<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VHS, RIP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/vhs-rip/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/vhs-rip</link>
	<description>A ton of useful information about screenwriting.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:23:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/vhs-rip/comment-page-1#comment-166013</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/?p=1414#comment-166013</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@ Sarah:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You mean as &lt;em&gt;you&lt;/em&gt; would use LOL, ROFL. I wouldn&#039;t.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now that we&#039;ve established what it means, why do you use it? Is there any reason that you need to keep us apprised of your emotional state and whether or not you are smiling? It&#039;s simply not relevant to what you are trying to say.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you really must inform us about your emotional state, then why not do it through expressive writing, rather than ridiculous symbols/abbreviations/emoticons?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Sarah:</p>

<p>You mean as <em>you</em> would use LOL, ROFL. I wouldn&#8217;t.</p>

<p>Now that we&#8217;ve established what it means, why do you use it? Is there any reason that you need to keep us apprised of your emotional state and whether or not you are smiling? It&#8217;s simply not relevant to what you are trying to say.</p>

<p>If you really must inform us about your emotional state, then why not do it through expressive writing, rather than ridiculous symbols/abbreviations/emoticons?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/vhs-rip/comment-page-1#comment-165926</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 19:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/?p=1414#comment-165926</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Dave&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;G/g means &quot;grin(s)&quot; ...same as you&#039;d use *lol&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;rofl&lt;/em&gt; etc.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dave</p>

<p><em>G/g means &#8220;grin(s)&#8221; &#8230;same as you&#8217;d use *lol</em>, <em>rofl</em> etc.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek K. Miller</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/vhs-rip/comment-page-1#comment-165568</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek K. Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 06:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/?p=1414#comment-165568</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Three years ago I listed why I think DVDs (and their successors) suck. Not that VHS tapes were inherently better in all respects, but I think tapes were less insulting to customers:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.penmachine.com/2006/03/why-dvds-suck.html&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three years ago I listed why I think DVDs (and their successors) suck. Not that VHS tapes were inherently better in all respects, but I think tapes were less insulting to customers:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.penmachine.com/2006/03/why-dvds-suck.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.penmachine.com/2006/03/why-dvds-suck.html</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Lang</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/vhs-rip/comment-page-1#comment-165567</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Lang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 06:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/?p=1414#comment-165567</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Audio cassettes. Always getting mangled. having to rewind and fastforward randomly to find the song you want.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The confusion over which side is playing, in which direction. The big spaces of silence when you listen to an album spanning both sides.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Audio cassettes. Always getting mangled. having to rewind and fastforward randomly to find the song you want.</p>

<p>The confusion over which side is playing, in which direction. The big spaces of silence when you listen to an album spanning both sides.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Black</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/vhs-rip/comment-page-1#comment-165550</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Black</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/?p=1414#comment-165550</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The one thing I&#039;ve found only recently mediated is the need for digital format readers to replicate what the laws of physics provide for analog format readers.  If I stop a VHS recording, I can eject the tape, power the player down, wait three weeks, power the player up, insert the tape, and continue right from where I left off.  This is the flip-side of the must-rewind coin, and I always felt happy with the balance VHS provided.  So much so, in fact, that I found a $6 VCR in very good condition for viewing my old tapes, rather than repurchase everything in DVD.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As to Blu-Ray, where &lt;em&gt;Finding Nemo&lt;/em&gt; highlighted the increased picture quality and detail of DVD over VHS (watched it in each format), &lt;em&gt;Wall-E&lt;/em&gt; might be the only movie I&#039;ve seen so far to provide a motivation to upgrade to Blu-Ray.  That won&#039;t happen anytime soon.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It shouldn&#039;t be overlooked that with the advent of extended storage space has come a lot of extraneous garbage in the form of copious &quot;extras.&quot;  At least VHS tended to focus solely on the primary content; and if I wanted to fast-forward through previews I never received a &quot;That operation is not permitted&quot; message.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Formats provide a content infrastructure, and as formats change, so too may the content.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one thing I&#8217;ve found only recently mediated is the need for digital format readers to replicate what the laws of physics provide for analog format readers.  If I stop a VHS recording, I can eject the tape, power the player down, wait three weeks, power the player up, insert the tape, and continue right from where I left off.  This is the flip-side of the must-rewind coin, and I always felt happy with the balance VHS provided.  So much so, in fact, that I found a $6 VCR in very good condition for viewing my old tapes, rather than repurchase everything in DVD.</p>

