<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Final Draft 8, briefly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnaugust.com/archives/2009/final-draft-8-briefly/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2009/final-draft-8-briefly</link>
	<description>A ton of useful information about screenwriting.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:28:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kal</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2009/final-draft-8-briefly/comment-page-2#comment-172123</link>
		<dc:creator>kal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/?p=2904#comment-172123</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;how does pdf function behave? if you;&#039;re a busy working pro, it doesn&#039;t. ridiculous. you can&#039;t print as a pdf with title page anymore without reverting the file back to FD7. absurd. this is such a crucially important feature for me, as i am constantly making pdf&#039;s and sending my scripts that I&#039;m dumping mine and going back to fd7. How could they overlook this??&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how does pdf function behave? if you;&#8217;re a busy working pro, it doesn&#8217;t. ridiculous. you can&#8217;t print as a pdf with title page anymore without reverting the file back to FD7. absurd. this is such a crucially important feature for me, as i am constantly making pdf&#8217;s and sending my scripts that I&#8217;m dumping mine and going back to fd7. How could they overlook this??</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Francis</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2009/final-draft-8-briefly/comment-page-2#comment-172091</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/?p=2904#comment-172091</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Am I correct that FD7 renders pdf scripts into gigantic files of unsearchable images, rather than searchable text? How does FD8&#039;s pdf output behave?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I correct that FD7 renders pdf scripts into gigantic files of unsearchable images, rather than searchable text? How does FD8&#8217;s pdf output behave?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2009/final-draft-8-briefly/comment-page-2#comment-172053</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/?p=2904#comment-172053</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No one seems to talk about it, here, but I have both Final Draft 7 and a twenty-year-old version of ScriptWare. ScriptWare kicks Final Draft&#039;s a** in almost every regard. I&#039;m a pro screenwriter and, for the life of me, can&#039;t figure out why FD is the &quot;industry standard&quot;. They must have slipped someone a few bucks under the table.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one seems to talk about it, here, but I have both Final Draft 7 and a twenty-year-old version of ScriptWare. ScriptWare kicks Final Draft&#8217;s a** in almost every regard. I&#8217;m a pro screenwriter and, for the life of me, can&#8217;t figure out why FD is the &#8220;industry standard&#8221;. They must have slipped someone a few bucks under the table.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PMW</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2009/final-draft-8-briefly/comment-page-2#comment-171993</link>
		<dc:creator>PMW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/?p=2904#comment-171993</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Kirsten, if you are still lurking...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;*It would be nice if the Zoom level for the script view window had a &quot;Fit Visible&quot; option much like the Adobe Reader so that only the text is visible without the margins. Lots of screen real estate gets taken up with those margins.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;*I&#039;d like to be able to split panels at least twice so that I could have up to four panels sharing space on the screen.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;*I second for requests to add &quot;Save as PDF&quot; back in the file menu.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@Synthian &amp; Valiente&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You can set the zoom to any level you like by simply typing in the zoom level you desire in the zoom window. (At least on Windows you can.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kirsten, if you are still lurking&#8230;</p>

<p>*It would be nice if the Zoom level for the script view window had a &#8220;Fit Visible&#8221; option much like the Adobe Reader so that only the text is visible without the margins. Lots of screen real estate gets taken up with those margins.</p>

<p>*I&#8217;d like to be able to split panels at least twice so that I could have up to four panels sharing space on the screen.</p>

<p>*I second for requests to add &#8220;Save as PDF&#8221; back in the file menu.</p>

