Are four scripts better than one?

I have finished penning a dramatic quadrilogy (four scripts that interlock) and now that I’m finished, I fear that there isn’t enough action to make this a serious contender for production and that it would not find an audience.

Do you have any advice for making works a little more commerically viable to today’s market?

– Christopher Bishop

First problem: “dramatic quadrilogy.”

I applaud your ambition, but the concept of four interlocking scripts feels better suited to European arthouses, rather than mainstream Hollywood. If the latter is your intention, I’d recommend figuring out which of your four scripts is the strongest, and focussing all your efforts on that one, even if it means ripping stuff out of your other scripts.

You’re much better off with one good screenplay than four noble intentions.

  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
December 17, 2004 @ 9:06 am |
Filed under: Film Industry, QandA

2 Responses to “Are four scripts better than one?”

  1. Savisky says:

    Obviously, I know nothing about your “quadrilogy” but, what most likely is the case, those four films can be streamlined, or edited down to at least three, making the whole story smarter, and faster paced. Trilogies are all the rage these days, and more audience friendly. Who, besides George Lucas, can get away with more than three interlocking films? And even then, I think Star Wars has gone on a little too long.

  2. RDane says:

    Blasphemy!

    The force you have not!

 

About

This site is run by screenwriter John August. Most of the time, he answers reader-submitted questions about the craft, but occasionally he goes on tangents that run far afield of writing and filmmaking. You'll also find info on past, present and future projects.


For photos, blurbs and other self-promotion, you can check out his Facebook fan page.

Possibly Related Posts