<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Changing horses mid-stream</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/changing-horses-mid-stream/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/changing-horses-mid-stream</link>
	<description>A ton of useful information about screenwriting.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:52:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LHOOQtius ov Borg</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/changing-horses-mid-stream/comment-page-1#comment-121050</link>
		<dc:creator>LHOOQtius ov Borg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/changing-horses-mid-stream#comment-121050</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Is it a mathematical derivative of Goldie Hawn, approximating the slope of comedy without ever achieving intersection?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Awesome.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Whoever said mathematics and pop culture humor can never intermarry, that right there is the counterexample that invalidates the claim.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Is it a mathematical derivative of Goldie Hawn, approximating the slope of comedy without ever achieving intersection?&#8221;</p>

<p>Awesome.</p>

<p>Whoever said mathematics and pop culture humor can never intermarry, that right there is the counterexample that invalidates the claim.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/changing-horses-mid-stream/comment-page-1#comment-121032</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 03:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/changing-horses-mid-stream#comment-121032</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I had a similar problem. I was about 83 pages through a script I was (and still am) working on when I realized I have no B plot. For a comedy that should be quick and funny, this script feels long and not funny. So I&#039;m trying to come up with subplots that make my comedy script funny(ier) and relate thematically. Not easy. Sometimes not fun. But it must be done!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a similar problem. I was about 83 pages through a script I was (and still am) working on when I realized I have no B plot. For a comedy that should be quick and funny, this script feels long and not funny. So I&#8217;m trying to come up with subplots that make my comedy script funny(ier) and relate thematically. Not easy. Sometimes not fun. But it must be done!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/changing-horses-mid-stream/comment-page-1#comment-121025</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/changing-horses-mid-stream#comment-121025</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I went through this with my most recent script.  Forty pages into the first draft, I came up with some radical ideas that not only changed the tone but also some of the character relationships.  It was frustrating having to start anew but I&#039;m so glad I did because the new and improved ideas were indeed a major improvement and also guaranteed a good hook.  The only problem I see in this practice would be if the writer is ALWAYS doing this so that they NEVER end up finishing a script.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went through this with my most recent script.  Forty pages into the first draft, I came up with some radical ideas that not only changed the tone but also some of the character relationships.  It was frustrating having to start anew but I&#8217;m so glad I did because the new and improved ideas were indeed a major improvement and also guaranteed a good hook.  The only problem I see in this practice would be if the writer is ALWAYS doing this so that they NEVER end up finishing a script.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/changing-horses-mid-stream/comment-page-1#comment-120908</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/changing-horses-mid-stream#comment-120908</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It happens. But this is why planning ahead is worth it. Outline, outline, and outline.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It happens. But this is why planning ahead is worth it. Outline, outline, and outline.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Synthian</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/changing-horses-mid-stream/comment-page-1#comment-120840</link>
		<dc:creator>Synthian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 06:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/changing-horses-mid-stream#comment-120840</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;120 pages of ambivalence.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Genius.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;120 pages of ambivalence.&#8221;</p>

<p>Genius.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leif Smart</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/changing-horses-mid-stream/comment-page-1#comment-120826</link>
		<dc:creator>Leif Smart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/changing-horses-mid-stream#comment-120826</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I thought the Skeleton Key was really good and worth checking it out if you haven&#039;t already. It&#039;s probably my 2nd favorite Kate Hudson movie after Almost Famous.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the Skeleton Key was really good and worth checking it out if you haven&#8217;t already. It&#8217;s probably my 2nd favorite Kate Hudson movie after Almost Famous.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lex</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/changing-horses-mid-stream/comment-page-1#comment-120813</link>
		<dc:creator>Lex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/changing-horses-mid-stream#comment-120813</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Just another piece of advice - Once you&#039;ve gotten the new outline done, go back to your first script and see if there&#039;s anything worth salvaging. I ran into a similar problem with one of my scripts, but I found that a couple of scenes (or even just lines of dialogue) could fit into the new version with only minor changes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Lex&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just another piece of advice &#8211; Once you&#8217;ve gotten the new outline done, go back to your first script and see if there&#8217;s anything worth salvaging. I ran into a similar problem with one of my scripts, but I found that a couple of scenes (or even just lines of dialogue) could fit into the new version with only minor changes.</p>

<ul>
<li>Lex</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim W.</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/changing-horses-mid-stream/comment-page-1#comment-120811</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/changing-horses-mid-stream#comment-120811</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, god.  The mid-stream rewrite.  There are scripts I&#039;ve rewritten a dozen times and never actually finished.  It&#039;s probably my own worst enemy.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for Kate Hudson, I&#039;m still waiting for her to be in another movie, besides Almost Famous, that I actually want to see.  She was so good in that, and then apparently got too much career advice from her mother.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, god.  The mid-stream rewrite.  There are scripts I&#8217;ve rewritten a dozen times and never actually finished.  It&#8217;s probably my own worst enemy.  </p>

<p>As for Kate Hudson, I&#8217;m still waiting for her to be in another movie, besides Almost Famous, that I actually want to see.  She was so good in that, and then apparently got too much career advice from her mother.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madmind</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/changing-horses-mid-stream/comment-page-1#comment-120796</link>
		<dc:creator>madmind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/changing-horses-mid-stream#comment-120796</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As Alex says, it&#039;s great to have the QandA posts back. They are a pleasure to read (and of course extremely informative/helping)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Although I am in no way a professional writer I too have witnessed this fresh idea &quot;problem&quot; if you can call it that way. The question I always had and still have is whether the new idea is really better than the old one. To at least get a better feeling of it I have implemented a personal working &quot;ethics&quot; that I will put new important ideas on hold for at least two or three days. That way I can cool down and let the idea truly sink in. When the idea is still valid I will put it into the script, even if it means to scrap the rest.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Alex says, it&#8217;s great to have the QandA posts back. They are a pleasure to read (and of course extremely informative/helping)</p>

<p>Although I am in no way a professional writer I too have witnessed this fresh idea &#8220;problem&#8221; if you can call it that way. The question I always had and still have is whether the new idea is really better than the old one. To at least get a better feeling of it I have implemented a personal working &#8220;ethics&#8221; that I will put new important ideas on hold for at least two or three days. That way I can cool down and let the idea truly sink in. When the idea is still valid I will put it into the script, even if it means to scrap the rest.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/changing-horses-mid-stream/comment-page-1#comment-120792</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnaugust.com/archives/2008/changing-horses-mid-stream#comment-120792</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s nice to have these Q&amp;A&#039;s back again. It&#039;s encouraging! Thanks&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nice to have these Q&amp;A&#8217;s back again. It&#8217;s encouraging! Thanks</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
