Turn to page 17 for a sex joke

questionmarkI’ve heard a rumor that in the “industry” it’s an inside joke to have some sort of nudity or sex on page 17. Specifically 17. First, is that actually funny? And second, is it a shoe-in in terms of a scriptreader reading further?

– Zeb
via imdb

I’ve never heard this, but I love it.

True, it’s not “actually” funny. Something so meta is almost never actually funny, because it relies on knowing something outside the world of the story. At best, it’s funny in the way a Charlie Kaufman movie is funny: it makes you feel clever for a moment, but you’re not going to wet your shorts with laughter.

I just checked, and the script I’m currently writing does not have a sex joke or nudity on page 17. Which is surprising, because the first act is seriously stuffed with sex jokes. And implied nudity, if that counts.

  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
January 5, 2006 @ 12:32 pm | Comments Off
Filed under: QandA

Comments are closed.

 

About

This site is run by screenwriter John August. Mostly, he answers reader-submitted questions about the craft, but occasionally he goes on tangents that run far afield of writing and filmmaking. You'll also find info on past, present and future projects.

Follow Me

On Twitter: @johnaugust

Ask a Question

If you have a question about screenwriting or my movies that hasn't been answered, by all means ask. There are a few guidelines to follow.

Featured Articles

101: Some screenwriting basics


There are more than 900 articles on the site. You can find category archives at the bottom of every page.

Read Me

  • The Variant
  • A new short story available for download, Kindle and iPhone.

Feeds