<p>As to Blu-Ray, where <em>Finding Nemo</em> highlighted the increased picture quality and detail of DVD over VHS (watched it in each format), <em>Wall-E</em> might be the only movie I&#8217;ve seen so far to provide a motivation to upgrade to Blu-Ray.  That won&#8217;t happen anytime soon.</p>

<p>It shouldn&#8217;t be overlooked that with the advent of extended storage space has come a lot of extraneous garbage in the form of copious &#8220;extras.&#8221;  At least VHS tended to focus solely on the primary content; and if I wanted to fast-forward through previews I never received a &#8220;That operation is not permitted&#8221; message.</p>

<p>Formats provide a content infrastructure, and as formats change, so too may the content.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/vhs-rip/comment-page-1#comment-165542</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/?p=1414#comment-165542</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;OK, these comments need nitpicking all over the place:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@ Sarah:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What&#039;s with the &quot;*G&quot; interspersed with your comments? Is that supposed to mean something?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@ Tennyson:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This has been addressed by others - digital copies do not degrade, they are exact copies.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@ Devin:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Isn&#039;t it fitting, rather than ironic, that the director of Videodrome should get the last VHS release?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@ KL and others claiming that optical media is less durable than tape:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The CD/DVD disc is not &quot;naked&quot;. It&#039;s protected by a thick layer of polycarbonate. The data is not stored on the plastic, it&#039;s stored on the aluminum layer underneath the plastic. Even very heavy scratches can simply be polished out. It&#039;s not difficult at all to restore highly scratched discs - some good polishing, and you have a perfectly smooth, unscratched surface back.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In contrast, videotape is much more difficult to repair, and you&#039;ll never completely restore it like you can with optical media. And once you have done the restoring, you can make as many perfect backup copies as you like.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, these comments need nitpicking all over the place:</p>

<p>@ Sarah:</p>

<p>What&#8217;s with the &#8220;*G&#8221; interspersed with your comments? Is that supposed to mean something?</p>

<p>@ Tennyson:</p>

<p>This has been addressed by others &#8211; digital copies do not degrade, they are exact copies.</p>

<p>@ Devin:</p>

<p>Isn&#8217;t it fitting, rather than ironic, that the director of Videodrome should get the last VHS release?</p>

<p>@ KL and others claiming that optical media is less durable than tape:</p>

<p>The CD/DVD disc is not &#8220;naked&#8221;. It&#8217;s protected by a thick layer of polycarbonate. The data is not stored on the plastic, it&#8217;s stored on the aluminum layer underneath the plastic. Even very heavy scratches can simply be polished out. It&#8217;s not difficult at all to restore highly scratched discs &#8211; some good polishing, and you have a perfectly smooth, unscratched surface back.</p>

<p>In contrast, videotape is much more difficult to repair, and you&#8217;ll never completely restore it like you can with optical media. And once you have done the restoring, you can make as many perfect backup copies as you like.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/vhs-rip/comment-page-1#comment-165539</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/?p=1414#comment-165539</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ll never miss VHS for one simple line: &quot;This film has been modified from its original version. It has been formatted to fit your screen.&quot; Gone are the extra pan &amp; scans some unknown person added which ruined the directors original vision for a fixed 1 frame shot.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;...and re-winding. I don&#039;t have time for that! lol.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll never miss VHS for one simple line: &#8220;This film has been modified from its original version. It has been formatted to fit your screen.&#8221; Gone are the extra pan &amp; scans some unknown person added which ruined the directors original vision for a fixed 1 frame shot.</p>