<p>@Synthian &amp; Valiente</p>

<p>You can set the zoom to any level you like by simply typing in the zoom level you desire in the zoom window. (At least on Windows you can.)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2009/final-draft-8-briefly/comment-page-2#comment-171821</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/?p=2904#comment-171821</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Richard&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Richard</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2009/final-draft-8-briefly/comment-page-2#comment-171665</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 20:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/?p=2904#comment-171665</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;TO ROB #50. It may be a little late, but to delete a character from Final Draft 7. Go to &#039;Document&#039; then &#039;SmartType.&#039; Or on a Mac, Command+L. There is a list of all your characters, places, etc. Click on the name and then the delete button. Poof, he/she/it no longer exists. Or course, you could always keep the misspelled word and try to use it. Have a character named &#039;Sussam&#039; instead of Susan. :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TO ROB #50. It may be a little late, but to delete a character from Final Draft 7. Go to &#8216;Document&#8217; then &#8216;SmartType.&#8217; Or on a Mac, Command+L. There is a list of all your characters, places, etc. Click on the name and then the delete button. Poof, he/she/it no longer exists. Or course, you could always keep the misspelled word and try to use it. Have a character named &#8216;Sussam&#8217; instead of Susan. :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2009/final-draft-8-briefly/comment-page-2#comment-171646</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 22:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/?p=2904#comment-171646</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@GeGe (#66) Does you computer have an integrated graphics chipset with shared memory or a proper graphics card? Both my laptops have integrated graphics, while the desktop has a 128Mb Nvidia card. I&#039;m wondering if this difference between both my laptops and my older desktop are responsible for the issue. Other possibility could be a Centrino-specific issue. Anyway, I&#039;ll stick to MMS6 whenever I need it. Software isn&#039;t that important, anyway, but it bugs me when I can&#039;t get some app to work as it should.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@GeGe (#66) Does you computer have an integrated graphics chipset with shared memory or a proper graphics card? Both my laptops have integrated graphics, while the desktop has a 128Mb Nvidia card. I&#8217;m wondering if this difference between both my laptops and my older desktop are responsible for the issue. Other possibility could be a Centrino-specific issue. Anyway, I&#8217;ll stick to MMS6 whenever I need it. Software isn&#8217;t that important, anyway, but it bugs me when I can&#8217;t get some app to work as it should.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeGe</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2009/final-draft-8-briefly/comment-page-2#comment-171573</link>
		<dc:creator>GeGe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/?p=2904#comment-171573</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Neson (#60)
Yep, I have the same problem here with the CPU load on my Toshiba laptop with Win XP both in FD 7 and 8 (Demo). For that reason FD is useless to me. Also, when writing, the letters are displayed in delay. This can be quite annoying, when writing fast.
FD 6 works fine.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Neson (#60)
Yep, I have the same problem here with the CPU load on my Toshiba laptop with Win XP both in FD 7 and 8 (Demo). For that reason FD is useless to me. Also, when writing, the letters are displayed in delay. This can be quite annoying, when writing fast.
FD 6 works fine.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .LAG</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2009/final-draft-8-briefly/comment-page-2#comment-171475</link>
		<dc:creator>.LAG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 07:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/?p=2904#comment-171475</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nelson (#56)...great, well-reasoned response. thanks for the insights.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nelson (#56)&#8230;great, well-reasoned response. thanks for the insights.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lane Applewhite</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2009/final-draft-8-briefly/comment-page-2#comment-171461</link>
		<dc:creator>Lane Applewhite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 21:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/?p=2904#comment-171461</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I tried the demo last night. It&#039;s pretty much a dud for me. Again, some innovative new features, but sloppy-ass programming and testing by the FD crew. Sorry Kirsten.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I love the notecard feature, how it shows you all your sceens (with dialog) and allows you to move them around. There are other little features which are nice including a pop up window which allows you to look at the scene headings and re-type them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not sure if the torture of the SmartType bug has been fixed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But I am on board with this version because the thing is just damn slow! The autosave takes too long. I hate the FDX formats -- is that necessary?. WTF is that for. Are you guys trying to be Microsoft by rendering old file formats obsolete?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Biggest problem: when I am scrolling down or writing fast it hangs up for a second on my computer (running a Toshiba A135 which I bought in June 2007). Totally unacceptable for a ADHD speed demon like me.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Final 7 is fine for now.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried the demo last night. It&#8217;s pretty much a dud for me. Again, some innovative new features, but sloppy-ass programming and testing by the FD crew. Sorry Kirsten.</p>

<p>I love the notecard feature, how it shows you all your sceens (with dialog) and allows you to move them around. There are other little features which are nice including a pop up window which allows you to look at the scene headings and re-type them.</p>

<p>Not sure if the torture of the SmartType bug has been fixed.</p>

<p>But I am on board with this version because the thing is just damn slow! The autosave takes too long. I hate the FDX formats &#8212; is that necessary?. WTF is that for. Are you guys trying to be Microsoft by rendering old file formats obsolete?</p>

<p>Biggest problem: when I am scrolling down or writing fast it hangs up for a second on my computer (running a Toshiba A135 which I bought in June 2007). Totally unacceptable for a ADHD speed demon like me.</p>

<p>Final 7 is fine for now.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ella</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2009/final-draft-8-briefly/comment-page-2#comment-171452</link>
		<dc:creator>Ella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 00:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/?p=2904#comment-171452</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Please help - does anyone know how to you place &quot;elements&quot; onto the toolbar - it doesn&#039;t seem to automatically appear and it&#039;s the most important aspect of any screenwriting program...?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;E&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please help &#8211; does anyone know how to you place &#8220;elements&#8221; onto the toolbar &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t seem to automatically appear and it&#8217;s the most important aspect of any screenwriting program&#8230;?</p>

<p>E</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
