac apps will need revisions in order to run properly under the new OS. It’s better to warn customers now before they upgrade. But the email was so strangely written that many colleagues assumed it was just Final Draft trying to upsell longtime screenwriters clinging to their old versions.

The company didn’t have to look far for better copy-writers. Their own knowledge base article is [much more clear-cut](http://support.finaldraft.com/article.aspx?cid=1001&aid=9163):

> Will Final Draft run on Mac OS X 10.7 (Lion)?

> **Not yet.** We expect to release Final Draft v.**8.0.2** as a free download at the same time as Lion’s official release by Apple. The new version has been engineered to run on OS X 10.7 (Lion) **and is the only version of Final Draft that will work on this operating system.** If you have v.8 and are planning to upgrade to Lion, we urge you to wait for the patch. The current version of Final Draft 8 is not activatable on this new operating system.

> **Final Draft v.7 and older will NOT work on Lion.**

> The free 8.0.2 installer is an operating system-specific patch with no new features or fixes other than 10.7 (Lion) compatibility.

Much better, right?

I know several screenwriters who are incensed that Final Draft won’t support running FD6 or FD7 under Lion. But I’m siding with the company here. I think users have the right to keep using software as long as they want, but developers have the right to stop supporting old versions they haven’t sold in years, particularly when operating systems change.

Movie Magic Screenwriter is drawing the same [line in the sand](http://support.screenplay.com/answercenter/questions.php?questionid=789):

> All versions of Movie Magic Screenwriter prior to version 6 are not compatible with Mac OS 10.7 (Lion).

They say the current version (6.0.6) will work, with the exception of four tools: Compare Two Documents, Name Bank, Thesaurus, and Export To. (Which, if you think about it, is a significant amount of functionality lost.)

Because I’m a giant nerd, I’ve cloned my startup drive so that I’ll be able to boot in either Lion or Snow Leopard until Final Draft gets its update out.

For less tech-savvy users, I’d urge waiting a bit before upgrading to Lion if there are scripts you need to work on in FD.

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Newsletter

Inneresting Logo A Quote-Unquote Newsletter about Writing
Read Now

Explore

Projects

  • Aladdin (1)
  • Arlo Finch (27)
  • Big Fish (88)
  • Birdigo (2)
  • Charlie (39)
  • Charlie's Angels (16)
  • Chosen (2)
  • Corpse Bride (9)
  • Dead Projects (18)
  • Frankenweenie (10)
  • Go (29)
  • Karateka (4)
  • Monsterpocalypse (3)
  • One Hit Kill (6)
  • Ops (6)
  • Preacher (2)
  • Prince of Persia (13)
  • Shazam (6)
  • Snake People (6)
  • Tarzan (5)
  • The Nines (118)
  • The Remnants (12)
  • The Variant (22)

Apps

  • Bronson (14)
  • FDX Reader (11)
  • Fountain (32)
  • Highland (75)
  • Less IMDb (4)
  • Weekend Read (64)

Recommended Reading

  • First Person (87)
  • Geek Alert (151)
  • WGA (162)
  • Workspace (19)

Screenwriting Q&A

  • Adaptation (65)
  • Directors (90)
  • Education (49)
  • Film Industry (489)
  • Formatting (128)
  • Genres (89)
  • Glossary (6)
  • Pitches (29)
  • Producers (59)
  • Psych 101 (118)
  • Rights and Copyright (96)
  • So-Called Experts (47)
  • Story and Plot (170)
  • Television (165)
  • Treatments (21)
  • Words on the page (237)
  • Writing Process (177)

More screenwriting Q&A at screenwriting.io

© 2026 John August — All Rights Reserved.