<p>&#8230;and re-winding. I don&#8217;t have time for that! lol.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jake</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/vhs-rip/comment-page-1#comment-165533</link>
		<dc:creator>jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 00:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/?p=1414#comment-165533</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sad. And sadder yet that the nightmare that is DVD player (un)usability is now the standard. My late Dad, with most of his pleasures curtailed by ill health, spent much of his last year enjoying his favourite films again. Plagued by failing eyesight which meant he couldn&#039;t even read most of the tiny menu options text forced on DVD viewers by confusing navigation and abysmal selection designs, he watched his films using an old VHS machine.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yes, DVD offers much that is better than VHS,, and yes video tape is an inherently fragile medium, but VHS offered (and still offers) something that DVD so far has not - &#039;stick it in and press play&#039; simplicity. Simplicity that even an old, ill and dying man used to brighten his days.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad. And sadder yet that the nightmare that is DVD player (un)usability is now the standard. My late Dad, with most of his pleasures curtailed by ill health, spent much of his last year enjoying his favourite films again. Plagued by failing eyesight which meant he couldn&#8217;t even read most of the tiny menu options text forced on DVD viewers by confusing navigation and abysmal selection designs, he watched his films using an old VHS machine.</p>

<p>Yes, DVD offers much that is better than VHS,, and yes video tape is an inherently fragile medium, but VHS offered (and still offers) something that DVD so far has not &#8211; &#8217;stick it in and press play&#8217; simplicity. Simplicity that even an old, ill and dying man used to brighten his days.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Hart</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/vhs-rip/comment-page-1#comment-165531</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 00:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/?p=1414#comment-165531</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I personally find the helical scan drum and tape engagement mechanism to be quite beautiful. I used to clean the heads myself, and would run my vcr without the lid on so that I could watch it work.
I think this is similar to the attraction that people feel for vinyl, there is a fantastic mechanical/tactile aspect to the system. Most optical discs just don&#039;t have it ( mini-disc is an exception ) and I must say that I miss it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally find the helical scan drum and tape engagement mechanism to be quite beautiful. I used to clean the heads myself, and would run my vcr without the lid on so that I could watch it work.
I think this is similar to the attraction that people feel for vinyl, there is a fantastic mechanical/tactile aspect to the system. Most optical discs just don&#8217;t have it ( mini-disc is an exception ) and I must say that I miss it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judson</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/vhs-rip/comment-page-1#comment-165527</link>
		<dc:creator>Judson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 22:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/?p=1414#comment-165527</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Brian I&#039;m guessing you worked at a video store before DVDs. I was a video store guy during the transition. While you &lt;em&gt;can&lt;/em&gt; fix VHSs after hundreds of views DVDs are scratched to hell at about 30-50 rents.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I never had to fix them like you describe, we were a big chain, and just threw them away, but they lasted forever. (multi hundred rents)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They are a pain, and inelegant, but they are rough and tumble, much more so than naked optical disks.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brian I&#8217;m guessing you worked at a video store before DVDs. I was a video store guy during the transition. While you <em>can</em> fix VHSs after hundreds of views DVDs are scratched to hell at about 30-50 rents.</p>

<p>I never had to fix them like you describe, we were a big chain, and just threw them away, but they lasted forever. (multi hundred rents)</p>

<p>They are a pain, and inelegant, but they are rough and tumble, much more so than naked optical disks.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenny</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/vhs-rip/comment-page-1#comment-165521</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/?p=1414#comment-165521</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;do miss one thing about VHS. Unlike many DVDs where you have to sit there and watch what seems like an increasing number of previews before you get access to the main menu &amp; corresponding &quot;play movie&quot; selection, at least the VHS allow you to fast-forward all that preview stuff and get right to the movie.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There have been many times where I fell asleep before getting through the preview &amp; ads in a rental DVD.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do miss one thing about VHS. Unlike many DVDs where you have to sit there and watch what seems like an increasing number of previews before you get access to the main menu &amp; corresponding &#8220;play movie&#8221; selection, at least the VHS allow you to fast-forward all that preview stuff and get right to the movie.</p>

<p>There have been many times where I fell asleep before getting through the preview &amp; ads in a rental DVD.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
