<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rewriting based on other people&#8217;s notes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnaugust.com/archives/2004/rewriting-based-on-other-peoples-notes/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2004/rewriting-based-on-other-peoples-notes</link>
	<description>A ton of useful information about screenwriting.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:45:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: monewmarket@hotmail.com</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2004/rewriting-based-on-other-peoples-notes/comment-page-1#comment-43895</link>
		<dc:creator>monewmarket@hotmail.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 17:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=318#comment-43895</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hello John, I&#039;ve been dabbling in screenwriting for the last four years, some years taking it more earnest than others. I&#039;m at the stage now where I&#039;ve five or six screenplays written, all in various stages of completion and incompletion. I intend to re-read them all next month with a view to selecting the best one and taking it that stage furher. Any views as to the criteria I should prioritise in doing so, apart from the obvious such as saleability, originality, etc etc. ta. Mo&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello John, I&#8217;ve been dabbling in screenwriting for the last four years, some years taking it more earnest than others. I&#8217;m at the stage now where I&#8217;ve five or six screenplays written, all in various stages of completion and incompletion. I intend to re-read them all next month with a view to selecting the best one and taking it that stage furher. Any views as to the criteria I should prioritise in doing so, apart from the obvious such as saleability, originality, etc etc. ta. Mo</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Lehane</title>
		<link>http://johnaugust.com/archives/2004/rewriting-based-on-other-peoples-notes/comment-page-1#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Lehane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2004 23:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=318#comment-446</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you very much John. That was very helpful, especially the first point.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thank you again. Kev.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much John. That was very helpful, especially the first point.</p>

<p>Thank you again. Kev.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
